VICTORIAN BAR NEWS
No. 135 ISSN 0159-3285 SUMMER 2005
Appointment of Senior Counsel
A Special Sitting of the High Court of Australia to Welcome the Honourable Justice Susan Crennan Victorian Bar Superannuation Fund The 2005/2006 Victorian Bar Council Criminal Bar Association Farewells Judge Kelly, Former Judge of the County Court Ross Ray QC Farewelled as Bar Council Chairman Howell’s List: Twenty-Five Not Out Launch of the Victorian Sentencing Manual: Online and Free to All Celebratory Dinner: The Honourable Mary Gaudron QC Readers’ Signing of Bar Roll Hurricane Katrina: Destruction in New Orleans Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist: A Personal Remembrance When Barristers Make a Real Difference Bar Hockey 2005 Now carries even more weight, without all the extra kilos.
Are you on top of the changes? Call 1800100 161 for your copy
Ritchie’s Uniform Civil Procedure NSW gives you authoritative coverage of information you need for any of the courts is in the one convenient the three tiers of court procedure, in two convenient volumes. It’s been publication. You’ll find a quick comparison table for the Act and Rules, quick carefully compiled by the same experienced specialists who prepared the indexes for each section, comparative tables of old and new rules, and much previous works, to help you make a seamless transition to the new rules. more. Most importantly, its compact format makes it much more efficient to You no longer need to refer to 3 separate references, because all the buy – and to update in future. Call us now or visit our website to find out more.
For more information call 1800 100 161 or visit www.lexisnexis.com.au/ucp
Terms and conditions apply, please visit www.lexisnexis.com.au/ucp for more information. © 2005 Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 70 001 002 357) trading as LexisNexis. LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., and used under license. VICTORIAN BAR NEWS
No. 135 SUMMER 2005
Contents EDITORS’ BACKSHEET 5 Do Barristers Exist? CORRESPONDENCE 6 Letters to the Editors CHAIRMAN’S CUPBOARD 8 Outstanding New Appointments A Special Sitting of the High Court of Australia CBA Farewells Judge ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S COLUMN to Welcome the Honourable Justice Susan Kelly, Former Judge 10 State-sanctioned Homicide the Antithesis of Crennan. of the County Court. Every Value We Share with Other Nations LEGAL PRACTITIONER’S LIABILITY COMMITTEE 11 Bar Defence ETHICS COMMITTEE BULLETIN 13 Unreported Judgments NEWS AND VIEWS 14 A Special Sitting of the High Court of Australia to Welcome the Honourable Justice Susan Ross Ray QC Reviews Launch of the Victorian Sentencing Manual: Crennan His Year as Bar Online and Free to All. 19 Victorian Bar Superannuation Fund Council Chairman. 20 The 2005/2006 Victorian Bar Council 22 Criminal Bar Association Farewells Judge Kelly, Former Judge of the County Court 26 Ross Ray QC Farewelled as Bar Council Chairman 31 Howell’s List: Twenty-Five Not Out 32 Launch of the Victorian Sentencing Manual: Online and Free to All 38 Celebratory Dinner: The Honourable Mary Gaudron QC 41 Readers’ Signing of Bar Roll When Barristers Make a Real Difference. Celebratory Dinner: 43 Hurricane Katrina: Destruction in New Orleans The Honourable Mary 48 A Bit About Words/Laconic Gaudron QC. 49 Verbatim 50 Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist: A Personal Remembrance 51 When Barristers Make a Real Difference SPORT 52 Bar Hockey 2005 LAWYER’S BOOKSHELF 54 Books Reviewed 54 The Essoign Wine Report
Readers’ Signing of Bar Roll.
