Wai L Rev 2018-1 Internals.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wai L Rev 2018-1 Internals.Indd Waikato Law Review Taumauri VOLUME 26, 2018 Aiming for Simplicity [Norris Ward McKinnon Lecture] 1 Hon Justice Robert Fisher Lecture Series Celebrating the 25th Anniversary of Te Piringa – Faculty of Law Biculturalism in the Law: The I, the Kua and the Ka 24 Hon Justice Christian Whata Lawyers: The Profession into the 21st Century 43 Hon Justice Christine Grice Teaching Law in Context: Is It Still Relevant? 51 Professor Margaret Wilson Letters to the Security Council by Two Prisoners of War, Israel and Palestine (I) 61 Dr Alberto Alvarez-Jimenez Protracted Armed Conflicts, Invisible Civilian Suffering and International Law (II) 76 Dr Alberto Alvarez-Jimenez Legitimate Business Rationale and Section 36 of the Commerce Act 1986 96 Paul G Scott The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: A Proposition For a Right to a Quality of Life Protection 117 Aaron McIlroy Book Review: New Treaty, New Tradition: Reconciling New Zealand and Māori Law 137 Season Mary Downs Editor in Chief Linda Te Aho Editorial Assistance Gay Morgan, Trevor Daya Winterbottom Senior Student Editor Philip McHugh Student Editors Nicole Morrall, Aref Shams, Cassidy McLean-House Editorial Advisory Board Chief Justice, The Honourable Dame Sian Elias (honorary member), Chief Justice of New Zealand. Professor John Borrows, JD (Toronto), PhD (Osgoode Hall), LL.D (Dalhousie), FRSC, Professor, Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Law, Nexen Chair in Indigenous Leadership, University of Victoria, (Canada). Associate Professor T Brettel Dawson, Department of Law, Carleton University, Academic Director, National Judicial Institute (Canada). Gerald Bailey, QSO, LLB (Cant), Hon D (Waikato), Consultant Evans Bailey, Lawyers, former Chancellor of University of Waikato and member of the Council of Legal Education. Sir David Baragwanath, Honorary Professor, University of Waikato, Judge of the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, The Hague. Professor John Farrar, LLB (Hons), LLM, LLD London, PhD Bristol, Emeritus Professor of Law, Bond University, Professor of Corporate Governance, University of Auckland. Deputy Chief Judge Caren Fox, Māori Land Court. Judge Stephanie Milroy, Māori Land Court. Dr Dame Joan Metge, Law and Society, with particular interests in law’s role in an ethnically diverse society. Professor Margaret Bedggood, QSO, LLB Otago, MA NZ and London, former Chief Human Rights Commissioner. The Honourable Justice Paul Heath, Judge of the High Court of New Zealand. The Honourable Sir Eddie Durie, KNZM, first Māori appointed as a Justice of the High Court of New Zealand, and leading legal expert on the Treaty of Waitangi. Professor Alex Frame, LLB Auck LLM, LLD Well, former Chair in Te Piringa – Faculty of Law, University of Waikato and Director of Te Matahauariki Research Institute. Professor Paul Hunt, Department of Law, University of Essex, member of the Human Rights Centre, University of Essex and Adjunct Professor, University of Waikato. The Honorable Justice Joseph Williams, Judge of the High Court of New Zealand. Judge Peter Spiller, Honorary Professor of Law, University of Waikato. Associate Professor Morne Olivier, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand. Professor Michael Hahn, Chair of European Law, University of Lausanne, Honorary Professor of Law, Te Piringa – Faculty of Law, University of Waikato. The Waikato Law Review is published annually by Te Piringa – Faculty of Law at The University of Waikato. Subscription to the Review costs $40 (domestic) and $45 (international) per year; and advertising space is available at a cost of $200 for a full page or $100 for a half page. Back numbers are available. Communications should be addressed to: The Editor Waikato Law Review Te Piringa – Faculty of Law Waikato University Private Bag 3105 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand North American readers should obtain subscriptions direct from the North American agents: Wm W Gault & Sons Inc 3011 Gulf Drive Holmes Beach Florida 34217-2199 USA This issue may be cited as (2018) 26 Wai L Rev. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be produced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any retrieval system, without permission from the Editor in Chief. ISSN 1172-9597 Introduction It is my pleasure to present the 2018 edition of the Waikato Law Review and the riches within. As is customary, the Norris Ward McKinnon Lecture takes pride of place on the first page of the Review. In this edition the Hon Justice Fisher takes the opportunity to convey the clear message that “the defining characteristic of great lawyers is their ability to simplify” and outlines ideas as to how lawyers, not noted for simplicity, might achieve this aspiration when drafting legal documents and legislation, when expressing legal views, and when teaching law. The Review then presents papers from a lecture series that celebrated the 25th Anniversary of Te Piringa, our Faculty of Law. Each lecture focussed on one of the founding principles of the Faculty: our bicultural commitment, professionalism, and teaching and researching law in context. In his lecture, the Hon Justice Whata acknowledges the commitment that Te Piringa – Faculty of Law has made to biculturalism from its inception and traces how the common law, after a lengthy period of glacial motion, has moved significantly in recent years to embrace a genuinely bicultural narrative. He concludes that while there is some distance to travel to achieve that goal, there is reason for optimism. Professor Margaret Wilson, the founding Dean of Te Piringa, explained why the Faculty’s goal of teaching law in context is still relevant in the face of contemporary challenges. Professor Wilson reminds us that legal rules are the output of a complex variety of factors. Teaching law in context allow students to recognise this complexity in order for them to fully appreciate the role and influence of law within a society. The Hon Justice Christine Grice, former President of the New Zealand Law Society, delivered a lecture on professionalism, emphasising the need for more diversity in the legal profession, and acknowledging the contribution that Te Piringa – Faculty of Law has made to diversity. An innovation in this edition is the publication of two interconnected articles by the same author, Alberto Alverez-Jimenez. The first article contains the essential human context for the second, which provides a legal analysis of how international humanitarian law and international criminal law could be interpreted in order to make civilian ordeals visible to the opponent. Without the powerful human content in article one, the legal analysis in article two would not have the level of understanding and impact that it does. The publication of the articles in this way reflects the unique culture at Te Piringa – Faculty of Law as demonstrated by its founding principles. Paul Scott, in his article on s 36 of the Commerce Act 1986, discusses New Zealand’s antimonopolisation provision and the usefulness of legitimate business rationale analysis in determining whether a firm’s conduct breaches s 36. It is always a pleasure to publish student work. In this edition, Aaron McIlroy investigates the development of a “quality of life approach” in human rights instruments, and Season Mary Downs reviews New Treaty, New Tradition: Reconciling New Zealand and Māori Law, by legal academic Carwyn Jones, Victoria University Press, 2016. I take this opportunity to whole-heartedly thank the editorial team and the peer reviewers for your valuable contributions. Publishing these important journals would not be possible without you. Ngā mihi me ngā manaakitanga, nā Linda Te Aho Editor in Chief The Norris Ward McKinnon Lecture Aiming for Simplicity By the Hon Justice Robert Fisher* I. Introduction This lecture has been given annually by current or former Governors-General, Prime Ministers, Ministers of Justice, Chief Justices and distinguished professors and judges. Tonight, you hear from a country lad raised nearby in Te Awamutu. But my roots at least equip me to talk about the topic for this evening. The topic is simplicity. Simplicity is an important topic for lawyers because: • evolution has left the human brain with marked limitations in its capacity to process information; • the only way we can work within those limitations is to keep things simple; • simplicity is achieved by identifying the intended audience, discarding the unnecessary, organising what is left, and communicating it efficiently; • lawyers are notorious for their failure on those fronts; • the only way lawyers can think clearly is to simplify; and • simplifying allows others to understand what lawyers are saying. This paper examines those propositions. The conclusion is clear: the defining characteristic of great lawyers is their ability to simplify. A. Limitations of the Human Brain 