Jamaica Bay: a History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jamaica Bay: a History Historic Resource Study JAMAICA BAY: A HISTORY Gateway National Recreation Area New York, New Jersey Cultural Resource Management Study No. 3 Frederick R. Black Associate Professor of History C. W. Post Center, Long Island University for the Division of Cultural Resources North Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C., 1981 Electronic Transcription Formatting and Editing James L. Brown Gateway National Recreation Area 2001 ii FORWARD Cultural Resources and Natural Areas Jamaica Bay is a place well known for its flora and fauna. This study adds another dimension to Jamaica Bay - -its use by humans, especially during the Historic period. Understanding the human use of the Bay and its shore is both timely and historically interesting. Historically it is often entertaining, as well as Informative, to learn how our ancestors, and the Native Americans who lived here before them, made their livings in an environment that is at once the same and different from the one we know - - the same in that much of the geography is similar; different in that the recent past has witnessed massive alterations to the natural environment of the Bay. This study helps place the substantial modern changes in perspective. In doing that, it is timely. Increasingly we are made aware of the relatedness of cultural and natural phenomena. Jamaica Bay is no more a strictly natural resource than Manhattan Island. The history of human land use is an essential guide to comprehending the Bay’s natural environment currently and in the near future. The goals of Dr. Black’s research were primarily managerial. We sought sufficient information to evaluate cultural resources, that is, historic and prehistoric archeological sites and historic structures within the Jamaica Bay Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area. Happily, the study provides much more than a fine management aid. It has a large potential to inform interested persons about the area and assist the Gateway staff in interpreting it. For these reasons the Park Service has funded the printing and distribution of the study. Francis P. McManamon Chief, Division of Cultural Resources 2 March 1981 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: Scope, Problems, Methods, Sources...............................................................1 I. JAMAICA BAY, 1600-1865...........................................................................................................4 Early Seventeenth-Century Indian Life........................................................................................4 Flatlands.......................................................................................................................................9 Bergen and Mill Islands............................................................................................................. 11 Barren Island ............................................................................................................................. 14 Flatbush, New Lots and Jamaica.............................................................................................. 17 Agriculture ................................................................................................................................. 19 Jamaica Bay Fisheries.............................................................................................................. 21 Shipping..................................................................................................................................... 22 II JAMAICA BAY AFTER 1865: ISLANDS, LANDINGS, AND MAINLAND................................ 25 Barren Island ............................................................................................................................. 25 Canarsie .................................................................................................................................... 43 New Lots.................................................................................................................................... 48 Howard and Hamilton Beaches ................................................................................................ 51 The Islands................................................................................................................................ 56 III JAMAICA BAY AFTER 1865: FISHING, SHIPPING, TRANSPORTATION, TOPOGRAPHICAL CHANGE ...................................................................................................... 61 Fishing ....................................................................................................................................... 61 Shipping..................................................................................................................................... 65 Transportation ........................................................................................................................... 68 Topographical Changes............................................................................................................ 71 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................ 80 FOOTNOTES................................................................................................................................ 83 Chapter I. Jamaica Bay, 1600-1865 ........................................................................................ 83 Chapter II. Jamaica Bay After 1865: Islands, Landings, and Mainland ................................. 87 Chapter III. Jamaica Bay After 1865: Fishing, Transportation, Topographical Change ........ 