Vm
ftRM
f¼ INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS LIMITED (Incorporated in the ACT) IPA REVIEW ISSN 0019 0268 Vol. 41 No. 2 August-October 1987
6 The Rat Pack 64 An Economic Bill of Rights Gerard Henderson President Reagan proposes to reinforce the It prides itself on the independence, incisive- political freedoms guaranteed in the Ameri- ness and critical powers of its members—but can Constitution with economic freedoms. even the Canberra Press Gallery has its blind spots. 14 Debt: the Real Implications Des Moore The true nature of Australia s debt crisis is not widely appreciated. What we have borrowed IPA Indicators is less important than how we have spent it. 3 Which AustralianAustralia companies recorded the losses 1n8 c p 18 Peacemaking—No Child s Play Editorial Rita H. Joseph 5 The Labor Government must face some hard Peace educators have acted reprehensibly in decisions if it is to get the economy right. loading their own fear and panic about an impending nuclear holocaust onto the Defending Australia shoulders of children. 22 Harry Gelber Deadlier than War The neglect of foreign affairs and security 24 issues in the recent election campaign reveals R. J. Rummel the unreality of Australia s view of the world. Absolutist governments—especially commu- nist governments—have proved a far greater 38 Map: Advance of Democracy threat to life than war. In ten years ten countries in Latin America and the Caribbean Basin have become demo- 31 Handbooks for Good Government cracies. Michael James Two Australian think-tanks have produced 40 Focus on Figures quite different policy strategies for reducing Jacob Abrahami government. Australians drink more, drive more and depend on government more than they did 40 Review s 40th Birthday years ago. 35 It s a very different looking journal now, but from it s inception Review has occupied a 47 Ten Conservative Principles respected position in public debate. Russell Kirk An eminent Philosopher for Freedom illumi- 43 Public Service or Political Service nates the art of the possible. Les McCarrey Governments around Australia are sacrific- 59 Around the States ing the independence of the public service to Les McCarrey the interests of the party. If the founding fathers had foreseen current levels of taxing and spending, federation 52 The Capture of the Welfare State might never have happened. Delia Hendrie and Michael Porter The current welfare system serves the inter- 62 Strange Times ests of some people, but rarely those most in Ken Baker s further tributes to New Age need. Awareness. 56 Privatization a la Francais IPA Councils Prime Minister Chirac is breaking with the 46 long-time French tradition of asserting the superiority of the State in all things. 37 Subscription Advice
Editor-in-Chief Rod Kemp Editor.• Ken Baker
Advertising: Peggy Nicholls (03) 8301097 Review Office • . Articles and Letters Production Assistant: Fiona Macaulay 6th Floor, Unsolicited manuscripts should be accompanied by Circulation: Laura Johnson (03) 614 2029 83 William Street, a stamped, addressed return envelope. Distribution: Melbourne, 3000 Letters to the Editor should be kept to no more than Gordon Gotch Ltd. 300Vie words. TYP esettin S• DudleyY E. Kingg Pty.Y Ltd. Views expressed in the publications ofthe Institute of Printing: Wilke Company Ltd. Phone: (03) 614 2029 - Public Affairs Limited are those of the authors and Design: Bob Calwell Associates Facsimile: (03) 62 4444 do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute.
The IPA Review was established in 1947 by Charles Kemp, founding Director of the IPA. i T E B I C E N T E N N I A L BHP AWARDS F R THE PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE
MORE THAN EVER, WE NEED AUSTRALIANS GRANT. AND A SEVENTH AWARD, FOR YOUTH, WILL WHO STRIVE, AUSTRALIANS WHO INSPIRE CARRY A GRANT OF $10000 AND THE TROPHY. OTHERS. BHP INVITES YOU TO ENTER, OR TO NOMINATE BHP SEEKS TO IDENTIFY AND REWARD SEVEN SOMEONE YOU THINK DESERVES TO BE ENTERED. SUCH REMARKABLE, BUT PERHAPS LITTLE - TO OBTAIN ENTRY DETAILS WRITE TO: KNOWN AUSTRALIANS. THE SECRETARIAT, BHP PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE
THEY WILL BE HONOURED WITH THE BICENTENNIAL GPO BOX 8003V MELBOURNE, VIC. 3001 BHP AWARDS FOR THE PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE. OR CALL AT OR PHONE THE BHP OFFICE IN YOUR
SIX AUSTRALIANS OUTSTANDING IN THE FIELDS OF STATE CAPITAL. TOLL FREE NUMBER (008)338 138,
COMMERCE, INDUSTRY AND MANAGEMENT; MELBOURNE 240 8084. COMMUNITY SERVICE AND WELFARE; ENVIRONMENT; ENTRIES CLOSE 2 OCTOBER, 1987. LITERATURE AND THE ARTS; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; austraIias AND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, WILL BE GIVEN THE BHP PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE TROPHY AND A $40000 0 BHP IPA INDICATORS
Increase in major crimes reported in Victoria Cost of loading a tonne of scrap metal in the USA: between 1945 and 1985-86: 1,060 per cent. Increase $3. In Britain: 64 cents. In Queensland: $15. in number of police over the same period: 303 per cent. Increase in population: 106 per cent. Estimated cost in 1978 of the new Parliament House in Canberra: $469 million (in 1987 dollars). Largest losses recorded by Australian companies in In 1987 $997.5 million. 1986: $619 million by the Victorian State Insurance Office, $221 million by the Victorian State Transport Authority and $140 million by the Fastest growth in part-time jobs between 1973 and Victorian Metropolitan Transit Authority. 1985 of all industrial countries: 6 per cent in Australia.
Proportion of Australian households relying on direct government benefits as their principal source Number of unpaid parking fines incurred by the of income in 1974: 13 per cent. Nigerian high commission in Britain in 1984: In 1984: 26 per cent. 108,000.
Number of military personnel in USA: 2,143,955. Number of domestic, maintenance, cleaning etc. In USSR: 5,130,000. staff per 100 in-patients in public hospitals: 91.8. In private hospitals: 51.5.
Ratio of generals to personnel in the US Army: 1:1,735. In Australia, for all Services: 1:500 Number of divorces in Australia, average per (approx.). annum 1971-1975: 17,348 (1.3 per thousand population). In 1986: 39,417 (2.5 per thousand population). Population of Afghanistan in December 1979: Number of dependent children of parents divorcing 13-14 million. In December 1986: 8 million. in 1986: 45,200. Proportion of marriages in 1986 in which one or Increase in working days lost due to strikes in the both partners were previously divorced: year to March 1987 compared with the year to 31 percent, March 1986: 23.2 per cent. Proportion of employees participating in strikes Proportion of all employees in Australia employed over the same period: 1:8. by Coles Myer, Australia s largest retailer one in 38. Wage growth in Australia in the latest twelve Profit made by Coles Myer in each dollar of sale: months: 4.9 per cent Average for Germany, Japan, less than 2 cents. USA: 2.4 per cent. Number of people apprehended by Coles Myer for shop stealing or fraudulent theft claims in the ii months to June 1987: 41,000. Most common sources of income used by addicts to buy heroin, in order sale of drugs; social security Number of robberies or break-ins suffered by Coles payments; employment or savings; property crime; Myer stores in the same period: 687. prostitution. Number of bomb threats: 235.
SOURCES;(1) Victorian Police Statistician, TheAge, May 15 1987; (2)Australian Business, May 13 1987;(3)Iohn r reebairn, Michael Porter and CIiffWalsh, Spending and Trcring: Australian Reform Options. Allen and Unwin, 1987; (4) Encyclopaedia Britannica Year Book, 1987; (5) Michael O Connor, Testing the Water, Australian Defence Association. 1987; (6) Encounter, April 1987; (7) ABS. Industrial Disputes Australia March 1987. Cat No. 6321.0, ABS, Employed Wage and Salary Earners A usrralia March Quarter 1987, Cat No. 6248.0 (B) The Economist, July 25 1987; (9) The Bureau ofCrime statistics and Research. Drugs and Crime, Phase Two, NSW 1987; (10) Liberal Party "Rort Report" BR 13 , May 22 1987; (11) The Auditor-General, Efficiency Audit Report, Parliament House Construction Project Management, June I987;(12) The Economist. July 41987;(13) The Spectator. May 21987;(14) Senate Select Committee on Private Hospitals and Nursing Homes, Pri rate Hospitals in Australia, April 1987; (15) ABS, Dirorces Australia 1986, Cat. No. 3307.0; ABS, Marriages Australia 1986, Ca t. No. 3306.0; (16) Brian Quinn, Managing Director and Chief Executive ofColes Myer Ltd., James Thompson Memorial Lecture, July 23 1987.
What can you expect from We never stop
the new LaserJet Series II Printer? asking
Everything. below. To do this, we used HP s new Because the LaserJet Series II ScanJet desktop scanner, MicroSoft Windows and Pagemaker from Aldus. ^:;; Svup Printer from Hewlett-Packard is the product of With support by more than 500 experience. It s a second of the most popular software generation printer from packages, the LaserJet Series II ® the company with the Printer can produce whatever type of world s largest installed business document you need. And base of laser printers. LaserJet Series II works with all Whatever your company s popular PCs. needs, the LaserJet Series II will In fact, with LaserJet Series II, deliver the performance you expect, only the low price is unexpected. at up to 8 pages/minute. Take a simple memo like the Soup letter we created with MicroSoft HEWLETT Word. As you can see, you can print 1v]] in a variety of formats and type styles [h PACKARD with our wide selection of LaserJet For more information, or the name of your fonts. nearest authorised HP dealer, phone: Or you can create a sophisticated Sydney: 8884444 Melbourne: 895 2895 t ^ Adelaide: 272 5911 Perth: 242 1414 combination of text and graphics. Brisbane: 3004133 Canberra: 516999 With additional plug-in memory, you MicroSoft is a registered trademark of can also produce fullpage 300 dpi MicroSoft Corp. Pagemaker is a U.S. graphics, like our Nuts form shown registered trademark of Aldus Corporation.
irj
uxe Assat^ent
^, y AY1g3l ^ F,.. spring 1 98T c gam"„ Wit ° ., M Blariltlu} F tI; Illinois 604 w4.s
° ,qty« °zh • t•StY ^^%. M . ^+wW^ haw peatt^M1 sM,C00`P ;411 0.^0„0 Haz@t11Ut V to a ior two P to m1zVTq ti I t^ uyl intctestt°4 St, t d w bat>dY `trl ^ANNfl Y s..OEsue . SG7dJ,^ SZ1 . t S7, a 54. / S 1959 - S9 QQpo00 S9. 1 sY ran aan.- t cr. tr.o 5991 eatP^11990l,aobelievetn^t8 yo c 1,y 1990• thcJ u an CloSc c p lc Cat^i " PO o G Crb_ to eCall i ut dMAknry^ t fiis 0, N le! r M 11 of las to A q centV- can u Ptt,ke affect YOu7 eW^ f t w th and P . thetix theIACFWy w,11 tt+i4 or 8owr he Amotica, SOUPS Yp° Vt"ding „^uS the habt^ ^t t ^n,a r Chestnut aero^i4 ,.nhudj a u l.. V• _, a Wlq• W F A. and it Send tstachto • gincetcly Ahm — thm R.1 i • L^ ■yaNSa ` Yh"o ^p°W.W r ` welk^ned S°uPCouncil 0. is
0 EDITORIAL
What Direction Now?