1. Origins of the human brain The brains of our ancestors were shaped by the natural world around them. They needed to interpret external phenomena if they were to achieve a relatively limited range of outcomes. Assessing terrain and vegetation would lead them to game and edible plants. Clouds, wind and temperature were a guide to expected weather. Interpreting the behaviour and expressions of others would promote the formation of extended families, the cooperative hunting of animals and the joint defence of territories. That was the environment in which our brains evolved. In evolutionary terms it was yesterday. Insufficient time has passed for our brains to evolve significantly since then. The point can be illustrated by the following facts: * Hon Robert Fisher QC, LLD, FAMINZ, arbitrator and mediator, Auckland, author, appellate judge Samoa and Cook Is, former NZ High Court Judge, Fulbright Scholar. My thanks are due to Auckland law graduate, Isabelle Boyd, for her research assistance. 2 Waikato Law Review Vol 26 • The current sapiens brain size (about 1200 ml) was reached about 300,000 years ago.1 • The current sapiens brain shape and organisation was reached about 35,000 – 100,000 years ago.2 • The Stone Age ended about 10,000 years ago.3 2.
Recommended publications
  • Public Defence Service an Important Influence on Criminal Law Practice
    ISSUE 933 · OCTOBER 2019 Public Defence Service An important influence on criminal law practice Reflections on a Pro bono legal Red flags! Is your US lawyers, ground –breaking services support law office as judges and Feminist Moot Canterbury healthy as you civil rights Muslim think? community Page 19 Page 42 Page 51 Page 72 Need Research? Use us as your legal research provider The NZLS Library, legal research and document delivery service is fast, e cient and thorough. With our extensive resources we can provide comprehensive cost-e ective searches of case law and commentary both in New Zealand and internationally. FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT OUR SERVICES: www.lawsociety.org.nz/law-library AUCKLAND [email protected] 304 1020 WELLINGTON [email protected] 473 6202 CANTERBURY [email protected] 377 1852 Photo by Sippanont Samchai Sippanont CC-By-NC-ND by Photo A BEQUEST TO THOSE WHO NEED IT MOST A Bequest to the Society of St Vincent The Society is a Catholic organisation de Paul is a lasting way to help the which recently celebrated 150 years most disadvantaged and needy in of compassion and service to the our community. people of New Zealand. Your Bequest will ensure the Society’s We have a nationwide network of vital work of charity and justice workers and helpers who provide continues to thrive. practical assistance every day to people in desperate situations. Help is offered Be assured it will make a huge to all, regardless of origin, cultural difference where the need is greatest. background or religious belief.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of New Zealand Decisions
    3/6/2020 Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited [2020] NZHC 419 (6 March 2020) Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback High Court of New Zealand Decisions You are here: NZLII >> Databases >> High Court of New Zealand Decisions >> 2020 >> [2020] NZHC 419 Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited [2020] NZHC 419 (6 March 2020) Last Updated: 6 March 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE CIV-2019-404-001730 [2020] NZHC 419 BETWEEN MICHAEL JOHN SMITH Plaintiff AND FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED First Defendant GENESIS ENERGY LIMITED Second Defendant DAIRY HOLDINGS LIMITED Third Defendant /Contd... Hearing: 3-4 February 2020 Appearances: D Salmon and D Bullock for Plaintiff D Kalderimis and N Swan for First Defendant S J P Ladd and B A Keown for Second Defendant J M Appleyard and A Hill for Third Defendant D T Broadmore and A N Birkinshaw for Fourth Defendant T Smith and A Lampitt for Fifth Defendant A J Horne and O K Brown for Sixth Defendant R J Gordon and A M B Leggat for Seventh Defendant Judgment: 6 March 2020 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF WYLIE J www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2020/419.html 1/28 3/6/2020 Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited [2020] NZHC 419 (6 March 2020) This judgment was delivered by Justice Wylie On 6 March 2020 at 11.30 am Pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date:.............................
