2014 Attendee Companies
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2021 Annual General Meeting and Proxy Statement 2020 Annual Report
2020 Annual Report and Proxyand Statement 2021 Annual General Meeting Meeting General Annual 2021 Transocean Ltd. • 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT • 2020 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT COMPENSATION REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS ABOUT TRANSOCEAN LTD. Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates one of the most versatile offshore drilling fleets in the world. Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in, and operates a fleet of 37 mobile offshore drilling units consisting of 27 ultra-deepwater floaters and 10 harsh environment floaters. In addition, Transocean is constructing two ultra-deepwater drillships. Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RIG. OUR GLOBAL MARKET PRESENCE Ultra-Deepwater 27 Harsh Environment 10 The symbols in the map above represent the company’s global market presence as of the February 12, 2021 Fleet Status Report. ABOUT THE COVER The front cover features two of our crewmembers onboard the Deepwater Conqueror in the Gulf of Mexico and was taken prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, our priorities remain keeping our employees, customers, contractors and their families healthy and safe, and delivering incident-free operations to our customers worldwide. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Any statements included in this Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding future market trends and results of operations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities law. -
Nabors Industries Ltd
ISS PROXY ADVISORY SERVICES ISS QuickScore Meeting Type: Annual Meeting Date: 2 June 2015 GOVERNANCE Nabors Industries Ltd. Record Date: 6 April 2015 Meeting ID: 970579 Key Takeaways New York Stock Exchange: NBR At last year's annual meeting, three directors received WITHHOLD votes from 10 Index: S&P 500 more than 50 percent of votes cast. The board has not sufficiently addressed Sector: Oil & Gas Drilling the issues that led to this outcome. GICS: 10101010 Scores indicate decile Cautionary support for the say-on-pay proposal is advised this year. The rank relative to index Primary Contacts company responded to shareholder feedback following its fourth failed vote or region. A decile Marc Goldstein, JD score of 1 indicates Enver Fitch – ESG Research in 2014, by increasing transparency around short- and long-term incentive lower governance risk, [email protected] while a 10 indicates program goals. Also, the CEO's pay package was at its lowest level since he higher governance risk. assumed that post, consistent with the company's negative TSR for the year. However, questions remain with respect to both transparency and goal rigor under the equity incentive program, which may concern some shareholders and indicate a need for continued close monitoring of the program and related board decisions. In light of the company's weak stock ownership guidelines and history of problematic compensation issues, support is warranted for non-binding shareholder proposals seeking a rigorous stock retention requirement and shareholder approval of specific performance metrics. Support for the shareholder proposal seeking corporate sustainability reporting is warranted, as the information provided in a comprehensive sustainability report would aid shareholders in assessing the company's sustainability performance and its management of related risks and opportunities. -
Matching Gift Companies to the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston
Matching Gift Companies to the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston AbbVie ConocoPhillips Petroleum Co. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company ACE INA Foundation Cooper Industries Nuevo Energy Company Administaff Dell Occidental Petroleum Adobe Deutsche Bank Americas Foundation Ocean Energy Aetna Foundation, Inc. Dominion Foundation Pepsico Foundation AIM Foundation Dow Chemical Company Pfizer Foundation Air Liquide America Corp. Dresser-Rand Phillips 66 Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Duke Energy Foundation/ECO6Q PipeVine, Inc. Albemarle Corporation Dynegy Inc. Procter & Gamble Allstate Foundation ECG Management Consultants Inc. Prospect Capital Management Amerada Hess Corporation Eli Lilly and Company Foundation Prudential American Express Encap Investments LP Rockwell International Corporation American General Corporation Entergy SBC Foundation American International Group Inc. Enterprise Products Shell Oil Company Foundation Ameriprise Financial EP Energy Southdown, Inc. Amica Companies Foundation EOG Resources Southwestern Energy (SWN) Anadarko Petroleum Corp. Equistar Chemicals LP Square D Foundation Anderson Greenwood Equiva Services LLC Teleflex Foundation Anheuser-Busch Foundation Exelon Foundation Tenet Healthcare Foundation Apache Corporation ExxonMobil Foundation Tenneco Apple Inc Fleet Boston Financial Foundation Texaco Inc. Arco Foundation, Inc. Ford Texas Instruments Foundation Arco Steel Inc FMC Technologies, Inc. The Boeing Company ARS National Services, Inc. General Electric The Clorox Company Attachmate General Mills, -
