DOCSLIB.ORG

Kingman and Mohave County, Arizona, 1860--1940

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kingman and Mohave County, Arizona, 1860--1940 UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1999 Town and hinterland: Kingman and Mohave County, Arizona, 1860--1940 Diana Roock Dever University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Dever, Diana Roock, "Town and hinterland: Kingman and Mohave County, Arizona, 1860--1940" (1999). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 3102. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/o3id-xiya This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a rx>te will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information arxt Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Artx>r, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TOWN AND HINTERLAND: KINOIAN AND MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA 1860-1940 by Diana Roock Dever Bachelor of Arts Monteith College Wayne state university, Detroit 1965 Master of Liberal Studies University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1981 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree Departs&ent of History College of Liberal Arts Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas August 2000 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number. 9989903 UMI UMI Microform9989903 Copyright 2001 by Bell & Howell Information and Leaming Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Leaming Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Dissertation Approval UNTV The Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas ■Tilly 6 ^20 00 The Dissertation prepared by Diana Roock Dever Entitled Town and Hinterland: Kingman and Mohave County. Arizona 1860-1960 is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy_______________________________________ Examination Committee Chair Dean of the Graduate College Examination Committee Member % Exar n Commitfee Member G/dduate College epresentative PR/10I7-52/I-00 u Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT Town and Hinterland: Kingman and Mohave County, 1860-1940 Diana R. Dever Dr. Eugene Moehring, Examination Committee Chair Professor of History University of Nevada, Las Vegas This work examines the complex socioeconomic relationship between a northwestern Arizona town and its hinterlemd from 1860-1940. During this time, Mohave County, Arizona experiences the inqpact of three industries: mining, ranching, and railroading. After 1882, mining boomtowns in the hinterland stimulate the growth of the Kingman rails iding, making it the only viable transshipment point in the county. The town's development relies on economic activities within its hinterland, national trends, and the character of its hardworking inhabitants, including its diverse racial and ethnic groups. Separate demographic profiles from 1900-1940 of Kingman and Mohave County's con^sition demonstrate changes that occur. Following the Crash of 1929, New Deal programs further energize the town's economy. The relation­ ship between Kingman êuid its hinterland throughout the town's evolution from a nineteenth century rail transshipment point to a twentieth century service center for trucking and tourism is a critical factor in the urbanization of northwestern Arizona. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT........................................ iii LIST OF FIGURES................................... iv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION............................. 1 CHAPTER 2 THE FRONTIER: 1860-1880................... 9 CHAPTER 3 THE DEVELOPMENT OF KINGMAN AND ITS MINING HINTERLAND: 1880s.............................. 53 CHAPTER 4 KINGMAN AND MOHAVE COUNTY IN THE 1890s....... 79 CHAPTER 5 URBANIZATION OF KINGMAN AND MOHAVE COUNTY: 1900-1930.................................... 120 CHAPTER 6 QUALITY OF LIFE: Kingman and Mohave County, A Demographic Profile, 1900-1930.................. 184 CHAPTER 7 KINOiAN AND MOHAVE COUNTY: 1930s........... 230 CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSION............................. 275 BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................... 289 VITA............................................ 303 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Population of Mohave County 1860-1880........ 35 Figure 2 Males and FemêLIes in Mohave County 1860-1880.. .36 Figure 3 Place of Birth-Mohave County 1860-1880....... 36 Figure 4 Average Age of Population of Mohave County 1860-1880................................. 