DOCSLIB.ORG

Recall to Life: Imperial Britain, Foreign Refugees and the Development of Modern Refuge, 1789-1905

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recall to Life: Imperial Britain, Foreign Refugees and the Development of Modern Refuge, 1789-1905 Recall to Life: Imperial Britain, Foreign Refugees and the Development of Modern Refuge, 1789-1905 By Caroline Emily Shaw A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Thomas W. Laqueur, Chair Professor James Vernon Professor Catherine Gallagher Professor David Lieberman Spring 2010 Recall to Life: Imperial Britain, Foreign Refugees and the Development of Modern Refuge, 1789-1905 © 2010 By Caroline Emily Shaw ABSTRACT Recall to Life: Imperial Britain, Foreign Refugees and the Development of Modern Refuge, 1789-1905 by Caroline Emily Shaw Doctor of Philosophy in History The University of California, Berkeley Professor Thomas W. Laqueur, Chair The dissertation that follows offers the first historical examination of the nineteenth-century origins of the “refugee” as a modern humanitarian and legal category. To date, scholars have tended to focus on a single refugee group or have overlooked this period entirely, acknowledging the linguistic origins of the term “refugee” with the seventeenth-century French Huguenots before skipping directly to the post-WWI period. I find that it is only through the imperial and global history of British refuge in the nineteenth century that we can understand the sources of our contemporary moral commitment to refugees. Through most of the eighteenth century, “refugees” were understood to be Protestants fleeing persecution on the Continent. The refugee category expanded during the French Revolution and the decades that followed, as British philanthropists, officials and civil servants defined their nation in contrast to oppressive governance across the globe. By the mid-nineteenth century, “the refugee,” although nowhere defined in British law, was recognized from the political fringes to the heights of the imperial government as a foreigner who had been persecuted overseas and hence required special philanthropic attention. The British media and a broad contingent of supporters from all social classes celebrated refuge as a national moral imperative. They applied the category to any foreigner who fit the now standardized refugee characteristics regardless of his or her religion, race, or politics. This high moral aspiration encountered two distinct difficulties in the years after 1870, however. First, while the British routinely assumed that they were more liberal than other powers, imperial rule bred pockets of resistance and created its own political refugees. This raised troubling questions of ethical consistency, as British politicians and philanthropists themselves recognized. Second, Britain’s ability to harbor foreign refugees depended on its imperial reach. The increasingly obvious limits to Britain’s international power after 1870 made it more difficult to resettle refugees throughout the Empire or to persuade foreign powers to protect refugees at Britain’s behest. Ironically, these limitations also drove British philanthropists and officials to pursue refugee relief on an increasingly international basis, the legacies of which remain with us today. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii INTRODUCTION: Persecuted Foreigners and the Place of Modern Refuge 1 SECTION I. FROM A CONFESSIONAL MODEL TO A LIBERAL MODEL FOR REFUGE, 1685-1870 CHAPTER ONE: Emigrés, Aliens and the Logics of Refuge, 1792-1793 13 CHAPTER TWO: Refugee Stories: The Emergence of a ‘Refugee’ Narrative, 1815-1870 39 CHAPTER THREE: Pragmatics and Politics and Refugee Relief, 1815-1870 64 CHAPTER FOUR: Governing Morals? Refuge at home and in the Empire, 1848-1861 90 SECTION II. A UNIVERSAL RIGHT? DEBATES OVER THE LIMITS OF BRITISH REFUGE, 1870-1900 CHAPTER FIVE: Criminal or Political? Foreign Refugees, Irish Fenians and International Extradition Law, 1870-1900 120 CHAPTER SIX: British Liberty & Sovereign Rights: The Fugitive Slave Circulars and Refuge in East Africa, 1875-76 153 SECTION III. THE ENDS OF BRITISH REFUGE, 1880-1905 Chapter Seven: Humanitarian Dreams, Domestic Nightmares: Persecution, Resettlement and the Re-working of British Refuge, 1880-1905 177 Conclusion: The Strictures of Hospitality: Universal Rights and the Peculiarities of British Refuge 209 BIBLIOGRAPHY 222 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Better not to mention the subject, anywhere or in any way, and to remove him – for a while at all events – out of France. Even I, safe as an Englishman, […] avoid all naming of the matter. I carry about me, not a scrap of writing openly referring to it. This is a secret service altogether. My credentials, and memoranda, are all comprehended in the one line, ‘Recalled to Life;’ which may