DOCSLIB.ORG

Paul and Pseudepigraphy Pauline Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paul and Pseudepigraphy Pauline Studies Paul and Pseudepigraphy Pauline Studies Series editor Stanley E. Porter Professor of New Testament at McMaster Divinity College Hamilton, Ontario VOLUME 8 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/past Paul and Pseudepigraphy Edited by Stanley E. Porter and Gregory P. Fewster LEIDEN • bOSTON 2013 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 1572-4913 ISBN 978-90-04-25668-2 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-25847-1 (e-book) Copyright 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables ............................................................................ vii Abbreviations ................................................................................................... ix Preface ................................................................................................................ xiii On Pauline Pseudepigraphy: An Introduction ..................................... 1 Stanley E. Porter and Gregory P. Fewster I. CRITICAL ISSUES IN PAULINE PSEUDEPIGRAPHY Authorship and Pseudepigraphy in Early Christian Literature: A Translation of the Most Important Source Texts and an Annotated Bibliography ........................................................................... 11 Armin D. Baum Pauline Chronology and the Question of Pseudonymity of the Pastoral Epistles ......................................................................................... 65 Stanley E. Porter Hermeneutical Issues in Canonical Pseudepigrapha: The Head/Body Motif in the Pauline Corpus as a Test Case ....... 89 Gregory P. Fewster Style and Pseudonymity in Pauline Scholarship: A Register Based Configuration ............................................................. 113 Andrew W. Pitts The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles: An Important Hypothesis Reconsidered ............................................................................................... 153 Jermo van Nes II. PAULINE PSEUDEPIGRAPHY WITHIN THE CHRISTIAN CANON A Deutero-Pauline Mystery? Ecclesiology in Colossians and Ephesians ...................................................................................................... 173 Sigurd Grindheim vi contents The Imitation Hypothesis: Pseudepigraphic Remarks on 2 Thessalonians with Help from Documentary Papyri .................. 197 Christina M. Kreinecker Christology, Greco-Roman Religious Piety, and the Pseudonymity of the Pastoral Letters .............................................................................. 221 Linda L. Belleville Hebrews as an Instructional Appendix to Romans ............................. 245 Clare K. Rothschild The Epistolary Closing of Hebrews and Pauline Imitation ............... 269 Bryan R. Dyer III. PAULINE PSEUDEPIGRAPHY OUTSIDE THE CHRISTIAN CANON Dusting Off a Pseudo-Historical Letter: Re-Thinking the Epistolary Aspects of the Apocryphal Epistle to the Laodiceans .................... 289 Philip L. Tite The Pseudepigraphical Correspondence between Seneca and Paul: A Reassessment .......................................................................................... 319 Ilaria L. E. Ramelli The Heretics’ Apostle and Two Pauline Pseudepigrapha from Nag Hammadi ............................................................................................. 337 Michael Kaler Index of Ancient Sources ............................................................................. 353 Index of Modern Authors ............................................................................. 368 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figures Andrew W. Pitts 1 Levels of social variation: The temporal and contextual axis .... 124 2 Comparative register profile landscape with formal situational parameters .................................................................................................. 128 3 A register profile landscape for the Pauline corpus ...................... 136 4 Variation configuration graph according to co-textual and contextual dimensions within the tenor metafunction of the Pauline corpus ........................................................................................... 139 5 The density of Paul’s favored conjunctions in the prison letters ............................................................................................................ 142 6 Co-textual variation in φιλο—Initial words and α-privatives tracking with contextual variation ...................................................... 146 7 Conjunction usage in the Pastorals .................................................... 150 Tables Philip L. Tite 1 Parallel paraenetic elements ................................................................. 