Upper Mole Flood Alleviation Scheme Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main Text

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upper Mole Flood Alleviation Scheme Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main Text Upper Mole Flood Alleviation Scheme Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main Text A04 Fourth Draft Final for Planning Submission: 28th January 2011 i We are The Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place - for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 0870 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. i Jacobs Engineering U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs Engineering U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Environment Agency. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document (a) should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole; (b) do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion; (c) are based upon the information made available to Jacobs at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this document. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs has been made. No liability is accepted by Jacobs for any use of this document, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Following final delivery of this document to the Client, Jacobs will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this document. Environment Agency Upper Mole FAS Environmental Statement ii Document History Record Client: Environment Agency Project: Upper Mole Flood Alleviation Project No: B1518000 Scheme Document title : Environmental Statement Ref. No. Originated by Checked by Reviewed by Approved by ORIGINAL NAME NAME NAME NAME Dave Jones James Hanson Chris Boon A01 Sarah Jennings DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE 18 November 2010 Document status REVISION NAME NAME NAME NAME James Hanson Chris Boon A02 Sarah Jennings Sophie Lee DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE 18th December 2010 Document status (3) REVISION NAME NAME NAME NAME Steve Mills Chris Boon A03 Sarah Jennings Steve Mills DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE 14th January 2011 Document status (3) REVISION NAME NAME NAME NAME Steve Mills Chris Boon A04 Sarah Jennings Steve Mills DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE 28th January 2011 Document status (3) Environment Agency Upper Mole FAS Environmental Statement iii Non Technical Summary Introduction and Background This Environmental Statement has been prepared to consider the effects that the Upper Mole Flood Alleviation Scheme might have on the environment. It is a requirement of UK law to carry out such an assessment, where there are likely to be impacts on the environment. The report is important to help the local councils and other interested parties, including the general public, understand where there might be impacts and how we propose to deal with them. Crawley suffers from flooding from the upper reaches of the River Mole, including the Gatwick Stream, Tilgate Stream, Crawters Brook and Ifield Brook. This affects both residential areas and Gatwick Airport. There were major flood events in 1968 and 2000 and smaller floods in other years. We (the Environment Agency) are proposing to build new flood detention reservoirs to reduce the flood risk in these areas. The scheme started with the raising of Tilgate Dam, which was the subject of a separate environmental assessment and is currently being constructed (completion estimated in early 2011). This scheme was started early as the dam also needed remedial works for safety reasons. We are now progressing the next phase of works, which includes: • replacement of the existing dam at Clay’s Lake with a new higher dam; • new flood detention reservoir at Worth Farm; • river restoration and environmental mitigation works in Grattons Park. A new flood detention reservoir at Ifield was also being progressed, but the planning application for this site has been postponed by the Environment Agency project board pending review of the business case. Once completed, the schemes (including the dam raising at Tilgate but excluding the potential future works at Ifield) would reduce the risk of flooding at 1038 properties in the Crawley and Horley areas, as well as to Gatwick Airport. The number of properties protected