DOCSLIB.ORG

The Persian Wars East V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Persian Wars East V The Persian Wars East v. West The Timeline Battle of Plataea Battle of War Ionian Revolt Marathon Battle of Thermopylae/ Ends Begins & 449 BCE Battle of Salamis Strait 499 BCE War Begins 479 BCE 490 BCE 480 BCE And in this corner… Who was involved in the Persian War? & What were their strategies? Persian Soldiers Greek Soldiers called Hoplites Persian Strategy Greek Strategy Greater numbers Hoplites used the tended to overwhelm phalanx formation opposing armies to drive opponents off field Greek Warfare • Naval Warfare • Greek Ships called Triremes- rowed ship with heavy iron ram on front • Land Warfare • Used phalanx tactics • Metal shields • Spears and swords (close range weapons) Persian Weapons • Leather and wood shields • Short Swords • Depended on large number of archers • Had larger navy than Athens The Persian Wars #1 Event Ionian Revolt:(499 BCE How did the Persian Wars Start? • Cyrus the Great conquered the • Greek city-state, Ionia in 547 BCE. • The Greeks had moved there after the collapse of Mycenae and the beginning of the Greek Dark Ages • The Ionians revolted against the Persian Tyrants with the support of their Athenian Greek countryman with ships and troops, but lost. #1 Event Ionian Revolt:(499 BCE • Greeks burns Sardis to the ground. (Persian) • Persia comes back, burns city of Miletus to the ground. (Greek) • Darius the Great vowed to punish Athens for their support of the revolt. Darius decided that all the city-states in Greece posed a threat to his empire, so he decided to conquer all of Greece. #2 Event: Battle of Marathon (Greek Victory) 490 BCE • Darius decides to invade the Greek mainland and take it over. • Sends messengers to ask for surrender • Greeks- according to legend throw messengers into a pit Battle of Marathon (Greek Victory) 490 BCE • The first invasion of Greece by the Persian Empire ended with this battle. • The city of Marathon was successfully defended against the Persian invasion. • Marathon was made famous by Pheidippides’ 25 mile run to Athens to alert the city of the victory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkYjE22GP2Y Battle of Marathon (Greek Victory) 490 BCE • Sparta is having a religious festival and can’t help until tomorrow • Athenians meet them with their allies- led by General Militades • Sweep around the Persians, surround them and defeat them • Greeks form an Alliance to protect against further Persian aggression #3 Event: Battle of Thermopylae/ Artemisium (Persian Victory) 480 BCE This battle took place during the second Persian invasion of Greece. Who led the Spartan and Athenian Armies? Athenian General Themistocles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1LBMBo2ZPg King Leonidas of Sparta Darius has died Xerxes, his son decides that the time has come to try to invade again Battle of Thermopylae/Artemisium (Persian Victory) 480 BCE • The Greeks use their alliance • Athens and Sparta lead army and fleet to fight • Sparta makes a stand at Thermopylae (land) • Athens makes stand at (navy) the Straits of Artemisium • Small passage between mountains- makes it hard for Archers to shoot, hard for troops in come in large numbers- Xerxes loses his biggest advantage • A traitor shows the way around http://www.ancientgreece.co.uk/war/story/sto_set.html • About 1300 men (300 were Spartans) fought to the death to stop the Persians army of 100,000-300,000 • Athens voted to abandon the city • Xerxes burns Athens to the ground #4 Event: Battle of Salamis (Greek Victory) 480 BCE • Athenian navy commander- Themistocles thought of way to defeat the larger Persian navy. • Used similar tactics to Spartans- Salamis strait was a small channel between two areas of land. • Themistocles told Persians that he wanted to switch sides. • Persians came to join Themistocles • The other Greeks acted like they were retreating, but suddenly attacked and rammed 300 ships down. • The Persians retreated Battle of Salamis (Greek Victory) 480 BCE • Once again outnumbered General Themistocles leads Greece to a victory at sea. • According to Herodotus, the Persian fleet initially numbered 1,207 triremes • The Greek fleet numbered 366 triremes • Significance of the battle: it marked the turning point of the war. #5 Event: Battle of Plataea (Greek Victory) 479 BCE • Xerxes retreats back to Asia Minor • Bridges at Hellespont have been destroyed- weather is not a fan of Xerxes • Leaves an army to attack in the Spring • Greeks have to decide whether or not to continue their alliance #5 Event: Battle of Plataea (Greek Victory) 479 