Tritium Through
Enriched Management
October
Report
ENERGY
U.S.
to
2015
DEPARTMENT
Congress
And
2060
United
OF
Uranium
States
Plan
Washington,
Department
DC
of
Energy
20585 Please This inventories • Message
•
•
• •
•
•
Assistant •
If
other
1
I
n
you
The
The
The Chairman,
The
The Ranking response Senate Chairman,
Ranking The The Senate
Chairman, The
Ranking Chairman,
House
Ranking House
report
Congressiona
have
find
Honorable
Honorable
Honorable
Honorable
Honorable
Honorable
Honorable Honorable
Secretary
Committee
Committee
the
Comm
Committee is
through
to
any
Member,
Member,
Member
Member
being
Titl
Senate
Subcommittee House
Subcommittee
Department
questions
e from
l language l
it
Ill
Thad
tee
Barbara
Nita Harold
Lamar
Dianne
,
provided Mike Marcy
for
2060.
Divi
,
,
Committee
Committee
Senate
House
Subcommittee
S
on
on
on
on
Congres
ub
s
M.
Cochran
Simpson
l
1 Appropriations Appropriations
committee
isted Appropriation
Appropriations
or
Alexander
Kaptur
the Rogers
Feinstein
Lowey
D,
of
Mikulski
to
Committee
need
Committee
on Section
on
Energy's
In
s
the
ional
App
Energy
on
Energy
on
Secretary
additional
following
e
Appropriations
3
Appropriation
ndi
on
on
1
a
1
nd
plan
x
of
s
and
and
Energy on
Energy
B
on
the
Intergovernmental
Appropriations
Appropriations for
Water
Water
information,
Consolidated Members
manag
and
and
s
Development
Development
Sincerely
Water
Water
eme
of
Appropriations
Congress:
plea
nt
Development
Development
,
Affair
oftritium
se
contact
s,
at
Act,
and
(202)
me
2014
enriched
or
586-5450.
(Pub.
Mr
.
l.
Brad
113
-
76
Crowell,
)
,
and The
Executive demand responsible d Uranium plans DOE's restrictions, Defense-Related
Non-Defense
in ceased Most
a
future. in defense and repurposing
technologies, nuclear obligations restriction U conver
defense peaceful
e
nd
.S.
mand
sec
1992
•
• • •
•
•
•
/or
Department
options
nuclear
and
of
ure
defense
Highly s HEU HEU low
applications HEU systems, HEU
Higher-assay medical
. costly enriching
ion,
materials
these
through
along
needs
purposes.
(EU)
The
use
storage,
options
s.
-
for
derived
for
to enriched in for
production
enr
for
nonproliferation
or
T
stockpile
encumbrances
to
to
National
enriched
production
requirements support
h
with
fuel and
a
by
down
naval
future
ese isotope i
managing
chment, meet
and
of recover
number
2060
Missions
uranium
for
the
require
unusable
Summary
non-defense
research
Energy's
associated
restrictions
from
(e.g.,
LEU
other
-
propulsion managing ur
blending
President
Tritium
our
National
and
of
includes
Priorities
uranium
a
production
capabilities,
.
nium
(greater fuel
foreign-origin
of
prior
Mutual
equipment,
that To
the for defense
offer
re
national
HEU
National
reactors
derived
are
meet
se
fabrication,
policy
use
and diminishing
(LEU)
any cost
to
HEU
arch
Aeronautics
come
tritium
HEU s
in
related {HEU)
supp
programs
in
Defense
analyses
co than
in
1994
the Enriched
and
nuclear
spent
and estimates
from n
purposes and to
nuclear and
in
from
missions
version
for
Nuclear l
from
ied
a
diverse to
5%
support
weapons
nd non
and
uranium,
research
mission
and
U
production
medical
maintain
dismantled nuclear
from
and
.S Agreements
U infrastructure
HEU and of
weapon
(powering
two
-
EU
defense
.
.
and
Uranium
weapons
S.
2005
demand to
international
.
Security
commercial
that
needs
Government
les
the
resources
s
production
sources:
LEU
tockpile
EU
Space
and
app
isotope
processing
fuel .
s
require the
s United
than
This
demands
technologies
fuel)
related
material
li
components,
li
weapons
aircraft Management
cations
and
(SNF), in
s Administration
nuclear
Administration
ted
report
20%
1964
to that
Department
(1)
to
production
States' supply
power
a
agreements
of above,
continue
satisfy
policy missions
foreign
reliable
or
equipment,
235
are:
be carriers are
tritium
and
that outline
weapons
other
U)
produced
free scena
reactors
needed
HEU
.
stopped
the to
working
U.S.
were
These
Plan
imposed
supply
.
to
and
fuel
forms
and
s
of of (DOE/NNSA)
Thi Department
stockpile (NASA)
rios for
the
national
meet
stockpile
Energy peaceful
or
Through
other
declared
s
to research
s
being
restrictions
,
peaceful
using
ubmarines)
all report
technologies inventory Department'
of
that
material
meet
those peaceful
HEU
program
Enriched
research
.
security
emp
are
I
re
The
use
October
s
future 2060
excess
s
production
reactors
i
ummari
i
s
ources
need
s
u
difficult
loy
,
use
ses
U.S
material affect
use
s,
ed
I
, s
s
of power .
and
to
Page
plans
in
,
2015
for
zes
for
the all
(2)
iii The
timeline
that
two produ entirely
2038 and However, principle, schedule, U.S. To produce reliable This Previou of
note Other inventories may
with DOE/NNSA's national used
Naval Ensuring
-
magnitude
meet
operated
most
TVA
nuclear
, report could
- be
significant
to
2041.
new cing
defense
Reactor
s
exhausted
source
of produce
ly
further.
tritium.
priority
mission
r
a
eactors pressing each
and
,
DOE/NNSA
burnable
extend so
LEU
long-term
unobligated
also
currently
This
nonproliferation
urce
Office
by
s
cost
risks
,
and
that
LEU
of
input
presents
Nuclear
the
missions
unobligated report
requirement
s
The
to It
tritium
the
d
of
in estimates
non
are fuel
reaff
of
i
e
absorber
s
produce
Tennessee
fen
approximate
fuel
used
continuous
from
has
method
both
unobligated
Tritium
Nuclear
-
detailed
core
also
defen LEU
i
se
Energy,
rm
an
while
evaluated
will for
to
free
the
mission
s
fuel assessment
outlines
loaded
that
tritium
are
naval
policy meet
EU
rods s se
s
require
and
Material
Offices
of in
minimizing
from
in Valley
mission
and for
were
also
supp
the
the
obtaining
ly
this
(TPBARs)
Enriched LEU
reactors
need
non-defen
restrictions
tritium
into multiple
10
based
Environmental
additional
foreign
future
provided
DOE/NNSA
a
l
evaluated of
report. Authority
y
fuel
to
dedicated
Integration
of of
requirements TVA
is
Defense
15
consumption
unobligated method for
on
need
production
,
additional
will
Uranium in
peaceful-use
six
years. options
reactor
se
tritium
recent
a
.
.
option
be
uranium
single
national
(TVA)
date against
agreement
Programs
effort
s
needed
coordinated
Management.
and
s
and
,
analyses.
Management
for
for
.
s
which unobligat
commercial
are
was
EU
that
The
that
of
technologies
a
Department
enrichment
priority
tritium
identified tritium
obligations
standard
also
for
unobligated
in
,
projected
Department
could
Defense
with
s
is
approximately
pan
defense
produced
addressed
In
ed
th
production
production
missions,
s TVA
keeping
e
potentially
light
LEU
multiple
three
set
Plan
development
technologies
Nuclear
to
and
other of
provides
and
of
and
EU.
water
be
Energy
Through
expects
by
short
criteria
in
unencumbered
with
as
non
expended
the
than
programs
irradiating
this
from
2060 must
current
Nonprolifer extend
reactor
-
-
the
term
the
associated
defense
I
report
to
.
using
October
2060 of
2027
and
consist
that
Rough
above
most
need
this
actions
ly
that
.
by
owned
HEU
tritium TVA .
defined,
could
to
I
Of
plan
2027
at Page
to
order
by
2015 cost,
ion,
to
use
be
.
iv Table
III. I. Production II.
IV.
Introduction Legislative National
Demand
Options Tritium Option Unobligated Tritium Advanced Alternate Option Option Existing Option Particle Option
Nuclear
Naval
of
MANAGEMENT
......
TRITIUM
Nuclear
Contents
3. 4. 2. 1.
5.
for
Demand Production
Accelerators
Supply
Security
Weapons for
HEU Down Preserve HEU Repurposed
Tritium
Reactor
Language
.
......
Obtaining
HEU
......
Tritium LEU
from from
Propulsion
of
-
......
Blending
Fuel and ......
Demand
Supply
Unobligated Stockpile
Technologi
Existing
and ......
Defense DOE-Owned
AND
...
.
High
......
Unob
Requirements
....
Excess
.
......
Enriched
......
and
National
. Reactor
for
......
Assay
l
.....
Unobligated
......
igated
......
PLAN
ENRICHED
Programs
.
......
Uranium
es
Production
.
..... Tritium
......
.
...... LEU
Uranium
..
......
..
......
.....
Irradiated ......
......
LEU
..
...
Fue/.. LEU
.
..
Security for
. .
......
......
..
......
for
.
....
......
THROUGH
......
....
and
.
Management Strategic
Tritium
for
......
Tritium ......
.
......
LEU
......
..
Department
Technologies
..
.
......
......
.....
..
Tritium Unobligated
..
......
Nuclear and
......
......
Inventories
..
URANIUM
......
..
..
Production
......
......
Production
Excess
Reserve
.
......
......
......
Plan
.....
Production
...
of
Fuel..
...
......
......
Energy ......
.....
2060
Through .
HEU
...
LEU
......
..
......
......
.
. ..
...
.. ..
......
......
..
......
.
......
....
......
......
....
......
for
I ......
......
.
.
. October
...
.....
......
.....
......
2060
.
......
...
..
Tritium
......
...
...
..
..
......
...
..
..
.
..
......
......
..
......
......
I
......
......
Page
....
..
2015
...
..
..
255
266 266
.
...
11 ..
14 18 14 16 19 12 15 22 22
23
4 8 2 8
9
v V.
Appendix Appendix Appendix VI. Appendix
Uranium
Conclusion
Space
HEU AC1 Mutual Electromagnetic Defense Atomic Small High-Assay Existing Separation Unencumbered Paducah Observations Other Cost Other
00
A:
C:
B:
D:
for
Estimate
Centrifuges
Reactor Sources
Infrastructur
Centrifuges
HEU Congressional
References Defense Tritium
Vapor
Reactor
Isotope
Supply
Enrichment
Gaseous
......
oflsotopes LEU
Tritium
Supply
.
......
for
Laser
of Fue/
Enrichment
Agreem of
Supply
Production
Research
Fue/
Isotop LEU
......
a
Diffusion
High-Assay
......
.
...... and
.....
e New
and
Isotope
...
......
Needs
Technologies
and
...
.
.
..
...
Language
by
Enriched
.
e
.
e
...... and
..
..
AC1
Demand nt.
Separation
.
....
......
Laser Excitation
Reactor
NU
.....
......
.
Plant
and ...
Facility
Separation
...... Demand ...
00
......
......
.
......
..
LEU
..
.
Uranium ....
. ....
..
Facility ......
.....
.
..
Research
......
......
......
......
..
.. ..
......
(PGDP)
......
......
. Fuel
....
......
...
......
......
...
.
....
......
..
(EMIS) ..
..
..
..
.
...
..
......
. ....
....
......
.
......
Management
......
. .
......
......
..
(AVL/S)
.....
..
......
......
......
...
......
..
Department
Reactor
....
......
(SILEX) .
.
..
......
......
..
..
..
....
......
......
...
..
......
...
.
...
.....
......
.
......
....
......
..
..
.
..
. .
......
......
.
.
......
......
......
......
...
.
Fue/
......
......
.
Plan
.
..
......
....
..
...
.
..
......
..
.. of
.
......
.....
......
....
......
.
.... .
..
......
......
....
..
... .
Energy
Through
.
......
......
......
......
... ..
..
. ....
...
..
......
..
......
......
......
..
......
...
.
......
..
..
......
......
..
.
......
......
..
......
.
......
......
......
......
......
...
......
......
..
I
.
..
......
October
..
2060
......
... ..
......
.. ..
......
....
.
......
..
......
.....
......
.
..
......
......
.. ..
......
.... .
......
......
......
..
......
I
.....
......
....
...
.
...
Page
....
.
2015
288 277 288 300 288 311 333 311 322 344 344 422 355 400 366 366 444 388 4
29
33
35
48 77
vi List Figure Figure F
Table Figure Figure Table Table Table Table List Table Table Table Table Table Table Table
igure
of
of
4. 3. 1.
8. 6 2. 5. 9. 7
10. 11. 12.
1.
2. 4. 3. Figures 5 Tables
. .
.
propulsion
1964
Cost Baseline Production Cost Option Summary
Evaluation Naval HEU HEU
AClOO
History
Current Commercial Combined DOE
Accelerated AC100 Tritium
Profile Profile
Space Down-Blending
and
Excess
Reactors
1:
Facility
of
Tritium Facility
Sources
NNSA
Production Preserve
1992
of
U.S.
of
applications Reactor Effect
Reactors
for for
Enriched
HEU
Production
Advanced
and
......
and Tritium HEU
Option Option was
HEU
Cost
of
of
Inventories
Late
Enriched Additional
Fuel Unobligated
predominantly
LEU
Production.
Deliveries
.....
Options
Cumulative
Options
Uranium
2
Start 3
......
Production ..
Reactor
......
Demand
......
Fuel
of
Uranium
LEU
Levelized
,
......
for
Options
for
......
Sources
.
..
Through
..
Demand
Fuel
Technologies Uranium
......
Unobligated Material
SWU
Down-Blending
Through
Management
.
Process
...... for
......
.
..
......
Department
.
for
......
Cash
of
...... Requirements
U.S.
2060
Through
Unobligated
TVA
produced
(Existing
.
2060
......
......
......
Navy
Flow
.
.....
.
......
LEU
......
......
......
Plan ......
Tritium
......
......
of
......
......
......
Range nuclear ......
2060
....
Through
Energy
Fuel..
Sources)
......
......
between
.
......
.....
.....
Uranium
......
......
.....
..
......
for
..
...... I
...
October 2060
......
.
......
......
....
......
......
....
......
......
......
......
......
I
......
Page
. 2015
.. ..
..
266 255
388 388 288 ... 377
10
22 11 15 14
16 21 18 24
.
4 6
vii Abbreviations
ATR AFS APT
AVLIS
DOD CLWR DOE CSA
EU HEU DP INL EOT DUEP LEP EM LEU ENW MDA MOX NNSA MTU NR SRS SILEX NASA swu SMR SNF TPBAR RPD NRC PPD TRL NU TVA REU PGDP NWS
Y-12 U.K. USEC VHEU UJWG
IS
Accelerator Advanced Atomic American
Commercial Canned
U.S
U.S. Electromagnetic Highly Energy Defense Idaho Excess Depleted Enriched Mixed Life Metric Low-Enriched Mutual National National Separation Naval Small Nuclear Spent Natural Tennessee Nuclear Tritium-Producing Savannah Paducah Technology Separat Presidential Repurposed Requirements
Y-12 Very United Uranium United
.
Department
Department
Extension
Tritium
Highly
National
National
Reactors
Modular Nuclear
Oxide
Tons
Enric Other
Vapor
States Defense
Northwest
Kingdom
Subassemb
iv
Uranium
Programs Weapons
Regulatory
Aeronautics
Nuclear Gaseous
Uranium
Uranium
e
Inventory Assured
Test
River
Work
Valley
of
Production
hed
Light
Readiness
Enriched
Policy
Excess and
Isotopes Laser
E
Security Uranium
Program
and Fuel
Reactor
Reactor Laboratory
nri
Agreement
Site
of of
Uranium
Isotop
Security
Enriched
Unit
Diffusion Water
Authority
Stockp
chment
Fuel
Enrichment
Defense Energy Planning l
Directive
Burnable
y
Commission
Working Uranium Isotope
and
Uranium
e
Level by
Supply Complex
of
Separation
Reactor
il
Space Tritium
Laser Administ
e
Corporation
Uranium
Plant
Separation
Document
Absorber
Group
Project
Administration Excitation
Program
ration
Management
Department
Rod
(now
Centrus
Plan
of
Energy
Energy
Through
Corp.)
I
October
2060
I
Page
2015
1 The
I. Consolidated
In
Appropriations
addition,
Appropriations
supply
(2) uranium
(1) uranium (3) and "
a (b)
term House
weapons
''
production
(a)
(b)
viable
an an a
the
Legislative
•
•
Not
enriched
The
description
costs
assessment analysis
of
needs
analysis
for
an enriched
a
national
Section
tritium
later
Department
management
through
cost-benefit
Representatives and
dismantlement
Appropriations
accounting
defense
to
Act,
oft
for
uranium
the
than
of
of
his
supplier.
provided
312(b)
security
2015
of
uranium
tritium
2060; planned
Department
the
of
June Tritium
report
the
p
.
urposes,
the
shall
analysis
House
(Pub.
for
of
plan
Department
of
30,
and
''
Language
national the
train."
,
by
and
Act
wa national Title
and
and
provide
and
2014,
that
L.
(a){3)
of
enriched
current
,
s
including
down-blending.
2014
113-235),
of
of initiated
the
alternative
tritium
Ill,
Representatives
Enriched
provide
Energy
eoch
security
the
shall
Division
Senate
a
s
(Pub
ecurity
of
report
and
Se
uranium
to
of
Energy's
a
include
by
s- c
.
should requires
future
meet
the
Uranium
retary preliminary
L.
not
demand
technologies
Section
D
purpose
to
113-76)
,
options
oft
later
the
defen
for
a
plan
the
availability
shall
and
he
detailed
that
Committees
311 national
Management
for
than
s
,
Tennessee
Consolidated
se the
to
which
available
submit
through
co
:
Department
tritium
of
needs provide
s
which
Senate
April
t
Title
estimate
and
states: security
of
to
;
30,
2060;
/ow-enriched and are
schedule and
Ill,
Valley
to
on
the
adequate
a
2015 s Plan
tritium
Division
Appropriations
and
available
upply
low
of
Committees
of
purpose
and
Authority
Energy
the
Further Through
and
that
estimate
enriched
and
amounts
near-
D,
highly
includes:
to
uranium
s,
of
enriched
I
including
meet
Continuing
October
no the
2060
and
on
to
of
uranium
enriched
longer
af
build
,
long
the
the
highly
I
tritium
Page
2015
a
be
2 Further
All Finally, Energy
legislative
security
interagency only consideration
maintained Nuclear Representative The
provide
and
House
Committee
Continuing
after
Water this
Weapons
requirements.
language
the
Report
by
certification
reevaluation
Secretary
of
the Developm
and
Appropriation will
the
113-486
Council
Department
Tritium
requirements
consider
the
fi
sca
To
Senate
of
to
ent l
of
certifies
year
ensure
Energy
as
and
the
the
further
Appropriations
incorporated
s
that
2016
Committees
Act, of
Enriched
active
that
are
and
Energy
to
2015,
the
investments
budget
the
listed
the
and
the
revalidated
Committees
Uranium
represent
states
Secretary
results
reserve
in
in
not
request,
Act,
the
Appendix
later
that
in
Title
of
Join
Management
tritium
domestic
tritium the
such
of
:
than
the
t
on
Department
Ill
Defense
Explanatory
minimum
,
B
Appropriations
Nuclear
Division
analysis
.
stockpile
March
stockpile
enriched
conduct
Plan
1,
Weapons
active
D
are
of
requirements
Statement
ofthe
2015.
amounts
Energy
available
Through
uranium
a
and
of
bottoms-up
Consolidated
the
Council
reserve
I
to
for
October
House
for
capabilities
2060
be
,
and
the
should
national
I
of
the
Page
2015
and
3 The II.
responsible uranium Defense-Related
Non-Defense
in ceased
remain Most
i - :5 · ~so
:s
~
~
;: ::::0 E
0
u ~
1992
1
Figure
and
• • • 70 00 4 • 90 •
50 20 0 •
30 •
1
Department
0
0 0
0
1
of
945
+- +-
Introduction
system
Highly HEU HEU medical Low-enriched HEU application
Higher-assay HEU 1992
enriching
in
(Figure
these
(EU)
------
------
1
operation
.
for
for
to
for in
1
was History
950
in
National
enriched
s
requirements
s
fuel
,
a
upport
1). future naval
isotope
varying
and
of
number
Missions
uranium
predominantly
s
None research
Energy's
1
. (e
955
LEU
other
of
propulsion
uranium
.
