DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biodiversity Chapter 5 Biodiversity Coordinating Lead Authors: Jeffrey A. McNeely, Daniel P. Faith, Heidi J. Albers Lead Authors: Ehsan Dulloo, Wendy Goldstein, Brian Groombridge, Hiroji Isozaki, Diana Elizabeth Marco, Steve Polasky, Kent Redford, Elizabeth Robinson, Frederik Schutyser Contributing Authors: Robin Abell, Salvatore Arico, Robert Barrington, Florent Engelmann, Jan Engels, Pablo Eyzaguirre, Paul Ferraro, Sofia Hirakuri, Toby Hodgkin, Joy Hyvarinen, Pierre Ibisch, Devra Jarvis, Alphonse Kambu, Valerie Kapos, Izabella Koziell, Yumiko Kura, Sarah Laird, Julian Laird, Merab Machavariani, Susan Mainka, Thomas McShane, Vinod Mathur, K.S. Murali, Sergio Pen˜a-Neira, Adrian Phillips, William Powers, Asha Rajvanshi, Ramanatha Rao, Carmen Revenga, Belinda Reyers, Claire Rhodes, Klaus Riede, John Robinson, Pedro Rosabal Gonzales, Marja J. Spierenburg, Kerry ten Kate Review Editors: Gerardo Ceballos, Brian Huntley, Sandra Lavorel, Stephen Pacala, Jatna Supriatna Main Messages . ............................................ 122 5.1 Introduction ........................................... 123 5.1.1 Biodiversity Values and Relationship to Ecosystem Services 5.1.2 Local, National, Regional, and Global Biodiversity Values 5.1.3 Goals, Main Points, and Structure of this Chapter 5.1.4 Links to Multilateral Processes 5.2 Assessing Protected Areas as a Response to the Loss of Biodiversity 125 5.2.1 Introduction 5.2.2 Management of Protected Areas 5.2.3 Design of Protected Areas 5.2.4 Regional and Global Planning for PA Systems 5.2.5 Assessment 5.3 Helping Local People to Capture Biodiversity Benefits ........... 131 5.3.1 Economic Incentives: Indirect versus Direct 5.3.2 Importance of Community-based Responses and Implementation 5.3.3 Assessment 5.4 Promoting Better Management of Wild Species as a Conservation Tool................................................. 137 5.4.1 Legislation and Policy Action 5.4.2 Ecological Management and Reintroduction 5.4.3 Sustainable Use Programs 5.4.4 Communication/Awareness Raising 5.4.5 Ex Situ Management 5.4.6 Assessment 5.5 Integrating Biodiversity into Regional Planning ................. 141 5.5.1 Introduction 5.5.2 Integration of Regional Response Strategies 5.5.3 Linking Protected Areas to the Landscape 5.5.4 Assessment 119 ................. 11430$ $CH5 10-21-05 14:09:37 PS PAGE 119 120 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Policy Responses 5.6 Encouraging Private Sector Involvement in Biodiversity Conservation .......................................... 145 5.6.1 What Companies Are Doing 5.6.2 What More Needs to Be Done 5.6.3 Assessment 5.7 Including Biodiversity Issues in Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries ............................................. 147 5.7.1 Introduction 5.7.2 Agriculture 5.7.3 Forestry 5.7.4 Marine Reserves, Biodiversity, and Fisheries 5.7.5 Assessment 5.8 Designing Governance Approaches to Support Biodiversity ....... 152 5.8.1 Introduction 5.8.2 Examples of Governance Approaches in Biodiversity Conservation 5.8.3 Assessment 5.9 Promoting International Cooperation through Multilateral Environmental Agreements ............................... 153 5.9.1 Key Factors Leading to Effective Implementation of Treaties 5.9.2 Overcoming the Limitations 5.9.3 Assessment 5.10 Education and Communication ............................. 159 5.10.1 The Case for Education and Communication 5.10.2 Constraints Regarding the Use of Education and Communication 5.10.3 Conditions for Success in Communication 5.10.4 Assessment 5.11 Lessons Learned ....................................... 161 5.11.1 Introduction 5.11.2 How ‘‘Biodiversity’’ Is Addressed in Responses 5.12 Research Priorities ..................................... 163 5.12.1 How Does Biodiversity Underpin Ecosystem Services and Human Well- being? 5.12.2 What Patterns of Biodiversity Represent Value for the Future? 5.12.3 How Can Biodiversity Values Be Quantified? 5.12.4 What Are the Social Impacts of Biodiversity Loss? 5.12.5 How Do Human Actions Affect Biodiversity and the Structure and Function of Ecosystems? 5.12.6 How Can Effective Incentives Be Designed for Conserving Biodiversity? 5.12.7 Who Gets to Make Decisions Affecting Biodiversity? 5.12.8 When Is It Better to Integrate or to Segregate Human and Conservation Activity? REFERENCES .............................................. 165 ................. 