mean anything. ~ Jarvis Lorry in Charles Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities I arrived in London in early July of 2005, eager to use my two months in the archives to settle on a dissertation topic while away from coursework. Interested in the history of international news, I agonized for three weeks over different potential topics, peppering my wonderful advisor James with emails about the latest topic of interest and catching up with Tom over tea at the British Library. I’d return to my room at the appropriately named Goodenough College each night to collapse from the day’s work. A Tale of Two Cities was my solace. Little did I realize when I selected a copy of the novel from Moe Books in Berkeley how appropriate this choice would be. It took almost a month before I realized that refuge was my topic. In the four years since that summer I’ve realized how unlike Jarvis Lorry British refugee supporters were in the long century between the French Revolution of 1789 and the Great War in 1914. British refuge was hardly a “secret service.” The effort to rescue foreign refugees from persecution overseas was a noisy, nation-defining affair. Refugee supporters – private philanthropists and public officials – relied on mass protest meetings and media coverage. To “recall” foreign refugees “to life” was a popular moral imperative, one Dickens himself shared. This dissertation would not have been possible without the support, guidance and criticism of my advisers in the History Department at UC Berkeley, James Vernon and Thomas Laqueur. They, along with Catherine Gallagher in the English Department and David Lieberman in History and Jurisprudence and Social Policy, form the best dissertation committee I could imagine. They have waded through memos from the archives and drafts of chapters with patience, encouragement and thoughtful advice. Barbara Hayashida, Mabel Lee, and Candace Groskreutz provided invaluable guidance and moral support in navigating Berkeley officialdom and the merry-go-round of fellowship applications, conferences and job applications that marks graduate student life. I do not know if I would have ended up in British history, or history at all, if it had not been for the inspiration of mentors. From my freshman year through my senior thesis at Johns Hopkins, David Bell encouraged me to seek out new academic challenges. Judith Walkowitz, whom I had the fortune to work with from early in my Hopkins years, taught me how to research in the archives and imparted to me a love for cultural history and for bringing novels and newspapers into the study of the past. Encouraged to delve deep into the archives at Hopkins, I found myself pulled in the opposite direction at Berkeley, prompted at every turn to think broadly and deeply about historical change by friends, professors and visiting scholars. I cannot imagine my years at Berkeley without Susanna Barrows and Tyler Stovall’s urging me to think comparatively. Susanna’s ability to make even studying for exams a social activity is without ii parallel. She reminded me, even at the most stressful of times in a graduate student’s studies, that the point and the pleasure of academic life is sharing and debating ideas. In the summer of 2005 and in 2006-2007, I conducted the archival work for my dissertation in London, Newcastle, and Southampton with the generous financial support of the University of California, Berkeley History Department, the UC Berkeley Institute of International Studies Simpson Fellowship, and the UC Berkeley Center for European Studies. I am indebted to the many archivists who helped me to access rare books and manuscripts at the British Library, the British National Archives, Bishopsgate Institute, the London Metropolitan Archives, newspapers at the British Library at Colindale, and the special collections at the Friends’ House, the British Red Cross, University College, London, the London School of Economics, Rhodes House, Oxford, and the University of Southampton. Joan Allen’s hospitality and knowledge of the Joseph Cowen Collection at the Tyne & Wear Archives Service in Newcastle salvaged an otherwise disastrous research trip in which my computer died upon arrival. My friends in London, old and new, helped stave off the isolation of the archives. Since returning to Berkeley from the archives, this project has benefited immensely from the Center for British Studies’ events and reading groups, from discussions during efforts to establish a human rights minor across the Berkeley campus, and from Berkeley-Chicago-Yale British Studies Mellon Consortia’s meetings and workshops, especially from the close readings and thoughtful questions of Jordanna Bailkin and fellow graduate students Desmond Fitzgibbon, Jeff Hoppes, Penelope Ismay, Andrew Keating, and Nicholas Wilson, and Darcy Hughes Heuring at Northwestern. David Feldman, Margot Finn and Peter Gatrell, and Carla Hesse, experts in matters relating to different refugee groups in the eighteenth through twentieth centuries, have each helped me to contextualize my study at key moments. Finally I have learned much from the commentary of participants at the American Historical Associations Annual Meeting, the Pacific Coast and the North American Conferences on British Studies, and the Refugees and the End of Empire Conference at De Montfort University in Leicester, UK, among them James Epstein, Kevin Grant, Nicoletta Gullace, Stefan Manz, Maura O’Connor, Panikos Panayi, Claudena Skran, Michelle Tusan, Judith Walkowitz, and Aristide Zolberg.