New Runway Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Runway Project New Runway Project PRELIMINARY DRAFT MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN VOLUME A: BACKGROUND AND NEED SECTIONS 1-7 MAY 2018 03 Options and Alternatives 70 New Runway Project | Preliminary Draft Major Development Plan May 2018 03 Options and Alternatives Options03 and Alternatives This section provides detail of what options and alternative where considered when planning for the New Runway Project (NRP). Detail is also provided on the following areas: • What options were considered and why they are not viable? • Why is the new runway the preferred option to meet the projected demand? 71 03 Options and Alternatives As part of the initial planning for 3.1 No-Change Scenario customers (public and businesses) the new runway, several options and a reduction in passenger The existing runway system reaches were identified and assessed before growth. Further information on capacity during peak periods and determining that the new runway is delays is provided in Section 2. this was most evident in 2013. Not the most appropriate development constructing additional runway Figure 3-1 shows the relationship to meet the future demand for air capacity and making no changes to between the likely average delay at services for Perth. the way in which the current runway Perth Airport and projected aircraft • no-change scenario system operates will: movements if no additional runway • more from existing infrastructure • impact the efficient movement capacity is provided. Simulation at Perth Airport of aircraft and cause increasing modelling has shown that the • increased use of other airports delays for flights, and average flight delay would increase • Perth Airport aviation • constrain growth, seeing a from an average of a five-minute development plan options reduction in the number of delay in 2016 to 34 minutes by 2045. • new runway alternate locations people that would otherwise have With this being an annual average • preferred new runway option travelled by air to and from Perth. delay, in 2045 there would be some aircraft experiencing delays of These impacts would have a flow-on several hours daily. effect and would result in economic losses to Perth and the wider State. An average 34 minute delay is unacceptable to airlines, passengers 3.1.1 Delays Without the and aviation dependant companies. New Runway Significant impacts are experienced The United States Federal Aviation when delays start to consistently Administration (FAA) considers be five to seven-minutes. Therefore, a flight delayed if, for operational to reduce the likelihood of delay, reasons, air traffic holds an aircraft airlines would need to either: at the gate, short of the runway, on • change flight times to times of the runway, on a taxiway, and/or in lower runway demand, a holding configuration anywhere • introduce larger aircraft to achieve en-route. Therefore, by definition, a higher volumes of passenger per delay to an aircraft on the ground aircraft movement, or is the time taken for an aircraft to • discontinue services by pass through the runway system repositioning aircraft to routes/ (including airspace) unconstrained, markets without the delays. compared to the time taken for an A decision to change the time of aircraft to pass through the system a flight at one port has a flow-on when constraints exist. impact to fleet scheduling (how Delays to aircraft operations cause aircraft are allocated the roster of disruptions to the travelling public, flights), passenger connections extra costs to airlines and their to other flights, and crewing and Domestic aircraft ('000) 300 International aircraft ('000) 35 General aviation aircraft ('000) 30 250 Average delay (minutes) 25 200 20 150 15 100 10 50 5 in minutes Delay Aircraft Movements (000’s) Movements Aircraft 0 0 2021 2031 2018 2019 2041 2027 2037 2022 2025 2023 2032 2035 2033 2028 2038 2024 2026 2029 2039 2036 2042 2034 2045 2043 2020 2030 2044 2040 Figure 3‑1 Comparison of likely average delay with aircraft movements Source: NATS and Tourism Futures International 72 New Runway Project | Preliminary Draft Major Development Plan May 2018 03 Options and Alternatives ground-handling staff rostering. and the need to integrate with airline industry and its passengers Pilots and flight crews operate to constraints at Australia’s East Coast of delays was $72 million per year. strict rostering restrictions, and airports, particularly the night time Qantas publicly stated that it given the long flight distances curfew at Sydney Airport and time estimated that the annual impact to and from Perth, this can have zone differences. Intrastate airline of runway delays at Perth Airport a significant cost impact. Thus, flight schedules reflect the strong cost $10.8 million per year, while the airlines have limited scheduling market preference/requirement Chamber of Minerals and Energy opportunities or ‘windows’ for air services that integrate with Western Australia stated that a within which Perth flights can be the operating logistics of resource