DOCSLIB.ORG

Willamette Biological Opinion, Part 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Consultation Biological Opinion & Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation & Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Consultation on the "Willamette River Basin Flood Control Project" Action Agencies: u.s. Army Corps of Engineers Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Consultation Conducted by: NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Northwest Region NOAA Fisheries Log Number: FINWRl2000/02117 Date Issued: July 11, 2008 Issued by: D. Robert Lohn Regional Administrator NMFS Willamette Project Biological Opinion Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVES 1.2 CONSULTATION PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1.2.1 ESA Consultation on Willamette Project Operations 1.2.2 ESA Consultation on Willamette Project Hatcheries 1.2.3 Merging Hatcheries and Project Operations into a Single Consultation and Development of the 2007 Supplemental BA 1.2.4 Litigation and Settlement 1.3 CONSULTATION WITH AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBES 1.4 LISTED SPECIES OCCURRING WITHIN THE ACTION AREA 1.5 APPLICATION OF ESA SECTION 7(A)(2) STANDARDS – ANALYTICAL APPROACH 1.6 TERM OF THE OPINION 1.7 CONCLUSIONS 2 PROPOSED ACTION 2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSES OF THE WILLAMETTE PROJECT 2.2 WILLAMETTE PROJECT ADMINISTRATION, ROLES OF USACE, BPA, RECLAMATION 2.2.1 US Army Corps of Engineers’ Roles 2.2.2 US Bureau of Reclamation’s Roles 2.2.3 Bonneville Power Administration’s Roles 2.3 PROJECT PURPOSES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 2.3.1 Flood Control 2.3.2 Irrigation Water Supply 2.3.3 Municipal and Industrial Water Supply 2.3.4 Navigation 2.3.5 Flow Augmentation 2.3.6 Hydroelectric Power Generation 2.3.7 Recreation 2.3.8 System Operation 2.3.9 Land Use Management 2.3.10 Bank Protection Program 2.3.11 Emergency Assistance Program 2.3.12 Fish Conservation 2.4 THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 2.5 TERM OF PROPOSED ACTION 2.6 CONTINUING COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT 2.6.1 Federal Agency Manager’s Forum 2.6.2 WATER Steering Committee 2.6.3 WATER Technical Coordinating Committees 2.6.4 Flow Management Committee 2.6.5 Fish Passage and Hatchery Management Committee 2.6.6 Construction Projects Environmental Coordinating Committee 2.6.7 Water Quality/Temperature Control Committee 2.7 PROJECT PLANS 2.7.1 Routine and Non-routine Operations and Maintenance Activities 2.7.2 Willamette Fish Passage and Management Plan 2.8 FLOW MANAGEMENT MEASURES 2.8.1 WATER Flow Management Committee Table of Contents i July 11, 2008 NMFS Willamette Project Biological Opinion 2.8.2 Protocol for Notification of Deviations 2.8.3 Minimum Mainstem Flows 2.8.4 Minimum and Maximum Tributary Flows 2.8.5 Ramping Rates 2.8.6 Foster Dam Spring Spill 2.8.7 Flow-related Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RM&E) 2.9 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION WATER MARKETING PROGRAM 2.10 FISH HATCHERIES AND RELATED PROGRAMS 2.10.1 Spring Chinook Reintroduction/Outplant Program 2.10.2 North Santiam Spring Chinook Hatchery Program 2.10.3 South Santiam Spring Chinook Hatchery Program 2.10.4 McKenzie Spring Chinook Program 2.10.5 Middle Fork Willamette Spring Chinook Hatchery Program 2.10.6 Upper Willamette Summer Steelhead