Presidential Election in Egypt, May–June 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Presidential Election in Egypt, May–June 2012 Presidential Election in Egypt Final Report May–June 2012 Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. The Carter Center strives to relieve suffering by advancing peace and health worldwide; it seeks to prevent and resolve conflicts, enhance freedom and democracy, and protect and promote human rights worldwide. Presidential Election in Egypt Final Report May–June 2012 One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center The Carter Center Contents Executive Summary .........................2 The Media Environment and Postelection Developments ...................2 Access to the Electoral Process...............43 The Carter Center and the Presidential Election ...3 Participation of Women .....................45 Historical and Political Background ............6 Civil Society Organizations . 47 The Timing and the Role of the Regulatory Framework for CSOs .............47 Presidential Election in the Broader The Role of CSOs in Witnessing the Political Transition .........................6 Presidential Election .......................48 Political Maneuvering and the Candidate Additional Challenges Facing Domestic Nomination Process ........................9 CSOs in Witnessing the Election .............49 The First Round of the Presidential Out-of-Country Voting .....................51 Election: May 23–24, 2012 ..................9 Political Developments Between the Election Day ..............................52 First and Second Rounds of the Election ........11 Poll Opening ............................52 The Second Round of the Election: Polling and Voting Operations ...............53 June 16–17, 2012 ........................12 Closing .................................56 The Carter Center in Egypt .................14 Counting and Aggregation ...................58 Observation Methodology ...................14 Aggregation .............................59 Limitations on Witnessing the Announcement of Election Results ...........61 Presidential Election .......................16 Observing the Presidential Election ............17 Electoral Dispute Resolution.................64 Electoral Institutions and the Legal Conclusions and Recommendations . .67 Framework for the Presidential Election .......18 To the Government of Egypt ................67 Legal Framework .........................18 To the Presidential Election Commission. .69 Key Issues ..............................20 Appendix A: Acknowledgments . 75 Electoral System ..........................25 Appendix B: The Carter Center Election Management ......................25 Witnessing Delegation and Staff ..............77 Presidential Election Commission .............27 Appendix C: Terms and Abbreviations ........80 Voter Registration .........................29 Appendix D: Statements . 81 Voter Education ...........................32 Appendix E: Deployment Plans .............100 Candidates and Campaigns ..................34 Appendix F: Checklists . 101 Candidate Nomination .....................34 Appendix G: Letters of Permission ..........124 Regulatory Framework for Campaigning ........36 Security Environment During the Appendix H: Constitutional First-Round Campaign Period ...............37 Declaration Addendum ....................126 Campaigning During the Second Round ........38 The Carter Center at a Glance ..............129 Campaigning During the Silence Period ........40 Campaign Finance ........................40 The Carter Center Executive Summary gypt’s historic 2012 presidential election was in force at the time. Finally, the timeline for drafting the first time Egypt’s head of state would be a new constitution hung in the balance as the final Edirectly elected by the people in a competi- composition of the constituent assembly formed to tive election that included candidates representing draft it had not been resolved. diverse political platforms and where the outcome On June 17, shortly after the polls closed for was genuinely unknown. The presidential election the runoff phase of the election, the SCAF issued on May 23–24, 2012, and the runoff on June 16–17, a controversial addendum to the Constitutional 2012, also marked at least1 the fourth and fifth times, Declaration. In it, it granted to itself the legislative respectively, that Egyptians were called to the polls powers of the recently dissolved People’s Assembly — in little over a year. However, while there was con- as well as key powers previously held by the Egyptian siderable enthusiasm for the electoral process, it was president — and formalized the military council as marred by uncertainty about the broader transition a governing institution within the constitutional overseen by the