one-hour delay at a mine site cost scheduled. operations (mines and LNG plants). approximately $100,000. If airlines are unable to schedule The impact on air services would 3.1.2 Constraints on Growth services in response to market differ in some respects for each Without the New Runway preference and wider logistical market if Perth Airport does imperatives, the viability of the not have the capacity to meet The no-change scenario would services is compromised, and flights airline scheduling preferences/ constrain the number of movements are likely to be discontinued, either requirements, however the following that can occur at Perth Airport. because they become loss making, common impacts can be expected: The extent to which airlines will or because it becomes more • loss of services (less choice for forgo scheduling additional flights profitable to deploy the aircraft to Western Australians in terms of in the absence of additional runway other markets. where to fly and when to fly), capacity was modelled based on • higher airfares due to higher unit aircraft movement projections. In addition, the competing operating costs for remaining services and Simulation modelling completed by environments of international, less supply of aircraft seats to Perth Airport shows that by 2045, interstate and intrastate airlines meet the available demand, and without additional runway capacity dictate the need for flights to • loss of economic opportunity for being provided, approximately 140 depart in line with set schedules. Western Australia, reflecting the aircraft movements will be forgone International airline schedules reflect knock-on impact on tourism and each day (or approximately 51,000 both market preferences and the resources companies. per year). need to integrate with schedules in large hub airports in Asia and the These costs were quantified at the An economic impact assessment Middle East and through to endpoint height of the mining boom when considered a more conservative destinations, particularly Europe and demand for capacity peaked. capacity restriction of approximately UK. Interstate airline flight schedules In 2012, a State Treasury report 25,000 aircraft movements per year. reflect both market preference estimated that the impact to the This is shown in Figure 3-2. 300 With new runway Without new runway 200 100 0 Aircraft Aircraft (000’s) Movements 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030 2033 2036 2039 2042 2045 Figure 3‑2 Comparison of annual total aircraft movements with and without the new runway Source: ACIL Allen Consulting 40000 With new runway Without new runway 30000 20000 10000 Passengers (000’s) Passengers 0 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030 2033 2036 2039 2042 2045 Figure 3‑3 Comparison of annual total passenger numbers with and without the new runway from 2018 to 2045 Source: ACIL Allen Consulting New Runway Project | Volume A: Background and Need 73 03 Options and Alternatives The total number of domestic 3.1.3 Demand Management 3.1.3.2 Aircraft Size Restrictions and international passengers at If the new runway is not constructed, Aircraft size restrictions is when Perth Airport with and without in an effort to ameliorate the an airport imposes minimum sizes additional runway capacity in each adverse consequences of for aircraft operating during a peak year to 2045 is shown in Figure uncontrolled demand, including period. The effect of this policy 3-3. The passenger projections delays and congestion, demand would be to cause airlines to use without additional runway capacity management initiatives (both larger aircraft at peak times, thereby incorporate an ‘up-gauging’ factor economic and regulatory) could be maintaining the level of passenger whereby it is assumed that airlines further explored. These initiatives capacity but reducing the overall will respond to the constraint, in include peak pricing and aircraft number of aircraft that use the part, by increasing aircraft size. size restrictions. However, industry runway. This would also require the Specifically, it is assumed that experience has shown these are not destination or departure airport passenger movements per aircraft effective over a long period of time. to be able to accommodate these would grow at 0.3 per cent a year larger aircraft, which could see many without additional runway capacity. 3.1.3.1 Peak (or Congestion) regional airports needing to be The unmet domestic and Pricing upgraded or expanded. Peak pricing involves charging international passenger demand Many of the flights that operate airlines higher prices to use the in the absence of additional during the Perth Airport’s peak airport in periods of high demand. runway capacity (the difference periods service FIFO operations and In theory, this would act as a in passenger numbers with and regional Western Australia. As such, price signal to airlines to move without additional runway capacity) the demand management measures, flights to a time of day when it is is shown in Figure 3-4. By 2045, if they were effective, would cheaper for them to operate.
