DOCSLIB.ORG

“We of the New Left”: a Gender History of the Student Union for Peace Action from the Anti-Nuclear Movement to Women's Li

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“We of the New Left”: a Gender History of the Student Union for Peace Action from the Anti-Nuclear Movement to Women's Li “We of the New Left”: A Gender History of the Student Union for Peace Action from the Anti-Nuclear Movement to Women’s Liberation by Victoria Campbell Windle A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Victoria Campbell Windle 2017 Examining Committee Membership The following served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. External Examiner Dominique Marshall Professor Supervisor(s) Jim Walker Professor Internal Member Heather MacDougall Associate Professor Internal-external Member Anna Drake Assistant Professor Other Member(s) Ian Milligan Associate Professor ii Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract The Student Union for Peace Action (SUPA), was a Canadian group of New Leftists that formed a multi-issue movement for radical social change in the 1960s. SUPA emerged out of the Combined Universities Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, and organized around peace, racial and economic equality, and educational freedom between December 1964 and September 1967. At its final conference, four SUPA women, Judy Bernstein, Peggy Morton, Linda Seese, and Myrna Wood, presented a paper titled, “Sisters, Brothers, Lovers…Listen…,” in which they argued for the addition of gender equality to this list of New Leftist concerns. Following this conference, Morton, Seese, and Wood formed Canada’s first women’s liberation group in Toronto. This dissertation explores both the character of SUPA’s New Leftism, and the rise and articulation of a feminist consciousness within the group. The definition of New Leftist activism is contested among scholars. This study builds upon an historiographical challenge to New Leftist narratives that focus squarely on young white middle-class men, by arguing that its history belongs to several other actors, such as older leftists, civil rights activists, and women’s liberationists. SUPA illuminates a definition of New Leftism as a collection of overlapping movements around issues such as nuclear disarmament, economic and racial justice, and eventually, gender equality. Using a gender-conscious approach, this dissertation examines how these movements converged within SUPA, and how each served as a backdrop to the development and expression of a feminist consciousness that led to the production of “Sisters, Brothers, Lovers...Listen...” in 1967. By examining SUPA’s history through a lens of gender, this dissertation presents new understandings of the impact of the group’s strategic shifts upon activists, and of its operations as iv a movement. It further complicates the conventional representation of activist women in the group as secretaries and maternal figures, which has developed out of isolated readings of “Sisters, Brothers, Lovers...Listen...” A gender study of the multiple sites of SUPA’s movement activity demonstrates that while gender expectations certainly shaped women’s experiences, they did not have a uniform impact, and did not impose one-dimensional activist identities upon women in the group; rather, as this dissertation argues, SUPA women’s participation in the movement took different forms, and resulted in multifaceted activist identities. Their experiences were marked by a tension between subordination and empowerment, and it was from this position that they analyzed their place in the movement, and called for the inclusion of gender equality to the list of New Leftist demands. v Acknowledgements In December 2013, a few months into my archival research on the Student Union for Peace Action (SUPA), I came across a reflection on SUPA from the 1960s with this prefatory note from activist Tony Hyde: “People in SUPA do not like to go over their history, and having just completed this paper I can understand why; it is a uniquely painful task.”1 While initially unsettled by the remark, I quickly discovered that former SUPA activists would graciously and enthusiastically talk with me about the group’s history, that I would have incredible support while navigating the usual pains of dissertation writing, and that producing this paper would be a uniquely rewarding task. I would first like to extend my appreciation to the activists who shared their memories and perspectives with me: Peter Boothroyd, John Cleveland, John Conway, Daniel Drache, Nancy Hannum, Jim Harding, Brewster Kneen, Joan Kuyek, Peggy Morton, Clayton Ruby, Linda Seese, Harvey Shepherd, Peter Warrian, Myrna Wood, and Cathleen Kneen, who sadly passed away during the production of this dissertation. I am sincerely thankful to each of you for sharing your time and stories with me so generously. The Tri-University Graduate Program in History has provided extraordinary teaching, guidance, and support throughout my doctoral studies. Julia Roberts, Alan Gordon, and David Monod, thank you for your course instruction. Thank you also to Donna Hayes and Bonnie Bishop for your hard work and kind assistance, and to Andrew Hunt for your dedication to the students of the Tri-U program. 