DOCSLIB.ORG

T N the Discussion on the Date of Kanishka Which Took Place Last Year

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T N the Discussion on the Date of Kanishka Which Took Place Last Year XXIX THE DATE OF KANISHKA BY J. H. MARSHALL, C.I.E., LITT.D., F.S.A. T N the discussion on the date of Kanishka which took place last year much prominence was given to the so-called Vikrama era of 58 B.C., and arguments were put forward by those who favoured an early date for Kanishka to prove, not only that this era was founded by him, but that all the recorded dates of the Saka, Pahlava, and Kushan rulers of Northern India are referable to it. Some discoveries which I have recently made at Taxila throw, I think, fresh light on this question, and, though they do not settle precisely the date of Kanishka, appear to prove that he was not at any rate the founder of the era of 58 B.C. and could not have come to the throne until the close of the first century A.D. or later. One of these discoveries I made in a small chapel immediately west of the so-called " Chir" stupa. The chapel in question is built in a small diaper type of masonry, which came into vogue at Taxila about the middle of the first century A.D. and lasted for about a hundred years. Its entrance faces the main stupa, and near the back wall opposite this entrance, and about a foot below the floor, I found a deposit consisting of a steatite vessel with a silver vase inside, and in the vase an inscribed scroll and a small gold casket containing some minute bone relics. A heavy stone placed over the deposit had, unfortunately, been crushed down by the fall of the roof and had broken both the steatite vessel and the silver vase, but had left the gold casket uninjured and chipped only a few fragments from the edge of the scroll, nearly all of which I was, happily, able to recover Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. INSEAD, on 06 Mar 2018 at 11:08:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00047444 974 THE DATE OF KANISHKA Taxila inscription of the year 136 ft- -f^ <*- JV- §^ ? > c ^ ^ ^ Jr ^ c~- ^ cA. A. <^ JV- V V A- * - 5; " r * - Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. INSEAD, on 06 Mar 2018 at 11:08:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00047444 THE DATE OF KANISHKA 975 by carefully sifting and washing the earth in the vicinity. The cleaning and transcription of the record was a matter of exceptional difficulty, as the scroll, which is only 6| inches long by If inches wide and of very thin metal, had been rolled up tightly, face inwards, in order that it might be enclosed in the silver vase ; moreover, the metal of which it is composed is silver alloyed with a small percentage of copper, which had formed an efflorescence on the surface of the extremely brittle band, with the result that I could neither unroll it without breaking it nor subject it to the usual chemical treatment. By the use of strong acid, however, applied with a zinc pencil, I was able to remove the copper efflorescence and expose, one by one, the punctured dots of the lettering on the back of the scroll, and then, having transcribed these with the aid of a mirror, to break off a section of the scroll and so continue the process of cleaning and transcription. In this way I succeeded in making a complete copy of the record from the back of the scroll, while the letters were yet intact. Afterwards I cleaned in like manner and copied the face of each of the broken sections, and was gratified to find that my second transcript was in accurate agreement with the first. I mention these details in order to explain why it is impracticable to present a purely mechanical reproduction of the record, and why the transcript given below, which was made section by section and necessarily without any reference to the meaning of the record, may be regarded as trustworthy. My reading of this inscription is as follows :•— Text Line 1. Sa 100.20.10.4.1.1 Ayasa Ashadasa masasa divase 10.4.1 isa divase pradistavita Bhagavato dhatuo Dhurasa(?)- 1. 2. kena Dhitaphria-putrana Bahaliena Noachae nagare vastavena tena ime pradistavita Bhagavato dhatuo dhamara- JRAS. 1914. 