DOCSLIB.ORG

BELAY DEVICE HANDBOOK Climbing Can Be a Fun and Safe Experience – but Only If You Use the Right Belay Device

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BELAY DEVICE HANDBOOK Climbing Can Be a Fun and Safe Experience – but Only If You Use the Right Belay Device BELAY DEVICE HANDBOOK Climbing can be a fun and safe experience – but only if you use the right belay device. Nowadays there is a wide variety of different devices on the market. They all have their particular advantages and disadvantages. We’ve written this EDELRID handbook to share our expertise and provide important information about how to use the different types of devices available. We look at all the main belay techniques and give valuable tips for using and looking after belay devices. At EDELRID, we’re constantly working to further optimise climbing safety and develop new and innovative belay devices. As such, this handbook also provides an insight into our development process and our quality assurance. Made by climbers for climbers. The EDELRID team is made up of passionate climbers and alpinists. In addition, we work closely with professional climbers and mountain guides. We understand the demands that climbers place on their equipment. CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY is our credo – we apply it to our belay devices to make versatile products that meet and exceed the highest quality standards. We have over 150 years of experience in mountain sports. This combination of experience and passion constantly drives us to explore new paths and only accept maximum performance. Furthermore, as a mountain sports company, we naturally make environmental protection, sustainability and quality management our highest priorities. EDELRID 88316 Isny im Allgäu Germany Tel. +49 (0) 7562 981 - 0 Fax +49 (0) 7562 981 - 100 [email protected] www.edelrid.de CONTENT 4 I A history of belay devices 6 I Modern belay devices 8 I Manual belay devices 14 I Semi-automatic belay devices 16 I HMS - No belay device required 18 I OHM - Assisted-braking resistor 22 I Which belay device do I need? 24 I Better belaying 30 I The birth of a new belay device 32 I Norms and standards 36 I Index ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION Typesetting: Text: Miriam Heberle, Jan Hoffmann Jan Hoffmann, Sebastian Straub, James Heath Photography: Proofreading: Christian Pfanzelt photography, James Heath, Tim Carruthers, Sally Maßmann Jan Hoffmann A HISTORY OF BELAY DEVICES Climbing has a long tradition. Since time immemorial, adventurous men and women been fascinated by mountains and sum- mits all over the world. However, their equipment often left a lot to be desired. Thankfully, today there is a wide variety of technical belay and abseil devices. But how did they come into existence? We’d like to briefly outline the development of belay devices and their function. Early ascents involved scaling steep cliffs with just a rope for protection. No other equipment was used. Around 100 years ago, Hans Dülfer, a German mountaineer, invented the Dülfersitz (literally ‘Dülfer seat’), which allowed the climber to abseil (aka rappel) from exposed sections and belay a partner. Eng- lish-speaking climbers refer to this as a classic abseil. To abseil using the Dül- fersitz, the doubled rope is passed through the legs and wrapped around the body. This produces friction between the rope and your body, braking the rope. Please note: heat is generated, which may result in a friction burn. It’s recom- mended that you wear robust, sturdy clothing, for example a good old pair of Lederhosen, should you happen to own a pair. On longer or faster abseils, enough friction is produced to burn through normal clothing. Nevertheless, the classic Dülfersitz was the standard means of abseiling, until climbers started using carabiners. So, we’ve learnt that wrapping the rope around something increases friction and braking when abseiling and belaying and also allows the climber to vary the amount of friction used. Therefore both belaying and abseiling could be carried out in a more controlled manner. Friction can also be generated by wrapping a rope around a carabiner. This is significantly easier to handle than wrapping the rope around your body, as required in the Dülfersitz technique. To create more friction, it’s possible to join a number of carabiners together in a chain and wind the rope through them. Earlier climbers attempted to refine this technique by running the rope through two carabiners. The resultant lever action produced by using two carabiners significantly increases friction. Alternatively, one or more carabiners could be placed crosswise across a main carabiner and the rope was then fed through, as shown in the diagram. This is known as the carabiner brake method. This technique provided the inspiration for the first dedicated abseil and braking devices. The first braking devices were carabiners with an integrated braking crosspiece in the middle. The doubled rope was run through the carabiner over the braking element. These braking devices offered poor handling. As a result, this techni- que was generally only used to lower heavy loads or climbers as part of a moun- tain rescue operation. 