    [Show full text]
  • PASSING the TORCH New Zealand’S New Chief Justice and Law Society President
    ISSUE 927 · APRIL 2019 PASSING THE TORCH New Zealand’s new Chief Justice and Law Society President The The Harmful Digital A rare honour: Government's Viagogo Communications Queen's lawman: David case Counsel in Parker, Attorney New Zealand General Page 35 Page 42 Page 46 Page 72 You can count on us. M2 protected with area replacement cover: * 8 4 2 9 7 4 0 8,429,740. That’s the square Talk to us about our house, meterage of buildings that MAS contents and car insurance Members have covered by our Area Replacement house insurance today by calling 0800 800 627 option, without having to worry or visit mas.co.nz about getting the cost to rebuild their house wrong. *Count based on recorded policy data as at 30 Sept 2017. Please see the full policy wordings which are available at All they need to do is to tell us how mas.co.nz or by calling 0800 800 627. big the house is and to count on us MAS is a Qualifying Financial Entity (QFE) under the Financial Advisers Act 2008. Our QFE disclosure statement to look after the rest. is available at mas.co.nz or by calling 0800 800 627. Meet your new CDD partner Evaluate. Secure. Guard. For local and global protection, talk to the people that live and breathe trade marks. zone law intellectual property and business law First AML is more than just a third evaluate party service. Understanding your secure zone ip guard business and your customers, we’re the right partner for your Customer FIRST Due Diligence requirements.FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST AML FIRSTAML.CO.NZ AML WGTN +64 4 801 5040 I AKL +64AML 9 352
    [Show full text]
  • Accessing New Zealand's Civil Courts As a Litigant in Person
    University of Otago Faculty of Law Keeping Up Appearances: Accessing New Zealand’s Civil Courts as a Litigant in Person Bridgette Toy-Cronin A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 31 July 2015 Abstract It is commonly believed that more and more people are going to court without a lawyer, both in New Zealand and in other common law jurisdictions. The right to appear in court in person is essential to the legitimacy of the courts. That legitimacy would be harmed if the courts were only accessible to those with the means to pay for legal representation. When litigants take up their right to appear in person, they encounter a system primarily designed for lawyers, however. So they confront a fundamental contradiction: the courts must appear to be accessible to litigants but they cannot grant too much access or they will be choked by the demand. Furthermore, the right of access in person lacks substance in many cases, because the system cannot easily be navigated without a lawyer. Using several qualitative methods including interviews, document review and participant observation, this thesis asks, first, why are litigants going to New Zealand’s civil courts without a lawyer? Second, what is their experience of litigating in person? Third, how do the inhabitants of the court system – the judges, lawyers and court staff – perceive litigants in person and respond to them? The research participants included litigants in person (LiPs) (34), court staff (8), lawyers (16) and judges (13), so that their different perspectives could be considered. The study began with a detailed exploration of the perspectives of LiPs, who participated either in interviews or via a case study.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conference to Mark the Retirement of the Chief Justice
    A CONFERENCE TO MARK THE RETIREMENT OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Thursday 31 January, Friday 1 February 2019 Fisher & Paykel Auditorium, Symonds St, Auckland The Legal Research Foundation, supported by the the Chief Justice’s career. We are holding a Law Foundation, is pleased to invite you to take unique two-day conference featuring a faculty part in a conference to mark the retirement of the of prominent international and national speakers. Chief Justice of New Zealand. It will open with a pōwhiri at Waipapa Marae (University of Auckland) at 4pm on Wednesday, This important event is the principal opportunity 30 January 2019 and will close with a dinner on for the New Zealand legal profession to honour Friday, 1 February 2019 at the Auckland Museum. Featuring a