304 ABBREVIATIONS AB Anchor Bible AnBib Analecta Biblica ANRW Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ANTC Abingdon New Testament Commentaries ATR Anglican Theological Review BBR Bulletin for Biblical Research BECNT Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament BETL Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium Bib Biblica BIS Biblical Interpretation Series BJRL Bulletin of the John Rylands Library BN Biblische Notizen BNTC Black’s New Testament Commentaries BT The Bible Translator BTB Biblical Theology Bulletin BZNW Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche CbNT Commentaire biblique: Nouveau Testament CBQ The Catholic Biblical Quarterly CNT Commentaar op het Nieuwe Testament EBib Études Bibliques ECC Eerdmans Critical EKK Evangelisch Katholischer Kommentar ESCJ Studies in Early Christianity and Judaism/Études sur le chris- tianisme et le judaïsme EvQ Evangelical Quarterly ExpTim Expository Times GRRS Graeco-Roman Religion Series HBS Herders Biblische Studien Herm Hermathena HTKNT Herders theologischer Kommentar zum Nuen Testament HTR Harvard Theological Review HTS Harvard Theological Studies HUT Hermeneutische Untersuchungen zur Theologie IBS Irish Biblical Studies x abbreviations ICC International Critical Commentary InvLuc Invigilata Lucernis JAC Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum JBL Journal of Biblical Literature JECS Journal of Early Christian Studies JETh Jahrbuch für Evangelikale Theologie JSJSup Supplement to the Journal for the Study of Judaism JSNT Journal for the Study of the New Testament JSNTSup Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series JSOT Journal for the Study of the Old Testament JSP Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha JTS Journal of Theological Studies LCL Loeb Classical Library LLC Literary and Linguistic Computing LNTS Library of New Testament Studies MJTM McMaster Journal of Theology and Ministry MNTC Moffatt New Testament Commentaries Neot Neotestamentica NIB The New Interpreter’s Bible NIGTC New International Greek Text Commentary NovT Novum Testamentum NTL New Testament Library NTM New Testament Monographs NTOA/StUNT Novum Testamentum Et Orbis Antiquus/Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments NTS New Testament Studies PAST Pauline Studies PNTC Pillar New Testament Commentaries PVTG Pseudepigrapha Veteris Testamenti Graece RB Revue Biblique ResQ Restoration Quarterly RGG Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart RIL Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo RNT Regensburger Neues Testament RSI Rivista Strocia Italiana RST Regensburger Studien zur Theologie RTR Reformed Theological Review SAPERE Scripta Antiquitatis Posterioris ad Ethicam Religion- emque Pertinentia abbreviations xi SB Sources Bibliques SBL.TT Society of Biblical Literature Texts and Translations Series SBS Stuttgarter Bibelstudien SJT Scottish Journal of Theology SNTSMS Society of New Testament Studies Monograph Series SNTU Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt StBL Studies in Biblical Literature TENT Texts and Editions for New Testament Study Th Theology THKNT Theologischer Handkommentar zum Neuen Testament TLZ Theologische Literaturzeitung TNTC Tyndale New Testament Commentaries TQ Theologische Quartalschrift TRE Theologische Realenzyklopädie TrinJ Trinity Journal TynBul Tyndale Bulletin VetChr Vetera Christianorum WBC Word Biblical Commentary WUNT Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament ZNT Zeitschrift für Neues Testament ZNW Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche PREFACE This eighth volume in the series, Pauline Studies, is on Paul and pseude- pigraphy—in general, within the New Testament, and outside the New Testament. The seven previous volumes are: The Pauline Canon, ed. Stanley E. Porter (PAST 1; Leiden: Brill, 2004), Paul and His Opponents, ed. Stanley E. Porter (PAST 2; Leiden: Brill, 2005), Paul and His Theology, ed. Stanley E. Porter (PAST 3; Leiden:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 69 CHAPTER 4 PAUL and PETER: FIRST-CENTURY LETTER WRITERS 1. Paul's Letters and His Co-Authors Among Thirteen Traditional Paul
    CHAPTER 4 PAUL AND PETER: FIRST-CENTURY LETTER WRITERS 1. Paul’s Letters and His Co-authors Among thirteen traditional Pauline letters, including the disputed letters – Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, and the Pastoral Epistles – Paul’s colleagues are shown as co-senders in his eight letters. Figure 3. Cosenders in Paul’s Epistles 1 Corinthians Sosthenes 2 Corinthians Timothy Galatians All the brothers with Paul Philippians Timothy Colossians Timothy 1 Thessalonians Silvanus and Timothy 2 Thessalonians Silvanus and Timothy Philemon Timothy The issue that the co-senders in the Pauline letters naturally signify co-authors certainly seems to deserve investigation; however, it has been ignored by scholars. On this point, Prior criticizes Doty and White for not differentiating between the associates who greet at the closing of the letter and the colleagues who are named in 69 the letter address, and for not even stating the appearance of “co-senders” including confounding them with amanuenses, respectively. 1 Similarly, Murphy-O’Connor properly points out that it is simply habitual not to distinguish those correspondences that Paul composed with co-senders from those correspondences he wrote solely.2 According to Prior and Richards, the practice of co-authorship in the ancient world is exceedingly unusual. Among the extant papyri, Prior and Richards found merely fifteen and six letters, respectively.3 This minute ratio clearly shows that Paul’s naming of different individuals with the author at the beginning of the correspondence was not an insignificant custom.4 It is generally suggested that Paul’s naming his associates in the address of his letters is “largely a matter of courtesy.”5 However, this traditional and customary view is criticized by Richards on at least two points.