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The German and German-Swiss Element in South Carolina, 1732
    G3 * S^^^nSmni ^-i^MJ-^V-fef. -JL?- 1^.> Jik . mjfi m ' """ — tmn||^.' — A.B.FAUST BULLETIN of the The German and German-Swiss Element in South CaroKna 1732-1752 GILBERT P. VOIGT ^ Professor of Modern Languages in Newberry College ISSUED MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY No. 113 September, 1922 COLUMBIA, S. C. Second-Class Mail Matter Jligiti7f,d hy M/rm..;nft^ %)/ i / . 1 . I I F CONTENTS Introduction I Prefach; II Page German and German-Swiss Immigration Into South Caro- lina, 1732-1752 5 Side-Lights on Conditions in Certain German Settlements in Souht Carolina, 1734-51 21 Swiss Notes on South Carolina 44 Some Saxe-Gothan Settlers 56 Digitized by Microsoft® INTRODUCTION, Professor Gilbert P. Voigt, A. M., of the chair of Modern Languages at Newberry College, was a special student at this university in 1911-12. Among his subjects of research here and in Europe in the summer of 1912, was the German element in the peopling of South Carolina from 1732-52, based mainly upon and with numerous citations from original documents. Neither Bernheim, in his History of the Lutheran Church in the Carolinas, nor Faust in his German Element in the U. S., has laid due emphasis upon the social and economic life of these early German emigrants, and McCrady has barely touched upon the subject. Mr. A. S. Salley, in his valuable county history has mainly restricted himself to a story of the Germans and Swiss-Germans in Orangeburg, with some reference to Amelia and Saxe-Gotha townships. In these papers Professor Voigt has blazed the way for a complete investigation of this largely neglected and important phase of the history of South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • How British Colonizers Both Caused and Benefitted from the Irish Potato
    “To Hell or Connaught:” How British Colonizers Both Caused and Benefitted from the Irish Potato Famine The Irish potato famine is well-known for the suffering and death it inflicted upon the masses of Irish peasantry between 1845 and 1848. The famine is often remembered and mourned as the tragic but unavoidable result of natural circumstances, and the blight that swept through the potato crop year after year is attributed as the sole cause of starvation. This misrepresentation of the famine’s history ignores the role of the British colonizer state in establishing conditions in Ireland that led to famine and exacerbating the suffering of the Irish through neglect. This paper explores the role of the British colonial government in Ireland in causing and amplifying the negative impacts of the Irish potato famine. Lewis 2 “To Hell or Connaught:” How British Colonizers Both Caused and Benefitted from the Irish Potato Famine Ruby Lewis PSU Challenge History of Modern Europe April 15, 2021 The Irish potato famine is undeniably one of the greatest tragedies in Ireland’s turbulent and bloodstained history. One million people—roughly one-eighth of Ireland’s Lewis 3 population—perished of starvation between 1845 and 1848, and another two million were forced to flee the country in search of a safer life elsewhere.1 Those who remained piled into disease-ridden, overcrowded workhouses or scraped out a living on meager plots of land. Too frequently, the famine is portrayed by historians as the inevitable outcome of population increase and unfortunate natural circumstances. In reality, the Great Hunger was the result of British conquest and subsequent neglect.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 Winter 2017–18 3 Liberal History News Winter 2017–18