Cover: The Silks being welcomed. Bar Hockey 2005. 3 Victorian Bar Council
VICTORIAN BAR COUNCIL Chairs of Standing Committees of the Bar Council for the year 2004/2005 Aboriginal Law Students Mentoring Committee *Executive Committee G Golvan S.C., C.D. Clerks: Applications Review Committee B *Ray QC, W.R. (Chairman) G Digby QC, G.J. B *McMillan S.C., Ms C.F. (Senior Vice-Chairman) Charitable and Sporting Donations Committee A *Shand QC, M.W. (Junior Vice-Chairman) D Riordan S.C., P.J. D *Fajgenbaum QC, J.I. Conciliators for Sexual Harassment and Vilifi cation F *Dunn QC, P.A. B Curtain QC, D.E. F *Dreyfus QC, M.A. G *Lacava S.C., P.G. Counsel Committee G *Crennan S.C., M.J. G Crennan S.C., M.J. D *Beach S.C., D.F.R. (Honorary Treasurer) Editorial Committee for In Brief and Website News F *Quigley S.C., Ms M.L. Section D *Riordan S.C., P.J. D McLeod S.C., Ms F.M. D *Jones, I.R. Equality Before the Law Committee A *Townshend, C.J. A Richards QC, Ms A. W *Neal D.J. R *Doyle, Ms R.M. Ethics Committee D *Duggan, Ms A.E. B McMillan S.C., Ms C.F. L Hannebery, P.J. (Assistant Honorary Treasurer) Human Rights Committee D *Connor, P.X. D Fajgenbaum QC, J.I. F *Knights, Ms K.J. Legal Assistance Committee R *Fairfi eld, C.G. A Macaw QC, R.C. D *Shaw, C.E. Readers’ Course Committee G *Anderson, Ms K.J.D. (Honorary Secretary) G Santamaria S.C., P.D. G *Neskovcin, Ms P.A. (Assistant Honorary Secretary) Continuing Legal Education Committee Ethics Committee B Young QC, N.J. B McMillan S.C., Ms C.F. (Chair) Accreditation and Dispensation Sub-Committee H Merralls AM, QC, J.D. B Young QC, N.J. C Meagher ED, QC, D.R. S Willee QC, RFD, P.A. New Barristers’ Standing Committee S Lally QC, W.F. G Bingham, Ms S.L. F Gobbo QC, J.H. Past Practising Chairmen’s Committee G Lacava S.C., P.G. G Berkeley QC, H.C. A Macaulay S.C., C.C. Professional Indemnity Insurance Committee G Gordon S.C., Ms M.M. A Shand QC, M.W. R Batten, J.L. Professional Standards Education Committee P Williams, I.S. S Willee QC, RFD, P.A. D Kirton. Ms C.E. L Lane, D.J. Victorian Bar Dispute Resolution Committee F Shiff, Ms P.L. B Levin QC, D.S. D Duggan, Ms A.E.
VICTORIAN BAR NEWS Paul Duggan, Peter A. Clarke, Printed by: Impact Printing Editors Victoria Lambropoulos, Richard Brear 69–79 Fallon Street, Gerard Nash QC, Paul Elliott QC and (Editorial Assistant) and Peter Lithgow Brunswick Vic. 3056 (Book Reviews) Judy Benson This publication may be cited as Editorial Board David Johns (Photography) (2004) 135 Vic B.N. Julian Burnside QC Published by The Victorian Bar Inc. Graeme Thompson Owen Dixon Chambers, Advertising 205 William Street, Melbourne 3000. Publications Management Pty Ltd Editorial Consultant 38 Essex Road, Surrey Hills, David Wilken Registration No. A 0034304 S Victoria 3127 Editorial Committee Opinions expressed are not necessarily Telephone: (03) 9888 5977 John Kaufman QC, William F. Gillies, those of the Bar Council or the Bar or Facsimile: (03) 9888 5919 Carolyn Sparke, Georgina Schoff, of any person other than the author. E-mail: [email protected]
4 Editors’ Backsheet Do Barristers Exist?
s the Victorian Bar a mirage? Is there a small group in society who are under Ithe infl uence of some potent, mind- altering substance who believes that there are things called barristers? Evidently, the Deputy Lord Mayor of Melbourne, Mr Gary Singer, doesn’t believe that barristers are real people. Mr Singer, in his guise as a solicitor, was fi ned by the Legal Profession Tribunal for hav- ing some problems with cheques meant to be paid to barristers; those tiresome things sometimes sent to solicitors by other parties, such as insurance compa- nies, as a disbursement to be forwarded on to those strange entities known as barristers. Therefore, under some quaint rules, they are to be paid into a trust account and then paid out to those other illusion-like things: barristers’ clerks. It seems Mr Singer wrote the cheques out but they never went out — got stuck in a solicitors, all being “lawyers”. Those 6.30 “fi rms” then where do they fi t in to the drawer or somewhere else. “current affair” programmers on televi- fabric of the law industry? They are not When all this was reported on the front sion regularly have stories about “greedy legal practitioners but exist in the demi- page of the Herald Sun newspaper, and lawyers”. Recently, the one hosted by Ms monde of “legal person” persons. The the question posed, “Shouldn’t Mr Singer Naomi Robson had a sensational story confusion increases when inspection is resign as Deputy Lord Mayor?”, one of his which cut to footage of people dressed made of the two forms that are sent out to reported responses was to the effect that: up in wigs and gowns. These were not the barristers in order for us to be registered. “None of the clients were affected”. “lawyers” that were the subject of the pro- These forms ask some very strange ques- Well, that’s all right then Mr Singer gram. But it is quite acceptable to lump tions of barristers which, in many cases, — no people were affected by your barristers in there, as we all know they are unanswerable. They continually ask a actions, no one was hurt, because barris- don’t really exist. Only greedy lawyers barrister to nominate his partners, manag- ters don’t really exist, do they? They don’t really exist, no matter what part of the ing partners, CEOs and where he stands have families, mortgages or school fees so profession they inhabit. in a fi rm. As barristers cannot answer it didn’t really matter that you hung on The