    [Show full text]
  • Couverture BABELAO 1 2012
    BABELAO Electronic Journal for Ancient and Oriental Studies 1 (2012) D. PHILLIPS , The Syriac Commentary of Dadisho‘ Qatraya on the Paradise of the Fathers. Towards a Critical Edition N. AFIF , Un nouveau témoin de l’Histoire des Sept Dormants d’Ephèse. Le manuscrit Cambridge Syr. Add. 2020. Texte et traduction J.-C. HAELEWYCK , The Phoenician Inscription of Eshmunazar. An Attempt at Vocalization C.-B. AMPHOUX , Pour une approche documentaire des paroles de Jésus J.K. ELLIOTT , Recent Trends in the Textual Criticism of the New Testament. A New Millenium, a New Beginning? F. GANGLOFF , Les données archéologiques sur Juda à la période néo-babylonienne (586-538 av. J.C.). Un état de la question ACADÉMIE BELGE POUR L ’É TUDE DES LANGUES ANCIENNES ET ORIENTALES (ABELAO) UNIVERSITÉ DE LOUVAIN , LOUVAIN -LA -NEUVE BABELAO Electronic Journal for Ancient and Oriental Studies General Editor/Directeur Jean-Claude Haelewyck (Louvain-la-Neuve) Assistant Editors/Secrétaires Axel Van de Sande (Bruxelles), David Phillips (Louvain-la- Neuve) Editorial Committee/Comité de rédaction Alessandro Bausi (Hamburg), Anne Boud’hors (Paris), Antoine Cavigneaux (Genève), Sabino Chialà (Bose), Bernard Coulie (Louvain-la-Neuve), Alain Delattre (Bruxelles), Johannes Den Heijer (Louvain-la-Neuve), Didier Devauchelle (Lille), Jean- Charles Ducène (Bruxelles), James Keith Elliott (Leeds), Jean- Daniel Macchi (Genève), Claude Obsomer (Louvain-la-Neuve), Agnès Ouzounian (Paris), Tamara Pataridzé (Louvain-la- Neuve), Paul-Hubert Poirier (Laval, Québec), Véronique Somers (Paris, Louvain-la-Neuve), David Taylor (Oxford), Anton Vojtenko (Moscou). ISSN: 2034-9491 BABELAO 1 (2012), p. 1-23 © ABELAO (Belgium) The Syriac Commentary of Dadisho‘ Qatraya on the Paradise of the Fathers Towards a Critical Edition By David Phillips Université de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve part from the indications given by ‘Abdisho‘’s 14th cen- tury catalogue 1, Dadisho‘ Qatraya - ܥÎ ܕܕ - (DQ), who probably flourished during the second half of A 2 the 7th century , is only known to us through his surviving works.
    [Show full text]
  • Scribal Habits in Selected New Testament Manuscripts, Including Those with Surviving Exemplars
    SCRIBAL HABITS IN SELECTED NEW TESTAMENT MANUSCRIPTS, INCLUDING THOSE WITH SURVIVING EXEMPLARS by ALAN TAYLOR FARNES A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute for Textual Scholarship and Electronic Editing Department of Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham April 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract In the first chapter of this work, I provide an introduction to the current discussion of scribal habits. In Chapter Two, I discuss Abschriften—or manuscripts with extant known exemplars—, their history in textual criticism, and how they can be used to elucidate the discussion of scribal habits. I also present a methodology for determining if a manuscript is an Abschrift. In Chapter Three, I analyze P127, which is not an Abschrift, in order that we may become familiar with determining scribal habits by singular readings. Chapters Four through Six present the scribal habits of selected proposed manuscript pairs: 0319 and 0320 as direct copies of 06 (with their Latin counterparts VL76 and VL83 as direct copies of VL75), 205 as a direct copy of 2886, and 821 as a direct copy of 0141.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COLLECTION of PAUL's LETTERS Return to Religion-Online the Oldest Extant Editions of the Letters of Paul by David Trobisch
    THE COLLECTION OF PAUL'S LETTERS return to religion-online The Oldest Extant Editions of the Letters of Paul by David Trobisch David Trobisch was born in Cameroon (West Africa) as the son of missionaries. The family then moved to Austria. He studied theology at the Universitiesof Tuebingen and Heidelberg in Germany. He taught at the University of Heidelberg for ten years before accepting teaching positions at South West Missouri State University, Yale Divinity School and Bangor Theological Seminary. For a more detailed curriculum vitae and a list of publications see http://www.bts.edu/faculty/trobisch.htm The Oldest Extant Editions of the Letters of Paul (David Trobisch, 1999) David Trobisch was born in Cameroon (West Africa) as the son of missionaries. The family then moved to Austria. He studied theology at the Universitiesof Tuebingen and Heidelberg in Germany. He taught at the University of Heidelberg for ten years before accepting teaching positions at South West Missouri State University, Yale Divinity School and Bangor Theological Seminary. For a more detailed curriculum vitae and a list of publications see http://www.bts.edu/faculty/trobisch.htm Table of Contents Introduction* Different Editions* Huge Number of Manuscripts* Grouping Manuscripts* The Authorized Byzantine Version* Fragmentary Manuscripts* The Manuscripts* Introduction* Notation of Manuscripts* The Oldest Manuscripts of the Christian Bible* Codex Alexandrinus (A 02)* Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C 04)* Codex Sinaiticus (À 01)* Codex Vaticanus (B 03)* Number and Sequence
    [Show full text]
  • The Sources of the KJV the Hebrew and Greek Manuscripts Used and the Debt to Earlier Translations