Hatchery Program 2.10.7 Rainbow Trout Mitigation Program 2.10.8 Hatchery Mitigation Program Research, Monitoring and Evaluation 2.11 HABITAT RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT ACTIONS 2.11.1 Onsite Habitat Restoration and Resource Stewardship Actions 2.11.2 Offsite Habitat Restoration Actions 2.11.3 North Santiam Gravel and Large Wood Restoration Study 2.11.4 Willamette River Bank Protection Program 2.11.5 Habitat-Related Research Monitoring and Evaluation 2.12 STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS: FISH PASSAGE, TEMPERATURE CONTROL AND HATCHERIES 2.12.1 Cougar Dam Adult Fish Collection Facility and RME Program 2.12.2 Willamette Valley Fish Handling and Transport Facilities Improvements 2.12.3 Willamette System Review Study 2.12.4 Construction Projects Environmental Coordination and Management 2.12.5 Conceptual Implementation Schedule 2.13 WATER QUALITY ACTIONS 2.13.1 Cougar Dam Temperature Control Project 2.13.2 TMDL Water Quality Management Plan 2.13.3 Water Quality Research Monitoring & Evaluation 2.14 RESEARCH, MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROGRAM 2.14.1 Coordination with the FCRPS RME Plan 2.14.2 Guiding Principles and Strategic Questions for RM&E Needs 2.15 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION AREA 3 RANGEWIDE STATUS 3.1 RANGEWIDE STATUS OF THE SPECIES 3.2 LIFE HISTORIES, FACTORS FOR DECLINE, AND POPULATION TRENDS 3.2.1 Upper Willamette River Chinook Salmon 3.2.2 Upper Willamette River Steelhead 3.2.3 Lower Columbia River Salmon and Steelhead Species 3.2.4 Interior Columbia River ESU/DPSs 3.3 CRITICAL HABITAT FOR COLUMBIA AND WILLAMETTE BASIN SALMONIDS 3.3.1 Critical Habitat for Upper Willamette River Chinook Salmon 3.3.2 Critical Habitat for Upper Willamette River Steelhead 3.3.3 Critical Habitat for Other ESU/DPSs Table of Contents ii July 11, 2008 NMFS Willamette Project Biological Opinion 4 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE 4.1 GENERAL BASELINE PERSPECTIVE 4.1.1 Project Effects in the Environmental Baseline 4.1.2 Large-scale Environmental Variation 4.1.3 Water Diversions 4.2 MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE 4.2.1 Historical Populations of Anadromous Salmonids in the Middle Fork Subbasin 4.2.2 Current Status of Anadromous Salmonids within the Middle Fork Willamette Subbasin 4.2.3 Environmental Conditions 4.2.4 Hatchery Programs 4.2.5 Fisheries 4.2.6 Status of PCEs of Designated Critical Habitat in the Middle Fork Willamette Subbasin 4.3 MCKENZIE SUBBASIN 4.3.1 Historical Populations of Anadromous Salmonids in the McKenzie Subbasin 4.3.2 Current Status of ESA-Listed Anadromous Salmonids within the Subbasin 4.3.3 Environmental Conditions 4.3.4 Hatchery Programs 4.3.5 Fisheries 4.3.6 Status of PCEs of Designated Critical Habitat in the McKenzie Subbasin 4.4 CALAPOOIA 4.4.1 Historical Populations of Anadromous Salmonids in the Calapooia Subbasin 4.4.2 Current Status of Anadromous Salmonids within the Calapooia Subbasin 4.4.3 Structures Impeding Fish Passage 4.4.4 Hatchery Program 4.4.5 Fisheries 4.4.6 Status of PCEs of Designated Critical Habitat and Factors Affecting those PCEs in the Calapooia River Subbasin 4.5 SOUTH SANTIAM SUBBASIN 4.5.1 Historical Populations of Anadromous Fish in the South Santiam Subbasin 4.5.2 Current Status of ESA-Listed Salmon and Steelhead within the Subbasin 4.5.3 Environmental Conditions 4.5.4 Hatchery Programs 4.5.5 