EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha

April 25, 2015 Earthquake and Aftershocks Performance of Cultural Heritage Structures

Suraj Shrestha Senior Engineer/ Urban Planner Dharan Sub-Metropolitan City Office

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

EERI Briefing Series of Videos

 Introduction: Objectives, methodology, unique features, team – Bret Lizundia  Nepal Earthquake: Geography, demographics, and general damage – Surya Shrestha  Seismology and Ground Motion – Kishor Jaiswal  Building Performance Part I: Building type overview, RC frame with masonry infill, and woodframe – Hemant Kaushik  Building Performance Part II: URM bearing wall, postearthquake safety evaluation, barricades/shoring, school retrofits – Bret Lizundia  Health Facility Performance – Judy Mitrani-Reiser and Hari Kumar  Social, Psychological and Cultural Factors – Courtney Welton-Mitchell  Geosciences – Jan Kupec  Emergency Response – Ganesh Kumar Jimee  Performance of Cultural Heritage Structures – Suraj Shrestha  Building Codes – John Bevington  Lifelines – Rachel Davidson  Resilience and Community Case Studies – Chris Poland  Summary of Findings – Bret Lizundia

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Traditional Town Planning of Ktm Valley

EERI / Suraj Shrestha Pulchowk Sankhamul

EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Swotha

Source: www.chinabuddhismencyclopedia.com Dharma Chakra EERI / Suraj Shrestha Case of Patan •Main streets in 2 cardinal EERI / Suraj Shrestha directions bounded by 4 Imadol Mounds-Dharma Chakra layout Lagankhel •Durbar Square-Central part

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Traditional Town Planning of Ktm Valley

Elements of Urban Planning (Case of Patan) EERI / Suraj Shrestha •Paths and Nodes-Main, secondary streets and funerary roads •Districts-Residential neighborhoods, e.g. Machindra Baha •Edges-Private residential squares, e.g. Nagh Baha •Landmarks-all nodes, districts and edges have temples or

Swotha Narayan Temple at Swotha Node

EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Machindra Baha Nagh Baha Bhinche Baha

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Overview of Nepal’s Heritage Sites

 Every Nepalese village has its shrine, and in , temples are central to community life.  Prof. Madhab Gautam (TU) - “Kathmandu is a city for which the cultural sites are part of its skeleton. If you take them away, the city collapses.” (source: www.theguardian.com)  Nepal’s World Heritage Sites  Cultural • : 7 Monument Zones-Kathmandu, Bhaktapur, Patan Durbar Square, of Pashupatinath and Changu Narayan and Buddhist of Swayambhu and (1979) • : the Birthplace of Lord Buddha (1997)  Natural • (1984) • (1979)

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Typologies Of Heritage Structures

1. Traditional brick masonry with timber frame structures

Source: M.Shakya, H. Varum, R. Vicente & A. Costa “Structural Vulnerability of Nepalese Pagoda Temples”

Base Stone

EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Beam, Bracket & Column

Plank & Batten EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha Kathmandu DS Wedges EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Typologies Of Heritage Structures

2. Brick masonry structures in lime or mud mortar (Bhimsen Tower – “Vajra” made up of brick dust, lime, black lentils and caramel)

EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha Kathmandu DS Kathmandu DS Source: www.en.wikipedia.org

Bhimsen Tower- Source: www.rediff.com Before and After Kal Mochan Temple Earthquake in Tripureshwor Source: www.mashable.com

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Typologies Of Heritage Structures

3. Made from stone

Source: Prof. S.R. Tiwari/ Temples of Nepal Valley

Source: www.cctv-america.com Vatshala Devi Temple of Bhaktapur DS-Total

EERI / Suraj Shrestha collapse Krishna Temple Section of in Patan DS Krishna Temple

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Architecture Of Heritage Structures

Source: Prof. S.R.Tiwari/ Temples  Tiered/Pagoda style of Nepal Valley  Stupa/ style  Shikhara style

Tiered/Pagoda Stupa Shikhara

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Extent Of Impact

 In famous Durbar Squares, damage is less than some media reports imply.  Still, scale is huge: Nearly 750 monuments damaged, with approximately half collapsed  Kathmandu Valley World Heritage Sites: Out of 7 Monument Zones, 5 suffered damage

EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha Bhaktapur DS Patan DS Kathmandu DS

Changu Swayambhu Narayan Temple Source: honeyguideapps.com EERI / Suraj Shrestha

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Extent of Impact

 Post Disaster Need Assessment (Government of Nepal, 2015)  Cultural Heritage Total Disaster Effects: NRs. 19,223 million (US $193 million) • Damage: NRs. 16,910 million (US $170 million) • Losses: NRs. 2,313 million (US $23 million)  Cultural Heritage Total Needs: NRs. 20,553 million (US $206 million) • Cultural Heritage accounts for 3.1% of US $6.7 billion total needs for all sectors.