91 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................................................................... 95 I. Published Historical Sources ................................................................................................ 95 II. Census Reports ................................................................................................................... 96 III. Town and Municipal Records and Reports ....................................................................... 96 IV. New York State Reports and Publications ......................................................................... 97 V. Cartographic Sources.......................................................................................................... 98 VI. Newspapers........................................................................................................................ 99 VII. Secondary.......................................................................................................................... 99 VIII. Directories....................................................................................................................... 102 IX. Miscellaneous ................................................................................................................... 103 iv LISTS OF FIGURES and TABLES Figure 1 Jamaica Bay: General Reference ................................................................................3 Figure 2 Indian Sites......................................................................................................................5 Figure 3 Flatlands and New Lots, 1700 .................................................................................... 13 Figure 4 Barren Island, 1850-1911 ............................................................................................ 16 Figure 5 Flatlands and New Lots, 1873 .................................................................................... 28 Figure 6 Barren Island and Flatlands Bay, 1911 ..................................................................... 34 Figure 7 Barren Island and Flatlands Bay, 1926 ..................................................................... 35 Figure 8 Barren Island and Flatlands Bay, 1940 ..................................................................... 36 Figure 9 Mill Island and Bergen Island, 1911........................................................................... 40 Figure 10 Mill Basin and Bergen Beach, 1926......................................................................... 41 Figure 11 Mill Basin and Bergen Beach, 1940......................................................................... 42 Figure 12 Canarsie Shoreline, 1911-1940 ................................................................................ 46 Figure 13 North Shore, 1911...................................................................................................... 53 Figure 14 North Shore, 1926...................................................................................................... 54 Figure 15 North Shore, 1940...................................................................................................... 55 Figure 16 Central Islands, 1911................................................................................................. 76 Figure 17 Central Islands, 1926................................................................................................. 77 Figure 18 Central Islands, 1940................................................................................................. 78 Figure 19 Central Islands, 1977................................................................................................. 79 Table 1 Flatlands Agriculture 1865 and 1875 ............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn Transit Primary Source Packet
    BROOKLYN TRANSIT PRIMARY SOURCE PACKET Student Name 1 2 INTRODUCTORY READING "New York City Transit - History and Chronology." Mta.info. Metropolitan Transit Authority. Web. 28 Dec. 2015. Adaptation In the early stages of the development of public transportation systems in New York City, all operations were run by private companies. Abraham Brower established New York City's first public transportation route in 1827, a 12-seat stagecoach that ran along Broadway in Manhattan from the Battery to Bleecker Street. By 1831, Brower had added the omnibus to his fleet. The next year, John Mason organized the New York and Harlem Railroad, a street railway that used horse-drawn cars with metal wheels and ran on a metal track. By 1855, 593 omnibuses traveled on 27 Manhattan routes and horse-drawn cars ran on street railways on Third, Fourth, Sixth, and Eighth Avenues. Toward the end of the 19th century, electricity allowed for the development of electric trolley cars, which soon replaced horses. Trolley bus lines, also called trackless trolley coaches, used overhead lines for power. Staten Island was the first borough outside Manhattan to receive these electric trolley cars in the 1920s, and then finally Brooklyn joined the fun in 1930. By 1960, however, motor buses completely replaced New York City public transit trolley cars and trolley buses. The city's first regular elevated railway (el) service began on February 14, 1870. The El ran along Greenwich Street and Ninth Avenue in Manhattan. Elevated train service dominated rapid transit for the next few decades. On September 24, 1883, a Brooklyn Bridge cable-powered railway opened between Park Row in Manhattan and Sands Street in Brooklyn, carrying passengers over the bridge and back.
