Shakespeare's/«//«5 Caesar, a Dramatization of Plutarch's Account

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shakespeare's/«//«5 Caesar, a Dramatization of Plutarch's Account AGAIN, POETS AND JUUUS CAESAR Margaret Maurer, Colgate University hakespeare's/«//«5 Caesar, a dramatization of Plutarch's account of the death of Julius Caesar and the consequences ofthat event in the war waged against Shis assassins by Mark Antony and Octavian, is particularly admired for the elegance of its plot. The main episodes in the history as Plutarch's Lives con- veys them are contained in a structure that, by line count, is shorter than any of Shakespeare's English histories and all but two of his tragedies.' In relation to his apparent commitment to economy in Julius Caesar, Shakespeare's inclusion in his play of two episodes involving characters identified as poets invites comment and has drawn it concertedly in three essays: Norman Holland, "The 'Cinna' and 'Cynicke' Episodes in Julius Caesar" (I960); Thomas Pughe, "'What should the wars do with these jigging fools?' The Poets \n Julius Caesar" (1988); and Gary Taylor's "Bardicide" (1992).^ A curious feature of the attention paid these scenes by all three of these essays is that none of them considers all of what is known about Cinna, the poet identified by name in Shakespeare's play. Being specific about this, however, particularly about what was known by Shakespeare of Cinna's poetry (and little more is known today than what Shakespeare knew), heightens the already remarkable effect of Shake- speare including these scenes. In this light, incidental as they remain to the historical and political questions surrounding the play's action, the poet scenes make Julius Caesar eerily predictive of the dilemmas faced by teachers of the humanities these days. Because of them, Shakespeare's/«/¿MÍ Caesar stcras to be considering the value of poetry in a time of cataclysmic change; and it is a consideration that, typical of Shakespeare, is unflinching in its unwillingness to mount an expedient defense. Holland and Pughe avoid the questions attendant on Cinna's poetry by as- suming his name is no more than a counter for the figure of a poet. In accord with the critical assumptions implicit in close reading, they justify both 3.3 (the scene depicting the death of Cinna) and lines 123-36 of 4.3 (in which an un- named camp poet intrudes on the quarrel of Brutus and Cassius) by emphasizing thematic connections to what they define, differently, as the prevailing concerns of the play. Holland sees 3.3 and 4.3.124-38 as "play[ing] into one of the chief complexes of imagery" in the play (sleep) and underscoring an important theme in the play, "the separation between Brutus the idealist and Cassius the realist."^ Pughe sees the "poets, together with some of the other minor figures [in the play, as] establish [ing] a metalevel of criticism on which the discourse of reason can be seen to deconstruct itself."'* Holland, Pughe, and Taylor all notice that it is Shakespeare who makes the person who Plutarch says reconciled Brutus and Cassius in the camp scene of 4.3 into an unnamed poet, transforming him from Plutarch's "one Marcus Phaonius, that had bene a friend and follower of Cato...and [who] tooke upon him to counterfeate a Philosopher."' But only Taylor, approaching the play from a more The Upstart Crow historicist perspective, acknowledges that the Cinna of 3.3 is an actual, if shad- owy, figure in literary history. Noting that the poet Cinna's existence is a historical fact but that his poetry has all but vanished, Taylor argues that what Shakespeare does with the two episodes in Plutarch makes Julius Caesar "Shakespeare's Defence of Poetryr^ He suggests, in effect, that m Julius Caesar Shakespeare is defending poetry as Sir Philip Sidney does in a treatise published under that name, The Defence of Poesie.^ In so doing, Taylor says, Shakespeare means to distinguish genuine poetry, that is, his own, from that of writers whose topical satires and epigrams were ordered to be publicly burnt in 1599, the probable date of Julius Caesar s composition and performance. Taylor pays close attention to the changes Shakespeare makes as he adapts the episodes from Plutarch's life of Brutus, observing (somewhat tendentiously, since the detail that "poore Cinna the Poet" is "torne ... in peeces"* comes from Plu- tarch) that Shakespeare's representation of Cinna's murder is modeled on the death of Orpheus: the only wholly admirable poet would have to be a murdered poet, none of whose poems survive—that is a poet like Shakespeare's Cinna. Because ev- ery action involves political and moral choice, the perfect poet must be pas- sive, must be a victim, must be murdered. And because any surviving poem would be subject to criticism, the perfect poet's work could only be beyond criticism if it were beyond content: absent, ravaged, and murdered.' For Taylor, the implication of Shakespeare emphasizing that it is the plebeians who silence the poet is that Shakespeare distances himself from writers who, in his own day, were the object, not of public outrage, but of the government's censure: "The poet Shakespeare constructs a scenario in which the [genuine] poet is unmistakably innocent; the poet's work, unmistakably apolitical; the poet's intentions, unmistak- ably clear; the popular reading of the poet, unmistakably mistaken."'" So, Taylor argues, Shakespeare uses the episode to exonerate the real agents of censorship; and his Cinna, the martyred poet, a true poet, is nothing at all like the writers whose satires were being prohibited and destroyed. The element of Taylor's argument that requires reconsideration, however, is the inference he draws about Shakespeare's interest in Cinna from the fact that none of his poems survive. Though it is true that only a few words of Cinna's poetry are known, Shakespeare and probably many in his audience knew perfectly well what his poem Smyrna was about from Ovid's retelling of its story in Metamorphoses 10. Acknowledging Ovid's connection to Cinna's poem has important implications for interpreting the changes Shakespeare makes in the Cinna episode and, by extension, his inclusion ofa figure called a poet in the quarrel scene of 4.3. It is as 'Ú Julius Caesar, in the text of it that comes down to us, catches Shake- speare reading Plutarch's account of Julius Caesar's assassination and its consequenc- es in the civil war that followed and puzzling over the relationship between this cataclysmic event and the magnificent poetry he associated with this time and its Again, Poets and Julius Caesar 7 immediate aftermath—^with the poetry of Vergil, Horace, and Ovid, all of whom wrote their greatest works under the regime of the man who triumphed at Philippi, and one of whom, Ovid, was ultimately banished from Rome, according to the literary history Shakespeare knew, by that man for, in the poet's own account in Tristia II, "duo crimina, carmen et error" two crimes, a poem and a mistake." That is, in its representation of one of the most significant moments in Roman history, Shakespeare's Julius Caesar obliquely considers a question as old as Plato and as much alive to Shakespeare and his contemporaries as it is to humanist educators today: what good is poetry? or, if some poetry's goodness be granted, what kind of poetry is good? In his play Poetaster (ca. 1601), Shakespeare's younger contemporary Ben Jonson imagines the mature Octavian, Augustus Caesar, in conversation with poets, with Ver- gil, Horace, Ovid, Tibullus, and Gallus. Augustus addresses the question of poetry's value to society by asserting that poems have value, but it is for their capacity to con- vey wisdom, promote virtue, and condemn vice. Vergil, the epic poet, and Horace, a satiric one, receive Augustus's particular commendation. The play also, however, con- demns a certain kind of poet and poetry. Augustus exiles "Licentious Naso . From all approach to our imperial court / On pain of death" (4.6.52, 55-56). Augustus's taste in poetry in Jonson's play accords with the overt argument mounted by Sir Philip Sidney in his Defence.^^ In that treatise, which Shakespeare might well have known before it was printed in 1595 but which he had almost certainly read by the time he wrote Julius Caesar, Shakespeare would have found the argument that genuine poetry, which Sidney defines as "an art of imitation ... a speaking picture, with this end, to teach and delight,"'^ can be favorably compared to history and philosophy because it more effectively than any other form of writing can promote virtue, both in the general sense of men's manners or behavior and in the particular sense to which Sidney repeatedly reverts, valorous action in war: The philosopher, therefore, and the historian are they which would win the goal [of being the supreme knowledge], the one by precept, the other by example. But both, not having both, do both halt. Now doth the peer- less poet perform both. ...''* Poetry, Sidney asserts, not history and not philosophy, is "the companion of camps,"'^ the form of writing that men take to war with them to inspire them to heroism. The point is explicitly raised in the Defence and underscored by example: This Alexander [the Creat of Macedón] left his schoolmaster, living Aristo- tle, behind him, but took dead Homer with him. He put the philosopher Callisthenes to death for his seeming philosophical, indeed mutinous, stub- bornness; but the chief thing he ever was heard to wish for was that Homer had been alive.'^ 8 The Upstart Crow In the two poet scenes in Julius Caesar, especially when considered against the form in which Shakespeare found them in Plutarch, Shakespeare seems to be calling into question if not mocking outright Sidney's argument.