Supreme Council of the Armed framework. Furthermore, the SCAF inserted itself Forces (SCAF). The paramount question in the lead- into the constitution drafting process by giving itself up to the election was whether this electoral process the powers to appoint a constituent assembly in the event the assembly was unable to fulfill its duties. It also gave itself veto power over content in a future-draft constitution. Following the June 17 constitutional addendum, Maurice Chammah The Carter Center continued to express grave concerns about the increasing ambiguity of the SCAF-led transition and the meaning and purpose of the presidential election within this context. Ultimately, the election produced Egypt’s first democratically elected civilian president, Mohamed Morsi — a significant milestone in the wake of the January 2011 popular uprising. It did not, however, Former Yemeni Prime Minister Abdul Karim Al-Eryani greets signal the conclusion to the transfer of power from voters standing in a queue during the runoff election on the military to an elected civilian government as June 16, 2012. previously promised by the military council. Postelection Developments would, in fact, result in a full transfer of power from On Aug. 12, after only 43 days in office, newly the military to a civilian-led government by June 30, elected President Morsi took a series of dramatic steps 2012, as the military council had indicated. that included replacing top members of the SCAF’s Another equally important question was the degree to which the powers of the new president would be balanced vis-á-vis other state institutions as they were 1 In some cases, Egyptians may have voted up to nine times in a little largely undefined in the Constitutional Declaration over a year as a result of runoff and rerun elections during election for the People’s Assembly and the Shura Council. 2 The Carter Center Presidential Election in Egypt senior leadership as well as replacing the June 17 The Carter Center and the constitutional addendum with a new addendum. Presidential Election President Morsi’s addendum effectively fully restored the executive office of the presidency, granted The Carter Center was present for both rounds of legislative powers to the president in the absence the presidential election. However, its mission to of a People’s Assembly, and allowed the president witness the election was limited in scope due to to appoint a new constituent assembly to draft a restrictions imposed on election witnesses by Egypt’s constitution should the current assembly be prevented electoral authorities. The Carter Center election from performing its duties. While these moves will witnessing mission in Egypt was accredited by the undoubtedly have a lasting impact on the future role Presidential Election Commission (PEC) on May 3, of the military in formal politics and Egypt’s struggle 2012. Accreditation badges, necessary for witnesses to produce a civilian-led government, they do not to observe the process, were provided on May 16, change the fundamental problem that has continued less than seven days before the first round of the to plague Egypt’s transition from the start: the lack of presidential election. In addition to the delayed issu- a constitution that protects fundamental rights and ance of accreditation badges, witnessing regulations ensures checks and balances of power. included a provision that witnessing missions could President Morsi has asked the Egyptian people to not issue statements prior to polling, and it imposed place their trust in him to deliver on the longer-term a 30-minute time restriction on witnesses’ presence goals of the popular uprising, which include building inside polling stations and prohibited witnessing the the foundation for genuinely democratic politics. It final aggregation of the results. is incumbent upon newly elected President Morsi to Due to these restrictions imposed upon election do everything in his power to move Egypt toward a witnesses by Egypt’s electoral authorities, the Center greater stability by laying this foundation. This can was unable to assess critical pre-election phases, be done by ensuring an inclusive and transparent including voter registration, candidate nomination, constitutional drafting process by a constituent assembly that enjoys popular legitimacy and is afforded the opportunity for full Deborah Hakes and complete debate and discourse on the content of the constitu- tion and Egypt’s political future. In addition, President Morsi must turn over legislative power to a democratically elected parliament as soon as possible. Finally, the success of the transition will require guaranteed respect for and protec- tion of the fundamental civil and political rights of all Egyptians by a democratically elected, civilian government.