11430$ $CH5 10-21-05 14:09:37 PS PAGE 120 Biodiversity 121 BOXES 5.8 The Bolivian National Strategy for Biodiversity Conservation 5.1 Benefits from Protected Areas: Marine Examples 5.9 Assessing Carbon Sequestration as a Conservation 5.2 Komodo National Park, Indonesia Response in the Andes 5.3 A Direct Approach: Costa Rica’s El Programa de Pago de FIGURES Servicios Ambientales 5.1 Global Network of Protected Areas 5.4 Community-managed Forests in India 5.5 Addressing Biodiversity Issues in Environmental Impact TABLES Assessment 5.1 Business Sectors with Direct Relevance to Biodiversity 5.6 How Multilateral Environmental Agreements Affect Rural Conservation Poverty 5.2 Selected Provisions Related to Implementation and 5.7 The Convention on Biological Diversity Enforcement of International Environmental Agreements ................. 11430$ $CH5 10-21-05 14:09:38 PS PAGE 121 122 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Policy Responses Main Messages Response strategies based on capture of benefits by local people from one or more components of biodiversity (for example, products from sin- Biodiversity is the variety of all forms of life, including genes, species, and gle species or from ecotourism) have been most successful when they ecosystems. Biodiversity underpins ecosystem services: biological resources have simultaneously created incentives for the local communities to supply all of our food, much of our raw materials, and a wide range of goods make management decisions consistent with (overall) biodiversity con- and services, plus genetic materials for agriculture, medicine, and industry. servation. Response strategies designed to enhance the local benefits derived Biodiversity has value for current uses, possible future uses (option val- from a few biological resources also seek to promote management for broader ues), and intrinsic worth. Biodiversity conservation ensures future provi- biodiversity conservation (including protection of global values). But even when sion of un-named or ‘‘undiscovered’’ services, and so complements a product is potentially well-linked to overall biodiversity (as in benefits from direct maintenance of recognized ecosystem services. biodiversity prospecting) the actual benefits may not flow to the community, which results in inadequate incentives for conservation management. Alterna- Recent decades have witnessed significant loss of biodiversity, at a rate two tively, conservation payments can create economic incentives for such man- to three times faster than has occurred in geological history. Responses to this agement. Overall, long-term success for these response strategies depends crisis focus on the conservation of biodiversity and on the associated problems on meeting the economic needs of communities whose livelihoods already of sustainable use of biological resources and equitable sharing of benefits depend to varying degrees on biological resources and the ecosystem services arising out of the use of genetic resources. Effective biodiversity response biodiversity supports. strategies have a bearing on human well-being in two ways: (1) they conserve a source of current and future goods and services, and (2) they Management and sustainable use of wild species, with direct links to create synergies and trade-offs of biodiversity conservation with other livelihoods, will remain a key response. Targeted protection of particular needs of society, including sustainable use of biological resources. species has had mixed success in protecting overall biodiversity. Reintro- duction of species, though often very expensive, has been successful, but such success generally will require the consent and support of the people Assessments covering a wide range of responses highlight several overarching inhabiting the target area. Control or eradication of an invasive species once it issues. One is that difficulties in measuring biodiversity make response is established has appeared extremely difficult and costly. Prevention and early design difficult, and complicate assessments of the impact of responses. intervention have been shown to be more successful and cost-effective. Suc- The potential benefits of integrating biodiversity conservation with management cessful prevention requires increased efforts in the context of international and planning for environmental services are substantial, but few examples of trade, and in raising awareness. Sustainable use programs must include con- successful implementation exist and measurement problems make assess- sideration of social and economic issues as well as the intrinsic biological and ment of gains uncertain. Few well-designed empirical analyses assess even ecological considerations related to the specific resource being used. Zoos, the most common biodiversity conservation measures. botanical gardens, aquaria, and other ex situ programs build support for con- servation, support valuable research, and provide cultural benefits of biodiver- Measurement and valuation of biodiversity requires attention to local, regional, sity. and global scales. Biodiversity may be valued differently, and generate human well-being differently, at local versus global scales. Focusing ex- Incorporating biodiversity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Urban Reconciliation Ecology: the Potential of Living Roofs and Walls
