Health Care Ethics USA Christian Anthropology and Health Care

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health Care Ethics USA Christian Anthropology and Health Care FALL 2018 volume 26, number 4 Health Care Ethics USA A quarterly resource for the Catholic Health Ministry USA QUARTERLY FEATURE | 1 FROM THE FIELD | 20 Christian Anthropology Ethics Recruitment and and Health Care Role Awareness: What We’re Hearing Darlene Fozard Weaver, Ph.D. Jenna Speckart, D.Be. FEATURE | 7 ETHICAL CURRENTS | 23 Opportunistic Risk Reduction Salpingectomy Medicaid Makes It Possible and Ovarian Cancer Fr. Charles Bouchard, O.P., S.T.D. G. Kevin Donovan, MD, MA, Kevin FitzGerald, SJ, Ph.D., Ph.D., and Daniel Sulmasy, MD, Ph.D. RESPONDEO | 28 FROM THE FIELD | 14 Theology and Ethics: Reflections on the Revisions Ethics, Public Policy to Part Six of the ERDs and Care of Individuals with John A. Gallagher, Ph.D. Intellectual Disability Peter Smith, MD, MA LEGAL LENS | 35 Copyright © 2018 CHA. Published quarterly by the Catholic Health Association of the United States (CHA) and the Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics (CHCE) at Saint Louis University. Permission granted to CHA-member organizations and Saint Louis Universiry to copy and distribute for educational purposed. ISSN 2372-7683 FALL 2018 FEATURE ARTICLE chausa.org/hceusa Christian Anthropology Christian Anthropology and Health Care Darlene Fozard Weaver, Ph.D. Human persons are not only creatures but sinners. Sin designates the disruption of proper An inventory of contributions of the Catholic relationship with God and others.4 Sin disrupts moral tradition may not include theological our relationships because it corrupts the 1 anthropology on that list, but it should. agential capacities by which we perceive, think, Reflection on human persons through a affectively respond to stimuli, and choose. Sin theological lens yields a number of normative therefore undermines our ability to perceive insights. In particular, it can nuance Catholic and respect others’ moral worth and our understanding of human dignity—a willingness to make choices that affect others. foundational principle for health care ethics— Importantly, these consequences of sin cannot in a way that yields fruit for health care and be corrected simply by stipulating that others health care ethics. have an equal and irreducible moral status. Sin may even operate in the ways we defend others’ THEOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY moral worth, influencing the way we describe what it means to be human, what a good Understood theologically, human persons are human life looks like, and how we should creatures, sinners, and adopted children and respond to moral failures. siblings in the Holy Spirit. As embodied creatures, human beings share physical needs Grace is a name for the gift of being drawn into (like a need for water) and experiences (like dynamics of right relationship with God, self, growth, anger, illness, and play).2 Human and others. Put theologically, grace is a share in persons are composite creatures, having bodies God’s own life. Our capacities as moral agents but also the stuff of transcendence and agency, need to be healed from the corrupting influence like consciousness, freedom, and memory. of sin. Grace allows us to recognize ourselves Moreover, we are formed within social and others in light of God, who recognizes our networks—many of which we do not choose— creatureliness as good, who loves us despite our in better and worse ways. We are irreducibly sinfulness, and who is committed to reconciling social creatures and our flourishing cannot be and sanctifying us. Grace enables us to had in isolation. Yet we are also ultimately recognize the moral worth of others in more responsible for ourselves. The shared and more inclusive circles of regard. It dimensions of human existence are interpreted empowers us to choose to act in a fashion and actualized in culturally and historically consistent with that regard. Another way to put diverse ways, but they provide a basis for a this is to say that grace makes us adopted Christian humanism that is important in children of God and therefore siblings of one Catholic ethics.3 another in God’s spirit. To be adopted by God 1 Copyright© 2018 CHA. Permission granted to CHA-member organizations and Saint Louis University to copy and distribute for educational purposes. FALL 2018 FEATURE ARTICLE chausa.org/hceusa Christian Anthropology is to receive God’s Spirit (Romans 8:15), and therefore, to receive an interior transformation A theological anthropology that that makes new things possible for us as creatures and for our social relations. Adoption is attentive to creaturely incorporates us into a new family that is more capacities, sin, and grace can inclusive and more rightly ordered. And yet we must acknowledge that we are living between help us view dignity not only as the “already and the not yet.” The a stipulation of human worth reconciliation that grace will accomplish is not yet complete. but as a practice of inclusive