Recommended publications
  • The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who They Are and How American News Media Gets It Wrong
    Jeremy Abrams The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who they are and How American News Media Gets it Wrong Jeremy Abrams 1 Table of Content I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 II. Defining Political Parties and their Role in Democracies ................................................................. 2 A. Generally ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 B. Structurally .................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. How the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood Fit the Mold ................................................. 4 III. Brief Descriptions of the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood ............................................. 4 A. The Tea Party ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. History ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The System in Which it Operates ..................................................................................................... 9 3. Official Status ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Struggle for Citizenship
    OCTOBER 2017 Women’s Struggle for Citizenship: Civil Society and Constitution Making after the Arab Uprisings JOSÉ S. VERICAT Cover Photo: Marchers on International ABOUT THE AUTHORS Women’s Day, Cairo, Egypt, March 8, 2011. Al Jazeera English. JOSÉ S. VERICAT is an Adviser at the International Peace Institute. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper represent those of the author Email: [email protected] and not necessarily those of the International Peace Institute. IPI welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit of ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS a well-informed debate on critical policies and issues in international The author would like to thank Mohamed Elagati and affairs. Nidhal Mekki for their useful feedback. This project would not have seen the light of day without the input of dozens IPI Publications of civil society activists from Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen, as Adam Lupel, Vice President well as several from Libya and Syria, who believed in its Albert Trithart, Associate Editor value and selflessly invested their time and energy into it. Madeline Brennan, Assistant Production Editor To them IPI is very grateful. Within IPI, Amal al-Ashtal and Waleed al-Hariri provided vital support at different stages Suggested Citation: of the project’s execution. José S. Vericat, “Women’s Struggle for Citizenship: Civil Society and IPI owes a debt of gratitude to its many donors for their Constitution Making after the Arab generous support. In particular, IPI would like to thank the Uprisings,” New York: International governments of Finland and Norway for making this Peace Institute, October 2017. publication possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Down and Out: Founding Elections and Disillusionment with Democracy in Egypt and Tunisia
    Down and Out: Founding Elections and Disillusionment with Democracy in Egypt and Tunisia Sharan Grewal and Steve L. Monroe Forthcoming, Comparative Politics Which electoral losers become the most disillusioned with democracy following the first free and fair elections? Exploiting surveys before and after founding elections in post-Arab Spring Egypt and Tunisia, we find that the most disillusioned losers were those residing in areas where the losing parties were strongest. We argue that expectations matter. Losers whose parties are strong locally tend to overestimate their popularity nationally and thus become more disillusioned after the first elections. Beyond these attitudinal results, we find that these areas witnessed a greater increase in support for candidates from former autocratic regimes in subsequent elections. These findings clarify subnational variation in electoral losers’ attitudes towards democracy. They suggest that decentralization may keep otherwise disillusioned losers invested in democracy. 1 “She was in a state of shock and confusion. [...] It was one thing for the [Muslim] Brotherhood to win close to 40 percent, but how could 28 percent of her countrymen vote for ultraconservative Salafi parties? [...] She mourned not only for what she feared Egypt might become, but for a country that she could no longer recognize, a country that was no longer really hers. It raised the question: was [democracy] worth it? For liberals like [her], it apparently wasn’t.”1 How citizens respond to electoral loss is critical to the success of democratic transitions.2 Supporters of losing parties in founding elections must opt to remain within the democratic system for a nascent democracy to take root.