With its election victory, Labor assumes a heavy support for a centralized wage determination pro- responsibility for putting the economy right. cess, and its increased regulation of business, has The Government must first clearly acknow- made investment less profitable and more risky. ledge that the task is much greater than it has so far The growing taxpayers revolt is forcing Australian recognized. The wild fluctuations in assessment of Governments to put a cap on their revenue raising; the economic outlook and of required policies do but there is a need to go much further than this. not inspire confidence. Nor has the Opposition The Government would considerably enhance done a great deal better. In short, there has been a the prospects of sustained economic recovery if in lamentable failure to provide leadership. the forthcoming Budget it were to: • An acknowledgment of past mistakes would • clearly acknowledge the need for major structu- be a helpful start. After Mr. Keating s first Budget ral change involving a reduction in the size of in 1983 the IPA argued that "the Hawke Govern- government and in government "regulation". An ment has made critical errors in economic manage- announcement of targets for reducing Common- ment—budget policy and wages policy." The sub- wealth expenditure and the size of government sequent blow-out in Australia s external debt, pri- would be a useful start. For example, a reduction marily reflecting expansionary fiscal policies, and in the overall size of government equivalent to acceptance of wages growth inconsistent with three percentage points of GDP a year would achieving international competitiveness, confirms reduce the government sector to around 36 per that assessment. The Government should accept cent of GDP in 1989/90 compared with an esti- that the worsening terms of trade since early 1985 mated 42 per cent in 1987/88; have only brought forward the need to recognize • cut back strongly total public sector borrowings that over recent years the Australian economy has by recognizing its inability to control net State been on a declining path. sector borrowings and budgeting for a substan- That path has meant weakening growth in tial surplus on Commonwealth account. national disposable income, reflecting deteriorat- It should reject the "corporatist" approach ing productivity and investment. That in turn has inherent in the ACTU s Australia Reconstructed reflected a growth in Government that has wrought and in the Industrial Relations Bill shelved during unprecedented—and inappropriate —changes to the election campaign. Instead, the Government the structure of society and the economy. We have should recognize the need for a much more compe- become a society of consumers, living predomi- titive labour market, based on enterprise unions nantly for the present. It is scarcely surprising that which would allow a more internationally competi- interest rates and unemployment have over recent tive wage structure and would recognize the scope years moved to ever higher levels while the dollar for much needed productivity gains of the sort has fallen. Despite the Government s propaganda, achieved at enterprises such as SEQEB and Robe the depreciating dollar is scarcely an achievement: River. The time has come to accept that, while con- it reflects a loss of competitiveness that has increas- frontation is never desirable, acquiescence to union ingly forced a "bargain basement" sell-off of Aus- demands is not the road to peace and prosperity; it tralian assets. simply stimulates further demands while under- The Government s responses have been slow mining the long-term health of the economy. in coming and inadequate when they have come. At a time of great uncertainty internationally, Neither before nor during the election has the Gov- Australia urgently needs to reduce its vulnerability ernment provided any clear guidance as to its to external shocks and to build up its economic plans. This needs to be remedied. strength. The Government must put aside policies, The IPA has consistently argued that the main including the Australia Card, which divert atten- problem is the size ofgovernment itself. The explo- tion from the over-riding economic priorities. The sion of the public sector has reduced private sector way forward is to reduce dependency on govern- incentives to save and to work and increased incen- ment and encourage individual initiative, enter- tives to consume. The Government s continuing prise, and responsibility. THE RAT PACK that I might be aiming at some kind of hatchet job. public censures of the media had .left a mark. I But he conceded that he could not refuse an inter- recall, for example, a certain tension developing view. Kate Legge also predicted a demolition piece. with some of my interviewees when I raised the She actually mentioned some of my earlier essays question whether journalists (like politicians) on the "Industrial Relations Club" and the "Fridge should be required to declare any pecuniary inter- Dwellers". ests. I was still getting phone calls on this on the day Michelle Grattan greeted my arrival in her before this article hit the presses. office with the news that she was "tired and mudd- During the campaign there were those who led." It was, after all, 11.30 p.m. when I spoke to her directed their criticisms at the proprietors—espe- but Michelle has never allowed a politician or a cially Alan Bond (National 9 Network), Kerry staffer to get away with this excuse when she is Packer (Australian Consolidated Press) and Rupert chasing a late story for the second (or third) edition Murdoch (News Corporation). And there were of The Age. I have known some staffers to auto- those who focused on the role played by journalists matically answer . "Hello Michelle" if the phone in the election—in particular the Canberra Press rings anytime between midnight and dawn. Not Gallery. Former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser only was she tired and muddled, I found that Ms. concentrated his fire on Rupert Murdoch while Ian Grattan had developed a sudden aversion to tape Macphee and Ian Sinclair both went for the Bond- recorders. She initially objected when I turned on Packer-Murdoch trifecta. Mr. Doug Anthony the machine claiming that she never used tapes. To blamed proprietors and journalists alike. But Sena- those who know Michelle, this comment is almost tor Michael Baume (who initiated the controversy) Nixonian. During my period in Parliament House I and Liberal Party Director Tony Eggleton identi- cannot recall anyone with a more insatiable appe- fied the alleged problem as stemming from the tite for tapes and transcripts. Needless to say, I working journalists. So did (then) Shadow Treas- treated Ms. Grattan in the same manner as she urer Jim Carlton who accused the media ofa "bit of treats politicians and recorded the interview. naughtiness." And then there was Paul Kelly. Mr. Kelly also The debate over bias demonstrated that there expressed shock/horror when I produced my tape- is much misunderstanding about the media. recorder. It was like conversing with a politician Messrs. Macphee, Fraser and Sinclair have got it sitting on a less than one per cent majority in a wrong. The key movers and shakers are not the swinging seat. There were requests to go off the proprietors or the editors (although the latter do record (where I obliged by turning off the tape). determine whether to accept or reject copy) but There were also enormously long pauses while Paul rather the working journalists. The leaders of the weighed up the pros and cons of saying this or that. Rat Pack—Laurie Oakes, Michelle Grattan, Paul During one interminable silence my eyes glazed Kelly, Greg Hywood and (from Sydney) Max over. Having just asked a tricky question I Walsh—are among the most influential figures in imagined myself getting up from the table, going to Australia. Increasingly they have more than one the bar to ring a cab and returning just in time for media outlet. For example, Laurie Oakes has a reg- Mr. Kelly to commence (yet another) excessively ular column in The Bulletin. Paul Kelly appears on cautious answer to a rather incautious question. Network 10 as a political commentator. Max Walsh I don t know where Michael Dodd learnt jour- has columns and a TV show. Michelle Grattan and nalism. But from my experience he seems to have Greg Hywood bob up regularly on radio and televi- picked up his question-response technique from sion. In terms of setting the political agenda and Paul Kelly. Mr. Dodd is noted for his ability to fire assessing policies and performance, the Rat Pack fast verbal yorkers at the feet of politicians. But are more significant than an Alan Bond, a Kerry when it comes to batting against my medium-pace Packer, a Rupert Murdoch or (indeed) a James attack he adverted to a stone-walling technique Fairfax. which would have done. Trevor Bailey or Ken There is no doubt that Senator Michael ("Slasher") Mackay proud. Baume s decision to raise media bias as an election My interviews with the Rat Pack took place issue was a valuable political tactic. The Liberal less than two weeks after the election. As such the and National campaigns were (and remained) a discussions were affected by the widespread allega- disaster. At one time it looked as though media bias tions of media bias that surfaced during the cam- was the only issue which the Liberals had. Cer- paign. As a group, journalists are quite insensitive tainly it was one of the few they seemed willing to to criticism but it was obvious that some of the run with (trade union power, waste, etc. having THE RAT PACK
^^ Laurie Oakes
`y The Gallery has "an inflated view of itself
_ Kate Legge Estimates that about 80 per cent of the Gallery vote Labor, Paul Kelly but does not have "strong The Gallery is "very much criticisms of the Gallery or the into practical politics : way it operates".
_
Michelle Grattan "A significant proportion, probably a majority, of the people in the Gallery would think that the Hawke Government has performed as a government pretty well. " - Mike Steketee __ r^. Believes that the Gallery reported fairly the "other side" (i.e. the Thatcher- Howard position) of the South African sanctions issue. THE RAT PACK been virtually ignored). But, tactics aside, the role All maintained that political preference was of the media is an issue that deserves evaluation in irrelevant and that, by and large, professionalism itself. Is there media bias? If so, what form does it rules—OK. Greg Hywood was emphatic that once take? What is the role of the Canberra Press Gallery a journalist entered the Gallery "ideology really in all this? Does it matter? These questions (among gets sucked out very quickly" and that journalists others) were in my mind when I headed off to Can- made essentially pragmatic judgments on parties, berra to meet the Down Under version of journal- policies and politicians based on "their knowledge ism s best and brightest. of the way the system works." Paul Kelly regarded it as natural that members of the Pack were "very Middle Class and Left-Liberal much into practical politics" because most were not economists or specialists in other fields. There From my seven years experience of working in was a widespread view that the Gallery was very Parliament House I have formed a view of the much influenced by .its assessment of political Press Gallery which I was anxious to test on the competence. Michelle Grattan expressed the current members of the Rat Pack. The Gallery is opinion that "a significant proportion (probably a predominantly middle class in background and majority) of the people in the Gallery would think left-liberal in political attitudes. The overwhelm- that the Hawke Government has performed as a ing majority of journalists vote ALP—albeit with a government pretty well." Laurie Oakes conceded certain scepticism towards political parties and that if you hold that the Government "is more politicians born of the latent contempt which Par- competent than the Opposition. . . then that is the liament House familiarity invariably breeds. way you will end up voting, I suppose." The Pack operates according to an informal By and large, the Rat Pack members rejected hierarchical structure with Pack leaders determin- my view that the Gallery was infatuated with Paul ing the political orthodoxies and fashions. Because Keating. I could find no other way to explain why of the similarity in attitudes of Pack members, Keating had received wide acclaim when he was a there is very little diversity within the Gallery. In regulator and potential nationalizer, when (in 1983) other words, heretics are hard to come by. By and he became a deregulator but remained a big spen- large the Gallery acts professionally. After all, a der and when (two years later) he was further con- story, is a story, is a story. But the political orienta- verted to cost cutting. There was, however, a gen- tion of Gallery members is such that if there is any eral agreement that Keating was a skilled politician slippage in professional standards (as there must be who worked harder than any of his contemporaries from time to time) it is the non-Labor side that will on either side of politics in selling his message by invariably suffer. Moreover, conscious bias aside, constantly treading the Gallery corridors. No one the attitudes of journalists must affect the manner disagreed with Laurie Oakes view that Keating in which issues (as distinct from political parties or was regarded as "colourful, tough, outspoken, party leaders) are presented. brave (and) competent." Most of the Rat Pack members to whom I One of the few areas in which there was spoke agreed that the Gallery consisted of predom- genuine disagreement turned on whether there inantly Labor voters. Greg Hywood put the figure were any common Gallery attitudes. I believe that at 70 per cent while Kate Legge went 10 points there was almost a unanimous Gallery position on, higher. Michelle Grattan, Mike Steketee and John for example, the David Combe affair, the MX mis- Stanley conceded that a majority of the Gallery sile issue and the Liberal Party s policy of labour votes Labor. Laurie Oakes had the impression that market deregulation. The Gallery almost to a man this was so in the 1987 Federal election but (and woman) opposed the Hawke Government on expressed some doubts as to whether this was the first two and the Liberal-National Opposition always the case. Paul Kelly declined to comment on the last one. The Combe and MX affairs were on the record (even after a long pause) but did sug- one-off issues. But in my view opposition to John gest that there were "more Liberal supporters in the Howard s approach to industrial relations and sup- Gallery than people think." Michael Dodd was not port for the ALP-ACTU Accord has been a consis- convinced that there was majority support within tent Gallery position. So has support for economic the Rat Pack for the ALP but he could only identify sanctions against South Africa. one Liberal supporter. (Note to Editor—I think I On 31 October 1985 (less than two months wasted some of my allowance on the Michael Dodd after Mr. Howard became Opposition Leader) Greg lunch.) Hywood introduced a report—not a comment
I0 THE RAT PACK
piece—with the assertion that "the deep problems criticism among the Rat Pack of the approach John Howard is having with his policy on South taken by Messrs. Keating, Willis and Hayden to Africa were epitomized at a press conference..." economic policy, industrial relations and foreign (Mr. Hywood is quite fond of this type of introduc- policy respectively. At times this is taken to ridicu- tion.) Hywood wrote that Howard s position was lous lengths—for example when Kerry O Brien (the "away behind the times" and as a result of this "his ABC s chief political correspondent) suggested chances of receiving a sympathetic hearing for his during a radio, interview that there was virtually views from the Australian media" were "minimal." nothing on which you could criticize the economic Howard, Hywood suggested, was "set for a difficult policy of the Hawke Government or when there time on South Africa." And so it turned out to be. was a similar suggestion in a Sydney Morning Her- During our interview Greg Hywood main- ald feature article written by one-time Rat Pack tained that South Africa was different because this member John Edwards. issue was essentially bipartisan. By this he meant that there was a common Bob Hawke-Malcolm The Heretics Fraser position. A similar view concerning the essential difference of the sanctions debate was put I believe that subconsciously at least there is by Grattan and Kelly. Steketee and Dodd main- some. concern about .what Michelle Grattan con- tained that Hywood s October 1985 assessment ceded was a Gallery tendency towards "some sort was wrong—with Steketee holding strongly to the of common view of the world." Invariably when I view that the media had fairly reported "the other raised this sensitive issue, members of the Rat Pack side" (by which he meant the Thatcher-Howard (with the conditioned reflexes of a herd of Pavlov s position). Oakes and Stanley did agree, however, dogs) would invariably bark out the name David that there was some kind of Gallery position on Barnett. During my interviews Paul Kelly, South Africa and that this did influence the way Michelle Grattan, John Stanley, Michael Dodd and this particular issue was reported. Oakes clearly Kate Legge all raised the spectre of Barnett. regarded South Africa as an exception—claiming David Barnett was Prime Minister Fraser s that since the Gallery consisted of "middle class press secretary from 1975 until April Fools Day people with human rights concerns" it was more 1982. He writes a one-page column each week for likely to run a line on an issue like sanctions than The Bulletin and has no regular television or radio on more mainstream political or economic. issues. commentary spots. But, nevertheless, he appears to John Stanley said he sometimes "wondered" be consistently on the minds of Rat Pack members. whether members of the Gallery seek safety in It is as if Barnett is perceived as the resident conser- numbers. In my view this is especially so with vative heretic who can be conveniently trotted out young Gallery reporters—of which there are when allegations are made concerning political many. imbalance in the Gallery. You get the impression If there is (or was) a Gallery position on, say, that if David Barnett were to fall off.the Gallery South Africa then it is quite plausible to suggest perch, a waxworks model would be created over- that there will be other positions across a wide night by Rat Pack members and placed in a promi- range of issues. It is hard to find anyone in the Gal- nent place outside the office of the Leader of the lery these days who is not an economic rationalist Opposition. or who is highly critical of the way the Government There are a few—but not many—Gallery here- is handling the economy. Nor are there many who tics who consistently criticize the Government would now argue against the view that Australia s from the left. .Recidivist Keynesians are hard to industrial relations system needs more flexibility find these days—with the notable exceptions of provided this is achieved within a centralized sys- Ken Davidson (The Age), Paul Malone (Canberra tem. Nor are there many who would oppose a for- Times) and (perhaps) Mungo MacCallum. eign policy approach which allowed the US Navy Melbourne Herald journalist Peter Smark access to Australian ports but which was critical of recently wrote that the "Canberra press gallery certain aspects of the Reagan Administration s pol- these days looks like an interchange bench for poli- icies on, for example, the Strategic Defence Initia- tical press secretaries." The problem is that the tive, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and sup- bench is overloaded with those who are willing to port for the Contras in Nicaragua. pull on a Labor guernsey but very few want to run To put it another way (to use one of Neville around for the Opposition. Sometimes you get the Wran s famous terms), there is not much evident impression that David Barnett comprises the THE RAT PACK backs, the forwards and the interchange bench of "usual press conference semi-yell." What, you one side—all rolled into one—and that arrayed might ask, is the professional justification for this against him is a side that is fielding teams in all put-down and others like it? three grades. The complicated issue of journalistic compe- In the latter years of the Whitlam Labor tence is virtually never tackled by the media. It is Government when the media proprietors were per- much easier to write endlessly of leadership chal- ceived to be supporting the Liberal-National lenges (which inevitably tend to involve Opposi- parties, a number of key journalists (including Rat tions rather than Governments) than to undertake Pack members) signed a petition expressing con- the hard task of analyzing what the latest current cern at the "overwhelming concentration of media account or debt figures really mean. The Sunday ownership in Australia" and dissociating them- Telegraph s Warwick Costin in recent times has selves from what they described as the "inherently emerged as the Malcolm Mackerras of the Liberal conservative bias expressed by the majority of pro- leadership prophets. Costin predicted in February prietors." The signatories included Alan Kohler, 1987 that John Howard had only "weeks if not Mungo MacCallum, Paul Malone, Kerry O Brien, days" left. In June he suggested that Howard might Alan Ramsay, Ken Randall and (wait for it) be rolled even if he won the 1987 election and Richard Farmer. In 1987 when two key media pro- became Prime Minister. prietors—Alan Bond and Kerry Packer—publicly You can learn all about academic Mackerras declared themselves for the Hawke Labor Govern- false election prophesies in the media. But journal- ment there was no similar response. ists seldom criticize one another. During the elec- Mike Steketee believes that a government tion campaign the Sydney Morning Herald dealt always has some advantages when dealing with the with one allegation of media bias by interviewing media primarily because it controls access to such paid-up members of the Rat Pack as Richard stories and information. Certainly this has been so Carleton, Paul Kelly, Mike Steketee and Geoff Kit- since the election of the Hawke Government in ney. Not surprisingly they all felt their election March 1983. Labor handles the media very well. reportage was very much up to (if not above) But, at times, there is an atmosphere of intimida- scratch. It was akin to asking Pope Pius IX in tion in the air. This was evident during the election December 1864 whether he approved of the Sylla- campaign when (in an off-the-record briefing) Mr. bus of Errors: Ms. Legge is a lively journalist with Keating indicated that he had marked certain jour- an enquiring mind. Yet she informed me with a nalists whom he felt had dealt unfairly with him. straight face that she did "not have strong criti- Even Mr. Mick Young felt compelled to suggest cisms of the Gallery or the way it operates." The that perhaps the Treasurer was becoming too Rat Pack is like that. sensitive. During the seven years I worked with the The Liberal and National parties, on the other Coalition in Canberra (1976-79 and 1984-86) I was hand, do not sell their political product to the staggered by the amount of genuine respect, if not media with the same degree of intensity as do their awe, which Liberals and Nationals had for the lead- Labor colleagues. Nor do they consistently fight ers of the Rat Pack. I had been brought up in the back hard when they believe they are the victims of Malcolm Muggeridge "from pulp thou art to pulp unfair reportage. Media bias may become an issue thou shalt return" school. So I was genuinely sur- every three years at election time. But sporadic prised to see many senior Coalition figures race for offensives seldom work. the newspapers or turn on their radios and televi- The 7.30 Report s David de Vos recently sions to await with bated breath for this or that referred to the "ever polite" John Howard. In comment from leading Gallery figures. It was as if September 1986 Ms. Grattan described Mr. they were actors waiting for reviews of a first night Howard as a "soft media target." When I was performance. The problem was compounded by Howard s Chief of Staff I used to (privately) joke the fact that almost every night was first night. that there was Methodism in his madness. The According to Laurie Oakes, the Gallery takes excessive and continual snide personal references itself too seriously. I agree and merely add that the to Howard in the media suggests that nice guys tend Liberals and Nationals take the Gallery too ser- to get treated badly. I recall a prominent Financial iously. Mrs. Thatcher has demonstrated that it is Review report (published on the day before the possible to appeal to the electorate over the heads election) where reference was made to Mr. of the media. It would be worth trying Down Howard s "worried, gold-capped grin" and his Under.
