DOCSLIB.ORG

Waste Stream Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waste Stream Management Sustainability How-to Guide – Waste Stream Management Sustainability How-to Guide Series Waste Stream Management Bill Conley, CFM SFP, FMP, LEED, AP, IFMA Fellow Sharon Jaye, D.Ed., SFP Facility Manager Executive Director Yamaha Motor Corporation Green Schools Alliance Sustainability How-to Guide – Waste Stream Management 1 Sustainability How-to Guide – Waste Stream Management Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 ABOUT THE AUTHORS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 IFMA ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP , UTILITIES AND SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIC ADVISORY GROUP .................................................. 6 PART 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 PART 2 - INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Resource Management........................................................................................................................................................... 9 PART 3 - DETAILED FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Waste Management Concepts ............................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1.1 Waste Hierarchy ................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1.2 Zero Waste ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Life Cycle Assessment...................................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Waste Management Strategies ........................................................................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Reduction Strategies ........................................................................................................................................................................ 14 3.2.2 Reuse Strategies ............................................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.3 Recycling Strategies .......................................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.4 Recovery Strategies .......................................................................................................................................................................... 34 3.2.5 Disposal............................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 3.3 Waste Management Plan .................................................................................................................................................... 40 3.3.1 Environmental Management System ........................................................................................................................................... 41 3.3.2 Waste Audit ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 41 3.3.4 Designing and Implementing a Recycling Program .................................................................................................................. 44 3.3.5 Tracking and Documentation ........................................................................................................................................................ 45 3.3.6 Occupant Education and Training ................................................................................................................................................ 45 PART 4 - MAKING THE BUSINESS CASE ............................................................................................................................................... 48 PART 5 - CASE STUDIES ...................................................................................................................................................................... 50 5.1 Case Study #1........................................................................................................................................................................ 50 5.2 Case Study #2 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 51 5.3 Case Study #3 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 53 5.4 Case Study #4 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 56 5.5 Case Study #5 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 61 5.6 Case Study #6 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 62 PART 6 - APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Appendix A: Resources ............................................................................................................................................................... 65 Print Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Online Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 65 Appendix B: Fun Facts for Education Programs .................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix C: Glossary.................................................................................................................................................................. 69 Sustainability How-to Guide – Waste Stream Management 2 Sustainability How-to Guide – Waste Stream Management Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their gratitude to Maria Lazaruk with CR&R Inc., Chuck Boelkins and Dan Loudermilk with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Sustainability Division, Cindy Jackson with the Georgia Institute of Technology, and Gloria Hardegree with the Georgia Recycling Coalition for reviewing the article and lending their expertise as subject matter experts and external reviewers. Acknowledgement also is given to Susan Kidd and Justine Schwartz for the Agnes Scott College case study, Stephanie Busch and Susan Wood for the Georgia Department of Natural Resources case study, and Laurie Gilmer with Facility Engineering Associates for the corporate case study. The authors also wish to thank Kathy Walsh, Director, Business Waste Management, and Sustainability Consulting for her leadership on the 2016 update of this Guide. EExternalExxtternalernal RReviewerseviewers R. Charles Boelkins, Ph.D., Industrial Ecologist, Sustainability Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta, Ga., USA Laurie Gilmer, P.E., CFM, LEED AP, CxA, Associate, Facility Engineering Associates, P.C., Santa Rosa, Calif., USA Gloria Hardegree, Executive Director, Georgia Recycling Coalition, Atlanta, Ga., USA Cindy Jackson, Assistant Director, Office of Solid Waste Management & Recycling Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga., USA Maria Lazaruk, Senior Public Relations-Compliance Manager, CR&R Incorporated, Orange County, Calif., USA Dan Loudermilk, P.E., Sustainable Systems Engineer, Sustainability Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta, Ga., USA EEditorialditorial BoardBoard AAdvisorsdvisors Eric Teicholz, IFMA Fellow Bill Conley, IFMA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adams-Clermont Solid Waste District