    comparing these private revisions. This revision which spent nine months compounding disagree- being completed, a company circulated its work, ments among companies.” 24 book by book, among the other companies. From Despite the limited information about the ac- this circulation there resulted revisions, made tivities of the translators, the evidence strongly in the light of objections raised to the work of a supports the view that they worked diligently company, and an excursus upon any objections according to their brief, with a single aim: to pro- which the original company did not agree to. Then duce an accurate and intelligible translation into the translators circulated their work among the English of the texts available to them, believing learned men who were not official translators, and that this was the very Word of God. For them, as revised their work in view of suggestions from it should be for us, the work was more important these men. Now the translators had to circulate than the worker. these revisions among the other companies. Then, they prepared the final text. The final text they submitted to the general meeting in London, 24 Allen, quoted in Vance, King James, op. cit., pp. 49-50. The sources of the KJV The Hebrew and Greek manuscripts used and the debt to earlier translations Jonathan Burke LTHOUGH IT BECAME the most influen- manuscript). These original Hebrew text sources tial English Bible translation in history, the were used by the scholars of the fifteenth century AKing James Version was by no means the to produce ‘critical texts,’ 3 from which transla- first English Bible translation, nor even the first tors could render the text into English.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the New Testament Letters
    INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT LETTERS Curtis Byers 2020 Painting on Front Cover Apostle Paul Rembrandt, 1635 Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna. Introduction to the New Testament Letters Preface The New Testament has four main literary genres: gospel, history, letters, and apocalyptic. These four genres are not independent (gospel can be viewed as a subcategory of history) nor exhaustive (the letters, for example, contain other genres such as poetry), but they give us a sense of the major components to the New Testament. The Old Testament contains or refers to several letters1, but most of the Old Testament is history (even the prophetic books were considered history by the Jews). This emphasis upon history is understandable when one realizes that the Jews properly saw God at work in their history to accomplish his purposes. In contrast, a major portion of the New Testament is comprised of letters. This is consistent with one scholars’ observation concerning the wide use of letters in the New Testament era: The popularity of the letter form increased significantly during the Hellenistic period due to a variety of factors: the increase in scribal learning and influence, the growing availability and relatively inexpensive cost of papyrus as a writing material, the need to monitor accurately expansions in the area of trade and commerce and the desire of political leaders to spread imperial propaganda. The Roman period witnessed an even greater rise in this literary form as the letter increasingly became a common means of communication among people of all stations in life, thereby causing one modern scholar to note that “letter writing was almost a disease” (Brooke).
    [Show full text]
  • Mark As Contributive Amanuensis of 1 Peter?
    MARK AS CONTRIBUTIVE AMANUENSIS OF 1 PETER? AN INQUIRY INTO MARK’S INVOLVEMENT IN LIGHT OF FIRST-CENTURY LETTER WRITING __________________ A Thesis Presented to the Department of New Testament Studies in the Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria __________________ In Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Philosophiae Doctor __________________ by Jongyoon Moon Supervisor: Professor Gert J. Steyn 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Primarily, this thesis is dedicated to God, our Father. Many people have been involved in the completion of this work, although it bears my name. I will never forget the love and help I have been given by my supervisor, Professor Gert J. Steyn, without whom, I believe, this work could not have been brought into the world. To him I owe an immense debt of gratitude for his guidance accompanied by an exemplary degree of dedication and interest, for suggesting numerous fruitful lines of enquiry, and for saving me from the many errors I could have made. I express also my sincere appreciation to Professor A. B. du Toit for his helpful counsel and comments upon this work, as well as my gratitude to Professor B. Paul Wolfe at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (USA), who introduced me to the world of NT scholarship. This thesis owes a great deal to the works of Professor E. Randolph Richards. I would like to give special thanks to Korean colleagues in Pretoria; especially, to Drs. Eun-Chul Shin and Hyukjung Kwon, and to Revs. Young-Jin Kim, Jeong-Gun Seo, Tae-Hyun Kim, Jae-Soon Kim, Shin-Man Kang, Jeong-Wook Shin, Yong-Joon Kim, and Jae-Suk Han who have studied together.
    [Show full text]