Fisheries 4.5.6 Status of PCEs of Designated Critical Habitat in the South Santiam Subbasin 4.6 NORTH SANTIAM SUBBASIN 4.6.1 Historical Populations of Anadromous Salmonids in the Subbasin 4.6.2 Current Status of Native Anadromous Salmonids within the Subbasin 4.6.3 Environmental Conditions 4.6.4 Hatchery Programs 4.6.5 Fisheries 4.6.6 Status of PCEs of Designated Critical Habitat and Factors Affecting those PCEs in the North Santiam Subbasin 4.7 MOLALLA BASELINE 4.7.1 Historical Populations of Anadromous Salmonids 4.7.2 Current Status 4.7.3 Environmental Conditions 4.7.4 Hatchery Programs 4.7.5 Fisheries 4.7.6 Habitat Alteration 4.8 CLACKAMAS SUBBASIN 4.8.1 Historical Populations of Anadromous Salmonids in the Clackamas Subbasin Table of Contents iii July 11, 2008 NMFS Willamette Project Biological Opinion 4.8.2 Current status of ESA-Listed Salmon and Steelhead in the Subbasin 4.8.3 Environmental Conditions 4.8.4 Hatchery Programs 4.8.5 Harvest 4.8.6 Status of PCEs of Designated Critical Habitat in the Clackamas Subbasin 4.9 COAST FORK AND LONG TOM SUBBASINS 4.9.1 Historical Status of Anadromous Salmonids in the Coast Fork Willamette and Long Tom Subbasins 4.9.2 Current Status of Anadromous Salmonids in the Coast Fork and Long Tom Subbasins 4.9.3 Environmental Conditions 4.9.4 Hatchery Programs 4.9.5 Fisheries 4.9.6 Status of Habitat in the Coast Fork Willamette and Long Tom Subbasins 4.10 MAINSTEM WILLAMETTE 4.10.1 Historical Populations of Anadromous Salmonids in the Mainstem 4.10.2 Current Status of Native Anadromous Salmonids in the Mainstem 4.10.3 Environmental Conditions 4.10.4 Hatchery Programs 4.10.5 Fisheries 4.10.6 Status of PCEs of Designated Critical Habitat and Factors Affecting PCEs along the Mainstem Willamette 4.11 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER, ESTUARY, PLUME, AND COASTAL OCEAN 4.11.1 Status of Habitat in the Lower Columbia River, Estuary, and Coastal Ocean 4.11.2 Hatchery Effects 4.11.3 Fisheries 4.11.4 Status of Designated Critical Habitat in the Lower Columbia River and Estuary 5 EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 5.1 EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION COMMON TO MULTIPLE AREAS 5.1.1 WATER Committee Process and Structure 5.1.2 Willamette System Review Study 5.1.3 RME Studies 5.1.4 Revetments 5.1.5 General Effects of Hatchery Programs on ESA-listed Salmon and Steelhead 5.1.6 Water Marketing 5.1.7 Climate Change Considerations 5.2 MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE RIVER SUBBASIN 5.2.1 Habitat Access and Fish Passage 5.2.2 Water Quantity/Hydrograph 5.2.3 Water Quality 5.2.4 Physical Habitat Quality 5.2.5 Hatcheries 5.2.6 Summary of Effects on the Middle Fork Willamette Chinook Salmon Population 5.2.7 Effects of the Proposed Action on Designated Critical Habitat 5.3 MCKENZIE RIVER SUBBASIN 5.3.1 Habitat Access and Fish Passage 5.3.2 Water Quantity/Hydrograph 5.3.3 Water Quality 5.3.4 Physical Habitat Quality 5.3.5 Hatcheries 5.3.6 Summary of Effects on the McKenzie Chinook Salmon Population Table of Contents iv July 11, 2008 NMFS Willamette Project Biological Opinion 5.3.7 Effects of the Proposed Action on Designated Critical Habitat 5.4 CALAPOOIA SUBBASIN 5.4.1 Habitat Access and Fish Passage 5.4.2 Water Quantity/Hydrograph 5.4.3 Water Quality 5.4.4 Physical Habitat
Recommended publications
  • Endangered Species Act Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens

    Endangered Species Act Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NA TIO NAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard. SUite 1100 PORT LAND, OREGON 97232·1274 January 11 , 2013 Lorri Lee Pacific Northwest Regional Director U .S. Bureau ofReclamation 1160 North Curtis Road, Suite 100 Boise, Idaho 83706-1234 Re: Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Odessa Subarea Modified Partial Groundwater Replacement Project. (NWR-2012-9371) Dear Ms. Lee: Enclosed is the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Consultation prepared by National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) regarding the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's (Reclamation) Odessa Subarea Modified Partial Groundwater Replacement Project on the Colwnbia River in Adams, Lincoln, Franklin and Grant Counties, Washington. NMFS received a final biological assessment (BA) from Reclamation on November 6, 2012. Reclamation's BA determined that Columbia River chum salmon were likely to be adversely affected by the proposed action, 12 other species ofESA listed salmon and steelhead would not likely be adversely affected by the proposed action, and that Pacific eulachon, green sturgeon, and southern resident killer whales would not likely be adversely affected by the proposed action. NMFS disagreed with Reclamation's "Not Likely
  • South Santiam Hatchery

    South Santiam Hatchery

    SOUTH SANTIAM HATCHERY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 South Santiam Hatchery/Foster Adult Collection Facility INTRODUCTION South Santiam Hatchery is located on the South Santiam River just downstream from Foster Dam, 5 miles east of downtown Sweet Home. The facility is at an elevation of 500 feet above sea level, at latitude 44.4158 and longitude -122.6725. The site area is 12.6 acres, owned by the US Army Corps of Engineers and is used for egg incubation and juvenile rearing. The hatchery currently receives water from Foster Reservoir. A total of 8,400 gpm is available for the rearing units. An additional 5,500 gpm is used in the large rearing pond. All rearing ponds receive single-pass water. ODFW has no water right for water from Foster Reservoir, although it does state in the Cooperative agreement between the USACE and ODFW that the USACE will provide adequate water to operate the facility. The Foster Dam Adult Collection Facility was completed in July of 2014 which eliminated the need to transport adults to and hold brood stock at South Santiam Hatchery. ODFW took over operations of the facility in April of 2014. The new facility consists of an office/maintenance building, pre-sort pool, fish sorting area, 5 long term post-sort pools, 4 short term post-sort pools, and a water-to-water fish-to-truck loading system. Adult fish collection, adult handling, out planting, recycling, spawning, carcass processing, and brood stock holding will take place at Foster The Foster Dam Adult Collection Facility is located about 2 miles east of Sweet Home, Oregon at the base of Foster Dam along the south shore of the South Santiam River at RM 37.
  • Family -Friendly Spots to Live, Play And

    Family -Friendly Spots to Live, Play And

    Vote for your favorites! PDX Parent Picks 2021 for the long days and short years theCity Guide FamiFamilyly- friendly spotspotss to live, play and eat PDXPARENT.COM PORTLAND | VANCOUVERpdxparent.com | JANUARY | January 2021 1 pdxparent.com | January 2021 3 4 January 2021 | pdxparent.com contents ERIN J. BERNARD BONCHRON DENISE CASTAÑON NATALIE GILDERSLEEVE PORTLAND PARKS AND RECREATION PDX Parent’s City Guide Take a deep dive into family-friendly neighborhoods across the quadrants and beyond. Find family-tested places to eat and play; housing costs; transit, walk and bike scores; and much more. North: BONUS STORIES RESOURCES St. Johns neighborhood ..........................................................8 Editor’s Note ..........................................................................6 City Guide Listings Northeast: A helpful directory to find Friendly Neighborhoods King neighborhood .......................................................................12 for LGBTQ+ Families ....................................................9 everything your family needs — from dentists to dance Southeast: Supporting Local Black-owned .......................................................................10 Sellwood-Moreland neighborhood ............................16 classes. Businesses .............................................................................13 School Open Houses ............................... 31 Southwest: GreatSchools.org: .................................................20 Maplewood neighborhood Ratings Aren’t the
  • Appendix E: the City's Natural Environment

