DOCSLIB.ORG

Oceanside Vista Interceptor Access Road Project Project-Level Environmental Checklist City of Vista, California August 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oceanside Vista Interceptor Access Road Project Project-Level Environmental Checklist City of Vista, California August 2019 Oceanside Vista Interceptor Access Road Project Project-Level Environmental Checklist City of Vista, California August 2019 Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Vista HDR Engineering, Inc. This page is intentionally blank. Oceanside Vista Interceptor Access Road Project Project-Level Environmental Checklist Contents Section 1. Project Description ....................................................................................................................... 1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................................. 1 Proposed Project ................................................................................................................................. 2 Construction Details ............................................................................................................................ 7 Discretionary Actions and Approvals .................................................................................................. 9 Section 2. Project-Level Environmental Checklist ...................................................................................... 11 Comprehensive Sewer Master Plan Project Information .................................................................. 11 Supplemental Program Environmental Impact Report Tiering Evaluation........................................ 12 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ...................................................................................... 13 Determination .................................................................................................................................... 13 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ................................................................................................ 14 Aesthetics ................................................................................................................... 16 Agricultural Resources ............................................................................................... 18 Air Quality ................................................................................................................... 21 Biological Resources .................................................................................................. 25 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................... 35 Geology and Soils ...................................................................................................... 37 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...................................................................................... 42 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................. 44 Hydrology and Water Quality ..................................................................................... 49 Land Use and Planning .............................................................................................. 55 Mineral Resources ..................................................................................................... 57 Noise .......................................................................................................................... 58 Population and Housing ............................................................................................. 61 Public Services ........................................................................................................... 63 Recreation .................................................................................................................. 65 Transportation/Traffic ................................................................................................. 66 Utilities and Service Systems ..................................................................................... 69 Energy ........................................................................................................................ 73 Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................... 74 Wildfire ....................................................................................................................... 76 Mandatory Findings of Significance ........................................................................... 78 References ........................................................................................................................................ 82 Tables Table 1. Contributing Drainage Flows ........................................................................................................... 7 Table 2. Proposed Temporary Construction Easements .............................................................................. 8 Table 3. Proposed Permanent Easements ................................................................................................... 9 Table 4. Vegetation Impacts – Access Road Backbone and Options ........................................................ 29 Table 5. Vegetation Impacts – Staging Areas1 ........................................................................................... 31 Table 6. Jurisdictional Impacts - Access Road Backbone, Options, and Staging Areas1 .......................... 33 August 2019 | i Oceanside Vista Interceptor Access Road Project Project-Level Environmental Checklist Figures Figure 1. Regional Map ................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Project Area ................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3. SPEIR Study Area Map (Adapted from Figure 3-2 of the SPEIR) ................................................. 5 Figure 4. Proposed Access Road ................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 5. Contributing Drainages ................................................................................................................ 10 Appendix Appendix A. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Appendix B. Biological Resources Letter Appendix C. Cultural Resources Letter ii | August 2019 Oceanside Vista Interceptor Access Road Project Project-Level Environmental Checklist Section 1. Project Description Background In November 2017, the City of Vista (City) certified the Supplemental Program Environmental Impact Report (SPEIR) for the 2017 Comprehensive Sewer Master Plan (2017 CSMP) (State Clearinghouse No. 2007091072). The 2017 CSMP identifies a set of recommended projects for inclusion in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and an operations and maintenance (O&M) Program. The SPEIR included a programmatic evaluation of the potential environmental impacts of the projects and associated O&M Program, as contemplated in the CSMP. The O&M Program component of the 2017 CSMP provides a continuation of the City’s existing condition assessment program consistent with the City’s adopted Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP). The City maintains multiple easements to facilitate access to the conveyance and pumping facilities within and outside its service area. These easements range from 10 to 20 feet in width to accommodate maintenance equipment. The SPEIR for the 2017 CSMP included an environmental analysis for the O&M Program activities, which includes repair, upgrade, and/or rehabilitation of existing unpaved access roads that provide access to the City’s trunk sewers. The City’s existing Oceanside-Vista, Reach 1, (OV1) trunk sewer line was constructed in 1989 and is located in the central portion of the City’s service area in unincorporated San Diego County. OV1 consists of a 12-inch sewer line and is located within a narrow easement across multiple private properties with limited or no access. The City needs to develop improved sewer maintenance access to OV1 through the securing of multiple permanent easements and reconstruction of the existing access road. The activities required to repair, upgrade, and/or rehabilitate access roads, including OV1, are similar in nature to the description of O&M activities considered and analyzed in the City’s SPEIR. For this reason, the City is proposing to add OV1 to the list of improvements identified in the City’s O&M Program and CSMP. This document evaluates whether the improvements identified for OV1 are covered within the scope of the SPEIR analysis and supporting mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP). Project Goals and Objectives The City’s goal for implementing the proposed project is to obtain the requirement easements to provide all weather access to the manholes for OV1, including during the 50-year storm event. The proposed project would improve sewer maintenance access by providing the City’s O&M staff with reliable and safe access to the OV1 trunk sewer line via a dedicated easement. Improved and reliable access during large rainfall events is required for the City to clean and maintain the trunk sewer line consistent with the SSMP to minimize the potential for sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) . Implementation of the project would support compliance with the City’s SSMP in accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Pala Park Habitat Assessment
    Pala Park Bank Stabilization Project: Geotechnical Exploration TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ATTACHMENTS Biological Report Summary Report (Attachment E-3) Level of Significance Checklist (Attachment E-4) Biological Resources Map (Attachment E-5) Site Photographs (Attachment E-6) SECTION 2.0 HABITAT ASSESSMENT General Site Information ............................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 4 Special Status Resources ............................................................................................................. 8 Other Issues ................................................................................................................................ 14 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 14 References .................................................................................................................................. 16 LIST OF TABLES Page 1 Special Status Plant Species Known to Occur in the Vicinity of the Survey Area ........... 10 2 Chaparral Sand-Verbena Populations Observed in the Survey Area ............................. 12 3 Paniculate Tarplant
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report
    APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore EIR BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORE PROJECT CITY OF OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: EnviroApplications, Inc. 2831 Camino del Rio South, Suite 214 San Diego, California 92108 Contact: Megan Hill 619-291-3636 Prepared by: 4629 Cass Street, #192 San Diego, California 92109 Contact: Melissa Busby 858-334-9507 September 29, 2020 Revised March 23, 2021 Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 6 1.1 Proposed Project Location .................................................................................... 6 1.2 Proposed Project Description ............................................................................... 6 SECTION 2.0 – METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS ............................................ 8 2.1 Background Research .......................................................................................... 8 2.2 General Biological Resources Survey .................................................................. 8 2.3 Jurisdictional Delineation ...................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction .................................................... 9 2.3.2 Regional Water Quality
    [Show full text]
  • Ceanothus Crassifolius Torrey NRCS CODE: Family: Rhamnaceae (CECR) Order: Rhamnales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida
    I. SPECIES Ceanothus crassifolius Torrey NRCS CODE: Family: Rhamnaceae (CECR) Order: Rhamnales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Lower right: Ripening fruits, two already dehisced. Lower center: Longitudinal channeling in stems of old specimen, typical of obligate seeding Ceanothus (>25 yr since last fire). Note dark hypanthium in center of white flowers. Photos by A. Montalvo. A. Subspecific taxa 1. C. crassifolius Torr. var. crassifolius 2. C. crassifolius Torr. var. planus Abrams (there is no NRCS code for this taxon) B. Synonyms 1. C. verrucosus Nuttal var. crassifolius K. Brandegee (Munz & Keck 1968; Burge et al. 2013) 2. C. crassifolius (in part, USDA PLANTS 2019) C. Common name 1. hoaryleaf ceanothus, sometimes called thickleaf ceanothus or thickleaf wild lilac (Painter 2016) 2. same as above; flat-leaf hoary ceanothus and flat-leaf snowball ceanothus are applied to other taxa (Painter 2016) D. Taxonomic relationships Ceanothus is a diverse genus with over 50 taxa that cluster in to two subgenera. C. crassifolius has long been recognized as part of the Cerastes group of Ceanothus based on morphology, life-history, and crossing studies (McMinn 1939a, Nobs 1963). In phylogenetic analyses based on RNA and chloroplast DNA, Hardig et al. (2000) found C. crassifolius clustered into the Cerastes group and in each analysis shared a clade with C. ophiochilus. In molecular and morphological analyses, Burge et al. (2011) also found C. crassifolius clustered into Cerastes. Cerastes included over 20 taxa and numerous subtaxa in both studies. Eight Cerastes taxa occur in southern California (see I. E. Related taxa in region). E. Related taxa in region In southern California, the related Cerastes taxa include: C.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Understanding The