legislation governing the registra- these questions, does it means they do to their fees. If the Law Institute hadn’t tion of “lawyers” in Victoria also seems to not exist? If you write on the form: “I am undertaken an audit on the fi rm Simon have diffi culty in recognising the exist- a barrister and unable to answer these Parsons & Co (at which you used to be ence of barristers. Because barristers questions” does the great computer in the a partner) and discovered the cheques, don’t have trust funds and are not in sky that registers law industry members when were you planning to pay the bar- cough and splutter and disgorge such risters? When those irritating barristers’ non-conforming creatures? It makes you clerks came chasing, months or years worry in bed at night. after you had received payment to pass on Because barristers don’t Finally, perhaps and most signifi cantly, to the barristers who had completed the have trust funds and are there is the new legislation governing work for your fi rm? fees. The Committee that thought up It is this attitude that continuously sees not in “fi rms” then where this monster obviously does not believe barristers being paid months and years do they fi t in to the fabric of in the existence of the barrister. As most after their fees were due, a practice that the law industry? They are are slowly becoming aware, the new leg- mystifi es bank managers and fi nanciers to not legal practitioners but islation requires the entering into a fees such an extent that they don’t believe that agreement that requires disclosure, dis- barristers are real things. exist in the demi monde of closure, disclosure. However, the import The media also believes that there is “legal person” persons. of the legislation and the fees agreement no distinction between barristers and requirements seem to be directed to
5 Letters to the Editors
solicitors rather than barristers. Not much Judicial Dichotomy but not in the photo, were Sir John Young thought has been given to the situation and Mr Justice Peter Murphy. where briefs are fl icked through the night The Editors John (Jock) Ellis had in fact been a before or on short notice. It seems that a fi ghter pilot in England, who survived barrister has to sit down and spend a few HE Attorney–General, Rob Hulls, in the War, but sadly was killed in a trac- hours drawing up a detailed new agree- This column in Victorian Bar News No. tor accident about fi ve years later. Ian ment disclosing all sorts of things down 134 Spring 2005, seems to have set the bar Stewart had been Australia’s 100 metre to the colour of underpants to be worn too high, even for himself. He expresses freestyle champion in 1939 and repre- the hope of achieving the impossible sented Australia then against Japan and — “It is my hope that we have turned the the United States. Bill Ross served in the dichotomy on its head …” 2nd A.I.F. at Tobruk, El Alamein and the Not much thought has The OED defi nes dichotomy as: South Pacifi c. He was wounded in action been given to the situation Division of a whole into two parts … Divi- and promoted to Captain. He is now 88 where briefs are fl icked sion of a class or genus into two lower mutu- and lives in a home in Canterbury, but is ally exclusive classes or genera. through the night before, physically fi t and very mentally “on the The tone and language of his column ball”. or on short notice. prompted me to provide for readers the following dictionary defi nitions (for brev- With kind regards, during the course of a trial. Non-compli- ity from Collins English Dictionary, Yours sincerely Aust. Ed): ance means non-payment and, ultimately, Charles Francis a trip to the Debt Collection List, VCAT, Blather 1. to talk foolishly; 2. foolish talk, where the chances of barristers’ suc- nonsense. (see also blather-skite) cess don’t appear to be very high. But it Mournful Error doesn’t matter because you don’t have to Cant 1. insincere talk, esp. concerning pay barristers anyway as, in reality, they religion or morals, pious platitudes; 2. stock Dear Editors don’t exist. phrases that have become meaningless OUR reviewer of the 2nd edition of the through repetition. (see also O.E.D defi ni- Oxford Companion to the Supreme APPOINTMENT OF SENIOR COUNSEL Y tion 6 to affect pietistic phraseology, esp. Court of the US (“Lawyers’ Bookshelf”, The Honourable Chief Justice Marilyn as a matter of fashion or profession; to talk No. 134 Bar News, Spring 2005) has Warren AC has appointed as Senior unreally or hypocritically with affectation to appended a “(sic)” to the “morning Counsel the persons listed below, in order piety or goodness.) clothes” description of the garb worn of precedence: Rhetoric 1. the study of the technique of by attorneys appearing before the US Christopher Joseph Wren using language effectively; 2. the art of Supreme Court. While such advocates David John Neal using language to persuade, infl uence or may wish to convey to the court their Barry John Hess please; oratory; 3. excessive use of orna- mourning the injustices suffered by their Brendan Michael Griffi n mentation and contrivance in spoken or clients for whom they seek relief, this does Anthony Aloysius Nolan written discourse; bombast; 4. speech or not affect their style of dress. Christopher James Ryan discourse that pretends to signifi cance but Morning clothes are to evening clothes Paul James Cosgrave lacks true meaning. what Morning Prayer (Matins) is to Michael Richard Pearce Evensong or Evening Service. No one