Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas (2012) 6, 7–11

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmhi

REGULAR ARTICLES The human : A novel substitute for reconstruction of the extrahepatic

Yao Cheng 1, Yixin Lin 1, Xianze Xiong, Sijia Wu, Jiong Lu, Nansheng Cheng *

Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Received 9 January 2012; revised 10 February 2012; accepted 28 February 2012

Abstract Reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct following bile duct injury or defect is one of the most common challenges for hepatobiliary surgeons. There are currently a number of surgical strategies such as biliary-enteric anastomosis, end-to-end anastomosis and autologous tissue substi- tute. However, dysfunction as well as biliary stricture may occur after surgical anastomosis. Also, insufficient tissue quantity remains a problem associated with the application of tissue substitute. Therefore, considerable attention has been attracted to explore a new replace- ment material of the bile duct for biliary reconstruction. The human umbilical cord (HUC) is abun- dant in resource and is convenient to collect, including two arteries and one vein, whose diameters are close to that of the . In order to reduce immunogenicity (foreign-body reac- tion), cells and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens can be removed from the HUC and the remaining tissue (extracellular matrix, ECM) can be used as a scaffold. The HUC provides a rich source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). A current study has demonstrated that MSCs are able to differentiate into biliary epithelial cells in vivo and in vitro with low immunogenicity, which can be used as seed cells. The HUC might be a promising composite material of a scaffold (ECM) and seed cells (biliary epithelial cells), for bile duct replacement in situ without removal of sphincter of Oddi, or biliary stricture. In addition, the patients’ own umbilical cord without any foreign-body reaction can be directly banked for possible future use in bile duct reconstruction. Therefore, we hypothesise that the HUC may be a novel substitute for reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct. ª 2012 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.

* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Road, Chengdu 610041, China. Tel./fax: +86 28 85422465. E-mail address: [email protected] (N. Cheng). 1 They contributed equally to the submission.

2251-7294 ª 2012 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. URL: www.tums.ac.ir/english/ doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmhi.2012.03.001 8 Y. Cheng et al.