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Understanding the Effects of Floral Density on Flower Visitation Rates and Species Composition of Flower Visitors A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology by Carla Jean Essenberg June 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. John T. Rotenberry, Chairperson Dr. Kurt E. Anderson Dr. Richard A. Redak Copyright by Carla Jean Essenberg 2012 The Dissertation of Carla Jean Essenberg is approved: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I thank my advisor, John Rotenberry, and my committee members Kurt Anderson and Rick Redak for advice provided throughout the development and writing of my dissertation. I am grateful to Sarah Schmits, Jennifer Howard, Matthew Poonamallee, Emily Bergmann, and Susan Bury for their assistance in collecting field data. Margaret Essenberg, Nick Waser, and five anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on individual chapters of this dissertation. I also thank Paul Aigner, Doug Yanega, the Univ. of California-Riverside Biology Department Lab Prep staff, Dmitry Maslov, Barbara Walter, Morris and Gina Maduro, Ed Platzer, Rhett Woerly, and the Univ. of Califorina- Riverside Entomology Research Museum for providing advice, equipment, and/or assistance with logistical challenges encountered during data collection. All field data were collected at the UC-Davis Donald and Sylvia McLaughlin Natural Reserve. The work was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, a Mildred E. Mathias Graduate Student Research Grant from the Univ. of California Natural Reserve System, and funding from the University of California- Riverside. The material in Chapter 1 was accepted for publication in the American Naturalist on March 26, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Terr–3 Special-Status Plant Populations
    TERR–3 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT POPULATIONS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During 2001 and 2002, the review of existing information, agency consultation, vegetation community mapping, and focused special-status plant surveys were completed. Based on California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2001a), CDFG’s Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFG 2003), USDA-FS Regional Forester’s List of Sensitive Plant and Animal Species for Region 5 (USDA-FS 1998), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species List (USFWS 2003), and Sierra National Forest (SNF) Sensitive Plant List (Clines 2002), there were 100 special-status plant species initially identified as potentially occurring within the Study Area. Known occurrences of these species were mapped. Vegetation communities were evaluated to locate areas that could potentially support special-status plant species. Each community was determined to have the potential to support at least one special-status plant species. During the spring and summer of 2002, special-status plant surveys were conducted. For each special-status plant species or population identified, a CNDDB form was completed, and photographs were taken. The locations were mapped and incorporated into a confidential GIS database. Vascular plant species observed during surveys were recorded. No state or federally listed special-status plant species were identified during special- status plant surveys. Seven special-status plant species, totaling 60 populations, were identified during surveys. There were 22 populations of Mono Hot Springs evening-primrose (Camissonia sierrae ssp. alticola) identified. Two populations are located near Mammoth Pool, one at Bear Forebay, and the rest are in the Florence Lake area.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List
    Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Abronia turbinata Torr. ex S. Consortium of California Turbinate Sand-verbena A/PH Nyctaginaceae 2 Watson Herbaria Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (E.A. McGregor) Consortium of California Abrams' Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 1B.2 4-5 Reveal [synonym: Oxytheca Herbaria parishii var. abramsii] Acanthoscyphus parishii Consortium of California Parish Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 4.2 1 (Parry) Small var. parishii Herbaria Acmispon glaber var. Consortium of California brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet Short Deerweed PH Fabaceae 1 Herbaria Acmispon heermannii Heermann Lotus or Consortium of California (Durand & Hilg.) Brouillet var. PH Fabaceae 4 Hosackia Herbaria heermannii Acmispon heermannii var. Roundleaf Heermann Consortium of California PH Fabaceae 1 orbicularis (A. Gray) Brouillet Lotus or Hosackia Herbaria Acmispon junceus (Bentham) Consortium of California Rush Hosackia AH Fabaceae 2 Brouillet var. junceus Herbaria 1 Locally Important Plant List- Dec. 2018 Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Acmispon micranthus (Torrey Consortium of California Grab Hosackia or Lotus AH Fabaceae 3 & A. Gray) Brouillet Herbaria Acmispon parviflorus Consortium of California Tiny Lotus AH Fabaceae 2 (Bentham) D.D. Sokoloff Herbaria Consortium of California Agrostis hallii Vasey Hall's Bentgrass PG Poaceae 1 Herbaria Common or Broadleaf Consortium of California Alisma plantago-aquaticum L. PH Alismataceae 4 Water-plantain Herbaria Consortium of California Allium amplectens Torrey Narrowleaf Onion PG Alliaceae 1 Herbaria Allium denticulatum (Traub) Consortium of California Dentate Fringed Onion PG Alliaceae 1 D.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS in the 1830S
    SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds James Lightner San Diego Flora San Diego, California 2013 SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s Preface The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and Our knowledge of the natural environment of the San Diego region H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds in the first half of the 19th century is understandably vague. Referenc- es in historical sources are limited and anecdotal. As prosperity peaked Copyright © 2013 James Lightner around 1830, probably no more than 200 inhabitants in the region could read and write. At most one or two were trained in natural sciences or All rights reserved medicine. The best insights we have into the landscape come from nar- No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form ratives of travelers and the periodic reports of the missions’ lands. They without permission in writing from the publisher. provide some idea of the extent of agriculture and the general vegeta- tion covering surrounding land. ISBN: 978-0-9749981-4-5 The stories of the visits of United Kingdom naturalists who came in Library of Congress Control Number: 2013907489 the 1830s illuminate the subject. They were educated men who came to the territory intentionally to examine the flora. They took notes and col- Cover photograph: lected specimens as botanists do today. Reviewing their contributions Matilija Poppy (Romneya trichocalyx), Barrett Lake, San Diego County now, we can imagine what they saw as they discovered plants we know.
