Supplementary Table 1: Differentially Methylated Genes and Functions of the Genes Before/After Treatment with A) Doxorubicin and B) FUMI and in C) Responders Vs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supplementary Table 1: Differentially Methylated Genes and Functions of the Genes Before/After Treatment with A) Doxorubicin and B) FUMI and in C) Responders Vs Supplementary Table 1: Differentially methylated genes and functions of the genes before/after treatment with a) doxorubicin and b) FUMI and in c) responders vs. non- responders for doxorubicin and d) FUMI Differentially methylated genes before/after treatment a. Doxo GENE FUNCTION CCL5, CCL8, CCL15, CCL21, CCR1, CD33, IL5, immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes IL8, IL24, IL26, TNFSF11 CCNA1, CCND2, CDKN2A cell cycle regulators ESR1, FGF2, FGF14, FGF18 growth factors WT1, RASSF5, RASSF6 tumor suppressor b. FUMI GENE FUNCTION CCL7, CCL15, CD28, CD33, CD40, CD69, TNFSF18 immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes CCND2, CDKN2A cell cycle regulators IGF2BP1, IGFBP3 growth factors HOXB4, HOXB6, HOXC8 regulation of cell transcription WT1, RASSF6 tumor suppressor Differentially methylated genes in responders vs. non-responders c. Doxo GENE FUNCTION CBR1, CCL4, CCL8, CCR1, CCR7, CD1A, CD1B, immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes CD1D, CD1E, CD33, CD40, IL5, IL8, IL20, IL22, TLR4 CCNA1, CCND2, CDKN2A cell cycle regulators ESR2, ERBB3, FGF11, FGF12, FGF14, FGF17 growth factors WNT4, WNT16, WNT10A implicated in oncogenesis TNFSF12, TNFSF15 apoptosis FOXL1, FOXL2, FOSL1,HOXA2, HOXA7, HOXA11, HOXA13, HOXB4, HOXB6, HOXB8, HOXB9, HOXC8, regulation of cell transcription HOXD8, HOXD9, HOXD11 GSTP1, MGMT DNA repair APC, WT1 tumor suppressor d. FUMI GENE FUNCTION CCL1, CCL3, CCL5,CCL14, CD1B, CD33, CD40, CD69, immunoregulatory and inflammatory IL20, IL32 processes CCNA1, CCND2, CDKN2A cell cycle regulators IGF2BP1, IGFBP3, IGFBP7, EGFR, ESR2,RARB2 growth factors HOXA1, HOXA2, HOXA7, HOXA9, HOXB4, HOXB6, regulation of cell transcription HOXC8, HOXD9 BRCA1, GSTP1 DNA repair WT1, RASSF6 tumor suppressor ABCB1 development of resistance to anticancer drugs Red marked genes- genes with higher methylation levels after treatment Green marked genes- genes with higher methylation levels before treatment Supplementary Table 2: Ingenuity Pathway analysis of: a) genes differentially methylated before and after treatment with doxorubicin and b) genes differentially methylated before and after treatment with FUMI; c) genes differentially methylated between responders and non-responders for doxorubicin and d) genes differentially methylated between responders and non-responders for FUMI 2a. Top Canonical Pathways overrepresented P-value FDR Ratio Molecules associated with the pathway in differentially methylated genes before/after treatment (doxorubicin) 9.88E-06 0.003 13/126 ABCG1,APOA5,APOB,APOD,CYP7A1,FGA, LXR/RXR activation IL37,IL1RL1,KNG1,RBP4,SAA1,TNFRSF1B,TTR Communication between 1,97E-04 0.03 9/93 CCL5,CCL15, CD86, CD8A,CXCL10, IL5,IL8 Innate and Adaptive IL37,TNFSF13B Immune Cells Role of Cytokines in 2.86E-04 0.03 7/52 IFNA4,IL5,IL8,IL21,IL24,IL26,IL37 Mediating Communication Between Immune Cells Molecules 2b. Top Canonical Pathways overrepresented P-value FDR Ratio Molecules associated with the pathway in differentially methylated genes before/after treatment (fumi) Retinoate Biosynthesis 2.19E-03 0.2 4/30 ADH7,ALDH1A3,RDH5,RDH8 Gαi Signaling 2.24E-03 0.2 8/128 ADCY4,FPR1,GABBR2,GNB5,GNG4,HTR1B, P2RY14,PRKAR1B LXR/RXR Activation 2.36E-03 0.2 8/126 CCL7,FGA,GC,IL18RAP,PLTP,S100A8,TF, TNFRSF1B Cardiac β-adrenergic 3.86E-03 0.2 8/139 ADCY4,AKAP2,GNB5,GNG4,PKIA,PPP1R7, Signaling PRKAR1B,RYR2 2c. Top Canonical Pathways overrepresented P-value FDR Ratio Molecules associated with the pathway in differentially methylated genes responders vs. non - responders (doxorubicin) Communication between 6.36E-05 0.027 17/93 