Introduction [25]. HUC, with such a composition of bio-scaffolds, living cells and growth factors, might be a promising material for restoration of the function of bile duct. Bile duct, as a conduit for bile flow, has a poor intrinsic healing 2. Autologous substitute: The patient’s own umbilical cord, capacity [1,2]. Once bile duct has been affected by carcinoma, which was banked after birth for future use, could be cyst, stricture or atresia, most patients require resection of the applied to directly reconstruct the patient’s own bile duct. affected segment, if applicable, resulting in iatrogenic bile duct Some autologous tissues (e.g., vein, ileum and ) defect [3]. Iatrogenic bile duct injury occurs more frequently in have been suggested as substitutes for biliary reconstruc- the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The overall incidence tion. Similarly, we hypothesise that the autologous HUC of biliary lesion following laparoscopic cholecystectomy varies may also be used to reconstruct the bile duct. The autolo- between 0.3% and 0.7% in different series [4–7]. Reconstruc- gous HUC offers the following advantages: First, the tion of the extrahepatic bile duct is often performed on the pa- HUC-MSCs might differentiate into biliary epithelial cells tients suffering from the bile duct injury or defect [8,9]. in vivo after transplantation, which might promote the bile Biliary-enteric anastomosis (anastomosis between bile duct duct regeneration (see below). Second, reconstruction of the and small intestine) is regarded as the ‘golden standard’ tech- extrahepatic bile duct can be achieved without any immu- nique for reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct [8,9]. nologic graft rejection. However, this operation alters the normal biliary anatomy and removes the sphincter of Oddi function, which may lead Both allogenic substitute and autologous substitute can be to the reflux of pancreatic juice and bacteria from the intestine used to reconstruct the extrahepatic bile duct in situ without into the biliary tree [8–10]. Biliary-enteric anastomosis has long altering the normal biliary anatomy. This operation does pre- been associated with some severe complications (e.g., cholangi- serve the sphincter of Oddi function. Furthermore, the HUC is tis, anastomotic stricture, intra-hepatic stone and biliary long enough to reconstruct the extrahepatic bile duct more cirrhosis) and an increased risk for cholangiocarcinoma than once, if necessary (e.g., in case of postoperative anasto- [8–10]. Therefore, the best way to treat bile duct injury or de- motic stricture). fect is to preserve the sphincter of Oddi function and recon- struct the bile duct in situ without altering the normal biliary anatomy. However, on account of the present lack of viable Evaluation of the hypothesis replacement materials with the capacity of growth and regen- eration, a sphincter of Oddi-preserving biliary reconstruction The feasibility of this hypothesis is based on the following five remains a challenge for hepatobiliary surgeons [8,9]. Identify- facts: ing an ideal material that can promote bile duct regeneration has been an active area of research [8–14]. 1. Scaffolds: The diameters of umbilical vessel and common Recently, the human umbilical cord (HUC) has been bile duct are similar. Mature HUC attains an average diam- broadly studied in tissue engineering. Current studies have sug- eter of 1.7 cm and a length of 50–60 cm [26,27]. The diam- gested that the HUC has the potential to be used as a substi- eter of umbilical artery varies between 3 and 4 cm, and the tute for vessel [15–18], , tendon [19] and bone diameter of ranges from 6 to 8 cm [26,27]. [20,21]. Furthermore, the use of autologous umbilical vein The normal common bile duct has a diameter of 6 mm or patch from ligamentum teres hepatis (round ligament of ) less, with a range of 4–8 mm in adults [28,29]. After choos- for reconstruction of the injured bile duct has been reported in ing the umbilical vessels with the appropriate diameter, cells two small clinical trials [22,23]. Therefore, it may be feasible and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens can that the HUC may be used as a substitute for reconstruction be removed to reduce immunogenicity. The decellularisa- of the extrahepatic bile duct. tion process can be performed via various methods (e.g., chemical treatments and enzymatic treatments) [30]. The Hypothesis remaining tissue consists of mainly extracellular matrix (ECM). Consequently, tubular scaffold with appropriate We hypothesise that the HUC may be an effective novel sub- diameter and low immunogenicity can be generated from stitute for reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct. Our the primary HUC. Moreover, the scaffold is biodegradable hypothesis can be summarised as follows: and can provide a suitable environment for the growth and proliferation of stem cells [31]. 1. Allogenic substitute: An HUC, as a tissue-engineered prod- 2. Seed cells: The HCU, especially the part of Wharton’s jelly uct for reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct, is and HUC vein, is an abundant resource of mesenchymal donated from one person and transplanted into another per- stem cells (HUC-MSCs) [32,33]. It is generally accepted son. A key in the revolutionary field of tissue engineering is that HUC-MSCs are poorly immunogenic with multilin- the development of the suitable scaffolds for seeding cells, eage differentiation potential [32,33]. Recently, growth factors and subsequent growth of tissues. It is well HUC-MSCs have successfully differentiated into osteocytes established that the HUC is rich in conduits (vessels), con- [21], [24], etc. We have proposed the possibility taining two arteries and one vein. Intriguingly, the HUC of application of bone marrow-derived MSCs in bile leak has been demonstrated to be a new source for mesenchymal [1]. Likewise, the ability of HUC-MSCs to differentiate into stem cells (HUC-MSCs) which can differentiate into multi- biliary epithelial cells can be postulated. ple lineage-specific cells that form bone, cartilage, liver, etc 3. Growth factors: Growth factors are responsible for prolif- [21,24]. Furthermore, the Wharton’s jelly that surrounds eration and differentiation of cells. For example, epidermal the human umbilical vein (HUV) is rich in growth factors growth factor (EGF) exerts a wide variety of biological The human umbilical cord: A novel substitute 9

effects, including the promotion of proliferation and differ- Discussion entiation of MSCs [34,35]; transforming growth factor beta (TGF-b) plays important roles in cellular differentiation, Our strategies of making allogenic substitutes and autologous hormone secretion and immune function [34,36]. Fibroblast substitutes are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. Vascularisation (blood growth factor (FGF), EGF and TGF-b have been detected supply) is a key factor to warrant the long-term viability of the in the extracts of Wharton’s jelly [25]. graft [38]. Various methods have been suggested: incorpora- 4. Animal experiments and clinical trials: An animal experi- tion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the scaf- ment has demonstrated the reconstruction of the extrahe- fold for slow release; co-cultivation of target tissue cells, patic bile duct in dogs by using human amniotic endothelial cells and angiogenesis signalling cells; and decellu- membrane [14]. As described above, autologous umbilical larisation of the whole organ and its blood vessels [38]. In addi- vein patch form ligamentum tere hepatis could be used to tion, wrapping the graft in vascularised great omentum may reconstruct the injured bile duct [22,23]. support the survival of the graft [14]. 5. Sources: The HUC is abundant in resource without ethical issues. It is usually discarded after delivery. Collecting the HUC after birth does not carry any risk to the mother or Conclusion newborn. Furthermore, some investigators have suggested the importance of banking the whole umbilical cord unit We hypothesise that the HUC may be a novel substitute for for research or future therapeutic use [37]. reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct. Continued

Figure. 1 Strategy of making allogenic substitute. ECM: extracellular matrix; MSCs: mesenchymal stem cells. 10 Y. Cheng et al.