63 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. INSEAD, on 06 Mar 2018 at 11:08:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00047444 976 THE DATE OF KANISHKA 1. 3. ie Tachhasie Tanuae Bodhisatvagahami maha- rajasa rajatirajasa devaputrasa Khushanasa arogadachhinae ]. 4. sarva-budhana puyae prachaga-budhana puyae arahana puyae sarvasa(tva)na puyae mata-pitu puyae mitra-macha-fiati-sa- 1. 5. dhihona puyae atmano arogadachhinae nianae hotu a . de sa ma parichago Translation In the year 136 of Azes, on the 15th day of the month of Ashadha —on this day relics of the Holy One (Buddha) were enshrined by Dhurasakes (?), son of Dhitaphria, a Bactrian, resident at the town of Noacha. By him these relics of the Holy One were enshrined in the Bodhisattva chapel at Tanua (?) in Takha^ila of the religious realm, for the bestowal of perfect health upon the great king, king of kings, the divine Khushana; for the veneration of all Buddhas; for the veneration of individual Buddhas ; for the veneration of the Saints; for the veneration of all sentient beings ; for the veneration of (his) parents; for the veneration of (his) friends, advisers, kinsmen, and associates; for the bestowal of perfect health upon himself. May this gift be ... For Dhitaphria-putrana Mr. D. R. Bhandarkar suggests the reading dliitastria-putrana, which, in combination with bahaliena, he would translate " accompanied by his daughters, wife and sons ". For the meaning of Bahaliena (= " a man from Balkh") I am indebted to Professor Rapson and Professor Konow. To Mr. Bhandarkar I am also indebted for the suggestion that dhamaraia = Skt. dharmarajya. The absence of any royal titles attached to the name of Azes is exceptional, but will hardly occasion surprise when it is borne in mind that his era had been in use for more than a century, and that his dynasty had been Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. INSEAD, on 06 Mar 2018 at 11:08:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00047444 THE DATE OF KANISHKA 977 supplanted by that of the Kushans. When did this era of Azes commence ? That it is one and the same as the era in which the Gondophernes and Panjtar records are dated will, I think, be admitted by everyone, and I shall not therefore pause to discuss the point. If, then, Dr. Fleet is correct in referring the dates of the latter records to the era of 58 B.C., it follows that it was Azes I and not Kanishka who founded that era. That Azes I came to the throne about that date is now, indeed, attested by the evidence of coins and other antiquities at Taxila, which indicate that he was reigning in the third quarter of the first century B.C., while the probability that he may have founded an era is also suggested by the abundance of his coins, which denote his pre-eminence among the Saka-Pahlava sovereigns. Notwithstanding, however, the very strong reasons which Dr. Fleet has adduced for referring the dates in the Gondophernes and Panjtar records to the era of 58 B.C., the identity of the era of Azes and the Vikrama era can hardly be regarded as fully established, and, to my mind, it is quite possible that the era of Azes will be found to have commenced a few years earlier or later than 58 B.C. Assuming that it started actually in that year, the date given in the new inscription will fall in the year A.D. 79; and the next important point is to determine which of the Kushan kings is referred to as reigning in that year. That he is identical with the nameless Kushan ruler mentioned in the Panjtar record of fourteen years earlier is probable; and here, again, I think Dr. Fleet may be correct in identifying the latter with Vima-Kadphises. On the other hand, it is also possible that Kujula-Kadphises may be meant. The monogram on the scroll is characteristic of coins of Vima- Kadphises, but it is also found on coins of his predecessor.1 1 Cf. Vincent Smith, Catalogue of Coins in the Indian Museum, p. 67, Nos. 17, 22, 24. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. INSEAD, on 06 Mar 2018 at 11:08:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00047444 978 THE DATE OF KANISHKA Again, the title maharajasa rajatirajasa also suggests Vima-Kadphises ; indeed.it was stated by several speakers during the discussion on the date of Kanishka that Kujula-Kadphises was only a petty local chief (yavuga = jabgou), never " a king of kings ", like his successor. But this assertion is erroneous. On some of his coins Kujula- Kadphises styles himself maharaja rajadirajasa,1 and, according to Cunningham, devaputrasa also.2 That lie ruled, moreover, at Taxila, and consequently over the north-west of the Punjab and Frontier generally, is abundantly clear from his coins, which are found there in larger numbers than those of any other kings except Azes I and Azes II.3 Other considerations, too, favour the identification with Kujula- rather than Vima- Kadphises.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electrum Vol 22 2 Łam.Indd 227 2015-12-22 13:47:12 228 NIKOLAUS SCHINDEL
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 22 (2015): 227–248 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.15.012.3950 www.ejournals.eu/electrum SAKASTAN IN THE FOURTH AND FIFTH CENTURY AD. SOME HISTORICAL REMARKS BASED ON THE NUMISMATIC EVIDENCE Nikolaus Schindel Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien* Abstract: This article discusses the Sasanian coinage from the region of Sakastan during the latter part of the 4th and the 5th century AD. Only through a comprehensive collection of material and a detailed re-evaluation of already examined coins was it possible to reconstruct a continuous se- ries of Sakastan coins stretching from Ardashir II (379–383) to Wahram V (420–438). The impli- cations of this numismatic evidence for our understanding of the history of Sakastan in this period are discussed in some detail, also taking into account further numismatic data from Eastern Iran. Key words: Sasanian history, Sasanian numismatics, Sakastan, Eastern Iran. Introduction Having already dealt with the Sasanian mints in Khurasan during the 5th century,1 a clos- er look at the neighbouring region of Sakastan not only completes the picture, but also – as I hope to be able to show – adds to the larger picture of Iranian and Eastern Iranian history in several respects. To separate the material presentation which, as it is, rests on a safe (even if small) material basis, represented by Sasanian coins, from the necessarily more hypothetical historical conclusions, I will fi rst present and discuss the numismatic material available to me, and then consider what we can learn from it for our knowledge of Eastern Iran in the 4th and 5th centuries AD.
    [Show full text]
  • EASAA 2005 Handbook of Papers and Panels
    EASAA 2005 Handbook of Papers and Panels List of Panels Mind the Gap: Continuity and Change in South Asian Archaeology (Monday July 4 2.00 – 5.00) Convenors: Prof. Robin Coningham (University of Bradford) & Dr. Ruth Young,( University of Leicester) Ethnoarchaeology in the Himalayas (Monday July 4 2.00 – 5.00) Convenors: Lindsay Zamponi (Ph.D Candidate, SOAS, London) and Dr. Tadeuz Skorupski (SOAS, London) Indo•Iranian Borderlands (Monday July 4 1.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Morteaza Hessari (National Museum of Iran) & Prof. Vasant Shinde (Deccan College, Pune) Technology, Regional Interaction and the Indus Civilisation (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Prof. Mark Kenoyer (University of Wisconsin•Madison) & Dr. Rita Wright (Deparment of Anthropology, New York University) The Temple in South Asia (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Dr. Adam Hardy (University of Cardiff) & Dr. Crispin Branfoot (De Montfort University) Issues in Gangetic Archaeology (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 12.30) Convenor: Robert Harding (UCL Institute of Archaeology Numismatic, Literary and Epigraphic Evidence on Chronology in Gandhara (Tuesday July 6 9.30 – 5.00) Convenor: Dr. Osmund Bopearachchi (C.N.R.S.) Issues in Northwestern Art and Iconography (Tuesday July 5 2.00 – 5.00 Convenors: Dr. Martha L. Carter, Dr. Carolyn Schmidt Tibetan Epigraphy and Petroglyphs (Tuesday 5 July 2.00 – 5.00) Convenor: Dr. Philip Denwood (SOAS, London) Economies in South Asia (Wednesday July 6 9.30 – 4.30) Convenors: Dorian Q. Fuller: Institute of Archaeology, University College London & Dr. Richard Meadow: Director, Harappa Archaeological Project, Peabody Museum, Harvard University) The Hephthalites (Wednesday July 6 9.30 – 4.30) Convenors: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heritage of India Series