4 www.edelrid.de Better handling performance was required to allow normal climbers to belay and lower. Two solutions were introduced at the end of the 1960s: the Italian hitch (also known as the Munter hitch, after the Swiss climber Werner Munter) and the Sticht plate. For an Italian hitch all you need is a certified, pear-shaped HMS (German: HMS – Halbmastwurfsicherung) locking carabiner. The hitch works by crea- ting friction from several bends in the rope. It’s a very useful technique and is still used to this day – more on the Italian hitch later. In 1967, Fritz Sticht invented the first mechanical rope brake that is widely regarded as the direct predecessor of today’s tubular belay devices. It con- sists of a flat steel or aluminium disc with two parallel slots. Depending on whether you were using single rope, half ropes or twin ropes, one or two bights of rope were passed through the slots and then clipped to the harness with a carabiner. You still occasionally see the Sticht plate in use today. Its main drawback compared to modern tubular belay devices is its jerky action when lowering. Photo: www.storrick.cnc.net 5 MODERN BELAY DEVICES Nowadays, anyone wanting to buy a new device will be overwhelmed by the different options available in their local climbing shop. What’s the difference between them? Allow us to shed some light on the matter. Modern belay devices are divided into two categories: manual braking devices (EN 15151-2) and braking devices with manually assisted locking (EN 15151-1) – according to the rather complicated wording of European standards. So what does it all mean? Manual belay devices This first group covers tubular devices (“tubers”) and figure-of-eight devices in all their many shapes and sizes. These dynamic devices will hold a fall, but only if the belayer acts appropriately. All these devices do is increase the braking force/hand bra- king force. If the belayer lets go of the dead rope (the braking side) then the lead climber’s fall will not be arrested. The European standard (EN) 15151-2 has existed since 2012. It defines the test values, safety requirements and test methods for these manual braking devices. However, manufacturers are entitled to decide whether to test their products according to this standard or another one. All our manual belay devices are tested according to this standard and meet the corresponding requirements. Auto-locking tubular devices (manual devices with assisted braking), the latest development of tubular belay devices also mostly fall into this category. They have a significantly greater safety reserves than standard tube devices, but are not classed as “braking devices with manually assisted locking” (EN 15151-1). 6 www.edelrid.de Belay devices with manually assisted locking The second group covers ‘semi-automatic’ or ‘auto- locking’ belay devices, such as the EDELRID Eddy. These devices contain an assisted braking mecha- nism that ‘automatically’ stops the rope moving, eit- her when the rope receives a sudden, sharp tug or when manually activated, when it blocks completely and arrests the fall. The braking action is indepen- dent from the belayer’s hand braking force. However, similar to a seat belt in a car, these devices will not block a rope if it is pulled through slowly. For this reason, one hand should always be kept firmly on the braking side of the rope. HMS-Belay As we mentioned earlier in the history section, you can also belay without a belay device by using an Italian hitch. All belay devices have one thing in common. The increased braking force of the device makes it possible to hold a fall. However there are major differences in how to use them, their mechanical action and how dynamically they brake a fall. Let‘s take a closer look at all the different types of belay devices. 7 MANUAL BELAY DEVICES Tubular belay devices Tubular belay devices are by far the most widely the braking rope is held above the belay device, in used type of belay device. All EDELRID tube belay the event of a fall the belayer will have virtually no devices comply with the safety requirements of the chance of holding the rope and will no longer be able European standard 15151-2. They are in essence a to prevent a ground fall... modern version of the original Sticht plate. This is The main advantage of tubular belay devices is their why many climbers still refer to them as a ‘belay dynamic braking action. They allow a small amount plate’. They create braking force through a double of rope to pass through the device before a fall is bend in the rope. The rope is bent around the HMS completely arrested. So with a little practise, tubular carabiner and around the device itself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2. the Climbing Gym Industry and Oslo Klatresenter As