distinguished faculty of national and international speakers including: Justice Professor Stuart Manuel Cepeda Chief Justice Dame Judge Nancy Rosalie Abella Banner Espinosa Sian Elias Gertner Chief Justice Sir Anthony Mason Kate O’Regan Professor Cheryl Professor Jeremy Susan Kiefel Saunders Waldron The conference includes the following main themes: • Common Law Constitutionalism • Topics in Private Law • Law and Power on the Frontier • Where to for Indigenous Rights • The Supervisory Jurisdiction and and Reconciliation? Administrative Justice • Criminal Law • Environmental Justice and • Human Rights Climate Change • Judging For more information and to register: www.legalresearch.org.nz/events | [email protected] | (09) 923 6035 The Legal Research Foundation is grateful for the
    [Show full text]
  • The Law School Farewells Nin Tomas and Others Khylee Quince: National Tertiary Teaching Excellence Award Winner Student Mooting Thrives CONTENTS MKT 14/131
    EdenFACULTY OF LAW ANNUAL 2014 Crescent The Law School Farewells Nin Tomas and Others Khylee Quince: National Tertiary Teaching Excellence Award Winner Student Mooting Thrives CONTENTS MKT 14/131 Eden Crescent From the Dean ..................................................................... 3 VISITORS Clive Walker on Protective Security Against Terrorism . 23 The University of Auckland Faculty of Law FEATURES Bringing the United Nations to Auckland to Enhance Alumni magazine Farewell to Nin Tomas ........................................................ 4 the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Worldwide ................. 24 Khylee Quince: National Tertiary Teaching Professor Barry Cushman on the “Lochner Era” ............ 25 Editor: Julia Tolmie Excellence Award Winner .................................................. 6 Visitors in Brief ...................................................................... 25 Editorial support: Alison Lees, Andrew Stockley Professor John Carter on the Construction of Contracts 26 and Rebecca Baylis FACULTY NEWS “When Freedoms Collide”: Professor Helen Alvare’ ..... 26 Design/Production: The University of Auckland Appointments ........................................................................ 8 Approachable Professor Thrives on the Challenge Cover photo: Khylee Quince Promotions ............................................................................. 8 of Complex Research ........................................................... 27 Photographer: Scott Optican Farewell to Pam Ringwood ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiring National Indigenous Legal Education for Aotearoa New Zealand’S Bachelor of Laws Degree
    Inspiring National Indigenous Legal Education for Aotearoa New Zealand’s Bachelor of Laws Degree Phase One: Strengthening the Ability for Māori Law to Become a Firm Foundational Component of a Legal Education in Aotearoa New Zealand University of Otago LLB students, 2019. Inspiring National Indigenous Legal Education for Aotearoa New Zealand’s Bachelor of Laws Degree Phase One: Strengthening the Ability for Māori Law to Become a Firm Foundational Component of a Legal Education in Aotearoa New Zealand Issues Paper Professor Jacinta Ruru Associate Professor Amokura Kawharu (Raukawa, Ngāti Ranginui) (Ngāti Whatua, Ngāpuhi) Metiria Turei Adrianne Paul (Ngāti Awa, Ngāi Tuhoe) (Ngāti Kahungunu, Ati Hau nui a Pāpārangi) Mylene Rakena (Ngāti Hine/Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Kahungunu) Associate Professor Carwyn Jones (Ngāti Kahungunu, Te Aitanga-a- Māmari Stephens Māhaki) (Te Rarawa) Dr Fleur Te Aho Associate Professor Khylee Quince (Ngāti Mutunga) (Te Roroa/Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Porou) Associate Professor Linda Te Aho (Ngāti Koroki Kahukura, Waikato-Tainui) Associate Professor Claire Charters Dr Valmaine Toki (Ngāti Whakaue, Tūwharetoa, (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Wai, Ngāti Whatua) Ngāpuhi, Tainui) Tracey Whare Associate Professor Andrew Erueti (Raukawa, Te Whānau-ā-Apanui) (Ngā Ruahinerangi, Ngāti Ruanui, Ati Hau nui a Pāpārangi) Rebekah Bright (Rongowhakaata, Ngāti Kahungunu Dr Robert Joseph ki Heretaunga) (Tainui, Tūwharetoa, Kahungunu, Rangitane, Ngāi Tahu) 3 Ngā Mihi | Acknowledgements Tēnei mātou ka tangi mōteatea nei ki a rātou mā kua It is right that we first lament those who have passed wehe atu ki tua o te ārai. Haere, hoki atu koutou ki te beyond the veil. May they rest among the illustrious, poho o te Atua, ki te huihuinga o te kahurangi, okioki ai.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Trailblazers in the Law: the New Zealand Women Judges Oral Histories Project