CCL4,CCR7,CD40,CD86,CD8A,CXCL10, Innate and Adaptive HLA-C,HLA-E,IFNA21,IFNA13,IL5,IL8,IL10, Immune Cells TLR1,TLR4,TLR7,TNFSF13B Atherosclerosis Signaling 1.27E-04 0.027 21/131 ALOX15,APCC1,APOD,CD40,COL1-1A2,8A1, A1,A2,CXCL12,IL8,ITGA4,LPL,MMP1,ORM2, PDGFC,PLA2G-7,16,1B,RBP4,SELE,TNFSF12 2d. Top Canonical Pathways overrepresented P-value FDR Ratio Molecules associated with the pathway in differentially methylated genes responders vs. non responders (fumi) cAMP-mediated Signaling 2.15E-06 0.0009 34/217 ADCY5,8,9,ADORA1,ADRB3,AKAP12,CHRM5, CNGA2,DRD1,4,5,FPR1,GABBR2,GRM4,8, HTR-4,7,1B,1D,1E,LHCGR,OPR-D1,K1,P2RY- 13,14,PDE4-B,C,PKIA,PPP3R2,PTGER2, RAP1GAP,RGS7,S1PR3,VIPR2 G-Protein Coupled Receptor 3.11 E-05 0.006 35/260 ADCY5,8,9,ADORA1,ADRB3,CHRM5,DRD- Signaling 1,4,5,FPR1,GABBR2,GNA15,GRM-1,4,8, HTR-4,81B,1D,1E,2A, LHCGR,OPR-D1,K1, P2RY-13,14,PDE-4B,4C,PRKCG,PTGER2, RAP1GAP,RGS7,S1PR3, VIPR2 Dopamine-DARPP32 3.26E-04 0.03 23/161 ADCY-5,8,9,ATP2A-1,3,DRD-1,4,5,GRIN2A Feedback in cAMP GUCY1A3,KCNJ-2,6,9,10,NOS1,PLCD1, Signaling PPP1-CA,R14C,3A,PPP3R2,PRK-CG,CQ,G2 Supplementary Table 3: A) List of the 46 genes differentially methylated before and after treatment with both drugs -genome wide screening Probe Gene Descriptions CytoMap location cg15814508 P2RY14 purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 14 3q24-q25.1 cg09748960 BTNL2 butyrophilin-like protein 2 6p21.3 cg11122968 CD33 CD33 molecule 19q13.3 cg08654334 DIRC1 disrupted in renal carcinoma protein 1 2q33 cg12351433 LHCGR lutropin-choriogonadotropic hormone receptor 2p21 cg22081096 ABCA6 ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 6 17q24.3 cg05000446 C9orf131 uncharacterized protein C9orf131 9p13.3 cg16505204 THRSP thyroid hormone-inducible hepatic protein 11q14.1 cg14458834 HOXB4 homeobox protein Hox-B4 17q21.32 cg16175792 HSD3B1 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/Delta 5-->4-isomerase type I 1p13.1 cg08920071 CD101 immunoglobulin superfamily, member 2 1p13 cg08704606 MRC1 macrophage mannose receptor 1-like protein 1 10p12.33 cg12925542 WDR49 WD repeat-containing protein 49 3q26.1 cg02622316 ZSCAN12 zinc finger protein 96 6p21 cg08130265 LINC00597 long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 597 15q23-q24 cg19176447 AKAP2 protein kinase A anchoring protein 2 9q31.3 cg12840719 CDKN2A cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A 9p21 cg21087137 GLIPR1L1 GLI pathogenesis-related 1 like 1 12q21.2 cg26189983 TNFRSF1B tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B 1p36.22 cg24893837 ARSB arylsulfatase B 5q14.1 cg16670497 GSTM2 glutathione S-aralkyltransferase M2 1p13.3 cg23110514 LCE3E Late envelope protein 17 1q21.3 cg03889226 OLIG3 oligodendrocyte transcription factor 3 6q23.3 cg22334665 SLC22A16 solute carrier family 22 member 16 6q22.1 cg12717594 RECK reversion-inducing-cysteine-rich protein with kazal motifs 9p13.3 cg05421688 FAM163A neuroblastoma-derived secretory protein 1q25.2 cg02657438 STON2 stoned B homolog 2 14q31.1 cg19063972 SOX21 transcription factor SOX-21 13q31-q32 cg15778232 PHB2 Repressor of estrogen receptor activity 12p13 cg15343119 GALR1 galanin receptor type 1 18q23 cg09636671 LMOD1 leiomodin-1 1q32 cg15016628 BRS3 bombesin receptor subtype-3 Xq26.3 cg04574507 CD1B CD1b molecule 1q22-q23 cg14988503 CDKL2 cyclin-dependent kinase-like 2 4q21.1 cg12827188 FGA fibrinogen, A alpha polypeptide 4q28 cg08157292 PPP1R7 Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 22 2q37.3 cg17480438 KIAA1244 brefeldin A-inhibited guanine nucleotide-exchange protein 3 6q23.3 cg15377518 ZEB2 Zinc finger homeobox protein 1b 2q22.3 cg16742703 KLK3 kallikrein-3 19q13.41 cg15494458 BPI recombinant BPI holoprotein, rBPI 20q11.23 cg07136161 CYLC2 cylicin-2 9q31.1 cg07084163 UGT3A2 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 3A2 5p13.2 cg00779924 GATA3-AS1 GATA3 antisense RNA 1 10p14 cg21792432 POT1 protection of telomeres 1 7q31.33 cg03996822 RASSF6 ras association domain-containing protein 6 4q13.3 