Cooper Cameron Corporation; and M-I, LLC As Follows
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CARDEN SIMCOX, and all others similarly situated; Plaintiff, CASE NO. VS. BP, PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP JURY DEMAND CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP COMPANY NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.; ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP.; MOEX OFFSHORE 2007, LLC; TRANSOCEAN LTD.; TRANSOCEAN, INC.; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC.; TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER, INC.; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION f/k/a COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION; and M-I, LLC, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Carden Simcox, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, brings this class action against Defendants BP, PLC; BP America, Inc.; BP Corporation North America, Inc.; BP Company North America, Inc.; BP Products North America, Inc.; BP Exploration & Production, Inc.; Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; MOEX Offshore 2007, LLC; Transocean Ltd.; Transocean, Inc.; Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.; Transocean Deepwater, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation; and M-I, LLC as follows: Case 3:10-cv-00514 Document-11 Filed 05/25/10 1 of 30 1 879716.1 Page PagelD I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is an owner ofbeachfront property in Panacea, Wakulla County, Florida, on the Gulf of Mexico. She brings this class action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against Defendants for losses and damages arising out of the catastrophic and avoidable oil spill off the Gulf Coast that was caused by the April 20, 2010, explosion and fire aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig ("Deepwater Horizon"), and the subsequent sinking of that rig and the discharge of oil into the surrounding water. -
The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry
The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry Prepared For Prepared By Executive Summary Introduction Despite the current difficulties facing the global economy as a whole and the oil and natural gas industry specifically, the Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry will likely continue to be a major source of energy production, employment, gross domestic product, and government revenues for the United States. Several proposals have been advanced recently which would have a major impact on the industry’s activity levels, and the economic activity supported by the Gulf of Mexico offshore oil and natural gas industry. The proposals vary widely, but for the purpose of this report three scenarios were developed, a scenario based on a continuation of current policies and regulations, a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new offshore leases, and a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new drilling permits approvals in the Gulf of Mexico. Energy and Industrial Advisory Partners (EIAP) was commissioned by the National Ocean Industry Association (NOIA) to develop a report forecasting activity levels, spending, oil and natural gas production, supported employment, GDP, and Government Revenues in these scenarios. The scenarios developed in this report are based solely upon government and other publicly available data and EIAP’s own expertise and analysis. The study also included profiles of NOIA members to demonstrate the diverse group of companies which make up the offshore Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry as well as a list of over 2,400 suppliers to the industry representing all 50 states. -
News from Hiring Source
September 2015 A New Perspective on Crude Prices West Texas Intermediate flirted with $60 a barrel in June, but the commodity is unlikely to return to that neighborhood anytime soon. The world has just too much of the black stuff. The International Energy Agency puts the global surplus at 3.0 million barrels per day, which exceeds the combined daily output from the Eagle Ford (1.5 million barrels) and the Bakken (1.2 million barrels) oil basins. With slower growth expected in China, Iranian crude soon to hit global markets and OPEC’s refusal to cut production, crude will likely remain below $60 for some time. Analysts hoped for a brief downturn. They pointed to the plunging rig count in the spring, forecasted a decline in output by summer, and expected a rebound in prices by fall. In April, a month after WTI averaged $47 on the spot market, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecast crude to hit $55 this month and $70 by February. But the drop in U.S. production never materialized. Production is still 600,000 barrels above June 2014, the month in which WTI peaked at $108 per barrel. WTI now trades in the mid-$40s and the EIA doesn’t expect crude to reach $55 until the middle of next year. The futures market supports the EIA outlook. WTI contracted for December 2015 delivery now trades at $47 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Crude for delivery in December 2016 trades at $52. Weak oil prices have chewed up corporate balance sheets. -