    THE HERITAGE OF INDIA SERIES T The Right Reverend V. S. AZARIAH, t [ of Dornakal. E-J-J j Bishop I J. N. FARQUHAR, M.A., D.Litt. (Oxon.). Already published. The Heart of Buddhism. K. J. SAUNDERS, M.A. Asoka. J. M. MACPHAIL, M.A., M.D. Indian Painting. PRINCIPAL PERCY BROWN, Calcutta. Kanarese Literature, 2nd ed. E. P. RICE, B.A. The Samkhya System. A. BERRIEDALE KEITH, D.C.L., D.Litt. Psalms of Maratha Saints. NICOL MACNICOL, M.A., D.Litt. A History of Hindi Literature. F. E. KEAY, M.A., D.Litt. The Karma-MImamsa. A. BERRIEDALE KEITH, D.C.L., D.Litt. Hymns of the Tamil Saivite Saints. F. KINGSBURY, B.A., and G. E. PHILLIPS, M.A. Rabindranath Tagore. E. J. THOMPSON, B.A., M.C. Hymns from the Rigveda. A. A. MACDONELL, M.A., Ph.D., Hon. LL.D. Gotama Buddha. K. J. SAUNDERS, M.A. Subjects proposed and volumes under Preparation. SANSKRIT AND PALI LITERATURE. Anthology of Mahayana Literature. Selections from the Upanishads. Scenes from the Ramayana. Selections from the Mahabharata. THE PHILOSOPHIES. An Introduction to Hindu Philosophy. J. N FARQUHAR and PRINCIPAL JOHN MCKENZIE, Bombay. The Philosophy of the Upanishads. Sankara's Vedanta. A. K. SHARMA, M.A., Patiala. Ramanuja's Vedanta. The Buddhist System. FINE ART AND MUSIC. Indian Architecture. R. L. EWING, B.A., Madras. Indian Sculpture. Insein, Burma. BIOGRAPHIES OF EMINENT INDIANS. Calcutta. V. SLACK, M.A., Tulsi Das. VERNACULAR LITERATURE. and K. T. PAUL, The Kurral. H. A. POPLBY, B.A., Madras, T> A Calcutta M. of the Alvars.
    [Show full text]
  • Note on the Historical Results Deducible from Recent Discoveries in Afghanistan Henry Thoby Prinsep
    University of Nebraska Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Books in English Digitized Books 1-1-1844 Note on the historical results deducible from recent discoveries in Afghanistan Henry Thoby Prinsep Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/afghanuno Part of the History Commons, and the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Prinsep, Henry Thoby Note on the historical results deducible from recent discoveries in Afghanistan. London: W.H. Allen and Co., 1844. vi, 124 page, 17 plates This Monograph is brought to you for free and open access by the Digitized Books at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books in English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE ON THE f HISTORICAL RESULTS, DISCOVERIES IN AFGBANI8TAN. H. T. PRINSEP, ESP. LONDON: WM. H. ALLEN AND CO., 7, LEADENHALL STmET. - 1844. W. I.ICW19 AND SON, PRINTERS, PINCH-LANE, LONDON. PREFACE. THE Public are not unacquainted vith the fact, that dis- coveries of much interest have recently been made ia the regions of Central Asia, which were the seat of Greelr do- minion for some hundred years after their conquest byAlex- ander. These discoveries are principally, but not entirely, nunismatic, and have revealed the names of sovereigns of Greek race, and of their Scythian, and Pa~thiansuccessors, of none of whom is any mention to be found in the extant histories of the East or West. There has also been opencd to the curious, through these coins, a lan- guage, the existence of which was hithcrto unknown, and which must have been the vernacular dialect of some of the regions in which the Grecian colonies were established.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art
    Rienjang and Stewart (eds) Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art Edited by Wannaporn Rienjang Peter Stewart Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art Since the beginning of Gandhāran studies in the nineteenth century, chronology has been one of the most significant challenges to the understanding of Gandhāran art. Many other ancient societies, including those of Greece and Rome, have left a wealth of textual sources which have put their fundamental chronological frameworks beyond doubt. In the absence of such sources on a similar scale, even the historical eras cited on inscribed Gandhāran works of art have been hard to place. Few sculptures have such inscriptions and the majority lack any record of find-spot or even general provenance. Those known to have been found at