    Norwegian School of Economics Bergen, Spring 2021 Valuation of Oslo Klatresenter AS A fundamental analysis of a Norwegian climbing gym company Kristoffer Arne Adolfsen Supervisor: Tommy Stamland Master thesis, Economics and Business Administration, Financial Economics NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS This thesis was written as a part of the Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration at NHH. Please note that neither the institution nor the examiners are responsible − through the approval of this thesis − for the theories and methods used, or results and conclusions drawn in this work. 2 Abstract The main goal of this master thesis is to estimate the intrinsic value of one share in Oslo Klatresenter AS as of the 2nd of May 2021. The fundamental valuation technique of adjusted present value was selected as the preferred valuation method. In addition, a relative valuation was performed to supplement the primary fundamental valuation. This thesis found that the climbing gym market in Oslo is likely to enjoy a significant growth rate in the coming years, with a forecasted compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in sales volume of 6,76% from 2019 to 2033. From there, the market growth rate is assumed to have reached a steady-state of 3,50%. The period, however, starts with a reduced market size in 2020 and an expected low growth rate from 2020 to 2021 because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on this and an assumed new competing climbing gym opening at the beginning of 2026, OKS AS revenue is forecasted to grow with a CAGR of 4,60% from 2019 to 2033.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Accident on Air Guitar
    Analysis of the accident on Air Guitar The Safety Committee of the Swedish Climbing Association Draft 2004-05-30 Preface The Swedish Climbing Association (SKF) Safety Committee’s overall purpose is to reduce the number of incidents and accidents in connection to climbing and associated activities, as well as to increase and spread the knowledge of related risks. The fatal accident on the route Air Guitar involved four failed pieces of protection and two experienced climbers. Such unusual circumstances ring a warning bell, calling for an especially careful investigation. The Safety Committee asked the American Alpine Club to perform a preliminary investigation, which was financed by a company formerly owned by one of the climbers. Using the report from the preliminary investigation together with additional material, the Safety Committee has analyzed the accident. The details and results of the analysis are published in this report. There is a large amount of relevant material, and it is impossible to include all of it in this report. The Safety Committee has been forced to select what has been judged to be the most relevant material. Additionally, the remoteness of the accident site, and the difficulty of analyzing the equipment have complicated the analysis. The causes of the accident can never be “proven” with certainty. This report is not the final word on the accident, and the conclusions may need to be changed if new information appears. However, we do believe we have been able to gather sufficient evidence in order to attempt an
    [Show full text]
  • Climbing and Rappelling: Safety Activity Checkpoints
    Climbing and Rappelling: Safety Activity Checkpoints Girls (except for Girl Scout Daisies) may participate in three types of climbing: Bouldering: Climbing without a rope but at a height not greater than 6 feet off the ground. Spotters (participants who safeguard the movements of a member of the group) provide support and protect the head and upper body of a climber in case of a fall. Spotting is used on descending and ascending high elements or climbing routes and bouldering. Top roping: A climbing method in which the climb is anchored from the top of the climbing route, using belays (safety ropes to secure a person to an anchor point). The belayer (person who controls belay/safety line to prevent long and dangerous falls) may be set up at the top or the bottom of the route. Multi‐pitch climbing: For experienced climbers only; a climb on a long route that requires several pitches the length of a rope or less (a “pitch” is the rope‐length between belay stations). The climbing group climbs to the top of the first pitch. The lead climber climbs the next pitch, anchors in, and belays each remaining climber individually to the anchor. Rappelling is a means of descending by sliding down a rope. The rope runs through a mechanical device, and a safety belay is used in all rappelling activities. Rappelling is not recommended for Girl Scout Daisies and Brownies. Know where to climb and rappel. Climbing and rappelling may be done on indoor or outdoor artificial climbing walls, climbing/rappelling towers, and natural rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Chapters Contents