cg09848074 KLRG2 killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily G member 2 7q34 B) Function of the genes differentially methylated before and after treatment with both drugs Differentially methylated genes before/after treatment with both drugs GENE FUNCTION P2RY14, BTNL2, CD33,CD101, CD1B, Immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes MRC1, CDKN2A, CDKL2 cell cycle regulators GALR1 / RASSF6 /TNFRSF1B growth factors/ tumor suppressor /apoptosis ABCA6 macrophage lipid homeostasis CYLC2, BRS3 sperm cell division, maturation, or function BPI / GATA3-AS1, LINC00597 antibacterial activity / RNA gene HOXB4, ZSCAN12, SOX21 / PHB2 regulation of cell transcription /transcriptional repression DIRC1, C9orf131, WDR49, GLIPR1L1, unknown LCE3E, FAM163A , KIAA1244, KLRG2 LHCGR receptor for lutropin-choriogonadotropic hormone THRSP/ KLK3 regulation of lipogenesis/ serine-type peptidase activity AKAP2, GSTM2, RECK / OLIG3, ZEB2, enzyme binding / DNA binding/ protein binding HSD3B1, POT1/STON2, LMOD1, FGA ARSB / PPP1R7 arylsulfatase activity/ enzyme regulator activity SLC22A16 transmembrane transport of small molecules UGT3A2 glucuronosyltransferase activity Supplementary Table 4: List of the 333 differentially methylated genes associated to treatment response with both drugs Probe Gene Descriptions CytoMap location cg23178308 PDXK pyridoxine kinase 21q22.3 cg07981910 DAB2IP disabled homolog 2-interacting protein 9q33.1-q33.3 cg00695416 CBR1 carbonyl reductase (NADPH) 1 21q22.13 cg14696870 FCER1A high affinity immunoglobulin epsilon receptor alpha-subunit 1q23 cg19246110 ZNF671 zinc finger protein 671 19q13.43 cg18349835 VIPR2 vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor 2 7q36.3 cg11638200 PRKCQ protein kinase C, theta 10p15 cg03716999 RNF207 RING finger protein 207 1p36.31 cg04920951 GSTP1 glutathione S-transferase P 11q13 cg20261167 SPP1 Bone sialoprotein 1 4q22.1 cg05105069 TCEAL7 TCEA-like protein 7 Xq22.1 cg25802424 IRS2 insulin receptor substrate 2 13q34 cg06825142 DRD4 dopamine D4 receptor 11p15.5 cg05702774 SUCNR1 succinate receptor 1 3q25.1 cg21475402 BCAN chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 7 1q31 cg14998713 ETS1 v-ets erythroblastosis
Recommended publications
  • Zebrafish Disease Models to Study the Pathogenesis of Inherited Manganese Transporter Defects and Provide A
    Zebrafish disease models to study the pathogenesis of inherited manganese transporter defects and provide a route for drug discovery Dr Karin Tuschl University College London PhD Supervisors: Dr Philippa Mills & Prof Stephen Wilson A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London August 2016 Declaration I, Karin Tuschl, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Part of the work of this thesis has been published in the following articles for which copyright clearance has been obtained (see Appendix): - Tuschl K, et al. Manganese and the brain. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013. 110:277- 312. - Tuschl K, et al. Mutations in SLC39A14 disrupt manganese homeostasis and cause childhood-onset parkinsonism-dystonia. Nat Comms. 2016. 7:11601. I confirm that these publications were written by me and may therefore partly overlap with my thesis. 2 Abstract Although manganese is required as an essential trace element excessive amounts are neurotoxic and lead to manganism, an extrapyramidal movement disorder associated with deposition of manganese in the basal ganglia. Recently, we have identified the first inborn error of manganese metabolism caused by mutations in SLC30A10, encoding a manganese transporter facilitating biliary manganese excretion. Treatment is limited to chelation therapy with intravenous disodium calcium edetate which is burdensome due to its route of administration and associated with high socioeconomic costs. Whole exome sequencing in patients with inherited hypermanganesaemia and early- onset parkinsonism-dystonia but absent SLC30A10 mutations identified SLC39A14 as a novel disease gene associated with manganese dyshomeostasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyses of Allele-Specific Gene Expression in Highly Divergent