particular sites were sometimes moved and reused in antiquity. Consequently, the provisional dates assigned to extant Gandhāran sculptures have sometimes differed by centuries, while the narrative of artistic development remains doubtful and inconsistent. Building upon the most recent, cross-disciplinary research, debate and excavation, this volume reinforces a new consensus about the chronology of Gandhāra, bringing the history of Gandhāran art into sharper focus than ever. By considering this tradition in its wider context, alongside contemporary Indian art and subsequent developments in Central Asia, the authors also open up fresh questions and problems which a new phase of research will need to address. Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art is the first publication of the Gandhāra Connections project at the University of Oxford’s Classical Art Research Centre, which has been supported by the Bagri Foundation and the Neil Kreitman Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Coins
    • Classical Numismatic Group Sale 32 Wednesday· December 7, 1994 • 2 PM in conjunction with the NEW YORK INTERNATIONAL A Public & Mail Bid Sale of AV Greek' Roman Republican • Roman Imperial' Byzantine' World' British Also incll/ding a mail bid only section of books featl/ring tIle Numismatic Library of Dr. Frank J. Novak OUR CURRENT LIST' XIX, 4 • OUT October 24, 1994 Tlw Classical Numismatic Review Featuring over 500 coins at fixed prices Holiday edition of our Book List also available Write for a complimentary copy of both Catalogue with prices realized $15/£10. Contact either our U.s. or U.K office. Seaby Coins Eric J. McFadden, Senior Director 14 Old Bond Street London WIX 4JL, United Kingdom (0171) 495-1888, Fax (0171) 499-5916 Classical Numismatic Group, Inc. Victor England, Senior Director Post Office Box 479 (j) Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17608-0479 (j). (717) 390-9194, Fax (717) 390-9978 • INSIDE THE CELATOR... Vol. 8, No. 11 FEATURES November 1994 6 Astrological omens commemorated The CeitlToJ( on Roman coins: The Ides of March Incorporating Roman Coins and Culture by Michael R . Molnar Publisner/Senior Editor Wayne G. Sayles 16 Sasanian bronze coins Editor minted in Alexandria Steven A. Sayles Page 6 by Ed Dobbins Office M anager The Ides of March by Michael R. Molnar Stephanie Schultz 34 The case of the curious coin of Production Ass t. Caligula: A provincial bronze Nick Popp restruck with legend-only dies M I Parnell Nelson by Thomas P. McKenna The Cefator (ISSN 1# 10480986) is an 45 The sword of peace independent journal by Norman A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Point in Palaeography
    1041 MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS. A POINT IN PALAEOGRAPHY. My recognition of the letter H'with the value ^instead of M, m, on the coins of a certain ruler in Northern India (see page 1029 above), has removed the difficulty in the way of finding identically the same name on both the obverse and the reverse of the coins. The Indian legend in KharoshthI characters on the reverse gives the name as Kharaosta; as also do the inscriptions A. and E. oil the1 Mathura lion-capital (page 1025 f.). The Greek legend on the obverse had been taken as giving the name Kharamostis (Cunningham), Kharamosta (Buhler and B.apson)j or Charamostis (V. Smith): and, the question of identity, both of name and of person, had been argued on both sides,— the chief difficulty being the supposed M. That question is now settled by my reading, XAPAHLJCTEly in the place of the previously accepted XAPAMLUCTEI. This gives us,; against Kharaosta as the native form of the name,1 a Greek form, Kharahostes, which exactly matches it except for the h, which was probably inserted because, otherwise, the alpha and omega, coming together, might be pronounced as- au, aw. • ' :..; .....',.' There is no room for doubt about this matter.; On the coin presented by Rapson in this Journal, 1905. 814, plate, fig. 9, the word is XAf AHU/CTEt • There is no question of reading a given M as meaning H —h in order to serve a purpose: we simply take asi H = h an undeniable H which 1 The third syllable seems to be distinctly o, not ho, both in the inscriptions and on the coins.