Recommended publications
  • Hints from Horace
    HINTS FROM HORACE INTRODUCTION BYRON AND HORACE: “the great little poet’s wrong”1 Byron refers to Horace more often than he does any other poet except Shakespeare. There is at once characteristic aptness and characteristic irony in this, for Horace was a kind of Roman Southey – with genius. Where Byron is far from scared about giving political offence to the establishment, Horace never even thinks of doing so – one of his longest verse-letters,2 and several of his Odes, are addressed in terms of respect, nay reverence, to the Emperor Augustus, and his Carmen Seculare (a title appropriated by Byron for The Age of Bronze, a poem the reverse of Caesarist) was commissioned by the Emperor himself. Horace is committed to the political status quo of his time and place. Byron would never write the English equivalent of Caelo tonantem credidimus Iovem Regnare; praesens divus habebitur Augustus adiectis Britannis Imperio gravibusque Persis.3 [We believe that Jove is king in heaven because we hear his thunders peal; Augustus shall be deemed a god on earth for adding to our empire the Britons and dread Parthians.] or, … ego nec tumultum nec mori per vim metuam tenente Caesare terras.4 [Neither civil strife nor death by violence will I fear, while Caesar holds the earth.] 1: Don Juan XIV, 77, 2. 2: Hor. Epis. II, i. 3: Hor. Od. III, v, 1-4. 4: Hor. Od. III, xiv , 14-16. Many more examples could be adduced, of Horace’s intense patriotism and Caesarism,5 a Caesarism all the more intense for being, like Southey’s conservatism, that of a turncoat, a renegado: for Horace had fought at Philippi on the side of Brutus and Cassius.
    [Show full text]
  • Catullus, Caesar, and the Foundations of Roman Ideology
    Catullus, Caesar, and the Foundations of Roman Ideology I argue in this paper that Catullus’ attacks on Caesar in Poems 57 and 11 serve to link sexuality and empire by associating Caesar and Mamurra with both extravagant imperialist aggression and pathic receptivity (Konstan, 2000). Catullus implicitly critiques the decadence and corruption in Roman society and, at the same time, endorses the ethic of masculine aggression, epitomized by Caesar, Mamurra, and the Catullan lover himself. Indeed, Catullus attributes to Caesar and Mamurra the very qualities of wantonness and passivity associated throughout the Catullan corpus with the male narrator (Greene, 1995; Skinner, 1993). In assigning to Caesar some of the traits he reviles in himself, the speaker suggests not only a continuity between the spheres of the political and the erotic but also implies that his own subject position in relation to those spheres cannot be distinctly located. Catullus also suggests, I would argue, that Roman masculinity is a fundamentally unstable concept (Janan, 2001; Wray 2002). This is evident in the fact that the putatively weak male lover in Catullus typically asserts his own masculinity by threatening to feminize other men (Williams 1999). Poem 16 (pedicabo et irrumabo) is a notorious example of this. In fact, one of the central assumptions of the ideology of Roman masculinity is that a man’s status as vir is enhanced by his penetration of other males. By predicating the center of power in the Roman world on both domination and subordination, Catullus suggests that the perversion of traditional masculine and feminine roles may constitute a crucial dimension of Roman imperialist ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • BY PLATO• ARISTOTLE • .AND AQUINAS I
    i / REF1,l!;CTit.>NS ON ECONOMIC PROBLEMS / BY PLATO• ARISTOTLE • .AND AQUINAS ii ~FLECTIONS ON ECONO:MIC PROBLEMS 1 BY PLA'I'O, ARISTOTLE, JJJD AQUINAS, By EUGENE LAIDIBEL ,,SWEARINGEN Bachelor of Science Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Collage Stillwater, Oklahoma 1941 Submitted to the Depertmeut of Economics Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 1948 iii f.. 'I. I ···· i·: ,\ H.: :. :· ··: ! • • ~ ' , ~ • • !·:.· : i_ ·, 1r 1i1. cr~~rJ3t L l: i{ ,\ I~ Y , '•T •)() 1 0 ,1 8 API-'HOV~D BY: .J ,.· 1.., J l.;"t .. ---- -··- - ·- ______.,.. I 7 -.. JI J ~ L / \ l v·~~ u ' ~) (;_,LA { 7 {- ' r ~ (\.7 __\ _. ...A'_ ..;f_ ../-_" ...._!)_.... ..." ___ ......._ ·;...;;; ··-----/ 1--.,i-----' ~-.._.._ :_..(__,,---- ....... Member of the Report Committee 1..j lj:,;7 (\ - . "'·- -· _ .,. ·--'--C. r, .~-}, .~- Q_ · -~ Q.- 1Head of the Department . · ~ Dean of the Graduate School 502 04 0 .~ -,. iv . r l Preface The purpose and plan of this report are set out in the Introduction. Here, I only wish to express my gratitude to Professor Russell H. Baugh who has helped me greatly in the preparation of this report by discussing the various subjects as they were in the process of being prepared. I am very much indebted to Dr. Harold D. Hantz for his commentaries on the report and for the inspiration which his classes in Philosophy have furnished me as I attempted to correlate some of the material found in these two fields, Ecor!.Omics and Philosophy. I should like also to acknowledge that I owe my first introduction into the relationships of Economics and Philosophy to Dean Raymond Thomas, and his com~ents on this report have been of great value.