    ARTICLES Analyses of allele-specific gene expression in highly divergent mouse crosses identifies pervasive allelic imbalance James J Crowley1,10, Vasyl Zhabotynsky1,10, Wei Sun1,2,10, Shunping Huang3, Isa Kemal Pakatci3, Yunjung Kim1, Jeremy R Wang3, Andrew P Morgan1,4,5, John D Calaway1,4,5, David L Aylor1,9, Zaining Yun1, Timothy A Bell1,4,5, Ryan J Buus1,4,5, Mark E Calaway1,4,5, John P Didion1,4,5, Terry J Gooch1,4,5, Stephanie D Hansen1,4,5, Nashiya N Robinson1,4,5, Ginger D Shaw1,4,5, Jason S Spence1, Corey R Quackenbush1, Cordelia J Barrick1, Randal J Nonneman1, Kyungsu Kim2, James Xenakis2, Yuying Xie1, William Valdar1,4, Alan B Lenarcic1, Wei Wang3,9, Catherine E Welsh3, Chen-Ping Fu3, Zhaojun Zhang3, James Holt3, Zhishan Guo3, David W Threadgill6, Lisa M Tarantino7, Darla R Miller1,4,5, Fei Zou2,11, Leonard McMillan3,11, Patrick F Sullivan1,5,7,8,11 & Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena1,4,5,11 Complex human traits are influenced by variation in regulatory DNA through mechanisms that are not fully understood. Because regulatory elements are conserved between humans and mice, a thorough annotation of cis regulatory variants in mice could aid in further characterizing these mechanisms. Here we provide a detailed portrait of mouse gene expression across multiple tissues in a three-way diallel. Greater than 80% of mouse genes have cis regulatory variation. Effects from these variants influence complex traits and usually extend to the human ortholog. Further, we estimate that at least one in every thousand SNPs creates a cis regulatory effect.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Methylation of GHSR, GNG4, HOXD9 and SALL3 Is a Common Epigenetic Alteration in Thymic Carcinoma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 56: 315-326, 2020 DNA methylation of GHSR, GNG4, HOXD9 and SALL3 is a common epigenetic alteration in thymic carcinoma REINA KISHIBUCHI1, KAZUYA KONDO1, SHIHO SOEJIMA1, MITSUHIRO TSUBOI2, KOICHIRO KAJIURA2, YUKIKIYO KAWAKAMI2, NAOYA KAWAKITA2, TORU SAWADA2, HIROAKI TOBA2, MITSUTERU YOSHIDA2, HIROMITSU TAKIZAWA2 and AKIRA TANGOKU2 1Department of Oncological Medical Services, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8509; 2Department of Thoracic, Endocrine Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan Received August 17, 2019; Accepted October 25, 2019 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4915 Abstract. Thymic epithelial tumors comprise thymoma, promoter methylation of the 4 genes was not significantly thymic carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus. higher in advanced-stage tumors than in early-stage tumors in Recent studies have revealed that the incidence of somatic all thymic epithelial tumors. Among the 4 genes, relapse-free non‑synonymous mutations is significantly higher in thymic survival was significantly worse in tumors with a higher DNA carcinoma than in thymoma. However, limited information methylation than in those with a lower DNA methylation in all is currently available on epigenetic alterations in these types thymic epithelial tumors. Moreover, relapse-free survival was of cancer. In this study, we thus performed genome-wide significantly worse in thymomas with a higher DNA methyla- screening of aberrantly methylated CpG islands in thymoma tion of HOXD9 and SALL3 than in those with a lower DNA and thymic carcinoma using Illumina HumanMethylation450 methylation. On the whole, the findings of this study indicated K BeadChip. We identified 92 CpG islands significantly that the promoter methylation of cancer-related genes was hypermethylated in thymic carcinoma in relation to thymoma significantly higher in thymic carcinoma than in thymoma and and selected G protein subunit gamma 4 (GNG4), growth the thymus.