12 THE RAT PACK
There are many able and professional journal- Channel 2 watcher, during his coverage of the ists in the Canberra Press Gallery. But there are not election results on the evening of 11 July Mr. many Liberal or National supporters. I was Walsh twice used the term "we" when referring to reminded of this the other night when I turned on the Labor Party. Maximilian Walsh was not Tim Bowden s ABC Backchat program and noted the first prominent Australian journalist to make that a viewer had written in complaining about this election night slip. I doubt that he will Max Walsh. According to the (somewhat irate) be the last.
Journalists on Media Bias
"...what a lot of people suspect is probably Hawke Government. Most of them think it s a true: that most of the press gallery journalists in good government, that it contains some of the Canberra support the Labor Party... (Partly this best and the brightest, that it believes in econo- would) result from the fact that the gallery is mic rationality and so forth, and they ve let that quite young, unconventional in life-style and, interfere with their professionalism." therefore, liberal in attitudes." Brian Toohey, The 7.30 Report, June 22 Phillip Chubb, Time, July 13 1987 1987 "I do not believe the gallery has set out to "Whilst John Howard remains in conten- get Howard; it has simply given him away." tion, his chances are gradually being whittled Peter Bowers, Sydney Morning Herald, away by a press, led by the flagship of the Fairfax June 23 1987 empire, the Sydney Morning Herald. Not since "... considerable sections of the media Arthur Calwell has a Federal political leader seem now to be acknowledging that the Govern- been given such a rough time by the media." ment has got away with more than it should have R. D. Chalmers, Inside Canberra, June 19 in this campaign, and that even if the Leader of 1987 Opposition is taking a long count, the media still "For the past couple of days, I have forsaken has a professional job to do." the soft luxuries of the campaign and headed David Bowman, The Age, June 24 1987 into the newspaper morgues. . . Over many "There has been a bias against Mr. Howard hours, in two cities, I reviewed all the coverage in his period as leader and, of course, judgments by the main newspapers on sale in Sydney and about this can only be subjective. It was more Melbourne. As a result of these studies, I firmly easily identified in the initial six to nine months. believe that the coverage has, at times, been Unusually, Mr. Howard got no media honey- unfair to the Liberals." moon as leader. The media were a factor in the Robert Haupt, The Age, June 19 1987 initial undermining of his leadership." "...the media. . . probably are ailowing the Paul Kelly, The Australian, June 18 1987 Government to get away with more, more easily, "Of course the media is biased. Even Blind than it allows the Opposition." Freddy and his dog can see it. The real surprise Michelle Grattan, The Age, April 7 1986 would be if it wasn t. After all, at least 80 per cent of the people who work in it would be intending "Paul Keating admitted this week the media ALP voters.. . But it is largely a bias of omis- generally had given the Government a `fair sion, rather than commission." go ." David Clark, Australian Financial Review, Michelle Grattan, The Age, September 19 June 22 1987 1986 "...they re not doing their job properly, "...the most biased election coverage they re not doing it professionally. . I think part against the Liberals that I can recall." of the reason is they personally admire the Brian Toohey, ABC Radio PM Program, Hawke Government, most of them support the June 18 1987
13 Debt: The Real Impliocadoo ns
Des Moore
In the last IPA Review, Nobel Prize winner, Professor James Buchanan, wrote about the moral and econo- mic crisis being threatened by the growth of debt in the USA. This article outlines the results of a major research study on Australian debt conducted by Des Moore, to be published shortly by thie, IPA. To date, it argues, the debate, has concentrated too much on the source of the debt and insufficiently on how the borrowings are being used.
Australians have heard a lot about the growing selves"—overlook the key point that what really foreign debt, have been told by the Government matters is how borrowings have been used. Internal that the . large increase- in recent years mainly debt can be just as much a real burden as external reflects adverse external developments beyond our debt if the borrowings are not used productively. control, and have been warned that this will require Unfortunately, that is just what has happened. adjustments to policies to limit the increase in liv- The increase in total borrowings has not been used ing standards (or, in some versions, to prevent any to finance increased investment but has, rather, increase) and to effect a restructuring of our indus- financed increased consumption. As a result, Aus- tries. What we have not been_ told by the Govern- tralians have incurred a lot more debt but have not ment, however, is that it is of less significance that commensurately increased the productive _assets the debt increase is entirely in foreign debt than needed to service that debt (which explains the that the increased borrowings have been used to increasing proportion of incomes going on debt finance consumption, that debt has grown relative servicing). Moreover, an increasing proportion of to income because failed domestic government investment has been for replacement of"worn out" policies have wrought major structural changes in capital rather than expanded productive capacity the economy and in social attitudes that have been and some of the investment that has been financed inimical to economic growth, and that we are prob- by borrowing has not produced satisfactory ably now falling into a deflationary debt trap which returns. will end in a depression unless major. changes in a Per Cent To GDP wide range of policies are implemented. Con- Gross The essence of the debt problem is this. For the sump- Invest- Gross Debt past 15 years or so, Australians have been increas- tion() ment(b) Total(c► External ing their borrowings at a faster rate than . their Av 1970/71 to 73/74 72.5 18.5 124 12 incomes and, for each of the three major sectors of Av 1974/75 to 77/78 75.6 17.4 110 9 the economy-government, corporate and house- Av 1978/79 to 81/82 77.1 18.0 114 13 hold—the cost of servicing those borrowings has Av 1982/83 to 85/86 79.0 17.4 129 29 been taking an increasing proportion of receipts. 1986/87 (est.) - 77.4 17.0 140 41 These trends have worsened since the early 1980s. (a) Private plus government. Includes consumption of Too much can be made of the fact that the capital. increase in total debt and debt servicing costs is a (b) Excluding investment in dwellings (and real estate trans- fer expenses) and stocks. reflection of increased foreign debt. Those who (c) Excluding all debt of financial institutions, i.e. is under- argue that external debt "matters"_ while internal stated to the extent of borrowings by financial institutions debt does not matter—"because we owe it to our- from overseas.
Des Moore, Senior Fellow at the IPA, was formerly Deputy Secretary to the Commonwealth Treasury. 1. In his book, Public Principles of Public Debt: A Defence and Restatement (1958), Professor Buchanan established that borrowing involves a voluntary exchange in which there is no "burden"incurred at the time of the borrowing. rather the burden of debt is on the future generation. Hence, the importance of haw borrowings are used. He also pointed out that there is no essential difference between borrowing externally and borrowing internally unless (real) domestic and external interest rates differ. Of course, if (nominal) interest rates take inadequate account of exchange rate changes such differences may arise and may exacerbate the burden of external debt.
IPA Review, August-October 1987 14 THE REAL IMPLICATIONS
These developments do not conclusively One reason is that, as the factors that have establish the existence of a debt problem. In my contributed to the accumulation of debt have also judgment, however, debt levels—and more par- contributed to the slowing economic growth, high ticularly debt servicing levels—have reached a levels of debt relative to income are thus seen as a point, relative to income, where they are inhibiting symptom of other failings and are not recognized as spending on consumption, and (more importantly) a contributor per se. Another reason is that any on investment, to such an extent that we are prob- slowing down effects from the build up of debt ine- ably now falling into a deflationary debt trap. The vitably involves a gradual process that cumulates basic notion of such a process is simple. over time and is not susceptible to measurement: in If people and businesses find that, after paying these circumstances there is a natural scepticism interest, they have less income left with which to about assessments that must be based essentially finance other spending (or, if not less, a slowing on judgment rather than statistical "proof . Also, growth in other income), they will naturally tend to the focus of economists (and others) on the short- spend less on goods and services or to take less risks term economic outlook may have contributed to a in expanding productive capacity. This process can tendency, which has only recently started to be be self-reinforcing in the sense that the less people remedied, to have less regard to longer term struc- spend on buying goods and services the less likely tural changes and their implications for the econ- businesses will be to undertake new investment to omy. This has tended to result in an assumption provide those goods and services. Moreover, gov- that adjustments in key short-term economic vari- ernments are susceptible to the same influences. As ables (such as public sector borrowing or the debt levels increase relative to income, there is thus exchange rate) will do the trick. Associated with an in-built, albeit almost imperceptible, tendency this is the tendency to suggest that the major cause for economic growth to slow. of our debt problem is the adverse overseas econo- But the process does not necessarily end there. mic trends; while such an approach does not reject As debt levels become excessive relative to income, the need for domestic policy action it avoids attri- fears of default increase and risk premia demanded buting fault to earlier domestic policy failings—and by lenders also increase. At a certain point, high implies the need for adjustments in policies that are debt levels—and associated major concerns about limited mainly to taking account of the changed default—not only deter investment but start to international economic scene. undermine confidence more generally. Something Of course, Australia has been adversely like this process may have been an important factor affected by slowing overseas economic growth and in the 1930s depression, which was preceded by a increased agricultural protectionism, resulting in a large increase in debt. The stage has now been long-term decline in our terms of trade. But, while reached in Australia where there is a real possibility sudden changes in the overseas scene can provide that excessive debt levels will lead to the debt trap short run "excuses" for inadequate policies, such being sprung and a depression ensuing. excuses are not credible over an extended period: Of course, debt traps can be avoided ifgovern- Australia has to cut its coat according to its cloth ment policies and community attitudes are condu- and is not incapable of doing so. In any event, as cive to an increase in labour productivity and to the graph shows, there was virtually no change in investment. But high debt levels mean that major our terms of trade between the September quarter policy and attitudinal changes need to be made to of 1977 and the December quarter of 1984, by overcome the inhibiting effects of those high which time gross external debt was already well levels. over $50 billion and the exchange rate was already If there is a real possibility of falling into a debt clearly overvalued.3 The main recent adverse trap why isn t there greater recognition of that— movement in our terms of trade has occurred only and why aren t governments taking more steps to since early 1985. We should face the reality that the prevent it? recent downturn in our terms of trade has only
2. See Professor Schedvin s article, "The Australian Economy on the Hinge of History" in Australian Economic Review 1,87 which shows that propert y income payable abroad as a percentage ofexports ofgoods and ser vices is now about the same as it was in 1928— about 25 per cent. It subsequently peaked at over 40 per cent in the early 1930s. J. i.e. the level of external debt in Australian dollars was understated at that time because it would necessarily be increased by subsequent depreciations. Moreover, a substantial part of the subsequent increase in external debt - which may have reached around $110 billion at end June 1987— cannot be attributed to the fall in the terms of trade from early 1985. Also, it is unlikely that policies would have been "tightened" as early as they were in the absence of the fall in the terms of trade from earfv 1985.