39 Figure 5 Age Ranges for Mohave County 1860-1880....... 39 Figure 6 1889-1903 Cattle and Horses in Mohave County..104 Figure 7 Additional Livestock.......................105 Figure 8 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map Population....... 194 Figure 9 Kingman Sanborn Fire Insurance Map Data of Dwellings and Businesses 1898-1923.......... 195 Figure 10 Census of the United States: Mohave County and Kingman, Arizona.......................... 196 Figure 11 Males and Females in Mohave County 1900-1930..196 Figure 12 Males and Females in Kingman 1900-1930...... 199 Figure 13 Males :Females Age Range Kingman 1900-1920.... 199 Figure 14 Males : Females Age Range Mohave County 1900-1920................................ 200 Figure 15 Average Age of Females 1900-1920............ 201 Figure 16 Average Age of Males 1900-1920..............201 Figure 17 Kingman Children Under Fourteen Years 1900-1910................................ 202 Figure 18 Mohave County Hinterlemd Children Under Fourteen 1900-1910........................ 204 Figure 19 Marital Status in Kingman 1900-1920......... 205 Figure 20 Hinterland-Mcirital Status 1900-1920......... 206 Figure 21 Marital Relations-Hinterland 1900, 1920..... 207 Figure 22 Marital Relations-Kingman 1900, 1920........ 207 Figure 23 Mohave County: Lodgers, Boarders, and Roomers 1900-1920................................ 212 Figure 24 Ego's Place of Birth-Kingman 1900-1920...... 213 Figure 25 Ego's Place of Birth-Hinterland 1900-1920.... 214 Figure 25A Hispanic Population 1900-1920.............. 218 Figure 25B Asian Population 1900-1920................. 220 Figure 26 Mohave County's Male and Female Population 1930-1940................................ 262 Figure 27 Racial & Ethnic Conpostion of Mohave County's Population 1930-1940.......................263 Figure 28 Mohave County's Employment Status of Whites Over 14 Years Old 1930-1940................ 263 Figure 29 Marital Status of Mohave County 1930........ 266 IV Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION It is the last summer of the twentieth century in northwestern Arizona, and temperatures soar above 120 degrees. People along the Lower Colorado River seek relief in its cool waters or frequent the nearby casinos. Thirty- five miles east of the river in Kingman a local radio personalty pledges to walk naked down Beal Street if a fund­ raiser for the Special Olyn^ics is a success. Meanwhile, citizens and tourists of the neighboring ghost town of Oatman prepare for the annual July Fourth egg-fry on Route 66's pavement. At the same time in Lake Havasu City, now home of the old London Bridge, a civic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HUNTER INFORMATION SHEET DESERT BIGHORN Unit 266
    HUNTER INFORMATION SHEET DESERT BIGHORN Unit 266 LOCATION: Unit 266 is situated in southern Clark County and comprises the northern portion of the Eldorado Mountains. ELEVATION: Elevations range from 656' at lake level (Lake Mohave) to 3,773' above Oak Creek Canyon. TERRAIN: Topographic features vary from rolling hills on the western margin of bighorn sheep habitat to the sheer, vertical cliffs characteristic of Black Canyon. VEGETATION: Vegetation is typical of the Mojave Desert=s creosote bush scrub community. Prominent vegetative types within this community include creosote and white bursage. LAND STATUS: The majority of the area that offers opportunities to hunt bighorn sheep lies within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area, and is administered by the National Park Service. A minor portion of bighorn sheep habitat is within the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, Las Vegas District. HUNTER ACCESS: Hunter access is considered good given the network of National Park Service approved roads. Some hunters opt to use boats to learn their area, and to access points which would otherwise be more difficult to reach on foot. Note: Please be aware that sections of this unit are in a wilderness area. Motorized equipment, mechanized transport, including wheeled game carriers and chainsaws, are prohibited in wilderness areas. Contact the Federal Management Agency responsible for this area for more information. MAP REFERENCE: Maps are available for purchase from BLM, or through private vendors such as Mercury Blueprint & Supply Co. (Las Vegas), Desert Outfitters (Las Vegas) or Oakman=s (Reno). At a minimum, hunters should possess the United States Geologic Survey, Boulder City 1:100,000-scale topographic map (30 x 60 minute quadrangle).