1 McMaster University William Ready Division of Archives and Research Collections, Combined Universities Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament-Student Union for Peace Action-New Left Committee Fonds, Box 12, File, ‘SUPA Conference Material,’ Tony Hyde, with the assistance of Michael Rowan, “The Student Union for Peace Action: An Analysis,” undated. vi I am profoundly grateful for the members of my dissertation committee. Thank you to Ian Milligan and Heather MacDougall for enriching this dissertation with your questions and expertise. I appreciate the ways you have challenged me, and the time and attention you have given to my work. I could not have produced this dissertation without the outstanding instruction of my supervisor, Jim Walker. Thank you for encouraging me to trust my research inclinations as I delved deeper into the SUPA archives. Thank you also for the ways you have helped me develop my skills in research, writing, and teaching, through your advice, course instruction, and mentorship during my teaching practicum. It has been a true gift to learn from you. I am deeply grateful for your guidance throughout these six years. I would also like to thank Beverly Bayzat, Rick Stapleton, and Bridget Whittle of the McMaster Archives & Research Collections, and Véronique Paris of the Canadian Women’s Movement Archives for your assistance and kindness while locating research materials. I am also very thankful for the financial support provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Lastly, I would like to extend my deep gratitude to my amazing support network of teachers, family, and friends. Audra Diptee, thank you for encouraging me to pursue my doctoral studies. I am sincerely grateful for your belief in me. Thank you to my parents, Rob and Enza Campbell for always prioritizing my education and ambitions, and for your unfailing support of my academic pursuits. Thank you to Nonni, Vanessa, Logan, Kellie, Paul, Joshua, Brittany, and Gracelyn for your love and encouragement, and to Kate, Kathleen, Chantal, and Alyssa, for always cheering me on. Finally, to Joel Windle, thank you for being such a constant source of support. Your love, optimism, and words of encouragement are precious gifts. vii Table of Contents Examining Committee Membership ........................................................................................... ii Author’s Declaration ................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... vi Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... viii List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... xi Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 Historiography and Argument .............................................................................................2 SUPA, New Leftism, and the Sixties ...................................................................................6 Periodization ......................................................................................................................10 Defining Feminist Consciousness, Women’s Liberation, and Second-Wave Feminism ..13 Method and Sources ...........................................................................................................16 Chapter Outline ..................................................................................................................25 Chapter One: “LET OUR GENERATION LEAD”: New Leftists and the Canadian Combined Universities Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, 1959-1964 .............................28 New Leftists and Youth in Canadian Historiography ........................................................30
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "New World Order": Imperialist Barbarism
