DOCSLIB.ORG

CHAPTER TWO - UPPER IRWELL SUB-CATCHMENT National Rivers Authority Guildbourne House Worthing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

N RA- N orth W e s -L 14- CHAPTER TWO - UPPER IRWELL SUB-CATCHMENT National Rivers Authority Guildbourne House Worthing Please return this book on or before last date shown below. Renewals can be obtained by contacting the library. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 6 9 7 4 8 IRWELL CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT CHAPTER TWO - UPPER IRWELL SUB-CATCHMENT Front Cover photograph : Upper Irwell, Canoe and Fish Passes and Weir at Ramsbottom This report has been produced on recycled paper in line with NRA policy UPPER IRWELL CONSULTATION REPORT CONTENTS Section Page No. Index of Maps 9 Upper Irwell Sub-Catchment Details 10 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Catchment Description 12 1.2 Hydrology 13 1.3 Hydrometric Network 14 1.4 Hydrogeology 15 1.5 Flood Defence 16 1.6 Water Quality 17 September 1994 2 Irwell CMP Chapter Two - Upper Irwell Sub-Catchment CONTENTS 2. CATCHMENT USES AND ACTIVITIES Page No. 2.1 Flood Defence 18 2.1.1 General 18 2.1.2 Local Perspective 18 2.1.3 Flood Warning 19 2.1.4 Objectives , 1 9 2.1.5 Environmental Requirements 19 2.2 Development ' 20 2.2.1 General 20 2.2.2 Local Perspective 20 2.2.3 Local Planning Policy 20 2.2.4 Future Development in the Catchment 21 2.3 Potable (Drinking) W ater Supply 22 2.3.1 General 22 2.3.2 Local Perspective 22 2.3.3 Supply Objectives and Standards 23 2.3.4 Customer Supply Requirements 24 Water Quantity Water Quality Groundwater Quality 2.3.5 Environmental Requirements 24 Industrial and Agricultural Abstractions 25 2.4.1 General 25 2.4.2 Local Perspective 25 Industrial General Agriculture Spray Irrigation 2.4.3 Supply Objectives and Standards 25 2.4.4 Customer Requirements 26 Water Quantity Water Quality 2.4.5 Environmental Requirements 26 September 1994 3 Irwell CMP Chapter Two - Upper IrwelJ Sub-Catchment CONTENTS Page No. 2.5 W ater Power (including Mill Rights) 27 2.5.1 General 27 2.5.2 Local Perspective 27 2.5.3 Environmental Objectives 27 Water Quality Water Quantity Physical Features 2.6 Resource Usage 28 2.6.1 General 28 2.6.2 Local Perspective 28 Surface Water Groundwater 2.7 Effluent Disposal 29 2.7.1 General 29 Continuous Effluents Intermittent Effluents 2.7.2 Local Perspective 29 Continuous Effluents Intermittent Effluents 2.7.3 Environmental Objectives 30 2.7.4 Environmental Requirements 30 Water Quality Water Quantity 2.8 Landfill Sites 31 2.8.1 General 31 2.8.2 Local Perspective 31 2.8.3 Objectives 31 2.8.4 Environmental Requirements 31 Water Quality Water Quantity Physical Features 2.9 Mineral Extraction 33 2.9.1 General 33 2.9.2 Local Perspective 33 2.9.3 Objectives and Standards 33 2.9.4 Environmental Requirements 33. Water Quality Water Quantity Physical Features September 1994 4 Irwell CMP Chapter Two • Upper Invell Sub-Catchment CONTENTS Page No. 2.10 Groundwater Protection 35 2.10.1 General 35 2.10.2 Local Perspective 35 2.11 Fisheries 37 2.11.1 General 37 2.11.2 Local Perspective 37 2.11.3 Environmental Objectives 38 2.11.4 Environmental Requirements 38 Water Quality Water Quantity Physical Features 2.12 Conservation 39 2.12.1 General - - .............. - 39 2.12.2 Local Perspective 39 2.12.3 Aquatic Invertebrates 41 2.12.4 Environmental Objectives " 42 2.12.5 Environmental Requirements 42 Water .Quality Water Quantity Physical Features 2.13 Landscape and Heritage 44 2.13.1 General 44 2.13.2 Local Perspective 44 2.13.3 Environmental Objectives 45 2.13.4 Environmental Requirements 45 Water Quality Water Quantity Physical Features 2.14 Recreation and Amenity 47 2.14.1 General 47 2.14.2 Local Perspective - - - ................... ^ 2.14.3 Environmental Objectives 47 2.14.4 Environmental Requirements 47 Water Quality Water Quantity Physical Features 2.15 Angling 49 2.15.1 General 49 2.15.2 Local Perspective 49 2.15.3 Objectives 49 2.15.4 Environmental Requirements 49 Water Quality Water Quantity Physical Features September 1994 5 Irwell CMP Chapter Two - Upper InveM Sub-Catchment CONTENTS Page No. 3. - CATCHMENT OBJECTIVES 3.1 Flood Defence Objectives 51 3.1.1 General 51 3.1.2 Objectives 51 3.2 Water Quantity Objectives 52 3.2.1 General 52 3.2.2 Objectives 52 Water Abstraction Surface Waters Local Hydrometric Objectives Groundwaters 3.3 W ater Quality Objectives 54 3.3.1 Water Quality Classification 54 a) Present Water Quality Classification Objectives b) Future Water Quality Classification Objectives 3.3.2 EC Directives 55 a) Directive on Dangerous Substances in Water b) Directive on Urban Wastewater Treatment c) Directive on Water Quality for Freshwater Fish d) Directive on Abstraction of