    [Show full text]
  • Cas Cl 230: the Golden Age of Latin Literature
    CAS CL 230: THE GOLDEN AGE OF LATIN LITERATURE In Workflow 1. CASCL Chair ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2. CAS Dean ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; jessmroh; lcherch; [email protected]; [email protected]) 3. GEC SubCommittees ([email protected]) 4. University Gen Ed Committee Chair ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]) 5. Final Approval ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]) Approval Path 1. Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:00:40 GMT MEGHAN ELIZABETH KELLY (mekel): Approved for CASCL Chair New Proposal Date Submitted: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:21:14 GMT Viewing: The Golden Age of Latin Literature Last edit: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:21:14 GMT Changes proposed by: mekel Section One – Provenance of Proposal Proposer Information Name Title Email School/College Department Name Leah Kronenberg Assoc. Prof. [email protected] CAS Classical Studies Section Two – Course or Co-Curricular Activity Identifiers What are you proposing? Course College College of Arts & Sciences Department CLASSICAL STUDIES Subject Code CAS CL - Classical Studies Course Number 230 Course/Co-curricular Title The Golden Age of Latin Literature Short Title Gold Latin Lit This is: A New Course Did you participate in a CTL workshop for the development of this activity? No Bulletin (40-word) Course Description An in-depth exploration in English of some of the greatest poets from Ancient Rome, including Catullus, Virgil, and Ovid. Examines the Romans' engagement with Greek literature and the development of their own "Classics," from personal love poetry to profound epic. Prerequisites,
    [Show full text]
  • Catullus, Memmius, and Bithynia
    Catullus, Memmius, and Bithynia Gaius Memmius was the son-in-law of Sulla, an orator who won backhanded praise from Cicero (Brut. 247), seducer of the wife of Marcus Lucullus (Cic. Att. 1. 18. 3) and a fierce adversary of his brother (Plut. Cat. Mi. 29. 5-8), a poet whose immodesty impressed Ovid (Tr. 2. 433), a praetor (Cic. Q. fr. 1. 2. 16), a candidate for the consulship, a disgraced exile, the probable but imperfect patron of Lucretius, and a perfect villain for Catullus, and a successful military commander, hailed by his troops as “Imperator.” The last is evidenced by a denarius (427 Crawford). The obverse presents the head of Ceres, facing right, with C∙ MEMMI C ∙ F ∙ reading downwards. On the reverse is a trophy and a kneeling captive with hands tied behind his back; reading downwards on the left is the title IMPERATOR and on the right C ∙ MEMMIUS. To my knowledge this remarkable coin is never brought up in discussions of Catullus, despite the fact that Catullus would have been serving in the cohors of Memmius at the time he was acclaimed imperator. Crawford and others date the coin to 56, following the consensus that Memmius was governor of Bithynia in 57. This presents a problem, for it seems unlikely that Memmius could have engaged in any significant military campaign nine years after the province had been pacified (Cic. Agr. 2. 47) and a full five years after Pompey’s settlement of the East. It is much more likely that Memmius’ victory was earlier, at a time when there was still potential unrest in the area of Bithynia following Mithradates’ resurgence in 67.