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 97 / Winter 2017–18 / £7.50 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y The Forbidden Ground Tony Little Gladstone and the Contagious Diseases Acts J. Graham Jones Lord Geraint of Ponterwyd Biography of Geraint Howells Susanne Stoddart Domesticity and the New Liberalism in the Edwardian press Douglas Oliver Liberals in local government 1967–2017 Meeting report Alistair J. Reid; Tudor Jones Liberalism Reviews of books by Michael Freeden amd Edward Fawcett Liberal Democrat History Group “David Laws has written what deserves to become the definitive account of the 2010–15 coalition government. It is also a cracking good read: fast-paced, insightful and a must for all those interested in British politics.” PADDY ASHDOWN COALITION DIARIES 2012–2015 BY DAVID LAWS Frank, acerbic, sometimes shocking and often funny, Coalition Diaries chronicles the historic Liberal Democrat–Conservative coalition government through the eyes of someone at the heart of the action. It offers extraordinary pen portraits of all the personalities involved, and candid insider insight into one of the most fascinating periods of recent British political history. 560pp hardback, £25 To buy Coalition Diaries from our website at the special price of £20, please enter promo code “JLH2” www.bitebackpublishing.com Journal of Liberal History advert.indd 1 16/11/2017 12:31 Journal of Liberal History Issue 97: Winter 2017–18 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Liberal history news 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Obituary of Bill Pitt; events at Gladstone’s Library Deputy Editors: Mia Hadfield-Spoor, Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Archive Sources Editor: Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • CHASE Residents' Association
    CHASE Residents’ Association Via: www.chaseresidents.org.uk CHASE Residents’ Association submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consultation on proposed changes to ward boundaries within the London Borough of Croydon We wish to draw the Commission’s attention to difficulties that would be posed by putting into practice draft recommendations for changes to ward boundaries within the Addiscombe area of Croydon Central. We propose an alternative re-drawing of boundaries, a position we believe is in keeping with the views of a number of neighbouring residents’ associations and individuals. Established communities The notional boundaries of the “community” of Addiscombe are distinct from the present electoral ward of Addiscombe in that the community includes a sizeable part of the present Ashburton Ward. Addiscombe Road forms the southern boundary, in both electoral and community terms, for both wards. Residents of Fairfield Ward to the south do not identify with the community of Addiscombe. Within the current electoral wards of Addiscombe and Ashburton there is a more distinct community-based division between: • The western end, where residents living near East Croydon Station gravitate towards shops, schools, churches and facilities in the area between Cherry Orchard Road and Clyde Road. • The eastern side, where the Lower Addiscombe Road is the main district centre serving a community extending from east of Ashburton Park to Elgin Road to the west. Difficulties presented by the proposed boundaries Creating the proposed new wards of Addiscombe West & Park Hill and Addiscombe East by imposing an arbitrary border between Addiscombe/Ashburton and extending these wards south of Addiscombe Road would include areas with no natural affinity with Addiscombe.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 Little Forbidden Ground
    Social policy Tony Little examines Gladstone’s role in the introduction and abolition of the Contagious Diseases Acts The Forbidden Ground Gladstone and the Contagious Diseases Acts Despite their fter a Commons debate on military was added to the specified towns. The medical spending in May 1864, Sir John Trelawny, examination could be repeated at regular inter- quiet passage, the Athe Radical MP, recorded in his diary, ‘I vals for up to year. A further Act, in 1869, added took occasion to mention the necessity of provid- six further towns, and raised the maximum Contagious Dis- ing measures to protect soldiers near large towns detention to nine months.6 A number of colonies eases Acts proved from some contagious diseases & several members adopted similar arrangements but Scotland had its confirmed my advice’.1 Three weeks later the gov- own regime. to be some of the ernment chief whip 2 persuaded Trelawny to delay Despite their quiet passage, the Contagious a critical motion for a week to allow the navy Diseases Acts proved to be some of the most con- most controver- minister3 ‘to introduce 2 bills he has prepared & troversial of Victorian laws and the campaign get them read a second time.’ Trelawney assured against them is viewed as a pioneering feminist sial of Victorian him that he ‘was only concerned to see govern- crusade. Gladstone is not usually associated with ment move in the matter’.4 On 18 July 1864 he the Contagious Diseases Acts. But he was Chan- laws and the cam- concluded, cellor of the Exchequer in Palmerston’s govern- ment which passed the initial legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • What's a Palatine Anyway?