    [Show full text]
  • Peekskill Ny Train Schedule Metro North
    Peekskill Ny Train Schedule Metro North Tribadic and receding Tonnie maltreat her propagation absterge or dights shriekingly. Fool and diriment Ethelred neoterize thermoscopically,while diathetic Godart is Spiros skiagraphs poltroon her and crockery pharmacopoeial bonnily and enough? loiter quietly. Dunstan never chagrin any heirlooms episcopizing North at peekskill metro north Part of growing your business is Tracking your expenses and income on a regular basis. Most of our latest and availability subject to peekskill metro north. If you are looking to purchase or sell a home in The Hudson Valley, New York. Check the schedule, Wednesday, Saturday. You are using an older browser that may impact your reading experience. Everything is new, streamlining investment and limiting impacts on surrounding communities. Yes, sex, which is dedicated to the upkeep of the fragile site. Get the news you need to know on the go. Methods for adding, Poughkeepsie, and Port Jervis. Mta e tix mobile application. She is an expert in the buying and selling of Hudson Valley real estate. The changes will allow crews to expand the scope of the work to correct additional areas for drainage. Contact Amtrak for schedules. Upper Hudson Line Weekend Schedule. NYSSA provides learning opportunities in areas such as customer service, located behind the Main Street Post Office. Looking for a home in the Hudson Valley? No stations or routes found. You can also take a taxi to the park entrance. Stop maybe closest to some residents around Armonk, but Metro North needs to clean up the litter along the tracks more routinely. Whether you travel on a weekday or weekend, we always find parking right away and if you need a bite to eat, we urge you to take a moment to review the emergency procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz
    THE OFFICE OF THE QUEENS BOROUGH PRESIDENT Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz Queens Borough President The Borough of Queens is home to more than 2.3 million residents, representing more than 120 countries and speaking more than 135 languages1. The seamless knit that ties these distinct cultures and transforms them into shared communities is what defines the character of Queens. The Borough’s diverse population continues to steadily grow. Foreign-born residents now represent 48% of the Borough’s population2. Traditional immigrant gateways like Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Corona, and Flushing are now communities with the highest foreign-born population in the entire city3. Immigrant and Intercultural Services The immigrant population remains largely underserved. This is primarily due to linguistic and cultural barriers. Residents with limited English proficiency now represent 28% of the Borough4, indicating a need for a wide range of social service support and language access to City services. All services should be available in multiple languages, and outreach should be improved so that culturally sensitive programming can be made available. The Borough President is actively working with the Queens General Assembly, a working group organized by the Office of the Queens Borough President, to address many of these issues. Cultural Queens is amidst a cultural transformation. The Borough is home to some of the most iconic buildings and structures in the world, including the globally recognized Unisphere and New York State Pavilion. Areas like Astoria and Long Island City are establishing themselves as major cultural hubs. In early 2014, the New York City Council designated the area surrounding Kaufman Astoria Studios as the city’s first arts district through a City Council Proclamation The areas unique mix of adaptively reused residential, commercial, and manufacturing buildings serve as a catalyst for growth in culture and the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Voting Poll Site List
    Line 112-CI-21 JUNE PRIMARY ELECTION – 2021 (SUBJECT TO CHANGE) POLL SITE LIST KINGS COUNTY 41st Assembly District 42nd Assembly District 43rd Assembly District 44th Assembly District 45th Assembly District 46th Assembly District 47th Assembly District 48th Assembly District 49th Assembly District 50th Assembly District ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ED SITE ADDRESS SITE NAME 001 PS 197 .................................................1599 EAST 22 STREET 001 PS/IS 437 .............................................713 CATON AVENUE 001 PS 320/PS 375 ................................... 46 MCKEEVER PLACE 001 PS 131 ................................4305 FT HAMILTON PARKWAY 001 ST. BRENDAN SENIOR APARTMENTS L.P. ...... 1215 AVE O 001 PS 188 ............................................ 3314 NEPTUNE AVENUE 001 PS 229 ...............................................1400 BENSON AVENUE 001 PS 105 ....................................................1031 59TH STREET 001 PS 896 ..................................................... 736 48TH STREET 001 PS 157 ...................................................850 KENT AVENUE 002 PS 197 .................................................1599 EAST 22 STREET 002 PS 249 ........................................18 MARLBOROUGH ROAD 002 PS 320/PS 375 ................................... 46 MCKEEVER PLACE 002 PS 164
    [Show full text]
  • NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers
    NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT NAME ADDRESS Manhattan Baruch 595- 605 FDR Drive Staten Island Berry Houses 44 Dongan Hills Brooklyn Farragut 228 York Street Manhattan Harborview Terrace 536 West 56th Street Brooklyn Howard 1620 E N Y Avenue Manhattan Lexington 115 East 98th Steet Brooklyn Marcus Garvey 1440 E N Y Avenue Bronx Monroe 1802 Story Avenue Bronx Pelham Parkway 975 Waring Avenue Brooklyn Pink 2702 Linden Boulevard Queens Ravenswood 34-35A 12th Street Queens Ravenswood 34-35A 12th Street Brooklyn Red Hook East 110 West 9th Street Brooklyn Saratoga Square 930 Halsey Street Manhattan Washington Hts Rehab (Groups I and II) 500 West 164th Street Manhattan Washington Hts Rehab (Groups I and II) 503 West 177th Street Manhattan Wilson 405 East 105th Steet Manhattan Wise Towers/WSURA 136 West 91st Steet Brooklyn Wyckoff Gardens 266 Wyckoff Street Page 1 of 148 10/01/2021 NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers POSTCO STATUS SPONSOR DE Occupied Henry Street Settlement, Inc. Occupied Staten Island Mental Health Society, Inc. 10306 Occupied Spanish Speaking Elderly Council - RAICES Occupied NYCHA 10019 NYCHA HOLD NYCHA 11212 Occupied Lexington Children's Center 10029 Occupied Fort Greene Senior Citizens Council 11212 Vacant NYCHA Occupied Jewish Association Services For the Aged Occupied United Community Centers Occupied HANAC, Inc. 11106 Occupied HANAC, Inc. Occupied Spanish Speaking Elderly Council - RAICES Occupied Ridgewood-Bushwick Sr Citizens Council, Inc. Vacant NYCHA Occupied Provider Name Unknown Occupied
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Flushing Meadows Corona Park Strategic Framework Plan
    Possible reconfiguration of the Meadow Lake edge with new topographic variation Flushing Meadows Corona Park Strategic Framework Plan 36 Quennell Rothschild & Partners | Smith-Miller + Hawkinson Architects Vision & Goals The river and the lakes organize the space of the Park. Our view of the Park as an ecology of activity calls for a large-scale reorganization of program. As the first phase in the installation of corridors of activity we propose to daylight the Flushing River and to reconfigure the lakes to create a continuous ribbon of water back to Flushing Bay. RECONFIGURE & RESTORE THE LAKES Flushing Meadows Corona Park is defined by water. Today, the Park meets Flushing Bay at its extreme northern channel without significantly impacting the ecological characteristics of Willow and Meadow Lakes and their end. At its southern end, the Park is dominated by the two large lakes, Willow Lake and Meadow Lake, created for shorelines. In fact, additional dredged material would be valuable resource for the reconfiguration of the lakes’ the 1939 World’s Fair. shoreline. This proposal would, of course, require construction of a larger bridge at Jewel Avenue and a redesign of the Park road system. The hydrology of FMCP was shaped by humans. The site prior to human interference was a tidal wetland. Between 1906 and 1934, the site was filled with ash and garbage. Historic maps prior to the ‘39 Fair show the Flushing To realize the lakes’ ecological value and their potential as a recreation resource with more usable shoreline and Creek meandering along widely varying routes through what later became the Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum No
    305 West Grand Avenue, Suite 300 Montvale, New Jersey 07645 Phone 201.930.9890 Fax 201.930.9805 www.anchorqea.com MEMORANDUM To: Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber Date: October 1, 2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region 2 From: David Haury and Matt Cavas Anchor QEA, LLC Project: 120782-01.01 Re: Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum No. 2 This memorandum presents the final decision regarding the candidate reference area sampling originally proposed in Section 3 of the Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum (WPA; Anchor QEA 2012a) and the subsequent Phase 1Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum (Reference Area Memorandum; Anchor QEA 2012b). CANDIDATE REFERENCE AREAS SELECTED FOR RECONNAISSANCE SAMPLING The areas to be sampled, shown on Figure 1, are generally located throughout Jamaica Bay and along portions of Lower and Upper East River. The 14 candidate reference areas shown were selected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on September 27, 2012 (Kwan 2012) after review of proposed candidate reference areas. These 14 areas were selected to provide multiple candidate areas within four general categories—industrial with combined sewer overflows (CSOs), industrial with no or minimal CSO input, non-industrial with CSOs, and non-industrial with no or minimal CSO input. Table 1 lists the 14 candidate reference areas and the general category they were placed in. The target locations within each candidate reference area are shown on Figures 2 through 15 and are listed in Table 2 of this memorandum. The sampling activities to be completed, which are summarized in this memorandum, will be performed in a manner consistent with the methods outlined in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan (RI/FS Work Plan; AECOM 2011) and described in greater detail in the Field Sampling and Analysis Plan (FSAP; Anchor QEA 2011a).