Surface Water for Drinking 3.3.3 Groundwater Protection Objectives 56 3.4 Physical Features Objectives .58 3.4.1 General 58 3.4.2 Objectives 58 Development Control Potable Water Supply, Agricultural and Industrial Abstraction Mineral Extraction and Landfill Sites Fisheries Conservation Landscape and Heritage Recreation and Amenity Angling September 1994 6 Irwell CMP Chapter Two - Upper Irwell Sub-Catchment CONTENTS Page No. 4. CURRENT STATE OF THE CATCHMENT 4.1 State of Catchment: Flood Defence 60 4.1.1 General 60 4.1.2 Issues Identified 60 a) Catchment Wide Issues b) Site Specific Issues 4.2 State of the Catchm ent: W ater Quantity 62 4.2.1 General 62 4.2.2 Local Hydrometric Network 62 River Level Recording Rainfall Monitoring 4.2.3 Issues Identified 63 a) Catchment Wide Issues b) Site Specific Issues 4.3 State of the Catchment: Water Quality 64 4.3.1 Water Quality Classification - 64 a) Present Water Quality Classification Objectives b) Future Water Quality Classification Objectives 4.3.2 EC Directives 64 a) Directive on Dangerous Substances in Water b) Directive on Urban Wastewater Treatment c) Directive on Water Quality for Freshwater Fish d) Directive on Abstraction of Surface Water for Drinking 4.3.3 Issues Identified 65 a) Catchment Wide Issues b) Site Specific Issues 4.4 State of the Catchment: Physical Features 70 4.4.1 General 70 4.4.2 Issues Identified 70 a) Catchment Wide Issues b) Site Specific Issues September 1994 7 Irwell CMP Chapter Two - Upper Irwell Sub-Catchment CONTENTS Page No. 5. ISSUES AND OPTIONS 5.1 General 71 5.2 Catchment Wide Issues 72 5.3 Site Specific Issues 73 September 1994 8 Irwell CMP Chapter Two - Upper Invell Sub-Catchment INDEX OF MAPS Map No. Title Facing Page No. 1 Upper Irwell Location 10 2 Upper Irwell Catchment with Infrastructure 12 3 Hydrometric Network 14 4 Summary Geological Map 15 5 River Network 16 6 Licensed Abstractions: Public Water Supply 22 7 Licensed Abstractions: Industrial & Agricultural 25 8 Water Power 27 9 Effluent Disposal 29 10 Landfill Sites 31 11 Fisheries 1 : River Habitat Potential 37 12 Fisheries 2 : Actual Fish Species Present 37 13 Fisheries 3 : Shortfalls in Habitat Potential 3 7 14 Designated Sites of Conservation Importance 39 15 River Invertebrate Diversity 41 16 Landscape and Heritage 44 17 Recreation and Amenity 47 18 Flood Defence: River Corridor Land Use Plan 51 19 Flood Defence: Objectives 51 20 Water Quality: Present Classification Objectives 54 21 EC Directive Compliance <■ 55 22 Flood Defence: Flood Risk Areas .60 23 Flood Defence: State of the Catchment 60 24 Flood Defence : Existing Levels of Protection 60 25 . Water Quality : State of the Catchment 64 26 Site Specific Issues Location Map 71 September 1994 9 Invell CMP Cliapter Two - Upper Invell Sub-Catchment 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 uU ot 30 30 28 UPPER IRWELL LOCATION 28 26 KEY 26 Irwell catchment boundary 24 24 Upper Irwell Sub-Catchment 22 boundary 22 Sub-Catchment boundary 20 20 Built up area 18 Watercourse 18 Culverted section 16 16 Canal 14 Irwell Catchment Management Plan 14 Upper Irwell Sub-Catchment 12 12 June 1994 Map 1 10 NRA 10 08 V ' National Rivers Authority 08 North West Region 06 06 04 04 02 02 SD N SE 00 A 00 SJ SK 98 98 96 96 10 km _l 94 I____ L J____ L 94 92 92 S J SK 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 "72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 UPPER IRWELL SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS (MAP 1) Area 186 km' Population 175,000 MAIN TOWNS AND POPULATIONS Bury 63,390 Radcliffe 32,032 Ramsbottom 12,228 Tottington 12,141 Rawtenstall 10,500 ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS District Councils:- Bury Metropolitan Borough Council Rossendale Borough Council Blackburn District Council (Part) Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (Part) NRA:- North West Region - South Area Water Companies:- North West Water Ltd Principal Sewage Treatment Works:- Bury Rossendale TOPOGRAPHY Ground Levels Min. Level 50 mAOD Max. Level 475 mAOD GEOLOGY Solid Geology:- Predominantly Carboniferous Coal Measures and Millstone Grit Series Superficial Geology:- Variable - Giacial Till (Boulder Clay) Sand and Peat. September 1994 10 Invell CMP Chapter Two - Upper Invell Sub-Catchment UPPER IRWELL SUB-CATCHMENT DETAILS WATER RESOURCES Availability:- Groundwater - Generally site specific Surface Water - Good availability FLOOD PROTECTION Length of Designated Main River > 91.91 km. (maintained by NRA) Riparian owned debris screens cleaned by the NRA on a best endeavours basis 4 WATER QUALITY Length of River in National Water Council Class 1993 Assessment Class 1A (Very Good) 0.0 km.
Recommended publications
  • Patient Participation Group Newsletter