    ~~. ---,. ~-~,.,,}.',, ,, ,., ,. ~........... ~ ... --. ·-~ ~\.,---~- - . ~.- -~ ;-~~ - -- ---~~- -----~......-- . .--------. Ethnic Research · What's a Palatine, Anyvvay? James M. Beidler examines the Palatinate, Germany's emigrant hotbed for centuries. THE PALATINATE, which is now 'Comis Pala tinus ' to 'Pfalzgraf' today as the Palatinate. Less than part of the German state The original title of these courtiers 300 years later, a member of the Rhineland-Palatinate, began sup­ in Latin was comis palatinus (liter­ Wittlesbach family became plying a steady stream of immi­ ally, "companion of the palace"). Pfalzgraf as well as Herzog (duke) grants to America in the late 1n English, this title was count of Bavaria. From this date in the 1600s and contributed to the for­ palatine while in German the 1200s until the early 1800s, there mation of the was a relationship Pennsylvania between the rulers of German culture and Bavaria and of the dialect among Palatinate - culmi­ German ethnics in nating with the ruler the New World. of the Palatinak So many of the inheriting Bavaria Germans who left for in 1777. America in the 18th In the l 300s, the century were from Pfalzgraf became one the Palatinate that of the members of the the word "Palatine" Electoral College that became synonymous was responsible for with "German". This choosing the Holy is especially borne Roman Emperor. As a out in the case of the result, the area ship captains who became known as the transported these Electora I Pa la tinate, immigrants (primari­ or Kurpfalz in ly from Rotterdam to German. Philadelphia) and The Reformed were required to file religion of John lists with the Calvin and Ulrich Pennsylvania author­ Zwingli swept 11,e Palatitrate as depicted in William Blaeu's 1645 atlas Theatrum ities beginning in Orbis Terrarum.
    [Show full text]
  • Harpton Court Estate Records, (GB 0210 HARPTON)
    Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Cymorth chwilio | Finding Aid - Harpton Court Estate Records, (GB 0210 HARPTON) Cynhyrchir gan Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Argraffwyd: Mai 03, 2017 Printed: May 03, 2017 Wrth lunio'r disgrifiad hwn dilynwyd canllawiau ANW a seiliwyd ar ISAD(G) Ail Argraffiad; rheolau AACR2; ac LCSH This description follows NLW guidelines based on ISAD(G) Second Edition; AACR2; and LCSH https://archifau.llyfrgell.cymru/index.php/harpton-court-estate-records archives.library .wales/index.php/harpton-court-estate-records Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Allt Penglais Aberystwyth Ceredigion United Kingdom SY23 3BU 01970 632 800 01970 615 709 [email protected] www.llgc.org.uk Harpton Court Estate Records, Tabl cynnwys | Table of contents Gwybodaeth grynodeb | Summary information .............................................................................................. 3 Hanes gweinyddol / Braslun bywgraffyddol | Administrative history | Biographical sketch ......................... 3 Natur a chynnwys | Scope and content .......................................................................................................... 4 Trefniant | Arrangement .................................................................................................................................. 4 Nodiadau | Notes ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Schedule TR2-58329-Ssa-SL-1-1
    Schedule TR2-59565-sSa-SL-1-1 Schedule information Route: TR2 No. of vehicles used on 25 schedule: Service change: 59565 - SCHEDULE, STRUCTURAL Implementation date: 28 August 2021 Day type: sSa - Special Saturday Operator: SL - ARRIVA LONDON SOUTH Option: 1 Version: 1 Schedule comment: Option comment: TRAMLINK RAIL REPLACEMENT SERVICE Timing points Timing point Transit node Stop ADDSAP Addiscombe, Ashburton Park HJ08 ASHBURTON PARK 17338 Ashburton Park ADDSAP Addiscombe, Ashburton Park HJ08 ASHBURTON PARK 17339 Ashburton Park ADDSTS Addiscombe, Tramstop HJ15 BINGHAM ROAD 17342 Addiscombe Tram Stop ADDSTS Addiscombe, Tramstop HJ15 BINGHAM ROAD 17343 Addiscombe Tram Stop ARNTRM Arena Tram Stop HJ10 LONG LANE BYWOOD AVENUE 18799 Arena Tram Stop ARNTRM Arena Tram Stop HJ10 