Compilation of Records of Surface Waters of the United States Through September 1950 Part 3-B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Compilation of Records of Surface Waters of the United States Through September 1950 Part 3-B Compilation of Records of Surface Waters of the United States through September 1950 Part 3-B. Cumberland and Tennessee River Basins GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1306 Compilation of Records of Surface Waters of the United States through September 1950 Part 3-B. Cumberland and Tennessee River Basins Prepared under the direction of J. V. B. WELLS, chief, Surface Water Branch GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1306 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. S EATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. PREFACE This report contains summaries of streamflow records in the Cum­ berland and Tennessee River basins. It was prepared by the United States Geological Survey in the Water Resources Division, C. G. Paulsen, chief, under the general direction of J. V. B. Wells, chief, Surface Water Branch, and B. J. Peterson, chief, Basic Records Section. The data were compiled under general supervision of P. R. Speer, project engineer, by personnel in district offices under supervision of district engineers, Surface Water Branch, as follows: W. R. Eaton________________________Chattanooga, Tenn. E. B. Rice_____________________________Raleigh, N. C. F. F. Schrader__________________________Louisville, Ky. D. S. Wallace________________________Charlottesville, Va. in CONTENTS [See bar chart, p. 15-19 for list of gaging stations and individual page numbers in this report] Page Purpose and scope....................................... 1 Stream-gaging program .................................. 2 Description of data ...................................... 4 Publications ............................................ 9 Hydrologic conditions .................................... 13 Bar chart............................................... 15 Gaging-station records................................... 20 Index. .................................................. 349 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate 1. Map showing location of gaging stations. ..... In pocket Figure 1. Map of United States showing area covered by this report .............................. 11 2. Yearly discharge at three representative gaging stations in the area covered by this report .... 14 V COMPILATION OF RECORDS OF SURFACE WATERS OF CUMBERLAND AND TENNESSEE RIVER BASINS, THROUGH 1950 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This volume is one of a series of reports presenting monthly and yearly summaries of streamflow and reservoir data collected by the Geological Survey. Included with these data are some records furnished by other Federal, State, and private agencies. The purpose of this series of reports is to make available in summarized form all of the surface-water records collected up to September 30, 1950. The first known streamflow records to be systematically col­ lected in the United States are those for Eaton and Madison Brooks in Madison County, N. Y. , by John B. Jervis during 1835. Stream gaging by the United States Geological Survey was begun in 1888. At that time the Congress authorized the Irrigation Sur­ vey to be conducted by the Geological Survey in connection with special studies relating to irrigation. The work consisted of the measurement of stage and discharge of a few streams in the West. Since that time the work has expanded so that measurements of stage and discharge of streams and of stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs have been made at more than 12, 000 gaging sta­ tions in the 48 states and the territories of Hawaii and Alaska, of which about 6,400 were in operation on September 30, 1950. The details of the records collected at those stations are contained in annual reports, bulletins, and water-supply papers, which have been issued usually on an annual basis. Most of the records col­ lected over the years are found only in numerous individual vol­ umes, many of which are out of print and difficult to obtain. The records have been collected mainly in cooperation with State, municipal, and other Federal cooperating agencies and published in annual reports by the Geological Survey. This series of compilation reports has been prepared by the Geological Survey as a special project not included in the cooperative program. 2 COMPILATION OF SURFACE WATER RECORDS, PART 3-B The data presented in this series of reports consist of records of discharge of streams and contents of reservoirs summarized on a monthly and yearly basis. Results of miscellaneous dis­ charge measurements and, in general, stage records have been excluded. Also included are bar charts showing the period of record covered by each gaging station and a map of the area showing the location of each station (pi. 1). The reports of this series are uniform in the type of data they contain and in the form of presentation. In compiling the data for these summary reports, one important feature of the project was to review the analyses and computations originally made on the basis of all information now available. For some stations additional base data, obtained subsequently, allowed for reinterpretation and recomputation of more accurate records of discharge. All records were examined for major computation errors and tested wherever possible by comparison with records of discharge at other stations and