    Appendix E: the City's Natural Environment

    APPENDIX E The City’s Natural Environment APPENDIX E The City’s Natural Environment The City’s Environmental Setting General Characteristics Portland is situated at 20 feet above sea level, near the confluence of the Columbia and Willamette rivers, about 65 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. It lies midway between the lower Coast Range to the west and the high Cascades Range to the east, each about 30 miles distant. Portland’s varied topography includes steep hills, isolated volcanic cones, low rolling hills and extensive flat areas. The area is composed primarily of alluvial deposits and Columbia River basalts. Much of the city is located in the Willamette Valley Plains ecoregion, although steeper portions of the Tualatin Hills on the west side are characteristic of Willamette Valley Hills and Coastal Mountains ecoregions (Clarke and others 1991). Portland has a mild marine climate that is heavily influenced by the mountain ranges east and west of the city. The Coast Range protects the Portland area from Pacific storms, while the Cascades prevent colder continental air masses from invading western Oregon. In winter, the average temperature is 40°F and the average minimum temperature is 34°F. In summer the average temperature is 65°F with an average daily maximum of 74 to 78°F (Rockey 2002). The Cascades also lift moisture-laden westerly winds from the Pacific, driving local rainfall patterns. Average annual rainfall in the Portland area is approximately 37 inches. Nearly 90 percent of the annual rainfall occurs from October through May. Only 9 percent of the annual rainfall occurs between June and September, with 3 percent in July and August.
  • Foster Dam Adult Fish Facility and in Foster Dam Reservoir on the South Santiam River, 2017

    Foster Dam Adult Fish Facility and in Foster Dam Reservoir on the South Santiam River, 2017

    Technical Report 2018-3-FINAL _______________________________________________________________ EVALUATION OF ADULT CHINOOK SALMON BEHAVIOR AT THE FOSTER DAM ADULT FISH FACILITY AND IN FOSTER DAM RESERVOIR ON THE SOUTH SANTIAM RIVER, 2017 M.L. Keefer, T.S. Clabough, M.A. Jepson, T. Blubaugh, G. Brink, G.P. Naughton, C.T. Boggs, and C.C. Caudill Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1136 For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District 2018 1 i Technical Report 2018-3-FINAL _______________________________________________________________ EVALUATION OF ADULT CHINOOK SALMON BEHAVIOR AT THE FOSTER DAM ADULT FISH FACILITY AND IN FOSTER DAM RESERVOIR ON THE SOUTH SANTIAM RIVER, 2017 M.L. Keefer, T.S. Clabough, M.A. Jepson, T. Blubaugh, G. Brink, G.P. Naughton, C.T. Boggs, and C.C. Caudill Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1136 For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District 2018 ii Acknowledgements This research project was funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and we thank Fenton Khan, Rich Piakowski, Glenn Rhett, Deberay Charmichael, Sherry Whittaker, and Steve Schlenker for their support. We also thank Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife staff Bob Mapes, Brett Boyd, and Cameron Sharpe for project coordination and support. We are grateful to the University of Idaho’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee for reviewing and approving the protocols used in this study. We thank Stephanie Burchfield and Diana Dishman (NOAA Fisheries) and Michele Weaver and Holly Huchko (ODFW) for their assistance securing study permits and Bonnie Johnson (U.S.
  • Park Tree Inventory Findings