Recommended publications
  • Of the 90 YEARS of the RAAF
    90 YEARS OF THE RAAF - A SNAPSHOT HISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. Disclaimer The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defence, the Royal Australian Air Force or the Government of Australia, or of any other authority referred to in the text. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise, for any statements made in this document. Release This document is approved for public release. Portions of this document may be quoted or reproduced without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry 90 years of the RAAF : a snapshot history / Royal Australian Air Force, Office of Air Force History ; edited by Chris Clark (RAAF Historian). 9781920800567 (pbk.) Australia. Royal Australian Air Force.--History. Air forces--Australia--History. Clark, Chris. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Office of Air Force History. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Air Power Development Centre. 358.400994 Design and layout by: Owen Gibbons DPSAUG031-11 Published and distributed by: Air Power Development Centre TCC-3, Department of Defence PO Box 7935 CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 AUSTRALIA Telephone: + 61 2 6266 1355 Facsimile: + 61 2 6266 1041 Email: [email protected] Website: www.airforce.gov.au/airpower Chief of Air Force Foreword Throughout 2011, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has been commemorating the 90th anniversary of its establishment on 31 March 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Trades Contents Introduction to the Take Your Trade Further in the Air Force
    AIR FORCE TRADES CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO THE TAKE YOUR TRADE FURTHER IN THE AIR FORCE .................................4 QUALIFIED TRADES ...........................................................................12 AIR FORCE TRADES AIRCRAFT SPRAY PAINTER ...............................................................13 ELECTRICIAN ....................................................................................14 It may come as a surprise to you but the Air Force has a lot to offer tradies in a vast variety of jobs. Becoming FITTER & TURNER .............................................................................15 part of one of Australia’s most dynamic organisations will give you the opportunity to work on some of the TRAINEESHIPS ..................................................................................16 most advanced aircraft and sophisticated equipment available. You’ll be in an environment where you will be AIRCRAFT ARMAMENT TECHNICIAN .................................................17 challenged and have an opportunity to gain new skills, or even further the skills you already have. AERONAUTICAL LIFE SUPPORT FITTER .............................................18 AIRCRAFT TECHNICIAN .....................................................................19 AVIONICS TECHNICIAN ......................................................................20 CARPENTER ......................................................................................21 COMMUNICATION ELECTRONIC TECHNICIAN ....................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Airspace Assessment Tool (Paat)
    PROTECTED AIRSPACE ASSESSMENT TOOL (PAAT) USER MANUAL March 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 STATUTORY APPROVALS PROCESS 2 2.1 PRESCRIBED AIRSPACE 2 2.2 PERTH AIRPORT ASSESSMENT PROCESS 3 2.2.1 PAAT 3 3.0 USING PAAT 4 3.1 REGISTERING AS A NEW USER 4 3.2 USER ACCOUNT 7 3.3 CHANGING YOUR PASSWORD 7 3.4 LODGING A NEW APPLICATION 7 3.4.1 SITE NAME 8 3.4.2 ON-SITE MOBILE 8 3.4.3 TYPE 8 3.4.4 MAKE 8 3.4.5 MODEL 8 3.4.6 REGO 8 3.4.7 MAX OPERATING HEIGHT 8 3.4.8 MAX OPERATING RADIUS 8 3.4.9 REQUESTED OPERATING HEIGHT 8 3.4.10 REQUESTED START DATE 9 3.4.11 REQUESTED END DATE 9 3.4.12 OPERATING TIME 9 3.4.13 PURPOSE OF ACTIVITY 9 3.4.14 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 9 3.4.15 MAP FUNCTIONS 9 3.4.16 MARKING A LOCATION 10 3.4.17 DELETING A LOCATION 11 3.4.18 SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION 11 3.5 REVISING AN APPLICATION 11 3.6 VIEWING OPEN AND CLOSED APPLICATIONS 11 3.7 CHECKING THE STATUS OF AN APPLICATION 12 3.7.1 APPLICATION STATUS LEVELS 12 4.0 HOW TO CONTACT PERTH AIRPORT 13 5.0 FAQ 14 1.0 INTRODUCTION The protection of airspace for Perth Airport’s current and future needs is essential to provide a safe, predictable environment for the arrivals and departures of aircraft in all weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australia Manual of Air Traffic Services Supplementary Procedures