References

[1] Lin Y, Yan L, Cheng N. Application of bone marrow cells: a novel therapy for bile leak? Med Hypotheses 2009;73(3): 374–6. [2] Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okada K, Toshimitsu Y, Torii T, Otani Y, Koyama I, Ikada Y. Regeneration of extrahepatic bile duct–possibility to clinical application by recognition of the regenerative process. J Smooth Muscle Res 2007;43(6):211–8. [3] Blumgart LH. Hilar and intrahepatic biliary enteric anastomosis. Surg Clin North Am 1994;74(4):845–63. [4] Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006;93(2):158–68. [5] Giger U, Ouaissi M, Schmitz SF, Kra¨henbu¨hl S, Kra¨henbu¨hl L. Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2011;98:391–6. [6] Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D’Acapito F, Vellone M, Murazio M, Capelli G. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 2005;140(10): 986–92. Figure. 2 Strategy of making autologous substitute. [7] Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, research to establish the ideal HUC scaffold and confirm its Wara P. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184(6): safety and feasibility in animal models will help realise the po- 571–8. tential clinical applications of this promising new therapeutic [8] Nau P, Liu J, Ellison EC, Hazey JW, Henn M, Muscarella P, strategy. Additionally, HUC bank would facilitate the future Narula VK, Melvin WS. Novel reconstruction of the extrahe- use of HUC for reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct. patic biliary tree with a biosynthetic absorbable graft. HPB 2011;13(8):573–8. Conflict of interest statement [9] Miyazawa M, Torii T, Toshimitsu Y, Okada K, Koyama I, Ikada Y. A tissue-engineered artificial bile duct grown to resemble the native bile duct. Am J Transplant 2005;5(6):1541–7. None declared. [10] Christensen M, Laursen HB, Rokkjaer M, Jensen PF, Yasuda Y, Mortensen FV. Reconstruction of the common bile duct by a vascular prosthetic graft: an experimental study in pigs. J Overview Box Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005;12(3):231–4. [11] Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okamoto K, Toshimitsu Y, Torii T, First question: What do we already know about the Okada K, Akimoto N, Ohtani Y, Koyama I, Yoshito I. A novel subject? treatment for bile duct injury with a tissue-engineered Reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct following bioabsorbable polymer patch. Surgery 2010;147(4):575–80. [12] Rosen M, Ponsky J, Petras R, Fanning A, Brody F, Duperier F. bile duct injury or defect is difficult for surgeons. Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for regeneration. Surgery 2002;132(3):480–6. Second question: What does your proposed theory add to [13] Go´mez NA, Alvarez LR, Mite A, Andrade JP, Alvarez JR, the current knowledge available, and what benefits does it Vargas PE, Tomala´NE, Vivas AF, Zapatier JA. Repair of bile have? duct injuries with Gore-Tex vascular grafts: experimental study The HUC might be a promising substitute for recon- in dogs. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6(1):116–20. struction of bile duct in situ without removal of sphincter [14] Ismail A, Ramsis R, Sherif A, Thabet A, El-Ghor H, Selim A. of Oddi, or biliary stricture. This hypothesis provides a Use of human amniotic stem cells for common bile duct new strategy for bile duct reconstruction. reconstruction: vascularized support of a free amnion graft. Med Sci Monit 2009;15(9):RB243–7. [15] Gui L, Muto A, Chan S, Breuer C, Niklason LE. Development Third question: Among numerous available studies, what of decellularized human umbilical arteries as small-diameter special further study do you propose for testing the idea? vascular grafts. Tissue Eng Part A 2009;15(9):2665–76. Continued research to establish the ideal HUC scaf- [16] Li WC, Zhang HM, Wang PJ, Xi GM, Wang HQ, Chen Y, fold and confirm its safety and feasibility in animal mod- Deng ZH, Zhang ZH, Huang TZ. Quantitative analysis of the els will help realise the potential clinical applications of microstructure of human umbilical vein for assessing feasibility this promising new therapeutic strategy. as vessel substitute. Ann Vasc Surg 2008;22(3):417–24. [17] Kerdjoudj H, Berthelemy N, Rinckenbach S, Kearney-Schwartz A, Montagne K, Schaaf P, Lacolley P, Stoltz JF, Voegel JC, Menu P. Small vessel replacement by human umbilical arteries with polyelectrolyte film-treated arteries: in vivo behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(19):1589–97. Acknowledgement [18] Hoenicka M, Lehle K, Jacobs VR, Schmid FX, Birnbaum DE. Properties of the human umbilical vein as a living This study was supported by National Natural Science scaffold for a tissue-engineered vessel graft. Tissue Eng Foundation of China (Grant No. 30772124). 2007;13(1):219–29. The human umbilical cord: A novel substitute 11