    Park Tree Inventory Findings

    Tree Summit 2019 PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena Long PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena Long Agenda 9:00am – 9:10am Welcome Jeff Ramsey, Science and Policy Specialist, PP&R Urban Forestry 9:15 am – 10:00 am Results from Portland’s First Inventory of Neighborhood Park Trees Bryn Davis and Bianca Dolan, PP&R Urban Forestry 10:05 am – 10:20 am Canaries in the Coal Mine: Studying urban trees reveals climate impacts on native forests Aaron Ramirez, Professor of Biology, Reed College 10:25 am – 10:40 am Thuja plicata, Hakuna Matata? The Mystery of Western Redcedar Decline in the Pacific Northwest Christine Buhl, Forest Entomologist, Oregon Department of Forestry 10:45 am – 11:00 am Break 11:00 am – 11:15 am Art and Activism in the Urban Forest: The Tree Emergency Response Team Ashley Meyer, Elisabeth Art Center 11:15 am – 11:30 am Film Screening: 82nd and Verdant Filmmaker James Krzmarzick and Dave Hedberg of the Canopy Stories Film Project 11:35 am – 11:45 am Bill Naito Community Trees Award Ceremony Jenn Cairo, City Forester, PP&R Urban Forestry 11:50 am – Noon Growing Portland’s Future Forest Together Angie DiSalvo, Science and Outreach Supervisor, PP&R Urban Forestry Noon – 1:00pm LunchPORTLANDPARKS.ORG and Breakout | Commissioner Session Nick Fish | Director Adena Long Hamilton Park PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena Long PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena Long Alberta Park PORTLANDPARKS.ORG | Commissioner Nick Fish | Director Adena
  • Reserve a Park for Your Picnic

    Reserve a Park for Your Picnic

    Reserve a Park for Your Picnic Making reservations, policies, insurance, and more Prices and policies within are valid for permits booked from February 18 - June 30, 2020. GENERAL INFORMATION Picnic permits allow you to bring in the following items Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) has 200+ parks and for your event - gardens, and many of these locations have individual • 1-2 tables and/or 1-2 pop-up canopies (no larger picnic tables available for use on a first-come, first-served than 10’x10’, no stakes are allowed in a park) basis. When there is a grouping of three or more tables, • a residential-style barbecue grill they are often reservable. To guarantee your picnic • small speakers heard only within immediate date and location, it is recommended that you make a picnic area picnic reservation in advance. For your convenience, this Special Use Permits are required when - brochure lists picnic sites and fees. Parks not included in • there is BYOB beer and wine present and more than 49 this brochure may be reserved under a Special Use Permit. people of any age • you’d like to provide alcohol (hosted, catered, kegs, etc.) Picnic permits cover the following type of events - • you’d like to bring items not included above (i.e. • A gathering of family/friends or company/ volleyball nets, inflatables/bounce house, additional organization tables or canopies) • A single reserved picnic facility without exceeding • you’d like to drive a vehicle on the sidewalk to pick up or the stated site capacity drop off items for your event • When event attendance is free.
  • Draft North Portland District Profile

    Draft North Portland District Profile

    DRAFT NORTH DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Table of Contents Introduction Area Description ……………………………………………………………………. Page 1 Demographics Data ……………………………………………………………. Page 2 Neighborhood Services ………………..………………………………………..… Page 4 Land Use ……………………………………………………………………. Page 13 Environment ……………………………………………………………………. Page 20 Development Activity ……………………………………………………………. Page 24 Economic Development ……………………………………………………………. Page 27 Transportation ……………………………………………………………………. Page 32 Existing Plans and Policies ……………………………………………………. Page 35 DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback from the community is always welcome. DRAFT Area Description Boundaries The North District includes the peninsula formed by the confluence of the Willamette and Columbia Rivers as well as the west side of the Portland Harbor. The eastern district boundary follows the boundaries of the Overlook, Piedmont, East Columbia and Bridgeton neighborhoods.
  • Recommended Draft NOVEMBER 2009