    [Show full text]
  • “Text 'Revolution' to Vote”: Social Media's Effect on Popular Consent and Legitimacy of New Regimes
    GREGGMACROED (DO NOT DELETE) 8/14/2020 11:18 AM “TEXT ‘REVOLUTION’ TO VOTE”: SOCIAL MEDIA’S EFFECT ON POPULAR CONSENT AND LEGITIMACY OF NEW REGIMES KEVIN GREGG* ABSTRACT ................................................................................................. 315 I.INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 316 II.LEGAL CRITERION FOR EXTRA-CONSTITUTIONAL REGIME LEGITIMACY ................................................................................... 317 A. The Grundnorm ....................................................................... 317 B. Determining the Legitimacy of New Revolutionary Regimes .................................................................................. 319 1. Effective Control Theories ................................................ 319 2. The Democratic Entitlement Theory ................................. 320 3. United Nations Practice..................................................... 321 4. Popular Consent ................................................................ 322 III.DETERMINING POPULAR CONSENT THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA ............ 323 A. Popular Consent and Democracy ............................................ 323 1. The Growing Importance of Popular Consent .................. 324 2. Short-Term Exception: The Doctrine of Necessity ........... 324 B. Social Media and the Manifestation of Popular Consent ........ 325 1. Social Media Today .......................................................... 326 2. Social Media, Politics,
    [Show full text]
  • 23–24 November 2012 Bibliotheca Alexandrina
    Women and Democratic Transition in Egypt Dialogue Forum Report 23–24 November 2012 Bibliotheca Alexandrina Center for Democracy and Social Peace Studies (CDSPS), Bibliotheca Alexandrina The Egyptian Feminist Union PeaceWomen Across the Globe (PWAG) CONTENTS Foreword..............................................................................................................................................5 Introduction....................................................................................................................................7 Opening Session......................................................................................................................9 Session One................................................................................................................................13 Session Two................................................................................................................................19 Session Three..........................................................................................................................27 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................37 ANNEXES Annex 1. Participants.................................................................................................39 Annex 2. Program...........................................................................................................44 Annex 3. About PeaceWomen Across the Globe............46
    [Show full text]
  • Petition To: United Nations Working
    PETITION TO: UNITED NATIONS WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION Mr Mads Andenas (Norway) Mr José Guevara (Mexico) Ms Shaheen Ali (Pakistan) Mr Sètondji Adjovi (Benin) Mr Vladimir Tochilovsky (Ukraine) HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY COPY TO: UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF OPINION AND EXPRESSION, MR DAVID KAYE; UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHTS TO FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY AND OF ASSOCIATION, MR MAINA KIAI; UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS, MR MICHEL FORST. in the matter of Alaa Abd El Fattah (the “Petitioner”) v. Egypt _______________________________________ Petition for Relief Pursuant to Commission on Human Rights Resolutions 1997/50, 2000/36, 2003/31, and Human Rights Council Resolutions 6/4 and 15/1 Submitted by: Media Legal Defence Initiative Electronic Frontier Foundation The Grayston Centre 815 Eddy Street 28 Charles Square San Francisco CA 94109 London N1 6HT BASIS FOR REQUEST The Petitioner is a citizen of the Arab Republic of Egypt (“Egypt”), which acceded to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”) on 14 January 1982. 1 The Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt 2014 (the “Constitution”) states that Egypt shall be bound by the international human rights agreements, covenants and conventions it has ratified, which shall have the force of law after publication in accordance with the conditions set out in the Constitution. 2 Egypt is also bound by those principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”) that have acquired the status of customary international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Presidential Election Observation Report
