DOCSLIB.ORG

Protocol Implementation Plan for Monitoring Stream Condition in the Mediterranean Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network of Southern California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protocol Implementation Plan for Monitoring Stream Condition in the Mediterranean Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network of Southern California National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Protocol Implementation Plan for Monitoring Stream Condition in the Mediterranean Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network of Southern California Natural Resource Report NPS/MEDN/NRR—2019/1875 ON THIS PAGE Biologist M. Mendelsohn in Santa Monica Mountains displaying an adult Red-legged frog. NPS/Santa Monica Mountains NRA ON THE COVER Water Canyon, Santa Rosa Island in Channel Islands National Park NPS/S. OSTERMANN-KELM Protocol Implementation Plan for Monitoring Stream Condition in the Mediterranean Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network of Southern California Natural Resource Report NPS/MEDN/NRR—2019/1875 Felicia Federico1, Raphael Mazor2, Lena Lee3, Stacey Ostermann-Kelm3 1University of California, Los Angeles Institute of the Environment and Sustainability La Kretz Hall, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90095 2Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 3535 Harbor Blvd, Suite 110 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 3National Park Service Mediterranean Coast Network Inventory and Monitoring Program 401 West Hillcrest Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 February 2019 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Mediterranean Coast Network website and the Natural Resource Publications Management website. If you have difficulty accessing information in this publication, particularly if using assistive technology, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Federico, F., R. Mazor, L. Lee, and S. Ostermann-Kelm. 2019. Protocol implementation plan for monitoring stream condition in the Mediterranean Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network of Southern California. Natural Resource Report NPS/MEDN/NRR—2019/1875. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 963/150624, February 2019 ii Contents Page Figures................................................................................................................................................... vi Tables ................................................................................................................................................... vii Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) ..............................................................................................viii Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................. xi Glossary ............................................................................................................................................... xii Acronyms and Abbreviations............................................................................................................... xii 1 Background and Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 The National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program....................................... 1 1.1.2 Parks Included in This Protocol Implementation Plan ..................................................... 2 1.1.3 Rationale for Monitoring Stream Condition using Benthic Invertebrates (Water Quality and Riverine Integrity) ..................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Protocol Implementation Plan Development Process ...................................................... 2 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2.1 Geographic Setting ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.2.3 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.4 Major Watersheds ............................................................................................................. 7 1.2.5 Land Use and Stream Conditions ................................................................................... 10 1.2.6 Aquatic Species .............................................................................................................. 12 1.2.7 Regulatory Status / Impaired Waterbodies ..................................................................... 13 1.2.8 Summary of Current and Historic Monitoring at SAMO and CHIS .............................. 14 1.2.9 Aquatic Amphibian Monitoring at SAMO ..................................................................... 16 1.2.10 Summary of Monitoring Drivers .................................................................................. 16 1.3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................... 17 1.3.1 Management Questions .................................................................................................. 17 1.3.2 Measureable Objectives .................................................................................................. 18 iii Contents (continued) Page 1.3.3 Monitoring Approach ..................................................................................................... 18 2 Sampling Design ............................................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Rationale for This Monitoring Approach ............................................................................... 21 2.1.1 SAMO ............................................................................................................................ 21 2.1.2 CHIS ............................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.3 Regional Coordination.................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Sampling Domain ................................................................................................................... 23 2.2.1 SAMO ............................................................................................................................ 23 2.2.2 CHIS ............................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Sample Frame ......................................................................................................................... 24 2.3.1 SAMO ............................................................................................................................ 24 2.3.2 CHIS ............................................................................................................................... 24 2.4 Stratification ........................................................................................................................... 24 2.4.1 SAMO ............................................................................................................................ 24 2.4.2 CHIS ............................................................................................................................... 25 2.5 Site Selection .......................................................................................................................... 25
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MCB Camp Pendleton Arroyo Toad (Bufo Californicus) Monitoring Results, 2003
    MCB Camp Pendleton Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Monitoring Results, 2003 Annual Report Prepared for: Wildlife Management Branch AC/S Environmental Security Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER MCB Camp Pendleton Arroyo Toad Monitoring Results, 2003 By Cheryl S. Brehme, Andrea J. Atkinson, and Robert N. Fisher U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER Annual Report Prepared for: Wildlife Management Branch AC/S Environmental Security Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton San Diego Field Station USGS Western Ecological Research Center 5745 Kearny Villa Road, Suite M San Diego, CA 92123 Sacramento, California 2004 ii U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, SECRETARY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, or brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information, contact: Center Director USGS Western Ecological Research Center 3020 State University Drive East Modoc Hall, Room 3006 Sacramento, CA 95819 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 The Arroyo Toad..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biology 2 Lab Packet for Practical 4