BCE What Happened? • Greeks continue their alliance • Xerxes attacks in the Spring. • 80,000 allied Greek soldiers defeat the Persian Army. http://www.ancientgreece.co.uk/war/home_set.html Outcome of the Persian Wars • Alliances were formed to continue protection from Persian threat • Delian League (Athens) • Peloponnesian League (Sparta) http://slideplayer.com/slide/228183/ https://www.google.com/search?q=boxing+ring&safe=strict&e spv=2&biw=1093&bih=510&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ve http://search.myway.com/search/AJimage.jhtml d=0ahUKEwjkq6uro_TQAhXEIpAKHXAkC8AQ_AUIBigB ?n=782b92a4&p2=%5EY6%5Exdm003%5ES175 47%5Eus&pg=AJimage&pn=1&ptb=156D124D- AE9F-4BA6-AC5A- https://www.google.com/search?q=pheidippides&safe=strict& 20D5736FDED5&qs=&searchfor=phalanx&si=CK espv=2&biw=1093&bih=510&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&v rC-- ed=0ahUKEwiekaWYtPTQAhVIIpAKHdxoB4MQ_AUIBigB&dpr=1 vL99ACFdOPswodr18M7g&ss=sub&st=tab&tpr= .25#imgrc=_ sbt&trs=wtt https://www.google.com/search?q=themistocles&safe=strict& https://www.google.com/search?q=xerxes&s espv=2&biw=1093&bih=510&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&v afe=active&espv=2&biw=1093&bih=510&sou ed=0ahUKEwiM88CByPTQAhWBjJAKHQ3DDrYQ_AUIBigB#imgrc rce=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZo =3aSmJGr_BG0UEM%3A cDP- v3QAhXHLyYKHfvhCcIQ_AUIBigB#safe=active https://www.google.com/search?q=battle+of+salamis&safe=ac &t tive&espv=2&biw=1093&bih=510&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa https://www.pinterest.com/pin/3094114 =X&ved=0ahUKEwjV7rTEvffQAhXnJsAKHUD5CcwQ_AUIBigB#im 36880869952/ grc=LBRwssnJLHG4HM%3A http://www.ancientgreekbattles.net/Pages/47948_Plataea_III. htm.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 341 BC the THIRD PHILIPPIC Demosthenes Translated By
    1 341 BC THE THIRD PHILIPPIC Demosthenes translated by Thomas Leland, D.D. Notes and Introduction by Thomas Leland, D.D. 2 Demosthenes (383-322 BC) - Athenian statesman and the most famous of Greek orators. He was leader of a patriotic party opposing Philip of Macedon. The Third Philippic (341 BC) - The third in a series of speeches in which Demosthenes attacks Philip of Macedon. Demosthenes urged the Athenians to oppose Philip’s conquests of independent Greek states. Cicero later used the name “Philippic” to label his bitter speeches against Mark Antony; the word has since come to stand for any harsh invective. 3 THE THIRD PHILIPPIC INTRODUCTION To the Third Philippic THE former oration (The Oration on the State of the Chersonesus) has its effect: for, instead of punishing Diopithes, the Athenians supplied him with money, in order to put him in a condition of continuing his expeditions. In the mean time Philip pursued his Thracian conquests, and made himself master of several places, which, though of little importance in themselves, yet opened him a way to the cities of the Propontis, and, above all, to Byzantium, which he had always intended to annex to his dominions. He at first tried the way of negotiation, in order to gain the Byzantines into the number of his allies; but this proving ineffectual, he resolved to proceed in another manner. He had a party in the city at whose head was the orator Python, that engaged to deliver him up one of the gates: but while he was on his march towards the city the conspiracy was discovered, which immediately determined him to take another route.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Hoplites and Their Origins
    Ancient Greek Hoplites and their Origins By Jordan Wilde Senior Seminar (HST 499W) June 6, 2008 Primary Reader: Dr. Benedict Lowe Secondary Reader: Dr. Lorie Carlson Course Instructor: Dr. David Doellinger History Department Western Oregon University 1 The ancient Greek hoplites were heavily armed infantry soldiers, known for wearing extensive armor, carrying a large rounded shield, spears, and a sword. By looking at armor, weapons, tactics, and vases recovered from archaeological digs, along with literature of the time, such as Homer’s Iliad (ca. 700 B.C.)1 and Hesiod’s Shield of Heracles (ca. end of the late 8th century B.C)2, who and what a hoplite was can be defined. The scholarly consensus has been that eighth century B.C. is crucial in exploring the origins of hoplites. The eighth century sees a dramatic increase in population leading to the rise of city-states and hoplites. In this paper I am going to consider the evidence for the existence of hoplites during the eighth century B.C. and whether or not there is any evidence for their existence before this. When examining evidence for defining when hoplites first appeared, it’s important to understand what makes a hoplite unique, specifically his equipment, weapons, and tactics. In the article “Hoplites and Heresies,” A.J. Holladay looks at the overall view of the hoplite on the battlefield and some forms of military tactics the Greeks might have had. Holladay examines what is typically assumed as hoplite customs, fighting in a close pack, with their shields in their left hand protecting themselves and their neighbors as well as carrying a spear in their right hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking for Interpreter Zero: the Irony of Themistocles