15 THE REAL IMPLICATIONS brought forward the need to recognize the deterio- economic policies since the late 1950s and early rating path we were pursuing. 1960s, has been partly financed by debt. Even more There is also a tendency to argue that, as Aus- importantly, however, this expansion of the State tralia s total debt relative to GDP is still consider- has reduced private sector incentives to save and to ably lower than in many OECD countries, we can- work and increased incentives to spend and to go not be said to have a debt problem. However, into debt to do so; private sector "gearing up" has OECD countries economic growth has also been been stimulated by perceptions that the State has slowing and they may be experiencing similar put a "safety net" under the economy, both via "over-borrowing" and the factors contributing to industry support and through the Welfare State. that .4 Alternatively, they may have used their Moreover, the spreading perception that getting increased borrowings to a greater extent than Aus- into debt is acceptable even economically tralia to finance an increase in productive assets; responsible has probably enhanced private sector this is almost certainly true of countries such as debt accumulation, especially in the more recent Japan. Moreover, most OECD countries face fewer environment of financial deregulation. Also, the difficulties in expanding exports. increasing involvement of the State in income redistribution, whether directly through taxation Terms of Trade or "social wage" programs, or indirectly through (1979-80 = 100.0) interference in the wage determination process, and increased "regulation" of business, has made investment less profitable and more risky. 20 The end "product" has thus been an increased emphasis on consumption, financed increasingly by borrowing, and a decreased emphasis on invest- ment, resulting in slowing economic growth and a diminished capacity to service the accumulating debt. What I argue, essentially, is that the growth of government has been responsible for a slowing down in the output (or income) side of the equation but that this bigger government has not taken
Sept 69 Sept 71 Sept 73 Sept 75 Sept 77 Sept 79 Sept 81 Sept 03 Sept 85 Mar 87 action to restrain the spending side commensur- ately. The difference between the output and Comparisons of international debt levels are spending sides of the equation has been made up by not something, therefore, from which we can draw increased borrowings which, after a time, start to comfort any more than we can draw comfort from have their own independent effect in deterring both comparisons that show that the government sector spending and output. in Australia is smaller than in most OECD coun- tries. It avails us little to be running with the many What Should We Do? tortoises that exist amongst those countries! Equally, given the uses to which increased borrow- If we are falling into a debt trap, how do we ings have been put, we cannot draw comfort from avoid it? The short answer is that we have to adopt the fact that total debt levels are not historically policies that will result in increased output while at high relative to GDP. the same time containing spending. There now Finally, to conclude that the policies pursued seems to be general agreement on that. But what is over the past 15 years or so have largely been inap- not agreed is the speed, extent, and even (in some propriate.is not something that finds ready accept- cases) the nature of the changes. In particular, there ance. Yet an examination of developments over the is as yet only limited recognition of the ongoing whole period makes it difficult not to conclude that detrimental effects that the increased size of gov- this debt problem has emerged because of a com- ernment (and particularly the increase in social prehensive failure of government policy which has welfare spending) is almost certainly having on the involved, as a key part, a marked expansion in the incentive to save and to work. The recent report on size of the government sector. This growth of the "Structural Adjustment and Economic Perfor- public sector, fuelled by adherence to "Keynesian" mance" by the OECD a body not known for being
4. There is considerable evidence that the USA has, for one.
16 THE REAL IMPLICATIONS a supporter of small government provided some three percentage points of GDP annually to encouragement to such supporters when it around 33 per cent; included as one conclusion that the growth of pub- • after allowing for a reduction. in the net public lic spending has operated, at the margin, to reduce sector borrowing requirement to two per cent of national income of OECD countries by 10 to 15 GDP (from its present level of around four per cents for every extra $1 raised in taxes. The analysis cent), a broadly commensurate reduction in suggested that it is the interaction of the combined taxation; effects of higher taxation and increased welfare • the establishment of a wage negotiation system expenditure that is relevant. Some academic that allows/encourages a substantial increase in studies suggest that the effects of high taxation productivity. This would best be achieved by a alone are probably even greater.5 Little attention system under which wages and conditions of has been paid in Australia to such studies. employment are negotiated primarily at the Unless we take radical action across a number enterprise Ievel, with full protection for indi- of fields to halt the growth in debt, we face at best a vidual employers and employees from attempts long period of economic stagnation; indeed there is by unions to exercise monopoly power; now a real risk of an economic depression. Those • the improvement of productivity in the public who argue that radical action is "impracticable" sector through the virtual elimination ofcontrols and cannot be "forced" on society do not address preventing businesses from competing in the the point that, unless society is "persuaded" to take markets of goods and services produced by most such a course, the continuation of a "gradualist" public enterprises, and the "privatization" of approach towards change will result in even more most such enterprises; drastic action being required later. There is also far • the reduction of costs through a reduction of too much "fence-sitting" by those who accept the industrial protection against imports at a signifi- need for major change but who are reluctant to cantly faster rate than envisaged by present fully engage the debate because they fear being plans; labelled politically: what we require is leadership • pending an improvement in productivity, poli- from all major non-political groups, including cies which exercise heavy restraint on consump- businessmen, academics and bureaucrats, in the tion spending. To the extent that other policies long run national interest. But, above all, we need do not ensure this, monetary policies will need to the Government to provide the community with a be operated "so as to produce continued high realistic assessment of the difficulties we face and interest rates. to implement the policies to overcome those To state such a program is to indicate just how difficulties. great our difficulties are. The worst is far from over if we are to avoid the debt trap, we should set a and we will need strong leadership from the Gov- three year program along the following lines:- ernment, and from other groups, if our debt prob- • a reduction in government outlays of around lem and its underlying causes are to be overcome.
5. See, for example, Edgar K. Browning. "On the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation" in the American Economic Review, March 1987.
17 Peacemaking-No Child s Play Rita M. Joseph
"Peace at any price" is an unworthy ethic to instill into our children.
In the summer of 1212, an estimated 50,000 chil- us to doubt the truth of that old adage. Indeed, we dren set out from Europe for the Holy Land to should be moved to ask why the more senior mem- make peace between the Christian world and the bers of the Peace Movement, who may have man- Muslim world, to conquer by love instead of mili- aged, before these days of Mickey Mouse options, tary might. There were two groups of children, one to acquire a smattering of history, have deliberately led by a French shepherd boy named Stephen from ignored or conveniently forgotten the lesson of his- Clove-sur-le-Loir, and the other by Nicholas, a ten tory so painfully learned by adult European society year old from Cologne. It was a peace march par nearly eight centuries ago. excellence and it generated tremendous excitement While it should be acknowledged that these and attracted enormous crowds of cheering specta- Peace educators are sincere people, it should be tors. But it was to end in terrible tragedy. Some of pointed out that their sincerity cannot compensate the children became lost, others were shipwrecked, for the deficiency in prudence and wisdom of many and the rest fell into the hands of slave-traders who of their judgments. No doubt they mean well but shipped them to the slave markets of Northern the road to slavery is paved unfortunately like the Africa from where they were sold as slaves to the road to hell. . . Their campaign is designed around East. two distinct thrusts, which are, oddly enough, so With horror we may wonder now how the contradictory as to border on the irrational. parents and those in authority in 1212 could ever On the one hand, like their mediaeval for- have condoned the Children s Crusade. But really bears, they have fostered unrealistic expectations it should not puzzle those of us who watched last of the ability of childpower to achieve peace. They year as our own children were caught up in an have inspired a naive zeal for peace, equipping excess of crusading fervour, whipped up by some of children from kindergarten upwards with an the more fanatical adult members of the Peace armoury of simplistic catchwords and glib slogans Movement, and assisted by the only slightly less with which they are assured of being able to convert unscrupulous persuasiveness of well-publicized the warmongers. television programs like "Mum, How Do You Spell On the other hand, the Peace educators have Gorbatrov?," in which children were presented deliberately dispelled the natural peace of mind glamorously as splendid ambassadors of peace. and heart that has traditionally belonged to chil- It is all too easy to imagine those crusading dren. The natural security and trust that character- children of long ago as they set off in good faith and izes childhood has been blasted to smithereens with high hopes their faces aglow with the zeal with the Peace educators "realistic" horror-inspir- that can be seen on our children s faces each year at ing predictions of imminent nuclear immolation Palm Sunday Marches. for the whole world. That this part of their teaching In moments of optimism, it has been said that program has been superbly successful was demon- we learn by our mistakes. But even the most cur- strated recently in the results of a poll taken among sory glance back over the manipulative antics and Australian schoolchildren, which revealed that the Peace Studies programs devised for children to overwhelming majority was convinced that the mark the International Year of Peace should cause world would end in a nuclear disaster "in their life-
Rita M. Joseph has been a teacher for 17 years, of both Primar y and Secondary students and of a broad array of subjects. including History.
IPA Review, August-October 1987 E 8 PEACEMAKING-NOCHILD S PLAY
time". The children s optimism appears to have destruction). A prelude in which small human been utterly destroyed. Optimism, so natural to beings should be allowed gradually and con- childhood, has been tampered with, replaced by a trolledly to come to grips with the myriad problems defeatism programmed by Peace educators to of the adult world. A prelude in which children swamp any consideration of happier possibilities slowly but surely come to learn both the more such as that encouraging lessons of history—that good can • human ingenuity may yet devise solutions, a dis- triumph over evil even under the most intimidat- covery, perhaps, that will render nuclear ing circumstances —and the more sobering . les- weapons obsolete, or sons—that they must be vigilant against evil, learn- • human resourcefulness and tenacity of purpose ing to recognize it and learning above all not to may yet secure for us the capacity to surmount underestimate it. They must come to learn what and survive a nuclear conflagration. those poor children of 12J2 were never taught— In every age there have been uncertainties, that zeal for peace is useless without prudence, frightening possibilities, looming disasters. The without the wisdom furnished by that most funda- ghastly slow-motion of famine, the swift scourge of mental of all history lessons that teaches the for- raging diseases like smallpox and the Black Death, midable nature of evil and the treachery that ine- the utterly monstrous inhumanity of genocide, and vitably ensues from abject surrender to it. the horrific destruction of wars with massacres, pillaging and burning... Man has always had to live with these things. In the history of civilization, the reversal of But over the thousands of years of history, we this tradition of protecting children is a should.be able to take some comfort and courage remarkably rare aberration; and it will be to from the sure, vivid testimony therein to the our eternal shame if we are prepared to indomitability and astonishing resilience of the condone such an aberration in our own age. human spirit. And of these characteristics, nowhere is there more evidence than in the readi- There is so much to learn, and as I sift through ness of each generation to go to extraordinary, even the recommended textbooks and resource mater- heroic lengths to protect the next generation, trying ials for the various Peace Studies courses offered in to ensure that their children might enjoy, however Australian schools, I am appalled at the narrow- briefly, some measures ofcarefree happiness, that if ness of the perspective being given, at the blinkered they reach adulthood, they might retain some sus- sentimentality of their hopelessly simplistic blue- taining memory of the good and enduring things of prints for achieving peace. life. True, we can t get far along the road to peace • In the history of civilization, the reversal of without the will to forgive. But an essential ingre- this tradition of protecting children is a remarkably dient for forgiveness is universal recognition of the rare aberration; and it will be to our eternal shame wrong that has been perpetrated. And this is where if we are prepared to condone such an aberration in Australian Peace Studies are farcically inadequate. our own age. In truth, it is a cruel and shocking Comprehensive history lessons would be far more perversion to seek to reverse the natural roles, to pertinent. For it is in the sympathetic acknowledge- dump adult burdens of fear, doubt and anxiety on ment by the rest of the world (including Australian children s shoulders. The shallow spiel about how teachers and students) of injuries sustained and it helps children to grow up to be responsible, injustices endured that the reconciliation process, peace-loving, non-aggressive adults needs to he amelioration of the burning anger from the long examined more closely for traces of self-righteous years of bitterness can begin. Peacemakers who try rationalization. to negotiate "no fault" settlements cannot succeed. It is imperative that adult society thinks more For there are few things that rankle more than the carefully about that small precious prelude called swiftness of others to grant blanket pardons to the childhood. A prelude in which small human beings perpetrators of an injustice done to oneself. should be privileged surely to grow confident and Yet in the name of Peace, Australian school- sturdy in a protected environment (not frightened children are being exhorted to forgive the Soviets out of their wits by the certainty, mercilessly and on behalf of the Afghans, to forgive the Vietnamese hysterically thrust upon them in the name of real- for the ordeals of anguish suffered by their boat ism, that panic-stricken adults have lost control of people, and by the people of Laos and Cambodia. a world that is reeling inexorably towards nuclear Such "forgiveness" is ludicrously presumptuous,
19 PEACEMAKING-NO CHILD S PLAY for to be valid, forgiveness, like insurance, requires drilled in the shockingly immoral principle: "Peace that one has a vested interest (the insurable interest at any price". It is this principle that surreptitiously principle). underpins the standard peace education programs. Courses are so structured as to leave students with What About Justice? the overwhelming conviction that the pacifist s hasty resort to surrender is the only rational option Teachers may need to be reminded that, while in the event of a threat of foreign aggression or the peacemakers shall be called the children of tyranny. Students are gulled into adopting the cyni- God, the thirst for justice is blessed too. Children cal belief that all war is crazy, that there is abso- need to learn from history the intrinsic complexity lutely nothing worth fighting for. of intertwined atrocities, anomalies and mistakes Such a reversion of educational philosophy to that have to be negotiated to achieve a just and last- nihilism is scandalous. Essentially, education ing peace. They need to know that all too often in should always constitute a civilizing influence; but the past our peacemakers have been too eager for this new Peace education is, in effect, a reversion to peace—that in their haste to have done, they have barbarism, to the barbaric notion that there is laid the foundations for further conflict and more nothing to discern between good and evil, that war. In short, children should not be given to there is no point in even attempting to champion understand that peacemaking is child s play. It is good above evil, for good and evil are indistingui- not comprised of preposterous activities like shable. (Again and again, the USSR and the USA Samantha Smith-style pilgrimages, anti-American are acclaimed by Peace literature to be morally graffiti writing, the erection of road signs like "Wel- equivalent; and the Westminster system of law and come to Waverly, a Nuclear-Free Zone", and the justice and the Soviet systems are proclaimed to be wearing of T-shirts boasting slogans of such exqui- equally flawed. One wonders whether the Soviet site insight as "Make love not war", and "Every- Jews and Ukranians in the Gulags really would be body, learn to sing together". all that indifferent to a transfer to Newgate or even It would appear that the overwhelming Bogga Road ) emphasis has been placed on fostering an appal- And perhaps the most significant blunder in lingly naive tolerance. But incredibly, the Peace the Peace education initiatives is this fanatical alle- educators have refused to draw the crucial ethical giance to the idea that the threat of nuclear war is so distinction between tolerance of cultural differ- horrendous that it warrants that we be willing to ences and tolerance of evil. Nowhere is it made sacrifice everything, including our principles, to clear to children that to tolerate evil is no virtue avoid it. But how can Peace educators be so sure and that not even that most virtuous of motives, that our fear is greater than any other generation viz, for the sake of peace, can make it so. has ever known, thus justifying as never before the As the French Resistance understood only too abandonment of any concerted effort to resist the well, tolerating evil is tantamount to collaborating aggression of a superior power? with it. Even in the present, there are countless So why then are we permitting the nuclear people who are attesting in the most vivid way to threat to frighten us out of our wits, paralyzing the the truth that one cannot collaborate with an evil hope which up until now has sprung eternal in the regime without oneself incurring some of the blame human breast? Why then are we sabotaging sane, and compromising one s own integrity... Soviet brave, resolute efforts to retain human decency and dissidents in psychiatric hospitals, Lithuanian and avert disaster, with wanton displays of unbridled Vietnamese clergymen in prisons and labour panic and craven cries of"Peace at any Price"? For- camps, and political prisoners and exiles from a get justice, forget human dignity, forget everything score of African and South American countries. that man has ever learned of nobility and goodness, And if ever silence about injustice and decency and fairness, compassion and love—let s acquiescence to aggression is the price of peace, all surrender unconditionally, turn ourselves over then surely we must teach children that it is too to evil, sell our children into slavery, anything, any- high a price. Silence and acquiescence are synony- thing at all, just to be assured of being allowed to go mous with complicity. In effect, Peace Studies are on living... useless if they do not teach that the preservation of That is the Peace Movement s fundamental human integrity is a higher value than the preserva- message to our children, and what a contemptible, tion of human life itself. pathetic and dishonourable message it is. Instead, however, our children are being
20 1r I.