LONG LANE BYWOOD AVENUE R0746 Arena Tram Stop BECKJS Beckenham Junction Station FJ07 BECKENHAM JUNCTION STN TRS169 Beckenham Junction BECKJS Beckenham Junction Station FJ07 BECKENHAM JUNCTION STN TRS174 Beckenham Junction BECKRD Beckenham Road FP01 BECKENHAM R MACKENZIE RD 19768 Beckenham Road Tram Stop BECKRD Beckenham Road FP01 BECKENHAM R MACKENZIE RD 19769 Beckenham Road Tram Stop BIRKSN Birkbeck Station FP02 BIRKBECK STATION 17413 Birkbeck Station BIRKSN Birkbeck Station FP02 BIRKBECK STATION 17414 Birkbeck Station CROYCO Croydon, Cherry Orchard Road HC25 E CROYDON CHERRY ORCH RD 17348 Addiscombe Road CROYCO Croydon, Cherry Orchard Road HC25 E CROYDON CHERRY ORCH RD 26842 Cherry Orchard Rd / East Croydon Stn CROYPR Croydon, Parkview Road HJ14 ADDISCOMBE BLACK HORSE
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Staff Register
    REGISTER OF INTERESTS OF MEMBERS’ SECRETARIES AND RESEARCH ASSISTANTS (As at 15 October 2020) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register In accordance with Resolutions made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and 28 June 1993, holders of photo-identity passes as Members’ secretaries or research assistants are in essence required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £410 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass. Any gift (eg jewellery) or benefit (eg hospitality, services) that you receive, if the gift or benefit in any way relates to or arises from your work in Parliament and its value exceeds £410 in the course of a calendar year.’ In Section 1 of the Register entries are listed alphabetically according to the staff member’s surname. Section 2 contains exactly the same information but entries are instead listed according to the sponsoring Member’s name. Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae (Updated August 1, 2021)
    DAVID A. BELL SIDNEY AND RUTH LAPIDUS PROFESSOR IN THE ERA OF NORTH ATLANTIC REVOLUTIONS PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Curriculum Vitae (updated August 1, 2021) Department of History Phone: (609) 258-4159 129 Dickinson Hall [email protected] Princeton University www.davidavrombell.com Princeton, NJ 08544-1017 @DavidAvromBell EMPLOYMENT Princeton University, Director, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies (2020-24). Princeton University, Sidney and Ruth Lapidus Professor in the Era of North Atlantic Revolutions, Department of History (2010- ). Associated appointment in the Department of French and Italian. Johns Hopkins University, Dean of Faculty, School of Arts & Sciences (2007-10). Responsibilities included: Oversight of faculty hiring, promotion, and other employment matters; initiatives related to faculty development, and to teaching and research in the humanities and social sciences; chairing a university-wide working group for the Johns Hopkins 2008 Strategic Plan. Johns Hopkins University, Andrew W. Mellon Professor in the Humanities (2005-10). Principal appointment in Department of History, with joint appointment in German and Romance Languages and Literatures. Johns Hopkins University. Professor of History (2000-5). Johns Hopkins University. Associate Professor of History (1996-2000). Yale University. Assistant Professor of History (1991-96). Yale University. Lecturer in History (1990-91). The New Republic (Washington, DC). Magazine reporter (1984-85). VISITING POSITIONS École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Visiting Professor (June, 2018) Tokyo University, Visiting Fellow (June, 2017). École Normale Supérieure (Paris), Visiting Professor (March, 2005). David A. Bell, page 1 EDUCATION Princeton University. Ph.D. in History, 1991. Thesis advisor: Prof. Robert Darnton. Thesis title: "Lawyers and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Paris (1700-1790)." Princeton University.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zoab Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 46106 7619623
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) dr section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages, This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]