    [Show full text]
  • Alkali Milk-Vetch)
    Glenn Counties (California Natural Diversity Data Base 2001 and unprocessed data). Five occurrences are afforded some protection by virtue of their location on public land, but no particular conservation efforts have been undertaken in those areas. 2. ASTRAGALUS TENER VAR. TENER (ALKALI MILK-VETCH) a. Description and Taxonomy Taxonomy.—Alkali milk-vetch is in the pea family Fabaceae. Gray (1864) named Astragalus tener, commonly known as alkali milk-vetch. He gave the type locality only as “California ... from near Monterey or San Francisco” (Gray 1864:206). No varieties were named until Barneby (1950) reduced Astragalus titi, commonly known as coastal dunes milk-vetch, from a full species to the variety Astragalus tener var. titi. In so doing, the combination Astragalus tener var. tener was created automatically to represent Gray’s original material (i.e., alkali milk-vetch), according to accepted rules of botanical nomenclature. Another common name by which this variety is known is slender rattle-weed (Abrams 1944). Description and Identification.—Astragalus tener var. tener (Figure II-22) is similar in most respects to A. tener var. ferrisiae. However, the two taxa differ in leaflet shape and fruit morphology. Astragalus tener var. tener leaflets vary, even on the same plant, from narrow and pointed to wedge-shaped with blunt or notched tips. In A. tener var. tener, the pod is only 1 to 2.5 centimeters (0.4 to 1.0 inch) long and straight or only slightly curved. The base of the pod is typically rounded; if stalk-like, the base is much less than 3 millimeters (0.12 inch) long.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad Nacional Del Centro Del Peru
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL CENTRO DEL PERU FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS FORESTALES Y DEL AMBIENTE "COMPOSICIÓN FLORÍSTICA Y ESTADO DE CONSERVACIÓN DE LOS BOSQUES DE Kageneckia lanceolata Ruiz & Pav. Y Escallonia myrtilloides L.f. EN LA RESERVA PAISAJÍSTICA NOR YAUYOS COCHAS" TESIS PARA OPTAR EL TÍTULO PROFESIONAL DE INGENIERO FORESTAL Y AMBIENTAL Bach. CARLOS MICHEL ROMERO CARBAJAL Bach. DELY LUZ RAMOS POCOMUCHA HUANCAYO – JUNÍN – PERÚ JULIO – 2009 A mis padres Florencio Ramos y Leonarda Pocomucha, por su constante apoyo y guía en mi carrera profesional. DELY A mi familia Héctor Romero, Eva Carbajal y Milton R.C., por su ejemplo de voluntad, afecto y amistad. CARLOS ÍNDICE AGRADECIMIENTOS .................................................................................. i RESUMEN .................................................................................................. ii I. INTRODUCCIÓN ........................................................................... 1 II. REVISIÓN BIBLIOGRÁFICA ........................................................... 3 2.1. Bosques Andinos ........................................................................ 3 2.2. Formación Vegetal ...................................................................... 7 2.3. Composición Florística ................................................................ 8 2.4. Indicadores de Diversidad ......................................................... 10 2.5. Biología de la Conservación...................................................... 12 2.6. Estado de Conservación
    [Show full text]