    Journal of Environmental Management 92 (2011) 1429e1437 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Environmental Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvman Review Urban reconciliation ecology: The potential of living roofs and walls Robert A. Francis*, Jamie Lorimer Department of Geography, King’s College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK article info abstract Article history: Reconciling human and non-human use of urban regions to support biological conservation represents Received 1 September 2009 a major challenge for the 21st century. The concept of reconciliation ecology, by which the anthropogenic Received in revised form environment may be modified to encourage non-human use and biodiversity preservation without 3 September 2010 compromising societal utilization, potentially represents an appropriate paradigm for urban conserva- Accepted 7 January 2011 tion given the generally poor opportunities that exist for reserve establishment and ecological restora- Available online 9 February 2011 tion in urban areas. Two habitat improvement techniques with great potential for reconciliation ecology in urban areas are the installation of living roofs and walls, which have been shown to support a range of Keywords: Reconciliation ecology taxa at local scales. This paper evaluates the reconciliation potential of living roofs and walls, in particular Living roof highlighting both ecological and societal limitations that need to be overcome for application at the living wall landscape scale. We further consider that successful utilization of living roofs and walls for urban green roof reconciliation ecology will rely heavily on the participation of urban citizens, and that a ‘citizen science’ urban ecosystem model is needed to facilitate public participation and support and to create an evidence base to deter- Citizen science mine their effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Perspective on Sustainable Agriculture
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272307886 Productive Landscapes: a Global Perspective on Sustainable Agriculture Article in Landscapes · June 2014 DOI: 10.1179/1466203514Z.00000000024 CITATIONS READS 7 296 1 author: Erika Guttmann-Bond 34 PUBLICATIONS 321 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Rediscovering Sustainability: How archaeology can save the planet View project Identification of intensive early agriculture (plaggen soils) using PIXE analysis View project All content following this page was uploaded by Erika Guttmann-Bond on 01 September 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. landscapes, Vol. 15 No. 1, June, 2014, 59–76 Productive Landscapes: a Global Perspective on Sustainable Agriculture Erika Guttmann-Bond University of Wales, Trinity Saint David The connections between agriculture and landscape are well established in western perceptions. Agricultural landscapes in the Western world have, however, become increasingly industrialised and low in biodiversity, and the standard practice in developed countries is to grow large fields of single crops sprayed with pesticides and herbicides. Many leading agronomists believe that such industrial methods are the only way we will succeed in feeding a growing global population. However, many opposing agronomists argue that agroecology is a more productive and efficient use of land. This paper is a review of archaeological, environmental and ethnographic evidence for sustainable agricultural land management, as it has been practiced in the past, and as it is practiced today in countries that use traditional, pre-industrial methods. A range of evidence demonstrates that small, biodiverse farms are more productive per hectare than agribusinesses that practice monocropping.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa—Serious About Biodiversity Science Michael Cherry
    Open access, freely available online Feature South Africa—Serious about Biodiversity Science Michael Cherry n 1772, Carolus Linnaeus wrote a letter, now oft-quoted, now exceeds the $16 million it receives from its parliamentary to Ryk Tulbagh, the Governor of the Cape—in which he grant and from entrance fees paid by the million or so visitors Ienvied Tulbagh’s “sovereign control of that Paradise on to its gardens each year. Huntley is optimistic that this brief Earth, the Cape of Good Hope, which the benefi cent Creator can succeed, although he concedes that in few countries has enriched with his choicest wonders”. Two and a half does any single institution bear responsibility for research, centuries later, South Africa’s biodiversity remains a great