    --------- multipitchclimbing.com --------- This site presents the images from the ebook High: Advanced Multipitch Climbing, by David Coley and Andy Kirkpatrick. In order to keep the cost of the book to a minimum most of these were not included in the book. Although they work best when used in conjunction with the book, most are self-explanatory. Please use the following links to buy the book: Amazon USA (kindle) / Amazon UK (kindle) / itunes / kobo Back to Other Chapters Contents 1. Fall Factors / 2. Dynamic Belaying / 3 The 3-5-8 Rule / 4. Belay Device and Rope Choice / 5. Forces Depend on Angles / 6. Failing Daisies / 7. How Fast Do You Climb? / 8. What is a kN? / 9. What is a “Solid” Placement? / 10. A simple mathematical model of a climbing rope / 11. The problem with high energy falls In this chapter we expand on the basic idea of fall factors to account for rope drag, look at testing data from Petzl and Beal on real-word falls, consider if the angles between the arms of a belay really matters that much, look at how your daisy might kill you, introduce a unit of climbing speed (the Steck), discuss what the “kN” on the side of your carabiners means, present one way of defining just what is a solid placement and introduce a simple mathematical model of a rope. 1. Fall Factors The longer the fall the more energy that needs to be absorbed by the rope. The fall factor provides a useful way of distinguishing between falls of equal length (and therefore equal energy) but that have different amounts of rope out to soak up the energy of the fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitsap Basic Climbing
    ! KITSAP MOUNTAINEERS BASIC CLIMBING COURSE Class 4 and Field Trips 4 & 5 BASIC CLIMBING - CLASS #4 ROCK CLIMBING Class #4 Topics Rock Climbing Process Rock Climbing Techniques Anchors Field Trip Leader Q & A (Field Trip 4) Assigned Reading (complete prior to Class #4) Assigned Reading: Freedom Of The Hills Subject Alpine Rock Climbing ...............................................................Ch 12 Basic Climbing Course Manual All Class #4 Material Additional Resources Find a good book on stretching exercises—it is helpful to loosen up before rock climbing. ROPED CLIMBING OVERVIEW Roped climbing involves the leader and follower(s) attached to a rope for protection as they ascend and descend, so that in the event of a fall the rope can be used to catch the falling climber. In basic rock climbing, the leader is tied into one end of a rope and the follower (second) into the other end. The follower may also attach to a “ground anchor” and will prepare to belay the leader by feeding the rope through his/her belay device. When the follower (belayer) is ready (follower yells: “BELAY ON”), the leader ascends a section of rock (leader: “CLIMBING”, follower: “CLIMB”) while placing protection gear and connecting the climbing rope to the protection as he/she climbs upward. In event of a fall (leader: “FALLING!”), the belayer stops the fall by “braking” the rope at the belay device, and tightening the rope through the protections. When the leader has reached the top of the section (pitch), the leader sets up an anchor and attaches him/ her. The leader tells the follower to take him/her off belay (leader: “OFF BELAY”).
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment for Abseiling
    Risk Assessment for Abseiling Reviews Completed By Revision Date Approved By Approval Date 171 Nojoor Road Twin waters QLD 4564 P: 1300 122677 R Shanks 04/04/2019 D Davidson 04/04/2019 Apexcamps.com.au Risk level Action required/approval Document controls in planning documents and/or complete this Some chance or an incident or injury requiring Curriculum Activity Risk Assessment. Medium first aid Consider obtaining parental/carer permission. Minimum supervision At least 1 qualified Activity Instructor and 1 competent Activities Assistant are to be present to run Abseiling. Total 2. Recommendations Abseiling is recommended for grade 5 and above for the 6 metre tower. It is recommended grades 7 and above can abseil from 12 metres . It is strongly recommended that at least 1 group teachers/supervisors are present to assist with student behaviours All Apex activities staff and contractors hold at a minimum ,one of the following qualifications /skills sets or other recognised skill sets/ qualifications from another jurisdiction, along with mandatory First Aid/ CPR and QLD Blue Card, working with children check. • Staff trained for correct use of “Gri Gri” safety device that lowers the rock climbing . • Certificate 3 Outdoor Recreation specialising in Rock Climbing & Abseiling Natural or Artificial Surfaces • Certificate 4 Outdoor Recreation specialising in Rock Climbing & Abseiling Natural or Artificial Surfaces • Diploma Outdoor recreation specialising is Rock Climbing & Abseiling Natural or Artificial Surfaces • Perform Vertical Rescue also Haul system abseil only. Through the use of well maintained equipment, training, accredited staff and sound operating procedures and policies, Apex Camps control the “real risks” associated with this activity In assessing the level of risk, considerations such as the likelihood of an incident happening in combination with the seriousness of a consequence are used to gauge the overall risk level for an activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Firestarters Summits of Desire Visionaries & Vandals