    SPARTACIST Bush, Mulroney' Gloat Over Desert Massacre "New World Order": Imperialist Barbarism Rebours/AP Charred remains of imperialist slaughter of Iraqi soldiers withdrawing from Kuwait. As planes repeatedly bombed "killing box" for over 12 hours, pilots boasted It was "like shooting fish in a barrel." U.S. imperialism's easy win in its one-sided, bloody war of armbands. Bush gloats that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein devastation against Iraq is a deadly danger to working people "walks amidst ruins," while a pumped-up officer in the field and the oppressed everywhere. trumpets Washington's messagc to "thc rest of the world": The flag-wavers came out in force, with military parades and "If the U.S. is going to deploy forces, watch out." yellow ribbons everywhere. The U.S. Congress staged a spec­ Washington's junior partners in Ottawa played their part tacle for the conquering commander in chief that rcsembled in raining death upon the people of Iraq. Now Joe Clark has something between a football pep rally and a Nazi beer haJJ been sent to tour the Near East, hoping to share the spotlight meeting. Democrats and Republicans alike repeatcdly rose to for helping with the slaughter, and sniffing around for a few ehant "Bush! Bush! Bush!" and wore American flags like (continued on page 12) 2 SPARTACIST/Canada Partisan Defense Committee Fund Appeal Defend Arrested British Spartacist! At a February 2 demonstration against the Gulf War in London Alastair Green, a comrade of the Spartacist League!Britain, was arrcsted, dragged off the march, hit in the face with a police helmet and then charged with "obstructing a police officer" and "threatening behaviour." The police action against our comrade was carried out expressly on the basis of the SL/B's political positions on the war-for the' defeat of U.S.!British imperialism and defense of Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Democratic Parly and Labor Political Action in Canada
    ^ •%0k--~* ^'i'^©fc: s $> LABOR RESEARCH REVIEW #22 The New Democratic Parly and Labor Political Action in Canada • Elaine Bernard Political humorist Barry Crimmins recently remarked that the Perot phenomenon in the last Presidential election showed the depressing state of U.S. politics. "Who would have thought/' shrugged Crimmins, "that the development of a third party would reduce political choice?" Many U.S. union progressives have envied their Canadian counterparts' success in building an enduring labor-based political party—the New Democratic Party (NDP). They look to Canada and the NDP as proof that labor and democratic socialist ideas can win a wide hearing and acceptance in North America. As U.S. activists learn about Canada's more progressive labor laws, the national system of universal publicly funded single-payer health care coverage, and the more generous and extensive entitlement programs, they naturally look to labor's political power and the role of the labor-supported New Democratic Party in winning many of these reforms and promoting progressive social change in Canada. Yet most activists in the U.S. know little about the 33-year history of the NDP, the struggles that took place within the Canadian labor movement over the party's creation, and the continuing evolution of • Elaine Bernard is the Executive Director of the Harvard Trade Union Program. Before moving to the U.S. in 1989, she was a longtime activist and the president of the British Columbia wing of the New Democratic Party of Canada. 100 Labor Research Review #21 the relationship between organized labor and the party.
    [Show full text]
  • Burn It Down! Anarchism, Activism, and the Vancouver Five, 1967–1985
    Burn it Down! Anarchism, Activism, and the Vancouver Five, 1967–1985 by Eryk Martin M.A., University of Victoria, 2008 B.A. (Hons.), University of Victoria, 2006 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Eryk Martin 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2016 Approval Name: Eryk Martin Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (History) Title: Burn it Down! Anarchism, Activism, and the Vancouver Five, 1967–1985 Examining Committee: Chair: Dimitris Krallis Associate Professor Mark Leier Senior Supervisor Professor Karen Ferguson Supervisor Professor Roxanne Panchasi Supervisor Associate Professor Lara Campbell Internal Examiner Professor Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Joan Sangster External Examiner Professor Gender and Women’s Studies Trent University Date Defended/Approved: January 15, 2016 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract This dissertation investigates the experiences of five Canadian anarchists commonly knoWn as the Vancouver Five, Who came together in the early 1980s to destroy a BC Hydro power station in Qualicum Beach, bomb a Toronto factory that Was building parts for American cruise missiles, and assist in the firebombing of pornography stores in Vancouver. It uses these events in order to analyze the development and transformation of anarchist activism between 1967 and 1985. Focusing closely on anarchist ideas, tactics, and political projects, it explores the resurgence of anarchism as a vibrant form of leftWing activism in the late tWentieth century. In addressing the ideological basis and contested cultural meanings of armed struggle, it uncovers Why and how the Vancouver Five transformed themselves into an underground, clandestine force.