Tritium
National g
of
Priorities
uranium
U.S
.
p
assays
,
roduction
(above of
prior
Mutual of
for
1960
.
research
the
HEU
national
National
reactors
are
use
(LEU) and
and
to
Aeronautics
---
U.S
five (HEU) supplied
programs
Production
for
Defense
1
conversion
in
965
.
Enriched
chemical
and
purposes
Government
nuclear to
and
U.
missions
for
Nuclear
to
"Highly
support
·M • · •
S.
research
sh
A
Primary
1
1
medical
Data
le .
ll
0
os maintain
from 970
ut
Yoar
Navy Agreement
prod 4
s
(powering
down
t
5
ly
s
and
weapons
.
forms
Uranium
MT
from
to
Enr
N
than
u
Security
that prod
Material
ava
c
the
U
(some ti
production
1 i
nuclear
LEU
on
ched
Space
us
975 p
tho
applications l
isotope
u
r fa
Reac
od
ction
ce
.
20
the
U.S. req
DOE
cilities
publicly
u
a
The fuel)
c
Uranium
ce
D •
CJ70"'
sed
l
s
ea
t
percent
aircraft
>• oo" in
ors
f
Management
uir
f d
Administration
,
rom
1
nuclear
Admin
n
J HEU Of)
produced
980
propulsion In
ou
ro
anuary
1964
to t
missions
.,., fuel
o
e
Department
production
1 m
c c
1992
1
t
roloasod built
OQ oo
95
a
activi
:
of
p
I)If
~ Striking
s
9
4 reliable
rod
4
tockpile.
f------1
i
carrier
t w
th
1
235
a
s
2001
5
ty
ri
9
weapons
ith tration
u
nd
r
to to
8
o
ction
tium
throug
U)
5
u
t
1992
v
gh h
creating
between
produce or
stopped
e
a
to
applications
s
Ports atter
Ba 1
s
supp Plan
965
lon
1 h
1
and
and 990
l
fue
(DOE/NNSA)
of
ance",
(NASA)
The
996)
of 1
m
965
stockpi
Energy
ou
other
l
Through ly
submarines)
this
research
th
this
all
United
1964 of
1995
HEU
programs,
enriched
demand
inventory
re
l
e
I
s
October
earch
2060 States
production
is
reactors
are:
I
power
Pa
2015
g
for
e 4 storage.
The
other production Council included of to with (including eliminating them. made available blended MTU
LEU
reactors,
E05 5 MTU 3
4
Anno
2
H
Hi
January This
October March
ighly
g
HEU
these
hly
United
Declaration
derived
un
the
amount
of
earmarked
forms
E
Enriched
in
ceme
n
1,
to
review
riched
HEU
2001,
2005
24,
much
uses
Declaration's
The
HEU
1995,
for
and
be
naval
nt
States
in
the
2005
was
that
from
excess
national
;
permanently
High
inventory
Uranium for Uranium
as
in
1992
and,
(the
President
of
begun
possibility
l
propulsion)
specifically weapon
Memorandum
ater
well.
to
are
l
down-blending
this
y
the
Jul
produced
EOS
Enriched
and
support
to
in
y
difficult
(HEU)
Final
security original
crease
29,
HEU
in
Figure
Tritium
policy.
U.S
C
declaration),
also
by
linton
s
1994)
1996,
Environmental
and .
of
,
withdrawn
September
" declared
Uranium
defense
d t d
allocated
other
included
application.
more
using
from
and/or
2
Speech;
o
excess
U.S
purposes,
weapon .
and
3
s
175
how
The
.
to
Linton
Department
programs
:
than
MTU this
Enriched
Str
needs
LEU
excess
s the February
costly
HEU
President's
unusable
160
the
ik
over
30,
Impact
.
material components,
F
ing
.
1000
4
.
Secretary
including
Brooks
Any
for
excess
MTU
In
1996,
(the
a
to
time
by
Ba
6,
u
of
keeping
Uranium
Statement
metric
use
ses,
recover material
l
the
1996;
ance,
Energy
,
S94
HEU
for
for
NNSA
from had
Declaration
uranium
as
S94 such
tritium
of
naval
declaration,
nuclear
Revi
Secretary
contained
tons
LEU
working
741
with
Record
Energy
Admini
.
.
use
Declaration
Management
rejected
sion
The
as
and
propulsion
MTU
(MTU)
Department
production
use
this i in
nventorie
1
s
of
explosive
President,
O'Leary
trator
nuclear
committed
research
was
inventory,
Decision
as
intent,
of
within
by
based
of
fuel
:
HEU
made
"
i
the
Secretary'
HEU Openn
s
use,
s
warheads.
encumbered
Plan
.
for
for
use
spent
DOE/NNSA
and
in
reactor
in
on
of
Navy
In
before
with
the
an and
ess inventory.
s
1995,
with
a Energy
or
a
pace
Through
the
second
s
additional
Nationa
Disposition
Initi
nuclear
would
other
S
material
the
ec
the
fuel
restrictions
declared
5
at stopping
and
urity
iv
intent
However,
I
has
remaining and e.
consistent military October
declaration
2
2060
be
l
research
fuel I
nitiative
Security
This
of
down
in
200
redirected
is
Surplus of
secu
174.3 (SNF)
not
I
on
Page
MTU
the
2015
for
re
40
or
5 I : : , : r-
1 : I :
or As
6
7 8 Over Figure production, and programs excess United by been
______
No HEU
Spent
Naval Fuel
DNN- EOT-
FRR MTU
Poieritiai Reactor ~
e.g., For
6
2
11
(DOE
3
19
MTU
MTU
current Prog
down
weapons
one
Supply
MTU
dispo
GTRIHEU
MTUofHEU
Research
foreign
.75
LE
Disposal
c
the
down-blended
Spen Othe
onv
U a
r
-
EM)
Forecast
am 2.
s
material
Foreign
p States ofthe
Fuel
Excess
pl
ition
Defense
-
Metric ercent
r
t
a
ssa
e
blending eo·
last
HEU
n
HEU
DOE
rsion
have
s
y
for
1----
~
•
r-:
demand
and
stockpile
s
160MTU- se
two
20
above
22
, : :
I :
:
I ~ '
and
235
Other
of
Excess
Research
Tons MTU produced
MTU
declarations
declarations
U
nonproliferation
H
Nuclear
.
decades,
E
HEU around
U
5
8
.
- MTU
160
associated p
2005 1994
<
20
Uranium
f
FOI'8ign
Restricted
u
20
inventories e
HEU
Roughly
1
Tritium
4
153
1
MTU 200 175
ele
rc
f MTU
IV
(tritium
22 use Other
6MTU
MTU
MTU
(HEU
Res/noted MTU
r
T
e
some
om
U
MTU
Reactor Reactors MTU
MTUWaste d Declaration
Declaration
MTU
Nonproliferation
nt
(EOT) fuel
(594)
(E05)
the
(no
HEU
Obligations
Naval
Forecast
Inventories
research
S
Dow
Other
LEGEND
DOE
Rejected
235
allowed)
p
to
ofHEU
items
. t
Useable
di e
of
ritium)
of through
HEU
6
nt peaceful Research
n
•
U
for 7 world
use R
HEU
and
-Blend HEU
s
40
HEU
HEU
•
.
eactors
8
mantled
with
GTR
has
by
on
U initiat
MTU continue
r
N
I Enriched
.
eac
S.
R)-
.
f-1
f-
be
LEU
the
To
20
53 commercial
tor
6M
e
for
of
-
i
M
n
M ves
weapons
s TU
date
TU
ru
fuel
HEU
useable actively
to
-+
Down-Blending
+
•
to
i
19
s
Uranium
blended
28
, restric HEU
6
I
and tritium,
be
n
met
Di
.
blended
more
used
MTU
down-blended,
75
153
MTU
be
nuclear
production
production
s
material
Program
restricted
drawn
us position
p
Disposition
ted
to
down MTU target
e
pow
e
to by
for
,
to
e
xces
rc
GTRIIFRR
4
able
than
,
be
comply
f
be
MTU ent
tritium
can weapon
r
down
to
om
Management
down
e
Is
down·
for
s -
b
down,
r
s
LEU bl
be
e use
may
Department
HEU
plant
146
used
Program
e
-
-
. nding
blending
with
MTU
remains
s
the
for
and
the
HEU
re
.
Department
of
These
Plan
for
se
U
two
the
of
from
available
.S. arch
research
Energy
Through
HEU
e
declarations.
down
x
reactors,
the
ce
ss
declared
i
S94
s to
I -
material
reactors
blending
repurposing
October
2060
down
and
isotope
excess
All
I
-
EOS
blend
Page ha
in
20
U.S
s
the
1
.
5
.
6 This
The tritium meet meet demand support production alternatives
viable 2060
Department
report
.
the those
This
supplier
and
of
and
diverse
national
document
outlines
capabilities,
needs
for
presents
of
the
is
needs
irradiation
in
providing
security
the Department
the
offers
potential
Tritium
Department's li
production
future.
ste
d
objectives
analyses
services
this
above
(EU)
and
actions
should
document
resources
Enriched
technologies,
for
to
of
plans
.
to
the
support
This
as
demand
ensure
long
Tennessee
to
for
document
Uranium
to
s
managing
as
umma
sat
tritium
and
and
an
possible,
i
sfy
adequate
supply
cost
rize
Management
Valley U.S.
also
production
Department
the
it
est
national
s
as
provides
scenarios,
plans
Authority
imate
d
well
supply
i
minishing
.
and as
s
security
Plan
needed
an
options
of
of
material
options
(TVA)
assessment
tritium
Energy
Through
stockpile
demand
to
no
for
for
meet
use
and
I
lo
continuing
October
nger
2060
managing
of
restrictions,
of EU
through
future
HEU
be in
I
Page
to
2015
a
to
7 to three
system
Tritium U challenged III. decay Unobligated Directives quantities Tritium
from Tritium supply percent and radioactive
test production The recycle requirements The documents. DOE/NNSA components, weights Planning meet
' meet
Pr
d
.
S
a
supply og
t
.
ed
• •
r
nuclear
sent
Nuclear
overall
data
a
J
its
m
.
the requirements ul requirements
s
,
of
y National
re
Active Facility
and
reservoirs
although
per
1 decay
have
depend
quir
Demand
to
5,
Document
to
these
tritium
military's
needed (PPDs)
2
e
by
011
schedules
tritium decay, is
the
recovery,
year. m
ensure
deterrent
Weapons
Drawing
e
the
including
responsible
,
the
nt continue
stockpile
products,
a
infrastructure
Savannah
nd
systems
d
on
oc
is
and
naturally
required
s
fact
Thus,
from
for
um ubo
replenishment
demand
availab
performance
.
that
the
are
(RPD),
e
r
nt
din
subordinate
supp o National
are
that
systems
Tritium
Council
s
n
tritium
to
a ,
inactive LEU
military
laid (with f
Security
after
l
t weapon
o
and
a
the
e
w
for
developed
River
plann
le
be
working
ly
amount
occurring
which
f
tritium
r
out
requirements
o
to
infrastructure,
m
RPD,
returned
met.
defining
(Required
as
12.3
i
n
and (NWC)
Pr Security
fill
g
require
support
Site
s
requirements in for
weapons
esi
d
ociated
performance
oc characteristics
defines
through
weights
d
DOE/NNSA
implementing
years, U.S.
ument radioactively
e
Enriched
inventory of
nti
(SRS)
in
and
a
directs
tritium,
tritium
l
Tritium to
nuclear
P reservoirs
s
minute
purposes
national
o
Minimum
appr
trit
Demand li
one-half
inventory
adjusted
cy
stockpile
tritium
and
.
are
production
ove
D
i
reserves,
i
um
Uranium
r
,
the
e
fill
d b
defines
aged
and ctive for DOE/NNSA
subdivided
over
quantities
weapons
y
decays fills); for
.
weights
security
th documents
development
facility
filled
weapon
9
of
Maintaining
e Inv a
based
.
(
quantities,
P
Nu reservoirs
the
a
presidentia
PD
the
Because
entory)
c
range
and
its
Production
·
Management is
l
e
9)
with
a
to
entire
,
r
vital
where
stockpile
DOE/NNSA
Plan ,
Fi
for
W Department
requirements
on
for
into must
s
other
must
yield helium-3
c eapons
a
of
l
tritium
.
assessments
each
Ye 9
to
at
some
of
in
the
based lifecycle
ar environmental
the
of
s
the
maintain
l
be
Co s
ensuring
SRS Tritium
ly factor
Record
active
and
20
the
u
weapon
follow
(NWS)
mandated
nc
11
manufactured
required
ga
tritium
;
(
(
il
-
tritium
3
Plan 3
20
.
on
the
H)
He)
s
Requirement
s of
1
.
of
weapons
is
7
to
for
ga
PPDs
Annual
Nuclea
an
Energy
analy
categories:
that
Presidential
removed,
at
the Through
of
ensure
system s.
is
weapon
inventory
inventory
supply a
available
r
To
lo reserve.
weapon
and
conditions
an rate
Wea
s
st
is
and
tritium
en
are
I
adequate
p
of to
to
tritium
o
other
October
in
of
2060
s s
ns
of
separated
s
ure
avai
produce
natural
and
removed
order
S
5
t
Policy
. inventory, tritium
o i adequate
. These
s
c
5
These
k
active
lost l
related
p
I
able
will
ile
Page
to
2015
Pla
to
the
n
is
fill
(U
8
) operating The Variables which on In
reviewed their
Tritium Committee peak
certification shown detail. to ceramic of energy Tritium
Extraction
fiscal
tritium
remove
future
• • • •
re
process of
s
consists
System sites
Laboratory Hedge production in Presidentially
ult
for
year
2800
pellets
Production
that
Figure
against tritium
s
contractors,
from
Facility
the
the
of
(NWCSSC)
and
letter.
(FY)
for
grams
the
and
drive
tritium of
pipeline
nuclear
contained TVA
3,
SRS);
in certifying
2015, the demand.
its
review
in
reserve
research, the
outage);
commercial
's
Classified
the
per
size,
January
mandated
best
CLWR
from
Action
Tritium
irradiated conducted
weapons
DOE/NNSA,
(tran
quantities
18-month
were
types
within
planning
(tritium
the
The
-
and,
irradiated
irradiated
sit
deve
2007.
Officer
Appendix
and
tritium
presented
of
of
net
light
strategic
program
tritium-producing
TPBARs
lopment
warheads
weapon's a
in
cycle.
required
Enriched
information
result
along detailed
s,
water
these
TPBARs
production
the
TPBARs
D
are
reserves.
is to
with
was ,
di
NWCSSC,
and categories
reactor
currently ,
sc
to
Gas
the
review
Uranium
and
sent
u
a
and
the
reactivate
was
sses
surve
to
projected
Nuclear Transfer
the
to
requirements
s
date
national
package
burnable
s
the
of
(CLWRs)
and
ucce
the
illanc
readiness
produced
include
Management
the
se
and
the
Weapons NNSA
ssf
Department
weapons
Systems
variables,
e;
tritium
tritium
it
laboratorie
ully
the
absorber
NWC.
owned
for
tritium
Tritium
states
by
completed
sensitivity
and
use
production
inventory
to
irradiating
Council
or
The
or
and
. thus
Plan
and
fills
.
protect
rods
of
The
s
demand
Extraction
These
information
and
operated
Energy
from
and
Through
issuing
first
these
Standing
(TPBARs)
at
and
responsible
variable requirement against the
the
DOD
NNSA
drivers,
requirements
I variables
an
stockpile
Facility
SRS
October
by
2060
deployment
NWC
and
was
with
aluminate
a
TVA.
extraction
s
Tritium
were
in
Safety
I
used
at
high
Page
more
have
at
2015
As
SRS
it
in .
s
9 Tritium
To current tritium Act. Commercial Alternative of undertaken The alternative
production increases potential 11 requirement 10 Commercial
irradiate
This
TPBAR
the
inform
10
two-reactor
WesDyn PNNL
.
..
document
second
While
s
requirements
currently
TPBARS
projection Producrng
can
9Months
[
variations
the
e its
Light
Manufacture
1
as
to
6
a
only
Light
s. 0 ...
the
future
Agent
in
Supplemental
likelihood
. continu esrgn
reactor
11
meet
would ......
supp
Water
Rod
·
the
be
plan
draft
This
is
Water
s
in
Component
l
ements
produced
require T
CLWR
decisions
the Tritium in
s
es be
Advanced
Reactor
erted
Tritium
and
alternative is i
t R t Figure
would
ng
CLWR
demand
INL
closer
eactor
co
:-----·
demand
that
Reactor
to
the now
into
nsidered
SEIS
s
sig
(DOE/E
u
Environmental to
./
tritium 3.
likely SEIS
se
1999
and
in just to
fresh
nificantly
the Irradiate
expects
and
Current
can
.
only
meet
Commercial
as
could
(CLWR
issued
normal I
Enriched
Environmental
S
•
fue begin
Irradiation
Suppliers
the
-
the
Reactor be
it
2088)
one
requirements
Watts
l.
mitigates
Rods
18
these
handled
to
Final increa
If
most
NNSA
increasing
amount SEIS)
in
Months
. in reactor
two
s
need
In
August
the
Uranium
at Bar
I
TVA
mpact
increased
CLWR
reactor
reliable
se
TVA
pursuant
Tritium
impact
early
with of to
1,
both
-
TPBAR
fuel
the
use
Watts
2014
will
s
production
SEIS
Statement
are
relatively
2020s.
Statement operational
Management
scenario
replaced
Extraction
Department
two
Production
be requirements,
Tritium
Facility
used, to
loading
expected
identified
Department Bar
met.
the
.•
TVA
'•
··
the
This
Unit
during
for
to National
sma for
to
J
./
. '
6Months in reactors amount
··
Unde
ensure
the alternative ... and
meet
to
the 1 the
Process
DOE/NNSA's
ll
ha
a
.
Plan
(WBN1)
..
changes
be Production
refueling
..
r
s
Extract
. production
DOE/NNSA
Production
existing
..
of
the
of
continued
tritium from
Environmental
i
·
ssued
to
Through adequate
Energy fre
two
·
produce
s Tritium ·
NAC
Rods
.
··
h
outage,
was
·
in
DOE/NNSA's
fuel ··
of
reactor
later
requirements.