Christopher John Blanden Michael A. Adams QC would suggest Matins are prayers for the Gregory John Lyon recently deceased such as the Jewish Stewart Maxwell Anderson Oops! Kaddish. A toper may well mourn the Michael Phillip McDonald morning after the evening before and an Simon Edward Marks The Editors, imprudent woman might mourn the need Michele Muriel Williams for a morning-after pill lest she later suffer Michael William Thompson N page 30 of the current Bar News morning sickness. Oyou have what is alleged to be a photo It may be that the reviewer has con- The new Silks will announce their of barristers signing the Bar Roll on 3 fused US with English advocates where appointment at Ceremonial Sittings of August 1948. the English barrister’s dress traditionally both the Supreme Court and the Federal The photo is in fact a photo of prac- includes the white cuffs or “weepers” Court on Tuesday 6 December 2005: titioners signing the Victorian Supreme adopted following the death of Queen at 9.15 am to the Supreme Court in Court Roll on Monday 2 August 1948. Anne and retained ever since despite the Blanco Court; and at 10.15 am to From left to right the people are Eric the passage of nearly three centuries. the Full Court of the Federal Court in Hewett, T.A. Miller, A.J. (Bob) Scurry, See, for example, Sir Walter Scott’s Guy Court One, Level 8, 305 William Street John Ellis, G.P. Healy, E. Hayes, I. McC. Mannering and James Joyce’s Ulysses. Melbourne. Stewart, J. Toohey, Brian Thomson, Kerry See, for example, the portraits of Sir Owen Counsel are invited to attend the Horton and J. Gough. Seated and signing Dixon and Sir Frank Gavan Duffy hanging ceremonies, robed (without wigs in the is W.L. (Bill) Ross and opposite him is an in the lobbies of Owen Dixon Chambers Federal Court). Families, friends and chil- Offi cer of the Prothonotary’s Offi ce. West and East and that of Isaacs CJ in the dren of the newly appointed Silks are also Hewett, Scurry and Thomson signed Oxford Companion to the High Court of welcome to attend the sittings. the Bar Roll on 9 September 1948. Also Australia. The Editors admitted to practice on 2 August 1948, If I am wrong the same error com-
6 plained of by the reviewer was committed the basis of homogeneity or the old school • the name will be changed to Senior in the Oxford Companion to the High tie, rather than purely on merit, but these Counsel; Court of Australia (see the entry for nuances may well dissipate in the heady • it will be lawful for appointments to be “Court attire” at page 168). If I am wrong atmosphere of the Essoign. made of lawyers who practise either (I sometimes am but I never doubt), I am Despite the assurances of those who alone or in partnership with any other in good company with Webster’s Third benefi t from its existence, I still believe lawyer (including solicitors) and such New International Dictionary (1961) that the culture at the Bar — and in the appointees would be able to continue and the Oxford English Dictionary (2nd wider profession — needs to change. I am to practise either alone or in partner- ed., 1989) among many others. determined to press on with the campaign ship with any other lawyer. Although I have disclosed my identity to reclaim the term “merit” for a better Otherwise, the power to appoint under to you, for the reason already tendered legal system and encourage the emer- the Royal Prerogative is set to continue. and published (“Letters”, No. 133 Bar gence of a profession that is truly inclu- Yours sincerely News, Winter 2005), I wish to remain sive and respectful of all in its ranks – for Alan Ritchie Your anonymous correspondent the benefi t of all practitioners and, more importantly, for all Victorians. Executive Director New Zealand Law Society Culture at the Bar Yours sincerely Rob Hulls MP To the Editors Attorney-General EADERS of this journal will no Competition Rdoubt take heart that the Bar is The Winston Churchill graced by renaissance men like Geoff The Bar News thanks Mr Jack Steward. They will be relieved that there Dear Editors Hammond QC for providing it are individuals who declare themselves a with copies of the California Bar ANY thanks for the generous wel- misogyny-free zone and who generously Journal. The journal has an excel- come contained in the Spring 2005 count female barristers among their M lent page headed “Trials Digest” Edition of the Victorian Bar News. There acquaintance. in which there is a summary of tri- is unfortunately one error which I should The point seems to be lost on Steward, als and awards in civil cases. The correct. however — as it has been time and again amounts of damages awarded makes At the time that I sailed in the Sydney on his profession — that the law has most interesting reading. to Hobart Yacht Race on the Winston been reluctant to relinquish much of its Therefore, Bar News provides Churchill, it was then the only yacht exclusive and “exclusionary” nature. The the summaries of the trials and asks from the original 1945 fi eld which was still reality is that, in some corners of the readers to give their estimate of the afl oat. It is a matter of great sadness to legal profession, a culture lingers — as damages that have been awarded. me, and all who sailed on her over some it does in all pockets of privilege — that Those entrants whose awards come 50 years, that the Winston Churchill was rewards similarity and discourages, even closest to the amount published in lost at sea with the tragic loss of life