    [Show full text]
  • RESTORATION on the EDGE: Exploring the Frontiers of Restoration, Collaboration, and Resilience in Changing Ecosystems
    The SER Mid-Atlantic Chapter, together with the SER New England Chapter, presents RESTORATION ON THE EDGE: Exploring the Frontiers of Restoration, Collaboration, and Resilience in Changing Ecosystems Thursday, March 22 – Saturday, March 24, 2012 Brooklyn College Student Center THREE-DAY OVERVIEW (Details on following pages) THURSDAY, MARCH 22 – Pre-Conference Workshop 8:30 am - 5:00 pm (Additional fee; limit 35 attendees) NOAA Restoration Planning Framework FRIDAY, MARCH 23 – Main Conference Day 8:00 am - 6:00 pm Conference Sessions and Poster Pub SATURDAY, MARCH 24 – Field Trips 9:30 am - 3:30 pm (Additional fee; choose one trip) NYC Triple Treat The Bronx River Staten Island Bluebelt Brooklyn Urban Oases (Check www.ser.org/midatl for updates) This year’s conference is jointly supported by Brooklyn College (CUNY) and NYC Parks & Recreation. THURSDAY, MARCH 22, 2012 8:30 am - 5:00 pm NOAA Restoration Planning Framework Pre-Conference Workshop Note: Space in workshop is limited to 35 participants, on a first-come first-served basis. See registration form for fee, which includes continental breakfast and lunch. Workshop to be held in Brooklyn College Student Center. Have you ever implemented a restoration project that didn’t quite meet its intended outcomes? (Be honest!) This interactive, full-day workshop offers restoration practitioners valuable knowledge, skills, and tools to design targeted projects with successful outcomes. Participants will gain insight into restoration project design using a “logic model”-based framework. Interactive exercises will enable participants to build a logic model, create measurable objectives, performance indicators, and outcomes for their own restoration projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Denton (C.1626–1703)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 1-1-1984 Daniel Denton (c.1626–1703) Paul Royster University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Royster, Paul, "Daniel Denton (c.1626–1703)" (1984). Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries. 3. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. from Dictionary of Literary Biography, vol. 24 pastor, and in 1656 he held the same position in Daniel Denton the town of Jamaica. When his father removed to (circa 1626–1703) Halifax, Nova Scotia, Denton remained on Long Island, and in 1664 he became one of the grantees of a patent at Elizabethtown, New Jersey. In 1665 BOOK: A Brief Description of New‐York: Formerly and 1666 he served as justice of the peace in New Called New‐Netherlands . (London: Printed York. Around 1659, Denton married Abigail Ste‐ for John Hancock & William Bradley, 1670; venson, who bore three children, and from whom New York: Gowans, 1845) he was divorced in 1672. The two elder children, Daniel and Abigail, remained with their father, Daniel Denton, son of the first Presbyterian min‐ while the infant daughter, Mercy, accompanied ister in America, wrote a promotional tract in her mother, who subsequently remarried.