·
reactor
· fresh
preferred
Tritium ··
I
analyzed
risks
needed ha
of to
2060
.
October
tritium
i.e.
this
tritium. s
Tritium
assess
fuel
to
one and
in
Policy
plan,
I
year.
to
a
TVA's
Page
-
third
as
2015
its
in
Use
a 10
of foreseeab
recommended reactors DOE/NNSA reduced between
fabrication, technologies nuclear obligations Unobligated and Under restrictions U.S
production of unencumbered in Figure The uranium the introduce
TPBARs,
th
at inconsequential. additional 12 much
T e
lea the
such
he .
core
number
(2)
nuclear
demand M
st
more
R U Uranium
1lhn
Mining,
figure
e the
three
4
.
.
S.
mor
peaceful
fimng restrictions.
material
9 slightly I shows
until
to
fre f
both
interage
.
l
once-
efficient peaceful
e
a
current
e
.
nd
ana
s
derived
the
consists
time
and
requirements
h
fre nonproliferation
,
of
and
These
for
an
production
fuel LEU
Obllg;won
reactor
s
burn
maximum ly
reactors
the
s
h tritium
by
s
in
ncy commercia
use
zed unobligated
adequate
maxim
l is fuel
asse
y.
require
each
interpretation
Fuel e
U
a
production
restrictions
use
i from
d
If
s entirely
.
encumbrances
this
Currently, wou
significant
S.
mblie
Tritium
fuel
re
one
s
i
zes
viewing production
and
nuclear
obligations
reactor
used Requirements
ld
outer
can use
Figure
r
equipment,
that
l
s
.
eac
the
evel
repla
tritium
and
Tritium l
believes
of
b
power
tor
of
and LEU use and,
policy
e
al
any
that
ce
in
and LEU
limit used
, come
each .
nonproliferation
t
foreign-origin challenge
4. er
in
of
fuel
of
FY
reactor
nativ
Enriched
to
inventory
thi
a nuclear
program
unobligated
must
Commercial that
production processing
again,
llo
reactors
these
and
derived
of
2019
that
s
LEU
that
a
from
w
and
two
es
irradiating
lesser
fuel
for
i
U.S.
to
s
had
be
fuel
i.e
it
fuel re
and
to
infr
both restrictions,
weapons
pea
two
will
.
to
actor
Uranium
considered
from
burned
Tritium
from
only
the being
is
international
extent,
fuel.
core be
astructure
ce
uranium, required
add
attained,
pathway
will
need
sources:
free
ful
burned Production
s
been
tritium
policy
cenario,
the
no
U.S.
Variations
u
loaded a
a employed
remain
s
seco from
e sec material
fewer
the
more
Management burned
Production
commercial
obli
Government.
three
all
restrictions.
for
ond
at
processing
nd
involved
production
was at
that
total
ga
(1)
Department
conversion, foreign
into
each
agreements
and
than
tritium
tions
which at
TPBARs
in
t
once
of reactor
load foreign
im
s
TPBAR
for
are
the
Fabrocat
number
third
be
TVA es
LEU
a
stage
e
a
or
s
d
would defense
Fuel
in free
produced time maximum peaceful
total it
market
wi
production
twice
tim
12
equipment,
loading Fuel
reactors to
applies
Plan
supplying
program
in
imposed
th
1
on
of
e,
of
enrichment
meet
the
of
be
the
the
of
of . for
the
the
Through pea Allowing
. Energy
con
TPBARs
purposes
5,000
to
that maximum
-
mid
peaceful loading
The
use
unobligated
using
currently
fuel for level tritium
s
cef
.
idered
peaceful
unobligated do
-
is
2020s. obligations
potential
ul
or
Power
tritium
TPBARs
a
fue
cycle not Commercial
Operation
I
in , to
material
u
2060
function
technologies;
October
p
may
fuel
numb
small
s
l
mu
r
both uses
r
e
to
oduction be
equ
Reo~~ctor
fuel
a
b
use
s
e s
t be
er I
ire
or
to
of s burn s
be
i Page
s
of hown
s,
and
of u
2015
.
sed
free
ed
11 Separative irradiated
then enrichment alternative Decision, applicable DOE/NNSA' ensure and The approximate approximately in be Existing
TVA 2027 Fuel that comes ca obligation half Project
for USEC operations the certain
this
20 of 13
co 1 react
of
4
U.S. Reactors
lled both mplet
Energy,
2015.
reduced
MTU,
the
to
Tritium
Paducah
of
contract
or
and
was Supply
gradually
assuming
D
Purchases
Centrus
add
reload
a from
that ely
e
duration
reactors
deliveries
(DUEP)
partment
reactor
USEC
Supply origi or May increasing
.
replac
unobligat
review
exchanges
Work
a
approach,
s Increasing
in
in
LEU no
Plan) one-half Readiness
prior
ly would
second current
Gaseous
occurred 2014
nall
June
each
, 1/3 entered Energy increase
2025.
e obligated
a
which
fuel.
until
approximate
of reload
of
Units
second
of
y
identified
under
would
e LEU
contain
of Energy,
d
in
2012,
the
reactor
Unobligated the
13
reactor reactor
tended
expectation
of
a
Tritium
an
with This
and
the
Corporation).
purcha
Diffus
will
(SWU) Program
on
tritium Under core
into
a remaining. the
TPBAR
the
adequate
be
reactor
uranium the
this
reactor
Tritium
October number
DOE/NNSA
increases
provide
the
.
core,
l
TPBAR
y
three
unobligated
a
each)
ion
TPBARs National
in
to
one-third
s
contract
and needed uranium
such
es
Mixed
program.
the
supply loading
th
Readin Plant Baseline
comes
from
for
reload-is
e
sources
Enriched
LEU remains
of
ofTPBARs
tritium
ear
10 loading 1,
previous (see a
The
both
tritium
scenario,
unobligated Most
2014,
of
Oxide Environmental
ess from (PGDP)
is
reloads.
ly
the unob was
enrichment for
Figure in
t
second
currently online
h
2020s.
ma
Subprogram
(Tr
When
eir
the
th
of
inventory
United
of
on two in
Tritium
amended
a
from
te
Uranium
l iti e
(MOX)
reactor
expected
igated
production
unobligated
5,
domestic
the
irradiated this
prior
Watts
amount
um rial.
each
The
tritium
reactor
in
not
source
USEC
The
material
the reactor
Readiness uranium material contemplating,
i
States
ng
The fue
third
to
services
LEU
material
reload,
Tritium
Production
Bar
is second
the
Policy
to
r
mid
Management
l
decided its
e
to
of
production
during
attained,
is
uranium final load
Backup
in
be
2
is
1
source
shutdown.
Enrichment be
unobligated
the
- "d Department when
fuel
that 2020s.
reactor to
a
Production
s
has before
reactor reaching a
Act
agreement
loaded
must single delivery
to reactor Subprogram
eac
fixed
implement
Depleted
for
to
already
USEC
TVA
and
h tritium
Inventory
provides
enrichment
at
14
u
refueling terminate
tritium
subject
se cleanout
- to
would
any
reactor
quantity
which
's
The
into
issuance
Plan
Fuel
unoblig will
The 1504
of
had 1504
Corporation
tritium
feed
TPBARs
of
been
Uranium
production
unobligated
on
first
Sup
a
require
a
Through
remain
outage. last
four
production through Energy already
Tritium
time to
notation).
TVA
Project.
TPBARs
two-reactor
beginning
requires a
December required
ply
t
contract
enrichment
ed
completion
s
source.
used,
program
of
of
ource
reloads Plan,
reactor
are
the fuel.
a
this
two
In
Enrichment
at
I
produced
Record
Production
(USEC)
2060
in
order inserted
October
with
U.S. loading
begins)
1504
higher
The
of
and
LEU
LEU
where
reload
in
30,
through
reactors
fuel
in
D
third
FV just to
epart
-a
I
the
of
under
TPBARs
the
of
(now
1999,
Page
h
2019
and
may
ave
s
bout (to
2015
at
only
one
m
Fall (of
e
a
12 nt
tails Depleted
interrelated DUEP the (DUFG) DUFG. deliver individual percent. MOX reimburses
production
could DOE/NNSA on
down-blender mitigate utility used performing DOE/NNSA market LEU instead Backup
DOE/NNSA The inventories Project until replacement memorandum
15
but
Th
schedule.
higher
s
to
e
delivered
ti baseline
for it Backup
was
ll
unobli
provide
having
The
to
produce
the
high
is
for
or
LEU it
the obligation
ENW
needed Energy
will
Uranium
reactor
i
any
price
project nitiated
g remaining
tritium enough
TVA
agreement
down-blended
unable
must t
transactions ated of
inventory
he potential
to
sources before
This
be
public
LEU to
ob to
other retained
between
down-blending unobligated
for procure
paid
DUF
Northwest
DOE/NNSA used
li
exchange retain
by
reloads
to
action
gated
produced
production.
to
Inventory in
the exchanges
6
Enrichment b
TVA
TVA
transfer
utilities
averaged
for
e e June
Tritium
435 deliver.
of
liability
for
are
with
cost
47
conomically
approximately
unobligated the
the additional
LEU
whereby
for was
needs
and
obligation
MTU
expected
2012 17.1
MTU
the
TVA.
(ENW), differential
enriched
unobligated
respective tritium from approximately
with
to
0.4
of
taken
and
associated will
The
(flags)
obligations as and
DOE/NNSA MTU
make 3
it the
to
of
perc
Project
for
replacement
these
Enriched keep the LEU r
cost
the
employ
e
LEU
to
which
providing material.
- to
production.
enriched exchanges.
LEU e of
with
tritium
obligation uranium
nt
Department
provide fuel.
provide resultant
40
of
DOE/NNSA
fuel the unobligated
(the
transactions
235
LEU)
with
are
down-blending
percent
obligated in (DUEP) U,
PGDP before
does
TVA
482
Uranium
. before This
which
difference
turn
production,
shown
the
If
for
an
assurance through
fuel
four
this
MTU
reactors
LEU exchanges,
not
is
Obligation This
tore-enrich
extension
contracted
this
natural
i
the
of
s
enough
transferred
offices
a
if
w
reloads
inventory
uranium
HEU in
plan
and,
the refueling
is
e Management
DOE/NNSA
of
agreement
fuel
LEU
ll
Table
unobligated
between
May
b
LEU,
e Department
LEU fueled
to
DOE/NNSA
to
to
uranium the
. according
low
in
has
unobligated
of
exchanges establish in
potential
and
use
2013.
accordance
1 with
enriched
produced th purchased
HEU high-as
.
the a
i to outage
s depleted
e
until
refueling
the
arrange
needed
natural the
is
is
be
USEC
early
was
(NU)
unable
documented DUEP
Plan
LEU
to
Backup
provided
s market might
2024
an
MOX ay,
of
to
to
covered a made
uranium
to as
LEU
for
diluent
(173
by
inventory
uranium Through contract for Energy
for
replace with
approximately
was depleted
outage
.
compensation
to
mid-2020s
access customers TVA enrichment
DOE/NNSA
for
Inventory MOX
short-term
price
using
deliver
MTU)
a
its
by
l
.
e
over
series
by
on
v
I
in
tritium Most the
MOX
e
caused
with hexafluoride
fuel
2060 October
of
l
some
of allowing
uranium
this
the of a
and
10
LEU MOX
MOX
.
0 LEU
of
. and fuel itse
of TVA,
711
open
MOX
of
storage I
can
4
other
by
the
for and
Page
. that
lf the 4
fuel
Fue p to
2015 were
the e
will a
but
be
r
ce
l 1
13
5
nt from
of Options used DOE/NNSA
To and Department's
flags; until or Three through obligation-free Option
these unobligated ENW inventories.
Department TVA plans "book" (lack ENW reactor. using
Existing
MOX Inventory ENW
LEU
all
use
elements
i
a
to
of) DOE/NNSA s
of
retained
third-party to and,
Unobligated from Backup
Project flags
groups
fuel pursuing long-term
these
and
provide
these 1.
USEC
TVA,
send obligation
for
Negotiations
utilize DUEP
.
Preserve
for
formed
store
Table
LEU
ENW's
Obtaining
can
In
inventories
LEU
of
for
this
within
options
ur
ownership
tritium LEU
status
addition,
the
unobligated
ani
material
offices to
use
these
so
the
inventories
f
material
l
1
ags
status
a um
lu
exchange
47
ability LEU
.
them
DOE/NNSA
Available
Tritium TVA Uranium
Existing tion
435
173
at
Material
Baseline
20MTU
of
at4
at4.4%
production.
an
to
MTU
for
inventory.
companies
4
and
,
Unobligated
ENW
d
Fuel
the
.
implement
have
MTU
MTU
. agreements
95%
from of reserves
is 4%
TVA
to with
in
to
funded,
would
47 s
. fuel
Department
tritium
store
and
it
the
a
portion
Certain
Inventory
been
Unobligated es,
Sources
by
this
MTU nuclear
the
Reloads
to
Reactor
for
Single
obligations
Enriched
using to
.
The
to
0
provide
these By
identify 10
required
material
4
.
identified
built, tritium
5
th
reactors coordinate
ofthe
preserve
combining
must of
nuclear
LEU
i UIWG's
s approach
of
fuel
their
Working
DUEP
obligation
must
and
Unobligated
Production
for
Uranium approximate
five
DUEP
be
Extends fabricator
production
Tritium
on
funding,
LEU
.
in
reserve
2024 2015 Until
2027
fuel
as placed
the
made
first
LEU;
Tritium
make
a
options
a
information
existing
candidates
manner
separate
material Group Inventories
suppliers
unobligated
are
task
"flags"
preserve
Management
with
LEU arrangements
tritium
in
.
expected
DOE
Uranium
reactors
that
operation
ly was
Production
Relative
(UIWG),
Cost
Department
LEU
similar as
the
DOE
one
Low Low produced
Low
LEU
at
will
the have
to
each
under
and
production
unobligated
enrichment
to and
companies
reload
inventory.
id
status
. work
underlying
to
(Existing
to
decisions entify composed
The
indicated
provides
.
HEU
Plan Option
Minimal-Already be , Minimal-Under excha Low-DOE
that
for
in
with
for
of
of
UIWG
completed
fuel
2012
material
Through example
used
Energy LEU
can
ng
a
that
or Westinghouse
Sources)
At
TVA
1:
tritium
related
a
e
sources
they commodity
of
worked
fabrication
few
and
be obligations
reserves
DOE's
for preserve
own
owned
representatives
to
Risk
maintained
that I
are
years'
2013, the
by
2060
in
October
preserve
production
to
contract
the
with
request,
owned
contracting FY
, willing
with
could
DOE
the
must
until
the
2015.
I with
to
worth
facilities
Page
some
fuel
TVA
hold
2015
the
the
be
to
14 Costs in
Westinghouse Other unobligated
and directly has Westinghouse retai
In
LEU
Option
to Excess HEU. compen program DOE Of previous and
blender
unencumbered
status
obligation Preserve Westinghouse unobligated Fuel portion TV LEU Preserve
the
addition
be
the
A
,
1 reload
Westinghouse
n reduced
currently
is
for
FlaQs
reserves
ed
funded Tritium
Project potential This
of
total
current
Uranium
of
in
2.
s
with
for
book
ENW
ation.
down will
-
DUEP
free
a
program
Repurposed Table to
TVA
future
uranium
13.4,
(
"'
produce market
a
as
the
Readiness
,
stored
40
storage ly
-
through
portion
Fuel
sources
blending
HEU
a
(REU)
tritium
implementing
2
MTU)
Westinghouse
just
barter
.
,
use
began
Available
Option
Flags
value Material will
Tritium 47 in
43
60
at
at4 at4
at
over
approximately
are Program
in
of
of
the inventory
4.4%
of
producing a
MTU MTU
MTU
Program
arrangement Excess
. .
produce programs
tritium
4 4
fuel
the
unobligated
expected obligation
% %
in
of
11
and
barter
1:
early
and
LEU
derived
fabricator,
MTU
Preserve
.
a
Reloads
Reactor
TVA
Uranium material,
Single
production
new REU
,
budget
that
Enriched
210
portion
1.5
2015 most
reactor
such
1
1
is
to
"flags"
Reserve
279
derived i
excess
LEU
.
s
MTU
came
uranium.
be
NNSA
intended
Additional
and
of
as
which requests
MTU
. TVA Production no
product.
of
the
the
Uranium
Extends
of
Tritium
are
from is
reactors
HEU
the
more Until 2029 2028
2030
from
plans
unencumbered
expected
has
LEU
AFS
of
can
from
DOE
DOE
to
4
down
.
PGDP
in
.
than
produced
the and
Sources
95
be
to
down Due
Management
their
through
domestic
contracts
has
compen percent
used
unencumbered
-
MOX
Relative
or Cost
blending $2
to
to
Department
DOE
-
Low
Low arranged
Low
blend
reserves
~
from
run
increases
4
of
for
Back
to
million
is
existing
and
Unobligated
s
LEU for
utilities
expected
either
ate for
down
a
program,
-
total
however approximately Low-Covered unobligated Interagency Interagen
h be Up be Int Low-Covered Low-Covered
however, be
.
Plan down-blending,
the
for 1.5
owever
The
per
eragency
in
required
required
required
of -
Fuel
contracts obligation
blended
this
reloads E05
that
commercial
down
of
Through
Energy year
REU
to
,
13.4 ,
program,
c
the
material
a a declaration
a
Uranium
be
s
y
till
.
modification modification -
modification
program,
and
Agreement Risk
Agreement, Agreement
blending
used
of LEU.
Repurpos MTU
excess
have between
I
under
under under
exchanges
2060
4
unobligated October
are
.
5
currently
down
to
as
is of
DOE
year
included
the the the
HEU
intended
.
be
I costs
like
exces
;
;
The
Page
may may
e
may
TVA
s is
d
.
2015
.
or
The
s
15 --
~
TVA
working
contract unobligated
Because REU barter Procurement Inventory This One produce declining MTU compensated unobligated cost
remaining blending produce with
from less
The provided
Cumulative commercial Annual remaining Note Option with Escalated material blending provide with
~-
tritium
than
Program
UIWG
is option NNSA
NNSA
two this is
that Y-12,
$53/Kg
arrangement.
from
Total
3
with
10
of
for
215
215
from of
this what
option . to market
reactors
agreement
this
costs,
55
10.4
approximately
has
contracting purification,
Down-Blending
(only
individual
to the
production reactor
.
Total
TVA the
210
market
the
MTU
MTU TVA
The
actions
-representing material
MTU
for
of
cost
reduce
a
Table
developed
NNSA
MTU remaining
initial
.
combination
in
MTU
for the unencumbered
uranium
values
services
to
primary
.
of
of
million
should would
There .
fabrication
make
160
--
4.95 .
3. of
Table
LEU
Tritium for would
While
reactor
contracting of
3
The
could -
difficulties,
the
and
for MTU
Cost
the
LEU
MTU
s
results
$373
be
below with percent an are
Impediment
10
be
arrangements
3
3
EU REU
this
expect
down
produce remaining
National
MTU
.
will
encumbered option
shows
Profile
about
and was 4 of
largely
re
significant
mentioned
s
over
a
MTU
million
into
l
existing has for
oads
program
and
the
in portion
be
- difficu Enriched
structured
will
LEU,
blending
a
to a
a five
the the
worked
fuel, preserved that
for
contract
current
offset
u
unobligated
unit
year's
or more
s
pay
produce
but Security
ing
in
of 10.4
estimated
single-reactor l Option
l
fuel
National
ast
ties
advantages,
of
would .
to
allowing
contracting
cost
which
above TVA
but
These
appropriated
would
by
than Uranium the
four at worth
ensure
well
MTU
market
for
would
as
-
for
TVA's
of
unobligated).
commercial
for
to
,
64
derived
2
an
provide
eight
160 and 400
years
would
just
$1674/Kg
for
costs
FV
Security if
acquire E05
result
are
TVA MTU use
costs of
$105 extension $105
that
Ap
be
2016 avoided the
price
MTU
Management MTU
the
down
costs,
for Excess
underway.
declaration
years
in reloads.
has to
to
include
be ropriated of LEU
unencumbered the in
and
fund previous
the
fir down-blending Department
pay
avoid LEU
""
for
and
will the
4
of
unencumbered reduced
facilities
-
of
s
.