    Patient Participation Group Newsletter

    Summer 2019 Edition Patient Participation Group Newsletter Your Practice (Waterfoot Medical Practice) We’re changing our name! With new GP partners coming on board at the practice we have decided it’s time for a name change. In consultation with our Patient Participation Group we decided not to stray too far from our current name of Waterfoot Group of Doctors and are opting for Waterfoot Medical Practice. Waterfoot Wildflower Meadow You may have noticed the grass around Waterfoot Medical Practice is being left to grow this summer. This is to encourage the wild flowers to grow for the benefit of the local wildlife, our patients and our staff. We will be managing this area with a yearly cut in early September. The cut grass will then be seeded with a plant called Yellow Rattle and we expect a flower filled meadow to develop over the next few years. If you would like any further information, or you would like to help with the development of the meadow, please get in touch with us at the surgery. Keeping Active Over the summer months our Doctors have been busy taking part in physical challenges, and all for a good cause. On 23rd June Dr Narayan took part in the Big NHS Walk where NHS Trust staff and the local community walked 12 miles whilst raising as much money as possible for our local hospitals. Dr Hinchliffe took on the Race for Life Pretty Muddy on 13th July to raise money for cancer research. This involved racing her way through 5km of muddy obstacles.
  • Land at Newchurch Road Stacksteads Preliminary