[19] Abousleiman RI, Reyes Y, McFetridge P, Sikavitsas V. The [29] Bachar GN, Cohen M, Belenky A, Atar E, Gideon S. Effect of human umbilical vein: a novel scaffold for musculoskeletal soft aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct: a sonographic study. J tissue regeneration. Artif Organs 2008;32(9):735–42. Ultrasound Med 2003;22(9):879–82. [20] Zhao L, Weir MD, Xu HH. Human umbilical cord stem cell [30] Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of encapsulation in calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone engi- tissues and organs. Biomaterials 2006;27(19):3675–83. neering. Biomaterials 2010;31(14):3848–57. [31] Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW. Extracellular matrix as a [21] Diao Y, Ma Q, Cui F, Zhong Y. Human umbilical cord biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta mesenchymal stem cells: osteogenesis in vivo as seed cells for Biomater 2009;5(1):1–13. bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;91(1): [32] Zeddou M, Briquet A, Relic B, Josse C, Malaise MG, Gothot A, 123–31. Lechanteur C, Beguin Y. The umbilical cord matrix is a better [22] Watanabe M, Yamazaki K, Tsuchiya M, Otsuka Y, Tamura A, source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) than the umbilical cord Shimokawa K, Kaneko H, Teramoto T. Use of an opened blood. Cell Biol Int 2010;34(7):693–701. umbilical vein patch for the reconstruction of the injured biliary [33] Cai J, Li W, Su H, Qin D, Yang J, Zhu F, Xu J, He W, Guo X, tract. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14(3):270–5. Labuda K, Peterbauer A, Wolbank S, Zhong M, Li Z, Wu W, [23] Kimura Y, Hirata K, Mukaiya M, Mizuguchi T, Nobuoka T, So KF, Redl H, Zeng L, Esteban MA, Pei D. Generation of Furuhata T, Katsuramaki T. Biliary injury after laparoscopic human induced pluripotent stem cells from umbilical cord cholecystectomy: end-to-end anastomosis covered with umbilical matrix and amniotic membrane mesenchymal cells. J Biol Chem vein. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005;12(3): 269–71. 2010;285(15):11227–34. [24] Campard D, Lysy PA, Najimi M, Sokal EM. Native umbilical [34] Sporn MB, Roberts AB. Peptide growth factors are multi- cord matrix stem cells express hepatic markers and differen- functional. Nature 1988;332(6161):217–9. tiate into -like cells. Gastroenterology 2008;134(3): [35] PubMed. MeSH: epidermal growth factor. [accessed [25] Sobolewski K, Makowski A, Ban´kowski E, Jaworski S. 08.01.12]. Wharton’s jelly as a reservoir of peptide growth factors. [36] PubMed. MeSH: transforming growth factor beta. [accessed 08.01.12]. morphologic assessment of the umbilical cord: a review Part I. [37] Secco M, Moreira YB, Zucconi E, Vieira NM, Jazedje T, Muotri Obstet Gynecol Surv 1997;52(8):506–14. AR, Okamoto OK, Verjovski-Almeida S, Zatz M. Gene [27] Weissman A, Jakobi P, Bronshtein M, Goldstein I. Sonographic expression profile of mesenchymal stem cells from paired measurements of the umbilical cord and vessels during normal umbilical cord units: cord is different from blood. Stem Cell pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13(1):11–4. Rev 2009;5(4):387–401. [28] Wu CC, Ho YH, Chen CY. Effect of aging on common bile duct [38] Kaully T, Kaufman-Francis K, Lesman A, Levenberg S. diameter: a real-time ultrasonographic study. J Clin Ultrasound Vascularization–the conduit to viable engineered tissues. 1984;12(8):473–8. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2009;15(2):159–69.