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08
    Prepared in cooperation with the Arizona Department of Water Resources Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08 Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: View of August 2010, monsoon thunderstorm over Hualapai Mountains, looking east from Sacramento Valley. Photo by Bradley D. Garner. Prepared in cooperation with the Arizona Department of Water Resources Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08 By Bradley D. Garner and Margot Truini Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Garner, B.D., and Truini, Margot, 2011, Groundwater budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5159, 34 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Mojave Indian Tribe Tribal State Gaming Compact
    FORT MOJAVE INDIAN TRIBE AND STATE OF ARIZONA GAMING COMPACT 2002 THE FORT MOJAVE INDIAN TRIBE - STATE OF ARIZONA GAMING COMPACT DECLARATION OF POLICY AND PURPOSE .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 SECTION1. TITLE .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 SECTION2. DEFINITIONS . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 SECTION 3. NATURE, SIZE AND CONDUCT OF CLASS Ill GAMING . .. .. .. .. 8 (a) Authorized Class Ill Gaming Activities . .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 (b) Appendices Governing Gaming .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 (c) Number of Gaming Device Operating Rights and Number of Gaming Facilities .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 ( d) Transfer of Gaming Device Operating Rights . .. .. .. .. .. .. 12 (e) Number of Card Game Tables .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16 (f) Number of Keno Games .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16 (g) Inter-Tribal Parity Provisions .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16 (h) Additional Gaming Due to Changes in State Law with Respect to Persons Other Than Indian Tribes. .. .. .. .. .. .. 18 (i) Notice .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 19 0) Location of Gaming Facility . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 19 (k) Financial Services in Gaming Facilities .. .. .. .. .. .. 19 (I) Forms of Payment for Wagers .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 20 (m) Wager Limitations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 20 (n) Hours of Operation .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 20 (o) Ownership of Gaming Facilities and Gaming Activities . .. .. .. 20 (p) Prohibited Activities ........................................ 21 (q ) Operation as Part of a Network . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21 (r) Prohibition
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Long-Range Transportation Plan for the Colorado River Indian
    2014 Strategic Long Range Transportation Plan for the Colorado River Indian Tribes Final Report Prepared by: Prepared for: COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES APRIL 2014 Project Management Team Arizona Department of Transportation Colorado River Indian Tribes 206 S. 17th Ave. 26600 Mohave Road Mail Drop: 310B Parker, Arizona 85344 Phoenix, AZ 85007 Don Sneed, ADOT Project Manager Greg Fisher, Tribal Project Manager Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Telephone: 602-712-6736 Telephone: (928) 669-1358 Mobile: (928) 515-9241 Tony Staffaroni, ADOT Community Relations Project Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: (602) 245-4051 Project Consultant Team Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 333 East Wetmore Road, Suite 280 Tucson, AZ 85705 Mary Rodin, AICP Email: [email protected] Telephone: 520-352-8626 Mobile: 520-256-9832 Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc. 21636 N. Dietz Drive Maricopa, Arizona 85138 Sharon Morris, President Email: [email protected] Telephone: 520-316-6745 This report has been funded in part through financial assistance from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data, and for the use or adaptation of previously published material, presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers’ names that may appear herein are cited only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub
    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • D J -B Vy Li' /^/ RECEIVED 2280 Q] NFS Form 10-900 *B Fl 0 (Rev