    EGYPT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OBSERVATION REPORT JULY 2014 This publication was produced by Democracy International, Inc., for the United States Agency for International Development through Cooperative Agreement No. 3263-A- 13-00002. Photographs in this report were taken by DI while conducting the mission. Democracy International, Inc. 7600 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1010 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: +1.301.961.1660 www.democracyinternational.com EGYPT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OBSERVATION REPORT July 2014 Disclaimer This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Democracy International, Inc. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................ 4 MAP OF EGYPT .......................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................. II DELEGATION MEMBERS ......................................... V ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................... X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 6 ABOUT DI .......................................................... 6 ABOUT THE MISSION ....................................... 7 METHODOLOGY .............................................. 8 BACKGROUND ........................................................ 10 TUMULT
    [Show full text]
  • MENA Women: Opportunities and Obstacles in 2014
    MENA Women: Opportunities and Obstacles in 2014 In Celebration of International Women’s Day 2014 Women’s Voices from Around the World Edited by Kendra Heideman, Mona Youssef, and William Drumheller Designed by Kendra Heideman 0 * * * * * * * * * * * Table of Contents Haleh Esfandiari (United States) 1 Dalia Fahmy (Egypt) 21 Haifa Abu Ghazaleh (Jordan) 2 Hanin Ghaddar (Lebanon) 22 Raya Abu Gulal (Iraq) 3 Lina Hundaileh (Jordan) 23 Raghda Abu-Shahla (Gaza) 4 Farahnaz Ispahani (Pakistan) 24 Muna AbuSulayman (Saudi Arabia) 5 Hind Aboud Kabawat (Syria) 25 Wajeeha Al-Baharna (Bahrain) 6 Sema Kalaycioglu (Turkey) 26 Hala Al Dosari (Saudi Arabia) 7 Moushira Khattab (Egypt) 27 Fahmia Al Fotih (Yemen) 8 Lilia Labidi (Tunisia) 28 Sultana Al-Jeham (Yemen) 9 Jaleh Lackner-Gohari (Austria) 29 Eman Alnafjan (Saudi Arabia) 9 Amal Mudallali (Lebanon) 31 Rend Al Rahim (Iraq) 10 Musdah Mulia (Indonesia) 32 Safia Al Souhail (Iraq) 11 Caryle Murphy (United States) 33 Sanam Anderlini (United Kingdom/Iran) 12 Marina Ottaway (United States) 33 Ferdous Ara Begum (Bangladesh) 13 Smadar Perry (Israel) 35 Margot Badran (United States) 14 Hanan Saab (Lebanon) 36 Kahina Bouagache (Algeria) 15 Fatima Sadiqi (Morocco) 37 Nadereh Chamlou (United States) 16 Fatima Sbaity Kassem (Lebanon) 38 Ümit Cizre (Turkey) 17 Edit Schlaffer (Austria) 39 Isobel Coleman (United States) 18 Tara Sonenshine (United States) 40 Rangita de Silva de Alwis (United States) 19 Nayereh Tohidi (United States) 41 Yassmine ElSayed Hani (Egypt) 20 Robin Wright (United States) 43 Amal Hassan Fadlalla (Sudan/U.S.) 21 Najat Zarrouk (Morocco) 44 Haleh Esfandiari, Director, Middle East Program, Woodrow Wilson Center 2014 began with a number of auspicious developments for women in the region: the ratification of the Tunisian Constitution by the National Constituent Assembly in January and the approval of the amended Egyptian Constitution of 2012 by referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • News Coverage Prepared For: the European Union Delegation to Egypt
    News Coverage prepared for: The European Union delegation to Egypt . Disclaimer: “This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of authors of articles and under no circumstances are regarded as reflecting the position of IPSOS or the European Union.” 1 . Thematic Headlines Domestic Scene Egyptians in Greece Call for Sacking Envoy Protesters Prevent PM from Exiting Ministry Premises 103,000 Egyptian Expats Vote in 2nd Phase of Elections Sabahi: I Will Stand Against Israel to Protect Palestinian Rights Court to Examine 200 Complaints to Nullify Elections in Cairo, Halt Them in Giza Presidential Hopeful Abu-Ismail: US Contact Huge Victory to Islamists FJP: The Constituent Assembly Hands Cuffs the Parliament Mubarak’s Wealth Advisory Council Holds Its First Meeting El-Ganzouri: The Economic Situation Is Devastating Hatata: SCAF Has No Political Experience SCAF Denies Mulla’s Statement Interior Minister Meets 1000 Officers Elections Updates in Al-Masry Al-Youm newspaper. Elections Updates in Al-Tahrir newspaper. MB Guide to Members: Be Modest and Remove Copts’ Fears Investigations of Mohamed Mahmoud Clashes Start within Days General Elections Updates in al-Ahram First Phase Polls Results Annulled in Alexandria’s Third Constituency Al-Nour Calls Cooperation with Freedom and Justice Field Marshal Tantawi visits Tahrir Square Ahmad Zwel Meets Field Marshal Tantawi Elections Updates in al-Akhbar Israel’s Ambassador Arrives Today The Egyptian Mufti is Number 12 on the List of the World’s Most Influential People Sharaf Apologizes 2 Newspapers (12/12/2011) Page: 1 Author: Muhammad Anz Al-Nour Calls Cooperation with Freedom and Justice Liberal parties coordinated to support 51 candidates in the second phase of the elections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Political Parties in Promoting a Culture of Good Governance in Egypt Post-2011