    31465_Cover 12/2/02 9:59 am Page 2 ISSUE 25 - SPRING 2002 £2.50 Firestarters Choosing a Stove Summits of Desire International Year of Mountains FESTIVAL OF CLIMBING Visionaries & Vandals SKI-MOUNTAINEERING Grit Under Attack GUIDEBOOKS - THE FUTURE TUPLILAK • LEADERSHIP • METALLIC EQUIPMENT • NUTRITION FOREWORD... NEW SUMMITS s the new BMC Chief Officer, writing my first ever Summit Aforeword has been a strangely traumatic experience. After 5 years as BMC Access Officer - suddenly my head is on the block. Do I set out my vision for the future of the BMC or comment on the changing face of British climbing? Do I talk about the threats to the cliff and mountain envi- ronment and the challenges of new access legislation? How about the lessons learnt from foot and mouth disease or September 11th and the recent four fold hike in climbing wall insurance premiums? Big issues I’m sure you’ll agree - but for this edition I going to keep it simple and say a few words about the single most important thing which makes the BMC tick - volunteer involvement. Dave Turnbull - The new BMC Chief Officer Since its establishment in 1944 the BMC has relied heavily on volunteers and today the skills, experience and enthusi- District meetings spearheaded by John Horscroft and team asm that the many 100s of volunteers contribute to climb- are pointing the way forward on this front. These have turned ing and hill walking in the UK is immense. For years, stal- into real social occasions with lively debates on everything warts in the BMC’s guidebook team has churned out quality from bolts to birds, with attendances of up to 60 people guidebooks such as Chatsworth and On Peak Rock and the and lively slideshows to round off the evenings - long may BMC is firmly committed to getting this important Commit- they continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Rock Climbing Safety Using a Systems Engineering Approach
    Lyle Halliday u5366214 Improving Rock Climbing Safety using a Systems Engineering Approach ENGN2225- Systems Engineering and Design, Portfolio Abstract This portfolio outlines an application of Systems Engineering methods to the sport of Rock climbing. The report outlines an organized, logical analysis of the system that is involved in making this sport safe and aims to improve the system as a whole through this analysis. Steps taken include system scoping, requirements engineering, system function definition, subsystem integration and system attributes which contribute toward a final concept. Two recommendations are made, one being a bouldering mat which incorporates the transportation of other equipment, the other being complete, standardised bolting protocols. These concepts are then verified against the design criteria and evaluated. 1.0 System scoping: A systematic way of establishing the boundaries of the project and focusing the design problem to an attainable goal. The project focuses on Lead Climbing. 2.0 Requirements engineering: Establishing the true requirements of climbers, and what they search for in a climbing safety system 2.1 Pairwise Analysis: Establishing safety, ease of use and durability as primary design goals 2.2 Design Requirements and Technical Performance Measures: Specifying the design requirements into attainable engineering parameters. 2.3 House of Quality: Identifying the trade-offs between safety and functionality/ cost and the need for a whole-of-systems approach to the problem, rather than a component approach. 3.0 System Function Definition: Establishing concepts and system processes. 3.1 Concept Generation and Classification: Identifying possible and existing solutions on a component level and taking these to a subsystem level.
    [Show full text]
  • Belaying » Get It Right!
    BeLaYing » get it right! British Mountaineering Council Working for Climbers, hill Walkers and Mountaineers CheCk Harness CheCk KnOT CheCk BeLaY PAY aTTENTiOn! KnOw how to use your gear there are many different ropes and belaying devices available. read and understand the manufacturer’s instructions. if still unsure, get advice from someone more experienced. never belay with equipment you do not know how to use. COnTrol the rOpe Belaying is a complex skill requiring practice and experience to become competent. inattentive belaying is the cause of many preventable climbing accidents. Mistakes can result in serious injuries for climber, belayer or both. Check both climber’s knot and belay device before starting a climb. ensure your rope is long enough for your climb. if in doubt knot the free rope end. Pay attention and keep a controlling hand on the rope. geT in the BesT pOsiTiOn Anticipate the direction of pull, and position yourself appropriately. if you stand near the foot of a climb you are less likely to be pulled off balance when holding a fall or lowering a climber. if there is a lot of rope paid out the climber could hit the ground. Standing near the climb results in less rope between belayer and climber. When the climber is not moving, hold the rope in the locked position. suppOrT BriTisH CLiMBing – jOin THe BMC TOdaY: WWW.THeBMC.Co.uk T: 0161 445 6111 Belay deviCe deSign there are two types of belay device: manual devices and assisted braking devices. A manual device employs mainly friction, allowing some rope slippage when holding a fall.