    [Show full text]
  • Epistemology As a Foundation for Epicurean Thought Emma E
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 Epistemology as a Foundation for Epicurean Thought Emma E. Hughes Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES EPISTEMOLOGY AS A FOUNDATION FOR EPICUREAN THOUGHT By EMMA E. HUGHES A Thesis submitted to the Department of Classics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2012 Emma E. Hughes defended this thesis on March 26th, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: Svetla Slaveva-Griffin Professor Directing Thesis Timothy Stover Committee Member Nathanael Stein Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract.......................................................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER ONE: A NEW LOOK AT AN OLD SCHOOL ..................................................5 CHAPTER TWO: PROBLEMS IN EPICUREAN EPISTEMOLOGY ...............................18 CHAPTER THREE: AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATION......................................30 CHAPTER FOUR: CONCLUSION .....................................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age: Virgil by W
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age: Virgil by W. Y. Sellar This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age: Virgil Author: W. Y. Sellar Release Date: October 29, 2010 [Ebook 34163] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ROMAN POETS OF THE AUGUSTAN AGE: VIRGIL*** THE ROMAN POETS OF THE AUGUSTAN AGE: VIRGIL. BY W. Y. SELLAR, M.A., LL.D. LATE PROFESSOR OF HUMANITY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH AND FELLOW OF ORIEL COLLEGE, OXFORD iv The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age: Virgil THIRD EDITION OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS AMEN HOUSE, E.C. 4 London Edinburgh Glasgow New York Toronto Melbourne Capetown Bombay Calcutta Madras HUMPHREY MILFORD PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY vi The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age: Virgil IMPRESSION OF 1941 FIRST EDITION, 1877 THIRD EDITION, 1897 vii PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN TO E. L. LUSHINGTON, ESQ., D.C.L., LL.D., ETC. LATE PROFESSOR OF GREEK IN THE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW. MY DEAR LUSHINGTON, Any old pupil of yours, in finishing a work either of classical scholarship or illustrative of ancient literature, must feel that he owes to you, probably more than to any one else, the impulse which directed him to these studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Goddess, Neoteric Poetry, and Menippean Satire
    The Great Goddess, Neoteric Poetry, and Menippean Satire Most scholars assume that Catullus’ Attis poem (63) inspired Maecenas to compose a poem on the same topic and in the same meter: Maecenas is one of only three Romans authors who wrote galliambics, the meter special to Cybele and her cult, and since other fragments of Maecenas’ poetry clearly imitate Catullus’ hendecasyllables, the logical conclusion is that Maecenas’ galliambics were another attempt to imitate his more successful neoteric predecessor. As I will show, however, Catullus was not the only source of inspiration for galliambic meter, just as the Magna Mater was not a topic confined to neoteric poets. It is true that among the many qualities that define neoteric poetry of the late Roman republic, a salient one is the subject of the Great Mother, or Cybele, whose myth was possibly first rendered as a mannered miniature epic or epyllion by some Hellenistic poet, though that original does not survive. In addition to his own poem on the subject in which the recent convert Attis regrets his decision to serve the goddess as a eunuch priest, we learn from Catullus (35) that his friend Caecilius was writing a poem about the Magna Mater, which, if it was ever completed, might have also been in galliambic meter. But neoteric poets were not the only ones concerned with the Great Goddess’ myth and the bizarre, frenzied practices that surrounded her cult. The polymath Marcus Terentius Varro also took up the theme, writing about the establishment of her cult at Rome in the De Lingua Latina (6.15) and other works.
    [Show full text]
  • Catullus, As Can’T Be Counted by Spies Nor an Evil Tongue Bewitch Us
    &$78//867+(32(06 7UDQVODWHGE\$6.OLQH ã Copyright 2001 A. S. Kline, All Rights Reserved This work may be freely reproduced, stored and transmitted, electronically or otherwise, for any NON-COMMERCIAL purpose. 2 &RQWHQWV 1. The Dedication: to Cornelius............................... 8 2. Tears for Lesbia’s Sparrow.................................. 9 2b. Atalanta.............................................................. 9 3. The Death of Lesbia’s Sparrow ......................... 10 4. His Boat ............................................................ 11 5. Let’s Live and Love: to Lesbia .......................... 13 6. Flavius’s Girl: to Flavius ................................... 14 7. How Many Kisses: to Lesbia ............................. 15 8. Advice: to himself.............................................. 16 9. Back from Spain: to Veranius............................ 17 10. Home Truths for Varus’s girl: to Varus........... 18 11. Words against Lesbia: to Furius and Aurelius . 19 12. Stop Stealing the Napkins! : to Asinius Marrucinus............................................................. 21 13. Invitation: to Fabullus...................................... 22 14. What a Book! : to Calvus the Poet................... 23 15. A Warning: to Aurelius.................................... 25 16. A Rebuke: to Aurelius and Furius.................... 26 17. The Town of Cologna Veneta.......................... 27 21. Greedy: To Aurelius. ....................................... 30 22. People Who Live in Glass Houses: to Varus ... 31