weather data. Records that were found to be in need of substantial revision were recomputed or omitted if revision was not feasible. Estimates of discharge were made to fill short gaps to complete the continuity of the record, wherever practical. Records furnished by other agencies are incorporated in these reports when they supplement records collected by the Geological Survey, and appeared consistent and reliable. Furnished records were reviewed in the same manner as Geological Survey records whenever base data were available and detailed study was feasible. STREAM-GAGING PROGRAM The area covered by this report (fig. 1), which includes the Cumberland and Tennessee River basins, extends from the west­ ern slopes of the Appalachian Mountains westward across the Cumberland Plateau to the eastern borders of the lower Missis­ sippi River basin. The drainage area of the headwaters of the Tennessee River includes areas of the highest precipitation in the eastern part of the United States where the mean annual pre­ cipitation exceeds 80 inches in the highest altitudes. The control of floods, navigation, and water power provided the impetus for the earliest observation of stream flow in the area. The earliest records on the streams in the area covered by this report were begun as records of stage by the Army Signal Corps from which records of discharge were later computed by the Geological Survey when sufficient discharge measurements be­ came available to define the ratings. The first such gage was STREAM-GAGING PROGRAM O established on the Tennessee River at Florence, Ala., in 1871. This was followed closely by gages on the Cumberland River at Nashville, Tenn. , in 1873, Tennessee River at Chattanooga, Tenn. , in 1874, and the Tennessee River at Johnsonville, Tenn., in 1875. The operation of these gages was taken over by the Weather Bureau in 1891. The Geological Survey began to collect records of stream flow in the summer of 1893 when the first discharge measurement was made on the Tennessee River at Chattanooga, Tenn. In 1897 measurements were begun on a regular basis at this station, and records of discharges from January 1890 were computed and published using measurements made in 1893 by the LL S. Weather Bureau. At a later date this discharge record was extended back to the beginning of the gage-height record in 1874, and thus be­ comes the longest continuous record of discharge in the area. Similar discharge records have been compiled for the Tennessee River at Johnsonville, Tenn., since 1889, the Cumberland River at Nashville, Tenn., since 1893, and the Tennessee River at Florence, Ala., since 1894. The work in Alabama and Tennessee by the Geological Survey was followed closely by the establishment of four stations in North Carolina during 1895 96, four stations in Virginia in 1907, and three stations in Kentucky in 1915. The first observation of discharge recorded in the area was made in 1883 by the Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army, on the Cumberland River at Nashville, Tenn. , and from that date until 1909 the Corps of Engineers made many discharge measurements at several points on the Cumber­ land and Tennessee Rivers. During the latter part of the neneteenth century water power became of major importance to the southeastern states, and in 1895 the Geological Survey began the first State cooperative stream-gaging program in the area with the State of North Carolina. This cooperation was continued through 1909. The rapid development of water power and the widespread movement for the acquisition by the Government of the forested lands within the Southern Appalachians for the conservation and regulation of the water supply and flow of streams resulted in a rapid ex­ pansion of the program on the headwaters during 1900. This ex­ pansion was augmented by cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service during 1907-9. In 1911 and 1918 the Geological Survey cooperated with the State of Tennessee on the establishment of severalsta- tions, and in 1918 the cooperative program with the State of North Carolina was resumed. Since then the program has expanded to include all the States in the area. 4 COMPILATION OF SURFACE WATER RECORDS, PART 3-B The area periodically
Recommended publications
  • NENHC 2008 Abstracts
    Abstracts APRIL 17 – APRIL 18, 2008 A FORUM FOR CURRENT RESEARCH The Northeastern Naturalist The New York State Museum is a program of The University of the State of New York/The State Education Department APRIL 17 – APRIL 18, 2008 A FORUM FOR CURRENT RESEARCH SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR CITING ABSTRACTS: Abstracts Northeast Natural History Conference X. N.Y. State Mus. Circ. 71: page number(s). 2008. ISBN: 1-55557-246-4 The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ALBANY, NY 12230 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University ROBERT M. BENNETT, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. ................................................................. Tonawanda MERRYL H. TISCH, Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ................................................. New York SAUL B. COHEN, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.................................................................................. New Rochelle JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. .................................................................. Peru ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. ..................................................................................... Syracuse GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ................................................................... Belle Harbor ARNOLD B. GARDNER, B.A., LL.B. .................................................................................. Buffalo HARRY PHILLIPS, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. ............................................................................. Hartsdale JOSEPH E. BOWMAN, JR., B.A.,