would be higher if climate change increases the risk of flooding in the future, as we expect it to. It is anticipated that the works would be carried out between 2011 and 2013 with the main period of construction anticipated during 2012. This Environmental Statement considers the proposed works at all three of the locations noted above and accompanies planning applications to the relevant local authorities. For more details or to comment on any of the applications, please contact the local authority for the scheme of interest: Worth Farm Clay’s Lake Grattons Park Stuart Malcolm Stuart Malcolm Paul Fairham Mid Sussex District Council Mid Sussex District Council Crawley Borough Council The following pages detail the scheme proposals for each site, along with the key impacts and proposed mitigation measures. Environment Agency Upper Mole FAS Environmental Statement iv Worth Farm i Details of the Scheme We are planning to build a new flood detention reservoir in agricultural land to the east of Crawley, close to the M23 motorway. There are no existing flood defences at the site. We would build a new embankment dam to a height of 6.5 metres above the surrounding ground, broadly parallel with the M23 motorway. No water would be stored in the reservoir for most of the year and the area could still be used for farming. However, during times of high river flows, water in the brook that would ordinarily run beneath the dam would start to pond up, creating a reservoir. The water would stay within the reservoir for a period of a few days before emptying again as water levels in the river fall. Water would be released at a steady rate so as not to cause flooding downstream. Once the scheme is complete, the water level is likely to rise up to 3.5 metres above existing bank level on average once every five years (20% annual chance), whilst the annual chance of the reservoir filling to its maximum capacity of 6.5 metres above existing bank level is 1 in 200 (0.5% annual chance). During large floods, the water could flood surrounding agricultural land and areas of trees. Once the flood waters recede, the area would return to normal. Building the new dam requires a supply of earth and rock, and we are intending to dig some of this from the ground in an area known as a “borrow pit”. We can get this material from the surrounding land within the reservoir footprint and we are proposing to dig into the area of low quality grazing land to the south of the stream to provide this. The remainder of the general fill material will be brought to the site by lorry. Once the works are complete, the borrow area would be restored to create woodland Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) habitats, improving the diversity of habitats in the area. We are likely to start some early works on site during 2011, including stockpiling of fill materials, with the main works starting in early 2012 and lasting for about a year. Having the scheme in place would contribute to provision of flood protection to 1038 properties in the Crawley and Horley areas, as well as at Gatwick Airport. This would minimise the safety and health problems that are associated with flooding such as people being hit by debris in the floodwaters or having to live in damp houses, as well as the real risk to life. It would also reduce the stress people have, wondering if they will be flooded at times of high rainfall. ii The Existing Environment The Worth Farm site lies within Mid Sussex District, to the east of Crawley. The land is currently agricultural and lies within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). The landscape is of high quality and there are areas of ancient woodland along the stream and in surrounding areas. The site lies hard up against the M23 motorway, which forms the western boundary of the site, with more continuous woodland to the east. The only public views of the site are from the Worth Way footpath to the north as it crosses the M23 and from the M23 itself. The Gatwick Stream runs through the site. This has populations of coarse fish with the dominant species being bullhead. Other species found include brook lamprey and brown trout. The steam also supports a range of invertebrate species. We have done surveys of the wildlife in the area and found that there are small populations of slow- worms, grass snakes and common lizards in areas of rough grassland such as the motorway verge.