information dissemination, and applications relating to source of interest to the scientifi c community—and for good biodiversity. But he believes that South Africa is a small reason (Box 1). Plant biodiversity, with over 20 000 different enough country, with enough good intellectual capacity, for species, is in the foreground: South Africa, which comprises this model to work. less than 1% of the world’s land surface, contains 8% of its This view is echoed by Andrew Balmford of Cambridge plant species. Perhaps less well known is that the country also University, who is spending a sabbatical at the Percy contains 7% of all bird, mammal, and reptile species, and Fitzpatrick Institute for African Ornithology at the University 15% of known coastal marine species. of Cape Town. “While the obvious challenge is to link biodiversity conservation to development needs”, he says, The South African National Biodiversity Institute “there are very few developing countries which have the South Africa’s new Biodiversity Act, signed on September prospect of delivering jobs related to the conservation 1, 2004, expands the mandate of the National Botanical industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme in the Making
    Monday 12th September 2016 14:00 ‐ onwards: arrive at leisure – book‐in (Camp reception) 16:00‐18:00: Registration (Conference venue) 18:00‐20:00: Ice‐breaker (Conference venue) Tuesday 13th September 2016 05:30‐08:00: Breakfast (own arrangements) / Game Drive 07:00‐08:00: Registration (Conference venue) 08:00‐09:00 Official Opening 08:00‐08:20 Bob Millar & Brian Huntley 08:20‐08:50 Nigel Bennett 50 years of MRI Mammal Research Theme 1: People and Wildlife (Coordinator: Bob Millar) 08:50‐09:20 Chantell Ilbury (Mindofafox) INVITED TALK The socio‐economic landscape over the next two decades: implications for national parks and conservation 09:20‐09:50 Albert van Jaarsveld (University of KwaZulu‐Natal) INVITED TALK Integrative mammalogy 09:50‐10:20 Morne du Plessis (WWF) INVITED TALK A sub‐Saharan perspective on conservation challenges for southern African mammals over the next two decades 10:20‐10:50 Tea / Coffee Break 10:50‐11:20 Johan du Toit (Utah State University) INVITED TALK Adaptive management of large wild mammals and livestock in Anthropocene ecosystems 11:20‐11:50 Corey Bradshaw (University of Adelaide) INVITED TALK Current and future human population pressures on mammals in southern Africa 11:50‐12:20 Elissa Cameron (University of Tasmania & University of Canterbury) INVITED TALK Getting the balance right for mammal research and conservation 12:20‐12:40 Ken Maggs (SANParks) INVITED TALK Combatting poaching in the Kruger National Park 12:40‐13:40 Lunch (Students to be allocated to mentor tables) 13:40‐13:50 Ken Findlay (Cape Peninsula
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use
    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola
    Chapter 15 The Mammals of Angola Pedro Beja, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Luís Veríssimo, Elena Bersacola, Ezequiel Fabiano, Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ara Monadjem, Pedro Monterroso, Magdalena S. Svensson, and Peter John Taylor Abstract Scientific investigations on the mammals of Angola started over 150 years ago, but information remains scarce and scattered, with only one recent published account. Here we provide a synthesis of the mammals of Angola based on a thorough survey of primary and grey literature, as well as recent unpublished records. We present a short history of mammal research, and provide brief information on each species known to occur in the country. Particular attention is given to endemic and near endemic species. We also provide a zoogeographic outline and information on the conservation of Angolan mammals. We found confirmed records for 291 native species, most of which from the orders Rodentia (85), Chiroptera (73), Carnivora (39), and Cetartiodactyla (33). There is a large number of endemic and near endemic species, most of which are rodents or bats. The large diversity of species is favoured by the wide P. Beja (*) CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal CEABN-InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] P. Vaz Pinto Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] L. Veríssimo Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola e-mail: [email protected] E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Training Guide for in Situ Conservation On-Farm