dur- penalises, difference. The push to be “one the California Bar Journal will win ing the course of the 1998 race. For those of the boys” — even if it means being the a bottle of claret from The Essoign. interested, the full details are contained butt of a joke that would never be directed in Rob Mundle’s excellent book Fatal Motorcyclist injured at a bloke — is strong, and while this cul- Storm. A motorcyclist was thrown onto a ture persists many women are reluctant guardrail when he swerved to avoid a to stand out lest it be for the “wrong” Yours faithfully tractor/trailer on a winding mountain reasons. Importantly from my perspec- Kim Hargrave road (Baldau v Berkins, El Dorado tive, they may also be reluctant to accept County Superior Court). the mantle of judicial offi ce when it means Award:? being exposed to disrespect or to com- Grants of Silk Benzine exposure pletely distorted forms of scrutiny and Dear Editors evaluation by a self-styled panel worthy of A man who worked as an aircraft the shabbiest talent quests. N both of his letters published in your painter alleged that he contracted We need look no further for an example IWinter edition, John A. Riordan claimed leukaemia as the result of expo- than Steward’s appraisal both of his col- that in New Zealand the decision has been sure to benzine (Komizzey v Axo leagues at the Bar and his superiors on made to abolish Silk. I don’t expect that Products Inc, Los Angeles County the Bench. In charging that some women, the New Zealand position will have much Superior Court). like some men, are “devoid of talent, wit, bearing on yours but I write simply to set Award:? intelligence or skill”, we can only assume out the current position. Sign installer electrocuted that his assessment is as happily objec- It is true that the matter has been A 36-year-old sign installer suffered tive — and as absent in irony — as his under review but the only decisions taken burn injuries when he came in con- measure of those female appointments by the Government appear in the Lawyers tact with a live power line (Baez v to judicial offi ce who, in his humble opin- and Conveyancers Bill, which is still Summit Media, Los Angeles County ion, have not been based on merit. I am before the House of Representatives with Superior Court). curious to know whether Steward would no assurance that it will ever be passed. If Award:? suggest with as much confi dence that, in it is passed, then the changes to the offi ce the past, some men were appointed on of Queen’s Counsel will be:
7 Chairman’s Cupboard Outstanding New Appointments
JUSTICE NEIL YOUNG increase the brief fees paid to barristers N 23 November 2005 the Executive for Legal Aid work. Recently, the Bar Council announced the appoint- Council was informed by Victoria Legal Oment of Neil Young QC as a judge Aid (“VLA”) that the Board of VLA had of the Federal Court of Australia to take resolved to adopt a protocol for the index- effect from 30 November 2005. Justice ation of fees paid to legal practitioners for Young has been an outstanding practising state and criminal law legal aid services: member of the Bar, a distinguished leader “Annually at the commencement of the of this Bar and has been a great role model fi nancial year the VLA Board will review for all barristers. He has demonstrated his state law and criminal law fees with a view intellect, dedication and commitment to adjusting those fees by an indexation to the law during his working life. He amount having regard to the fi nancial was Chairman of the Bar Council for 18 position of the VLA and the operational months from March 1997 to September demands on VLA at the time of the review. 1998 and President of the Australian Following the review, if the Board deter- Bar Association from January 1999 to mines to pay an indexation amount in a February 2000. The Bar warmly acknowl- particular year, the Board shall determine edges and welcomes the appointment of the quantum of that amount.” Justice Young. The work of the specialised group of Bar Councillors charged with the task of JUSTICE SUSAN CRENNAN increasing Legal Aid brief fees continues On 8 November 2005 Justice Susan with the aim of increasing to a realistic NGUYEN TUONG VAN Crennan was sworn in as a Justice of the level the brief fees paid to barristers. High Court of Australia. Members of the Recently, the Bar Council wrote to the LEGAL PROFESSION ACT 2004 Victorian Judiciary and the Victorian Bar Attorney-General of Singapore, to the were well represented at her welcome, Law Society of Singapore, to the Prime The Legal Profession Act 2004 (“the with the heads of all Victorian courts Minister of Australia and to other relevant 2004 Act”) will commence with effect present: 25 Judges and Magistrates from Australian Cabinet Ministers, calling for from 12 December 2004. Representatives Victoria; 37 Victorian Senior Counsel re-consideration of Mr Nguyen’s petition of the Bar Council have met with the Legal and 7 Junior Counsel from Victoria. The for clemency. Services Commissioner, Ms Victoria Marles, large Victorian attendance in Canberra So far as I am aware, this is the only to consult with her as to the extent of the showed the high regard and affection in occasion in its 120-year history that the Bar’s role in the regulatory regime under which Justice Crennan is held by the legal Victorian Bar has sought to be heard the 2004 Act and, in particular, the status profession in this State. in relation to the merits of a petition of rulings and guidance given to