    Land at Newchurch Road Stacksteads Preliminary

    LAND AT NEWCHURCH ROAD STACKSTEADS PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT (PHASE 1 DESK STUDY) Prepared for: Mr T Celiz 9 Newby Road Bolton Lancashire BL2 5EQ By: LK Consult Ltd Bury Business Centre Kay Street Bury Lancashire BL9 6BU th Date: 12 April 2013 Ref: LKC 13 1066 Mr T Celiz Land at Newchurch Road, Stacksteads LK Consult Ltd Document Verification Land at Newchurch Road, Stacksteads, Bacup, Lancashire, OL13 Site Address 0LD Report Title Preliminary Risk Assessment Job Number LKC 13 1066 Document Ref. CL-602-LKC 13 1066-01 Date Issued 12th April 2013 Report Version R0 Prepared By Rachel Peart Signature Reviewed By Catherine Baranek Signature Disclaimer This report has been prepared by LKC who have exercised such professional skill, care and diligence as may reasonably be expected of a properly qualified and competent consultant experienced in preparing reports of a similar scope. However, to the extent that the report is based on or relies upon information contained in records, reports or other materials provided to LKC which have not been independently produced or verified, LKC gives no warranty, representation or assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. This report is prepared solely for the benefit of Mr T Celiz. It may not be relied upon by, or submitted to a third party for their reliance for the purposes of valuation, mortgage, insurance and regulatory approval, until all invoices have been settled in full. Those using this information in subsequent assessments or evaluations do so at their own risk. LK Consult
  • Rossendale What Is Going to Happen?

    Rossendale What Is Going to Happen?

    M unction ClaytonleMoors Hapton Moorfield Industrial Estate Lane Ends M A Huncoat Primary School uarry Enfield Rd Higher Gate A79 Huncoat Road Bolton Ave Oakhurst Whinney Hill Rd Ave unction Altham West Huncoat M Business Park Church Burnley Rd Accrington Cemetery & A0 Cremetorium Deer Park A Foxwood Chase EY ueen’s Rd Proposed traffic route The Compound A79 Coppice Church Haul road Tunnel route Railway Accrington A0 Scaitcliffe Haslingden & Walmersley Tunnel Section Rossendale Haslingden Rawtenstall All Saints What is going to happen? High Haslingden Rd School Haslingden Road Compound A0 Haslingden Road River Irwell A tunnelling compound where the Tunnel A Compound Flax Moss Tesco New Hall Hey Boring Machine will start constructing the superstore New Hall Hey Bent Gate A2 Compound route of the new pipeline. From here the B2 route runs north to Huncoat, Hyndburn, Holme Townsend Fold Lane WTW Compound and south to Bury. There will also be a Haslingden Cricket Club Townsend new small pipeline to Townsend Fold Tor Fold Helmshore View WTW. We will be working in this area B2 for approximately six years. Access to Rossendale Bury Rd the Haslingden Road Compound will be Golf Club Manchester Rd from the A680 Manchester Road and B24 Horncliffe Mansion some of our traffic may leave the site A onto Haslingden Road. Rossendale Wastewater FishLane Rake The typical number of vehicle movements Treatment Works EY to and from the Haslingden Road compound B2 will be between five and 15 per hour, though B24 Proposed traffic route – Haslingden Road Compound during the four years that tunnelling is Irwell Vale Proposed traffic route – underway this may peak at 25 per hour.
  • 273 the Monday to Friday Journey at 1705 from Bolton Has Been Retimed to Run 273 5 Minutes Later Easy Access on All Buses

    273 the Monday to Friday Journey at 1705 from Bolton Has Been Retimed to Run 273 5 Minutes Later Easy Access on All Buses

    From 27 January Bus 273 The Monday to Friday journey at 1705 from Bolton has been retimed to run 273 5 minutes later Easy access on all buses Rawtenstall Edenfield Stubbins Ramsbottom Holcombe Brook Hawkshaw Walves Bradshaw Tonge Moor Bolton From 27 January 2019 For public transport information phone 0161 244 1000 7am – 8pm Mon to Fri 8am – 8pm Sat, Sun & public holidays This timetable is available online at Operated by www.tfgm.com Rosso PO Box 429, Manchester, M1 3BG ©Transport for Greater Manchester 18-1930–G273–2500–1218 Additional information Alternative format Operator details To ask for leaflets to be sent to you, or to request Rosso large print, Braille or recorded information Queensgate Depot, phone 0161 244 1000 or visit www.tfgm.com Colne Road, Burnley Easy access on buses BB10 1HH Telephone 01706 390 520 Journeys run with low floor buses have no email: [email protected] steps at the entrance, making getting on and off easier. Where shown, low floor buses have a ramp for access and a dedicated Travelshops space for wheelchairs and pushchairs inside the Bolton Interchange bus. The bus operator will always try to provide Mon to Fri 7am to 5.30pm easy access services where these services are Saturday 8am to 5.30pm scheduled to run. Sunday* Closed Bury Interchange Using this timetable Mon to Fri 7am to 5.30pm Timetables show the direction of travel, bus Saturday 8am to 5.30pm numbers and the days of the week. Sunday* Closed Main stops on the route are listed on the left.
  • Buses Serving Bacup & Rawtenstall Grammar School from September