    Western Australia Manual of Air Traffic Services Supplementary Procedures Procedure ATS-PROC-0002 Version 39 Effective 21 May 2021 Authorised: High Density Services (Southern FIR) ,Terminal Services (Southern FIR) ,Primary Aerodrome Svcs - Twr (Sth FIR) ATC STAND1 – Headquarters 44 Wing ATTENTION Temporary amendments may apply Ensure document is current before use © Airservices Australia 2012 1 of 42 Western Australia Manual of Air Traffic Services Supplementary Procedures Change summary Western Australia Manual of Air Traffic Services Supplementary Procedures Version 39: Effective 21 May 2021 Location of change Change description CRC All New Template 8344 Cover Page Amended Authorisers Various Formatting Corrections 2.5.1.1 Note Changed to Body text 3.3.1.2 Level for aircraft transiting into class E removed IAW Class E PIR. Paragraph reformatted. 3.3.2 Jet/Non- Jet descriptors added Additional tracking point added for jet aircraft tracking via AVNEX Additional tracking point added for jet aircraft tracking via OTLED Additional route clearance added for aircraft planned via CANRI for destination YNOV 3.4.3 Inclusion of requirement for agency responsible for initiating non-standard tracking to notify PHF 5 RAAF contact numbers updated. This document was created using Air Traffic Services (ATS) Operational Document Template (C-TEMP0256) Version 5. View change summaries for the previous six months Table of contents 1 Definitions ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    WESTERN AUSTRALIA __________ INDEX TO PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL and LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY __________ INDEX TO QUESTIONS AND SPEECHES __________ FORTIETH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION 11 FEBRUARY 2020 TO 4 DECEMBER 2020 __________ 69° ELIZABETH II __________ 2020 INDEX TO QUESTIONS AND SPEECHES ACTING PRESIDENT (Hon Adele Farina) Education and Training, TAFE fees — amendment on the amendment — ruling by Acting President, 739; motion, as amended, 741 ACTING SPEAKER (Mr I.C. Blayney) Treasury and Finance, state economy, McGowan government’s performance — removal of order, 2502 ACTING SPEAKER (Ms J.M. Freeman) Coronavirus, interstate travel restrictions, health advice — standing orders suspension motion, as amended, 6940 Corruption and Crime Commission, “Review of Recommendations Made to the Department of Justice Arising from Six Reports”, correction, 4464 ACTING SPEAKER (Mr T.J. Healy) Regional Development, department, agriculture budget — removal of order, 4200 Transport, minister, member for Riverton, allegations against — standing orders suspension motion, as amended, 982 ACTING SPEAKER (Ms L. Mettam) Coronavirus, regional tourism, government support — standing orders suspension motion, as amended, 2516 Family and Domestic Violence, support services, funding — standing orders suspension motion, as amended, 4407 Premier, state economy — standing orders suspension motion, as amended, 3931 Public Accounts Committee, inquiry into the use of state funding by the Western Australian Football Commission, extension of reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Short Investigations Bulletin
    InsertAviation document Short Investigations title Bulletin LocationIssue 30 | Date ATSB Transport Safety Report Investigation [InsertAviation Mode] Short OccurrenceInvestigations Investigation XX-YYYY-####AB-2014-064 Final – 26 May 2014 Released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 4150 (24 hours) Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117, from overseas +61 2 6247 3117 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2014 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form license agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly.
    [Show full text]
  • What Options Were Considered
    What options were considered As part of the initial planning for the new runway, several options were identified and assessed before determining that the new runway is the most appropriate development to meet the future demand for air services for Perth. Planning Location for the new runway identified in the 1970s by a joint Commonwealth and State Government Committee Support growth Providing essential transport infrastructure capacity and supporting WA’s economic development Connecting people and places Furthering Western Australia’s social and cultural development and connecting WA to the world The new runway represents the best option to support the international competitiveness of the State’s critical export industries, including resources, tourism, international study and agriculture. When do we need a How is the new new runway? runway funded? The need for an additional runway at Perth Airport was Perth Airport is located on approximately 2,105 hectares of land owned by the first recommended more than 40 years ago by a joint Commonwealth of Australia. Commonwealth and State Government Committee In 1997, the airport was privatised investigating Perth’s planning requirements. under a long term lease with oversight remaining with the Commonwealth of Recent modelling shows that an additional runway is needed to meet Australia. Perth Airport is operated by the demand of intrastate, interstate and international services to and Perth Airport Pty Ltd, which is a wholly from Perth. The need for the new runway is driven by the demand for owned subsidiary of Perth Airport arrivals and departures in a given hour. Development Group Pty Ltd (PADG).