N. 4k I ___ JL •
1 7A.UdAhbVE AND IIOPV1
onald McDonald House is a place of love, a home Raway from home for the parents and families of children undergoing treatment for leukaemia, cancer and other serious illnesses. There are two Ronald McDonald Houses, one in Sydney and the other In Melbourne. They came into being when senior paediatricians recognised that children respond better to treatment when their families are close by. McDonald s was approached and offered assistance. In the words of Sydney House Manager, Virginia Delaney, "The families and children support each other. They share the good times and the bad times. It s a very warm, very loving atmosphere! Love built the Ronald McDonald Houses and love sustains them.
MCD More than a restaurant. DEFENDING AUSTRALIA
Harry Gelber
more than by ones in Sydney and Canberra. Or that The Cost of Ignoring the viability of Australian enterprises can depend on Japanese investment policies in Europe. Or that Foreign Affairs the fate of Australian farmers, depends in part on One of the most disturbing aspects of the the success or failure, of agricultural modernization recent election campaign was the almost total in China and the USSR, or on the outcome of the omission, by both sides, of foreign relations and political/economic dispute between the USA and security issues. It was a highly significant indicator the European Community. Or of the obvious fact of the prevailing public view of the world, which that in a period of expanding Australian overseas harbours at least three kinds of illusion. It thinks investment, the success of that investment can that foreign -affairs are somehow separate from depend, sometimes critically, on the political rela- "real" domestic problems and can be put on the tions between Australia and the country into which back-burner when we concentrate on serious things investments are placed. like social services and taxation. It assumes that For that matter, the entire corpus of proposed security has almost solely to do with defending industry policies and the improvement of Aus- Australia against invasion or other direct attack; tralian competitiveness depends fundamentally on and since that is very unlikely, paying attention to an understanding of external factors. If our focus is security is a waste of time. And it assumes that domestic, as traditionally it has been, industry because we are inoffensive and far away, we would policy will be one in which government action can be wise not to embroil ourselves with the outside largely substitute for the market. If, however, we world except in things like sport and trade, prob- focus on the global economy, no industry policy ably in that order. can make sense unless it becomes market-con- What all this ignores is the fact that foreign and forming instead of market-replacing. Altogether, security considerations, economic and social poli- governments must increasingly compete with one cies at home, trading advantage, political clout and another to make their countries attractive targets the preservation of our values and interests, form for investment. The entire regulatory and taxation one complex whole, where warp and woof are system must therefore be redesigned with an eye on inseparable. The importance of external relations the potential investor in Rio or New York or Lon- in shaping the fate of Australia, including the daily don, who can only be persuaded, not constrained. lives of individual Australians, has increased, is And if he is to be persuaded, that must be a political increasing and cannot be diminished. task as much as a financial one. It is true that a major strand in the electoral There has been even less mention of the way in debates has been the question of Australia s com- which Australian views and news can be affected petitiveness. But even that has been treated almost by almost instant world-wide flows of news and entirely as a yardstick for discussions of domestic opinion, or the way in which turmoil, political or reform. There has been almost no mention of the religious dispute in other continents can have quick fact that our interest rates are determined by views repercussions in our own. and judgments in New York and Zurich rather It may be that illusions about security have
Harry Gelber is Professor of Political Science at the University of Tasmania.
IPA Review, August-October 1987 22 DEFENDING AUSTRALIA been especially damaging. They have not merely led Vietnam, would be highly vulnerable in the event to the assumption that economic and security con- of war. But in the meantime it is of very great value siderations are separate, but to the view that what- as a means of "showing the flag" and exercising ever happens nearby like the Fiji coup or develop- political influence, as well as for intelligence opera- ments in Papua/New Guinea matters to us while tions, not to mention any positioning of forces developments further afield probably do not. prior to the outbreak of a conflict. Still less does Australian opinion seem to have focused on the seeming retreat from reform and More surprising still, given its immediate liberalization in China, on the tensions in that huge relevance to Australian affairs, is the way in society between modernization and Party control, which general Australian opinion either between xenophobia and the desire to learn foreign ignores the implications of the Japanese- techniques or even on the careful balance, in the American dispute on trade, payments and management of China s external relations, between investment, or else regards it as a kind of the West and the Soviet Union. football match in which we are interested but More surprising still, given its immediate rele- essentially unconcerned spectators. vance to Australian affairs, is the way in which gen- eral Australian opinion either ignores the implica- Yet a moment s reflection must show that the tions of the Japanese-American dispute on trade, Fiji affair, however regrettable, is relatively trivial payments and investment, or else regards it as a and in any case not a matter where we could or kind of football match in which we are interested should seek to intervene. Ethnic and racial disputes but essentially unconcerned spectators. Yet the dis- will not disappear from the world merely because pute harbours dangers of major political as well as we say we want them to. Whether Fiji has a regime economic disruption, with potential results of the that we like will, in the end, make very little differ- greatest seriousness for us and for others. That an ence to the security and welfare of Australia. By election campaign of several weeks should go by contrast, events in Europe or the Persian Gulf or without so much as a mention of the economic, let even Central America could have a decisive effect. alone the political, implications of these events is If, for example, unrest and "revolution" in Central surely alarming. To indicate just two of the possible America were to spread to Mexico and little in developments: what if serious political difficulties Mexico s political and social structure gives one were to produce a major Japanese economic down- confidence that it could not the United States turn? Or what if such difficulties were to propel would be placed in a most difficult position. Japan into a more rapid development of various Washington might be forced to divert massive kinds of post-nuclear, even if chiefly defensive, effort and attention to its Southern border, if only strategic weapons? because millions of frightened Mexicans might try We have even ignored the organic relationship to cross it to seek refuge. Such a diversion of effort between security, research and development and could easily make the maintenance of the US posi- industry policy, including the much-discussed tion in Europe and the Pacific impossible. There is business of technological upgrading. One looks in no sign that those Australian groups which vain to the recent Defence White Paper, or to the specialize in airing moral outrage about US policies election campaign, for more than a brief aside in Latin-America have seriously considered what about fhe new strategic arena of space which has would happen to Australia s security and other been opened up by the superpowers and, increas- interests if such a thing happened. ingly, by others also. Yet that area of competition is Nor is there much sign that the wider public likely to be decisive not just for many aspects of has thought about the problems of the Northern intelligence, communications and defence but for Pacific, or the wider implications of the Soviet the development of many of the lead-technologies naval and air build-up in the region. Messrs. of the next era of Western economic development. Hawke and Beazley have no doubt been correct to Can it really be wise for most Australians to look argue that the Soviet base at Cam Ranh Bay, in the other way?
23
Deadlier than War R. J. Rummel
If the peace movement is serious about preventing the slaughter of human lives, it should rethink its central focus---for a greater killer of people than war has been absolutist governments, and the most murderous of these have been communist governments.
While libertarians have recognized the economic responsible for the massacre, executions, starva- and moral virtues ofa free society, they have largely tion, and deaths from forced exposure, slave- ignored or been ignorant of an intrinsic hallmark of labour, beatings, and torture of at least 95,153,600 freedom: that libertarian governments of free people in this century, or 477 people per 10,000 of societies are the most peaceful, the greatest their populations. By contrast, the number of battle respecters of the value of human life. casualties from all wars in this century is In a number of scientific books and articles , I 35,654,000, or 22 per 10,000 people of the popula- showed that libertarian governments do not make tions involved. On a per capita basis, communism war on each other, that they have the least foreign is at least 20 times deadlier than war. Communism and domestic violence, and that the greater the in this century has killed even more people, aside freedom in two nations, the less there has been from communist wars, than the 86 million that per- military violence between them. Indeed, the most ished in all the wars and revolutions since 1740. violent governments have been totalitarian, those Before elaborating on these incredible asser- least free. And this is not only historical fact but is tions, let me present and define the relevant data. what we should expect in the future. Non-violence Table 2 provides the definitions and national data is inherent in freedom. and Table I gives the summaries. In a recent article (Reason, October 1985), By war is meant any international or civil vio- James L. Payne calculated that communist lent conflict (such as a guerrilla war, rebellion, revo- regimes, the dominant totalitarian form today, are lution, or terrorist campaign) involving at least clearly the most militaristic. They have an average 1,000 killed in battle or action. This includes not of thirteen full-time military personnel per 1,000 population, compared to six for non-communist nations. Table 1: Twentieth Century Killed by Cause Cause Total Averages per That non-free, or absolutist, nations are more (thousands) 10.000 population violent and militaristic has been occasionally Government 119,394 349 pointed out by libertarians and others. The major Non-Free 115,423 494 virtue of recent research is to provide the statistical Communist 95,154 477 confirmation and to make more people aware of Other Non-Free 20,270 495 these facts. Partially Free 3,140 48 But what is generally unknown about absolu- Free 831 22 tism, and to my knowledge has not been mentioned War 35,654 22 International 29,683 17 elsewhere, is that absolutist governments kill many Civil 5,970 26 times more people than have been killed in all the The data on wars is from J. David Singer and Melvin international and civil wars put together. Small, Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816- And the worst type of these absolutist govern- 1980 (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982). All figures in the table are ments is communism. It is a killing machine, rounded, therefore totals may be slightly out.
Dr. R. J. Rummel is Professor of Political Science at the University of Hawaii. 1. R. J. Rummnel, Understanding Conflict and War (Vol. 1-5, Beverly Hills, California; Sage Publications, 1975-1981); "Libertarianism and International Violence, "The Journal of Conflict Resolution (Vol. 27, March 1983, pp. 27-71), "Libertar- ianism, Violence within States, and the Polarity Principle, "Comparative Politics (Vol. 16, July 1984, pp. 443-462): "Libertar- ian Propositions on Violence Within and Between Nations: A Test Against Published Research Results," The Journal of Conflict Resolution (Vol. 29, September 1985, pp. 419-455).