    D j -b vy Li' /^/ RECEIVED 2280 Q] NFS Form 10-900 *B fl 0 (Rev. 10-90) OCT United States Department of the Inte: •ior FE82 81996 National Park Service if NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NAT REGISTE H STQRIC PLACES NATION/1% * I SERVICE „ NATIONAL PARK SERV,. • REGISTRATION FORM jjAriONAL REGISTER Rfte This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties—' and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Camp Date Creek 1868-1873 other names/site number Camp McPherson 1867-1868 2. Location street & number SE1/4 Sec. 30, NE1/4 Sec. 31, T11N,R6W / /not for publication______ city or town Hawkins area in vicinity of Hawkins Ranch and Date Creek___/X/ Vicinity between the present towns of Hillside and Congress____________________________ state Arizona code AZ county Yavapai code 025 zip code none* *Nearest P.O. is Congress, AZ 85332 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property No. of Resources w/in Property /X/ private /X/ building(s) Contributing Noncontributing / / public-local / / district __ ___ buildings /X/ public-State /X/ site 1 ___ sites / / public-Federal / / structure __ _____ structures / / object ______ objects I Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: Q 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohave County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Mohave County Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Background and Scope ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Assurances ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Plan Organization ........................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY PROFILES ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Mohave County ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Bullhead City ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Colorado City ................................................................................................................................ 19 2.4 Kingman ........................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Knigman General Plan Update 2030
    II .0. Jj1! IOn City of Knigman General Plan Update 2030 Mayor and Com.non Council Janet Vatson, Mayor Carole Young, Vice-Mayor Richard Aiaderson, Councilmenaber Lawrence Carver, Councilmenaber Erm Cochran, Councilmember Jennee Miles, Councilmember Mark Wunpee, Sr. Councilmember 1’laimmg and Zoning Commission Matthew Ladendecker, Chair Allen Mossberg, Vice-Chair Mike Blair, Commissioner Dana Harvey, Commissioner Eugene Kirkham, Com.nissioner Vicki Kress, Commissioner Dustm Lewis, CommissioHer March 2014 -4 t’ •,,4 ** 4 - ‘4 3444341 ! . 3- .-. _: $4 ‘,,•‘ - - - ;‘44a., 444 -- * 2’ 4 -ra..-,, 4 ‘--34 4:44 - -:4-’; 43• 444$; 3 4- $3. 4., ‘:• 43 . 4€; - 3 44 4- 3 .4 ‘-J. ‘$3 -a 3-. - 4-’. 4+,. -, .4 • . - ‘-‘-3 -. —4. •• •• • ..- 4• •‘ a. 4. 4 • ‘-44$ t- 4’.- • •: • 4. 444 4 j, 4-4 •; •• • -r 4- -4 ‘ :- - — — 4’,-- — •4H •.. ‘3’ 1 -:44 • • • . • 4 44 $ 44-4 .4, a, ‘.4’ • . • • • - TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Land Use Element Page 1 Growth Area Element Page 1 Redevelopment and Public Facilities and Buildings Element Page 4 Circulation Element Page 6 Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space Element Page 7 Cost of Development Page 10 Environmental Planning Page 12 CHAPTER 2: DEMOGRAPHICS 2010 Census Page 17 Racial Composition Page 17 Education Page 17 Housing Page 17 Income Page 18 Vehicles Page 18 Poverty Page 18 Economy Page 18 Aviation Page 19 Energy Page 20 Healthcare Services Page 20 Manufacturing Page 20 Mining Page 21 Motorsports Page 21 Transportation and Logistics Page 21 2015 Demographic Projection Page 22 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Affected Environment
    3. Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction This chapter provides a description of the existing social, economic, and environmental settings for the area affected by the three build alternatives and the No Build Alternative. The affected environment is described for each resource of concern in the Boulder City/ U.S. 93 Corridor Study project area. The discussion contains study methodologies, background information, descriptive data, issues, and values that have a bearing on possible impacts and mitigation measures (described in detail in Chapter 4) and on the selection of the preferred alternative. This EIS was prepared consistent with National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 1500. et seq) and the FHWA Guidance for Preparing and Processing Environmental and Section 4(f) Documents (FHWA Technical Advisory T 6640.8A, October 30, 1987). This guidance lists potentially adverse impacts most commonly encountered by highway projects and directs that these factors should be discussed for each reasonable alternative where a potential for impact exists. Environmental and socioeconomic factors potentially impacted by the proposed project are analyzed in detail in this chapter. Factors that were found to have no potential for project-related impacts and are not discussed in this chapter are as follows: x Joint Development x Farmland x Wild and Scenic Rivers x Coastal Barriers x Coastal Zone Impacts The following additional technical studies were prepared for the Boulder City/U.S. 93 Corridor Study DEIS, and they are available through NDOT (contact Daryl James at 775/888-7013 for additional information): x Air Quality x Noise x Biological Resources x Water Quality x Wetlands x Floodplains x Archaeological Resources x Historic Resources x Land Use x Visual Resources x Economics x Social Impacts x Hazardous Waste T012004001SCO/ DRD1333.DOC/ 050740004 3-1 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonology and Dictionary of Yavapai