regard. HUMAN DIGNITY What might the broad features of such a consistent with that dignity, what Gaudium et theological anthropology contribute to health spes calls “a genuinely human life.”8 Fourth, in care ethics? Let us consider its import for the Catholic moral tradition, dignity operates as a principle of human dignity, which both founds moral expression of Christian humanism. a right to health care and morally informs the Dignity is therefore emblematic in meaning. practice of health care. Emblematic dignity assumes human embodiment, sociality, and agency, and thereby In Catholic moral tradition one can pick out resists reductionistic views of humanity. four inter-related meanings or functions for dignity: inherent dignity, consequent dignity, In Catholic tradition, dignity also takes its normative dignity, and emblematic dignity.5 meaning from the revelation of humanity in First, dignity refers to the inherent worth of Jesus Christ. Jesus’ life and death clarify dignity human beings.6 Inherent dignity is something as a moral criterion, yoking it to inclusivity, humans have, regardless of abilities or mercy, and a preferential option for vulnerable aptitudes. Yet Catholic tradition also speaks of human beings.9 Importantly, Jesus’ public dignity as though it can be diminished or ministry includes stories in which he challenged forsaken. Gaudium et spes, for example, says that prevailing ideas about good and evil and the we attain dignity “through spontaneous choice social caste systems aligned with those of what is good.”7 So, a second sense of dignity judgments. Those moments of critique and is as a mark of human flourishing or fruit of a subversion are powerful reminders that moral rightly ordered life. We may call this judgments and norms can themselves be tools consequent dignity. Third, human dignity serves that contract our regard for the dignity of as a normative criterion that informs moral others. judgment. We evaluate the moral quality of choices, relationships, and institutions based on A theological anthropology that is attentive to how they align with or violate dignity. creaturely capacities, sin, and grace can help us Normative dignity also has positive moral view dignity not only as a stipulation of human force. It entitles human persons to the worth but as a practice of inclusive regard. conditions necessary for a manner of life 2 Copyright© 2018 CHA. Permission granted to CHA-member organizations and Saint Louis University to copy and distribute for educational purposes. FALL 2018 FEATURE ARTICLE chausa.org/hceusa Christian Anthropology According to Steven Pinker, dignity is a matter flourishing) waxes or wanes as I nurture of human perception.10 There is some truth to inclusive regard for the inherent dignity of his claim. Even though all human persons have others.12 The theological anthropology sketched dignity by virtue of being human (the inherent earlier helps us to appreciate that dignity is a dignity described above), the challenge we commitment to attribute equal moral worth to confront is that we too often fail to perceive their our fellow human beings. Doing so is a worth and act on it accordingly. Dignity necessary aspect of discerning their inherent concerns the recognition or misrecognition of value (inherent dignity); a condition for human moral worth within social dynamics of realizing the human good (consequent dignity); vulnerability, power, deception, and and applying dignity as a moral criterion truthfulness.11 To be clear, I am not claiming (normative dignity). Attending to dignity as a that human persons only have worth if others practice of inclusive regard is also important for attribute it to them. That would be a denial of emblematic dignity, as a moral expression of the first sense of dignity. Rather, the argument Christian humanism. Because sin can operate here is that: 1) the perception or denial of even in moral accounts of what it means to be dignity is a social process, and 2) dynamics of human and what a good life looks like, it is sin or grace affect our capacities and our essential to engage in self-criticism and to willingness to recognize or reject the moral include and attend to critical voices, particularly worth of others. Dignity, then, cannot be from vulnerable populations.13 reduced to a stipulation or affirmation of human moral worth, or a consequence of a IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE ETHICS rightly ordered life, or a normative criterion for evaluating choices and structures, or an emblem Christian anthropology and its illumination of of a larger Christian humanism. The perceptual human dignity give rise to multiple character of dignity means that we must also commitments that are important for health care understand dignity as an active form of regard. ethics. Commitments to respect, justice, mercy, Claims about dignity are exercises in expanding and the common good, for example, flow from or contracting the scope of our moral concern. and also provide an essential context of respect Because sin affects our capacities and for human dignity.