Source: sikkanet.com Source: www.cnn.com Damaged Kathmandu DS A Buddha Statue covered in debris in Bhaktapur DS

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Damage Patterns

 Performance of monuments varies

Source: www.un.org Source: www.kathmandulivinglabs.org EERI / Bret Lizundia Chyasilin Mandap in Bhaktapur DS- Patan DS-Before and After Earthquake seismically strengthened and undamaged

Source: EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha www.artbynatashajade.wordpress.com Similar Temples- Anantapur Temple (Superstructure collapsed) and Pratappur Kathmandu DS-Before and After Earthquake Temple (Plinth damage) of Swayambhu

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Damage Patterns

 Brick masonry with timber frame structures performed better than massive brick masonry structures in lime or mud mortar  Tall structures on narrow bases collapsed  Compression & shear failure of masonry on corners and walls at the base thus narrowing the base, tipping over the structure and leading to collapse  Low amplitude ground motion in the short period range is less damaging to low rise masonry buildings.

EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha A temple in Kathmandu DS Low rise temples in Kathmandu DS EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Damage Patterns

 Top level of some tiered temples collapsed probably due to top heaviness

EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Source: Shashank Shrestha/ ventzine.co EERI / Suraj Shrestha Taleju Temple in Nine storey palace Patan DS in Kathmandu DS JayaBageshwori Temple at Gaushala

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Damage Patterns

 Some examples of pounding observed

EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Palace premises near Nasal EERI / Suraj Shrestha Chowk in Kathmandu DS

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Good Performance

 Restored monuments performed well

EERI / Suraj Shrestha 55 Windows Palace in Bhaktapur DS

EERI / Suraj Shrestha Bhimsen Temple in Patan DS EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Good Performance

 Most of the Tiered temples with wide plinth base performed well despite some examples of bad performances.

EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Taleju Bhawani temple in Kathmandu DS EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Source: www.retro-blogging.blogspot.com Nyatapola in Bhaktapur DS- Complete collapse of Maju Dega built in 1702 survived Great Temple in Kathmandu DS- EQs of 1833, 1934 & 2015 Before and After Earthwuake

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Good Performance

 Stupas performed relatively well, perhaps due to their dome shapes

Source: explorehimalaya.com Source: twiggietruth.wordpress.com Boudhanath Stupa after EERI / Suraj Shrestha Swayambhu Stupa- Other April 12 and May 25 EQ monuments collapsed, but main stupa still stands.

A small stupa near Swayambhu EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Good Performance

 Pashupati Nath Temple  It isn't very tall, so it may have been less affected by long period ground motion.  Timber frame structure/wooden wedges connect the parts.  Lighter weight at the top and heavier at the bottom.  Has been renovated many times because of its

importance and revenue generation capacity EERI / Suraj Shrestha  Bottom copper and golden roof is wide Pashupati Nath enough to prevent rain and sunlight from Temple making direct impact on wooden structures of the temple frame, thus minimizing deterioration of the temple.

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Reasons for Failure

 Quality of materials and construction (wooden wedges vs nails, brick quality)  Poor maintenance and deterioration (e.g. rotted wood, loose capitals): Repeatedly reported as a cause of damage  But is this the only reason?  Possible other reasons  Failure of joints  Inadequate seismic features (like stiffness, strength)

EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha Poor quality of bricks in a neo-classical Rotted timber taken out from a heritage structure in Kathmandu DS collapsed temple in Kathmandu DS EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Possible Reasons for Failure of Walls

Source: Prof. S.R. Tiwari/ Temples of Nepal Valley  De-lamination of the multi- layered walls  Bulging of the stiffer face brick shell  Soft story at ground floor level

Source: Matthias Beckh Typical Wall-section EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Possible Other Reasons for Failure

 Age of the building

Source: www.en.wikipedia.org Source: shailendrabangshi.blogspot.com

Char Narayan Temple in Patan DS built on 1565 AD- Before and After Earthquake

EERI / Suraj Shrestha EERI / Suraj Shrestha Kasthamandap in Kathmandu DS built out of a single Sal tree in early 16th century. M0st timber is from that period.