    [Show full text]
  • Posthumous Azes Coins in Stupa Deposits from Ancient Afghanistan
    Posthumous Azes Coins In stupa deposits from ancient Afghanistan ONS 2 March 2013 ‘Donation of Śivarakṣita, son of Mujavada, offered with relics of the Lord, in honour of all buddhas’ Deposits from Bimaran 2 stupa with the gold casket and Posthumous Azes coins Courtesy of Piers Baker Shevaki Stupa, Kabul Courtesy of Piers Baker Shevaki Stupa from afar Courtesy of Piers Baker Guldara Stupa, Kabul The ‘Indo-Scythians’ kings and satraps in coin sequences (Based on Errington & Curtis 2007) Kings Satraps Basileos / Maharaja Satrap, Strategos / Chatrap Maues (c.75-65BC) Kharahostes (early 1st AD) Vonones (c.65-50BC) Zeionises (c.AD30-50) Spalyrises (c.50-40BC) Rajavula Azes I (c.46-1BC) Aspavarma (c.AD33-64)* Azilises (c.1BC-AD16) * With the name ‘Azes’ on the obverse Azes II (c.16-30AD) Indo-Scythian coins from Buddhist sites in ancient Pakistan and Afghanistan (Based on Errington 1999/2000) Swat Darunta/Jalalabad/ Peshawar Hadda Taxila Posthumous Azes Maues c.75-65BC Azilises c.1BC-AD16 Zeionises c.AD30-50 Vonones c.65-50BC Azes II c.AD16-30 Rajavula Azes I c.46-1BC Kharahostes early 1st AD Aspavarma c.AD33-64 Pontic to Central Asian steppes Iranian Plateau Arabia Nomadic and sedentary groups living in areas extending from the Pontic to Central Asian steppes during the first millennium BC ‘Σκυϑοι’ in Greek sources / ‘Sakas’ in Iranian sources ‘Śakas’ in Indian sources / ‘Sai’ or ‘Se’ in Chinese sources Three types of Sakas according to the Naqš-i-Rustam inscription of Darius I Sakas ‘who are across the sea’ (Saka Paradraya) The Pontic steppe
    [Show full text]
  • Sculpture of Mathura During the Reign of •Oîàsa (Ca
    CHAPTER SIX SCULPTURE OF MATHURA DURING THE REIGN OF •OÎÀSA (CA. 15 CE) Introduction: The Time of •o∂àsa The works of art discussed in this chapter were produced when Mathura was governed by a ruler whose name is actually known—a rare circumstance for the early periods cov- ered in this book. The ruler’s name is •o∂àsa, and he stands out as exceptional in the list of names of post-Mauryan, pre-Kußà»a potentates of Mathura, most of whom are known exclusively from local, faceless coinage. Unlike rulers such as Bràhmamitra, Ràmadatta, Hagàna, and Hagàmaßa who populate the murky political history of early Mathura, the name of •o∂àsa is found in several epigraphs, some of which accompany sculpture, as well as in coin legends. In one instance his name is even carved in stone with a date, the Year Seventy-Two, on the Amohini àyavati (Fig. 148), and in the Mathura lion cap- ital inscription (Figs. 213–215) his name appears along with the names of other individ- uals whose dates are known from other sources. This is far more information than we have about any of the other political leaders of Mathura before the Kußà»a emperor Kanißka. All of the evidence combines to uphold ca. 15 CE for the date of •o∂àsa, as most scholars have agreed over the years, in which case we have what is coveted by most historians of early Indian art: a benchmark date. Although the duration of •o∂àsa’s reign is not known for certain, we can be confident that he was in full power over Mathura in 15 CE and that his reign began sometime between 6 CE and 15 CE.