    [Show full text]
  • State Planning Policy 5.3 Land Use Planning in the Vicinity of Jandakot Airport
    State Planning Policy 5.3 Land Use Planning in the Vicinity of Jandakot Airport January 2017 Prepared under Part Three of the Planning and Development Act 2005 by the Western Australian Planning Commission click to follow 1. CITATION 1 APPENDIX 1 - BUILDING SITE ACCEPTABILITY 9 2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGOUND 1 APPENDIX 2 2.1 Importance of - INDOOR DESIGN SOUND Disclaimer Jandakot Airport 1 This document has been produced by the LEVELS 10 Department of Planning on behalf of the 2.2 Aircraft noise Western Australian Planning Commission. Any measurement 1 APPENDIX 3: representation, statement, opinion or advice 2.3 Australian Noise NOTIFICATION ABOUT expressed or implied in this publication is Exposure Forecast 1 made in good faith and on the basis that the AIRCRAFT NOISE TO BE Government, its employees and agents are 2.4 Policy measures 1 PLACED ON PROPERTY TITLE 11 not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken 3. APPLICATION or not taken, as the case may be, in respect FIGURE 1: FRAME AREA 12 of any representation, statement, opinion or OF THE POLICY 1 advice referred to herein. Professional advice 3.1 Other policies that should be obtained before applying the relate to this policy 1 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 13 information contained in this document to particular circumstances. 4. POLICY OBJECTIVES 2 REFERENCES 13 © Western Australian Planning Commission 5. POLICY MEASURES 2 Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission 5.1 Interpretation 2 Gordon Stephenson House 140 William Street 5.2 Areas below 20 ANEF 2 Perth WA 6000 5.3 Areas between 20 Locked Bag 2506 ANEF and 25 ANEF 3 Perth WA 6001 5.4 Areas above 25 ANEF 4 Published January 2017 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Engine Failure Involving Fokker 100, VH-FWI, 41 Km South East of Geraldton Airport, Western Australia on 9 July 2019
    Engine failure involving Fokker 100, VH-FWI 41 km south-east of Geraldton Airport, Western Australia on 9 July 2019 ATSB Transport Safety Report Aviation Occurrence Investigation (Defined) AO-2019-033 Final – 4 February 2021 Cover photo: Copyright ® TommyNg (Planespotters.net) Released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 2463 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Email: [email protected] Website: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Safety Investigation Report 200303579
    AVIATION SAFETY INVESTIGATION 200303579 Cessna 404, VH-ANV Jandakot Airport, WA 11 August 2003 Released under the provisions of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003. Front cover photo by George Canciani © ISBN 1 877071 92 7 March 2005 This report was produced by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB), PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608. Readers are advised that the ATSB investigates for the sole purpose of enhancing safety. Consequently, reports are confined to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose. As ATSB believes that safety information is of greatest value if it is passed on for the use of others, copyright restrictions do not apply to material printed in this report. Readers are encouraged to copy or reprint for further distribution, but should acknowledge ATSB as the source. ii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY viii 1 FACTUAL INFORMATION 1 1.1 History of the flight 1 1.2 Injuries to persons 2 1.3 Damage to aircraft 3 1.4 Other damage 3 1.5 Personnel information 3 1.6 Aircraft information 3 1.6.1 Aircraft certification 4 1.6.2 Recent maintenance history 4 1.6.3 Engine and propeller information 4 1.6.4 Fuel system information 4 1.6.5 Quality of the fuel 5 1.6.6 Aircraft flight controls & associated systems information 6 1.6.7 Aircraft operating weight 6 1.6.8 Aircraft equipment configuration 7 1.7 Meteorological information 7 1.8 Aids to navigation 7 1.9 Communications 7 1.10 Aerodrome information 8 1.10.1 General 8 1.10.2 Runway 24R information 8 1.10.3 Published