barristers in an individual criminal case. The call by the Ethics Committee. It is hoped that NEW SILKS for re-consideration of the petition for these issues will be determined prior to On 24 November 2005, the Chief Justice clemency set out Australia’s substantial the commencement of the 2004 Act. of the Supreme Court announced and signifi cant interest on the facts of the the appointment of 15 new silks. At case based on one ground for clemency PROPOSED RE-DEVELOPMENT OF ceremonial sittings of the Supreme enumerated in the relevant provision of THE SUPREME COURT Court and of the Federal Court on the Singapore Constitution. Recently, there has been publicity 6 December, the new silks announced The Bar has received one response concerning the proposed re-development their appearances. The photograph from the President of the Law Society of of the Supreme Court. One aspect of the taken that day adorns the cover of this Singapore. That response is, in essence, proposal is the demolition of the old High edition of Bar News. The details of the that the Society is unable to act on the Court Building in Little Bourke Street, a new appointments will be published in request contained in the Bar’s letter. building of historical and architectural the Autumn 2006 issue. I congratulate the signifi cance. To enable members to new silks on their appointment and wish LEGAL AID be fully informed on the proposed them the very best in this next step in In the last edition of the Bar News I re-development, the Bar Council has their careers. referred to the Bar Council’s attempts to arranged for the Department of Justice
8 to give a presentation on the proposals. QC. On behalf of the Bar, I thank Paul conducting the workshop. In addition, At this stage, the Bar Council has not for his enormous contribution and for I also thank Barbara Walsh for her resolved on any particular position in his work as Chairman of the Readers’ contribution in organising and assisting at relation to the proposals. Course Committee. There is an account the workshop. Barbara has done this work of the Readers’ Course Dinner held in over the entire time that the workshops READERS’ COURSE 25 YEARS the Essoign on 10 November 2005 in have been conducted and the Bar is The Bar Readers’ Course is celebrating this issue of Bar News. At the dinner, grateful to her for her work over this long its 25th anniversary this year. In 1980, Samuel Vavala, a public prosecutor, and period of time. under the Chairmanship of Hartog Aaron Mane, a public defender, both from Berkeley QC, the Bar Council established the Solomon Islands, presented the Bar SUCCESS FOR BOBSLED COACH the Readers’ Course. Federal Court with an intricately carved dark wooden WILL ALSTERGREN Chief Justice Michael Black was the sculpture depicting sea creatures central Congratulations are due to Astrid Loch- foundation Chairman of the Readers’ to life in the Solomons, which now has Wilkinson and Kylie Reed who have Course — refered to by some as “the pride of place in the Neil Forsyth Room. claimed Australia’s fi rst bobsled medal, Headmaster”. Stephen Charles, Professor driving to silver in the opening Europa the Honourable George Hampel QC and ADVOCACY TRAINING IN PAPUA NEW Cup event of the season in Igls, Austria. retired County Court Judge Michael GUINEA 15 YEARS Congratulations are due to their coach, Kelly QC were all signifi cantly involved This is the 15th year the Bench and Bar barrister Will Alstergren. Will is also the in the establishment and early years of have conducted the Advocacy Skills team captain and pilot for the bobsled the course. David Ross QC designed the Workshop at the Legal Training Institute “Aus 4” team currently competing in educational objectives and Rex Wild QC, of Papua New Guinea. This workshop Europe in the qualifying races for the now Director of Public Prosecutions in is the advocacy component in the fi nal Winter Olympic Games in February 2006. the Northern Territory, structured and examinations for admission to practice co-ordinated the fi rst course. The fi rst in Papua New Guinea. Those teaching FINALLY Readers’ Practice Course Committee in the course held in October 2005 were On my own behalf, and on behalf of the consisted of retired Chief Justice Phillips, Paul Coghlan QC, Director of Public Bar Council, I extend best wishes to all Master Michael Dowling QC and David Prosecutions, Ian Hill QC, Her Honour members of the Bar for the vacation Ross QC. Magistrate Lesley Fleming and barristers period. Paul Santamaria S.C. has completed Geoffrey Steward, Julie Condon, Martin two years as Chairman of the Readers’ Grinberg and Ronald Gipp. On behalf of Kate McMillan S.C. Course Committee and is now stepping the Bar, I thank all of the people who Chairman down and has been replaced by Ian Hill provided their time and expertise in
9 Attorney-General’s Column State-sanctioned Homicide the Antithesis of Every Value We Share with Other Nations