Recommended publications
  • Land Off Smallfield Road, Horley
    Marshall & Marshall Land off Smallfield Road, Horley Flood Risk Assessment 881230-R2(01)-FRA DECEMBER 2017 RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No.: 881230 R1(01)-FRA Site: Smallfield Road, Horley Title: Flood Risk Assessment Client: Marshall & Marshall Date: December 2017 Office: Wigan Status: Draft Author C Whittingham Technical reviewer K Jackson Signature Signature Date: December 2017 Date: December 2017 Project manager C Whittingham Quality reviewer I Clark Signature Signature Date: December 2017 Date: December 2017 Issue Reviewed Approved Version/Details Date issued Author No by by 00 Draft for internal comment 20.12.17 CW KJ IC 01 Draft for client comment 21.12.17 CW KJ IC RSK LDE Ltd (RSK) has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client and RSK. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by RSK for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. No part of this report may be copied or duplicated without the express permission of RSK and the party for whom it was prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Book 2020/21
    2020/21 BUDGET - OVERVIEW 1. SUMMARY OF MAIN BUDGET PROPOSALS AND COUNCIL TAX Overview The 2020/21 Budget was approved by Full Council on 26th February 2020. The Budget reflects the policy objectives set out in the Budget Strategy 2020/21 to 2024/25. The key elements of the 2020/21 Budget are: A Council Tax increase of £4.95 a year for a Band D property (2.43%) Savings, efficiencies and increased income of £628,000 A transfer to reserves of £1,169,550 Capital spending plans provide for a total of £195.7 million to be spent from 2019/20 to 2022/23. This includes schemes such as a new town hall, works at Three Bridges Station, improvements to play facilities, waterways & drainage management and an ambitious programme of building housing stock. The capital and revenue budgets for each service are contained in this Budget Book. 2. General Fund 2020/21 General Fund Budget £’000s Net Cost of Services 15,292 Investment Income -613 Transfer to/from Reserves 1,169 Net Expenditure 15,848 Funded by New Homes Bonus 1,831 Revenue Support Grant 60 Council Tax 7,480 Collection Fund surplus – Council Tax 51 Levy Account Surplus 828288282 0 Total Retained Business Rates 6,085 0 Surplus in current year 259 6666,344 Total 15,848 How the spending has changed £m 2019/20 Budget Requirement 14.23 Efficiencies, savings and additional income identified -0.63 Improvements to Services 0.15 Reduced investment income 0.28 Reduced pension costs 0.14 Reduced income from West Sussex County Council for recycling/grass cutting 0.44 Inflation 0.42 Other -0.35 Total changes 0.45 2020/21 Net Budget Requirement 14.68 2019/20 Council Tax Requirement 7.18 Changes above 0.45 New Homes Bonus -0.36 Reduction in Government Grant - Finance settlement -0.06 Movement in Collection Fund -0.01 Levy account surplus -0.08 Retained Business Rates -0.81 Transfer to Reserves 1.17 2020/21 Council Tax Requirement 7.48 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11: Recreation and Leisure
    CHAPTER 11: RECREATION AND LEISURE INTRODUCTION 11.1 Recreation and leisure are important for the quality of life of both individuals and the community as a whole. They can help promote healthy lifestyles, a sense of place, civic pride and community spirit and the enjoyment of culture and art. At the same time, they can raise the perception of the town by non-residents. This chapter aims to promote and encourage the provision of recreation facilities in the best manner possible so that they are readily accessible to all groups within the community. MAIN CHARACTERISTICS 11.2 Partly as a result of its development as a New Town, Crawley has had recreation facilities provided to a high standard. These include two sports centres, a modern theatre and exhibition facilities, health clubs, an athletics stadium, a series of sports fields, golf courses and a driving range, and extensive public open spaces and amenity areas with footpaths and bridleways. However, the borough's population is now about 90,000 and could be between 100,000 - 105,000 by the end of the plan period - nearly twice the size of that originally planned for the New Town. Compared with many areas the population remains comparatively young and active. This population is also ethnically and demographically more diverse than at the New Town's inception. As a result, the number of people using recreation facilities has increased and the range of demand broadened, for e.g., spectator sports, informal, non-competitive and healthy activities are now being pursued. 11.3 The built-up area is now much larger than originally planned, such that open space and undeveloped land is an increasingly valuable resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 2C, Forge Wood
    CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE - 21 January 2019 REPORT NO: PES/289(a) REFERENCE NO: CR/2016/0083/ARM LOCATION: PHASE 2C, FORGE WOOD, (NORTH EAST SECTOR), CRAWLEY WARD: Pound Hill North PROPOSAL: APPROVAL OF RESERVED MATTERS FOR PHASE 2C FOR THE ERECTION OF 249 DWELLINGS, CAR PARKING INCLUDING GARAGES, INTERNAL ACCESS ROADS, FOOTPATHS, PARKING AND CIRCULATION AREA, HARD AND SOFT LANDSCAPING AND OTHER ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING WORKS (REVISED DESCRIPTION AND AMENDED PLANS RECEIVED) TARGET DECISION DATE: 2 May 2016 CASE OFFICER: Mrs V. Cheesman APPLICANTS NAME: Persimmon Ltd & Taylor Wimpey Ltd AGENTS NAME: Pegasus Group PLANS & DRAWINGS CONSIDERED: CSA/667/205 Rev, Phase 2C Residential Soft Landscape Proposals Sheet 2 of 3 CSA/667/206 Rev, Phase 2C Residential Soft Landscape Proposals Sheet 3 of 3 CSA/667/207 Rev, Phase 2c Residential Hard Landscape Proposals Sheet 1 of 3 CSA/667/209 Rev, Phase 2c Residential Hard Landscape Proposals Sheet 3 of 3 CSA/667/204 Rev , Phase 2C Residential Soft Landscape Proposals Sheet 1 of 3 18097_SK100, General Arrangement Layout Plan P.1141_10 Rev, Phase 2C Refuse Strategy P.1141_01 Rev, Phase 2C Site Layout P.1141_05 Rev, Phase 2C Garden Areas Assessment Plan P.1141_06 Rev, Phase 2C Building Heights P.1141_07 Rev, Phase 2C Affordable Housing Location Plan P.1141_09 Rev, Phase 2C Site Layout CSA/667/208 Rev, Phase 2c Residential Hard Landscape Proposal Sheet 2 of 3 18097 - DS0P2, Refuse Vehicle Drive Swept Path Analysis - Sheet 2 of 3 18097 - DS0P3, Private Cars Drive Swept Path
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Application CR/2016/0858/ARM
    CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE - 25 September 2018 REPORT NO: PES/285(b) REFERENCE NO: CR/2016/0858/ARM LOCATION: PHASE 3, FORGE WOOD (NES), CRAWLEY WARD: Pound Hill North PROPOSAL: APPROVAL OF RESERVED MATTERS FOR PHASE 3 EMPLOYMENT BUILDING, CAR PARKING, INTERNAL ACCESS ROADS, FOOTPATHS, PARKING & CIRCULATION AREAS, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE & ENGINEERING WORKS PURSUANT TO OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION CR/2015/0552/NCC FOR A NEW MIXED USE NEIGHBOURHOOD TARGET DECISION DATE: 11 January 2017 CASE OFFICER: Mrs V. Cheesman APPLICANTS NAME: Persimmon Homes Ltd AGENTS NAME: Pegasus Planning Group Limited PLANS & DRAWINGS CONSIDERED: T.0353_08, Site Location Plan T.0353_01_2 , Site Layout T.0353_06, Employment Block Elevations T.0353_07, Employment Block Floor Plan CSA/667/251, Detailed Landscape Proposals Sheet 1 of 3 CSA/667/252, Detailed Landscape Proposals Sheet 2 of 3 CSA/667/253, Detailed Landscape Proposals Sheet 3 of 3 7827/EMP-Ph/02 , Tree Protection Plan T324/01, Vehicle Swept Path of Large Refuse Vehicle T324/02, Vehicle Swept Path of Medium Size Car T324/03, Vehicle Swept Path of Ridged Vehicle T324/04, Street Lighting T324/06, Drainage, Levels & Contours T324/07, Construction Details T324/08, Cellular Storage Tank Details T.0353 14, Site Location Plan (Wider Context) T.0364-16, Bin/Cycle Stores CONSULTEE RESPONSES:- 1. GAL - Planning Department No comments to make 2. GAL - Aerodrome Safeguarding No objections subject to conditions and a crane informative 3. National Air Traffic Services (NATS) No safeguarding objection 4. WSCC - Highways No objections 5. Cycle Forum Comments on cycle parking provision, and connections to wider cycle network 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 227 10 SD01 Licence Strategy Template