    [Show full text]
  • Xs. JOHN LEWIS
    m if] OGRESSIVE WOMAN'S QUARTERL v . JOHN LEWIS: xs IOLE 74A70 78532 3 The world as women live it Her search for a legal abortion led The memoir of AM Norma McCorvey Sally Belfrage, to become the daughter of anonymous radical writers ROE plaintiff in the Cedric Belfrage landmark Supreme MY LIFE, and Molly Castle, ROE V. WADE, Court decision. who yearned to be AND This book is her an "all-American FREEDOM personal story, o r girl" during her CHOICE "a direct, unsenti- McCarthy-era mental, and often adolescence in the harsh account of NORMA McCORVEY conformist 50s. WITH ANDY MEJSl.Eft a real life at the "Wry and heart of historical poignant." events." SALLY BUFRABE —Publishers — Publishers Weekly Weekly BALKAN "Through short but deeply "A bold and original felt essays on everything exploration of female "With simplicity, and honesty, from housepaint and high- inventiveness and courage." Bloodlines movingly describes heeled shoes to point-blank — Harriet G. Lerner, Hales evolution and ultimate murder, Drakulic tells the author of The Dance of Anger liberation. Powerful and story of the Balkan crisis as poignant." people are living it." "Buoyant and instructive... — The Nation a welcome counterweight to — Chief Wilma Mankiller the pressures society still "Moving and eloquent." "Mesmerizing." exerts on women who want —New York Times — New York Times a life of their own." Book Review With four new chapters — New Woman Winner of the $11.00 paperback $12.00 paperback American Book Award $11.00 paperback pzs^m Also available from HzrperCollinsCanadaLtd.
    [Show full text]
  • LEAF Edmonton E-Notes 2015 January
    Page 1 of 4 LEAF EDMONTON E-NOTES January 2015 2015: the 30th anniversary of s. 15 of the Charter and of LEAF! The 1981 conference of the Ad Hoc Jenny Margetts, speaking at the 1981 Committee of Canadian Women and the conference Constitution (Images from Constitute!, with permission from the International Women’s Rights Project.) April 2015 brings the 30th anniversary of s. 15 of the Charter and of the founding of LEAF. Section 15 of the Charter came into effect on April 17, 1985 – three years after the Canadian Constitution and its Charter of Rights and Freedoms were enacted. Section 15 was put on hold for a three year time frame to allow federal and provincial governments to review their legislation and change any discriminatory laws. Two days later, on April 19, 1985, LEAF was founded under the leadership of women like Doris Anderson. Each of the founding mothers of LEAF had played a crucial role in ensuring women’s rights were a central component of the Charter and in Canada’s history. Plans are underway in LEAF Edmonton and by LEAF nationally for events and information outreach to celebrate these anniversaries. Page 2 of 4 Further information on the history of LEAF can be accessed at http://www.leaf.ca/about- leaf/history/. The story of women’s activism in 1981 that led to the strengthening of equality provisions in the Charter is told in the video Constitute! (see photos, above), which can be accessed at http://constitute.ca/the-film/. Further information on the Ad Hoc Committee on Women and the Constitution and the history of sections 15 and 28 of the Charter is also available as follows (although the article was written in 2001 and refers to the 20th anniversary of the 1981 conference): http://section15.ca/features/news/2001/02/06/womens_constitution_conference/ In recognition of the 30th anniversary of s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morning After the Federal Elections In
    Keghart The Morning After the Federal Elections in Canada Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/the-morning-after-the-federal-elections-in-canada/ and Democracy THE MORNING AFTER THE FEDERAL ELECTIONS IN CANADA Posted on May 4, 2011 by Keghart Category: Opinions Page: 1 Keghart The Morning After the Federal Elections in Canada Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/the-morning-after-the-federal-elections-in-canada/ and Democracy Judy Rebick, Transforming Power, 3 May 2011 It was an extraordinary election. Both Stephen Harper and Jack Layton got the results they were aiming for. Stephen Harper got his majority and Jack Layton replaced the Liberal Party