IPA Review, August-October 1987 24 DEADLIER THAN WAR Table 2: People Killed by Government in the Twentieth Century
State Years Govt. Pop. Killed Killed per Code NOTES Type2 (mil)l (000) 10,000 Pop I. Occupying or colonial states Afghanistan 1978-79 C,NF 19.9 27 13.6 S responsible for the deaths in a nation are given in parenthesis. Albania 1944-47 C,NF 0.8 150 1,816.0 S 2. C = communist; NF = non-free; Algeria (France) 1945;1955 F 47.0 36 7.7 S The partially free; the esti Allied Democracies 1943-1947 F 218.6 7955 36.4 S 3. The population is the estimated Angola 1976-78 C,NF 7.0 71 101.4 U mid-point figure over the indi- Argentina 1976-81 NF 26.5 15 5.7 A cated years. Brazil 1960- PF 93.0 1 0.1 R 4. Government killed is defined as Bulgaria 1944-45 C,NF 7.1 4 5.6 U any direct or indirect killing by Burundi 1965; NF 3.5 I50 428.6 A government officials, or govern- 1972-73 ment acquiescence in the killing by others, ex, of more than 1, hat Cambodia 1975-79 C,NF 7.5 2,000 2,666.7 A people, except execuUOn for what Chile 1973- NF 9.2 17 18.5 S are conventionally considered China 1949-70 C,NF 670.0 45,000 671.6 A criminal acts (murder, rape, spy- Colombia 1948-57 PF 11.6 67" 57.7 S ing, treason, and the like). This Croatia 1941-44 NF 4.5 836 1,857.8 5 killing is apart from any ongoing military action or campaign, or Cuba 1959- C,NF 7.4 21 28.3 U any conflict event. That is, those Cuba 1952-59 PF 6.0 1 1.7 U killed in a riot by the police are not Czechoslovakia 1945- C,NF 13.3 1309 97.4 U counted; nor are those civilians East Timor(Indoncsia) 1975- NF 0.6 100 1,666.7 S thatdiefromurbanbombingdur- Eastern Europe 1944- C,NF 60.4 2,10010 348.0 M ing a war, or from starvation dur- E. Europe USSR s 1945-50 C,NF 2,1 1 1 S ing a military siege or enemy El Salvador 1931-44; PF 2.6 42 159,7 S embargo. 1979- 5. A = an approximate average of numerous published estimates; Equatorial Guinea 1968-79 NF 0.4 50 1,250.0 S M=a clear minimum estimate; Estonia (USSR) 1940-45; C,NF 1.1 65 570.8 R R = author s rough guess and 1949 probably an underestimate; Ethiopia 1977-78; C,NF 29.4 150 51.0 U S = directly from one source; 1985 U =a most likely underestimate. Germany 1939-45 NF 17,00012 S 6. The estimated Soviet killed of Germany. E. 1945- C,NF 16.0 81 50.6 U Soviet citizens, POWs and Rus- Agn exiles repatriated by the Germany, E. (USSR) 1944 C,NF 16.0 500 312.5 R Allies. Guatemala 1966- PF 5.4 20 37.4 M 7.OfethnicIndians. Hungary 1944- C,NF 9.5 10 10.5 U S.Of the approximate 200,000 Hungary 1941-44 NF 9.5 19013 200.8 A killed by contending political Hungary (USSR) 1944 C,NF 9.0 150 166.7 S partiesand"bandits",one-third is Indonesia 1965 PF 104.9 600 57.2 S attributed to the government Iran 1960-78 PF 28.7 1 0.3 R (party in power). 9. Partially based on an estimated 5 Iran 1979- NF 34.6 21 6.1 U per cent per annum death rate Japan 1937 NF 450.0 4014 0.9 U over ten-years for those in tabour Korea. N. 1948- C,NF 11.1 10 9.0 R camps. Laos 1974- C,NF 3.3 2015 60.6 U 10. Exclusive ofethnic Germans and Latvia (USSR) 1940-45; C,NF 2.0 72 366.5 S ReichcitizensexpelledfromEast- 1949 ern Europe. 11. Includes only those ethnic Ger- Lithuania (USSR) 1940-45; C,NF 2.6 152 590.7 R mans and Reich citizens that were 1949 killed Wor died during their forcm Malaysia 1979-80 PF 13.0 156 11.5 S post-WWII expulsion From Mexico 1914-20 PF 14.9 10 6.7 R largely Eastern Europe. Mozambique 1975- C,NF 9.5 1 1.1 R 12. Includes Europeans and Soviet Nicaragua 1979- C,PF 2.4- 1 4.2 S Jews, Gypsies, Soviet POWs, Nicaragua" 1960-79 PF 2.0 1 5.1 R Poles and Ukrainians. 13. Jews killedbytheHungariangov- Nigeria 1966 PF 49.9 719 1.4 S ernment,independentofGerman Pakistan 1971 PF 117.0 2,000 170,9 A The "Rape. Paraguay uaY 1966-72 PF 2.3 1° 4.3 M 14. The "Rape of Nanking". Poland 1944- C,NF 26.2 1 1 21 4,2 R 15. See note 9. Poland (USSR) 1939-41 C,NF 12.0 285 237.5 S 16. An estimated 20 per cent death Romania 1941-44 NF 15.1 21022 139.1 S toll of those Boat People forced Romania 1944- C,NF 15.6 100 64.0 S back to sea by thegovernment. Romania (USSR) 1944 C,NF 15.0 430 286.7 S 17. Sandinista government. 18. TheSomeTn government. Romania 1940-41 C,NF 2.0 63 312.5 S 19. Of Northern ethnic Ibo.lbo. Bessarabia (USSR) 20. Of Ache Indians. Russia 1900-17 PF 160.0 3 0.2 S 21. Includes Ukrainians killed during Rwandi 1959-63 PF 3.1 20^3 65.4 S resettlement. Spain 1936-39 NF 24.8 12614 50.8 S 22. Jews killed by the Romanian gov- Sudan 1955-66 PF 12.6 150 119.3 S ernment, independent ofGerman Syria 1980-82 NF 8.0 15 18.8 S Ofethauthorities 24. By thnic utsi. (China) 1955-71 C,NF 1.5 325 2,166.7 A 24. By both the Republican and Turkey 1909; NF 19.0 1,50025 789.5 A Nationalist governments. 1914-18 25. Includes mainly Armenians, but USSR 1918-22; C,NF 170.0 39,50026 2,323.5 A also Greeks and Christians. 1930-53 26. Includes the deliberate Ukrainian Ugandan 1971- PF 12.0 200 166.7 A famine of 1933-34. Vietnam 1945-6; C,NF 17.0 51026 300.0 A 27. Includes post-Idi Amin govern- ments. 1956c; 28. Includes 100,000 Boat People. 1974- Yugoslavia 1945- C,NF 16.1 1,105 688.4 S TOTAL AVERAGE 119,394 349.5
25 DEADLIER THAN WAR only all the major wars, but also such "little" wars Fig.1 Twentieth Century Killed as the Druze War (1925-1927) of France, the Communist Governments and War Indonesian War (1945-1946) of the Netherlands, Total 155,048,000 and the First Kashmir War (1947-1949) of newly independent Pakistan and India. Examples of the Communist kind of civil wars whose battle deaths are counted 61.4% here are the Spanish Civil Wars (1936-1939), the Palestinian uprising in Jordan (1970), and the Leftist campaign in Guatemala (1970-1971). Civil War The figures on those killed by war can only be 3.9% estimates, of course. But war deaths have been the yr object of much recent social science and historical research and I believe that even better data col- International War lected in the future will not significantly alter the Non-Communist 156% 19.1% table s totals. Killed per 10,000 Population The statistics for the number killed by govern- Communist Governmentsrn versus War ment are a different story, however. I know of only 450 one, very incomplete, attempt to tabulate the over- 400 all number of people killed by government (Gil 350 Elliot, Twentieth Century Book of the Dead). In the 300 case of some of the most lethal governments, such 250 as those of the USSR, China, Nazi Germany and 200 Turkey, there are also figures based on much 150 scholarly and demographic research. But I am sure 100 that there are many more cases of "minor" mas- 50 sacres, genocide, and the like, that are underesti- 0 Communist Non-Communist Inter I War Civil War mated or for which information is unavailable, and which together would increase significantly the military action. Unless otherwise indicated, figures totals in the table. These overall totals in Table I for for government killed are assumed to be for killings government killed, therefore, are most likely an apart from war. absolute minimum and perhaps an underestimate While any intentional killing that is govern- by twenty per cent or more. This makes the com- ment policy obviously must be included, should parisons to war even more fantastic. those that indirectly die from government policy be Now, government killed is defined here as any counted also? What about those political prisoners direct or indirect killing by government officials, or who perish from exposure and thirst while packed government acquiescence in the killing by others, into freight cars transporting them to slave-labour of more than 1,000 people, except execution for camps, who freeze to death while being forcibly what are conventionally considered criminal acts, marched long distances to labour in the snow in such as murder and rape. This killing is apart from insufficient clothing, or who succumb to disease, any ongoing military action or campaign, or any malnutrition, exposure, or beatings in camps where ongoing national or international conflict. That is, the death rate may be ten to thirty or more per cent those killed in a riot by the police are not counted; per annum? What about those who die in perilous nor are those civilians that die from urban bomb- attempts to escape abroad from being rounded up ing during a war, or from starvation during a mili- for concentration camps, forced resettlement in tary siege or enemy embargo. inhabitable wasteland, collectivization, or simply The Jews that Hitler slaughtered during World fear and terror? War II would be counted, since their merciless and When the policies of the government are so systematic killing was unrelated to any campaign repressive and terroristic that citizens imperil their (and actually conflicted with Hitler s pursuit of lives by trying to flee their country, then I believe war); similarly, the genocidal massacre of Ibo in that government should also bear the responsibil- Northern Nigeria in 1966 was quite apart from the ity for the resulting deaths. Where figures are avail- Nigerian Civil war; and the deliberate Armenian able, they are included in the list of government genocide by the Turkish Government during World killed. Thus, for example, I added into the totals War I had nothing directly or indirectly to do with the conservatively estimated 100,000 Boat People
26 DEADLIER THAN WAR
that have died on the ocean fleeing Vietnam and forced requisitions of food by the Soviets, imposi- Cambodia. tion of a command agricultural economy, and Moreover, as far as government responsibility liquidation campaigns of the Cheka. This famine is concerned, I see little difference between govern- resulted in three to five million dead. My estimate ment executing a dissident and sentencing him to is four million. labour in a gold mine for ten years under condi- The second famine is the worst in history, and tions that reduce his life expectancy to less than until recently, a well kept secret. It was caused in three years, except that the latter death is a relief China by Mao Tse-tung s agriculturally destructive after a kind of prolonged torture. Thus, I have Great Leap Forward in 1958-1959. As many as included estimates of those who have died in the forty million people may have perished; I would slave-labour camps of the Soviet Union and China, estimate twenty-seven million, which is closer to and the "new economic zones" of Vietnam. that of American demographic studies. The The total killed in Table 2 also includes the Chinese government itself now admits over ten Soviet Government s planned and administered million dead. starvation of the Ukraine begun in 1932 as a way of I believe that the Soviet and Chinese govern- breaking peasant opposition to collectivization and ments should be held accountable for the dead in destroying Ukrainian nationalism. As many as ten these famines, no less than should a drunken driver million may have been starved to death or suc- be responsible for those he kills on the road, or an cumbed to famine related diseases; I use the figure hotel owner for those who cannot escape a fire of eight million. Had these people all been shot, the because of blocked exits and lack of alarms. How- Soviet government s moral responsibility could be ever, because including the dead from these two no greater. famines would be so controversial as to distract There are two more famines for which govern- from the other figures, I will exclude them from ment responsibility is more attenuated and contro- further consideration here. versial. The first of these is the Soviet famine of One more aspect of the table needs clarifica- 1921-1922 caused by the disruption of the 1918- tion. That free governments have killed 831,000 1921 civil war in the countryside and especially the people in our century should come as a shock to most readers. This figure involves the French mas- sacres in Algeria before and during the Algerian war (36,000 killed, at a minimum), and those killed by the Soviets after being forcibly repatriated to them by the Allied Democracies during and after World War II. It is an outrageous fact that in line with (and even often surpassing in zeal the letter of) the Yalta Agreement signed by Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, the Allied Democracies, particularly Great Britain and the United States, turned over to Soviet authorities more than 2,250,000 Soviet citizens, prisoners of war, and Russian exiles (who were not Soviet citizens) found in the Allied zones of occupation in Europe. Many of these people held international passports, some even having lived in Europe since fighting the Bolsheviks in the Russian civil war of 1918-1921. Most of these people did not want to be turned over to the Soviets, were terrified of the conse- quences, and refused to co-operate in their repa- triation; often whole families committed suicide to avoid it. British and American officials had to use lies, deceit, and force (and tight secrecy and public deception to avoid public outcry apparently even relevant officials who might have blocked the repa- triation were deceived) to achieve this repatriation.
