Piloting Knowledge Swaraj: a Hand Book on Indian Science and Technology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Piloting Knowledge Swaraj: A hand book on Indian Science and Technology Edited by C. Shambu Prasad Xavier Institute of Management Bhubaneswar [email protected] For Knowledge In Civil Society (KICS) – Centre for World Solidarity i | Piloting Knowledge Swaraj March 2011 Acknowledgements This handbook would not have been possible without the active support of so many individuals and organisations. The SET DEV project has benefitted from several national and international networks and collaborations. Alfonso Alfonsi and Danielle Mezza of LSC have been very supportive of the ideas, many of them unconventional, at every stage and we are happy that they could interact with many of our case study leaders and be part of some of the focus group discussions. Axel Carlberg participated actively and enthusiastically in helping us think about medical ethics. Wiebe Bijker from the University of Maastricht has been a source of great inspiration throughout the project and as a member of the case advisory committee has made valuable inputs into earlier drafts. Thomas Mougey, a student of Wiebe Bijker at the Maastricht University did his internship at KICS-CWS and contributed significantly through analysis the bio-ethics literature. Andrei Kuznetsov provided valuable inputs and feedback of a draft document that was sent in November 2010. We thank all our international partners for their valuable contributions. Haribabu, Prajit Basu and Kulkarni from the University of Hyderabad were quite generous with their time and for taking the leap in having faith in the “non-academic” case study leaders to take the exploration of the Indian manifesto by practitioners from civil society organisations. Haribabu also contributed as a member of the advisory team and Prajit Basu was more than willing to think along with the medical ethics case study team offering very gracefully to put the practitioners upfront in the few academic seminars that ensued as a result of the case study. Kavitha Kuruganti helped us significantly with the editing of the case studies and actively participating in the workshops and electronic communications that led to this handbook. We owe a lot to her persistent efforts. Administering the case studies and managing them was done with remarkable efficiency by the CWS team ably led by Dr Gnana Prakasam and Soma Sastry who were extremely supportive in ensuring that at no point administrative matters, even knotty ones, ever came in the way of the process and they were more than willing to walk the extra mile to make things happen. We do owe a lot to CWS for taking on this rather complex process in a short time and for offering their facilities and hospitality for all the discussions. Kameswara Rao, Srinivasa Rao, Prakash, Bhagirath and Sumedha played important roles in helping us throughout the consultations and discussions. Our case study leaders were from diverse fields with different kinds of expertise. This handbook would not have been possible without their active collaboration. Working with them has helped us understand what it means to socialise science in ways that we would have never been able to glean from any of the academic literature. They challenged expertise, and were willing to be challenged too, and agreed to share their findings in an open and transparent manner thus bringing meaning and life to issues of knowledge and democracy. There were surprises in the process and we were happy that those that we drew from outside our KICS network in some aspects performed better. We thank Dr Prakash and Kameswari and their veritable ecosystem of the medical ethics team, Radha Kunke and John D Souza for the sustainable built environment case; Ramachandrudu, Chitra Krishnan and Ramamohan for the water case study that feature in this book. Walter Mendoza and John D Souza worked on the focus group and climate change case study and Chandra Sekhar, Ramanjaneyulu and Dr N K Sanghi on the consultative workshop and case study on knowledge issues in sustainable agriculture. KICS members played important roles in the process at various times – Rama Melkote as a case advisory member, Sreekumar, Annapurna and Syama Sundari offered to work on cases on handlooms and energy but were preoccupied, Himanshu Thakkar and Dinesh Mishra made important contributions to the reconstruction and water case studies. Shravani Roy as a research associate of KICS at Bhubaneswar and Murali Karnam as a programme officer of KICS played important parts at critical stages of the case study processes and we thank them for their efforts. This handbook we hope will inspire other efforts and would not have been possible without the vision, mentorship and guidance of M V Sastri who was always there to steer and guide us through many difficulties we had to face with such a complex and at times ambitious exercise ensuring that we travelled together despite differences. We would like to dedicate this collective effort, incomplete though it might be to Sastri garu. Shambu Prasad March 2011 ii | Piloting Knowledge Swaraj March 2011 Contents PILOTING KNOWLEDGE SWARAJ IN INDIA: A HANDBOOK ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN INDIA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Methodology of the Pilots................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Piloting Knowledge Swaraj ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. MEDICAL ETHICS: A CASE STUDY OF HYSTERECTOMY IN ANDHRA PRADESH .............................. 8 2.1 THE ISSUE: ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 HYSTERECTOMY – THE CLINICAL PICTURE ............................................................................................................. 11 2.3. HYSTERECTOMY – SOCIAL FACTORS AND CONSEQUENCES ................................................................................. 24 2. 4 HYSTERECTOMY – ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 39 2.5 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................................ 49 3. SUSTAINABILITY AND PLURALITY IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT: A CASE STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 54 3.1 The Case-Study and its methodology ............................................................................................................. 54 3.1.1 Methodology adopted: ............................................................................................................................... 55 3.2 Introduction: Built Environment and Reconstruction ..................................................................................... 57 3.3 Approaches in Reconstruction ....................................................................................................................... 59 3.3.1 Comparison of Reconstruction Approaches ........................................................................................... 61 3.4. Overview of three disasters: The Context ..................................................................................................... 62 3.4.1 The Gujarat Earthquake ............................................................................................................................ 63 3.4.2 The Tsunami in Tamil Nadu ...................................................................................................................... 64 3.4.3 Bihar Kosi Floods ........................................................................................................................................ 65 3.5. Policy environment & Regulatory mechanisms: ............................................................................................ 66 3.5.1 Institutional arrangements and reconstruction approaches ................................................................. 67 3.5.2 Guidelines, Building Codes and Norms .................................................................................................. 68 3.5.3 Where ‘guidelines’ fail and/or are inadequate ........................................................................................ 71 iii | Piloting Knowledge Swaraj March 2011 3.6. “Whose space is it anyway?” ........................................................................................................................ 74 3.6.1 The ‘Client’ and the Commission .............................................................................................................. 74 3.6.2 Site allocation: Relocation vs. In-situ Reconstruction ........................................................................... 78 3.6.3 Habitat Planning / Settlement Design ...................................................................................................... 79 3.6.4 Building: design, materials and technologies ........................................................................................