    Buses Serving Bacup & Rawtenstall Grammar School from September

    Buses serving Bacup & Rawtenstall Grammar School From September 2014 HASLINGDEN – HELMSHORE – RAWTENSTALL – WATERFOOT 244 WATERFOOT – RAWTENSTALL – HELMSHORE – HASLINGDEN 245 Service Number 244 Service Number 245 BLACKBURN Bus Station 0726 WATERFOOT opp. Townsend Street 1520 HASLINGDEN Manchester Rd 0757 RAWTENSTALL Bus Station 1530 Helmshore, Broadway (Post Office) 0801 Helmshore Road / Gregory Fold 1538 RAWTENSTALL Bacup Rd 0810 HASLINGDEN Manchester Rd 1543 WATERFOOT Bus Turning Circle 0817 ACCRINGTON Bus Station 1600 For more information about buses between Accrington, Haslingden, Rawtenstall & Waterfoot, see service 464. ROCHDALE – WHITWORTH – BACUP –WATEFOOT 464 WATERFOOT – BACUP – WHITWORTH – ROCHDALE 464 Buses operate at regular intervals throughout the day (at least every 10 minutes in the morning peak period and with additional journeys at schooltimes in the afternoon. Check rossobus.com for more details ACCRINGTON –HASLINGDEN – RAWTENSTALL – WATERFOOT 464 WATERFOOT – RAWTENSTALL – HASLINGDEN – ACCRINGTON 464 Buses operate at regular intervals throughout the day with additional journeys at schooltimes. Check rossobus.com for more details TODMORDEN – BACUP – WATERFOOT 465 WATERFOOT – BACUP – TODMORDEN 465 Service Number 465 Service Number 465 TODMORDEN Bus Station 0751 RAWTENSTALL Bus Station 1545 Cloughfoot 0800 WATERFOOT Turning Circle for BRGS 1551 Sharneyford 0804 Rook Hill Road 1555 BACUP St James Gardens 0811 Britannia 1602 Britannia 0816 BACUP St James’ Gardens 1608 Rook Hill Road 0822 Sharneyford 1611 WATERFOOT Jolly
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England

    Local Government Boundary Commission for England

    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF GREATER MANCHESTER THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF BURY Boundaries with:- THE CITIES OF MANCHESTER and SALFORD. BLACKBURN and ROSSENDALE in LANCASHIRE ROSSENDALE BLACKBURN MANCHESTER SALFORD REPORT NO. 649 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 649 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN MR K F J ENNALS CB MEMBERS MR G R PRENTICE MRS H R V SARKANY MR C W SMITH PROFESSOR K YOUNG SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF GREATER MANCHESTER THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF BURY AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH THE CITIES OF MANCHESTER AND SALFORD IN GREATER MANCHESTER, AND THE BOROUGHS OF BLACKBURN AND ROSSENDALE IN LANCASHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1 . This report contains our final proposals for the Metropolitan Borough of Bury and its boundaries with the Cities of Manchester and Salford in Greater Manchester, and the Boroughs of Blackburn and Rossendale in Lancashire. Bury's boundaries with Bolton and Rochdale were considered in the context of our review of those metropolitan districts, on which we have already reported to you (Report Numbers 591 and 584 respectively). 2. We are making no proposals for radical change but are making a series of minor proposals to remove anomalies, such as the division of properties by local authority boundaries. Our report explains how we arrived at our proposals. ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE START OF THE REVIEW 3. On 1 September 1987, we announced the start of a review of the Metropolitan Borough of Bury as part of our review of the Metropolitan County of Greater Manchester and its Metropolitan Districts under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972.
  • Rossendale Local Plan Flood Risk Incorporating Sequential Test Topic Paper