27 DEADLIER THAN WAR
Incredibly, Soviet agents were allowed behind American policeman dying in the line of duty, or of Allied lines to help hunt down those who tried to a mountaineer being killed while climbing a moun- escape repatriation; numerous escapees were shot tain. Note especially, however, that the worldwide in the process. risk of being killed by one s own government Select high British and American officials because of one s race, ethnic group, politics, etc., is knew that large numbers of those returned were more than three times greater than the risk of war, executed within hours, most of the others being and greater than that for a motor vehicle accident, sent off to slave-labour camps to die slowly. Of or policeman. In fact, you are safer climbing moun- those the Allied Democracies so turned over to tains than you are from government generally. communist mercies, an estimated 795,000 were The high risk of being killed by government is executed, or died in slave-labour camps or in mainly due to the death toll of communism. The transit to them. annual risk (odds) of being killed by the govern- If a government is to be held responsible for ment for those living under communism is about those prisoners who die in freight cars from priva- 1,000 to 1, or up there with the risk of dying from tion, or in camps from exposure, surely those liber- any cancer or from smoking a pack a day. tarian governments whose officials turned helpless Turning now to compare the overall mortality people over to totalitarian rulers with fore- statistics shown in Table 1, it is a sad fact of recent knowledge of their peril, also should be held decades that tens and hundreds of thousands of responsible. people can be killed by governments with hardly an international murmur, while a war killing several Comparative Risks thousand people can cause an immediate world outcry and global reaction. Simply contrast the To give a different perspective on the figures of international focus on the relatively minor Falk- Table 1, the annual risks of a citizen being killed in land Islands War of Britain and Argentina with the war or by government, especially communist gov- wide-scale lack of interest in Burundi s killing or ernments, is compared in Table 3 to some of the acquiescence in such killing of about 100,000 Hutu largest commonplace risks. These political risks are in 1972, of Indonesia slaughtering a likely 600,000 simply extraordinary, indeed fantastic, for both "communists" in 1965, and of Pakistan, in an their size in comparison to common everyday risks initially well-planned massacre, eventually killing and to the general lack of knowledge about them, from one to three million Bengalis in 1971. even among experts. For example, the worldwide Figure i graphically compares the total killed annual risk of dying in war is close to that of an by governments to that for all wars. American (I presume from the source) being in a A most noteworthy and still sensitive example motor vehicle accident (including pedestrians), an of this double standard is the Vietnam War. The
Table 3: Comparison of Political to some of the Largest Commonplace Risks Type Annual Risk x Uncertainty (odds of x to 100,000) Commonplace Cigarette smoking a pack a day 360 Factor of 3 All cancers 280 10% Mountaineering (mountaineers) 60 50% Motor vehicle accident 24 10% Police killed in line of duty 22 20%
Political Killed in any war 18 25% upward only Killed in international war 15 20% upward only Killed in civil, guerrilla, or revolutionary war 3 50% upward only Killed by government genocide, mass murder, etc. (total) 62 20% upward only Killed by communist genocide, politicide, mass murder, etc. 61 ?% upward only For those living under communism 110 ?% upward only
28 DEADLIER THAN WAR international community was outraged at the Stalin to a total over the whole communist period American attempt to militarily prevent North of 83 million. For China under Mao Tse-tung, the Vietnam from taking over South Vietnam and ulti- communist government eliminated, as an average mately Laos and Cambodia. "Stop the killing" was figure between estimates, 45 million Chinese. The the cry, and eventually, the drumbeat of foreign and number killed for just these two nations is about domestic opposition forced an American with- 84,500,000 human beings, or a lethality of 252 per drawal. The overall number killed in the Vietnam cent more than both World Wars together. Yet, War on all sides was about 1,216,000 people. have the world community and intellectuals gen- With the United States subsequently refusing erally shown anything like the same horror, the them even modest military aid, South Vietnam same outrage, the same outpouring of anti-killing was militarily defeated by the North and com- liierature,over these Soviet and Chinese megakill- pletely swallowed; and Cambodia was taken over ings as has been directed at the much less deadly by the communist Khmer Rouge, who then tried to World Wars? recreate a primitive communist agricultural When one considers this killing per 10,000 society. All urban centres were immediately emp- population, the comparison is even starker. Wars tied of people by force; all former government offi- have killed 22 people per 10,000 of the populations cials were executed; all bourgeois were liquidated; involved. The Soviet Government killed 2,323 per any actual or possible opponents or resisters were 10,000; the Chinese Communist Government 672; killed; most of the remaining educated and profes- the Cambodian Khmer Rouge 2,667. sional Cambodians were murdered; and "com- Compared to war, these figures are so large as to mon" folk violating tie numerous rules governing seem absurd. Yet, even if the most conservative, their dawn to dusk forced peasant labour were indisputable figures are used, the difference remains killed. incredible. The minimum and best documented While international attention finally did turn figure on the Soviet Union that I have seen is the 20 to Cambodia and the United Nations was pushed million killed under Stalin given by Robert Con- into taking reluctant official notice, this was as a quest in his The Great Terror (and this he considers a murmur compared to the screams over America s probable underestimate by 50 per cent or more). efforts to prevent, among other consequences, just Even that absolute minimum is greater than the bat- such a bloodbath that would follow communiza- tle deaths of World War 11, more than half of the tion. The best estimate of those killed after the deaths in all international and civil wars in this cen- Vietnam War by the victorious communists in tury; it is an absolute minimum of 1,176 people Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia is 2,270,000 (not killed per 10,000, or 54 times the number killed per counting those who have died in the subsequent 10,000 of the populations involved in war—that is wars of Vietnam with China and Cambodia, and 54 tines the death risk of war. the continuing guerrilla war in Cambodia). This is As can be seen from Table 1 and especially almost twice as many as died in the Vietnam War. from Figure 1, communist governments are overall And this government killing still continues. almost four times more lethal to their citizens than To view this double standard from another non-communist ones, and in per capita terms perspective, consider the horror over the deaths nearly twice as lethal (even considering the huge from mankind s two greatest wars. Nine million populations of the USSR and China). However, as died in battle in World War 1; fifteen million in large as the per capita killed is for communist gov- World War II. Both wars cost together twenty-four ernments, it is nearly the same as for other absolu- million lives. But many more than this number of tist governments. This is due to the massacres and their own citizens have been killed by the Soviet or wide-scale killing in the very small country of East Chinese communist governments alone. From Timor, where since 1975 Indonesia has.eliminated 1918 to 1953, the Soviet Government executed, (aside from the guerrilla war and associated vio- slayed, slaughtered, starved, beat or tortured, to lence) an estimated 100,000 Timorans out ofa pop- death, or otherwise killed, 39,500,000 of its own ulation of 600,000. Omitting this country alone people (not counting the Lithuanians, Latvians, would reduce the average killed by non-commu- Estonians, Pole s, Romanians, Germans etc., the nist, non-free governments to 397 per 10,000, or Soviets exterminated during its military occupa- significantly less than the 447 per 10,000 for com- tion of these countries and absorption of all or part munist countries. of them). This is my best estimate among figures In any case, even including the special case of ranging from a minimum of 20 million killed by the forced repatriation of millions to the Soviet
29 DEADLIER THAN WAR
Union by .the Allied Democracies, we can still see slaves. Mass killings, executions, forced depriva- from the table and from Figure 2 that the more tion; and the like, then become a practical means to freedom in the nation, the fewer people killed by maintain power, eliminate opposition, punish dis- government. Freedom acts to brake the use of a obedience, and pursue political, economic, social, governing elite s power over life and death to pur- and religious policies. Without the restraints of sue their policies and ensure their rule. Why should opposing power foci, regular competitive elections, this be so? For the same reasons that libertarian free speech, and a pluralistic social system, it is nat- governments are least violent and militaristic. ural that human life will be secondary to a regime s Where there are civil and political rights, free desire for self-preservation, power, and the success and secret elections, and a wide franchise, the gov- of its policies. erning elite are dependent upon the electorate for Hitler s Mass murder of millions of Jews is their power and continuance in office. Moreover, widely believed to have been an historical aberra- their power is limited and divided among different tion, a once only, monstrous result of an absolute elites and groups, and they constantly have an offi- ruler s sick racism. If this article achieves anything, cial opposition looking over their shoulder for the I hope that it shows that the Jewish Holocaust, for slip, the mistake, the misuse of power that could be all its horror and the outrage it has deservedly pro- used to wrest authority from them in the next elec- voked, is but a particular example of mass killings tion. Moreover, with such freedoms, the society by governments—and not even among the blood- develops diverse overlapping groups, elites, and iest. Hitler killed from 4.2 to 4.6 million Jews, but power foci, a rich pluralism that cross-pressures he also killed (aside from military action) 425 thou- and thus moderates interests and policies. Govern- sand Gypsies, 2.5 million Poles, 3 million Ukrain- ment is not only responsive to the core interests ofa ians, 1.4 million Belorussians, and 2.5 to 3 million free people, but also reflects the central moderation Soviet prisoners of war. Overall, Hitler was respon- and civility of the plural, cross-pressured society, sible for the mass murder of about 17 million produced by freedom. people. But Stalin killed a minimum of 20 million. But above all, people are not interested in Mao killed perhaps 45 million. And Pol Pot, hav- being sent to slave-labour camps, executed for their ing slaughtered over 25 per cent of the Cambodian beliefs, or tortured and beaten for criticizing the population in four years, might have even doubled government. In its essence, no libertarian govern- the records of these bloody tyrants if he had ruled ment can do other than mirror and respond to this as large a population for as long. core interest of the people in self-preservation and Of course these tyrants are responsible for this avoiding pain. butchery. But what enabled them to do it was their This axiom appeared to be violated in two absolutist and totalitarian power. It would be a aforementioned special cases. One was the French grave error to focus on them alone as the cause of Government carrying out mass killing in the mass killing. We should concentrate instead on the colony of Algeria, where compared to Frenchmen enduring political pattern that breeds such mons- the Algerians were second=class citizens, without ters and encourages and facilitates their bloody the right to vote in French elections. In the other work. Such is the pattern whose variations we call case the Allied Democracies acted during and just totalitarianism and absolutism and dictatorship. after wartime, under strict secrecy, to turn over And such a pattern is at its core the lack of civil foreigners to a communist government. These rights and political freedom. It is non-freedom. foreigners, of course, had no rights as citizens that Absolutism is not only many rimes deadlier would protect them in the democracies. In no case than war, but itself is the major factor causing war have I found a libertarian government carrying out and other forms of violent conflict. It is a major massacres, genocide, and mass executions of its cause of militarism. Indeed, absolutism is man- own citizens: nor have I found a case where such a kind s deadliest scourge of all. government s policies have knowingly and directly In light of all this, the peaceful, non-violent resulted in the large-scale deaths of its people pursuit and fostering of civil liberties and political through privation, torture, beating and the like. rights must be made mankind s highest humanitar- Where the government is totalitarian, as under ian goal. Not simply to give the greatest number the Soviet communism or the current Muslim ayatol- greatest happiness, not simply to obey the moral las of Iran, or absolutist as under Idi Amin of imperative of individual rights, not simply to Uganda or Francisco Macias of Equatorial Guinea, further the efficiency and productivity of a free the ruling elite have the same effective power over society, but also and mainly because freedom pre- their people that slave masters have over their serves peace and life.
30 . Handb- oks.for Good Government Michael James
The Australian Institute for Public Policy in Perth and the Centre of Policy Studies at Monash University in Melbourne have each produced detailed programs on how to reduce the size of and thereby improve the quality of government in Australia.
During the campaign that preceded its re-election competition in the generation of long-term policy on 11 July, the Hawke Government gave very little goals.. indication of how, and how fast, it intended to con- tinue the restructuring of the public sector and the The Proposals Compared reordering of priorities that it began in its Expendi- ture Statement last May. It returned to office bound Both these books put forward detailed, practi- by few clear and precise commitments, the two cal ways of reducing the scale of government inter- main ones being: not to increase the burden oftaxa= vention in Australia. But they differ in some tion over the next three years, and to abolish child important respects ; Mandate to Govern has a brief poverty by the end of the same period by means of introduction, setting out the rationale and the stra= a new, selective welfare program, the Family Assis- tegy of the book, followed by useful chapters on tance Scheme. Since then; however, it has macroeconomic policy and government and announced a radical reorganization of the public administration. Spending and Taxing goes much service, involving a cut in numbers employed by further in this respect.. It begins with several chap- 3,000 and an estimated saving of $96 million. This ters that -summarize the facts. about the -size and promising start to Mr. Hawke s third term suggests growth of Australia s public sector, explain why that the Government may be receptive to the ideas government growth seems to be out of control, and contained in two major and independent policy argue for -ways • of determining which activities handbooks that were published in the first half of should be left to the market and which should be 1987. undertaken, or at least assisted, by government. Mandate to Govern and Spending and Taxing These chapters incorporate some of the latest are both products of the growing disenchantment research findings about the redistributive effects of with big government, a mood reflected not only in the welfare state. The main such finding is that cash Western public opinion but even in some of the transfers are much more effective in targeting wel- reforms recently introduced in the_ communist fare. to the needy and disadvantaged than are in- countries. They are also evidence of the extent to kind services like health and education, which to a which policy studies have ceased to be the exclu- great extent simply .churn government revenue sive concern of governments, but are now pursued back into the pockets of the original taxpayers. The by an increasing number of private bodies, not just authors demonstrate how easy it is for special inter- policy institutes but employer organizations and ests to `capture the processes of politics and to veto trade unions. This is itself an effect of big govern- the discontinuation of spending programs from ment, which, so it is widely believed, now protects which they benefit, even when those programs no so many powerful partisan, bureaucratic and pro- longer serve any public purpose. One very impor- ducer interests that it can only benefit from private tant result of this finding is that, although the free
Dr. 1tIichael James is a Senior Lecturer in Politics at La Trobe Universit - 1. Mandate to Govern: A Handbook for the Next Australian Government, edited by John Nurick, is published by andavallable from the Australian Institute for Public Policy, 25 Mount Street, Perth. Spending and Taxing: Australian Reform Options, edited b y J. Freebairn, M. Porter and C. Walsh, is published by Allen and Unwin in association with the Centre of Policy Studies National Priorities Project.
31 IPA Review, August-October 1987 HANDBOOKS FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT
Mandate to Govern and Spending and Taxing Summary and Comparison of Main Policy Recommendations
Mandate to Govern Spending and Taring Taxation Immediately index tax thresholds and allowances to CPI. Cut business tax revenue by $2.4 billion, and cut top company tax rate to 30%. Establish committee to design a reformed tax system, to be Cut income tax revenue by $5 billion and reform tax system presented within a year to Parliament for acceptance or as follows: rejection as a package. Cut top personal income tax rate to 30%. Protect worst-off by system of rebates, social benefit rate adjustments, and family income supplement. Adopt one of the following options: Option T: tax all income received, but apply income tests providing tax-free thresholds for low and middle income earners only. Option U: allow optional individual or family tax filing, and a $3,500 tax-free threshold for low and middle income earners only. Place a 5% tax surcharge on higher incomes io recapture income tax forgone by threshold. Option V: Replace wholesale sales tax with 10% broadbased VAT, and raise all pensions and benefits by 6% to compensate worst-off for price rises caused by VAT.