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications
    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 23 Aquatic Resources and Ecology
    NEXTera® ENERGY. RESOURCES EAST POINT ENERGY CENTER Case No. 17-F-0599 1001.23 Exhibit 23 Water Resources and Aquatic Ecology Contents Exhibit 23: Water Resources and Aquatic Ecology ...................................................................... 1 23(a) Groundwater ................................................................................................................1 (1) Hydrologic Character ................................................................................................ 1 (2) Map of Groundwater Aquifers and Groundwater Recharge Areas ............................ 2 (3) Impacts on Groundwater Quality and Quantity ......................................................... 3 (4) Private Well Survey Results ..................................................................................... 5 23(b) Surface Water .............................................................................................................5 (1) Surface Water Map .................................................................................................. 5 (2) Surface Water Characteristics .................................................................................. 5 (3) Downstream Drinking Water Supply Intakes ............................................................. 9 (4) Surface Water Impacts ............................................................................................. 9 (5) Groundwater Mitigation Methods .............................................................................13 (6) Surface
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County Countywide Resiliency Plan
    NYRCR MONTGOMERY COUNTY NY RISING COUNTYWIDE RESILIENCY PLAN July 2014 NY Rising Community Reconstruction Program This page intentionally left blank Montgomery County NYRCR Planning Committee Name Position Group/Organization Dustin Swanger Co-Chair Fulton-Montgomery Community College Denis Wilson Co-Chair Fulmont Community Action Agency Ann Black Member Fulmont Community Action Agency Paul Clayburn Member Montgomery County Department of Public Works American Red Cross, Northeastern New York Region, Angelika Klapputh Member Albany, NY Michael McMahon Member Montgomery County Department of Social Services Corey Nellis Member Montgomery County Soil and Water Conservation District Matt Ossenfort Member Montgomery County Executive Office Frederick Quist Member United Way of Montgomery County Nancy Ryan Member Fort Plain Reformed Church Jeffery Smith Member Montgomery County Emergency Management Office PREPARED BY This document was developed by the NYRCR Montgomery County Planning Committee as part of the NY Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) Program and is supported by the NYS Department of State. The document was prepared by the following Consultant Team: AKRF, Inc.; Nagle, Tatich, Cranston LLC d/b/a Elan.3.Consulting (E.3); MJ Engineering and Land Surveying, PC; and CDM Smith, Inc. i This page intentionally left blank Foreword Introduction Flooding from severe summer storms in 2013 inflicted damages in five upstate counties, bringing home the reality that it no longer takes a hurricane or tropical storm for raging flood waters to wreak havoc in our communities. Those summer storms – as well as Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Irene, and Tropical Storm Lee – signal that we need to rebuild our com- munities in a way that will mitigate against future risks and build increased resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Schohariebridgedata
    NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021 Schoharie County Year Date BIN Built or of Last Poor Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspectio Status n 09 Schoharie Blenheim (Town) 1020930 8.1 MI N OF DELAWARE CL 30 30 95021080 WESTKILL CREEK NYSDOT 1994 09/15/2020 N 09 Schoharie Blenheim (Town) 1020940 9.1 MI NE OF DELAWARE CL 30 30 95021090 SCHOHARIE CREEK NYSDOT 2005 09/26/2019 N 09 Schoharie Blenheim (Town) 1078540 0.2 MI N North Blenheim 30 30 95021092 DEVILS RUN NYSDOT 2005 09/26/2019 N 09 Schoharie Blenheim (Town) 3355240 2.5 MI N OF N BLENHEIM BEAR LADDER ROAD COLE HOLLOW BROOK 30 - County 1935 04/22/2021 N 09 Schoharie Blenheim (Town) 3355270 2.5 MI WEST OF N BLENHEIM COUNTY ROAD 2 MILL CREEK 30 - County 1983 03/09/2020 N 09 Schoharie Blenheim (Town) 3355280 2.5 MI WEST OF N.BLENHEIM COUNTY ROAD 2 MILL CREEK 30 - County 1990 10/16/2019 N 09 Schoharie Blenheim (Town) 3355260 1.5 MI WEST OF N BLENHEIM COUNTY ROAD 2 MILL CREEK 30 - County 1995 11/20/2019 N 09 Schoharie Blenheim (Town) 3355250 1 MI W OF N BLENHEIM CREAMERY ROAD WEST KILL CREEK 30 - County 1928 07/10/2020 N 09 Schoharie Broome (Town) 1038240 1.8 MI NW OF ALBANY CL 145 145 95031018 LAKE CREEK NYSDOT 1931 03/25/2021 N 09 Schoharie Broome (Town) 3354880 5 MI SE OF BROOME CENTER BATES CHURCH ROAD TRIB CATSKILL CRK 30 - County 2019 12/23/2019 N 09 Schoharie Broome (Town) 3354870 0.9 MI SE LIVINGSTONEVILL CC CAMP ROAD CATSKILL CREEK 30 - County 2014 03/09/2021 N 09 Schoharie Broome (Town) 3354840 CR19A - .3 MI W CO LINE COUNTY