Y the time this edition goes to print, rejects any form of mandatory sentencing. the fate — the ultimate fate — of In fl outing the discretion of Singapore’s Ban Australian citizen will have been judiciary — in requiring a penalty, no decided by an Executive Government of matter what the situation — this law another country. At the time of writing, abdicates its primary responsibility to the Government of Singapore has just be the instrument of justice — yes, a set a date for the execution of Mr Nguyen device that implements punishment, but Van Tuong and, while thousands around also one which offers an opportunity for the nation and even across the globe redemption, for rehabilitation — one that stage demonstrations of their support is capable of leniency and compassion. for Mr Nguyen and for their abhorrence I know that various members of the of the death penalty, state and federal Bar, and the Bar community as a whole, governments make their fi nal pleas for have been working tirelessly on behalf of clemency. Mr Nguyen. I’m also aware of the ongoing It is surreal, in the extreme, to think work of many at the Bar for others around that, in the 21st century, we could fi nd the world who face a similar fate and, on ourselves in such a situation. Obviously behalf of the Government and the people it would be naïve to suggest that of Victoria, I take this opportunity to countless acts of brutality do not occur express our appreciation. I know that, every day around the world. State- whatever the outcome of Mr Nguyen’s sanctioned homicide, however, is the case, Victorians share in your reverence antithesis of every value we share with contraband. He has done what, in the for the value of Mr Nguyen’s life, no other nations who, like Singapore, have tradition of most Commonwealth legal matter what his actions; and condemn a inherited the tradition of the rule of law. systems, would earn him a reduction in penalty that is utterly disproportionate to I believe — and the Bracks Government sentence. Yet the relevant law not only any offence, let alone the offence to which believes — that the right to life is the authorises but demands the imposition Mr Nguyen has admitted — one that, most fundamental human right of all and of death, demonstrating no fl exibility ultimately, devalues the lives of us all. that the authorisation — the imposition — or consideration for the individual and This is why it is crucial that of its calculated and detached termination inevitably differing circumstances of each governments, and in particular the is, quite simply, an abomination that case. Federal Government, do everything within must be reviled no matter what the This is an extreme example — and their power to restate our veneration circumstances, no matter the gravity of I wish it were only a theoretical one for human rights and aggressively lobby the offence. — of why the Bracks Government utterly other countries around the globe that As readers will appreciate all too apply a mandatory death penalty. Just as keenly, Mr Nguyen’s case makes the the efforts of individuals at the Bar and of circumstances in which this penalty organisations like Amnesty International may be imposed even more horrifying. Our collective efforts became a global campaign to save the life Having admitted to attempting to traffi c a must begin to turn the of one man, so our collective efforts must substantial quantity of heroin to Australia tide against a form of begin to turn the tide against a form of through Singapore, he has demonstrated punishment that needs to punishment that needs to be relegated to signifi cant remorse, pleaded guilty, the annals of history. cooperated at every stage with police be relegated to the annals and even agreed to testify against those of history. Rob Hulls on whose behalf he was transporting the Attorney-General
10 Legal Practitioner’s Liability Committee Bar Defence Looking at the Legal Profession Act 2004 from an insurance and risk management perspective
rules for approved Clerks, and the The LPLC has received a number of requests right of the Victorian Bar to make rules for advice as to any specifi c insurance or risk and standards for the conduct of legal practice (subject to approval by the management implications for barristers arising Legal Services Board). • Professional indemnity insurance from the Legal Profession Act 2004 (“the Act”) through the LPLC is unchanged. • Advocates immunity from liability for which takes effect on 12 December 2005, and negligence is preserved (see section repeals the Legal Practice Act 1996 (“the old 7.2.11). • Costs and disclosure obligations are Act”). the most signifi cant area of change for barristers, with the new regime HIS article is a brief response to orders as under the old Act, with the representing a general tightening of those questions. Key features of the exception that the jurisdiction to make laws designed to improve disclosure TAct are explained below. compensation orders is increased from and provide clients with even greater • Creation of the Legal Services Board, $15,000 to $25,000. rights to withhold payment if disclosure to replace the Legal Practice Board Note, that as the LPLC professional obligations have not been observed, as the peak regulatory body for the indemnity policy responds to civil and to have costs reviewed. Victorian legal profession. complaints by a client alleging There is no substitute for a full review of • Creation of the position of Legal pecuniary loss caused by a barrister’s these laws by all barristers, and readers are Services Commissioner, to replace the negligence, such complaints should be referred to Part 3.4 of the Act, particularly Legal Ombudsman. The Legal Services notifi ed immediately to the LPLC upon sections 3.4.9–3.4.45 inclusive. In reading Commissioner will now be the sole receipt. these sections, readers should note that a gateway for receiving civil complaints/ • Facilitating interstate legal practice disputes (including costs disputes) by granting locally admitted lawyers and disciplinary complaints made the