.
blending
and
of
resulting
95 t
timing TVA
An fuel
4 s ofthe HEU
4.95 FY
for 3
uranium
from
entire be
. excess
continuous
rather
preparing
$106 $211
75
percent
MTU
purcha
some
estimated
2017
the
.
costs
reactors.
This
unencumbered
down
Funds
p
percent
.
Plan
erce the
of
industry's
MOX
-
of
215
purification
unencumbered
than
inventories
mid-level 10
of
expenditure
s has
of
since
-
market
ing HEU
LEU,
nt
and blending
Through
are
.
the
Energy
the
4
MTU Backup
4
FV
tritium
LEU
barter been
and
.
$373 LEU
$110 $321 MTU
fuel
This
95
unobligated
planned
2018 Used
this
of
10.4
material
interest
,
percent
of
unobligated;
in
and
which
which
on
could
risks _.._
signed
million
is
I
.
. material
LEU and
campaigns,
and LEU 2060
Option
MTU
production
October
s
expected
This
Down
the
is
for
associated
for
and
therefore down FY Fuel
remaining
about
to fuel
would
in
.
LEU
$373
i
would
the
I
s $52
to
This
the 2019
ship
being
Page
HEU
1. the
-
will
the
.
2015
the to
50
be
16 Source The
materials unencumbered (E05) Most processing capabilities
inventories
This There these for HEU processing
for capacity contributes considering storage packaging.
Uranium
at NNSA
recovery program
Based
s
tritium
• • • •
• • reuse
ix
inventory
option
purification
along
of
years
materials
w are
on
materials
projected Test National material higher some remaining Alamos attractive National
the
ill
until
s
are
Proces processing for
in
historical
severa
(e.g.,
have
production
in
and
with
(created
and
This use
(FY
to EU
Reactor Y a
insufficient
National
Advanced
order -12's a
timely
assay
also
reduction
disposition
s
National comes
2019
capability
Nuclear
to
reactor capacity.
scrap s are
Security
Security
material certain
a
l
for
and
ing
intermediate
because
benefits Y
Nuclear
redirect
forecast
considered
-
to
throughput
12
not
HEU
Option
(ATR)
as
Facility, pathway manner
through
Tritium
down-blending
Security
(
meet
from
purposes
~
E05
a
fuel
Recovery
in Nonproliferation
20 Excess
to
Laboratory;
material
with by-product
of material
is
,
assessments,
Other
a of
or
associated
Regulatory
limited percent High process
and
considered
transition
the
National
3
mis form
scrap).
.
and
identified
utilization path
and
were
2025).
for
known
If
projected
missions
enriched Other
s
EOT
backlog,
at
.
Flux
this
materials
ion
reduces
variou
suitable
and
of
Enriched that
Y-12
re
the
selected
assay)
requirements inventories
a material and,
of
s
Isotope Security
services
The
requirements;
(EOT)
ources
to with
Integrated
lower Commission
, is
a
impurities
materials
metal
.
current
s
the
the
uranium
supports future
in
good
Source
materials scrap
project
safety
for
from
include:
down
a
Uranium
materials.
delivery
based
new
assay
and Reactor,
usable
is
to
is
long
production) material
candidate
identified.
materials
program
not and
uranium
of
risk produce
-
materials
Extraction
start funds in blending
Uranium
unalloyed
-
the or
and
term more various
on
(NRC) from
this used
future
form
schedule
by
morphology
Management
transition
etc.;
the
date
in
exceed
converting
to
backlog
storage
-ge -
suitab
the
-
forms for molybdenum in
Department
unobligated held
to
Iicensed
intent
that
prepare
this
include forms; This
Processing
recycle
the nerated
is
System
metal
meet
down
2005
not
for
by
current
l
exceed
material.
e option
near
that
effort for
without
to
for
non-Defense
these
concerns.
projected
customer
- Excess
from
commercial
National
and
the
material
blending
preserve
Plan
many
oxides
-
National
require
down
term
and
Faci
of
will
to processing
recovery
materials
recovery
production,
materials
dismantlement;
Through
processing
Energy
Based
prepare
Material
decades
l
for
-
unencumbered
ity. also
in
blending
s
Security
until
extensive
demand
because
to
the
Security
storage
down
The
Programs
processor
reopen
a
on
processing
capabilities
for
most I
form
FY
was
2060
for capability.
October ,
Declaration
long-range
majority
even
- Advanced
and
2019
and blending lon
to
but
the it at
estimated
valuable
suitable
a
preserve
g-term
I
Los
Page (DP)
is
for
s
L
ince
2015
l
EU
ess
of
and
,
17 most within changes large A period, will commercia be TVA of estimated available-a inventory
a (with Cumulative Nuclear Annual
Option
includes special As Escalated and The supporting potential availab VHEU programs.
Presidential
held
16
voided
rough
Pr
what
re-evaluated
required
be
e
to
material high
sidential
in
ofthe portion
escalation)
the (HEU
occupied
avoid
l
there
nuclear
case
Total
e
4 the
order
Fuel
fuel
in
canned
purity .
for
reuse
management
Costs
$117
DOE
production
l
HEU
While
the
T
proposed
LEU
down-blending enriched
by
Po the
approval. savings
costs
Services the
ot
purchasing of
that
is
of
li
Presidential , al
complex
cy
risk New material
the
metal.
in million
annually from
would
from
93
in
subassemblies
weapons
magnitude
and
Direct
the
is
Life
since
Millions ---
assoc
percent
planned
not
of
START
Tritium
timing to
is
composition FY
HEU
Defense
and Extension
i
approximately
cost
v The
in
similar
charges)
.
this
e contained "'97
and
fuel
2015
iat
as
funding
(PPD)
program
is
dismantlement
stockp
mandate,
ed
H to costs
assay
inventories
financial of material
source
percent)
tritium
oxide,
on
EU
and
-
through
·
purchase
with
Table
9
in expenditures
Programs
, (CSAs),
the
Strategic
Programs for
July
(including scope
stream
to
Enriched
il
within
of
e,
and
the
in . materia
" 2019 commercial
a
1
pay
4.
1
estimate will
the
$6 $6 FY
changing and
5,
· DOE/NNSA must
- total
$90
6 the
FY
composite
2 accuracy
are
to
all
The
Cost on
011
· for
-,- Strategic b
becomes
components
2019
is
future. Reserve
million
the
e operations.
ofthe
(LEPs)
Strategic
the
of
Uranium
realized l
diluent
a
Y-12
provided current
for
will
$121 17 $252 $127 2020
Profile
scarce,
$770
FY
REU
indicates
the
commercial with
Option
market.
be
of
oxide-type
.
processing
or
Additional
-r--
i
pits,
Reserve
This
s
degraded
quantity
program.
purchases
projected million
'-
generated
and
to
the
composition
required
for
Management
high-value
$125
2021
Reserve
to
support (CSAs FY
" Therefore,
very
cost
3
Option that ...
REU
other
TVA
Department
.
Table
maintain
The
when
may
market
of
highly
,..----
should
blending/packing
costs
producing down-blending
and
HEU
for and
to
quantities
and 2022 $131 $383
programmatic
over
HEU
processing
shelf-life
4 FY
3
change
resource.
ensure
fabrication
escalated.
composite
shows
of
wou
is
and
the
LEU
enriched
j_
Plan
if
be retained
the
a
the
held
I
I
unobligated
Strategic
ld
of
material
$653
lar
$518 2023 $135 processing,
the
FY
to
an
the HEU
FY
Through
be
due
and
Energy
in
gely
at
lower 2015
The
HEU
components
used
LEU
projected
into
uranium
million
This
pits) -,..-
requires to project.
Strategic both
surve
scrap
offset
capacity
Reserve
VHEU
options
potential
2024 $139 $657
supply
will
to
I
to
fuel,
FY
l
is
-·-,...-
is
evels
2060
October material
Y
ill
storage,
FY
86 is
-
primarily
re-enrich
in
require
12 ance
by
Because
generated
(VHEU),
is J
2020
allowing
percent
costs
Reserve
i
while
and
TVA at should
I of
being s
2025 $113 $770
for
Page
--
FY
Y-12
were 2015
time
and
an
the
a
18 The
stream back CSAs would considered 3 analysis
the conversion Option
with
the Reactor Option produce purpose minimizes material
Some DOE to enc clad mix NR NR
While recover
Aluminum-Clad lost PUREX planned policy INL. disposition It shipped
Idaho.
,
would with
process
fuel
material
umbrance
Strategic
DP
remaining
of
when
and
an currently
and
Future
of
require
restr most
obligations
the material
3 facilities
The
assay
at
5.
to
missions
HEU
this whatever to t
to
was
non-aluminum
be
pits
h
the
Idaho
.
determine
HEU
at non-aluminum-clad
addition
to
i
SRS
be
of
ctions
a
possible
of
returns that to
SNF
from
Reserve luminum
developed
has
are s);
of
a
significant
Idaho aluminum
has
material
received
the
,
93
usable
from
identified
ceased
and
93.15
that
and
is
and
not inventory no
Spent
percent.
and
from
a
a
inventory quantity
listed
the
luminum
of
of sizeable
SRS
National near-term
to
other
Tritium
is
to currently
below
the
-clad DOE-Owned
percent
dismantlement encumbrances. form
aluminum
projected
part
from perform
operations
at
the
reduce
clad
-
based would
Nuclear
processing
clad
under
feasibility
SRS. in
material
Therefore, SNF
contains
of .
594
of
the
Option
-clad inve
of the
inventories
The and
laboratory
SNF.
LEU
the
to
in on
SNF
a use ship
the
Nearly the
would
declaration
PPD-9
a
luminum
Strategic
-
ntory
the shortfalls
meet
clad
quantity
Fuel Enriched
SNF
"swap"
the
National was
in
The
in
594 declaration
(e
backlog
Irradiated
and
(including
the 3
and
recoverable
the
disassembly
.
its
and
g. intent
SNF
and
using
then
use
all
of requirement
There
needed
DP,
aluminum-clad
,
non-aluminum
cost
.
disassembly
current
z
(JNL)
early
-clad spent of
of
At
irconium
leaving Reserve
of
from
disassembly of
and
Naval Uranium
Security
of be
or
the
the
SNF
to
present, for
HEU VHEU
is
NR
Chemical
HEU
bound
.
SNF 1990s
processed
preserve
no
allows
nuclear
Nuclear
SNF foreign
H-Canyon disassembly
Costs
form.
between
HEU.
Reactor
fuel),
the
baseline
used
SNF
is
is in
or
for
(and
would
inventory;
currently
still
Management
to
stored and
the
by
forms Strategic
stainless for
DOE/NNSA
-
tritium SNF
designated
SNF
costs.
in
clad
primarily or
and
access
Processing
thereby foreign
unalloyed
Department
in
Fuel
United
at were
Option Option (NR),
INLand
used
facility
require
scope
CSAs
stocks
current
awaiting
SNF domestic SRS
at
to
As
at
production
the
SRS,
mixed Reserve
decommissioned steel and
access fuel
.
peaceful
currently SRS
and
States
lo carrying noted
of 4
4
located
to
consist
SRS
as
Presidential
HEU
cated
would metal
l
could Plan
Plant
y
some
High
work
(SNF).
clad)
down-blend
is
composite
chem
located
EOS
SNF
of
research
to the
e
can
above,
unalloyed HEU
Through
i
Energy
ther
Assay
and at
be
support
in
and .
use
at peaceful of of
be
to
was
including
in
mate
i
This
cal
only Idaho
the
SRS. adjusted
this
both for
storage
recover
similar
at the
obligations
encumbered
would
not
recovery
drawing
Research
approval.
reactors
r HEU
includes
Idaho
its pits,
I .
process
ial.
material
,
backlog 2060
Hanford
The the
October
aluminum
metal.
containing
further
use i
ntended
additional
to
require
inventory
at which
HEU
to
capability
would
Option
I
SRS
down
are and/or
.
spent
Page
and
These
is Using
was
2015
with
to
at
all
be
a
19 The the
was Canyon, solution estimated approximately LEU Zirconium-Clad covered million encumbrances. In The from unencumbered Nuclear fuel approximate sca restrictions, defuel available;
is process. avoid meet processing A high processed liquid Although reproces and environmental being include
product
still
feasibility
addition
l
available
e.
available
could
evaluated
ZIRCEX
components
finally
-
activity
zirconium-clad
regulatory
or
waiting
developed high
A
subma
estimate
potential s
Energy
to which
by
reduce pilot-scale
s
Proof-of
from
the
ing
however,
be
throughput
-
naval
down-bien?
to
support
level
the would
process
study
there
ly
fission
EU
produced
aluminum-dad
at
rin
the solvent
on
in
$300
is seven th
594
reviews and
is
and
thi
the
es
and
for waste.
SNF
requirements
covered
FY funding.
e
and to Spent
-c
budgetary
researching
potential
be
is
is
s
and
HEU,
tritium surplus oncept
demon
the swapping as products,
2009-2010.
be unobligated
time use
underway million
a
spent
down-blend
to
required Tritium
reloads
the
extraction
substantia
and
envisioned
dissolved
over aircraft
to
make
delivery
of Nuclear
It
minor
unless
naval
by
a
LEU
ZIRCEX
s
naval
cost
hazardou
testing
production
material
l for
tration
(in
so
qualify
or an
the
SNF
of
and
a LEU
the
purify
.
after
provides
addition to
processing
and
carriers programmatic
associated SNF
extended
process
unencumbered
H-Canyon
.
a The
step s
rate
base l
reactor
for
to
at
Fuel
determine
quantity
Enriched Naval
material,
new currently
is for
is
and
agreements waste
the
Idaho
is an
s promising declaration
the
current
recovery total
would
tritium
reagents Environmental
lo
.
hould
or
enrichment
testing over
Z to
In cated. called
SNF an
of
fuel. HEU
IRCE
period
modified
form
cost
the
is
addition
at the
with
of
uranium
a
Uranium
make
would
not
ly
lternate from
the
current
remove
what
SRS
s production.
HEU
X
of
ob
aluminum-clad
Excluding
olution
underway Z
$200
for
s for
project
while
front-end
Implementation
IR operating
with fully and
and
coming
for
the
s
of
s
is
CEX
tacles
the
the
in
waste
would
this
, remove
the facility
of operation
(i.e
about disposal.
ly million
unobligated
therefore
HEU
naval
support disposition the
most Management
generating
Management
ATR
that
to 4.95
SNF contains
is
option
.,
only
and
the years,
meet planned 2 State
management with
Department
be through
de-cladding
36
.
H-Canyon
Early
was one-fourth
s ofthe could movement
the percent,
U) annual If
pent
operating
naval
the
required
tritium
the
ATR (at
positive
an
in
commercial
of
i zirconium
additional
developed
enough
s
analysis
uncertainties
need
path
the a
assist
fuel
subject LEU
transuranic least
unattractive
deci Idaho. to
an
spent
SNF
s
cost
program)
ubstantially
Plan
,
appro
prove
spent
.
requirements
coupled
ex
inventories
s
to
for
to
to
of
between
of
facility
As
a ion results
at
in
reasons
i
to
HEU
sting
suggests
fuel decade).
Through use
the separate
to
comp
Energy
naval
the
cladding the SRS
naval
x
at
was
operate
its
fuel
im fuel
U.S
to
HEU
SNF
.
INL
with
,
recovery and
so Navy
ate that
effectiveness
with
at
for
short-term
the
The
l
made
. ete
spent
produce
cannot because
specificat
SNF
SRS
lower
lvent
policy
the
where
I
ly
available
that
from that
th
fission 2060
, 594
HEU This
Office
October
could
. the
the
low
continues
leaving 62
i
and will
s
laboratory
to
fue
extraction
option
would
volume
additional
MTU
of
$300 SRS
option
from be
I
ZIRCEX
recover
become
it
INL
do
l
of
i
Page
HEU
ons,
to
may
is
the
H
2015
but
the
of
was
be
to
of
20
is the
to removed
has Use s plants Another changes materials
reluctant may
equivalent equivalent Because
of premature recovery reactor tritium Table re-evaluated
Figure
Option Repurposed Option Uran Secu Blend Option Blend Reserve Excess
Option Down-Blend Fuel
pecification
the
post
isotopic
been
of
i
not
r
um
ity
Strategic National
Project
5
NRC
since
off-specification
2 4 3
5
5
-Z
HEU
: produ
:
: :
and summarizes spe
HEU
the
. issue the be shows
Down
Purify Down
IRCEX
successfully
of to
in
The
to quality operating
to
nt
E
Spent
possible
composition the 2005 unobligated
combining
operating
Z
xces
fuel
as
cti
- on-specification
-
IRC fuel estimate
i
and
LEU
s
processing
the
the reactor
on
that
Table
s
EX
use
(Sequoyah
,
processing
derived
and
reactors.
combined
technology
technology
Options s
Available
13
an
license and Material
in
Tritium using
5.
characteristics
.
HEU these
ce schedule LEU off
4
core
exchange
HEU
does HEU
MTU
tritium
the -s
requirements
from
off-specification
in
pecification
.
.
is
2,
for effects
capability
and
Down-Blending At This
donor effect commercial
not LEU
also
3,
matures
is
Reloads
Reactor
Up
suc
Desired
or tritium present, Single
production
and
still
of
Enriched
meet
requires
produced
As
10
to 5
authorized
costs
h
of
and encumbrances in
20
of
spent
in
4,
all a
based
the .
LEU the
production the
and
and
single
receptor for
only
of
Production
nuclear
Determined
by
an
Unknown Extends
Uranium
applicable selected HEU
Tritium
core fuel
ea
the derived
design
places
their from
issues,
2033
Until 2041
quantity
Options
on TVA
increase
to rly
reactor
discussed
from
fuel .
ZIRCEX.
use
stages
potential materials
There un
power
, uses
s
from
only
the
construction,
from ubstantial
-
i Management
this material}
irradlated
s
proces
.
commercial
for
con
in
Moderate
Very
Moderate
off-specification
UIWG Relative
Cost
of
is a Department
the
plants
DOE the
High
Low processed
Likewise,
Unobligated
options long
a
s
development,
impact idered
in such
High
risk
se
to
off
235
considers
-
d
quantities
term
/
uranium. -s
requires
U
that
DOE
pecification
and
content
Moderate-Needs on
concerns arrangement . Moderate-Requires
by appropriations change Requires fuel Al-clad " project Very
recovery development
on
Plan
an given
off
However,
HEU
possibility
TVA
sav
SNF
providing of
tritium
lic
-s
exchange
specifications
High lEU
Through i Energy pecification the
ensing
fuel
ngs
a
with
fuel
the of
may
in it
and/or
in
special of
processes
change with
-
would
Fuel Dismantlement
use its
in
and
in the
l
E
anticipated
ow
production.