    Mole Abstraction licensing strategy February 2013 A licensing strategy to manage water resources sustainably Reference number/code LIT 3097 We are the Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place - for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon House Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Tel: 0370 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency Mole CAMS 1 Map 1 Mole CAMS (Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy) area Back 2 Environment Agency Mole CAMS Foreword Kent and South London (KSL) is home to six million people and covers an area of 6,000km² with a diverse range of environments and related pressures. Proposed growth will continue to stretch the resources available to support this increasing population. Water is our most essential natural resource, and it is our job to ensure that we manage and use it effectively and sustainably. KSL is one of the driest parts of England and Wales and there are many catchments where there is little or no water available for abstraction during dry periods. Demand from agriculture and industry, and above average household consumption all add to this pressure and affect both the water environment and fresh supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Annual Review 2018
    GATWICK’S ANNUAL BIODIVERSITY REVIEW 2018 Annual report summarising our biodiversity work at the airport and updating on the progress with the benchmark award Rachel Bicker, Biodiversity consultant Thomas Errett, Environmental Advisor Thomas Simpson, Gatwick Greenspace Partnership Gatwick Airport, April 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS [1] - YEAR HIGHLIGHTS 3 [2] - MANAGEMENT REVIEW 6 [A] - SURVEILLANCE: BIODIVERSITY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS - INVASIVE SPECIES MAPPING 4 - GREAT CRESTED NEWT SURVEYING 7 - REPTILE MONITORING 8 - BREEDING BIRDS 10 [B] - ALL SPECIES REVIEW - AMPHIBIANS 13 - BATS 14 - BIRDS 16 - BOTANY 18 - FUNGI 21 - INVERTEBRATES 22 - TERRESTRIAL MAMMALS 29 [3] - COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 30 [4] - PHOTOS 35 2 [1] - YEAR HIGHLIGHTS 2018/2019 The new Biodiversity Action Plan 2018-2023 went live New species for the airport: White-letter Hairstreak Butterfly, Willow Emerald Damselfly, Plain-golden Hoverfly, Fungus Weevil New surveys: butterfly transects, pond invertebrate species Site visit from the Sussex Bee and Wasp Group Retained the Biodiversity Benchmark Award for 2018-2019 Continued engagement of airport staff and local businesses through GGP Project Officer CABI Himalayan balsam rust fungus trial completion Gatwick’s species database created Fourth summer placement ecology students Second year of Long-horned Bee monitoring by University of Sussex Our third Gatwick Wildlife week Our fifth ‘Gatwick Wildlife Day’ biological recording event European Bat Symposium tour of biodiversity areas Grassland scything workshop Gatwick Honeybees are now an Enhanced Sentinel Apiary 3 [2] – ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REVIEW [A] - SURVEILLANCE: BIODIVERSITY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Invasive species mapping There are a group of Biodiversity Performance Indicators that have been adopted by Gatwick to show continual biodiversity protection and enhancement. The mapping of invasive plant species acts as one of our Biodiversity Performance Indicators (BPIs), informing progress of our invasive species control programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Sussex Matters 79
    www.midsussex.gov.uk | Issue 79 Summer 2013 News and features from Mid Sussex District Council Have a ball this summer Council supports community sport Inside this issue: Community grants, Sussex Parallel You Games, a new access to housing scheme, how developer contributions are used for the community and lots lots m Bluebellinto winRailway East tickets Grinstead steams inside Mid Sussex Summer photo competition Three lucky winners can have their winning entries printed out on large scale canvas. In partnership with Storm Photo Books we are looking for images which show summer 2013 in Mid Sussex. All you need to do is load up your images (max 2 per person) by the end of August. Three winners will win a large scale canvas of their image. How to enter Visit www.midsussex.gov.uk/msm to enter your photos (max 2 images per person). The final deadline for entries is Saturday 31 August. Entries will available to view on the Mid Sussex District Council Facebook page. Keep your original version of the image as this will be the highest level of quality to print from, otherwise the canvas printout may be limited by the size of your image file. Good luck and get snapping! Storm Photo Books provide a photobook and canvas print service. Using their website you can order your own creation in minutes. Just choose the canvas you'd like to create, add your pictures, add text if you want and place your order. Printed on HD quality photo paper and professionally finished on a 2cm wooden frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal of Sustainability: Draft Airports National Policy Statement