not only as the Official Opposition but quite possibly as the only federal alternatives to the Harperites. Canada now looks like so many other countries with one party on the Right and one on the Left. So why do I feel so bad? Judy Rebick, Transforming Power, 3 May 2011 It was an extraordinary election. Both Stephen Harper and Jack Layton got the results they were aiming for. Stephen Harper got his majority and Jack Layton replaced the Liberal Party not only as the Official Opposition but quite possibly as the only federal alternatives to the Harperites. Canada now looks like so many other countries with one party on the Right and one on the Left. So why do I feel so bad? Firstly, a government that has shown its contempt of democracy in a myriad of ways, not the least lying to Parliament about its spending, won a majority of seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Favorability – USA 2000
    Catching the Big Wave: Public Opinion Polls and Bandwagons in US and Canadian Elections Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Delton T. Daigle, M.A. Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Herbert Weisberg, Advisor Professor Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier Professor Paul Allen Beck Professor Randall B. Ripley i Copyright by Delton T. Daigle 2010 i Abstract For as long as public opinions have generally thought to be known there have been claims made that knowledge of where people stand can impact both the attitudes and behaviors of others. Previous research has had mixed results in identifying and measuring the effects of ―bandwagons‖. This research uses better data and derives tests from contemporary theories of public opinion to show that not only do bandwagons definitively exist, but also that they exist most often among the groups of people we would expect to be influenced by ambient information: those adequately prepared to receive a message but not so sophisticated as to not be influenced by it. This research examines and finds bandwagon effects in four elections total in two different countries (Canada in 2004 and 2006 and the United States in 2000 and 2004) and as such, contributes to the larger scientific endeavor of generalization through comparison. ii Dedication For my patient and loving wife Carolina iii Acknowledgements It only seems natural to begin acknowledgements with recognizing my advisor Herb Weisberg and my committee Jan Box-Steffensmeier, Randall Ripley and Paul Beck, whose patience with how long it took me to defend this project cannot be appreciated more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Friend Vol
    The Canadian Friend Vol. 104, No. 2 May 2008 IN THIS ISSUE Get Thee to Camp NeeKauNis Protest and Truth Telling Around the Family The Canadian Friend May 2008 Volume 104, Number 2 The Canadian Friend (ISSN 0382-7658) is the Editorial: magazine of Canadian Yearly Meeting, and is published five times a year on its behalf by the Home Mission and Advancement Committee. The Raised by a Conscientious Objector who spent the ‘50s Canadian Friend is sent to all members of Canadian in the southern States struggling along with Blacks for civil Yearly Meeting and to regular attenders. It is funded rights, I learned early about protest and truth telling. All through quotas and free-will donations of the membership to further the work and witness of the risked their lives with the Ku Klux Klan every day. For some, Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Canada. the only protest available was running away. I remember * Articles, Poetry, Photos and Drawings visiting a family of sharecroppers who had no alternative to Submissions are always welcome, and need not enslavement to their landowner than to escape in the night to share the theme of the issue. Send to: Birmingham, to live in hiding, fearing for their safety. Sherryll Harris E-mail: [email protected] 1829 Fern St. Through the ‘60s I spent holidays, and later as a young Victoria, B.C. Canada, V8R-4K4 adult I lived with a family friend many readers knew - Mildred Telephone: 250-370-0190 Fahrni. She was invariably off to an embassy or somewhere * Advertising conspicuous with placards to protest war and injustice or Send camera-ready or clear, readable copy to the advocate for war resisters.