    Adams-Clermont Solid Waste District Solid Waste Management Plan 2010 - 2030 I. Introduction This section contains the infonnation requested below presented in the manner shown. A. Plan Approval Date, Counties in District, and Planning Period Length 1. Under current approved (or ordered to be implemented) plan: Date of Ohio EPA approval or order to implement September 27, 2006 Counties within District Adams and Clennont Years in planning period 10 2. Plan to be implemented with approval of this document Counties within District Adams and Clennont Years in planning period 19 Year 1 of the planning period 2012 B. Reasons for Plan Submittal 1. Mandatory five-year plan update C. Process to Determine Material Change in Circumstances The District will consider the following as "material changes" that will require a Solid Waste Plan (SWP) revision. (1). When anticipated disposal capacity at regional solid waste management facilities is less than the anticipated District disposal requirements for the remaining planning period outlined in this plan, the District will revise the plan to address disposal capacity needs. Anticipated disposal capacity will include permitted disposal capacity, that capacity having the reasonable potential of being permitted, and other waste management alternatives the Board determines necessary to provide adequate capacity. The District Board of Directors will monitor the status of disposal capacity on an annual basis in order to determine capacity. If a capacity deficiency is identified, the Board will notify the District Policy Committee (DPC) to begin a plan revision and set a mutually agreed upon schedule for its completion. (2). Determining material changes related to facility designations, flow control, waste generation, strategies for waste reduction and/or recycling, available revenues, and other potentially related issues, including a time table for implementation will be made on an annual basis during the annual review of plan implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rumpke Monroe County Resource Recovery Facility Request for Determination of Need and Plan Consistency July 2020
    Rumpke Monroe County Resource Recovery Facility Request for Determination of Need and Plan Consistency Submitted to: Monroe County Solid Waste Management District July 2020 Prepared with Assistance of Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC Rumpke Waste & Recycling retained Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC (APTIM), to assist in the development of this Request for Determination of Need and Plan Consistency for the Rumpke Monroe County Resource Recovery Facility. APTIM’s expertise supplements the in-house capabilities of the Rumpke team, particularly with respect to assessing need for the proposed facility. APTIM’s core solid waste consulting expertise includes assisting units of government and private sector companies to plan for future waste management needs, prepare market assessments, plan and design waste and diversion facilities, navigate regulatory approval processes, and construct facilities of all types. The APTIM team assisting Rumpke on this project has developed 15 new or expanded transfer and recycling facilities in the past decade, with a design area exceeding 450,000 square feet and combined daily capacity of 17,000 tons. More broadly, they have experience on more than 185 transfer stations and recycling facilities across the U.S. with throughputs ranging from 50 tons per day to more than 3,000 tons per day. Many of these developments required demonstrating the need for the facility, just as Monroe County requires, and the APTIM team is expert in conducting needs assessments. Rumpke Monroe County Resource Recovery Facility Request for Determination of Need and Plan Consistency Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1.0 Rumpke Waste & Recycling: An Overview .............................................................................. 4 1.1 Rumpke’s Services ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landfill Gas to Energy Uses and Regulation in Brazil
    LANDFILL GAS TO ENERGY USES AND REGULATION IN BRAZIL LANDFILL GAS TO ENERGY USES AND REGULATION IN BRAZIL Editorial information: This report was written by multiple authors, including the following individuals: Matthew Gardner (National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners) Anne Goodge (Public Utilities Commission of Ohio) John Rogness (Kentucky Public Service Commission) Consultants from the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment Prepared by: This report was coordinated and organized by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) This publication was developed under Assistance Agreement No. XA834446 01 0 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners grantee and EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. Table of Contents LANDFILL GAS TO ENERGY USES AND REGULATION IN BRAZILLANDFILL GAS TO ENERGY USES AND REGULATION IN BRAZIL .......................................................................................................... 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................... 3 ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection at the Managed Solid Waste Landfill
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AT THE MANAGED SOLID WASTE LANDFILL Prepared by: 10220 Old Columbia Road, Suite A Columbia, Maryland 21046 Document No. MD10186 29 MARCH 2010 This page intentionally left blank Geosyntec Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER ................................................................. 1 DEFINITIONS AND LIST OF ACRONYMS ..................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1. OVERVIEW OF A MANAGED SOLID WASTE LANDFILL ..................................... 15 1.1 What is a Managed Solid Waste Landfill? ............................................................. 17 1.2 Key Elements of a Managed Solid Waste Landfill ................................................ 17 1.3 How is Environmental Performance Monitored? ...................................................... 19 1.4 What Happens Inside a Managed Solid Waste Landfill? .................................... 21 1.4.1 Treatment (Biodegradation) of Solid Waste .............................................. 21 1.4.2 Permanent Storage of Biogenic Carbon in Landfills (Sequestration) ..... 24 1.4.3 Development of a Leachate Biofilter in Bottom-Most Waste Layers ..... 24 1.4.4 Physical and Biogenic Settlement ................................................................. 25 2. REGULATORY OVERSIGHT OF MANAGED SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS .............. 26 2.1 Overview of Solid Waste Landfill Regulations ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 8/12/2019 Mr. John Butler Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc
    Mike DeWine, Governor Jon Husted, Lt. Governor Laurie A. Stevenson, Director 8/12/2019 Certified Mail No TOXIC REVIEW No PSD Mr. John Butler No SYNTHETIC MINOR TO AVOID MAJOR NSR Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. No CEMS 3990 Generation Drive Yes MACT/GACT Cincinnati, OH 45251 Yes NSPS No NESHAPS RE: FINAL AIR POLLUTION PERMIT-TO-INSTALL No NETTING No MAJOR NON-ATTAINMENT Facility ID: 1431092049 No MODELING SUBMITTED Permit Number: P0124272 No MAJOR GHG Permit Type: Administrative Modification No SYNTHETIC MINOR TO AVOID MAJOR GHG County: Hamilton Dear Permit Holder: Enclosed please find a final Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air Pollution Permit-to-Install (PTI) which will allow you to install or modify the described emissions unit(s) in a manner indicated in the permit. Because this permit contains several conditions and restrictions, we urge you to read it carefully. Because this permit contains conditions and restrictions, please read it very carefully. In this letter you will find the information on the following topics: How to appeal this permit How to save money, reduce pollution and reduce energy consumption How to give us feedback on your permitting experience How to get an electronic copy of your permit What should you do if you notice a spill or environmental emergency? How to appeal this permit The issuance of this PTI is a final action of the Director and may be appealed to the Environmental Review Appeals Commission pursuant to Section 3745.04 of the Ohio Revised Code. The appeal must be in writing and set forth the action complained of and the grounds upon which the appeal is based.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water and Methane Gas Sampling Results
    Closed Landfill Report Hamilton County, Ohio March 2017 Prepared by: Hamilton County Public Health Department of Environmental Health Services Waste Management Division Board of Health Kenneth Amend, M.D., President Mark Rippe, Vice President Jim Brett Thomas Chatham Tracey A. Puthoff, Esq. Timothy Ingram, Health Commissioner For more information, please contact: Hamilton County Public Health Department of Environmental Health Services 250 William Howard Taft, 2nd Floor Cincinnati, Ohio 45219 (513) 946-7800 www.hamiltoncountyhealth.org Disclaimer This report is generated based on a review of records and reflects limited environmental data collection by Hamilton County Public Health. This report is only a summary. The closed landfill files, in their entirety, are available for review at the offices of Hamilton County Public Health. This report is not intended to serve as a detailed environmental site assessment, and should not be used as such. Hamilton County Public Health encourages property owners, prospective buyers, or other interested parties to rely upon detailed site assessments performed by qualified professionals. Although this report is complete to the best of our knowledge, the absence of a site from this report is not conclusive evidence that it was never a dumpsite or landfill. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 2016 Sampling Summary 2 3.0 Closed Landfills 3 3.1 Amberley Village Landfill 3.2 Anderson Township Landfill 3.3 Carmical Landfill 3.4 Cheviot Landfill 3.5 Cincinnati Milacron Landfill 3.6 Crosby Township Civic
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton County Debris Management
    Functional Annex C-1 Hamilton County Debris Management Annex With Resource List 1 June 2015 Draft #5 Functional Annex C-1 I. INTRODUCTION Purpose The Hamilton County Debris Management Annex is intended to serve as a guidance document for use by officials of Hamilton County and officials of the political jurisdictions within the County. The purpose of this Annex is to: • Provide guidance to the communities of Hamilton County regarding the development of plans for the removal and disposition of debris caused by a major disaster. • Facilitate and coordinate the management of debris following a disaster in order to mitigate against any potential threat to the lives, health, safety, and welfare of the impacted citizens, expedite recovery efforts in the impacted area, and address any threat of significant damage to improved public or private property. II. SITUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS A. SITUATION 1. Natural and manmade disasters precipitate a variety of debris that include, but are not limited to, such things as trees, sand, gravel, building construction material, ve- hicles, personal property and hazardous materials. 2. The quantity and type of debris generated from any particular disaster will be a function of the location and kind of event experienced, as well as its magnitude, duration and intensity. 3. The quantity and type of debris generated, its location, and the size of the area over which it is dispersed will have a direct impact on the type of collection and dis- posal methods utilized to address the debris problem, associated costs incurred and how quickly the problem can be addressed. 4. In a major or catastrophic disaster, many state agencies and local governments could have difficulty in locating staff, equipment, and funds to devote to debris removal, in the short-term as well as long term.
    [Show full text]
  • An Io Division of Surface Water Southwest Ohio Air Quality Agency
    Division of Material and Waste Management Division of Surface Water Southwest Ohio Air Quality Agency ;anOhio Environmentaiio Protection Agency Response to Comments Projects: • Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Permit-to- Install (PTI) Lateral and Vertical Expansion (PTI 1221259) • Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (1IN00180*ID) • Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. Air Pollution Permit (P0124272) • GSF Energy, LLC Air Pollution Permit (P0125062) Re: Rumpke Sanitary Landfill; Permit — Long Term; Public Response; Municipal Solid Waste Landfills; Hamilton County; MSWL018791 Contacts for these Projects: Michael Harris Sarah Harvey Division of Materials and Waste Management Division of Surface Water (937) 285-6089 (937) 285-6444 Brad Miller Southwest Ohio Air Quality Agency (513) 946-7777 ., ~.w...,..,.;rCa7hamilton-co.orc Public Involvement Coordinator: Heather Lauer Public Interest Center (614) 644-2160 Heather. LauerC7a.eoa.ohio.gov Ohio EPA (Agency) held a public hearing on April 2, 2019, concerning several draft permits issued to Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. (Rumpke) regarding a vertical and Iateral expansion of the Rumpke Sanitary Landfill located in Hamilton County. This document summarizes the comments and questions received at the public hearing and during the associated comment period, which ended on April 9, 2019. Ohio EPA reviewed and considered all comments received during the public comment period. By law, Ohio EPA has authority to consider specific issues related to protection of the environment and public health. Often, public concerns fall outside the scope of that authority. For example, concerns about zoning issues are addressed at the local Ievel. Ohio EPA may respond to those concerns in this document by identifying another government agency with more direct authority over the issue.
    [Show full text]