    [Show full text]
  • NY State Bridge Data
    NY State Highway Bridge Data: October 31, 2011 Montgomery County Year Date NYS Built or of Last SD/FO Condition Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspection Status Rating 02 Montgomery Ames (Village) 2.2 MI S JCT RTS 163 & 10 10 10 25031013 BRIMSTONE CREEK NYSDoT 1994 08/16/2010 N 6.45 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) .6 MI N JCT SH 5S & SH 3 30 30 2502R200 MINAVILLE STREET NYSDoT 1960 04/06/2010 N 5.27 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) IN SOUTH AMSTERDAM 30 30 25042001 90I @ MP 173.86 NYS Thruway Authority 1953 06/16/2011 FO 5.03 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) .5 MI N JCT SH 5S & SH 30 30 30 25042008 CLEVELAND AVENUE NYSDoT 1960 10/01/2010 FO 5.33 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) 0.2 MI S JCT RTS 5 & 30 30 30 25042009 E.W.ARTERIAL NYSDoT 1973 12/29/2009 FO 4.67 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) 02MI S JCT RTS 5+30 30 30 25042011 E.W ARTERIAL NYSDoT 1973 10/29/2009 SD 4.90 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) 02MI S JCT RTS 5+30 30 30 25042V09 E.W.ARTERIAL NYSDoT 1973 08/19/2009 FO 5.78 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) .1MI.NW JCT.RT30&MOHAWK R 5 5 25122020 CHUCTANUNDA CREEK NYSDoT 1971 07/21/2011 N 5.56 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) 0.3 MI NE JCT RT30&MOHK R 5 5 25122419 CHUCTANUNDA CREEK NYSDoT 1979 09/28/2009 N 5.44 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) 0.9 MI W JCT RTS 5S & 30 5S 5S25032001 FLORIDA AVENUE NYSDoT 1956 04/26/2010 N 5.53 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) 1.0 MI W JCT RTS 5S & 160 5S 5S25032010 30 30 25042004 NYSDoT 1960 07/20/2010 N 5.06 02 Montgomery Amsterdam (City) JCT OF SH 30 & SH 67 67 67
    [Show full text]
  • NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021
    NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021 Montgomery County Year Date BIN Built or of Last Poor Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspectio Status n N 02 Montgome Ames (Village) 1007920 2.2 MI S JCT RTS 163 & 10 10 10 25031013 BRIMSTONE CREEK NYSDOT 1994 10/28/2020 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1090340 .1MI.NW JCT.RT30&MOHAWK R 5 5 25122020 CHUCTANUNDA CREEK NYSDOT 1971 08/01/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1068860 0.3 MI NE JCT RT30&MOHK R 5 5 25122419 CHUCTANUNDA CREEK NYSDOT 1979 10/22/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1002950 0.9 MI W JCT RTS 5S & 30 5S 5S25032001 FLORIDA AVENUE NYSDOT 1956 07/20/2020 ry Y 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1002960 1.0 MI W JCT RTS 5S & 160 5S 5S25032010 30 2504 2004 Southbound NYSDOT 1960 09/24/2020 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1021080 .6 MI N JCT SH 5S & SH 3 30 30 2502R200 MINAVILLE STREET NYSDOT 1960 09/24/2020 ry Y 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1021079 .5 MI N JCT SH 5S & SH 30 30 30 25042008 CLEVELAND AVENUE NYSDOT 1960 11/30/2020 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 4425059 0.2 MI S JCT RTS 5 & 30 30 30 25042009 E.W.ARTERIAL NYSDOT 1973 12/12/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 442505A 02MI S JCT RTS 5+30 30 30 25042011 E W ARTERIAL NYSDOT 1973 11/25/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1051890 JCT OF RTS 67+30 30 30 25042014 67 67 25022024 NYSDOT 1969 12/17/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 442505B 02MI S JCT RTS 5+30 30 X E W ARTERIAL NYSDOT 1973 11/25/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1051910 JCT OF SH 30 & SH
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Tennessee
    TENNESSEE WI LDLl FE RESOURCES AGENCY ELL1NGTON AGRICULTURAL CENTER P. 0.BOX 40747 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37204 February 26,2003 Water Docket U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mailcode 4 101 T 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460 Attention: Docket ID No. OW-2002-0050 03-03-03 A10:43 JN Re: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemalung U.S. Environmental Protection Agency US. Army Corps of Engineers Definition of “Water of the United States” Attention: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). The Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency provides the following comments and recommendations regarding the EPNCOE proposal to change the accepted and customary definition of “Waters of the United States” to remove Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) protection for isolated wetlands and non-navigable streams. Removal of CWA protection for isolated wetlands and non-navigable streams would drastically change more than three decades of progress toward restoring and protecting waters of the United States. This would be a significant retreat from the goals of the CWA and should be addressed through preparation of a comprehensive evaluation of the consequences. 0 Consideration should be given to amending the CWA to insure the definition of “Waters of the United States” is consistent with the customary and accepted usage of the term as The State of Tennessee AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ,­ established since passage of the CWA. e Removal of federal CWS protection for isolated wetlands effectively abandons the long- standing national policy of “no overall net loss” of wetlands. The national goal of conservation and protection of wetlands resources is based on appreciation for the benefits derived, including water quality and quantity, flood control, waterfowl, and sustained biological diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Kootenai River Basin Watershed Restoration Plan