    Looking for Interpreter Zero: The Irony of Themistocles Themistocles and his historians reflect a range of attitudes to language, identity and loyalty, giving us a sense of attitudes towards interpreters far back in time and memory. Christine ADAMS. Published: March 1, 2019 Last updated: March 1, 2019 Themistocles was a rare example of a Greek who could speak a foreign language …[1] This sense of a common tongue was the decisive criterion for determining who were Greeks [2] Herodotus (484-425 BCE) tells the story of the cradle of western civilisation in The Histories of the Persian Wars, relating the stories of the Greeks and their neighbours - those they called Barbarians - and giving detailed information about the peoples of the Mediterranean as well as the lead up to the wars, before giving an account of the wars themselves. “By combining oral accounts of the past with his own observation of surviving monuments, natural phenomena and local customs, he produced a prose narrative of unprecedented length, intellectual depth and explanatory power.”[3] Histories shows an awareness of the need for language intermediaries, drawing a distinction between linguists and the ‘interpreters’ of dreams or oracular pronouncements and citing instances of interpreters at work. There were Greek-speaking communities in Egypt, for instance. The Pharaoh Psammetichus had allowed them to settle and had honoured all of his commitments to them. He had even “intrusted to their care certain Egyptian children whom they were to teach the language of the Greeks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander's Empire
    4 Alexander’s Empire MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES EMPIRE BUILDING Alexander the Alexander’s empire extended • Philip II •Alexander Great conquered Persia and Egypt across an area that today consists •Macedonia the Great and extended his empire to the of many nations and diverse • Darius III Indus River in northwest India. cultures. SETTING THE STAGE The Peloponnesian War severely weakened several Greek city-states. This caused a rapid decline in their military and economic power. In the nearby kingdom of Macedonia, King Philip II took note. Philip dreamed of taking control of Greece and then moving against Persia to seize its vast wealth. Philip also hoped to avenge the Persian invasion of Greece in 480 B.C. TAKING NOTES Philip Builds Macedonian Power Outlining Use an outline to organize main ideas The kingdom of Macedonia, located just north of Greece, about the growth of had rough terrain and a cold climate. The Macedonians were Alexander's empire. a hardy people who lived in mountain villages rather than city-states. Most Macedonian nobles thought of themselves Alexander's Empire as Greeks. The Greeks, however, looked down on the I. Philip Builds Macedonian Power Macedonians as uncivilized foreigners who had no great A. philosophers, sculptors, or writers. The Macedonians did have one very B. important resource—their shrewd and fearless kings. II. Alexander Conquers Persia Philip’s Army In 359 B.C., Philip II became king of Macedonia. Though only 23 years old, he quickly proved to be a brilliant general and a ruthless politician. Philip transformed the rugged peasants under his command into a well-trained professional army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phocian Betrayal at Thermopylae