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Presented by Paul W
    Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Presented by Paul W. Collins Copyright 2005 by Paul W. Collins Julius Caesar By William Shakespeare Presented by Paul W. Collins All rights reserved under the International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Except as permitted under the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this work nay be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, audio or video recording, or other, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Contact: [email protected] Note: Spoken lines from Shakespeare’s drama are in the public domain, as is the Globe (1864) edition of his plays, which provided the basic text of the speeches in this new version of Julius Caesar. But Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare: Presented by Paul W. Collins, is a copyrighted work, and is made available for your personal use only, in reading and study. Student, beware: This is a presentation of Julius Caesar, not a scholarly work, so you should be sure your teacher, instructor or professor considers it acceptable as a reference before quoting characters’ comments or thoughts from it in your report or term paper. 2 Chapter One Ceremony and Dissent crowd of jubilating common folk gathers in celebration along a thoroughfare near the A Capitol in ancient Rome—smiling artisans, tradesmen clerks and laborers, and mothers laughing happily with their young children. Everyday chores have been left to wait, as the people come forth to hail their popular leader. They are welcoming him in ceremonial triumph as he returns from battle in Spain, where he has defeated a rebellion led by sons of the late ruler Pompey and several generals supported by hidebound Senate factions—in a conflict of Roman against Roman.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy.Pdf
    Philosophy 1 PHIL:1401 Matters of Life and Death 3 s.h. Contemporary ethical controversies with life and death Philosophy implications; topics may include famine, brain death, animal ethics, abortion, torture, terrorism, capital punishment. GE: Chair Values and Culture. • David Cunning PHIL:1636 Principles of Reasoning: Argument and Undergraduate major: philosophy (B.A.) Debate 3 s.h. Undergraduate minor: philosophy Critical thinking and its application to arguments and debates. Graduate degrees: M.A. in philosophy; Ph.D. in philosophy GE: Quantitative or Formal Reasoning. Faculty: https://clas.uiowa.edu/philosophy/people/faculty PHIL:1861 Introduction to Philosophy 3 s.h. Website: https://clas.uiowa.edu/philosophy/ Varied topics; may include personal identity, existence of The Department of Philosophy offers programs of study for God, philosophical skepticism, nature of mind and reality, undergraduate and graduate students. A major in philosophy time travel, and the good life; readings, films. GE: Values and develops abilities useful for careers in many fields and for any Culture. situation requiring clear, systematic thinking. PHIL:1902 Philosophy Lab: The Meaning of Life 1 s.h. Further exploration of PHIL:1033 course material with the The department also administers the interdisciplinary professor in a smaller group. undergraduate major in ethics and public policy, which it offers jointly with the Department of Economics and the PHIL:1904 Philosophy Lab: Liberty and the Pursuit of Department of Sociology and Criminology; see Ethics and Happiness 1 s.h. Public Policy in the Catalog. Further exploration of PHIL:1034 course material with the professor in a smaller group. Programs PHIL:1950 Philosophy Club 1-3 s.h.
    [Show full text]
  • Optima Carme: a Reexamination of the Nurse in the Ciris By
    OPTIMA CARME: A REEXAMINATION OF THE NURSE IN THE CIRIS BY CASEY LYNN HUGHES Submitted to the graduate degree program in Classics and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Chairperson: Dr. Tara Welch Dr. Anthony Corbeill Dr. Pamela Gordon Date defended: 10 May 2017 The Thesis Committee for CASEY LYNN HUGHES certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: OPTIMA CARME: A REEXAMINATION OF THE NURSE IN THE CIRIS Chairperson: Dr. Tara Welch Date approved: 10 May 2017 ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines the Ciris, a Pseudo-Vergilian epyllion of uncertain date, and analyzes the figure of the nurse Carme, a character who has largely been ignored in previous studies of the poem. The Ciris narrates the story of Scylla of Megara and how she betrayed her father, King Nisus, because of her love for Minos, King of Crete. While nurses are typical stock characters in Greek and Roman literature, I will show how the character of Carme becomes more than Scylla’s nurse. Although she embodies the qualities of many nurses from various genres before her, the Ciris poet also expands her role, briefly transforming an otherwise minor character into a second heroine. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One: Introduction 1 Chapter Two: Influential Nurses 11 Chapter Three: The Heroine Nurse 32 Conclusion 53 Bibliography 57 Appendix A 60 Appendix B 61 iv Chapter One Introduction The Ciris is a first century B.C. or first century A.D. epyllion about Scylla, who betrays her father Nisus, king of Megara, because of her love for Minos, king of Crete.
    [Show full text]