    1 Biology 2 Lab Packet For Practical 4 2 CLASSIFICATION: Domain: Eukarya Supergroup: Unikonta Clade: Opisthokonts Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata – Chordates Subphylum: Urochordata - Tunicates Class: Amphibia – Amphibians Subphylum: Cephalochordata - Lancelets Order: Urodela - Salamanders Subphylum: Vertebrata – Vertebrates Order: Apodans - Caecilians Superclass: Agnatha Order: Anurans – Frogs/Toads Order: Myxiniformes – Hagfish Class: Testudines – Turtles Order: Petromyzontiformes – Lamprey Class: Sphenodontia – Tuataras Superclass: Gnathostomata – Jawed Vertebrates Class: Squamata – Lizards/Snakes Class: Chondrichthyes - Cartilaginous Fish Lizards Subclass: Elasmobranchii – Sharks, Skates and Rays Order: Lamniiformes – Great White Sharks Family – Agamidae – Old World Lizards Order: Carcharhiniformes – Ground Sharks Family – Anguidae – Glass Lizards Order: Orectolobiniformes – Whale Sharks Family – Chameleonidae – Chameleons Order: Rajiiformes – Skates Family – Corytophanidae – Helmet Lizards Order: Myliobatiformes - Rays Family - Crotaphytidae – Collared Lizards Subclass: Holocephali – Ratfish Family – Helodermatidae – Gila monster Order: Chimaeriformes - Chimaeras Family – Iguanidae – Iguanids Class: Sarcopterygii – Lobe-finned fish Family – Phrynosomatidae – NA Spiny Lizards Subclass: Actinistia - Coelocanths Family – Polychrotidae – Anoles Subclass: Dipnoi – Lungfish Family – Geckonidae – Geckos Class: Actinopterygii – Ray-finned Fish Family – Scincidae – Skinks Order: Acipenseriformes – Sturgeon, Paddlefish Family – Anniellidae
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Unit Y2 Wastewater Interceptor Rehabilitation Project (Ci 5328)
    DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNIT Y2 WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR REHABILITATION PROJECT (CI 5328) Lead Agency: City of Thousand Oaks 2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard Thousand Oaks, California 91362 Contact: Mr. Nader Heydari (805) 449-2392 Prepared by: Padre Associates, Inc. 1861 Knoll Drive Ventura, CA 93003 (805) 644-2220 December 2020 Project No. 1902-2181 City of Thousand Oaks Unit Y2 Interceptor Rehabilitation (CI 5328) Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ......................................................................... MND-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Legal Authority ...................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Proponent and Lead Agency .......................................................... 1 1.3 Project Location ......................................................................................... 1 1.4 Project Background .................................................................................... 1 1.5 Project Purpose and Need ......................................................................... 1 1.6 Project Approvals and Permits ................................................................... 1 1.7 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .......................................................................... 2 1.8 Adoption of the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration ................................. 2 1.9 Preparers of this Initial
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States State of the Union
    STATE OF THE UNION: Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States STATE OF THE UNION: Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States Coordinating Editors Priya Nanjappa1 and Paulette M. Conrad2 Editorial Assistants Randi Logsdon3, Cara Allen3, Brian Todd4, and Betsy Bolster3 1Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Washington, DC 2Nevada Department of Wildlife Las Vegas, NV 3California Department of Fish and Game Sacramento, CA 4University of California-Davis Davis, CA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WE THANK THE FOLLOWING PARTNERS FOR FUNDING AND IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT, EDITING, AND PRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT: US Fish & Wildlife Service Competitive State Wildlife Grant Program funding for “Amphibian & Reptile Conservation Need” proposal, with its five primary partner states: l Missouri Department of Conservation l Nevada Department of Wildlife l California Department of Fish and Game l Georgia Department of Natural Resources l Michigan Department of Natural Resources Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Missouri Conservation Heritage Foundation Arizona Game and Fish Department US Fish & Wildlife Service, International Affairs, International Wildlife Trade Program DJ Case & Associates Special thanks to Victor Young for his skill and assistance in graphic design for this document. 2009 Amphibian & Reptile Regulatory Summit Planning Team: Polly Conrad (Nevada Department of Wildlife), Gene Elms (Arizona Game and Fish Department), Mike Harris (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), Captain Linda Harrison (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Priya Nanjappa (Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies), Matt Wagner (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department), and Captain John West (since retired, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) Nanjappa, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Extirpation of a North American Frog Coincides with an Increase in Fungal Pathogen Prevalence: Historical Analysis and Implications for Reintroduction
    Received: 8 April 2017 | Revised: 6 August 2017 | Accepted: 19 August 2017 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3468 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Rapid extirpation of a North American frog coincides with an increase in fungal pathogen prevalence: Historical analysis and implications for reintroduction Andrea J. Adams1 | Allan P. Pessier2 | Cheryl J. Briggs1 1Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Abstract Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA As extinctions continue across the globe, conservation biologists are turning to spe- 2 Department of Veterinary Microbiology cies reintroduction programs as one optimistic tool for addressing the biodiversity cri- and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, sis. For repatriation to become a viable strategy, fundamental prerequisites include Pullman, WA, USA determining the causes of declines and assessing whether the causes persist in the Correspondence environment. Invasive species—especially pathogens—are an increasingly significant Andrea J. Adams, Department of Ecology, factor contributing to biodiversity loss. We hypothesized that Batrachochytrium dend- Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, robatidis (Bd), the causative agent of the deadly amphibian disease chytridiomycosis, USA. was important in the rapid (<10 years) localized extirpation of a North American frog Email: [email protected] (Rana boylii) and that Bd remains widespread among extant amphibians in the region of Funding information extirpation. We used an interdisciplinary approach, combining interviews with herpe- Division of Environmental Biology, Grant/ Award Number: DEB-1557190; Robert and tological experts, analysis of archived field notes and museum specimen collections, Patricia Switzer Foundation and field sampling of the extant amphibian assemblage to examine (1) historical rela- tive abundance of R.