LEU
not
fuel ris
x both
Risk
funding
Browns
that a
of that
pensive fuel
I
of
ks should
th
long
fuel
CLWR.
NRC
2060 October
amendment
to
a to
costs
roughput qualify
be
cont ZIRCEX
for
may
"
new off
for
should
- PPD-9
-
.
clean
absorbing
term
and be
Zr would
r
Capital
act I Ferry
two
be
- be
ca
clad
TVA
naval Page
plans
scope
as
,
use offset
for 2015 for and
LEU
of
be
TVA
be
21 Alternate
Some
Although
tritium small reactors Office technology
KEY Office approach inve Exllllng Particle uranium Additional
discus Fuel DOE/NNSA Particle "C Fuol CLWR Fuol
19 Pl
1
Fl&eal
~
R
R
Ructor1
Re
Quarter
Sou &ea P0 JASON Quarter
U
oac
aaot
Futuro
http
·
o
a
.S
S
11l
Op~on
Source
n
ctor
l
.
lor
s our roo
g
Yoa
o
Yu
Departm
blo
://
r tment
r Figure
Fuel
e
modular
a
1 alternatives
2
s oo
2
ss assessment confirmed Panel
www
Record
r
r
ion
production
a
i
on
accelerator
1
and
2 1
Reloa To
Reload fuel,
Energy MOX
REU TVA DBOT USEC
Accelerators
tritium .
2
a 2031
2
17
.
o1s
R l
c e
USEC
Bo
I of Tritium
information
bo
e Budget 3
nt
3
Tritium
to
R
: for
"•aorvoa:
1 1 s. port
d
Bockup
LEU : o
: 411
Det 4l1
Although
is .g
of
Tho
lood
the
LEU II I
"II
Northwu
this
ov of
identify
1 reactors
24
e
Energy, 2
current
,
Combined 2011
research, 2
d
4 2
3 2
rm
JSR
/
0
Iaiit erive
d
Offi pu
11121
32
3 s
Decision
wa
orlvo "•load
that Reload
i
LE
ne
e
-
b
4J1
conclusion
4
include
9 S
in
deliverie
ce
ll necessary
I
I 12
U
d
d
2·
tr
Production REU
techno
t: 1 Supply c
s
:
Roload
production
Re
ate
d "
1
ation/11108.
3 from
2o18 310
report 2 ENW (Cioanout)l4 L
Tritium
1998, 2
2
Tritium
f
033
produced EU
l r the #
'II
oad#
gic
3
om
l opportunities 3
DOE
y
15
, 2
•
on
(SMRs)
Inventory
4]1 t
6
4
"Ac
~
ho
s Will
fue
1 I
produced
down #
,
development,
1
of
Re
Rolo
" in
CLWR
1
Ropurpo a
2o1a
Production Futur particle Effect
c
2
these
E 2
l l
3
2
a
deliver-
e
034 development l
ogies
roaorvu I s
continues
oad 1
ppr
l
and
3 t
3
e
- 1999 Reload#
a
i Reload'"
bl
3
6
mat
rato
(CI
d
411
to
4 and
is
oxi
Energy
e
from
I "II
#
nding
1
..
and
Future
11
25 e ao
still
1 previously
m
of
r 2
2036
Po
2 meet
2
d option
noutJ
0
of Production a
1 Production 436
ate
d 1
is and
tho
20
20
3
Bud ul 3
Re
Reload# l Enriched
Excuo
141 tritium
ternative accelerators
Northwollt
a
Existing
4j1
ly with
<41_1
presented
MTU blo
gas-cooled
LEU l
and MOX valid
I
other I m I
oad
ge
2
Re to
R
ix 0
a
2
2
2036
e
2 Fuol e
2
to
the t
021
MTU
Technology lo
a 1111 of
load#
of
Uran
T
fue
3
3
ry
unoblig reduce
ad echno for
deployment •
27 Fuel
CLWRs, has 3
Fuel
LEU
uc••
411
of
4 monitor
today.
Op l Eff
of
(ENW) L
1 trom I
1116
program
i
was needs
1
Rolood
um
Reload# Tr
in
Uo
e
'
2022
from
2037 producing
2 So
2
Uranium
ct
itium
any lo
been
I
I
advanced
a 1
n
down
TVA
3
Options
s o 3 a
the urc
g
ted Reload
s
Reload
7
4
nd
Technologies
y
below
411
4
tile
extensively
f
I Study #
o reactor
dependence
'
and
fuol a
to
2 1
Alt
(A
N
a
of
other
- 18 •
28
a
blend
contreot
of 2
S
2038 Depleted
2
United
P
bo
o23
commercial
e
s 1
1
T) HEU •1s
Ill
avo 3
rnati
3 these Study
Reload#
"olood hown "
, uaod the
,
" 411
4!1 advanced
,
i
.
R
I
ng
I I
OBOT li January
1
and Management e
a
for Reload v
Reload#
9
tritium •
vision
with
ble
methods 2o24
s e 2039
program
for reactor 2
2 2
Uranium
s
NWS
.
II
3
3
for
18
10
States
18
via
obligatio 29
1
alternatives to
TVA According Department
USEC
411
4
operations.
I
0
11171
199
st
Pr
and
1
TVA
Re
Reload#
,
7
be
2o26
Apri o 2040
3 2
udied on
l
Enrichm
would
duc
2.
I I
oad
MO
was
3
Tritium
development
"•load
R reactor
1
n
e technologies
technically
l
4j1
the a 4
using
i
l
X 2014 oxchangu
ng
of I
lo
II
imited
1
B
20
a
30
2
8
2o26
2041 .ok
T
2
2 d ent
1 the
production
r
I I
9 11
.
.
CLWR 3
i
3
Re
tium
Roload
to Plan require
up
181
8
by
Pro
411
4
l
heavy
to
I
I I
oad
I I
LEU
technologies, 1 most
Production of The
Rolood
a R
10
," 3
oct
202
2042 sources
DOE 2
e 2
support
Au
lo
II Congre
II
3
Through
a
Energy
1
21
a
3
SEIS 4
1
g
4
d
11
2 4 feasib
Congressiona
ust
I
I
#
#
s
1
c
1 water cost-effective
Roload
Re
is
leading
1tJ_Reload
8
2o28
onsiderable
2
in 2
2
043
J
l .
I
I
oad
7
provided
are
3
3
Rolood
,
1
2
TVA
A
of reactor ss
Pollllblo
4
1998
4
l
the
L 1 #
T 'II I e.
1
1
summary
ional
o
F
22
2
32
2060
Reactors 3
unobligated possib
October 202e
"OMN
nuclear
2044
utur
2
2
Bo
,
I 1
#
I 112
The
3
3
such "olood up
Relo
quantity
10
o Ooto
Fuol
411
0 4
I I
1
I
U
1
Reload
Budget
Reload
to
a
3
4
in
r 2
I
d# 2046
2
viability
2 mlned l
Op~on
o3o
l
#
capital e
Page as Budget
3
3
the
23
a
4
33
5 .
411
4
2015
J
"1111 1
1_ I
I
1121 2014
1
a
2o31
of
2046
2
2
~
_
1
1
I
22
3
3
4
4 costs The Advanced of tritium as capital
These produce Program future feasibility, alternatives ne The
fueled heavy cooled, were This
commensurately published alternatives times invest
involve domestic benefit would caused cooled reduce
11 ~ 23
22
Co
Co
1
http target particle D u x
999,
O .s.
t
n n
Tritium
evaluations
so g
E
generation st
://www.c
r
D
for
G
reviewed
essio ~
lid
.
e
, alternatives
pp water
udy
in
4 investment and
be p
production in
a
fast heavy
fabrication
fast 13
by For a capital of
.
t
tritium
rtm 26969- e
a
(APT),
fabrication four
n
.3
d
operator
a
required.
acce
the re new
· found
l lead
scale
R
Reactor
e 4A, financing
b
Bud this
eco
reactors
nt Production
flux
to
o.gov/
s
are
reactor
earch
Tec
o
SMRs
water
get
rd
SMR
263
f
the ler
co
particle was
and time, En
study
of
using
hnolo
technologies
considered to and
reactors;
Office pub
8
erg
that
s higher ator
D
6.
ts
ec were
of CLWR
either
costs
llca
is y
while
is their
for gy
heavily
,
s
i
Technologies
and reactor
sio have
commensurate reduc
"
more r
;
the
risks 1
superior several
tl Tr Tritium
epo
that
R a if
tritium
o
modular
n a
e
i
n
tium
tritium
accelerator
ad
Future CLWR
TVA
for
/1 ,
rt team
evaluated
level
tritium
i , associated
event approach
which
n 11 enlist
, a
molten
Tr "Es a
ed ess it
tenable Pr
costs,
08.
TRL
i
influenced
longer . t
integral
o
ti
can
is
i
um
A
du s
billion
mate
Table
electric
that
and Enriched
production
ssess
of approach
to
not
of Technology
c
production
S
high
ti of the another
may
uppl
extraction
o
be
d
subject
the
fuel
m technology
n
salt
B
9
may
able
Futur
en
ud
development
against
to
y
for
facility,
support
6 installed
-
dollar
indicate
a
Technology pressurized
t
temperature,
getary
with
be
SMR
nd
G
contains
power
usage
reactors
a
e
u
by
providing
i
Recycl
be T to
d
utility
offset
option
ec versus
e,
matter
Ef
as
purchasing
hn the s
Se
continue .
option.
viable
f
. a
Study
ects
technology
and 21
i o
p 1
Uranium ng
.F
of s
an
lo
te
sa
number
in
etc
rom
maturation
.
g
APT's an
mb
owner
;
of
U
y
by
information
another l
increment
that
.S. e a fluoride
is
S
environmental
A
.
e
expert
tud
water l s
Readiness 22
operating
lt
to
the r lead ternative
De
needed increased
e a l
to
y," rn
gas S In
evaluated
p
, tritium
cost fulfill
need
of a
ar
2
. stalling
Was carry t
neutrons
of 0
an
ives
Management tm
time
11 -
Modular
the
s
cooled
and
reactors,
e
domestic
. criter
hin
salt
nt
surveyed
standpoint
f existing
.
or
Department
the
to
s
for
gt
o
A
, , a Accelerator
f P was
and
about production, on infrastructure
Level
-
therefore ro
En proven
costs
construct
SMRs TRL cooled portion
,
duc
tritium
ia risk
erg
possible
O
reactors;
needed
C
,
impacts
reviewed higher
i off-site
y
,
n
,
con
,
Ap
of also s
g
F
full nuclear
mitigation
due
the
Tr e
a
(TRLs)
r to
d
il
,
, 1
iti
process.
era
s wide Plan
2,
of high
the
-
u
idering
production
i
known
make
scale
m
s
20
reactor
l R
to
making
a alternatives of costs
,"
for Production fixed
.
associated
construction 1 eg
the
and
new
4. .
A
alternative
l The
23
Through
i Energy
temperature
ess ,
range based u
reactor
s
t
g
tritium
capital
er
CLWR.
u
tritium
two
1
Higher
s
a
and
Vo technological
t costs.
as
but
facility,
operating
1999
27,
technologies
the natural
l.
SMRs;
6
of
1998 on
most
4
to
fewer mission
I
,
operator
and
N risks,
production
2060 technological
October with
of The
decision to TRLs
would
u
factors such
,
c
Sodium
mb
of
onsider
should
requiring
Tritium
CLWR
viable
uranium
er sodium
operating
enlisting
reactors;
main
units
efficiency
lead
93,
I indicate
in
Page
likely
M
or
that
the
2015
to
ay
.
to
14
a
23
,
a Sodium
Base Integral Advanced CLWR Water Pressurized Reactors Reactor Reactor Reactor Natural feasible Current Fueled, Fluoride in New Molten Reactor Eventual As continues market uncertain, Protection could operation, however, in irradiating licensing,
requiring lead-times,
2022
the
for
Technology
Alternative
Technology
Production
not
early
an
Reactor
.
Salt
fluctuations,
Heavy Fast
Uranium
industry
in
Hi-Temp
With
deployment
alternative
some
and
DOE
be Test
in
the
and
TPBARs
so
Agency
there
Water
2020
earnest.
supported
the
' loading
the
mid-2020s
s
the
reductions
research
-
s
plan
-
availability
are
given
modification
best restrictions,
in
Table
NRC
CLWR,
Westinghouse Tritium TerraPower
Westinghouse,
Transatomics,
100 ATR-General mPower Atomics Holtec, s Temp PRISM,
Enhanced
FHR Heavy
TVA
backup
of
These
reactor
for
case
by
the
SMRs
.
and licensing
6
reactors
licensing
in
either
.
Gas
Design
a
Water
lead-times
factors
schedule
NuSca EBRIII,
of
Evaluation
and
the
plans
,
best
cores
utility
by
s
natural
SMRs
CANDU
Reactors
required
,
number
of
U.S.
Enriched
-c
ARC-
,
.
requirements,
l
and
and
High
e
ase
FFTF, F
with
will
these
and
l
ibe
for
uti
estimates
gas
required
contingency
schedule
6
installation
continue
of
industry
l
unobligated
tritium
ities
of to
options
supply
Advanced
Uranium
<5%
<
93% 10-20
Aluminide oxide TRISO
93% BeF 10 (Heavy 1.8-33%
.
71%
deployed
host
5%
-
will
20%
z-
235
235
435
235
for show
production ZrF4
235
%
estimate
TPBARs,
to
investment
(
coal/fossil
depend
and
238
without
U
U u
U
metai)F
235
of
u
2
solicitations,
235
impact
options
35
Fuel
-
Management U
uox
uo
Uranium
Metal
fuel.
UF
uox
Reactor
U
the
U
reservoirs. (UAix)
demand
initial
U
&
x
TRISO
Metal
4
Salt
Department
),
MOX)
first
SMR
on
is
4
using
The
UF
or
the
,
is
energy
operational
that
but
(UF-
in
many
-
Technologies
uncertain
generation
or
,
current production
timing
SMR
financing
available
no
planning
tritium
In
Plan
factors,
regulation,
good alternatives
terms
development
g-
Production
of
0.48-0.56-
0.40-1.40 of
Tritium
tritium T
Through
.
1.306
"'6.87
/kg-
Energy
capabilities
production
SMR 3.77
TBD
4 TBD
TBD
capital
,
of
reserves
.3
oftritium of
engineering
including
4
SMRs
z3su
costs,
construction
inventory
Environmental
I
costs
2060
October
activities are
I
and
risks,
could
beginning
might
energy
, TRL
to 4-5
4-6
3-5
5-6
still
I
etc
8
7 2
analysis, 7
Page
level
and
.;
begin
2015
and be
24 lV.
NNSA enrichment, EU
HEU Stockpile Weapon Nuclear
Naval
Mutual
HEU Space Reactors Re
Defense Reactors
in
• • • •
•
•
sea
Demand
varying
is
Demand
I
Demand
soto
HEU HEU HEU applications HEU
HEU production High-a
r
Reactors
responsible
Reactors
c
Defense h
s
p
to
to
to in
for
and
e
assays
ssay
support &
fuel maintain
fuel
future
Table
peaceful
LEU
and
naval
research
(
for
and Enrichment
e.g.,
Tritium
7.
(%
NASA
of
(<20
other
>20%
>92% a >92%
>92%
> for >92% the
forms.
Summary
92% reactors;
23SU)
number
prior Mutual
use
percent nuclear
reactors
reactors
research
and restrictions
HEU
to
The
Defense
conversion
of
Enriched
Classified
Classified
of
weapons
(MTU)
235
EU national
Mass
128.3
for
and
Enriched
4.0
2.3 0.9
applications
U)
and
requirements
medical
to
other as
Agreement(
Uranium
fuel
follows:
to
security
stockpile;
Unobligated High
Uranium
research LEU
re
isotope
Requires .
searc
fuel);
Management
missions
are
s
y
y N y N
);
y
h
Department Assay
Demand purposes;
production
shown
reactors
EU
that
in
See Through
See for Does ship
Assumes
assay
and Material through
NASA testing
Pulse-type for
Table
and,
req
Plan
LEU
and
of
a
Classified
medical
Classified
uire
propulsion
new
not
LEU Energy
Through
and
other
7
in
206 2060 a
for
conversion
include
class
by
other reliab
terms
Notes
reactor
isotope
0
space
research
2030
Appendix
I Appendix
of October
2060
need
le
user
allocations
of
nuclear
supply
power
for
mass,
to s
s
I
for
Page
high- C
C
2015
of
25 Nuclear
The consume consequence available As inactive When for scrap inventory HEU. through Naval of
fleet be HEU
FY
Total FY
FY
FY 2A
High-Assay
Research Reactors High-assay
S
m
fo
urplu
NWS
components
2012-FY 2031 2021-FY 2041
noted,
other
ay
Time r
U.S.
o
recovered
plan
th
have
generated
s
HEU
er
ls
Nuclear
-
-
material
intact
a s
u
NWS 2060
Table
n
FY
FY
Weapons
Period
for
ses
any
programs
a
of
would
ub
however,
tional
for
202.0
2060 2030
2040 set b
LEU
HEU LEU ey
re-use
of
additional .
contains
ond
of
units,
s the
8
e Projected
from
from
th
Propulsion
weapons
c
.
during
accelerate
u Demand
requires
na
e
contained
r
Naval
it
ex
weapons
ti
y
Stockpile
within after
o
that
c
r
component
n
ess
e
retired
retired
Tritium
al
qu
>5%to
<
sec the
inv
i
manufacturing
r
20% HEU,
e
Annual
Reactors
any
undergoing
urity
m e
deliveries
refurbishment. significant
ntory
the
e
largest
nt
the
in
program
weapons
n
nuclear
Reactor
s,
new
and ee
. except
li
NWS
nuclear
T
ke
d
h consumption
(MTU)
s.
Requirement
e
and
for
2
eMcess
3 2 2.8
applications
Enriched
HEU
quantities
.
.
. 15
N
6
5
of
or
ava
232
processing
weapons
for
a
material
is
Fuel and
excess
c
to weapon
l R
review
Deliveries operations.
a
identified
t
.
e
minor
egory
4
a
satisfy
c The
NR
to
Uranium
rs.
m
of
of HEU
ea process
reserves,
and
NWS
are Once
of
quantities
components
existing n
and
existing
other
s
naval
that
Through
as
dismantled,
ex
for
allocation
demand
c
purification
ess surplus
th
Management
Total
NR
scrap
e
N
missions
HEU
nuclear
HEU
and
HEU
HEU.
Department
use
disposed
I
ls
s
2060
Requirement
d
exces
working
will
(MTU) or
is
consists ecl
reserves;
128.3 process
are 32
28 43 25.0
a a
the
excess
propulsion
re
and
s
.
.
.
finite support
to
0
0 3
d
t
o
presented
Supports
programs s
urp th
HEU
remove of
Plan
e
commitments.
?
inventories.
l
nuclea
of
u
as
and 4
s. to of
however,
they
t
active
The
h
Through
production
known
Energy
NWS e
r
m
diminish
wea
beyond
impurities nonproliferation
a
in
t recycle
contain
e
pon
r
i
stockpile
needs, Table
al
s
NR
ca
it
I
s
t
2060
n b
October
ock
does
the
i
demand ng
The
e
and
losses
pil
8.
becomes
m
it
e
from
a
current source
d
n
I
is
It
not
units, e
existing
ee
reuse
Page
ava
should
used
d
s
as
2015
il
bu
a
bl
t
a
of
s e
26
till As
to
Spent
would 2005 In advanced naval there were The used
232 product
must operations the The on Mutual
The
each U development atomic systems;
material, The Any nuclear
Security U.S./U supply
1
~
.