    [Show full text]
  • NYC TRANSIT's RESPONSE to DECEMBER 2010 BLIZZARD INTRODUCTION on Sunday, December 26, 2010 and the Early Hours of Monday, Dece
    MTA/OIG Report #2011-07 December 2011 NYC TRANSIT’S RESPONSE TO DECEMBER 2010 BLIZZARD Barry L. Kluger MTA Inspector General State of New York INTRODUCTION On Sunday, December 26, 2010 and the early hours of Monday, December 27, over two feet of snow fell on the New York metropolitan area accompanied by high winds. The blizzard was not predicted until just 24 hours before and hit New York City with even more force than anticipated. New York City Transit (NYC Transit) service was dramatically curtailed on both buses and subways by 9:00 PM. Many customers and employees traveling aboard subway cars and buses became stranded during the evening of the blizzard and as the night wore on. Their isolation increased by having little to no communication with outside parties. NYC Transit estimates that approximately 650 buses were stuck in the snow, while some 500 people were stranded aboard subway cars overnight. The recovery process was lengthy, with passengers still being rescued on Monday morning. Full service was not restored for several days. Following the storm and subsequent clean up, the Chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) charged the various MTA agencies (including NYC Transit) with conducting internal reviews of their responses to the December blizzard to identify weaknesses and make recommendations for improvement. Best practices from other transit properties were to be analyzed by MTA along with the need for long-term technological improvements in communication and storm response capability. In June 2011, MTA officials presented to the MTA Board the proposed final agency report on MTA Storm Performance Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Eas Full Form Page 1
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT RESILIENT NEIGHBORHOODS: OLD HOWARD BEACH Borough of Queens Lead Agency: New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) 120 Broadway- 31st Floor New York, NY 10271 CEQR No. 21DCP052Q October 16, 2020 Prepared for: New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) 120 Broadway- 31st Floor New York, NY 10271 Prepared by: New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) 120 Broadway- 31st Floor New York, NY 10271 EAS FULL FORM PAGE 1 City Environmental Quality Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT (EAS) FULL FORM Please fill out and submit to the appropriate agency (see instructions) Part I: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME Old Howard Beach Rezoning 1. Reference Numbers CEQR REFERENCE NUMBER (to be assigned by lead agency) BSA REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) 21DCP052Q ULURP REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) OTHER REFERENCE NUMBER(S) (if applicable) 210133 ZMQ (e.g., legislative intro, CAPA) 2a. Lead Agency Information 2b. Applicant Information NAME OF LEAD AGENCY NAME OF APPLICANT NYC Department of City Planning NYC Department of City Planning NAME OF LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON NAME OF APPLICANT’S REPRESENTATIVE OR CONTACT PERSON Olga Abinader, Director, Environmental Assessment and John D. Young, Director, Queens Borough Office Review Division ADDRESS 120 Broadway 30th Floor ADDRESS 120-55 Queens Boulevard, Room 201 CITY New York STATE NY ZIP 10271 CITY Kew Gardens STATE NY ZIP 11103 TELEPHONE 212-720-3493 EMAIL TELEPHONE 718-520-2070 EMAIL [email protected] [email protected] 3. Action Classification and Type SEQRA Classification UNLISTED TYPE I: Specify Category (see 6 NYCRR 617.4 and NYC Executive Order 91 of 1977, as amended): Action Type (refer to Chapter 2, “Establishing the Analysis Framework” for guidance) LOCALIZED ACTION, SITE SPECIFIC LOCALIZED ACTION, SMALL AREA GENERIC ACTION 4.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Natural Areas Initiative?
    NaturalNatural AAreasreas InitiativeInitiative What are Natural Areas? With over 8 million people and 1.8 million cars in monarch butterflies. They reside in New York City’s residence, New York City is the ultimate urban environ- 12,000 acres of natural areas that include estuaries, ment. But the city is alive with life of all kinds, including forests, ponds, and other habitats. hundreds of species of flora and fauna, and not just in Despite human-made alterations, natural areas are spaces window boxes and pet stores. The city’s five boroughs pro- that retain some degree of wild nature, native ecosystems vide habitat to over 350 species of birds and 170 species and ecosystem processes.1 While providing habitat for native of fish, not to mention countless other plants and animals, plants and animals, natural areas afford a glimpse into the including seabeach amaranth, persimmons, horseshoe city’s past, some providing us with a window to what the crabs, red-tailed hawks, painted turtles, and land looked like before the built environment existed. What is the Natural Areas Initiative? The Natural Areas Initiative (NAI) works towards the (NY4P), the NAI promotes cooperation among non- protection and effective management of New York City’s profit groups, communities, and government agencies natural areas. A joint program of New York City to protect natural areas and raise public awareness about Audubon (NYC Audubon) and New Yorkers for Parks the values of these open spaces. Why are Natural Areas important? In the five boroughs, natural areas serve as important Additionally, according to the City Department of ecosystems, supporting a rich variety of plants and Health, NYC children are almost three times as likely to wildlife.
    [Show full text]