    [Show full text]
  • Tehachapi Renewable FEIS Volume III Appendix B2 Biological Evaluation.Pdf
    Appendix B.2 Biological Evaluation TRTP BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION 2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION .............................................................................................. 15 Forest Land and Resources Management Plan (LRMP) ......................................................................... 15 Program Strategies and Tactics ...................................................................................................... 16 Applicable Land Management Plan Standards .............................................................................. 17 Forest Service Manual 2081.03 .............................................................................................................. 19 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) ........................................................................................ 20 Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (2007) ........................................................................................... 20 California Spotted Owl Conservation Strategy ....................................................................................... 20 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 22 Segment 11: Mesa – Vincent (via Gould) 500/220 kV T/L ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biology 2 Lab Packet for Practical 4
    1 Biology 2 Lab Packet For Practical 4 2 CLASSIFICATION: Domain: Eukarya Supergroup: Unikonta Clade: Opisthokonts Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata – Chordates Subphylum: Urochordata - Tunicates Class: Amphibia – Amphibians Subphylum: Cephalochordata - Lancelets Order: Urodela - Salmanders Subphylum: Vertebrata – Vertebrates Order: Anurans – Frogs/Toads Superclass: Agnatha Order: Apodans - Caecilians Class: Cephalaspidomorphi – Lamprey Class: Testudines – Turtles Class: Myxini – Hagfish Class: Sphenodontia – Tuataras SuperClass: Gnathostomata – Jawed Vertebrates Class: Chondrichthyes - Cartilagenous Fish Class: Squamata – Lizards/Snakes Subclass:Elasmobranchii Lizards Order: Selachiformes - Sharks Family – Agamidae – Old World Lizards Order: Batiformes – Skates and Rays Family – Anguidae – Glass Lizards Subclass: Holocephali - Ratfish Family – Chameleonidae – Chameleons Class: Sarcopterygii – Lobe-finned fish Family – Corytophanidae – Helmet Lizards Subclass: Coelacanthimorpha - Coelocanths Family - Crotaphytidae – Collared Lizards Subclass: Dipnoi – Lungfish Family – Helodermatidae – Gila Monster Class: Actinopterygii – Ray-finned Fish Family – Iguanidae – Iguanids Infraclass: Holostei Family – Phrynosomatidae – NA Spiny Lizards Order: Lepisoteriformes - Gars Family – Polychrotidae – Anoles Order: Amiiformes – Bowfin Family – Geckkonidae – Geckos Infraclass: Teleostei Superorder: Osteoglossomorpha Snakes Order: Osteoglossiformes - Arrowana Family – Boidae – Pythons and Boas Superorder: Elopomorpha Family – Colubridae – Colubrids Order:
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol for Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians in the Mediterranean Coast Network Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Protocol for Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians in the Mediterranean Coast Network Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Natural Resource Report NPS/MEDN/NRR—2011/474 ON THE COVER (Pacific treefrog, Pseudacris regilla) Photograph by: Katy Semple Delaney, National Park Service, Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Protocol for Monitoring Aquatic Amphibians in the Mediterranean Coast Network Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Natural Resource Report NPS/MEDN/NRR—2011/474 Kathleen Semple Delaney, Seth P. D. Riley, Gary Busteed, and Morgan Robertson National Park Service Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area 401 W. Hillcrest Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Stacey Ostermann-Kelm, Lena Lee, J. Lane Cameron Mediterranean Coast Network National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program 401 W. Hillcrest Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Stephen Hayes University of Idaho Department of Statistical Sciences Brink Hall Moscow, ID 83844-1104 Kathryn Irvine Department of Mathematical Sciences 2-227 Wilson Hall Montana State University Bozeman, MT 59717-2400 September 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Integrated Feasibility Report/2014 Draft EIS/EIS)
    US Army Corps of Engineers® Los Angeles District Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study Final USFWS Coordination Act Report (CAR) Appendix N September 2015 Appendix N: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Coordination Act Report (CAR) Summary The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on the Los Angeles River (LAR) Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study throughout the planning process. USFWS participated in the project’s stakeholder charettes in December 2009 and throughout the Habitat Evaluation (CHAP) process. The Corps also coordinated with USFWS per the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (16 U.S.C. 703, et seq.), which provides the authority for involvement of the USFWS in evaluating impacts to fish and wildlife from proposed water resource development projects. Federal agencies undertaking water projects are required to fully consider recommendations made by the USFWS regarding the conservation, maintenance, and management of wildlife resources and habitat, which are provided in a Coordination Act Report (CAR) or Planning Aid Letter (PAL). For this project, USFWS was funded to prepare a CAR. USFWS provided preliminary CAR recommendations on the project in November 2013, and the Draft CAR was submitted to the Corps in January 2014. The Corps coordinated with USFWS during development of the CAR from November 2013 to January 2015. The Corps met with USFWS regarding the CAR recommendations on September 29, 2014 and on October 30, 2014. The Corps fully considered the CAR recommendations and committed to continued coordination with USFWS during the detailed design phase of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Toad Survey Report 2010