U
S./U.K.
a
meet
u
shown
.S.
the
2014
United
presence
United
agreement
quantity and
potential
Department
for
was
party's shut
be
propulsion
are
HEU
negatively
.
uses
K
NR
weapons;
components
its
recovered
Defense
.
other overcome
inventories
2
and,
report
Mutual
components, 3 considerable
allocated in MDA
fuel
down
6
.
demand
fuel
demand
Kingdom
u
States
of
Figure
In
atomic
,
.
of
of
of
schedule,
supply research,
development.
atomic purposes
addition,
E
from are
ne
also
to
these
defense
in
and
affect
Agreement rgy
Defense Agreement
evaluation
and
the
contains 2,
Congress to
class
for
will
through O
weapon
provides
that to
naval
ff
of concluded
Tritium
of up
develop
ice
energy
the isotopes
technical
late naval
and exchange
be
fleet
atomic
i
HEU
development,
and
o
there
as to fied
plans;
f
have
N
United
used nuclear
ava
discussed
160 1980
equipment
unacceptably ,
25
.
details
2060,
design,
for
operations, nuclear
of
l NR
and for
for
Reactors,
are
this
been
weapon
potential training
increases MTU
to
that
s
commitments
challenge
evaluated
the
defense
information
and
Kingdom
Enriched
budgetary
option. assuming
s propulsion
of
upply
reserved
development,
Report
s
propulsion
transfer of
under
uch
(MDA).
have
possible
and
between
s
the
of
to barring
enemy
the
on purposes
any
high
a
s
personnel
design
the
(U.K.)
Uranium the
200 since
tow
associated change
Option
,
no
complexity
of
for
programmatic,
and
MDA plants
The
Enriched
of
concentrations
nuclear
potential
. United
changes MTU
s
ca
significant
the
this
ource, been
NR
the signed
of
material
U
pabilitie .
and
5.
would
demand,
.S./
This
two
military
could
estimates U
Management
in
of
purpo
U
ra
However,
decommissioned
with
Kingdom.
.S./ material
fabrication
n
the
U
HEU
by-product,
iu
in
an
use
and Department
countries . agreement
m
K
be U
s
be
s;
for . projected fleet
technological
se.
employment
agreement
these operations,
.
with MDA
K
declared
of
reactors
development
if and
cost
NO'IOI uneconomical,
.
repro
of
applicable this
MDA
The
high
transfers
these
the undesirable
environmental
Reoclor
enables
of
capability.
and
Plan allocation c
sa
and assay
essed fuel
will
is
objective
.
me
of
excess
reprocessing
referred
Cores,
in the
Through
and
be special Energy
of fabrication
.
changes
in
proces
1958
the ,
requirements.
LEU
of
transfer
down
and
January
met
support
dismantled impractical,
to
isotopes
nuclear
will
and
This United
in
of
for
to
the
defense
nuclear
ses
from
I
obstacles
-
lieu 201
2060 improving
be blended,
October
and
the
as
cooperation
includes
4
NWS
of
facilitie
used
of
and
.
sufficient
the
States
of
delivery
National
EU
non such
the
I
.
HEU
against
Page
reactor
and
in
to
Also
that
2015
and s
as
and
for
,
27 space Since HEU
through associated
A to United These
fabricated process Space convert tested, Program research
While HEU space
would
Defense Many continue metal
Only
in
used
l System Ground FY
FY FY FY
though
high-assay
2018.
2020-2030 2010-2020
2030-2040 2040-2060
for
i
s the
one
to
reactors,
reactor the
reactors
of
(alloyed
Reactor
States required be
and .
applicable
1996
study
Isotope
the (an and
Test start
many This
Reactor
to
defense
timing used
to
with
delivered
exist.
element
same
. match isotope
LEU
provided
demand
reactor
defense-related
of
meta
will
and to
NASA
NASA
research
these
to Fuel
the
of Production
under
supply
reactor,
Reactor Fuel support universally
existing
continue
Table
isotope
the
unique
l
),
nuclear
production
Tritium Space
of Fission
or
activities
will
o through
more
demand
x
nuclear
the
until
reactors
ide, space
9.
require
operated
capabilities
NASA
production
design
Nuclear
DOE/NNSA
to
HEU
Surface
age than
these nitrate,
and
to
and
nuclear
comes require
reactors. 2060,
nonproliferation
is ,
's
all
reactors
Space
in
the
fuel
Enriched
30
considered
considerations
and Research
research reactors
the
System
by
Power
MTU
or
as
United
replacement
Total from
weapon used
HEU
other
reactors
the
Defense
United
Reactor
carbide
provided
The
with
of
Uranium
DOD,
a
fuel
to
are
reactors.
States
U
EU
large Reactor
fuel
variable,
complicated
.
supply Requirement
State
S
effects
Average
form, that
no
until
Fuel
.
Nuc for
policy),
is
Government
by
present
designs
but
longer
currently
on
has
research
s
l
are
DOE
Management
ear
Demand
high
and
material
100 100 140 for
20
a
Each Fuel
and finite
Table
provided
Biennial
5-year
not
Department
Nonproliferation's
conve
's
which
-ass
at for foreign
needed
is
Office
designs
(kgU)
system
related
each supply
operating.
scheduled
9 reactor
space
ay
Through
for
users' rs
represents
schedule
HEU
LEU
ion
EU
of
facility. nations
and
NR
Plan
are must
created
reactors
to
Nuclear for is
fuel
production processes
use
applications
Total
of
and
shut not
defense
more
2060
for
re
Through
The
Energy
through
can be around
have
se
research According
the
a
Requirement
a
down
Reactor
2,300
(kgU) before
1000
standardized arch
evaluated
could 100 500 700 Energy
DOD
fuel
be difficult
best
been
needs
I
designed
the
reactors,
the
.
2060
October
replacement
reactor in
use
1964.
estimates
reactors
.
Conversion
l space.
converted world y,
projection
.
to
and uranium
The
I some
Page
,
The is
2015
,
will fuel
EU
of
28 this High-Assay period
A world The diversion use percent Program, program medical
interests be program as policy The domestic
and assays show Current comes After depend activities
reactors
assay natural current needed. successfu fuel, research Research
change
Because
key
amended,
a
time
of
Nuclear
United current
reliable
production
this
component
that
to fuels
and
HEU
of
above
from
to
uranium
supply 23
on
allocations isotopes
.
.
convert
will
period. of to
this
continu
reactors which
and
and
5
l)
reactor
date, Through
In
the
nuclear U)
uranium
. ,
is
a
States
the
supply
with
plan
Nonproliferation down-blending LEU
In supplier
support
have
reliable
the
as
fuel.
five report
potential
foreign
supply
addition,
process
technical
additional
well
began
s
s
metal
reactors e
the and
DNN
Research
fuel
of percent crap
for
to
convert and
programs
and
high~assay
this Successful
of
metal
Defense in
as
be
supply
remainder of of
Tritium
conduct
designated
a research,
production
HEU
Office
other
in
rates
2060
to as
the
to program,
dom
misuse
these
nuclear
availab
HEU
challenges
1978
from
new
achieve
alloyed
manufacture 23 supp
to
for
USEC
5
.
est
Reactor of HEU
for
U. commercial
not
of
high
Nuclear
and for
This
Act
commitments conversion LEU
various
research
as LEU
high
i
of
the li le
c isotope
Material
this
At
materials
composed
es
contrary
,
to reactors
for Privatization DOE
medical
the -
of
genera HEU,
with
Enriched
the as
replacement assay and
-
present,
of
-
use
fueled
the
assay
material
1978 associated
thi
well
Fuel
Reduced
Nonproliferation's
high-assay
has
desired research
has
10
while
of
s
this
production
desired
and
LEU,
lly
Management
purpose
enrichers
of
as
isotope
that
to
(Pub. HEU percent to
LEU
partnered
research
entered
of
Uranium
begins
uranium
, material
these
isotope
for
and
countries
are
allowing about and
all
Act
assay.
is
are
fuel
Enrichment
activities.
with
schedule
235 L. advanced
expected
uran LEU
consistent very
consistent
production
is 95-242)
of
facilities
U
molybdenum sti
with
,
have
to
into
reactors
half
projected and
production reactors, conversion
assay.
producing
with
ll needed 1996,
is
Management
for
Over
ium
high
high
for
in
that
and to
a
supply
of
test
no
(DNN
r
the
Department will
esearch high-assay
continued blend
research
metal.
reactor
to - directed .
the the
for
as
assay
essentially
Minimization's follow
The
capability
with
While
are with,
reactors.
process
for
increa
require
capability
amended,
'
to
Research
s)
high
next
contracts
this
number
HEU
built. (assuming
fuel
the
be
efforts
LEU
designs
and
nuclear U.S
HEU
-
reactor
that se
Plan
new
decade,
assay
exhausted
operation
LEU
Atomic
above
metal
of
875
(>5
.
to
as
of
eliminates
isotope
national
scrap
using conversion
the
to
and
Through
uranium
of DOE
the enrich
Energy
and
in
percent
kg
LEU that
nonproliferation
Reactor
owners
the minimize
reactors
with
metallic
this
United
as of
Test
conversion Energy
produced agreements has
high-assay
demand
production
may
fuel to
uranium additional by
uranium
secu
enrichment
depleted
I
-
the
an Reactor
to
2060 produce molybdenum
around
October
around
Conversion
States
proves may
use
that
form
Act
rity
<20
ongoing
the
schedu
risk
will
I
in
high
of
over
be
to
civi
will
LEU
.
Page
of
or 2030. for
would
vital
1954,
The
the
2015
li
l
es,
an
29 support
Existing a available established available, is no 10 DOE about approved maintained need required
determination
determined
years.
more
does
s.
1
When
of
MTU
.
than
to Supply
the
research, not
NWS
to
recover
by
of
s
to
maintain
20
the
recover
upply
down
or
nominal
on
be
percent of
supp
NR
the
space, High-Assay
econom scrap
-
of
blending
Tritium
requirements
high
ly
high-assay
a economic
19.75
stockpile of
2
from
35
and
-ass
available
U). i
cal
and
HEU
ay
isotope percent
high-assay
The and
LEU
LEU.
viability
Enriched
LEU
of
that
funding
Department
is
high-assay excess
large
for
production At
enriched
has
present
of
research
LEU
ly
Uranium
been
HEU for
deploying
recovered
fuel
deployment
LEU
material
does
is
,
declared
reactors. high-assay
production
exhausted,
reactor
(uranium
Management
maintain
a
and
capable Department
that
excess
use
of The
reused
LEU
.
it
enriched
an
a could
a
New
uses
suitable
working
recovery
small
to
alternate
scrap
Plan ,
there U.S
capabilities
to
be
of
working
at
supply .
is
Through
extended Energy
national
technology
inventory
being
least
process
is
source
no
fuel
five
inventory process
stored
I
will
2060
October
security
.
eight-to
will
for
i
percent If
s
have
is
recovery
be
made
pending
I
Page
of to
-
2015
but
be
30 V.
Unencumbered restriction research DOE/NNSA unobligated The production under
2020
service accommodate LEU additiona Appropriations
In
this The identify reactor national potential
providing enrichment
21 2 co
6
U
mm
A re
.S
l
t
•
• • • design,
•
• fuel h .
evaluation
2014 s
e s
o D
ponse
rci
u
e
current
and
g
s
p Uranium
a
AC100 h Separation Small
a Atomic E Paducah fuel
l
and
for
l
rtm for
enric
reactor LEU aboratory, lec
l
to
s
evaluation
sufficient
investment
2060
e
has
has
(i.e
size, tromagnetic
nt
fo
LEU
tritium
h to
LEU
in
options produce
compare
me
r r r
o
Centrifuges
policy,
f
. esearc
Centrifuges s naval Section
nt
, identified
En
added
Vapor Act, did
.
upport
power
a
power fuel.
and
fac Gaseous Enrichment
e
r
U
g
ilit
h r
y
of not
and
production
.
,
detail
2015,
S-origin
y were
fuel
E
eact
operation
as
26 this
highly
va
Is
Tritium
Isotopes options
to
Laser
required
312(b)
l
of li
s reactor make
ua
reactor
contractor or
ce With
essed
Enrichment
I
this
HEU
tio
sotope
the
n
enrichment
f
the
u Diffusion
evaluated:
se
an quoted
el
n
d t
enriched
Isotope
of
d facility)
d
need
eventual oes a
the
o
tritium
of Ur and
requirements,
for
Facility
each
pr ba
by
recommendation fuel
could
of fuel a
by
n
o
ni Tit
Separation
o
du
s
closure
u providing
t ht
Laser
in is an
.
Enriched m experts
the
ce
le
ave from
Plant
of
Depending
(e.g
Enrichme
Separation to
Appendix to
hi
unencumbered production
uranium consider
Ill
facility
g
l the
need U.S h
o s
, produce
·
.
Excitation upport
assay
b
,
Division
e
such
of
(PGDP)
4.00
.
to
f
nt
options
ree
Government
uranium
PGDP
Uranium
Technolog L
for
(EM
perform
E research
could
of
U
for a
leveraging
percent
. B,
p
decision on
(AVLIS) Technologies an
eace
facility.
HEU
I
S) program
D, for
DOE/NNSA
,
Naval
(SILEX)
again several
the
enrichment
y
be ful
of
Op
any
enrichment
for
enrichment
use
an
Management
t reactor required
the
need
io
-
-
n r
s
Reactors.
to
Such evaluation making
est
NR 4 s
specifi
t Department
,
commercial
.
and
D
Consolidated
supp a
ri 95
satisfy
RAFT,
c
standard fuel
ti
for
established
o
percent
a
n
high
research
s.
facility
c l
Ap s sometime
y
a
I
on
trat
and
t
option.
capability
r facility
and
27 long-term
was
ii
all
-
2
assay
a in
0
Plan
egy
I
1S
high-assay
n of
path
set
c demand demand
235 December of
without
l
uded
it
reactors
a and
could
that U)
Energy
Through
s
The LEU of
team
between
forward;
needs
i
n
to
to
criteria
supply
th
Further
could
fuel
following
is
provide
support
minimize
factor
for peaceful
s
of
tud
LEU ,
I
2014
for
with
federal
October needs
y
2060 enrichment
,
of b
the
however
eca thus
for
Continuing
EU.
s
,
feed the
tritium
u to
and
se
mid
,
use
I
the
,
no
and
Page
2015
-
for
,
31 The
The AC1
The
tall)
facilities The and
production
1980s.
•
•
• •
•
•
•
following
• •
following
00
gas
AClOO
manufacturing
centrifuge
TRL
for
and Cost-Cost research ranking technology and for Schedule-An durations Potential deployed
Technology Leveraging adapted investment technology Mission policy
risks restrictions
Risk-
The The
immediately
The Centrifuges
centrifuge
worldwide.
the
a
-
component
decontamination centrifuge
TRL of
capital
AClOO
fully
associated
According
The
.
criteria
paragraph
unobligated annual
was
based
Flexibility-
i
to
and
s
for
facility
developed
for
evaluation
se
commercial
evaluation
to
produce
is option. cost
required has
on
Source
done
to
ven Commercialization-
development,
and
development,
proven
Tritium The
were
be
estimate steady-state
on
the
is
increase
b
to
test
with
is
capable
the
to
s
een
a
the
if
on
AC100
estimated s
DOE
use -
viable commercial
ummarize adequate
EU.
utilized
eight
The
ing,
high-assay
and
most by
a the
The
performed
significantly
enrichment
design
of
and
included
scale
and
demand Guide
was
the
the
construction,
evaluation
the
unique
deployed
gas of
evaluation
and
technically
Enriched
production
operating by
providing production separation
U.S
construction,
of made facility
from
centrifuge
to
annual
could
413
each
DOE
1
.
LEU
"capita
be
Government for
a characteristics to
technology
The
updated
.
DOE's
qualitative
of
3
$3.1
technology.
9,
cons technology in were
-
these services for
be
Uranium
4A,
considered
funding the
costs
with
its advanced option enrichments
licen
evaluation
l
of at
" capac
research
facility
from billion
idered
Technology
Gas
evaluation:
cost
high-level
not
the
a
start
sing, to
1
level
of
for
Centrifuge
ity for
that includ
is
Centrus to
to Management analysis EU
incorporate
the
up,
to
and
how
evaluated
assured.
and
and
and technology and
whether
get
meet
of
reactors 235
based
considered $4.8
Department
facility.
is
and
could
balance
U up
nine
ed.
timeline
the s the
used
startup Readiness
reliability
lowe
ituation
enrichment
is
of
to
it
billion
operation
on
s
technology
a
facility
within
Enrichment
the
minimize
The 4
needs
st or
and/or
in
large
as
advancements
.
The
foreign
95
of
.
risk
Plan commercial in
not
showing
of technical
the
if
annual
An
of
percent
plant
early
of
cost
of
Assessment
build
1-2
December
operational,
(approximately
for
option
there
each
s
estimate
Through the
HEU likelihood
Energy
up
to
the
agreements
years
this
of
selected
design,
research
-ou
Plant
to
achieve operating
machine.
the
enrichment
for .
decommissioning
would
and additional
for
t 4.95
material.
. enrichment
were
estimated
I
in
Naval
was program
2014.
2060
future
p October
Guide,
of
technology procurement
r
including
percent
ogrammatic
might
be
through
a
each
started
also
fully
or
cost
40
Reactors
I
Page
U
feet
made
be
.
in
2015
S
.
.
the
9
32
. Small The
being a is Small enrichment
technology, Electromagnetic
scaled stable during EM
unreasonable. EM
centrifuge
possible
•
•
•
IS
IS
• • • • •
•
• sma •
technology
centrifuges is
developed
Centrifuges
isotopes.
The The for would The of in
efforts
the
There The The The The cost approximately
of
deployment Based
The
$150 At
a
ll
the
additional
proven
centrif
additional
the
that a
Manhattan
technology technology
risk
technology technology United capital
TRL
would centrifuge.
for cost
has
billion
long
be is
on
for
production
this
level
the
potential
i
uge
been
s
$112
of for
existing technology
was
are
this
term
approximately
be cost Isotope States
.
$2.5 machine
separation
of
engineering
isotope
option
engineering i
Th
s
Tritium
a
$100
technology. the
developed
four
million
thi
lo
Project. can is
.
viable
would can
i
is
s
million
w
unobligated.
industry for s
est
first has
cost
of
technology.
to based
be
Separation be million
would
separat
SWU design imated
commercialization for
and
developed to
option
more
be used
uranium
doe used
of
A
per
the $195
and
and
seven by unobligated
stab on
n
Enriched
experience,
required s
be
to
ew
to
than
cou
not to
machine,
ion
Oak to
se
the
for
configuration
configuration
$200
a
le
million
produce
produce
EM paration
be
new ld enrichment
and
account is
isotopes.
(EMIS)
long-term
extensive
this
Rid
seven years seven
ser
too
IS $3
million
for
Uranium
ge
could
centrifuge
isotope
.
ve technology
2
.
per
the
small
there
National
domestic
billion
higher
higher
of
as
in
for
year.