    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 6-1-2015 The role of political parties in promoting a culture of good governance in Egypt post-2011 Omar Kandil Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation Kandil, O. (2015).The role of political parties in promoting a culture of good governance in Egypt post-2011 [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/60 MLA Citation Kandil, Omar. The role of political parties in promoting a culture of good governance in Egypt post-2011. 2015. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/60 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The American University in Cairo The School of Global Affairs and Public Policy The Role of Political Parties in Promoting a Culture of Good Governance in Egypt Post-2011 A Thesis Submitted to the Public Policy and Administration Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts By Omar Kandil Supervised by Dr. Amr Hamzawy Professor , Public Policy and Administration, AUC Dr. Lisa Anderson President, AUC Dr. Hamid Ali Associate Professor & Chair, Public Policy and Administration, AUC Spring 2015 1 Acknowledgements There are a few people without which it would have been impossible for me to finish this piece of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Environmental Sector Assessment Final Report Volume II
    Egypt Environmental Sector Assessment Final report Volume II March 1998 for USAID/Cairo EPIQ International Resources Group, Prime Contractor Task order no. OUT-PCE-8-802-96-00002-00 Contract no. PCE-I-00-96-00002-00 This title page was copied by the cataloger from the paper original Contents Volume II Acronyms ............................................... ii Annex Page A. Scope of Work .................................... A.1 B. The Role of Non-governmental Organizations .............. B.1 in the Environmental Field C. Project Profiles .................................... C.1 Assistance Project Summaries .......................... C.1 Legal/ Institutional Project Profiles ...................... C.5 Industrial Pollution Project Profiles ......................C.12 Solid Waste Management Project Profiles ..................C.38 Energy/Energy Efficiency Project Profiles .................C.51 Environmentally Sustainable Tourism Project Profiles .........C.80 D. Donor Assistance to the Egyptian Environmental Sector ........ D.1 E. Participation Panel Meetings ............................E.1 F. Policy Roundtables ..................................F.1 G. List of Meetings and Field Trips ........................ G.1 -1- List of Acronyms AEDC Alexandria Electricity Distribution Company AEEC Association of Enterprises for Environmental Conservation AGOSD Alexandria General Organization for Sanitary Drainage ARCE American Research Center in Egypt CAP Compliance Action Plan CEOSS Coptic Evangelical Organization for Social Services CIDA Canadian International
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangerous Rise of Populism Global Attacks on Human Rights Values
    The Dangerous Rise of Populism Global Attacks on Human Rights Values By Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch Human rights exist to protect people from government abuse and neglect. Rights limit what a state can do and impose obligations for how a state must act. Yet today a new generation of populists is turning this protection on its head. Claiming to speak for “the people,” they treat rights as an impediment to their conception of the majority will, a needless obstacle to defending the nation from perceived threats and evils. Instead of accepting rights as protecting everyone, they privilege the declared interests of the majority, encouraging people to adopt the dangerous belief that they will never themselves need to assert rights against an overreaching government claiming to act in their name. The appeal of the populists has grown with mounting public discontent over the status quo. In the West, many people feel left behind by technological change, the global economy, and growing inequality. Horrific incidents of terrorism generate apprehension and fear. Some are uneasy with societies that have become more ethnically, religiously and racially diverse. There is an increasing sense that governments and the elite ignore public concerns. In this cauldron of discontent, certain politicians are flourishing and even gaining power by portraying rights as protecting only the terrorist suspect or the asylum seeker at the expense of the safety, economic welfare, and cultural preferences of the presumed majority. They scapegoat refugees, immigrant communities, and minorities. Truth is a frequent casualty. Nativism, xenophobia, racism, and Islamophobia are on the rise.
    [Show full text]