    [Show full text]
  • Branching Out: Second-Wave Feminist Periodicals and the Archive of Canadian Women’S Writing Tessa Jordan University of Alberta
    Branching Out: Second-Wave Feminist Periodicals and the Archive of Canadian Women’s Writing Tessa Jordan University of Alberta Look, I push feminist articles as much as I can ... I’ve got a certain kind of magazine. It’s not Ms. It’s not Branching Out. It’s not Status of Women News. Doris Anderson Rough Layout hen Edmonton-based Branching Out: Canadian Magazine for WWomen (1973 to 1980) began its thirty-one-issue, seven-year history, Doris Anderson was the most prominent figure in women’s magazine publishing in Canada. Indeed, her work as a journalist, editor, novelist, and women’s rights activist made Anderson one of the most well-known faces of the Canadian women’s movement. She chaired the Canadian Advisory Coun- cil on the Status of Women from 1979 to 1981 and was the president of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women from 1982 to 1984, but she is best known as the long-time editor of Chatelaine, Can- ada’s longest lived mainstream women’s magazine, which celebrated its eightieth anniversary in 2008. As Chatelaine’s editor from 1957 to 1977, she was at the forefront of the Canadian women’s movement, publishing articles and editorials on a wide range of feminist issues, including legal- izing abortion, birth control, divorce laws, violence against women, and ESC 36.2–3 (June/September 2010): 63–90 women in politics. When Anderson passed away in 2007, then Governor- General Adrienne Clarkson declared that “Doris was terribly important as a second-wave feminist because she had the magazine for women and Tessa Jordan (ba it was always thoughtful and always had interesting things in it” (quoted Victoria, ma Alberta) in Martin).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    .. Introduction he news on Saturday, August 22, 2009, that Muriel Duckworth had Tdied in her one hundred and first year set wires buzzing across Canada. People wanted to talk about their experience of her. Some gave interviews to the media; others came together or phoned each other. In the weeks following, memorial services were held at Austin, Quebec, Halifax, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto and Vancouver. All of us recognized that her passing marked the end of an era, but I sense that we came together not only to remember her but to testify to Muriel’s ongoing legacy of love. In 1996 I was delighted when Fernwood published the biography of Muriel that I had written. Muriel Duckworth: A Very Active Pacifist was inspired by my devotion to her. I’d had the opportunity to be close to her for twenty years in Halifax. Muriel caused a significant change in my life, as I am sure she did for many, when in 1978 she introduced me to the peace movement through the Voice of Women, a national peace organization. Muriel became my role model in countless ways. She reinforced the best of my social work education as I watched her practise adult education in both small informal groups and the large organizations she helped to found. Her warm relationships with everyone were at once spontaneous yet carefully tended. Her behaviour was rooted in her principles, and her love for so many individuals reflected her love for humanity. She combined gentleness, tenacity, humour and fearlessness. Muriel became the mother I had never known since my own mother died when I was a young child.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Letter Your New Executive Is Well Into Its Work for the Coming
    RECEIVED JUN 20 1983 NATIONAL ACTION COMMITTEE on the status of women .LE COMITE NATIONAL D'AGTION sur le statut de la MEMO femme Suite 306 40 av. St.Clair est 40 St. Clair Ave. FToronto M4T 1 M9 (416) 922,3246 June, 1983 ISSN: 0712-3183 SUB: $6.00 President’s Letter Your new Executive is well into its work for the coming year, with the committees and their plans under way. We have already appeared before the Parliamentary Task Force on Pension Reform and had discussions with Donal Macdonald and some of the members of his Commission in a preliminary meeting. We’ve also had a meeting with Marc Lalonde, Minister of Finance, Judy Erola, Minister Responsible for the Status of Women, and some of the people from Monique Begin’s department of Health and Welfare, to discuss our study on Funding of Social Services for women. Over the summer, we will be working on several briefs and papers in preparation for the fall, and our Committees’ work plans are outline in this MEMO. We urge you to write us with any suggestions or input from either yourself or your group. Cheers Doris Anderson member p ~e. w~m~ the foU.omb~ ne~ me.~be~ grou~ Fredsci.e¢o~ ~/omen ' ~ C~, FredccLct:on, N. 8. K, Ltd~-~aZe,'rZoo WCA, r,~Zeke~er, O~ Oruta,~a t~u~ A~,sa~n, To~o, Or~ So~ap~t I~u~a~ o4 Reg~a, Reg., $~ehe~ ~/e~t Koote~u,j' (Uom~' ~ ~,~o~o~, ~le2.~on, B.C. WINS Tr=u,~,c~:ioa Hou,6e, T~Jl, 8.C.
    [Show full text]