60,000
reach
The laboratory the
the
per
and
EU
processes.
processes to technology
the
separator,
is
Management to
to
enrichment
production
long
year conceptual be enrichment
low
centrifuge
recent
ba
The
supporting
bring
Laboratory
nine
$6.8
to
uranium
Department
machines
usable sed
ri
.
term
re
a
sk
TRL
within
billion, . scale
small
on
i
research
s
in
based
developed
potential
.
for
DOE's
the
of .
machine
enrichment,
basis
levels
levels
quantities
would
infra
Plan centrifuges
with
3-4,
one-to-two uranium
and
eventual
on
of
and current
for
str
Through and
the with
Energy
the
the with
for
cost
by
that uctur
a
development
goal
it
original new
annual
enrichment, commercialization
the the
of
the
the
development
approximately
could
t
efforts
is
e. years
o
isotopes.
I
of
United development
currently
2060
sma
development October
a
costs
TRL
separati
operating
take
.
ll
to
I
uranium
of
are
States
Page
deploy
but
When 9.
2015
ng
and
it
33 The the Paducah
SWU
two-reactor option
backfilling Environmental
to might equipment Because additional be 36
Atomic
Several scale method relatively
technology as program funding
p
reasonably restarted
• months • a •
•
plant
• •
• roduce PGDP • •
commercial
per
or
s
This The to Due that
Due
till
This The technology. This changes
The The
5
laser
Vapor from prototype of
is
year
was
percent
restart at
Gaseous
facility
low
be with
delay
ba
technology
the is
technology to failure, to a
the
TRL
existing
restart technology
technology
was
Lawrence tritium
-
large
possible likely
se
shut based
the
the (compared
USE
power
Management
precautions
buffer
EM
d
was
Laser
at
to
suspended,
the
enrichment
in
upon
235
cost,
C. cost,
the down
stockpile
IS
to
a
basis. a of
Diffusion
Paducah, sce
pl
U. a enrichment
lack PDGP
restart
product
However,
costs
Tritium
be
PGDP
ant
gas to nine
Livermore
Isotope
plant
can
nario)
se is
this
th
is
is
due
reconstitute much
in
of unobligated.
lectively .
to
i
These
is unobli no
s
and produce is at The
2013
technology
taken
is
. not replacement
is
the
of decision
and to
. longer attractive program
technology
the Kentucky
and be
a
Plant
a
LEU.
le
Separation
after
much
plant degradation very
high capable
gated.
need ,
methods methods
down-blended.
ss
there
National
time
it
during
Enriched
ionizing
than
was
HEU
commercially
high However, , (PGDP)
years ri
was
more the and
for
s
initiated
,
of
is
k
mainly would
taken produced
of
. 50
but shut endeavor
no
parts, risk plant approximately
probabilities
returned
hold have
operate
This
Laboratory
2 of
producing
35
efficiently
per
Uranium
(AVLIS)
of current
producing
U
research
option
down,
not
off-line
there because
the
equipment
effort cent.
s
decontamination
been
and
hutdown
competitive LEU be
the
promise
with
to
the
.
effort
are and
developed
was commercially
Management
enriched
in
DOE
, by than
from plant
of
the
DOE of
lower
dispersion
s
1973
400,000
very
Department
ign removing with
a
continued
but
its
since
underway.
in
further the successful
of
the if
for began
hi
October
icant high
ha to enriched
major
being
with
g
gas uranium
an
mid-1950s
h
s shutdown, and
develop
and
SWU/year
regres
production
risks
chance es of
development
a the centrifuge.
competitive
gas Plan
able demonstra
i
cap
re
timated
nto
demolition
per
of restart
2014,
s
UF
assays
that
centrifuge
earch
s
ital beyond
Energy Through
s
the ed
AVLIS to
6
onnel.
of
until inventory
expected
i enrich required
the due
and
nve
1990s
failure.
in
one-to-three
rate
and
would
The
.
for
ted
le
facility
stments,
2013
nominally to
I
DOE
of
activities.
With
ss
2060 October
of
development enrichment
uranium
possible
r
this on
AVLIS with
than
ecent
3 's
r
to
.
rate
and
equire
.
a
25M any
When
cannot
I
meet
lab
private
24 Page
it
of
year 2015
The
use
with
to
a
34
s Separation technology
Another
to indefinitely
Laser unobligated United
Observations Provided
section
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
Excitation
The to
There
There underway This development There Additional
higher
States
is There and Due Additional Section commercialized.
There It If three higher AVLIS
The
exorbitantly
potentially
s
-
a est
below
15
123
use
significant
AVLIS
technology developed,
demonstration postponed
to
EM
material of ima
additional
is
is
are
to
development is
and is
assay
to
assay the
ofthe
Isotopes
IS
123 a insufficient
insufficient
high
ted {SILEX).
six
are
produce
possibility technology
high
to
technology
scientific
Australia
scient
proprietary
.
Agreement.
promising
to enrichments.
some develop
high
enr
technology
effort
Atomic
Tritium is
development
technology
be
plans
in is
years current
ichment
ifi
Global
by
capital
unobligated.
part,
3
unobligated
c
of
, . program information
is
and
information
Concerning
this
and
Laser
which
the
the to Global
Energy
was
is undertaken. of
and
nature la
ly
by
not
build
Laser
process
technology
s. development
process
se
and
risk AVLIS
key
considered
developed
and
Enriched
an
r
took
Excitation
-based
a
effort .
Laser
Act
and
operating observations
Australian
viable
a
Enrichment
of
high
material
technology.
commercial
to
Peaceful
development
approximately to
of
this
development
high
Enrichment
is
estimate
enrichment
estimate
1954.
schedule/cost
Uranium
option could
undertaken,
to technology,
prohibited
to schedule/cost
(SILEX)
costs
a
is
company.
reach
Uses
TRL
is
currently
be
resulting
under
SILEX
the
developing
the
.
commercialized
Management
of
had work
of
work
method a
15
capital
5
based
capital
TRL
the
Nuclear
Department
then
- facility
any
risks.
6
years
suspended
Therefore,
considered
would
from and
would
risk
of
TRL
circumstances
possibly
on
or
this is or
nine.
to
could
in
based
is
the Energy
the
the operating
operating
be
the
be move
difficult
Plan
technology
analysis
Separation if
required
No
agreement
its
required of
it take
U.S this
prohibited
s on a
Through
entered Energy
planned
use from significant current
.
experience
anywhere technology
to
This
costs.
costs
due
to
of
determine,
a
to
to
but
produce
TRL
the
I
is
of
to
effort
between
into
produce development
.
2060
produce October
based
a
has
Isotopes
the
options:
proprietary of
from
pursuant
with
two
could
is
recently
I
on
Page
but
the
2015
five
a
by
be
it
35 Another
uranium Other the currently prove chemical the opened fuel 19.75 sources,
Whether reactor
enriched funded Cost have security 1 facility DOE
curr for
8
U
.S.
e
•
• • •
the
commercial ntl
relatively
may
D
cond
Estimate
y a
e
to percent
partment
Sources
b
trained functioning ongoing any The Restart over
if SILEX require process If high option
low
would
e
existing
fuel,
in
with
in
potential
plant
the
on
EU be
EU
ultimately
form
the supplies UF
g
uct
part
veri
meaningful
small
risk
to
unworkable. the efficiency
6
is
is
material
is
making
ed commercial
or
f
high-assay
to
small
ie
be
would
needed based 235 not
of
EM than .
and
d
En through a not
for
among
degradation
centrifuges. of
commercial
enterprise
b
metallic a
e
substantial
centrifuge U. y a
the
located
r
g
de
small supp
LEU
needed
for
y
plant,
a n qualified
a ,
business
prove used
I
C However
ta
n
viable
development
on
require
ast
PGDP
New
Tritium
de
form
decontamination
process
after
il
quantity the
p l
and
y es
a ed
the
e
quantities
LEU
form
nd
t
in source and by
cost-sharing entities
It i
mat
to
e until
AC100
cost
TEN
enrichment
would
option
is nt
28
may
Piketon
2020
AClOO and
NU
demonstration
market; and
DOE personnel
volume
e
could
a s
be
e
,
increasingly the
and
R .
ntity
a
The
given
evi
EX)
estimate
after ub
of
critical too
AClOO
be
for
- ew condition
.
timeline
supplied to and
Enriched have
stantial
Facility
under
EU
of for of
estimate
of
technology
become
,
possible
costly EU
explore
the
Ohio,
Ce however
(60,000
2030,
. a high-assay
before
the
Research,
ntrus
since A
technology
conversion
need
to options
would
and
costs
to
ex major
risky
E be
research and demonstration
for
at
research
of
n
then
i
build Uranium
available
e effort
sting
assumed to their demolition .
rgy
the
SWU/year),
the
2030.
converted
the
,
many of
be
this
cost
in
purchase high-assay with
P
could
effort
ike
LEU AVLIS
plant Development
licensing
site
out
part international facilities to
interest
t
for
on
facility
options strategy
to
reactor
reactor
purchase
research a
F
research
from
Management domestic of
a
the
be
that
would
significant
because
cl// do
was
is
the in
to
ty
implemented
a Department
commercia so
potential
Bu
effort
capable
and
October and in
an
foreign
potential
uranium
shut
and
s
lldo program
has
demonstration
. is
supp be
reactor
AClOO
ut Discussions high-assay
reactor
a
, facility
the
this
uranium agreements.
and
because Sc
significant required
down
high
for
chance
enar
lying
of
government significant
2014. technology
rewards
Plan the
metal
Demonstration
LEU
i
option.
lly o
centrifuge
demand.
risk
converting
s,
institutions
modifications
fuel
of
in
high-assay with
DRAFT
derived
potential
enrichment
there
from of Through
May
Energy
to endeavor
E, LEU, LEU,
should
for
in
limitations
failure
,
cascade
reconstitute
low
of Ja
This
In
a
dispersion
nuar
2013
use
Russia
is
a different
However,
was
any
or
enrichment high-assay
technology
high-assay
actual high y
I
.
option rewards
also
2
2060 as
LEU
October to commercia
01
or due
and
,
found
case,
Cooperative
that
5.
national
along
research
produce (through
efficiency
that
natural
be
C
up
o
cost
turned to
I
s
of
would
t a was
this
Russia Page s
to
to
of
a the
with may
LEU
r 2015
e
data
risk
a
l
36 two approximately Agreement
10
A from variations from oversight Detailed
this maturity options
option DOE approximately manufacturing worth reduce Total
A the addresses detailed minimize T $6.1 could
11.
1104
1504 PB
work
.
second
A
trains
R
tritium
section.
s analyzed
the
DOE/NNSA,
billion
cost
be
,
of
SW
breakdown
. loss
the
286
315
cost,
previously,
using . Two Research
EU U
an
.
option
annual
in
/ for
late-start
Each ,
,
r with
This
510 227
fuel
e first
of
and
additional i
every schedule
oa
The
this
risk, scenarios
a
400,000
personnel
d
DOE
27
and
capability
wide need
Table train scenario
$11.3 DOE
takes
first funding
external
Reloads
option MS months , MS
and
Cum 15
structure
Development,
engineering/procurement
Guide
W
W
up build-out.
and
range
Tritium could
date
U
U months
addresses
and .
billion,
10.
into
schedule
SWU
$1.1
to
represent
expertise
was
is
Centrus.
requests. .U.Uill!!fW
0
0 would
consultants,
413 11
funding before
Tritium to
3 4 3 1
.3
.
estimated
account 3
of begin
billion
per
and
year
2038
.
assessed and
excluding
.
implementing
The
3-21,
0
0
If
. .9
year, estimates near
9
support
funding assumption
construction
s
production
Enriched and .
the
-
profile
Production
and
national It
2041. of
Tritium
the
A Total
Cost
13
1
was
-
.1
term
summary reactor to
requiring
range
Demonstration
for
and
supply
costs
availability
Production be
the
Estimating
assumed
fill
cost were
This and
1
16
project s
were
.
4
build Centrus.
Uranium security
between
of
scenarios
s
tritium
in
of
reloads
estimates
industrial for chain
option
were
Cumulative
could
fW
practical provided
2.
2
approximately
2022 of
8 7
using
.2 -
developed
0
·
out
this
Cumulativ
estimate
the
that
of
ill9 plant developed
disruption
Guide.
2.3 production . 2.8 2.5
begin. Actual
to
$3.1 Management
and
assumes could
uranium
the option
project
scenarios
to
the
minimize
bases
build
were
Department
to
e
ensure fWill§WZ
be
could uranium 2.6
SWU
billion
9
SWU
facility
use for
definition
cost meet
Assuming
producing
is
out or
Requirement adjusted
would
from
1440 a
a
and
estimated 3.5 for 3
11 the
be
.1
requirements
data and
Requirements from
levelized
base
consideration
and
costs tritium
options
would
several
inventory fully
first
is Plan
the centrifuges
3.
3
12 results
$11.3 begin
was . estimated
of
and 4 4 8
case
Centrus'
full
.
s
to
one
three operational
inventory (MSWU)
Remobilization
Through Energy
demand
.fm produce
3. funding to
used,
funding and 13 include project
scenarios
.
using
4 7
immediately 1
billion.
reactor
are
be
options
uranium
are shown
fmill!!flli
own
of
4
15
between
shown
where
configured
.3
.7 to I
data
October
2060
all life fee
and
profile
presented
for
and
take
reload
experience.
by
with 4
s.o available
16
-
which
.6
in this and cycle
and
extend
possible,
in options
2025
I
of
Table
to
Page
to
Table
4.9 5.4
17 DOE
input
the
2015
into
.
in
37 The
Table
plant, requirements range
Other
unencumbered In
-
-
addition
M
TPC
cash 1
ax
st
•
s
L Alt 12. l
any
. .
(Warm/Cold/D
S.
S.
First
Description
Infrastructure Train
Nominal
1,00
Annual
.
Range
High
H:Ch
Cum
Should
Proj
700 900 Years 800
600 400 500 300
200
100
flow
0
C
of Accelerated
Hlah
um
R
ect to
b
e
271.18 the
277.18
169
169
egins
l
,
(no
in oad
of Bud
Accelerated
an
.55
.
funding
St 55
Cash
the
S
[
conversion
a
320 2n.I& SS4.J 4
each
t
sce
operations)
90.53
ge of
enrichment
rt/End
Shipped a
99 produ
ndby
5
e
t
Case
1 U
Flow
nar
681. 271
UI
mob)
1172
Request
.
Tritium
. S
.
48 s
~J 1
8
profile cenario
and .
c
ios
Needs 859
1108 271 20313
Government
tion
and
.2
.
18
6
7
above
697
277 27U
1385
Late
facility
Table
.
. Late
94
18
.
fa and
2 9
preferences,
630
3359 is
271
166
c
Remobilization
~
Start
ility 3
18 4
shown
. Start
5
7 could
I
Enriched
696 U) 3807.4 ll59
11.
that
Accelerated
, .
>6
74
capable
J
decide
yea
Levelized
Levelized
696
4215.6
~S.6
4lJUl
AC100
be can
.2
in
6
r
$3.18
419.75 696 17 46J
in
2016-2025 viable Tab
5
and
. S.
18
Uranium
26
convert
$860M
warm
•
to
s
2022 2023
of
696
16461 44481
Facility
tart
4800
l
1
-
Cash
e
build 26
ri
$4.88 producing
Cash
Ba
12,
s s
696
5144
based
41100
sta
k
0
a
s
.
2G
.
Flow
ft
4 tolerances.
e
high-as
ndby
utilizing
696.26
5840.6
e
an
4800
Management
Case
Cost Flow
0
r
only
on
AClOO
Range
696
651U
4800
Department
0
.
2o
Options
high
Range EU
one
sa
696
11J3
4800
the
0
y
~6
.
product
1
-assa
centrifuge
LEU
6SS
4800 7889
0
high
. Lo
U
for
Levelized
wes
606.119
Plan
8095 4800 and
y
0
AC100
end LEU
of
t
2
S4J
90.18.9 delivery I
4800
0
funding
0
HEU
Through
Energy 8l
38
$6.18-$11
national
of
and
SS2.1l
95916
2016-2038 4800
LEU
0
$900M
Case
Facility
the
UF
2036
2035
55265
1
H 4800
0144
7 profile
0
need
date
6
E
I
cost
gas
U
552
2060
October
Late
HJb96
4
.
800
38 , sec
0
.
11
an
dat
to
to
553.0
estimate
11249
4800
urity
0
Start
e
meet
both
I
2
5
Page
11194
4800
44.24
-
0
2015
"" a
206.J7
1
4800
2000
0
38
12000 14000
10000 8000
4000 600
2000
0
I
1 The and
from assay metal
The and high conversion prior
DOE/NNSA
estimates
Y-12
- was decommi
cost licensed
assay
to an
UF
and
use.
enrichment
s 6
National
for to
above oxide
EU
facility
or
an
container
these
oxide a
o
commercial
. forms
x
ide
ss
.
Security
requirement
Such
ioned
to
facility.
form
Tritium
i
a
to
s
metallic
required
a
enable
in
container Complex
was
entity,
the
An
and
located
s
additional
1990s.
form
s
.
have
hipping
Enriched
The then
(Y
would
; -
12)
not
however,
at la
licensed
s
the
the
t
is
logistical
been
facility
Uranium have
currently
Nuclear
high-assay
estimated
to
Y-12
by
in
be
challenge
the
the
Management
the currently Fuel
designed,
U.S
Department
UF United
only
Services
and
.
6
Department
from
is
U
are
cannot
that
States
.
tested,
S.
an
not
facility
Plan
s
ite
there
enrichment
of
that
included process
in
Through
and
Energy
of
Erwin
that
is
could
Transportation
fabricated
not
can
UF
,
I
in
a Tennessee
2060
facility
convert October
6
designed
the
convert
gas
coming I
by
to
Page
high
2015
a
39 VI.
The Uranium
missions DOE/NNSA's using made through production Congressional to reaffirmed Production and assessment decide The Production CLWR
production through reactor
fuel or Department costs,
support Other naval
around isotope convert approximately HEU
29 3 http {domestic
°
Con
DOE
transition
all
:
/
most
/www Tritium
least
for
.
g
,
r different
of
to
(U
reactors
e
The
SEIS
and
defense
s Conclusion
to
.
s
S until
tritium
2030
production . these ion TVA.
. the
high-assay address .
c
(EU)
De
costly
b pressing
implement
DOE/NNSA's
a
o.g .
excess
some or
the
l
p
options
Future of
Bud
that
a
Readiness
ov Mutual
to
defen
r evaluated
a
.
t foreign)
in
m
tritium /
The
direction,
ge options,
second
publl
Installation
by reactor Department's
missions
e
eight
production. the
option
t
nt varying
stated
low
shortfalls
Offic
HEU
of approximately
ca
study
defense
Technology
s
two
beyond
tlon
e LEU En
and
e
2027,
Defense
to
to
the
e and
report
Tritium
through
producers,
r
/
reactor
inventory .
g
types
Program
11108
tritium
current
-
five
y)
other
moderate
10
above
assays reactor The
research will
these
also
,
two
, "
non-defense
Tr
" assuming
of
years
in
.
mission Estimat
the
i options
tium
eventually By
Department's
as
re Agreement. - new supply
decision
and options
reactor
purchase is
methods production 5 Study
and
-
supply
combining
P current
well
option. Baseline validated
.
e
available ro
percent
set
2060; d
there
reactor
duct
While
scrap
Enriched risks,
Bud
need forms
that
as
aside and
a
i
g
s on
etary
case would
ynopsized
to
second
is
accelerators
related
to
Futu
are require
program
associated
of
recovery
were this
TVA
can limited
production
23
identifies produce is
fuel,
Eff
for to
the
maintain
for
Non-defense
r
can
existing
5
irradiation
following
e
current for
no e
U.