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Arroyo Toad (Anaxyrus californicus) Survey Report 2010 23 March 2011 Arroyo Toad Survey Report 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................................2 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ...............................................................................................................3 SURVEY SITE SELECTION...................................................................................................................3 SURVEY METHODS ............................................................................................................................4 RESULTS ..........................................................................................................................................................5 DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................................................................9 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE SURVEYS ...................................................................................11 LITERATURE CITED.......................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Decline and Localized
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Decline and localized extirpation of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) in the presence of the fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis: Contemporary and historical perspectives A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology by Andrea J. Adams Committee in charge: Professor Cheryl J. Briggs, Chair Professor Samuel S. Sweet, Co-chair Dr. Roland Knapp, Research Biologist March 2017 The dissertation of Andrea J. Adams is approved. _____________________________________________ Roland A. Knapp _____________________________________________ Samuel S. Sweet, Committee Co-chair _____________________________________________ Cheryl J. Briggs, Committee Chair March 2017 Decline and localized extirpation of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) in the presence of the fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis: Contemporary and historical perspectives Copyright © 2017 by Andrea J. Adams iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my advisors, Cherie Briggs and Sam Sweet, who lit the path while allowing room for my unconventional approach to walking it. Cherie couples her quantitative brilliance with realistic optimism and grace to create elegant science. Sam shares freely and generously his profound knowledge of the natural history and ecology of amphibians and reptiles and is tenaciously committed to their conservation. Roland Knapp is a highly skilled scientist whose depth and breadth of knowledge, understanding, and experience helped guide me through challenging ecological questions and research hurdles. I am grateful to the entire Briggs Lab for their encouragement, support, and assistance. I am especially grateful to Andrea Jani her advice and for answering my phone calls from the lab bench, Tom Smith for his dependable support and advice, Mary Toothman for teaching me the proper way to run a high-throughput molecular laboratory, and Mark Wilber, for generously sharing of his time and statistical mastery.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Section of Revised Draft
    SANTA BARBARA RANCH REVISED DRAFT EIR 9.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Sectiion 9..4 Biiollogiicall This section focuses on vegetation, wildlife habitats, non-regulated wildlife, and special-status Resources plants and animals as they relate to the Alternative 1 area. Special-status species occurrence records on the coastal terraces and south-facing slopes of the Santa Ynez Mountains between Goleta and Point Conception are evaluated. Potential project-related impacts are analyzed and mitigation measures are recommended to reduce these impacts to less than significant levels, where possible. 9.4.1 Regional Environmental Setting The Alternative 1 area is located on the southern foothills and associated coastal terraces of the Santa Ynez Mountains. The Santa Ynez Mountains are the western extension of the Transverse Ranges, a geomorphic unit characterized by east-west trending faults, folds, mountain ranges, and valleys. The coastal plain is composed of uplifted and dissected marine terraces, hills, and valleys, some of which form estuaries and lagoons (Dibblee, 1966). The south-facing slopes and foothills of the Santa Ynez Mountains and the coastal plain are highly dissected by drainage features. Consequently, differences in aspect and degree of slope create a variety of microclimates, often within a small area, which along with spatial variation in soil and bedrock features, control the distribution of native vegetation types and ultimately, the distribution of plant and wildlife species in this region. The coastal terraces and extreme southern portions of the foothills in the project area are formed on the Sisquoc, Rincon, and Monterey Shales. Soils derived from this formation tend to be deep, heavy clays.
    [Show full text]