    Rossendale Local Plan Flood Risk Incorporating Sequential Test Topic Paper

    ROSSENDALE LOCAL PLAN FLOOD RISK INCORPORATING SEQUENTIAL TEST TOPIC PAPER March 2019 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 National Context ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Regional / Local context .......................................................................................................... 8 3 Evidence base................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) ............................................................................... 10 3.2 Sustainability Appraisal (SA) ................................................................................................. 12 4 Applying the Sequential Test ........................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Site allocations ...................................................................................................................... 12 Proposed allocations in flood zone 1 ................................................................................................ 13 Proposed allocations in flood zone 2 ...............................................................................................
  • Environmental Baseline Report PDF 642 KB

    Environmental Baseline Report PDF 642 KB

    July 2013 Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report – Environmental Baseline Report 1 Local Flood Risk Management Strategy SEA Environmental Baseline The collection and review of baseline information is a crucial part of the SEA process. It is essential to gather sufficient baseline information on the current and likely future state of the environment in order to be able to adequately predict and assess the significant effects of a plan. The data collected to characterise the evidence base for the SEA of the strategy has been derived from numerous secondary sources and no new investigations or surveys have been undertaken as part of the scoping process. The information presented in this Scoping Report represents an outline of the evidence base by environmental topics. It may be necessary to collect further data against which to assess the potential environmental effects of the LFRMS with regard to monitoring requirements. 2 1 Introduction 1.1 The Borough of Bury is located in the North West of England, situated within the Greater Manchester metropolitan area. As an integral part of Greater Manchester, Bury has an important role to play in accommodating the spatial priorities for the North West region. Bury also has strong links with parts of Lancashire located, towards the north, via the M66 corridor and Irwell Valley. Bury is bounded to the south by the authorities of Manchester and Salford, to the east by Rochdale, to the west by Bolton and to the north by Rossendale and Blackburn and Darwen. 1.2 Bury benefits from good transport links with the rest of Greater Manchester and beyond, which has led to the Borough’s attractiveness as a commuter area.
  • Environmental Statement Main Text Volume 1 Proposed Three Wind

    Environmental Statement Main Text Volume 1 Proposed Three Wind

    ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT MAIN TEXT VOLUME 1 PROPOSED THREE WIND TURBINES ON LAND ADJACENT TO HAMELDON HILL WIND FARM May 2016 1 Environmental Statement This Environmental Statement (ES) is prepared for the submission for planning approval of three wind turbines on land adjacent to the Hameldon Hill Wind Farm. The statement is prepared by AAH Planning Consultants with contributions from: Copies of the ES can be obtained either through downloading from the website www.hameldonhillwindfarm.com or by contacting: AAH Planning Consultants, 2 Bar Lane, York, YO1 6JU Tel: 01904 629258 Email: [email protected] The cost of printing for paper copies will be charged at cost price to cover the cost incurred for printing and postage. DVD versions can also be provided at a cost of £10. Paper copies will also be available for public viewing at Burnley Borough Council’s planning department at Housing and Development Control, Contact Centre, 9 Parker Lane, Burnley, BB11 2BY during the following office hours: 9am to 5pm Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday 10am to 5pm on Wednesdays The Non-Technical Summary of the ES is also available free of charge upon request and again available for download from the above mentioned website. 2 Contents 1.0 Introduction to the Proposal ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Approach to Environmental Assessment .................................................................................... 5 3.0 Site Description ........................................................................................................................
  • Item B2 Application 2005/519 Kearns Mill Cowpe