    407 WOMEN TRAILBLAZERS IN THE LAW: THE NEW ZEALAND WOMEN JUDGES ORAL HISTORIES PROJECT Elizabeth Chan* The New Zealand Women Judges Oral Histories Project aims to provide the first national, publicly accessible records of the lives and careers of trailblazing women judges. As part of this project, this article shares the stories of nine women judges who have broken gender barriers at every stage of their legal studies and careers, including as the first women law graduates, partners of law firms, Queen's Counsel and judges. In sharing the challenges faced by, and celebrating the successes of, these women judges, their individual stories give context to the statistics showing that women's participation at the highest levels of the legal profession remains the exception rather than the norm. It is hoped that the achievements of the women who have gone before will inspire today's young women to reach positions of leadership in the profession, and, more broadly, to strive for equality in both their personal and professional lives. I INTRODUCTION In 2003, Philip Girard wrote that in "Australia, New Zealand and Canada, the writing of judicial biography has been a somewhat halting and sporadic enterprise".1 In the past four years, the New Zealand Women Judges Oral Histories Project (Oral Histories Project) has made a systematic effort to record the life histories of 18 of New Zealand's women trailblazers in the judiciary. Drawing on the oral history interviews completed to date, this article shares the stories of nine women judges * Elizabeth Chan, LLM candidate (Yale Law School), LLB (Hons), BA (University of Auckland).
    [Show full text]
  • Eden Crescent Te Kerehiniti O Itena • Auckland Law School Annual 2015
    Eden Crescent Te Kerehiniti o Itena • Auckland Law School Annual 2015 Appointments Record recruitment round for Auckland Law School Supreme Court 10 year anniversary conference Legal writing New programme launched Eden Crescent The Auckland Law School Alumni Annual. Editor: Susan Watson From the Dean ................................................. 1 RESEARCH Editorial Support: Alison Lees, Andrew Research highlights ......................................... 34 Stockley, Scott Optican, Nicola Hoogenboom FEATURES New books ...................................................... 39 Jo Manning, Ada Marama Biggest appointment round in Auckland Law School’s history ................................................ 2 VISITORS Designer/Production: Studio Ahoy and Faculty hosts major conference on the first ten Michael Kirby ................................................... 43 Corson’s Creative Studio years of the Supreme Court ............................. 10 Professor Jane Ginsburg .................................. 44 Cover Photo: Warren Swain, Chris Noonan, New Legal Research, Writing and Professor Paul Brand ........................................ 44 Anna Hood, Andrew Erueti, An Hertogen and Communication Course for all students .......... 15 Sir Robin Jacob ................................................ 45 Craig Elliffe Top practitioners ............................................. 46 Photographer: Dean Carruthers FACULTY NEWS Visitors news in brief ........................................ 48 New work-friendly postgraduate programmes:
    [Show full text]
  • Article / Review Title
    A point of stability in the life of the nation: The office of Chief Justice of New Zealand — Supreme Court judge, judicial branch leader, and constitutional guardian & statesperson * ** DR RICHARD CORNES , I Introduction What is the scope of the modern office of Chief Justice (CJ) of New Zealand? Clearly, the role extends beyond taking the central seat in the Supreme Court’s Kauri kernel shaped courtroom at 85 Lambton Quay, Wellington, (the home of the Supreme Court of New Zealand).1 Until the commencement of the Supreme Court Act 2003 — which, inter alia, replaced the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London as New Zealand’s final court of appeal with the new Supreme Court — there was a lack of clarity as to who the nation’s top judge was.2 Within