Public Spending Promise that public spending will not be higher in real terms Cut public spending by $12.1 billion to eliminate budget after three years than on taking office, except for defence, and deficit and finance tax cuts. Make savings from health, labour that the budget deficit will be eliminated within three years. market, education, and social security programs as below.
Health Increase Medicare levy to cover full public health costs and Abolish Medicare and universal subsidies. lower income tax by same amount. Require minimum health insurance, and subsidise lower Subsidise health insurance for lower income groups and income groups and the chronically ill. non-social security recipients. Transfer subsidies for the poor and the chronically ill to social security budget and deliver via health card or circumstance-tested voucher system. Privatize Medibank Private and allow a competitive private Allow a competitive private insurance market. insurance market. Fund public hospitals by fee-for-service system for public as Fund public hospitals by direct charges and eventually well as private patients. privatize them. Net savings: $7 billion.
The Labour Market End compulsory membership of trade unions. Increase labour market flexibility to help young gain job experience and work skills. End compulsory arbitration and facilitate legally binding labour contracts. Adjudicate labour contracts in ordinary courts. Guarantee free choice of superannuation funds. Abolish Community Employment Program and replace with Abolish a]I labour market programs and replace with training modest work-for-dole scheme. and education loans or vouchers for young people. Net savings:$500 million. Education Replace recurrent funding of non-government schools with Introduce universal voucher system, each voucher worth 85% regulated voucher system, with higher value vouchers for ofcurrent expenditure per pupil. disadvantaged children. Cut funding of government schools by 15%.
32 HANDBOOKS FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT
Mandate to Govern Spending and Taxing Introduce a universal system of literacy and numeracy testing Retain and increase external assessment in schools. in schools. Consider merit pay for teachers. Transfer responsibility for tertiary education to the States Abolish Schools Commission and Tertiary Education (except in the ACT). Commission.. Require ANU to charge fees at rate of 12.5% of average cost of Make universities and colleges raise 50% of current grants by the course undertaken. self-generated income (e.g. fees). Introduce Commonwealth scholarships and loan guarantees. Facilitate student loan transactions. Net savings: $2.5 billion.
Social Security Raise minimum age for dole to 17. Raise minimum age for dole to 18. Allow dole for new claimants only ifgainfully employed for at Reduce dole by 25% after 6 months (but allow supplementary least 6 months of preceding year. benefit for worst-off, tested for family income and assets). Means test family allowance. Means test family allowance. Maintain supporting parents benefit but enforce maintenance Cut supporting parents benefit by 25%. awards through private debt-collection agencies. Remove tax liability from pensioners and beneficiaries and End tax concessions for superannuation. introduce revised means test. Retain Family Income Supplement and increase with savings from housing expenditures. Net savings: $2. I billion.
Main additional Policy Recommendations in Mandate to Govern
Foreign Affairs and Defence . Privatize airports, Qantas, Australian Airlines and Australian National Line. Increase defence spending by at least the 3°/° assumed in the Dibb Report. Communications Privatize the naval dockyards and the government defence Place Australia Post, Telecom, OTC and AUSSAT on wholly factories. commercial footings. Housing Require cost-based pricing for all services and oppose cross-subsidies. Abolish first home-owners scheme. Rapidly increase the number of TV channels in the cities: End Commonwealth-States Housing Agreement and increase rent allowances and Family Income Supplement payments to Reduce funding for the ABC and encourage it to close Radio achieve equity between low-income tenants in privately and National. publicly-owned dwellings. Hand SBS over to the ethnic communities. Trade and Industry Primary Industry Phase out all protection in 10 equal steps over 5 years, with Deregulate and privatize Commonwealth meat inspection. modest adjustment assistance measures. Deregulate the price and delivery requirements of wheat. Abolish cost-ineffective non-tariff import barriers. Discontinue the super and nitrogen fertilizer bounties. Abolish controls on mineral exports. Discontinue drought subsidies and underwrite private rainfall Abolish the Foreign Investment Review Board. insurance policies. Strengthen and extend the Trade Practices Act. The Environment Halve expenditure on CSIRO. Increase conservation areas substantially. Transport Allow mineral exploration according to a standard strict code Regulate only the prices and supplies of monopoly producers. in conservation areas. Terminate the two-airline agreement. Allow oil exploration on the Barrier Reef but require explorers to be adequately insured against clean-up costs after a spill. Deregulate air fares, routes, capacity, and imports and exports of aircral. Where resistance from conservationists is politically impossible to override, consider vesting land rights in Allow freedom of entry into Australian coastal shipping. conservationist organizations.
33 HANDBOOKS FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT market can fail in various ways.to bring about the reject as a whole. It sees this as the only way of best social outcomes, it doesn t follow that govern- avoiding a repeat of the fiasco of the 1985 Tax ment intervention will automatically remedy those Summit. deficiencies. Rational decisions about where gov- Otherwise, Mandate to Govern offers by far the ernment should intervene need to be based on care- wider range of policy prescriptions. It looks not ful comparisons between the performance of the- only at the high-spending programs but also at the market and that of the state. many `off-budget interventions in.areas like trans- These chapters are very well written and are port and the environment, but above all. in the worth reading in their own right as well as in prepa- labour and the import markets. Sometimes its ration for the detailed policy proposals that follow determination to comment on every type of inter- them. vention exceeds its inspiration: for instance; in a Mandate to Govern and Spending and Taxing section on regional and country television, it differ also in the range of policy areas they address. solemnly declares that `The government should ask As the accompanying table summarizing and com- country viewers what they want (p. 175). But the paring their main recommendations makes clear, book is an education in the sheer scale and com- Spending and Taxing confines itself to taxation and plexity of government intervention in Australia. budgetary reform, especially in the high-spending Opponents of cuts in government intervention areas of health, education and welfare. Its aim is to often claim that Australia s public sector is not reduce public spending by $12.1 billion (about 10 especially big by Western standards. That may be per cent of the 1986-87 total), while targeting wel- true of budget outlays, but not of interventions like fare more efficiently towards the genuinely disad- public ownership and regulations , which permeate vantaged. This would bring the public sector s the economy and go far towards explaining its share of Gross Domestic Product down from 44.3 present stagnation and rigidity. per cent to less than 40 per cent, which is where it was in 1981-82. Cuts ofthis magnitude would elim- The Strategies Compared inate the budget deficit (about $4 billion) and finance income tax and business tax cuts of about The books differ in scope and emphasis $7.4 billion, with a substantial margin to allow for because they are pursuing different strategies of differences in judgments about precise costings. reform. They agree that the problem is one ofcreat- The main aim of the tax cuts is to provide the ing a constituency for reform that is strong enough opportunity for radical income tax reform, which is politically to overcome the formidable coalition of really the centrepiece of the study. The authors vested interests that defend the status quo and col- offer three income tax reform options, each of lectively veto attempts to substantially cut back the which reduces the top rate to 30 per cent and, by public sector. Mandate to Govern adopts an essen- being integrated with social security adjustments, tially indirect approach as a way of economizing on protects the position of low-income groups. The scarce supplies of political will and capacity. It con- authors are confident that the incentive and effi- centrates on deregulation and privatization, since ciency gains from the reforms would be substantial, in these areas at least, politicians may have a and generate about $2 billion of extra revenue. chance to isolate the special interests that oppose However, they have not taken this sum into them, and to override them with the full political account in calculating the cost of the reforms, treat- and intellectual weight of public opinion behind ing it instead as a bonus that could in principle be them. The economic growth that should follow used to finance additional tax cuts. such measures will then greatly ease the task of • In contrast, Mandate to Govern avoids reforming taxation, which in the meantime will detailed costings of its proposals. It calls on the probably have to be tackled by the . minimal- next government to promise not to increase public change approach introduced by the Fraser govern- spending in real terms. The implication is that ments and continued by the Hawke governments. revenue increases should go primarily towards Spending and Taxing, meanwhile, aims to cut closing the budget deficit, which it wants done in directly through the tangle of interests bound up in three years. It also avoids offering detailed tax the major public spending programs. The authors reform proposals, and confines its recommenda- reject the minimal-change approach to tax and tion here to a government commission charged spending reform because it brings plenty of across- with elaborating a non-negotiable package of the-board pain but very little in the way of com- reforms that Parliament would have to accept or pensating pleasure, and so is unlikely to have any
(continued on page 55) 34 Review s 40th Birthday
The first number of IPA Review-appeared in March 1947. This year is therefore its 40th anniversary.
Throughout the years Review can claim to have still flirting with versions of central economic played a major part in influencing official and pub- planning and pump-priming development, Kemp lic opinion on the leading economic controversies was a leading voice on the realities (and con- of the time. straints) of the free enterprise system. IPA Review Since its inception Review has been concerned through these years provided commentary on to elucidate the. economics of the market economy national policy which still reads with a freshness and to demonstrate the superiority of free competi- and relevance. Inflation, for example, was a central tive enterprise over government-dominated concern. Hardly a year has passed without several economic. systems. articles analyzing its causes and stressing its threat There is much still to be done to advance this to a stable social and economic order. Ref Kemp goal. Nevertheless there has been growing recogni- was assisted by Maurice Williams (now a member tion in recent years on both sides of politics of the of the Victorian State Parliament) and in- later essential` validity , of the case for a free market. years by Jacob Abrahami. Review has played a considerable part in bringing Until recent years all Review material was sub- about this-change of attitude. ject to the critical scrutiny of an editorial commit- In the last two years, two senior Labor politi- tee before publication. Since Review never pulled cians-- Treasurer, Paul Keating, and NSW Minister for Planning and the Environment, Bob Carr— have voiced in the pages of Review their disillu- sionment with doctrinaire socialism. In the mid 1980s under the editorship of Rod Kemp, the range of issues which Review covered greatly expanded. While continuing its long-stand- ing concern with economics and industrial rela- tions (the first Review was composed entirely , of articles on this latter subject) Review took to exam- ining cultural issues—such as education, the radi- calization of the churches and media bias—and foreign policy. This is one of three major changes to the Review since its foundation. The other two have been the complete revamping of the journal s size and layout. in 1985 •(with modifications since) accompanied by its introduction to the news- stands (encouraged by the former President, Sir James Balderstone), and the - opening of Review s pages to experts. from academia, business, the media, the professions and other sections of the community. . . Until 1982 the great part of Review was writ- ten by the founding Director, Charles (Ref) Kemp. An exhibition-winning student of Professors Giblin and Copland at Melbourne University, Kemp played a unique role during the post-war IPA s founding Director, Charles Kemp, addressing an period. At a time when academic economists were audience at the University of Melbourne in 1954.
35 IPA Review, August-October 1987 REVIEW S 40th BIRTHDAY its punches, discussion on the committee was often rate. Sir Walter Massy-Greene, chairman of some marked by some strong exchanges. The first Chair- of Australia s greatest companies, whose interests man of the Committee was Geoffrey Grimwade, lay in the export field, was horrified and threatened blunt, intelligent and altogether an admirable char- to resign from the IPA if publication went ahead. acter. One article was so strongly critical of an arbi- But Grimwade was adamant that the commit- tration court decision that it was felt it ran the risk tee should not retract. He asked the Director to of "contempt of court". Grimwade bluntly smooth things over with Sir Walter. It took Kemp observed that in the event of proceedings against some lengthy letters and interviews to accomplish the IPA a member of the full-time staff and not the this difficult and unenviable task. chairman would have to stand trial. Ref Kemp retired from full-time employment On his regular visits to Canberra during the with the IPA in 1976 although he continued to con- fifties and sixties Ref Kemp usually visited the tribute regularly to Review. Roger Neave and later incumbent Secretary to the Treasury. Once, when Gerry Hampel (for one year) also assisted with the with Sir Richard Randall they were interrupted by editorial and production of Review up to 1982, when the number two man, the legendary Maurie Rod Kemp took over directorship of the IPA. O Donnell, who kindly stated that the only worth- John Stone was appointed a Senior Fellow of while critiques of government budgets were those the IPA from 1984 to 1987. In opening the IPA published in Review. branch in Canberra in April 1987, he recalled that On another occasion, Ref Kemp in a visit to the April-June 1969 Review contained his first pub- Canberra was granted an interview with the Prime lished article, entitled, "Inflation and the Interna- Minister, Sir Robert Menzies. Since Review, in a tional Monetary System." number of recent articles, had been strongly critical Dr. Ken Baker, now . Editor, has guided the of Government economic policies he approached it journal into new topics and formats. His analysis of with some trepidation. The interview, however, the National Bicentennial Program in the Summer proceeded in a friendly fashion. But when Kemp 1984-85 Review is acknowledged in the 1987 Ency- was on the point of leaving and had reached the clopaedia Britannica Yearbook as having spear- door of the PM s office, Sir Robert called out "By headed the criticisms of the Australian Bicenten- the way, what about saying something nice about nial Authority s plans. the Government now and then in that publication How successful Review has been must depend of yours?" on the judgment of others. But over the years it has Review of course could not please everyone all won accolades from prominent Australians, the time, even those amongst its most prominent including Sir Robert Menzies, who early on said of supporters. During the "Korean" inflation of the Review: "On the documentary side of political early 1950s it decided to advocate, among other economy no better work has been done during my things, a 10 per cent appreciation of the exchange 21 years of Parliamentary life."
36 Ideas Which Count
Ideas can and enco Ort freedom The dom policy in have pros economi taxes anc power. TI enormor taxpayer. The think-tan costs anc It promo reductioi governm educatio Ast the enha freedom
Subscrit
Plea Sub;
Name... Address . .
Payment q i encloa of Pub! q Bankea Card No. Expiry Da Mail to: TI In 81 M
1976
•; The Bahamas ° cuw - V rxe.n R.Au^IK
Jamnca^