    $SSHQGL[' 9$5,$7,216&216,'(5('$26)25'5$)7$,532576136 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 VARIATIONS TO OPTIONS ......................................................... 3 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 3 2 STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLE VARIATIONS ............................... 5 2.1 LGW-2R VARIATIONS ....................................................................................... 5 2.2 LHR-ENR VARIATIONS ..................................................................................... 6 2.3 LHR-NWR VARIATIONS .................................................................................. 14 3 VARIATION SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT RESULTS ................................................................................... 15 3.1 LGW-2R VARIATION: PHASING ARRANGEMENTS ..................................... 15 3.2 LHR- ENR VARIATION: ITERATION 3............................................................ 15 3.3 LHR- ENR VARIATION: ITERATION 4............................................................ 22 3.4 LHR-NWR VARIATION: M4 ............................................................................. 27 4 VARIATIONS SCREENING ASSESSMENT TABLES .............. 28 Appraisal of Sustainability App D Page 1 of 83 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Airports Commission Project No 62103867 TABLES TABLE 1 LHR-ENR SURFACE ACCESS STRATEGY ASSESSED BY THE AIRPORTS COMMISSION .................................................... 6 TABLE 2 LHR-ENR RELATED SURFACE ACCESS STRATEGY ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Gatwick Sub-Region Water Cycle Study
    ‘Gatwick Sub-region’ Joint Water Cycle Study Scoping Study March 2010 Crawley Borough Council, Horsham District Council, Mid Sussex District Council and Reigate and Banstead Borough Council 2 Contents Executive Summary 5 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background 9 1.2 Aims and Objectives 11 1.3 Steering Group 11 1.4 Report Structure 12 2.0 Gatwick Sub-regional Water Cycle Study 2.1 The Water Cycle 13 2.2 Implications for Development 13 2.3 Stages of a Water Cycle Study 14 2.4 Integration with the Local Development Framework 16 2.5 Data Limitations 16 3.0 Policy and Development Context 3.1 Gatwick Sub-Regional Study Area and Background 17 3.2 Study Area Overview 17 3.3 Planning Policy and Guidance 18 3.3.1 European and National Legislation and Guidance 18 3.3.2 Regional Policy and Guidance 20 3.3.3 Local Policy and Guidance 22 3.4 Current/Potential Strategic Allocation 25 3.4.1 Strategic Housing Sites 25 3.4.2 Strategic Employment Land 25 4.0 Water Cycle Environment and Infrastructure, Constraints and Recommendations 4.1 Introduction 32 4.2 Climate 32 4.3 Geology and Groundwater Sources 32 4.4 River Catchment Areas 33 4.5 Water Supply 35 4.6 Water Resource Management and Abstractions 38 4.7 Wastewater Treatment and Collection 44 4.8 Water Quality 47 4.9 Ecology and Biodiversity 51 4.10 Flood Risk and Flood Risk Management 54 5.0 Moving Forward 5.1 Content of the Outline Water Cycle Study 55 5.2 Next Steps 56 3 Figures Figure 1.1: Gatwick Sub-regional Strategy Area 10 Figure 2.1: The Water Cycle 13 Figure 2.2: Water Cycle Study Stages 14 Figure 4.1: The Study Area including River Catchments 33 Figure 4.2: Licensed Abstraction in the Adur and Ouse CAMS area 39 Figure 4.3: Licensed abstraction in the Arun and Western Streams CAMS 41 area Figure 4.4: Licensed abstraction in the Upper Mole CAMS area 42 Appendices Appendix 1: Data Catalogue 4 Executive Summary Background The Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) for the South East of England, the South East Plan, sets out the long term spatial planning framework for the south east region from 2006 to 2026.