View Annual Report
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. INDUSTRIES NABORS Walk with us 2013 Annual Report Annual 2013 NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. 2013 Annual Report With annual revenues of approximately $6.2 billion, Nabors Industries owns and operates the world’s largest land-based drilling rig fleet and has one of the largest completion and production services fleets in North America. The company is a leading provider of offshore platform workover and drilling rigs in the U.S. and multiple international markets. Nabors provides innovative drilling technology and equipment, directional drilling and comprehensive oilfield services in most of the significant oil and gas markets in the world. INDUSTRY-LEADING MARKET POSITIONS DRILLING & RIG SERVICES # INTERNATIONAL 1 LAND OFFSHORE PLATFORMS ALASKA DRILLING # U.S. LOWER 48 2 LAND DRILLING COMPLETION & PRODUCTION SERVICES # FLUIDS 1 TRANSPORTATION # WORKOVER & 2 WELL SERVICING # COMPLETION 6 HYDRAULIC HORSEPOWER Walk with us A major highlight of 2013 was the successful deployment of Nabors’ revolutionary PACE®-X rig. A step change in pad drilling, the PACE®-X rig features an integrated walking system optimized for drilling multiple wells on a single pad. Representing the culmination of more than 40 years of technical ingenuity, the PACE®-X rig is just one example of Nabors’ dedication to innovating technologies. In the pages that follow, we will walk you through our global operations to demonstrate how we are restoring our financial flexibility, strengthening customer alignment, leading innova- tive solutions and enhancing operational excellence across business lines. 1 Letter to Two years ago, we set out to restore our credibility among Shareholders shareholders by outlining four strategic priorities for enhancing Nabors’ financial strength and flexibility. -
Announced Pay Reductions
Announced Pay Reductions - Pay Reductions are as of April 18, 2020 From Chris Havey, Partner and Ryan McDonough, Consultant, The Woodlands, Texas Meridian is currently tracking announced pay reductions within the oil and gas space. The largest number of reductions to date have been announced in the oilfield services sector. We’re planning on regularly updating this list and re-posting at www.meridiancp.com/insights/energy. Oilfield Services, Exploration and Refining and Storage and Equipment, and Production Marketing Transportation Drilling . Essential Energy . Contango Oil & Gas . Gevo salary/LTI . DCP Midstream cash Services cash reduction incentive compensation reduction 3/31 reduction 4/13 4/16 reduction 4/17 . PBF Energy . Inter Pipeline salary . CES Energy Solutions . Gran Tierra Energy salary/compensation reduction 3/30 salary reduction 4/16 salary reduction 4/16 reduction 3/30 (more . Weatherford . Gear Energy salary details 4/17) International salary reduction 4/16 . Parkland Fuel reduction 4/15 . ConocoPhillips pay Corporation salary . CSI Compressco salary increase cancellation reduction 3/30 reduction 4/13 4/16 . Quintana Energy . Callon Petroleum cash Services salary reduction reduction 4/16 4/13 . Noble Energy salary . Superior Drilling reduction 4/15 Products salary . Lilis Energy salary reduction 4/9 reduction 4/15 . ProPetro salary . PDC Energy pay reduction 4/9 reduction 4/14 . Tetra Technologies . Transatlantic Petroleum salary reduction 4/8 compensation reduction . Smart Sand cash 4/9 reduction/AIP . Kelt Resources salary suspension 4/8 reduction 4/9 . Nuverra Environmental . SM Energy salary/LTI Solutions reduction 4/7 compensation/salary . reductions 4/8 Sandridge Energy salary reduction 4/7 . -
Nabors Industries Annual Report 2021
Nabors Industries Annual Report 2021 Form 10-K (NYSE:NBR) Published: February 24th, 2021 PDF generated by stocklight.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 001-32657 NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Bermuda 98-0363970 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) Crown House Second Floor 4 Par-la-Ville Road Hamilton, HM08 Bermuda N/A (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (441) 292-1510 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common shares, $.05 par value per share NBR New York Stock Exchange Preferred shares, 6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred NBR.PRA Shares, Series A, $.001 par value per share New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:N one. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Y ES ☒ NO ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. -
Halliburton Look to the Future