Uranium
T
c
fuel meet
each
be
ec
ts
will
tritium
these
r conclusions
reactor
hnolog
o current tritium.
which be
e
missions
new f
more
-
and
Alt
in
evaluated
using
could
continue
capabilities
maintained
tritium
provide
e
our
baseline
rnativ sources Section
with
expectation y
the
purposes
were
St
sources
currently capability
appropriate
production
is
Management
udy
costly
services
comes
suppliers defense
CLWRs
es
potentially currently
Alternate
nuclear
missions
ff,
require
down-blending
for
Department
R using
evaluated
of
a
evi
to
Produc
Ill
of in
LEU
few
than
s
of
a
io
online
produce could
the ofthis
. through
is
unobligated
irreplaceable
n .
remains
1998
and
HEU
irradiation 0
weapons In
to
projected i
a
with
n and
,
years'
should
met
g
A require
the
review methods
Department's
reliab
accordance
p
Tritium
in
be
r
extend il
non
Plan
in
by Congressional
in
crease
report.
HEU
2
the
TVA
014
by supplied
tritium
of
2038-2041. the
the
worth
the
approximately
,
-
l "
the these
e defen
down-blending
Au
Through
and
Energy
high-assay
stockpile; capability
fuel
supply
option.
to
mid-2020s.
g
services fuel
late
of
the
current,
tritium u
2
until DOE/NNSA
s
9
t
be
comp
producing
of
2
in
sources s with
HEU
The
7
by
supply e 1990s for
,
exhausted
only 2014
1998
unobligated
related I
of
decisions
3
commercial
0
2060
October
tritium
results
l Budget
There production
sources.
purchased
etion to
, and,
Enriched
most
LEU
one
as
Tritium
with
enrich by 2060;
The
and
I
tritium
to
excess
for
of
stable
Page are
Office
are
by
2015
some
the
TVA
for
LEU
and
is
40
, The
the PGDP
capability costs with enrichment a the effect DOE/NNSA's
Naval
standard
United
management
United
significant
for
ive,
closed
Reactors,
the
to and
States set
States
technologies
produce
most in
Office
expe
of
2013
input
Nuclear
c
of will
l
riteria.
advanced
ost
ditious
of
.
efforts
from
unobligated Tritium
eventually
To
the Nuclear
Energy,
meet
that
Sufficient
ability
manner
the
to
technology
and
could
carry
Material
Offices defen
and
to need
EU
.
Enriched
enrich
out
be
detail
se
Environmental
when
to
of
used
and
Integration
these
to
Defense
reestablish
was
uranium
existing support
Uranium non
to
plan
provided
produce
-
defense
Programs,
s
coordinated
using
supplies will
Management
decision-making
an
Management
unrestricted
be
unobligated
to
mission
Department
unrestricted
accomplished
include
Defense
run
the
out.
requirements
.
The
rough
Plan
development
uranium
EU
on
Nuclear
To
technologies of
Department
were
a
Through
that
Energy
in
path
order
the
enrichment
end evaluated
Nonproliferation,
forward.
in
-
most
of-magnitude
I
,
the
2060
of October
six
when
will
this
efficient,
future,
uranium
I
against
ensure
plan
Page
the
2015
41 Appendix Chambellan,
JASON Founds,
Savannah
U.S.
U U
U U.S
U.S
U.S.
U U.S
U.S
.
. .S.
.S.
S S.
.
. .
.
.
104th
95th 83rd 112th
Congressional
Department
Department Department
Department
Department
Panel. Strategic of of Sheet. Review. Paper The
(accessed August
Washington,
Scenarios. 10,
Tritium Tritium
Activities Plan the
Department
U
Nanette
.S
Defense
Congress. Defense
Congress.
River
Congress Congress.
1978.
MITRE
United
Department
,
Curtis,
.
Washington
JSR-92
February
Albuquerque,
.
30,
Albuquerque
Supply
Site.
Budgetary
,
Advisor
From
of U.S November of of
of
of
DRAFT Programs
Programs, A:
Corporation,
1954
States
Budget
U.S.
P.L. P.L. .
- Energy
Energy
Energy. Energy.
Energy
of DC, "Savannah
310, .
P H
Tritium
Department
.
.
and
L.
1945
Energy, R
2012.
.
83 95-242,
Department
References
Group
January
of .
,
104-134 ,
Highly
Accelerator
4310
Washington ,
DC:
-7
Office.
. .
Recycling."
Energy .
Washington
,
"U
Cost Highly Excess
Strategies ,
NM,
03
2012).
through
Office
Office
NM, and http://www
U
.
,
Stockpile S
1996
(ENR)-
January
River
.S
Atomic Nuclear
. Enriched
2012.
Estimate
May
,
Department
.
Estimated
Enriched
February
-
USEC of
Department
Enriched
Uranium
of
of
Not
.
of
September
Energy,
Site
Production
,
14, Stockpile
Stockpile
64
National
to
DC:
Energy,
Energy
DC:
1992. Publi
Privatization
Non-Prolif
Assessment
Meet Uranium Federal
.srs
General
2013
Review
U
Uranium
11,
Congressional
Uranium:
Inventory
Budgetary
.S.
s .gov/general/news/factsheets/tritium
National
hed
of
.
Act
Enriched
National
2013.
of
Materials.
Department Material
Defense
30,
Energy of
Register
,
of
Fact
Energy
e
Production
of
November
Tritium.
ration
1996.
Centrus
Management
Team
Act.
1954
Striking
Managment Nuclear
Sheets."
Effects
s
Consolidated
Authorization
Nuclear Department Uranium
,
.
Washington
93,
Act
March
11
, Historical Draft
Budget
.
1nformational
11
As
Scientific
of
Energy
Tritium
,
May
of
2011. a
Amended.
of Security
Acquisition,
Energy,
SRS
Balance
Tritium
1978
Security
Alternatives
2013.
Demand
Office,
14,
Plan
Plan
,
Tritium
Piketon
Readines
Washington,
of Study,
.
Record
1999 Act DC,
Washington
January
Administration
Program
Through - Energy
-
Administration
August
Washington
Report
Pre
a
for
April
To
and
:
Facilities
Historical
Facility
Mclean
pp.
se
for
of s
FY
Fiscal
Program ntation
Utilization
2015.
26th,
I
Decision
26369-26386.
2060
to
1998
Producing Reference
October
2060
DC:
_e
Congress.
DC,
Buildout
Year
,
Fact
Virginia: srs.pdf
1996.
Report
.
DC
,
- U
to
I Office
Draft. March
.
,
S.
Page ,
2013.
for
Office
the
2015
on
42 U.S U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U U
Y
-
. .
S.
12 S.
.
Department Department
Department
Department
Department General
Department
Government
National
Washington, Department
April
Washington
Reactor
Washington
Government Office, Tritium Cooperation
Space, Washington,
Oak
Ridge,
2,
Accounting
Security
and 1992.
2014.
Requires
Cores.
of
of
of
of
of
of .
Agreement
TN:
Isotope
,
,
Energy. Energy
Energy.
Energy
Energy, of
Energy;.
on
DC: of
DC:
DC:
DC
Tritium
Washington
Energy-
Y
Comp
the
the
,
-12
R&D.
U
U.S
July Office. U
.
.
.
S .
S.
Produ United
Use
Tritium
Triti14m
"Tritium Tritium .
Office .
National
Evaluation
l
Department
Department 3
Department
ex
and
Congressional between
,
s
Not
1958
.
GAO/RCED-92-154
of
Enriched c
tion
Kingdom
, of
Enriched
Atomic
Production Management
Readiness Published,
DC:
Production .
Security Naval
Reactor
the
of U
.
of
S
of
of
Uranium
Uranium
Energy
.
Government Reactors.
of
Uranium
Department
Energy
Energy,
Energy
Report
Complex,
Subprogram
Great
February
Supply
Fuel
Future
Plan
for
,
Supply
, Supply
,
Enrichment -
Consideration
Britain
May
April
Wa
Report , Not
Management
Mutual
-Draft.
Y/UDSP/2012
Technology
April
7,
s
of
Department of
hington
Published 2014.
2015
2013.
and
Plan-
the
Tritium
and Energy,
on
2012.
D
Plan,
United
Demand
. e
Low
Techno
fense Northern
Draft
DC
of
Production
,
Study."
January
Washington
Plan
Enriched -
January
:
Accelerator
008
Genera
States
of
Purpose
Version l
ogy
Analysi
,
Energy
Through
Ireland
As
Washington
Options
2014.
of 25, Amended
l
Uranium
Accounting
s,
Fuel
0
s
America
,
.2.
As for 2013
I
Production DC
for
October
2060
Supply
Plan
Amended
.
:
Research
DRAFT
U
.
for .
.S.
,
,
Analysis,
I
and
DC
Page
Naval
Plan
2015
,
,
of
the
.
,
.
43 This
Appendix
Section Appropriations
76).
Section
Appropriations
(a) Appropriations supply
and (1) uranium
{2) uranium
(3)
a
(b) weapons Section term of
(2)
(1)
report
viable
the
Not an
a
an
The
security
defense
an enriched
a
311
enriched
312(b)
description
costs
cost-benefit
assessment
analysis
House
accounting
needs
later
analysis
was
312
tritium
of
management through
dismantlement
to
Title
of
Bills
developed
train.
purposes,
Act,
(b)
than
uranium,
for
of
uranium
the
Title
of
B:
of
The supplier
Representatives
provided
listed Ill,
of
tritium
2015
planned 2060;
"
Tritium Department
June
the
analysis
of
of
the
Ill,
Division
Department
Congressional
the the
House
for
including below.
(Public
and
Division
plan
30,
Department
in
.
and
national
current
and
by
and
response
national
and
of
2014,
tritium
that
D,
(a}(3)
of
enriched
each
down-blending.
Law
of Enriched
alternative
of
Representatives
D,
a
and
shall
provides
and
Energy the
security
the
preliminary
of
shall to
of
security
113-235)
to
of
Secretary
the
the
future
meet
the
Consolidated
provide
uranium
the
Energy's
include
Uranium
should
Senate
Consolidated
options
-
statutes technologies
demand
defense
purposes
availability
cost a
shall
for
a
the plan
report
and
not
Language
available
detailed Management
national
and
for
and
needs;
Tennessee
Appropriations
submit
later
the
to
through
Department
tritium
to
and
schedule
provide
Congressiona
of which
Senate
the than
estimate
low
dnd
to
security
Further
to
Committees
supply
2060;
-
and
are
the
April
Valley enriched
adequate
a
Plan
estimate
tritium
available
Committees
low
of
of
Continuing
purposes,
30
and
Act,
enriched
Through
l
Authority
Energy
Reports
the
,
and
2015
uranium,
2014
and
amounts
to on near-
highly
to
build
Appropriations
that enriched
I
uranium
including
2060
meet
(Pub.
and
on
October
no
and
highly
enriched
includes:
a
longer
of
national
I
the
long
l.
Page
tritium
113-
for
2015
be
44 House
•
H
DO
.
R
.
MEST
4923
f
fo
fiscal
f
fiscal
recom
support D01nes
Secre s
m
s
e ce
represents of T a s produclion the min bud r
NNSA the available interagency
cos of Domesti
uses
th ava
The the
Fu
U
u
u t
esults
/
uch n
nd
h
a
ockpile
aintenance
nit
rther
lfi
ese r
ntr~
riched
th
e Energy
th
ndb
nd
I
t
def Co
options
ge
il
Gover i
s
ll
NNSA
C
I
NNSA
mum
e
ed
e
p
of
h
able
tary
ed,
fuges
n
year
activ
yea
t
t
m
H
e
House y
Tritium
l
mmitte
o
e
shall
t URANIUM
ee
a
of
request
Sta
th
inves
ic
ns
N
ends
ouse
stockpile
c
while
nt
s
d
t
urani
a
e
upport for
r
u
h suc
active
nm
tra
e
Uranium
and of U
s.
ed
t m
iti
clear
2014
has e
the
20
is
es
U
n
wit eva
purposes
r
provide
reeva
ou
tm
Energy
ani
es.
ee
D
n
funding
en
nit
further
of $96,000,000
h
As
t providing
of
es
14
o
sfer
Enrichmen
the
epartme
, um
minimum Water and
h
d
nt analys
concluded
l
e
t
ed
uated,
R
opera
um R
th
not .
part
nts
s,
and
and th
Acco
domest
The
Weapons
s
ep
e
stewardship
l
e
D The
pr
centrif
au
a
e
S
uation t
Enriched
o
r
Nuclea ENRICHMENT nd E
En
in domestic
e
lat lat
United
and th
ese
esentatives
r
partm
dire
$96.000
th
Co
of
nri
be
must
to
i
t
u
ese
Development
s
e ri
Co
e
es
e
and
nt
n
co
ori
r
thi
nt
a
e
i
mmilf chme
chment
a results t
s
m
c
train
abi
nri th
c u
t r r
E
ustain
mp
than
mm
is
of
f
a
t
a
for
ted
ges e it ve
s
ur
Cor
y,
Counc
be
r nri
ull
e
e
es
ti
in
s
co
S
a
c
analysis,
nt
lit
th
are
ve
aniu
Secre
W
Uranium
proje
national
i
h
L
,
w
timate
tai
v
nt
a
a
c
ee
t
balanced
Domest
000
y
n
national
n
ailable
p
e
infis e
March
a
e
o
co
hi
hm
l
ee
s
d
a
ee
of
o apons
es
nd
n provides
enriched
th active
Office's
is
id
the
and
co
recognizes
nd
ch
r
m ndu
il
e
uranium
ded
a
e
e
notes
d above
l provid it
e
c
E
n
oLher
ary
nt
certifies
ti
ca/
rin
en
t
s
th
availability
th
nrichment
duct
return
th
by
Appropriations
o
c
th
t
a
the
for
o
i
e
e Co
n
ri
1
secu
tsfurthet
to
e
g
c U c
Co
nal
Management a
year
e
, of
secu
the
d
D Senate
c
aga
F
costs
n
rhal
u
20
produce
Senate
May
rporation
e
h
th na
ed
an
d
NNSA
epa
research
und
uncil
uranium sing
cons
ys
D
monstrat
,
raniu
ment
r
p
e
15
Department
on r
Department
t
efense
i
ity
r
i
1 to
2015.
that
ese
ns·t ional
analysis
r
s th
ity
0 budget
rtment
.-
.
oduce
and
2
t
i
investment
approximat
e
th
requirem
maintain
de
that
o Corpo
s
014
r
m E m
capab
a
tr of
fiscal
not
hould
analysis
The
s
f
ve
e
the
ll h
rati
u
ain
LE
security
tirn
,
Com
a
conduc
low
ndi
capab
e
Fund
othe
The
tritium
nri
th
decision
development,
ll
lat
a
has
req
Co
Co
U
th
on
Bill
e
of
r
Plan
at
e
in
ilities
n
co
provide year
atio
c
e
e
for
enric
n
r mill
g
mmitt
r
mmitt Co
hment,
r u
clu
of
th
e
op
of
, ecess
eva
th
n
not
t
of
fo
est
of iliti
priorities
(Fund)
nt echnical
than
2015
ceptualized
t
of
e
e
ose
Energy
n
Through
mmittee
tim anticipa
needs.
th
s
d
s.
r a ees
l
proce
20
Energy
. its
.
lid
y
tockpil
h
e
thr
uti
add
es
that
e
domestic
bo
ee
ed ee
Fundi
ar
$40,000,000
an
a
To
fisca
14
ce
June
ate
triLium
thi
on
li
$3
o
l
on
ll
y
not
o
it
ze
uranium
u
efficiency.
ntr
ha
option
oms-
the Ac
for
ss
e
n
s
d
operations,
gh 4
iona
l
Appropr
represen
viability
y
The d
n
e
,
t
ce
will
and
es
App
l
ve
000,000 tritium
ifuges
I
n
ed
,
sure
1.
2060
t
t
after
requirem
yea
ec
the
g
a Octobe
t
build-out mad
rtifi
plant
o
u
th
l
uth be
a
enrichment
2
for
tritium
Co
hnologies
p
r
n
acquisi
s
co
include
015
a
that
r
opriations
e
end
upp
that
d
ca
t
t
o
n e th
mmirt
2016
I n
o
in
desp
ri
ia
of
t
s
of
Page
.
e
ti
size
The
ider
above
ort
zed
th
r
warm
t
of
o
th
i
th
a
e
2015
o
n
e
t
nts,
nd
s
of
e
it n
ee
ion
e
fo
to
e s
45
r S.R
Procurement
Senate SEC.
.
113-176
309.
Energy
(a)
to
of
DOMESTiC
general discretionary Agreement
Government Mutual
The enr triliwnfrom domestic None congressional to
Secretary
,Sena uranium
Of 3.
4 2.
I
and
accompany
. .
unencumbered
th
the
i
ched
committee
e
Water t
e
of
Department
Tritium
-
$I
Secret01y Department a uranium an
an enriched cos if
Purpose,
provision
the
e
uranium
enrichment 10 cost-benefit
deemed
of nri
assessment
inventory
t
between
funds ,
Development
option
000
the
Energy oft
chme
S.
appropriations
URANIUM
defense
and
directs
2410
he ,
for
Un
000
uranium
dated
of
necessary
for
appropriated that
nt
special of
United
that
Enriched
ited
of
the
defense
,
Energy
submits
of
appropriated
technology
National
Energy only
analysis
the
of
the
co
rescinds
Energy
all
Jul
meets Kingdom.
Un
why
mmitt
purposes
is
Secretary
y
Appropriations
$55,000.000 Sta
unobligated nuclear material
ENRICHMENT
it
for
that
pu ed not 5
to
Uranium
for
may
,
th
le
national
for
of
ees rpo
1958,
Defense
Kingdom
the
s e
th
national
by
sufficient
for
building
such
eac of
current
e
defense be
ses,
no
Such
under this
Appropria
of remaining
America
of
national
h
permits
used
lat.
tritium
activities.
of
Management
including
secur
Energy
enriched
or
shall
Authorization
a
e
security
the and
inventory
r
a
r
to
any
purposes
determination
to
'Weapons
Bill,
than
Department
national
.
ity m
build
options on
-
for
th be
production
Nort
security
tion
balances
other
ee
to
e
2015
requirement:,
the
SeptembeJ'
made
uranium
t
new
tritium
United
The
needs, determine s
defense
h
a
Committees
,· ern
of
Uses
Act
train
sec
available
Activities.
Plan
bilateral
recommenda
available
needs
available
Act
Ir
of
uri
or of
Sta
a
sha
nor
eland
ofAtomic
production
available
of
needs;
Through
determination
th
ty
for
Energy
that
30,
t
if/he
es e
in ll '
centrifuges
.
train
purchase
Fund.
be
Fiscal
agreements;
fiscal to
t
2014
and
I o may of
unobli
until
for
supply
due
obtain
Mutual
th
ti
i
I
s
Energy
2060
to
th
on
domestic e
October
be
Year
year
the
th
e
to
House
the
gated
includes
available directly
e
the
using
en
low
low
by
I
Defense
2015
2015.
ri
Page for
and
th
est
ched
and
2015
e
a
46 Appendix
This
section
C:
can
Tritium
HEU
be
made
and
Supply
avai
Enriched
l
able
to
Uranium
appropriately
and
Management
Demand
Department
cleared
Plan
parties
of
Through
Energy
upon
request
I
2
October
0
60
I
.
Page
2015
47 Appendix
This
section
D:
can
Tritium
be
Tritium
made
and
available
Enriched
Supply
to
Uranium
appropriately
Management
and
Department
cleared
Demand
parties
Plan
of
Through
Energy
upon
request.
I
2060
October
I
Page
2015
48