    [Show full text]
  • Airside Ops Frame
    42 CROSS ROAD FB LB 41 DELTA DRIVE 2 POVEY Track CHEYNE WALK 24 25 The Caravan 23 Drain 26 57 Path (um) 1 20 1 Little Deeping Farm 68 21 22 Willowbrook SM 47 27 30 31 63 28 Marlam 29 CHARLWOOD ROAD 65 72 El Sub Sta 36 FB 19 1 55 1 18 Balancing Pond 74 Highfield 2 HOOKWOOD 17 Suvla 73 3 SM Path (um) FB Mole Pond Gatwick Stream 7 GROSVENOR CLOSE SM El Sub Sta El Sub Sta 8 84 El Sub Sta 9 12 Path (um) 75b 11 6 10 16 50 77b 75a River FB FB 81 1 5 77a 6 15 92 CHEYNE WALK Delta House 50A Cleaning Tanks SM LONDON ROAD 4 14 ESS 87 Track 5 94 2a B514 89 13 Woodbridge 52 12 2 6 1 Ranley El Sub Sta 96 97 24 Delta Bungalows 7 Melton 9 10 56 Ashdean 54 PERIMETER ROAD NORTH WOODROYD GARDENS Cherry Tree 107 1 Cottage 60 Play Area 58 Drain 5 Hall Pond PERIMETER CHARLWOOD ROAD Five Oaks London Gatwick Airport 3 1 Car Park (staff) London Gatwick Airport MICHAEL CRESCENT 2 Cranmere ROAD 22 Path (um) Woodedge 16 1 14 NORTH Anlaby 39 Path (um) Long Spinney 21 El Sub Sta Charlwood Park Woodside 27 13 Cottage WOODROYD GARDENS 10 24 Drain Windlesham NORTH 72 70 ROAD 12 32 Capelle St Michaels 13 Oakfield 76 74 Taranaki Cottage 14 Routh Path (um) PERIMETER Warwick Cottage 16 29 78 FUEL FARM ROAD The Oaks Linciter El Sub Sta 36 UPFIELD 28 29 Lighting Tower Lighting Tower Blast Screen PIER 5 42 86 49 43 45 CHARLWOOD ROAD 47 FB CRESCENT WAY 49 Shelter Path (um) 51 AVENUE FAIRFIELD 48 Air Jetty Drain Path (um) 2 1 574 Path (um) 92 Hotel Pier 5 24 2 1 574 53 6 5 4 3 2 1 573 B704 40 Northgate Building Post 6 5 4 3 2 1 573 719 River Mole LV ROOM 59 Car Park (staff) 14
    [Show full text]
  • Gatwick Stream – Riverside Garden Park, Horley
    Gatwick Stream – Riverside Garden Park, Horley An Advisory Visit by the Wild Trout Trust – January 2014 1 1. Introduction This report is the output of a Wild Trout Trust visit to the Gatwick Stream in Horley, West Sussex. The Visit was made following conversations with Fran Southgate from the Sussex Wildlife Trust (SWT) and Kevin Lerwill from the Gatwick Green Space Partnership, which is also part of the SWT. Kevin was leading a group of volunteers undertaking hedge laying and scrub clearance on-site and the opportunity was taken to meet and discuss options for the Gatwick Stream. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the visit and discussions with Kevin Lerwill and Paul Capper from the Horley Piscatorial Society. The river was in semi-spate conditions during the visit, making any evaluation of river bed gravels and spawning opportunities for flow loving fish species impossible. Throughout the report, normal convention is followed with respect to bank identification, i.e. banks are designated Left Bank (LB) or Right Bank (RB) whilst looking downstream. Section of stream inspected Section inspected 2 2. Catchment overview The Gatwick Stream is headwater tributary of the River Mole. The stream is heavily impacted by the long culvert system which takes the stream beneath the South Terminal and railway station at Gatwick Airport. The stream also receives effluent from the waste water treatment plant at Tinsley Green, as well as draining the extensive network of local roads and urban conurbation lying to the east of the Airport. The Gatwick Stream is reputed to support a small wild brown trout (Salmo trutta) population as well as eels (Anguilla Anguilla) and a mixed coarse fish community.
    [Show full text]