    [Show full text]
  • Rudradaman I (Reign 130 AD – 150 AD)
    Origins Scythians (referred to as Sakas in Indian sources) were a group of Iranian nomadic pastoral tribes. In the second century BC, central Asian nomadic tribes and tribes from the Chinese region invaded the region of present-day Kazakhstan whose inhabitants were Scythians. This promoted the Scythians to move towards Bactria and Parthia. After defeating the Parthian king, they moved towards India. Scythians who migrated to India are known as Indo-Scythians. The Sakas had an Indian kingdom larger than the Indo-Greeks. Maues (Reign 80 BC – 65 BC) Maues, also known as Moga was the earliest Indo-Scythian king. He ruled over Gandhara (present Pakistan and Afghanistan). He invaded the Indo-Greek territories but unsuccessfully. His capital was at Sirkap (Punjab, Pakistan). Many coins issued by Maues have been found. They contain Buddhist and also Hindu symbols. The languages used in these coins were Greek and Kharoshti. His son Azes I acquired the remaining Indo-Greek territories by defeating Hippostratos. Chastana (Reign 78 AD – 130 AD) He was a Saka ruler of the Western Kshatrapas (Satraps) dynasty who ruled over Ujjain. The Saka Era is believed to have started at his ascension to power in 78 AD. Ptolemy mentions him as “Tiasthenes” or “Testenes”. He was the founder of one of the two major Saka Kshatrapa dynasties in northwest India, the Bhadramukhas. The other dynasty was called Kshaharatas and included the king Nahapana (who was defeated by Satavahana king Gautamiputra Satakarni). Rudradaman I (Reign 130 AD – 150 AD) He is considered the greatest of the Saka rulers. He is from the Western Kshatrapa dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Mazdooano, the Gracious One, Kushan God on a Gold Dinara of Kanishka I (Coin )
    Mazdooano, the gracious one, Kushan god on a gold dinara of Kanishka I (Coin ). Kushan, Kushano-Sasanian, and Kidarite Coins A Catalogue of Coins From the American Numismatic Society David Jongeward and Joe Cribb with Peter Donovan THE AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY NEW YORK Introduction Nearly all the , coins documented in this catalogue of the ANS collection of Kushan coins were donated to the Society: Table . Principal Sources (fve or more coins) of Kushan coins in the American Numismatic Society ANS Accession Collection No. of coins . I. J. Greenwood . Valentine collection, gif of Mr. E.T. Newell . Columbia University . Ms. R. T. Barrington . K. Minassian . Mr. E. T. Newell . Sir John Marshall, purchased from Metropolitan Museum of Art . Purchased from A. F. McKenzie . Mrs. A. M. Newell . Metropolitan Museum of Art . F. Jacobs . G.C. Miles collection, gif of Mrs. J.R. McCredie . William Spengler . Marjorie D. Schwartz . William Spengler . Martha Carter . William Spengler . William Spengler . H. W. Herz . Harry Fowler . C. K. Panish . Mrs. Olivia Garvey Lincoln . Purchased from P. R. Donovan 2 Kushan, Kushano-Sasanian, and Kidarite Coins Map . Te Kushan World. Courtesy of Elizabeth Errington. A few coins have been purchased since the outset of the present catalogue project which began in . Kushan coin donations to the ANS commenced with the I. J. Greenwood bequest in . Subsequent donations include the collections of E. T. Newell in , a jointly donated collection from William Spengler and Dr. Martha Carter in , and a large collection of Kushan coppers from the Lincoln bequest in . Dr. Larry Adams, an ANS Trustee, has kindly permitted the authors to include ffy-four gold coins from his private collection, an intended gif to the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indo-Greeks the Greek in Bactria Greek Settlers Were Present in India
    The Indo-Greeks The Greek in Bactria Greek settlers were present in India, even at the time of Alexander’s invasion of India. An example is the Greek colony at Nysa. On the death of Alexander, Asian territories, to the east of Asia Minor, which had been conquered by him, fell into the share of Seleukos. Parthia and Bactrian formed two easternmost provinces of the Seleukid empire. Around the middle of the third century BC, Bactria revolted under its satrap, Diodotos I. About the same time, Parthia revolted under Arsakes I, a man of unknown antecedents. These revolts occurred during the reign of Antiochos II (261-246 BC). Neither Seleukos II (246-226 BC), nor Seleukos III (226-222 BC) was able to re- establish Seleukid authority over these provinces. Antiochos III (222-187 BC) marched against Parthia and Bactria. By that time, the reign of Diodotos I, and also of his son and successor, Diodotos II, had come to an end in Bactria. The Family of Euthydemos I When Antiochos III besieged Bactria, it was being ruled by Euthydemos, who was, perhaps, responsible for the end of the reign of Diodotos II. Antiochos III laid siege to Bactria, which continued for a long time, but produced no result. Polybios : Euthydemos sent a proposal for peace, through his son, Demetrios. Antiochos III was informed that Euthydemos had obtained kingship, not by revolting against the Seleukids, but by putting to death, the descendant (Diodotos II) of the original rebel (Diodotos I). Antiochos III was so impressed by Demetrios, that he decided to marry his daughter to the prince.
    [Show full text]