    Recommended Draft NOVEMBER 2009

    Recommended Draft NOVEMBER 2009 b i a R i v e r C o l u m Keellley Point Park B y b s & e d e n l u m b W a C o i h e t l a t S i l o m u S e g h d Rivergate W Chimnimimnmney Park Pier Park i l University of l Portland a m e t t e St Johnshhnnss BNSF R Railroad i Briddge 5.1 v Cathedral l e Park e r n St Johnns n Avenue a Briddge FronttA A h t C Harborton S Helens Road - US Sauvie Island Hwy 30 Brididge y 30 Lininnton Doane Wilbridge St Helens Roadd- - US Hw Lake Volume 3a: Natural Resources Inventory: Riparian Corridors and Wildlife Habitat Willamette River Natural Resource Inventory: Riparian Corridors and Wildlife Habitat Willamette River Natural Resource Inventory Report: Riparian Corridors and Wildlife Habitat Acknowledgements Contributors City Council Adolfson Associates, Inc. Sam Adams, Mayor and Commissioner in Charge Nick Fish Bureau of Development Services Amanda Fritz Kate Green Randy Leonard Kathy Harnden Dan Saltzman Kim Miller Erik Sten (until April 2008) Bureau of Environmental Services Planning Commission Lynn Barlow Don Hanson, President Andi Gresch Amy Cortese Vice President Paul Ketcham Michelle Rudd, Vice President Katelin Lovell André Baugh Chris Prescott Lai-Lani Ovalles Josh Robben Howard Shapiro Ry Thompson Jill Sherman Naomi Tsurumi Irma Valdez Bureau of Planning Bureau of Planning Shannon Buono Susan Anderson, Director Gil Kelley, Director (through December 2008) Sallie Edmunds Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner Diane Hale Brian Campbell, Interim Principal Planner Matt Lustig Arianne Sperry Bureau of Planning Project
  • Lower Willamette River Environmental Dredging and Ecosystem Restoration Project

    Lower Willamette River Environmental Dredging and Ecosystem Restoration Project

    LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRAFT FINAL REPORT March 2015 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. 1020 SW Taylor St. Suite 530 Portland, OR 97205 This page left blank intentionally EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment (FS-EA) evaluates ecosystem restoration actions in the Lower Willamette River, led by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the non-Federal sponsor, the City of Portland (City). The study area encompasses the Lower Willamette River Watershed and its tributaries, from its confluence with the Columbia River at River Mile (RM) 0 to Willamette Falls, located at RM 26. The goal of this study is to identify a cost effective ecosystem restoration plan that maximizes habitat benefits while minimizing impacts to environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic resources. This report contains a summary of the feasibility study from plan formulation through selection of a recommended plan, 35% designs and cost estimating, a description of the baseline conditions, and description of impacts that may result from implementation of the recommended plan. This integrated report complies with NEPA requirements. Sections 1500.1(c) and 1508.9(a) (1) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (as amended) require federal agencies to “provide sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether to prepare an environmental impact statement or a finding of no significant impact” on actions authorized, funded, or carried out by the federal government to insure such actions adequately address “environmental consequences, and take actions that protect, restore, and enhance the environment." The Willamette River watershed was once an extensive and interconnected system of active channels, open slack waters, emergent wetlands, riparian forests, and adjacent upland forests.
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010

    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010

    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
  • Willamette Valley Projects Configuration/Operation Plan (COP)

    Willamette Valley Projects Configuration/Operation Plan (COP)

    Phase II Report Willamette Valley Projects Configuration/Operation Plan (COP) October 2015 Final Report Willamette Valley Projects Configuration/Operation Plan, Phase II Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Configuration/Operation Plan (COP), Phase II Report, for the Willamette Valley system provides recommendations to address the Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) contained in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries or NMFS) 2008 Biological Opinion (BiOp) for the Willamette System (WS) operated and maintained by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE or Corps). The RPA listed actions to be implemented to avoid jeopardy to Upper Willamette River (UWR) spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and UWR winter steelhead (O. mykiss) from continued operations and maintenance of the WS. This COP Phase II report was guided by the development of alternatives documented in the 2009 COP Phase I Report. Although this document does not meet the EC 11-2-208 (dated 31 Mar 2015) definition as a “Decision Document”, it is being used to document the long-term plan for implementing the 2008 Willamette Biological Opinion. BACKGROUND The WS system consists of 13 multipurpose dams and reservoirs, and approximately 92 miles of riverbank protection projects in the Willamette River Basin in Oregon. Each project contributes to the overall water resources management in the basin which is designed to provide flood risk management, hydropower generation, irrigation, navigation, recreation, fish and wildlife, and improved water quality on the Willamette River and many of its tributaries. The fish species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) affected by operation of the WS1 include UWR spring Chinook salmon, UWR winter steelhead, and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus, threatened).