New Zealand there was the CJ. Chief Justices for the most part sat in the High Court (the first instance superior court). They were also eligible to sit in the first instance appellate court, the Court of Appeal. That court had its own full time leader: the President. The President presided unless the CJ was sitting. This gave rise to the potential for tension between the CJ and President, a point which is explored further below. In addition to the CJ and President, there was a third candidate. So long as cases could be appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the British judge chairing the Committee could be said to be New Zealand’s top judge, at least for the case before the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Cancer Our Research Revolution
    THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND ALUMNI MAGAZINE AUTUMN 2019 FIGHTING CANCER OUR RESEARCH REVOLUTION Essential entrepreneurs Random acts of kindness Taking Issue University innovators Can we keep Social media in boosting the economy them up? a democracy BIG PICTURE BOLD AS BRASS Second Line brass band, the Auckland City Scoundrels, shared their energetic musicianship on the City Campus during Graduation Week. Photo: Godfrey Boehnke this issue REGULARS 7 27 Fighting cancer: Distinguished Alumni 6 research revolution Award winners Editorial Some of the country’s top cancer research The diverse recipients honoured is taking place at the University of in 2019 answer questions about Auckland, so are we winning the fight? their lives. Guest13 columnist Finlay Macdonald 18 21 28 Taking Issue Dame Helen Winkelmann: Elizabeth Iorns: Chief Justice for all fearless entrepreneur 20 Picking up the legacy of Dame Sian Elias, Former cancer researcher, Elizabeth Iorns, News Dame Helen Winkelmann describes how is now facilitating others’ research through the legal profession needs to change. her successful start-up Science Exchange. Research29 31 24 30 From the archives Simon Talbot: Good deed out on a limb with wine Distinguished Alumnus and reconstructive Raising the Bar features 20 thought leaders, Around32 the globe surgeon, Dr Simon Talbot, talks about his speaking in ten bars around Auckland, work saving life and limb. including wine scientist Rebecca Deed. Alumni34 networks 7 36tips for … boosting creativity 38Books 4 | Ingenio magazine Design:23 Deb Polson Art:37 Finn McCahon-Jones 14 Shape of things to come Olaf Diegel’s additive manufacturing skills reflect the type of innovation New Zealand needs.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Report Aurel Croissant, Raymond Miller, Aurel Croissant (Coordinator)
    New Zealand Report Aurel Croissant, Raymond Miller, Aurel Croissant (Coordinator) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2019 © vege - stock.adobe.com Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2019 | 2 New Zealand Report Executive Summary New Zealand’s democratic system is based on a unicameral parliament, a working rule of law, a strong executive branch and effective government. The system is healthy and stable. Despite an ongoing debate over the adoption of a written constitution, the fundamental structure and operation of governance reflects represents continuity. New Zealand’s unique constitutional arrangements result in a significant concentration of power in a highly cohesive system of cabinet government. The country’s commitment to economic freedom is reflected in its leading position in the World Bank’s 2018 Doing Business report. The review period of the SGI 2019 covers approximately the first year of the new (sixth) Labour government. In September 2017, the National party lost office after nine years in power. Despite success at the 2017 election, it was unable to secure a parliamentary majorty after its former coalition partners, the Māori and United Future parties, failed to win any seats and a third party, ACT New Zealand, retained only one. In late October 2017, Labour and New Zealand First (NZ First) formed a coalition government. A third party, the Greens, agreed to a confidence and supply arrangement, in exchange for some policy concessions and ministerial positions outside of cabinet. As a result, the new coalition government under Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (Labour) was able to command the support of 63 of the 120 seats in parliament.
    [Show full text]