    Item B2 Application 2005/519 Kearns Mill Cowpe

    ITEM B2 TITLE: APPLICATION 2005/519 CONVERSION/EXTENSION OF MILL BUILDING B TO CREATE 18 APARTMENTS, DEMOLITION OF OTHER BUILDINGS AND ERECTION OF 28 HOUSES KEARNS MILL, COWPE ROAD, COWPE TO/ON: DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE - 6 DECEMBER 2005 BY: TEAM MANAGER DEVELOPMENT CONTROL APPLICANT : HURSTWOODS DEVELOPMENTS DETERMINATION EXPIRY DATE : 2 DECEMBER 2005 Human Rights The relevant provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights have been taken into account in the preparation of this report, particularly the implications arising from the following rights: - Article 8 The right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence. Article 1 of Protocol 1 The right of peaceful enjoyment of possessions and protection of property. Site This application relates to a site of approx 1.8ha in area at the head of Cowpe Brook valley. The site is occupied by a series of traditional stone-built mill buildings, with later alterations/additions and other ancillary buildings, totalling 10,300 sq m of floorspace. Besides these buildings, which vary in height up to 3-storeys, there is a 50m high chimney stack and a lodge which occupies broadly a third of the site. This complex is prominent as viewed from Cowpe Road, to which the application site has a 300m frontage on the north side, from a lane running along its west side and from the rising open land around it. From the lodge flows a watercourse which is for the most part culverted as it runs through the application site, with Mill Building B bridging over it.
  • X41 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    X41 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    X41 bus time schedule & line map X41 Accrington - Manchester Via Haslingden, View In Website Mode Helmshore, Ramsbottom, Prestwich The X41 bus line (Accrington - Manchester Via Haslingden, Helmshore, Ramsbottom, Prestwich) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Accrington: 7:04 AM - 9:05 PM (2) Manchester City Centre: 5:38 AM - 7:43 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest X41 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next X41 bus arriving. Direction: Accrington X41 bus Time Schedule 72 stops Accrington Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 9:45 AM - 6:45 PM Monday 7:04 AM - 9:05 PM Chorlton Street, Manchester City Centre Tuesday 7:04 AM - 9:05 PM Arora Hotel, Manchester City Centre 18-24 Princess Street, Manchester Wednesday 7:04 AM - 9:05 PM St James Square, Manchester City Centre Thursday 7:04 AM - 9:05 PM John Dalton Street, Manchester Friday 7:04 AM - 11:05 PM Victoria Bridge Street, Salford Saturday 8:10 AM - 11:05 PM Chapel Street, Manchester Strangeways Barker Street, Manchester X41 bus Info Bury New Road, Strangeways Direction: Accrington Bury New Road, Manchester Stops: 72 Trip Duration: 79 min Bury New Road, Strangeways Line Summary: Chorlton Street, Manchester City Centre, Arora Hotel, Manchester City Centre, St Appian Way, Lower Broughton James Square, Manchester City Centre, Victoria Bridge Street, Salford, Strangeways, Bury New Road, Great Cheetham Street West, Higher Broughton Strangeways, Bury New Road, Strangeways, Appian Vinca Grove, Manchester Way, Lower Broughton, Great Cheetham
  • Bury but Better Report

    Bury but Better Report

    Bury Town Centre: Vision and development strategy Report by: URBED with King Sturge, TPP and JRUD Bury but better Town Centre Vision and Development Strategy - Consultation Draft - A report for... Bury Metropolitan Borough Council by... URBED with King Sturge, TPP and JRUD March 2003 110. 111. Bury but better Town Centre Vision and Development Strategy - Consultation Draft - A report for... Contents Bury Metropolitan Borough Council Page by... Part 1 Context URBED with King Sturge, TPP 1 Introduction 1 and JRUD 2 A renaissance vision 3 3 The study approach 5 March 2003 4 Bury in the past 7 5 Bury today 11 Part 2 Urban Design Analysis 15 6 The structure of the town 17 7 The public realm of the town centre 19 8 Townscape assessment 27 Part 3 Economic Analysis 35 9 Market assessment 37 URBED 10 Town centre health check 49 10 Little Lever Street MANCHESTER Part 4 Transport Analysis 57 M1 1HR 11 Access to the town centre 59 t. 0161 200 5500 Part 5 Vision and strategy 67 [email protected] 12 Towards a vision - SWOT analysis 69 13 Towards a vision - Bury but better 75 14 Development Strategy 79 15 Towards a masterplan - process and principles 87 16 Towards a masterplan - quarters 94 TPP 17 Next Steps 105 Report by: URBED with King Sturge, TPP and JRUD Introduction 1. Bury but better ment interests to the benefit of the town. This study will, therefore, be useful in negotiations with these developers - indeed discussions with This report was commissioned by Bury Council the developers have been ongoing throughout to develop a vision and strategy for the town the study period.