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Categorisation List
    UNCLASSIFIED List of Security Controlled Airport Categorisation September 2018 *Please note that this table will continue to be updated upon new category approvals and gazettal Category Airport Legal Trading Name State Category Operations Other Information Commencement CATEGORY 1 ADELAIDE Adelaide Airport Ltd SA 1 22/12/2011 BRISBANE Brisbane Airport Corporation Limited QLD 1 22/12/2011 CAIRNS Cairns Airport Pty Ltd QLD 1 22/12/2011 CANBERRA Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd ACT 1 22/12/2011 GOLD COAST Gold Coast Airport Pty Ltd QLD 1 22/12/2011 DARWIN Darwin International Airport Pty Limited NT 1 22/12/2011 Australia Pacific Airports (Melbourne) MELBOURNE VIC 1 22/12/2011 Pty. Limited PERTH Perth Airport Pty Ltd WA 1 22/12/2011 SYDNEY Sydney Airport Corporation Limited NSW 1 22/12/2011 CATEGORY 2 BROOME Broome International Airport Pty Ltd WA 2 22/12/2011 CHRISTMAS ISLAND Toll Remote Logistics Pty Ltd WA 2 22/12/2011 HOBART Hobart International Airport Pty Limited TAS 2 29/02/2012 NORFOLK ISLAND Norfolk Island Regional Council NSW 2 22/12/2011 September 2018 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED PORT HEDLAND PHIA Operating Company Pty Ltd WA 2 22/12/2011 SUNSHINE COAST Sunshine Coast Airport Pty Ltd QLD 2 29/06/2012 TOWNSVILLE AIRPORT Townsville Airport Pty Ltd QLD 2 19/12/2014 CATEGORY 3 ALBURY Albury City Council NSW 3 22/12/2011 ALICE SPRINGS Alice Springs Airport Pty Limited NT 3 11/01/2012 AVALON Avalon Airport Australia Pty Ltd VIC 3 22/12/2011 Voyages Indigenous Tourism Australia NT 3 22/12/2011 AYERS ROCK Pty Ltd BALLINA Ballina Shire Council NSW 3 22/12/2011 BRISBANE WEST Brisbane West Wellcamp Airport Pty QLD 3 17/11/2014 WELLCAMP Ltd BUNDABERG Bundaberg Regional Council QLD 3 18/01/2012 CLONCURRY Cloncurry Shire Council QLD 3 29/02/2012 COCOS ISLAND Toll Remote Logistics Pty Ltd WA 3 22/12/2011 COFFS HARBOUR Coffs Harbour City Council NSW 3 22/12/2011 DEVONPORT Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty.
    [Show full text]
  • The RSAF Marks 25 Years of Training in Pearce, Australia
    The RSAF Marks 25 Years of Training in Pearce, Australia 12 Nov 2018 Senior Minister of State Heng Chee How (right) with Commander of the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) Air Force Training Command Colonel (COL) Kevin Goh (left), after unveiling the commemorative PC- 21 aircraft tail fin at the 25th anniversary commemorative event in Royal Australian Air Forc.. Senior Minister of State for Defence Mr Heng Chee How visited the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF)'s Flying Training Institute (FTI) Detachment in Pearce, Australia, for their 25th anniversary celebrations earlier today. This morning in Perth, Mr Heng was also hosted to breakfast by Governor of Western Australia and former Minister for Defence Kim Beazley, 1 AC. During the breakfast, Mr Heng and Mr Beazley reaffirmed the close and long-standing relationship between Singapore and Australia. Mr Heng also thanked Mr Beazley for Australia's strong support for the Singapore Armed Force's training in Western Australia. The visit to the RSAF's FTI detachment was hosted by Commander of the RSAF's Air Force Training Command Colonel Kevin Goh at the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Base Pearce. During the visit, Mr Heng witnessed a combined flypast by the RSAF's and RAAF's Pilatus PC-21 trainer aircraft, unveiled the commemorative plaque, and participated in a symbolic tree-planting ceremony. Speaking at the event, Mr Heng thanked the RAAF for its support for the RSAF's training in Pearce. He said, "The Singapore Armed Forces and the Australian Defence Force share a long history of military cooperation, having extensive interactions that include bilateral and multilateral exercises, mutual visits, and professional exchanges.
    [Show full text]