    Phonology and Dictionary of Yavapai By Alan William Shaterian A.B. (Syracuse University) 1963 C.Phil. (University of California) 1973 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Approved: Chairmai Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. YAVAPAI PHONOLOGY AND DICTIONARY Copyright @ 1983 by Alan Shaterian Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DEDICATION For Jeanie Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. YAVAPAI PHONOLOGY AND DICTIONARY by Alan Shaterian ABSTRACT This work will preserve the fundamental facts about the Yavapai language, the most evanescent of the Pai group of Yuman languages, a linguistic family which in its vari­ ety of members and geographic distribution is analagous to the Germanic family as of five centuries ago. The dis­ sertation explores the relationship between the pattern of speech sounds and the shape of words in Yavapai. It de­ scribes the phonology, morphology, and a part of the lex­ icon in a format which is accessible to linguists of varied theoretical backgrounds. It is the speech of Chief Grace Jimulla Mitchell (1903-1976), a speaker of the Prescott subdialect of North­ eastern Yavapai, that forms the basis of the description. The research necessary for this undertaking was spon­ sored in part by the Survey of California and Other Indian Languages at the University of California at Berkeley. The Introduction surveys the field of Yavapai and Pai studies and places them within the deeper perspective of 1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • River Cities VISITOR & RELOCATION GUIDE
    DINING REAL ESTATE RECREATION EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT HEALTH Relocating to the River Cities VISITOR & RELOCATION GUIDE Bullhead City | Laughlin | Fort Mohave | Mohave Valley | Needles Relocating to the EXPERIENCE River Cities AWARD-WINNING EXCITEMENT! Best Casino PLAY – Casino Player Magazine Best Hotel Best Overall Gaming Resort STAY – Casino Player Magazine Best Overall Dining DINE – Casino Player Magazine CALL TODAY TO MAKE YOUR RESERVATION AND WE’LL WELCOME YOU TO THE RIVER 800.950.7700 GOLDENNUGGET.COM Relocating to the River Cities VISITOR & RELOCATION GUIDE CONTENTS DINING 4 REAL ESTATE 8 RECREATION 12 EDUCATION 22 DEVELOPMENT 28 HEALTH 32 Relocating to the River Cities VISITOR & RELOCATION GUIDE Relocating to the River Cities LARRY KENDRICK General Manager | WELLS ANDREWS Sales/Circulation Director BILL MCMILLEN Editorial | ERIC FRAKES Operations Manager | JASON LORD Layout & Design ADVERTISING: Jody Bristyan, CAREY FEARING, JAMIE MCCORKLE, NANCY Novak, LU WEISS PRODUCTION: BEN KANE Prepress Manager, MICHAEL KENITZER Relocating to the River Cities is published and distributed annually. The Bullhead Area Chamber of Commerce contributed to this magazine and will make the guide available online and at their local office. Call the chamber at (928) 754-4121 to request by mail. Although every attempt is to be as accurate as possible, News West Publishing is not responsible for any errors, misprints, omissions, or accuracy of the stories in this publication. ©2019 News West Publishing, Inc News West Publishing | 2435 Miracle Mile, P.O. Box 21209, Bullhead City, AZ 86442 | 928.763.2505 | www.MohaveDailyNews.com 3 DINING The River Cities are home to a wide variety of fantastic restaurants suited for any taste.
    [Show full text]
  • Ca-Lower-Colorado-River-Valley-Pkwy
    I • I I I ) I I A REPORT TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES ---1 I 'I I I I THE LOWER I COLORADO I RIVER I VALLEY • PARKWAY I I D- '°'le> F; 1-e. ·• NFS- ' f\CAc:.+... \ V"C. , ~ P,of>oseol I ~~~~=-'~c f~l~~c~~w I THE LOWER COLORADO I filVERVALLEYPARKWAY I I I A proposal for a National Parkway and Scenic Recreation Road System along the Lower Colorado River Valley in 'I California, Arizona, and Nevada. I NATIONAL PARK .i DENVER SEfiViC I ·-.-:. a.t ..1flkllb""ll.--';,.i. n II"~ r.· " •· \..' ;: · I ;:~::::.;.;:;.:J I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service I in cooperation with Lower Colorado River Office Bureau of Land Management • PLE~\SE RtTUR?j TO: I February 1969 I , lJnited States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY I WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 I I Dear Mr. President: We are pleased to transmit herewith. a report on the feasibility anc;l desirability of developing a nation~l p;;i.rkwa,y and sc;enic recreation I road system within. the Lower C9l9rado River· Vaiiey in Arizona, Califo~nia, and Nevada, from the Lake Mead National Recreation I Area and Davis Dam on the north to the International Boup.d:;i.ry ~ith Mexico on the south in: the vicinity of San Luis, Arizqna arid Mexic.o.· . ·. ' .. ·.' . ·. I This :i;eport is based on ci. study 11,'lade by the Lower Col<;>rado River Office ap.d the NatiQnal :Par~ Service pf this Depa.rtmep.t with engineerin.g assistance by the Buqlau of Public Roads of the Departmep.t of .
    [Show full text]