    A Training Guide for In Situ Conservation On-farm Version 1 D.I Jarvis, L. Myer, H. Klemick, L. Guarino, M. Smale, A.H.D. Brown, M. Sadiki, B. Sthapit and T. Hodgkin SWISS AGENCY FOR DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION SDC IDRC Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs Development Cooperation Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit, Germany IPGRI is a Centre A Training Guide for In Situ Conservation On-farm Version 1 D.I Jarvis, L. Myer, H. Klemick, L. Guarino, M. Smale, A.H.D. Brown, M. Sadiki, B. Sthapit and T. Hodgkin With the collaboration of : S. Achtar P. Eyzaguirre T. Quinones-Vega A. Amri D. Fanissi K. R’hrib L. Arias-Reyes M. Fernandez R. Rana Z. Asfaw E. Friis-Hansen V. Ramanatha Rao G. Ayad D. Gauchan D. Rijal J. Bajracharya N.P. Ha K. Riley R. Balaghi N.N. Hue J. Rodriguez D. Balma M. Ibnou-Ali R. Salazar B. Baniya K. Joshi E. Sauri-Duch M.O. Belem O. Kabore M. Sawasogo A. Birouk S. Khatiwada R. Sevilla-Panizo A. Bouizgaren A. King K.K. Sherchand P. Bramel-Cox D. Lope-Alzina A. Subedi S. Brush M. Mahdi M. Taghouti L. Burgos-May I. Mar A. Tan J. Canul-Ku F. Marquez-Sanchez A. Teshome F. Castillo-Gonzalez P.N. Mathur I. Thorman S. Ceccarelli H. Mellas H.Q. Tin P. Chaudhary N.K. Motiramani P. Tiwari J.-L. Chavez-Servia C. Morales-Valderrama L.N. Trinh V. Cob-Vicab A. Mudwari R. Tripp P.H. Cuong F. Nassif M. Upadhyay N.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State University Libraries
    )ORULGD6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\/LEUDULHV 2020 Planning Strategies for Improving Resilience of Cities in Developing Countries to the Urban Heat Island Caroline Lucienne Knowles Follow this and additional works at DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PUBLIC POLICY PLANNING STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING RESILIENCE OF CITIES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES TO THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT By CAROLINE KNOWLES A Thesis submitted to the Department of International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring, 2020 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Caroline Knowles defended on April 13, 2020. Dr. John Felkner Thesis Director Dr. Janet Dilling Outside Committee Member Dr. William Butler Committee Member Dr. Christopher Coutts Committee Member Abstract With climate change and global warming, the detrimental socio-economic impacts of Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect are increasing, with cities in developing countries particularly vulnerable. This thesis conducts a literature review to identify the causes, socio-economic impacts, and urban planning mitigation strategies that can be used against the UHI effect. Further, this research focuses on the specific UHI impacts, consequences, best mitigation strategies and particular challenges for cities in developing countries, addressing a notable gap in the literature on these dimensions. Several key impacts of UHI are noted, including lower economic productivity, heightened public health risks, and increased energy consumption. Specific vulnerabilities of cities in developing areas are also identified. These include dependence on environmentally linked industries, disadvantageous geographic location, and rapid rates of urbanization.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Orbital Climatic Variability and Centres of Biological Diversity In
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 27 May 2014 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Huntley, B. and Midgley, G.F. and Barnard, P. and Valdes, P.J. (2014) 'Suborbital climatic variability and centres of biological diversity in the Cape region of southern Africa.', Journal of Biogeography., 41 (7). pp. 1338-1351. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12288 Publisher's copyright statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Huntley, B., Midgley, G. F., Barnard, P., Valdes, P. J. (2014), Suborbital climatic variability and centres of biological diversity in the Cape region of southern Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 41 (7): 13381351 which has been published in nal form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12288. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk 1 Original Article: 2 Sub-orbital climatic variability and centres of biological diversity in 3 the Cape region of southern Africa 1* 2,3 2,4 5 4 Brian Huntley , Guy F.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts and Presenter Biographical Information Oral Presentations