    historia 68, 2019/4, 413–435 DOI 10.25162/historia-2019-0022 Jeffrey Rop The Phocian Betrayal at Thermopylae Abstract: This article makes three arguments regarding the Battle of Thermopylae. First, that the discovery of the Anopaea path was not dependent upon Ephialtes, but that the Persians were aware of it at their arrival and planned their attacks at Thermopylae, Artemisium, and against the Phocians accordingly. Second, that Herodotus’ claims that the failure of the Pho- cians was due to surprise, confusion, and incompetence are not convincing. And third, that the best explanation for the Phocian behavior is that they were from Delphi and betrayed their allies as part of a bid to restore local control over the sanctuary. Keywords: Thermopylae – Artemisium – Delphi – Phocis – Medism – Anopaea The courageous sacrifice of Leonidas and the Spartans is perhaps the central theme of Herodotus’ narrative and of many popular retellings of the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BCE. Even as modern historians are appropriately more critical of this heroizing impulse, they have tended to focus their attention on issues that might explain why Leo- nidas and his men fought to the death. These include discussion of the broader strategic and tactical importance of Thermopylae, the inter-relationship and chronology of the Greek defense of the pass and the naval campaign at Artemisium, the actual number of Greeks who served under Leonidas and whether it was sufficient to hold the position, and so on. While this article inevitably touches upon some of these same topics, its main purpose is to reconsider the decisive yet often overlooked moment of the battle: the failure of the 1,000 Phocians on the Anopaea path.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persian Wars: Ionian Revolt the Ionian Revolt, Which Began in 499
    The Persian Wars: Ionian Revolt The Ionian Revolt, which began in 499 B.C. marked the beginning of the Greek-Persian wars. In 546 B.C. the Persians had conquered the wealthy Greek settlements in Ionia (Asia Minor). The Persians took the Ionians’ farmland and harbors. They forced the Ionians to pay tributes (the regular payments of goods). The Ionians also had to serve in the Persian army. The Ionians knew they could not defeat the Persians by themselves, so they asked mainland Greece for help. Athens sent soldiers and a small fleet of ships. Unfortunately for the Ionians, the Athenians went home after their initial success, leaving the small Ionian army to fight alone. In 493 B.C. the Persian army defeated the Ionians. To punish the Ionians for rebelling, the Persians destroyed the city of Miletus. They may have sold some of tis people into slavery. The Persian Wars: Battle of Marathon After the Ionian Revolt, the Persian King Darius decided to conquer the city-states of mainland Greece. He sent messengers to ask for presents of Greek earth and water as a sign that the Greeks agreed to accept Persian rule. But the Greeks refused. Darius was furious. In 490 B.C., he sent a large army of foot soldiers and cavalry (mounted soldiers) across the Aegean Sea by boat to Greece. The army assembled on the pain of Marathon. A general named Miltiades (Mill-te-ah-deez) convinced the other Greek commanders to fight the Persians at Marathon. In need of help, the Athenians sent a runner named Pheidippides (Fa-dip-e-deez) to Sparta who ran for two days and two nights.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Study Guide Key
    Chapter 9 Study Guide Key 7th Grade World History Vocabulary Cavalry – a unit of soldiers who ride horses. The Persian empire was known for their use of cavalry, helping to make them so victorious in battle Hellenistic – Greek-like - when a cultural idea is heavily influenced by Greek ideas (Example – cities of Alexandria created by Alexander.) Alliance – agreement to work together – as in the Persian Wars Vocabulary Phalanx – A square fighting formation – commonly used by Alexander & Sparta Satraps – governors in the Persian empire Helots – Slaves in Sparta – made up majority of population & heavily relied upon Parthenon – Great temple in Athens dedicated to the goddess Athena. Commissioned by Pericles after the Persian Wars. People to Know Cyrus the Great – Rebelled against the Medes to create the Persian Empire. Known for letting others keep their customs to help prevent rebellions Darius I – Leader of the Persians when Greek mainland city-states sent help to the Ionian city- states. Leader during the Battle of Marathon People to Know Xerxes I – the son of Darius. Was the leader of the Persian Wars during the battles of Thermopylae, Salamis & Plataea. Set up his golden throne to watch the Battle of Salamis – which he lost, forcing him to retreat to Persia Philip of Macedonia – Father of Alexander the Great. Conquered the Greek city-states. Alexander the Great – Macedonian King – came to power after his father was murdered. Helped to create the largest empire in the world at that point. Never lost a battle. Died at age 32 from malaria. People to Know Plato – a student of Socrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Strauss