Recommended publications
  • White House Announcement on New Commission Members
    THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ___________________________________________________________________________________ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 7, 2010 President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts WASHINGTON – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to appoint the following individuals to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues: • Lonnie Ali, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Anita L. Allen, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Barbara F. Atkinson, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Nita A. Farahany, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Alexander G. Garza, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Christine Grady, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Stephen L. Hauser, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Raju Kucherlapati, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Nelson Michael, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues • Daniel Sulmasy, Member, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues The Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues will advise the President on bioethical issues that may emerge from advances in biomedicine and related areas of science and technology. It will work with the goal of identifying and promoting policies and practices that ensure scientific research, health care delivery, and technological innovation are conducted in an ethically responsible manner. These candidates will join the current Chair, Amy Gutmann, and Vice-Chair, James Wagner, as Members on the Commission. President Obama said, “I am grateful that these impressive individuals have decided to dedicate their talent and experience to this important Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Is Inevitable - a Bad Death Is Not
    The Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research International Workshop Death is Inevitable - A Bad Death is not Chair: A. Mark Clarfield July 4-5, 2018 Caesarea , Israel Death is Inevitable - A Bad Death is not Table of Contents Workshop Program 4 Introduction 6 List of Speakers & Chairpersons 7 Abstracts 9 Biographies 21 Article: The Dying Patient Act, 2005: Israeli Innovative Legislation 60 3 International Workshop International Workshop Death is Inevitable - A Bad Death is not Wednesday-Thursday, July 4-5, 2018, Dan Caesarea Hotel th Wednesday, July 4 , 2018 09:00-09:30 Gathering & Welcome Coffee 09:30-10:00 Opening session and Greetings Chair: A. Mark Clarfield, Ben-Gurion University Moshe Bar Siman Tov, Director General, Ministry of Health Orly Manor, Chair, Board of Directors, NIHP Pesach Shvartzman, Israel Palliative Medicine Association Tikva Meron, Tmicha - The Israeli Association of Palliative Care 10:00-11:30 Session 1: From whence have we come; to where we (might) be going Prof. Baroness Ilora Finlay, UK - House of Lords A short history of palliative care Dr. Daniel Sulmasy, US - Georgetown University Spiritual dimensions in the practice of palliative medicine Discussant: Tikva Meron, Tmicha 11:30-11:45 Coffee break 11:45-13:00 Session 2 : Clinical case 1 Chair: Charles Sprung, Hadassah Small Group Leaders: Charles Sprung, Hadassah, Sandy Buchman, University of Toronto, Ilora Finlay, House of Lords, Rotem Telem, Sourasky Medical Center 13:00-14:00 Lunch 14:00-15:00 Session 3: To tell you the truth…or not Chair: Shai
    [Show full text]
  • Farr A. Curlin, M.D
    FA Curlin, 11/8/11 FARR A. CURLIN, MD Home Address Work Address 835 Park Drive University of Chicago Medical Center Flossmoor, Illinois 60422 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2007 Chicago, Illinois 60637 (773) 834.9178 (telephone) (773) 834.2238 (fax) E-mail: fcurlin[at]uchicago.edu Web: pmr.uchicago.edu/people/leadership/farr-curlin-md Positions Held The University of Chicago: 2003 - 2005 Instructor of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine 2003 - 2006 Associate Faculty, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program 2004 - Associate Faculty, the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics 2005 - 2010 Assistant Professor of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine 2009 - Co-Director, Program on Medicine and Religion 2010 - Associate Professor of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine Other: 2008 - Associate Medical Director, Horizon Hospice, Chicago, IL Education and Post Graduate Training 1992 B.A., with distinction, Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1998 M.D., University of North Carolina School of Medicine 1998 – 2001 Resident, Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago Hospitals 2001 – 2003 Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar, The University of Chicago 2003 – 2004 Fellow, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago 2006 Summer Institute for Survey Research Methods, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1 FA Curlin, 11/8/11 2008 Program in Palliative Care Education and Practice, Harvard University Pre-graduate experience 1992 Research assistant, Synthetic
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Ethics Into Action 25-Year Retrospective And