    ABSTRACTS AND PRESENTER BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ORAL PRESENTATIONS Abstracts for oral presentations and biographical information for presenters are listed alphabetically below by presenting author’s last name. Abstracts and biographical information appear unmodified, as submitted by the corresponding authors. Day, time, and room number of presentation are also provided. Abatzoglou, John John Abatzoglou, Assistant Professor of Geography, University of Idaho. Research interests span the weather-climate continuum and both basic and applied scientific questions on past, present and future climate dynamics as well as their influence on wildfire, ecology and agriculture and is a key player in the development of integrated climate scenarios for the Pacific Northwest, US. Oral presentation, Wednesday, 2:30 PM, B114 Will climate change increase the occurrence of megafires in the western United States? The largest wildfires in the western United States account for a substantial portion of annual area burned and are associated with numerous direct and indirect geophysical impacts in addition to commandeering suppression resources and national attention. While substantial prior work has been devoted to understand the influence of climate, and weather on annual area burned, there has been limited effort to identify factors that enable and drive the very largest wildfires, or megafires. We hypothesize that antecedent climate and shorter-term biophysically relevant meteorological variables play an essen- tial role in favoring or deterring historical megafire occurrence identified using the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Atlas from 1984-2010. Antecedent climatic factors such as drought and winter and spring temperature were found to vary markedly across geographic areas, whereas regional commonality of prolonged extremely low fuel moisture and high fire danger prior to and immediately following megafire discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity of Novel Ecosystems: a Literature Review
    Portland State University PDXScholar Environmental Science and Management Faculty Publications and Presentations Environmental Science and Management 2018 The Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity of Novel Ecosystems: A literature review Cody Evers Portland State University, [email protected] Chloe Wardropper University of Idaho Benjamin Branoff University of Puerto Rico-Río Piedras Elise F. Granek Portland State University, [email protected] Shana Hirsch University of Idaho See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/esm_fac Part of the Environmental Policy Commons, and the Environmental Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Evers, C. R., Wardropper, C. B., Branoff, B., Granek, E. F., Hirsch, S. L., Link, T. E., ... & Wilson, C. (2018). The ecosystem services and biodiversity of novel ecosystems: A literature review. Global Ecology and Conservation, e00362. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Science and Management Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Cody Evers, Chloe Wardropper, Benjamin Branoff, Elise F. Granek, Shana Hirsch, Timothy E. Link, Sofia Olivero-Lora, and Codie Wilson This article is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/esm_fac/235 Global Ecology and Conservation 13 (2018) e00362 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Review Paper The ecosystem services and biodiversity of novel ecosystems: A literature review * Cody R.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue D'ethnoécologie, 6
    Revue d’ethnoécologie 6 | 2014 Conservation de la nature : quel rôle pour les sciences sociales ? Reconciliation ecology, from biological to social challenges L'écologie de la réconciliation, du défi biologique au défi social Denis Couvet and Frédéric Ducarme Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1979 DOI: 10.4000/ethnoecologie.1979 ISSN: 2267-2419 Publisher Laboratoire Eco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie Electronic reference Denis Couvet and Frédéric Ducarme, « Reconciliation ecology, from biological to social challenges », Revue d’ethnoécologie [Online], 6 | 2014, Online since 31 December 2014, connection on 05 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1979 ; DOI : 10.4000/ethnoecologie.1979 This text was automatically generated on 5 May 2019. Revue d'ethnoécologie est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Reconciliation ecology, from biological to social challenges 1 Reconciliation ecology, from biological to social challenges L'écologie de la réconciliation, du défi biologique au défi social Denis Couvet and Frédéric Ducarme Introduction : Biodiversity alterations and reconciliation ecology 1 The most common representation of « nature » or « biodiversity » is often big charismatic animals like tigers, whales or remote wildernesses such as African savannahs (Ballouard et al. 2011). Threats of losses of such biodiversity have been of primary concern, especially as they are irreversible. Genes and species on the verge of extinction have been at the forefront of biodiversity conservation policies. A major policy trend in this domain has been the creation of protected areas. Such conservation policies have had some success, reducing the rate of species loss (i.e.
    [Show full text]