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Possible Other Reasons for Failure

 Topography effect (hilltop vs base)  Geological condition (water table, thickness of lake sediment, proximity of bedrock to the surface) Source: albinger.me

EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Source: www.konviktion.wordpress.com

Taumadhi square in Bhaktapur suffered less damage probably due to soil nature

Hilltop Effect on Swayambhu EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Issues in Rebuilding

 Key question: Rebuild with traditional techniques and materials or include some form of enhancement?  Positive side  Plenty of available artists/ masons  Guthi: Community based management

EERI / Suraj Shrestha

Source:www.en.wikipedia.org Mr. Amrit Man Buddhacharya, a member of An artist involved in wood Swayambhu Management and Conservation carving Committee EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Issues In Rebuilding

 DOA staff size to manage the scale (1 Architect, 13 Engineers, 12 Archeologists, 3 Sub-Engineers, 4 Lower level supervisors)  Lack of proper documentation and record of art and artifacts/ Lack of drawings (both architectural and structural) of monuments  Reaching consensus on plans on how to rebuild • Expert advice desired but how to reach consensus?  Funding issues • Foreign donors and agencies pledged more than $3 billion in aid in a donor conference held in Kathmandu on June 25, 2015 but its proper utilization should be ensured  Technological issues

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Recommendations

 Pilot study vs. large program  Repair guidelines (Norms/ Standards) needed  Material testing warranted for Quality assurance  Strong motion instruments would help improve understanding of behavior  Analytical modeling recommended  Shake table testing of repair, retrofit solutions  Research studies on underlying reasons of good and bad performance of monuments needed to verify effectiveness of local traditional technology and materials

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

References

● Tiwari, S.R. , “Temples of the Nepal Valley,” Himal Books, Kathmandu, 1989 ● Wolfgang Korn, “The Traditional Architecture of the Kathmandu Valley”, Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Kathmandu, Nepal, 1989 ● Matthias Beckh, 2006, “Traditional Construction Techniques of the Newars at the Itum Baha Monastery in Kathmandu” , Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Construction History, Exeter 2006 ● M.Shakya, H. Varum, R. Vicente and A. Costa, 2012,“Structural Vulnerability of Nepalese Pagoda Temples,” 15th WCEE, World Conference on Earthquake Engineering ● Bijaya Jaishi, Wei-Xin Ren, Zhou-Hong Zong and Prem Nath Maskey, 2003, “Dynamic Analysis of Old Multi-Tiered Temples in Nepal” IMAC, XXI, “A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics” ● Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission, “Nepal Earthquake 2015: Post-Disaster Needs Assessment: Executive Summary (PDNA),” Kathmandu ● “How did survive the Great Earthquake of Nepal?”, 2015 (online), www.honeyguideapps.com

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

More Information: Reports, Data & Photos http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/2015-04-25-nepal/

 Visit EERI’s Virtual Clearinghouse Website for:  Geolocated Data Map  Photo Gallery  Team Report (available in late summer 2015)  Reports from other teams & organizations  Curated Topic Posts  Thanks to my Virtual Team Collaborator, Camilla Favaretti, who uploaded my photos to the EERI map

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks

Acknowledgements

 I would like to thank the following individuals and organizations who supported my reconnaissance effort:  EERI’s Learning from Earthquakes Program for travel and logistic support  NSET for coordination, logistics, and linkages to local individuals and organizations in Nepal  Dharan Sub-Metropolitan City Office for granting me the leave to participate in the team  EERI LFE Team Members for the discussion and intellectual stimulation during the visit that enhanced my thinking and findings  Prof. Dr. S.R. Tiwari, Prof. P.N. Maskey for sharing their views  Ram Gopal Shrestha from Bhaktapur Municipality, Rohit Ranjitkar from KV Preservation Trust, Sampat Ghimire & Devendra Bhattarai from DOA, Amrit Man Buddhacharya from Swayambhu Management and Conservation Committee for guiding the tour to the damaged sites  Bret Lizundia for reviewing the content

EERI LFE Briefing for the April 25, 2015 Nepal Earthquake and Aftershocks