    PUTTING ETHICS INTO ACTION 25-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE AND ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE It is my pleasure to share with you this special version of the Berman Institute of Bioethics Annual Report that celebrates all that we have achieved in the last year, as well as throughout our entire 25-year history. As we observe this milestone DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE anniversary during 2020, we’ll reflect on those achievements while also envisioning possibilities for what is to come. The Berman Institute’s legacy over its first 25 years has been its leadership in helping to establish a young and 25-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE interdisciplinary field of research, scholarship, education, service, and outreach. As bioethics has grown from its roots Origins 2 in medical ethics and philosophy, the Berman Institute’s faculty led the expansion first into the realm of public health and subsequently into a broad range of interdisciplinary work, with a wide range of real-world applications. Today, bioethics A World Class Faculty 8 is an integral part not only of clinical medical practice and public health, but also science, research, policymaking, and virtually every area where new biomedical and technological innovations raise important ethical and policy issues. Making Change in the World 14 Two groups have been integral to the Berman Institute’s growth and impact — our remarkable faculty and our engaged A Lasting Legacy 18 and generous philanthropic supporters, working together to realize our shared commitment to the betterment of human life by addressing ethical issues in science, clinical care, and public health, locally and globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A—Digest of Other White House Announcements
    Appendix A—Digest of Other White House Announcements The following list includes the President’s public January 6 schedule and other items of general interest an- In the morning, in the Oval Office, the Presi- nounced by the Office of the Press Secretary dent and Vice President Joe Biden had an intel- and not included elsewhere in this book. ligence briefing followed by an economic brief- ing. Then, also in the Oval Office, he met with January 1 his senior advisers. Later, he had separate tele- In the morning, in Kailua, HI, the President phone conversations with Sens. Christopher J. had an intelligence briefing. Dodd and Byron L. Dorgan to discuss their de- cisions to not seek reelection. January 2 In the afternoon, in the Cabinet Room, the In the morning, the President had an intelli- President met with Speaker of the House of gence briefing. Representatives Nancy Pelosi, House Commit- tee on Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry January 3 A. Waxman, House Committee on Ways and In the evening, the President, Mrs. Obama, Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel, House and their daughters Sasha and Malia returned Committee on Education and Labor Chairman to Washington, DC, arriving the following George Miller, and House Committee on Rules morning. Chairman Louise McIntosh Slaughter. January 4 January 7 In the afternoon, the President had an intelli- In the morning, in the Oval Office, the Presi- gence briefing. Later, in the Oval Office, he dent and Vice President Joe Biden had an intel- met with Homeland Security and Counterter- ligence briefing. Then, also in the Oval Office, rorism Adviser John O.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INAUGURAL Completed Life Conference
    THE INAUGURAL Completed Life Conference Thursdays September 3rd through October 8th, 2020 9-11am Pacific | 12-2pm Eastern | 4-6pm UTC Table of Contents 3 .......................................... Conference Schedule of Events 4 .......................Conference Virtual Platform – Access to GlobalMeet 5 ................................................ Networking during the Conference 6 .......................................................... Welcome from our Founder 8 .............................................. Welcome from our Keynote Speaker 10 ........................................... Welcome from our Program Director 12 ....................................... Session One: What is a Completed Life? 15 ..................................... Session Two: Cases for a Completed Life: Clinical Points of View 18 ........................................... Session Three: A Case for Objections and Ethical Concerns 22 ................................. Session Four: The Completed Life through an International Lens: Implications of Medical Aid-in-Dying 25 .................... Session Five: Interdisciplinary Narratives: End-of-Life Challenges that Result in Organizational Changes 27 ...................... Session Six: Completing Life by Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking (VSED): A Little Known Yet Readily Available End-of-Life Option 30 ........................................... Closing Keynote from our President 32 .........................................................................Special Thanks 33 ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Death Is Inevitable - a Bad Death Is Not” July 4 - 5, 2018, Caesarea
    המכון הלאומי לחקר שרותי הבריאות ומדיניות הבריאות )ע”ר( The Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research International Workshop: “Death is Inevitable - A Bad Death is not” July 4 - 5, 2018, Caesarea The Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research +972-3-5303516 [email protected] www.israelhpr.org.il The Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research International Workshop Death is Inevitable - A Bad Death is not Chair: A. Mark Clarfield July 4-5, 2018 Caesarea , Israel Picture: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e4/Caesarea_maritima_R%C Death is Inevitable - A Bad Death is not Table of Contents Workshop Program 4 Introduction 6 List of Speakers & Chairpersons 7 Abstracts 9 Biographies 21 Article: The Dying Patient Act, 2005: Israeli Innovative Legislation 60 3 International Workshop International Workshop Death is Inevitable - A Bad Death is not Wednesday-Thursday, July 4-5, 2018, Dan Caesarea Hotel th Wednesday, July 4 , 2018 09:00-09:30 Gathering & Welcome Coffee 09:30-10:00 Opening session and Greetings Chair: A. Mark Clarfield, Ben-Gurion University Moshe Bar Siman Tov, Director General, Ministry of Health Orly Manor, Chair, Board of Directors, NIHP Pesach Shvartzman, Israel Palliative Medicine Association Tikva Meron, Tmicha - The Israeli Association of Palliative Care 10:00-11:30 Session 1: From whence have we come; to where we (might) be going Prof. Baroness Ilora Finlay, UK - House of Lords A short history of palliative care Dr. Daniel Sulmasy, US - Georgetown University Spiritual
    [Show full text]