    Faith for the Fight BARRY STRAUSS At a recent academic conference on an- cient history and modern politics, a copy of Robert D. Ka- plan’s Warrior Politics was held up by a speaker as an example of the current influence of the classics on Washing- ton policymakers, as if the horseman shown on the cover was riding straight from the Library of Congress to the Capitol.* One of the attendees was unimpressed. He de- nounced Kaplan as a pseudo-intellectual who does more harm than good. But not so fast: it is possible to be skeptical of the first claim without accepting the second. Yes, our politicians may quote Kaplan more than they actually read him, but if they do indeed study what he has to say, then they will be that much the better for it. Kaplan is not a scholar, as he admits, but there is nothing “pseudo” about his wise and pithy book. Kaplan is a journalist with long experience of living in and writing about the parts of the world that have exploded in recent decades: such places as Bosnia, Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, India, and Pakistan. Anyone who has made it through those trouble spots is more than up to the rigors of reading about the Peloponnesian War, even if he doesn’t do so in Attic Greek. A harsh critic might complain about Warrior Politics’ lack of a rigorous analytical thread, but not about the absence of a strong central thesis. Kaplan is clear about his main point: we will face our current foreign policy crises better by going *Robert D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second After the King and Achaemenid Bactria on Classical Sources
    The Second after the King and Achaemenid Bactria on Classical Sources MANEL GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ Universidad de Barcelona–CEIPAC* ABSTRACT The government of the Achaemenid Satrapy of Bactria is frequently associated in Classical sources with the Second after the King. Although this relationship did not happen in all the cases of succession to the Achaemenid throne, there is no doubt that the Bactrian government considered it valuable and important both for the stability of the Empire and as a reward for the loser in the succession struggle to the Achaemenid throne. KEYWORDS Achaemenid succession – Achaemenid Bactria – Achaemenid Kingship Crown Princes – porphyrogenesis Beyond the tradition that made of Zoroaster the and harem royal intrigues among the successors King of the Bactrians, Rege Bactrianorum, qui to the throne in the Achaemenid Empire primus dicitur artes magicas invenisse (Justinus (Shahbazi 1993; García Sánchez 2005; 2009, 1.1.9), Classical sources sometimes relate the 155–175). It is in this context where we might Satrapy of Bactria –the Persian Satrapy included find some explicit references to the reward for Sogdiana as well (Briant 1984, 71; Briant 1996, the prince who lost the succession dispute: the 403 s.)– along with the princes of the offer of the government of Bactria as a Achaemenid royal family and especially with compensation for the damage done after not the ruled out prince in the succession, the having been chosen as a successor of the Great second in line to the throne, sometimes King (Sancisi–Weerdenburg 1980, 122–139; appointed in the sources as “the second after the Briant 1984, 69–80).
    [Show full text]
  • Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze "What If " Scenarios Josh Wasserman Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2017 Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze "What If " Scenarios Josh Wasserman Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Classics Commons, and the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Wasserman, Josh, "Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze "What If" Scenarios" (2017). Honors Theses. 99. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/99 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze “What-If” Scenarios By Joshua Wasserman ********* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Computer Science UNION COLLEGE May, 2017 Abstract WASSERMAN, JOSHUA Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze “What-If” Scenarios. Department of Computer Science, May, 2017. ADVISOR: Valerie Barr and Hans-Friedrich Mueller The Battle of Thermopylae (480 BCE) was a last ditch effort to stall the Persian army as it marched south toward Athens. Led by Leonidas and his personal guard of 300 Spartans, a citizen army of Greeks was able to delay a Persian army of over 100,000 soldiers at the town of Thermopylae for several days. Although the Greeks were ultimately defeated at Thermopylae, the battle provided enough time for the Greek states to regroup and plan a counter attack, eventually defeating the invading Persians.
    [Show full text]