Arxiv:1902.09735V2 [Hep-Ph] 15 Jun 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Mesons with Beauty and Charm: New Horizons in Spectroscopy Estia J. Eichten∗ and Chris Quiggy Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510 USA (Dated: June 18, 2019) + ¯ The Bc family of (cb) mesons with beauty and charm is of special interest among heavy quarko- + ¯ nium systems. The Bc mesons are intermediate between (cc¯) and (bb) states both in mass and size, so many features of the (c¯b) spectrum can be inferred from what we know of the charmonium and bottomonium systems. The unequal quark masses mean that the dynamics may be richer than a simple interpolation would imply, in part because the charmed quark moves faster in Bc than in the + J= . Close examination of the Bc spectrum can test our understanding of the interactions between heavy quarks and antiquarks and may reveal where approximations break down. Whereas the J= and Υ levels that lie below flavor threshold are metastable with respect to strong decays, the Bc ground state is absolutely stable against strong or electromagnetic decays. Its dominant weak decays arise from ¯b ! cW¯ ?+, c ! sW ?+, and c¯b ! W ?+ transitions, where W ? designates a virtual weak boson. Prominent examples of the first category are quarkonium + + + + transmutations such as Bc ! J= π and Bc ! J= ` ν`, where J= designates the (cc¯) 1S level. The high data rates and extraordinarily capable detectors at the Large Hadron Collider give renewed impetus to the study of mesons with beauty and charm. Motivated by the recent exper- imental searches for the radially excited Bc states, we update the expectations for the low-lying spectrum of the Bc system. We make use of lattice QCD results, a novel treatment of spin split- tings, and an improved quarkonium potential to obtain detailed predictions for masses and decays. We suggest promising modes in which to observe excited states at the LHC. The 3P and 3S states, which lie close to or just above the threshold for strong decays, may provide new insights into the mixing between quarkonium bound states and nearby two-body open-flavor channels. Searches in the B(∗)D(∗) final states could well reveal narrow resonances in the J P = 0−; 1−; and 2+ channels and possibly in the J P = 0+ and 1+ channels at threshold. Looking further ahead, the prospect of very-high-luminosity e+e− colliders capable of producing tera-Z samples raises the possibility of investigating Bc spectroscopy and rare decays in a controlled environment. PACS numbers: 14.40.Lb, 14.40.Nd, 14.40.Pq FERMILAB{PUB{19/075{T I. INTRODUCTION the copious production of b-quarks at Fermilab's Teva- tron Collider and CERN's Large Electron{Positron Col- Although the lowest-lying (c¯b) meson has long been es- lider (LEP), we presented a comprehensive portrait of tablished, the spectrum of excited states is little explored. the spectroscopy of the Bc meson and its long-lived ex- The ATLAS experiment at CERN's Large Hadron Col- cited states [6], based on then-current knowledge of the lider reported the observation of a radially excited B interaction between heavy quarks derived from (cc¯) and c ¯ state [1], but this sighting was not confirmed by the LHCb (bb) bound states, within the framework of nonrelativis- experiment [2]. The unsettled experimental situation and tic quantum mechanics [7]. Surveying four representative P − the large data sets now available for analysis make it potentials, we characterized the mass of the J = 0 timely for us to provide up-to-date theoretical expecta- ground state as M(Bc) ≈ 6258 ± 20 MeV. A small 0 arXiv:1902.09735v2 [hep-ph] 15 Jun 2019 tions for the spectrum and decay patterns of narrow (c¯b) number of Bc candidates appeared in hadronic Z de- states, and for their production in hadron colliders [3]. cays at LEP. The CDF Collaboration observed the de- ± ± New work from the CMS Collaboration [4] shows the cay Bc ! J= ` ν in 1.8-TeVpp ¯ collisions at the Fer- way toward exploiting the potential of (c¯b) spectroscopy. milab Tevatron [8], estimating the mass as M(Bc) ≈ 6400 ± 411 MeV. (The generic lepton ` represents an electron or muon.) Subsequent work by the CDF [9], A. What we know of the Bc mesons D0 [10], and LHCb [11] Collaborations has refined the mass to M(Bc) = 6274:9 ± 0:8 MeV [12], with the most precise determinations coming from fully reconstructed The possibility of a spectrum of narrow Bc states was + first suggested by Eichten and Feinberg [5]. Anticipating final states such as J= π . Investigations based on the spacetime lattice formu- lation of QCD aim to provide ab initio calculations ∗ Electronic mail: [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0003-0532-2300 that incorporate the full dynamical content of the the- y Electronic mail: [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0002-2728-2445 ory of strong interactions. Before the nonleptonic Bc 2 decays had been observed, a first unquenched lattice B. Analyzing the (c¯b) bound states QCD prediction, incorporating 2 + 1 dynamical quark +18 flavors (u=d; s) found M(Bc) = 6304 ± 12−0 MeV [13], The nonrelativistic potential picture, motivated by the where the first error bar represents statistical and sys- asymptotic freedom of QCD [20], gave early insight into tematic uncertainties and the second characterizes heavy- the nature of charmonium and generated a template for quark discretization effects. Calculations incorporating the spectrum of excited states [21]. For more than four 2 + 1 + 1 dynamical quark flavors (u=d; s; c) [14] yield decades, it has served as a reliable guide to quarkonium 1 M(1 S0) = 6278 ± 9 MeV, in impressive agreement with spectroscopy, including the states lying near or just above 1 the measured Bc mass, and predict M(2 S0) = 6894 ± flavor threshold for fission into two heavy-light mesons 19 ± 8 MeV [15]. that are significantly influenced by coupled-channel ef- fects [22, 23]. Three distinct elementary processes contribute to the ¯ ?+ We view the nonrelativistic potential-model treatment decay of Bc: the individual decays b ! cW¯ and c ! sW ?+ of the two heavy constituents, and the an- as a steppingstone, not a final answer, however impressive nihilation c¯b ! W ?+ through a virtual W -boson. Sev- its record of utility. Potential theory does not capture eral examples of the ¯b ! c¯ transition have been ob- the full dynamics of the strong interaction, and while the + + + standard coupled-channel treatment is built on a plausi- served, including the final states J= ` ν`, J= π , J= K , + + − + + − + + + − − + ble physical picture, it is not derived from first principles. J= π π π , J= π K K , J= π π π π π , J= Ds , ?+ + + Moreover, relativistic effects may be more important for J= Ds , and J= π pp¯ ; and (2S)π . A single channel, ¯ 0 + (cb) than for (cc¯). The c-quark moves faster in the Bc me- Bs π , representing the c ! s transition is known. The annihilation mechanism, which would lead to final states son than in the J= , because it must balance the momen- such as τ +ν andppπ ¯ +, has not yet been established. tum of a more massive b-quark. One developing area of τ theoretical research has been to explore methods more ro- The observed lifetime, τ(Bc) = (0:507 ± 0:009) ps [12], is consistent with theoretical expectations [16, 17]. Predic- bust than nonrelativistic quantum mechanics [17, 24, 25]. tions for partial decay rates (or relative branching frac- Nonperturbative calculations on a spacetime lattice in tions) await experimental tests. Some recent theoretical principle embody the full content of QCD. This approach works explore the potential of rare B decays [18]. is yielding increasingly precise predictions for the masses c ¯ ∗0 3 of (cb) levels up through Bc (2 S1) state. It is not yet Until recently, the only evidence reported for a (c¯b) possible to extract reliable signals for higher-lying states excited state was presented by the ATLAS Collabo- from the lattice, so we rely on potential-model methods ration [1] in pp collisions at 7 and 8 TeV, in samples to construct a template for the Bc spectrum through the −1 3 of 4:9 and 19:2 fb . They observed a new state at 4 S1 level. If experiments should uncover systematic de- ± + − ± ± 6842 ± 7 MeV in the M(Bc π π ) − M(Bc ) − 2M(π ) viations from the expectations we present, they may be ± ± mass difference, with Bc detected in the J= π mode. taken as evidence of dynamical features absent from the The mass (527 ± 7 MeV above hM(1S)i) and decay of nonrelativistic potential-model paradigm, including|of this state are broadly in line with expectations for the course|coupling to states above flavor threshold, which ± second s-wave state, Bc (2S). In addition to the non- we neglect our calculations of the spectrum. relativistic potential-model calculations cited above, the In the following xII, we develop the theoretical tools re- HPQCD Collaboration has presented preliminary results quired to compute the (c¯b) spectrum. In earlier work [6], from a lattice calculation using 2 + 1 + 1 dynamical we examined the Cornell Coulomb-plus-linear poten- fermion flavors and highly improved staggered quark cor- tial [22], a power-law potential [26], Richardson's QCD- 1 relators [19]. They report M(2 S0) = 6892 ± 41 MeV, inspired potential [27], and a second QCD-inspired po- which is 576:5 ± 41 MeV above hM(1S)i). This result tential due to Buchmueller and Tye [28], which we took and the NRQCD prediction [14] lie above the ATLAS as our reference model. We used a perturbation-theory report by one and two standard deviations, respectively.