designation of “Australian legal against barristers. The Legal Services practitioner”. The Act provides (see Commissioner may choose to refer section 2.2.2) that a person must not TA I LO R I N G such complaints to the Victorian Bar for engage in legal practice (a term which is investigation, though whether she does not defi ned by the Act, and is therefore Suits tailored to measure so, and the extent of any delegation, left to case law) unless the person is remains to be seen in practice once an Australian legal practitioner. This Alterations and invisible the Act commences. There are some reservation of the right to practice mending powers the Commissioner cannot is mirrored in corresponding laws in delegate (see section 6.3.12). other States. Quality off-rack suits A client may make such a • New provisions relating to Incorporated Repairs to legal robes complaint within six years after the Legal Practices and Multi-disciplinary conduct complained about allegedly Partnerships are of no relevance to Bar jackets made to order occurred (see section 4.2.5). The Act barristers whose legal profession rules now provides that they will fi rst be will continue to require that barristers investigated by the Commissioner, and engage in sole practice — refer to suitable cases will be subjected to a Victorian Bar Practice Rule 114. mediation process. If the complaint • Provisions relating to legal practice LES LEES TAILORS cannot be resolved, the Commissioner generally are largely unchanged, with Shop 8, 121 William Street, will notify the parties, and the client the provisions of the old Act restated, Melbourne, Vic 3000 then has 60 days to apply to VCAT including the prohibitions against Tel: 9629 2249 (the Legal Profession Tribunal is now compul-sory clerking, compulsory Frankston chambers and compulsory robing. Co- constituted as a division of VCAT) for Tel: 9783 5372 the complaint to be heard. VCAT has advocacy and direct-access briefs are the same range of powers to make preserved, as well as trust account
11 barrister is regarded as a “law practice” where the client has waived disclosure; disclosure as part of the materials for the purposes of the Act. where the client is a public company briefed. Some sections which are noteworthy or a foreign company, or subsidiary of • Section 3.4.17 — any failure to make from a “risk management” perspective either; or where the client is another a required disclosure under the Act (paraphrased for brevity) are: lawyer. relieves the client of the obligation • Section 3.4.10(2) — a barrister • Section 3.4.13 — This is a new to pay the legal costs rendered, and retained by a solicitor must disclose obligation, and one which barristers proceedings cannot be maintained to the solicitor the basis on which the should carefully note. Before for recovery of costs unless and until barrister’s costs will be calculated; an settlement of litigious matters, a the Supreme Court Taxing Master has estimate of the total legal costs, or barrister must disclose to the client a reviewed the bill. This section also range of estimates with an explanation reasonable estimate of the legal costs provides that any failure to make a of the major variables affecting the payable by the client if the matter is required disclosure may amount to calculation; and details of billing settled (including costs payable to the unsatisfactory conduct or professional intervals. This information is necessary other party), and a reasonable estimate misconduct. to enable the solicitor to in turn of any costs recovery available from • Section 3.4.35 — all bill of costs must comply with his/her obligation to make another party. When the barrister is be accompanied by a written state- the necessary costs disclosure to the instructed by a solicitor (as will usually ment explaining the various avenues client. be the case), then the barrister does open to the client to dispute the costs In the case of direct access briefs, not have to make this disclosure if charged. the barrister’s disclosure obligation is the solicitor has done so. However, As costs disputes can and do often much broader than where the retainer the obligation would seem to be on escalate into a much larger professional is via a solicitor. Section 3.4.9 details all the barrister to satisfy himself/herself negligence claim, barristers should think of the matters that must be disclosed that the instructing solicitor has in fact carefully when considering their options to the client, and these generally made the necessary disclosure — and for recovering outstanding fees. The Act repeat the provisions of the old Act. if not so satisfi ed, the barrister could now contains more “consumer safeguards” Exemptions from the disclosure not say he/she has discharged his/her than ever, and it would be advisable to obligation are set out in section 3.4.12 own disclosure obligation. As a matter seek independent and objective opinion and are also similar to exemptions of practicality, it would seem to require from a professional colleague before under the old Act — they include the barrister to call upon the solicitor initiating Court action. where the costs do not exceed $750; to produce a copy of the solicitor’s
-%,"/52.% #(!-"%23 2!)3%3 4(% "!2
,A4ROBE 3TREET %LIZABETH 3TREET 7ILLIAM 3TREET 1UEEN 3TREET
!T LAST #HAMBERS DESIGNED AROUND THE SPECIAL NEEDS +ING 3TREET &%$%2!, OF BARRISTERS #/5243
N 0LENTY OF NATURAL LIGHT IN EVERY CHAMBER AND ON EVERY mOOR -%,"/52.% #/5.49 -!')342!4%3 -%,"/52.% #/524 N &IRST