    [Show full text]
  • California— Yosemite
    California— Yosemite: (1) On October 25, 1952 a party composed of Bill Long, Dick Long, A l Steck and William Dunmire (22) set out to attempt an ascent of the El Capitan Buttress (east of the main face). Steck and Dunmire were the first rope of two, and on the third pitch it was Dunmire’s turn to lead. Steck, belaying from a four foot wide ledge, was anchored to a piton and had placed another piton through which he belayed Dunmire. The route led up alongside a vertical crack into which Dunmire placed two pitons, about 6 feet apart. Along this crack was a large block which appar­ ently was not a part of the cliff but wedged in on one side and the pitons tested soundly, and he felt he had no real reason to doubt their security. Another higher crack failed to be satisfactory for piton use. A spade piton, however, was placed under a somewhat rotten flake. This also was tested. Dunmire warned Steck that the top piton was not too sound. He used it for direct aid to gain a small foothold three feet above. At this point, three feet above the highest piton, twelve feet above the next and and about twenty feet above the belayer, he attempted to place a fourth piton at arms length above him in a horizontal crack under an overhang. While he was hammering his feet slipped and he fell. He fell nearly free, striking the cliff only once and landed on his shoulder and head on a ledge about 15 feet below Steck.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short and Somewhat Personal History of Yukon Glacier Studies in the Twentieth Century GARRY K.C
    ARCTIC VOL. 67, SUPPL. 1 (2014) P. 1 – 21 http://dx.doi.org/10.14430/arctic4355 A Short and Somewhat Personal History of Yukon Glacier Studies in the Twentieth Century GARRY K.C. CLARKE1 (Received 7 January 2013; accepted in revised form 22 July 2013; published online 21 February 2014) ABSTRACT. Glaciological exploration of Yukon for scientific purposes began in 1935, with the National Geographic Society’s Yukon Expedition led by Bradford Washburn and the Wood Yukon Expedition led by Walter Wood. However, Project “Snow Cornice,” launched by Wood in 1948, was the first expedition to have glacier science as its principal focus. Wood’s conception of the “Icefield Ranges Research Project” led the Arctic Institute of North America (AINA) to establish the Kluane Lake Research Station on the south shore of Kluane Lake in 1961. Virtually all subsequent field studies of Yukon glaciers were launched from this base. This short history attempts to document the trajectory of Yukon glacier studies from their beginnings in 1935 to the end of the 20th century. It describes glaciological programs conducted from AINA camps at the divide between Hubbard Glacier and the north arm of Kaskawulsh Glacier and at the confluence of the north and central arms of Kaskawulsh Glacier, as well as the galvanizing influence of the 1965 – 67 Steele Glacier surge and the inception and completion of the long-term Trapridge Glacier study. Excluded or minimized in this account are scientific studies that were conducted on or near glaciers, but did not have glaciers or glacier processes as their primary focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Karabiner Breakings When Using a Figure-Of-Eight Neville Mcmillan
    Karabiner Breakings when Using a Figure-of-Eight Neville McMillan Introduction cently, the same mode of karabiner fail- held roughly horizontally whilst abseil- ure has occurred due to the levering ac- ing. At the start of an abseil, when the or decades climbers have been us- tion of an energy absorbing system (see rope is more horizontal than vertical, ing a Figure-of-Eight (Foe) as article by Charlet). depending on the orientation of the kar- F standard equipment for abseiling. abiner, this can allow the FoE to apply a Both experts and complete novices The First Failure – a Lucky Escape large force to the gate of the karabiner, have used this piece of equipment, in- and lever it open, breaking a notch out variably attached to their harness or A climber had set up an anchor point of the locking-sleeve (see Fig. 1). waist belt by a screwgate karabiner, for top-roping at the top of a single It is thought that this happened at the without any reported problems. Yes, pitch route. He then prepared himself start of this abseil, though the climber there have been many abseiling acci- for abseiling to the ground. He wore a did not realise it at the time. A little fur- dents, due to an inadequate anchor point, or the rope getting cut, or abseil- ing off the end of the rope, or losing control of the free end of the rope, etc, etc. But until five years ago there had not been any reported failures of the Figure-of-Eight (FoE) or its attachment karabiner.
    [Show full text]