ENERGYPOINT Customer Satisfaction Update V. 1.1 RESEARCH Halliburton January 17, 2013 SATISFACTION Resilient Through the Ups and Downs RATINGS When EnergyPoint published its first-ever report in 2004, Halliburton was in the midst of a high-profile juggling act of sorts. The company was not only grappling with asbestos-related legal issues inherited as part of its ill- fated Dresser Industries acquisition, its now-jettisoned KBR subsidiary was taking flak, both in the media and in ATTRIBUTES Washington D.C., over a series of inutile contracts with the U.S. military. At the time, we weren't sure if these dual distractions were contributing to the company's then-lackluster oilfield customer satisfaction scores. In Rating Trend retrospect, it appears they were. Halliburton's ratings improved appreciably once the issues were resolved and management was able to more fully concentrate on its mainstay energy-services business. And concentrate it did. The company smartly swore off major acquisitions, choosing to focus on organic growth opportunities TOTAL SATISFACTION AVG STABLE within its existing portfolio. As shale development began to take off domestically, its hydraulic fracturing expertise became increasingly coveted by upstream clients. By mid 2009, after managing through the prerupt decline in global rig count in late 2008 and early 2009, our surveys indicated Halliburton was effectively hitting Job Quality AVG STABLE on all cylinders. Unfortunately, nothing lasts forever. As both demand and expectations grew, customer satisfaction began to decline in 2010. Everything from equipment wear and tear to soaring prices for guar gum Post Sale Support AVG STABLE played a part. -
2011 Annual Report Halliburton 2011 Annual Report Advancing Technology Delivering Results
2011 ANNUAL REPORT HALLIBURTON ADVANCING TECHNOLOGY 2011 ANNUAL REPORT DELIVERING RESULTS 281.871.2699 www.halliburton.com © 2012 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the USA H09007 Halliburton serves the upstream oil and gas industry throughout the life cycle of the reservoir – from locating hydrocarbons and managing geological data, to drilling and Board of Directors Corporate Officers formation evaluation, well construction and completion, and optimizing production David J. Lesar David J. Lesar through the life of the field. Our experience with complex reservoirs that are characterized Chairman of the Board, President Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Executive Officer by increased service intensity, accelerated investments in our people and infrastructure Halliburton Company (2000) Albert O. Cornelison, Jr. to support international growth, and a well-integrated technology strategy will continue Alan M. Bennett Executive Vice President and to set us apart in the industry. Retired President and Chief Executive General Counsel Officer, H&R Block, Inc. (2006) (A) (D) Mark A. McCollum Executive Vice President James R. Boyd and Chief Financial Officer Retired Chairman of the Board, Arch Coal, Inc. Lawrence J. Pope (2006) (A) (B) Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief Human Milton Carroll Resources Officer Chairman of the Board, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. Timothy J. Probert (2006) (B) (D) President, Strategy and Corporate Development Nance K. Dicciani Retired President and Chief Executive Officer, James S. Brown Honeywell International Specialty Materials President, Western Hemisphere (2009) (A) (C) Shareholder Information Joe D. Rainey Murry S. Gerber President, Eastern Hemisphere Shares Listed Retired Chairman and Chief Executive New York Stock Exchange Joseph F. -
Arthur A. Cohen Partner [email protected] Houston | Washington, D.C
Arthur A. Cohen Partner [email protected] Houston | Washington, D.C. | New York +1 202.654.4559 PRACTICES Project Finance and Development, Joint Ventures, Mergers and Acquisitions, Distressed M&A, Finance, Energy, Power and Natural Resources, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), International, Brazil, Cuba, India, Mexico, Corporate, Midstream, Renewable Energy, Traditional Power, Sports Law, Technology Mergers and Acquisitions With more than 25 years of experience, Arthur Cohen represents financial institutions, private equity funds, and project developers on major infrastructure projects throughout the U.S. and around the world. Arthur’s industry focus includes energy, electric power, transportation, sports facilities, and other infrastructure. Over the course of his career, Arthur has worked on all facets of project development, including shareholder and partnership agreements, construction contracts, power and steam sales contracts, operation and maintenance agreements, equity commitments and guarantees, and state support agreements. He has represented lenders, borrowers, purchasers, and sellers in a variety of transactions, including acquisitions and divestitures, financings, and joint ventures and other strategic alliances. Arthur has also represented both developers and lenders in restructuring troubled projects. Clients value Arthur’s knowledgeable advice and leadership on significant transactions, and appreciate his understanding of how to best help them achieve their business goals. Arthur’s abilities in these areas are aided by his prior experience as a managing director at GE Capital, where he developed an efficient, practical approach with a real-world understanding of how businesses work and a sound grasp of financial principles. As co-chair of the firm’s Project Finance and Development Practice Group and chair of the firm’s Joint Ventures Practice Group, Arthur splits his time among the firm’s Washington, D.C., Houston, and New York offices.