    KOOTENAI RIVER BASIN WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN by Jeff Dunn, Watershed Hydrologist Karen Filipovich, Outreach Consultant Gary Ingman, Water Resources Scientist Zac Collins, GIS Analyst prepared by RESPEC 3810 Valley Commons Drive, Suite 4 Bozeman, Montana 59718 prepared for Kootenai River Network PO Box 491 Libby, Montana 59923 December 23, 2015 Cover Photo: Kootenai Falls Photographer: Jeff Dunn Kootenai River Basin Watershed Restoration Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ v Attachments .................................................................................................................................................. v 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Kootenai River Network Mission Statement....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Kootenai River Basin Planning Partners .............................................................................................. 1 1.3 Impaired
    [Show full text]
  • MULTIPURPOSE WATER STORAGE SCREENING ASSESSMENT REPORT WRIA 30 Prepared For: WRIA 30 Planning Unit
    MULTIPURPOSE WATER STORAGE SCREENING ASSESSMENT REPORT WRIA 30 Prepared for: WRIA 30 Planning Unit Project No. 020070-002-05 June 20, 2003 ASPECT CONSULTING Contents 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Results from Level 1 Water Quantity Assessment..............................................1 1.2 Assessment Objectives .........................................................................................3 1.3 Overview of Conceptual Water Storage Opportunities .......................................4 1.3.1 Enhanced Groundwater Recharge.................................................................4 1.3.2 Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) ............................................................6 1.3.3 On-Channel Dam ............................................................................................7 1.3.4 Off-Channel Impoundment .............................................................................9 1.3.5 Permitting ......................................................................................................12 1.3.6 DNR Water Types.........................................................................................14 2 April 2003 Field Data Collection ...........................................................................16 2.1 Swale Creek Subbasin ........................................................................................18 2.2 Little Klickitat Subbasin ........................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Economic Development Council Awards
    Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Regional EconomicAwards Development Council 2017 1 Table of Contents Regional Council Awards Western New York .........................................................................................................................10 Finger Lakes ...................................................................................................................................24 Southern Tier ..................................................................................................................................36 Central New York ..........................................................................................................................48 Mohawk Valley ...............................................................................................................................62 North Country .................................................................................................................................74 Capital Region ................................................................................................................................85 Mid-Hudson .....................................................................................................................................98 New York City ................................................................................................................................ 114 Long Island ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cordell Hull Lake Water Quality Management Plan
    CORDELL HULL LAKE WATERSHED (05130106) OF THE CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION Presented to the people of the Cordell Hull Lake Watershed by the Division of Water Pollution Control October 16, 2007. Prepared by the Cookeville Environmental Field Office staff And the Nashville Central Office, Watershed Management Section: Richard Cochran David Duhl Regan McGahen Josh Upham Jennifer Watson Sherry Wang, Manager CORDELL HULL LAKE WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Summary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Cordell Hull Lake Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Cordell Hull Lake Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Cordell Hull Lake Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Cordell Hull Lake Watershed Chapter 6. Restoration Strategies Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology.
    [Show full text]