    [Show full text]
  • The G Protein-Coupled Receptor Subset of the Dog Genome Is More Similar
    BMC Genomics BioMed Central Research article Open Access The G protein-coupled receptor subset of the dog genome is more similar to that in humans than rodents Tatjana Haitina1, Robert Fredriksson1, Steven M Foord2, Helgi B Schiöth*1 and David E Gloriam*2 Address: 1Department of Neuroscience, Functional Pharmacology, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 593, 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden and 2GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, New Frontiers Science Park, 3rd Avenue, Harlow CM19 5AW, UK Email: Tatjana Haitina - [email protected]; Robert Fredriksson - [email protected]; Steven M Foord - [email protected]; Helgi B Schiöth* - [email protected]; David E Gloriam* - [email protected] * Corresponding authors Published: 15 January 2009 Received: 20 August 2008 Accepted: 15 January 2009 BMC Genomics 2009, 10:24 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-24 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/10/24 © 2009 Haitina et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The dog is an important model organism and it is considered to be closer to humans than rodents regarding metabolism and responses to drugs. The close relationship between humans and dogs over many centuries has lead to the diversity of the canine species, important genetic discoveries and an appreciation of the effects of old age in another species. The superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is one of the largest gene families in most mammals and the most exploited in terms of drug discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Human and Mouse CD Marker Handbook Human and Mouse CD Marker Key Markers - Human Key Markers - Mouse
    Welcome to More Choice CD Marker Handbook For more information, please visit: Human bdbiosciences.com/eu/go/humancdmarkers Mouse bdbiosciences.com/eu/go/mousecdmarkers Human and Mouse CD Marker Handbook Human and Mouse CD Marker Key Markers - Human Key Markers - Mouse CD3 CD3 CD (cluster of differentiation) molecules are cell surface markers T Cell CD4 CD4 useful for the identification and characterization of leukocytes. The CD CD8 CD8 nomenclature was developed and is maintained through the HLDA (Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens) workshop started in 1982. CD45R/B220 CD19 CD19 The goal is to provide standardization of monoclonal antibodies to B Cell CD20 CD22 (B cell activation marker) human antigens across laboratories. To characterize or “workshop” the antibodies, multiple laboratories carry out blind analyses of antibodies. These results independently validate antibody specificity. CD11c CD11c Dendritic Cell CD123 CD123 While the CD nomenclature has been developed for use with human antigens, it is applied to corresponding mouse antigens as well as antigens from other species. However, the mouse and other species NK Cell CD56 CD335 (NKp46) antibodies are not tested by HLDA. Human CD markers were reviewed by the HLDA. New CD markers Stem Cell/ CD34 CD34 were established at the HLDA9 meeting held in Barcelona in 2010. For Precursor hematopoetic stem cell only hematopoetic stem cell only additional information and CD markers please visit www.hcdm.org. Macrophage/ CD14 CD11b/ Mac-1 Monocyte CD33 Ly-71 (F4/80) CD66b Granulocyte CD66b Gr-1/Ly6G Ly6C CD41 CD41 CD61 (Integrin b3) CD61 Platelet CD9 CD62 CD62P (activated platelets) CD235a CD235a Erythrocyte Ter-119 CD146 MECA-32 CD106 CD146 Endothelial Cell CD31 CD62E (activated endothelial cells) Epithelial Cell CD236 CD326 (EPCAM1) For Research Use Only.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION of Hur in RENAL STRESS
    TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF HuR IN RENAL STRESS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sudha Suman Govindaraju Graduate Program in Biochemistry The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Beth S. Lee, Ph.D., Advisor Dr. Kathleen Boris-Lawrie, Ph.D. Dr. Sissy M. Jhiang, Ph.D. Dr. Arthur R. Strauch, Ph.D Abstract HuR is a ubiquitously expressed RNA-binding protein that affects the post- transcriptional life of thousands of cellular mRNAs by regulating transcript stability and translation. HuR can post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression and modulate cellular responses to stress, differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, inflammation, and the immune response. It is an important mediator of survival during cellular stress, but when inappropriately expressed, can promote oncogenic transformation. Not surprisingly, the expression of HuR itself is tightly regulated at multiple transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Previous studies demonstrated the existence of two alternate HuR transcripts that differ in their 5’ untranslated regions and have markedly different translatabilities. These forms were also found to be reciprocally expressed following cellular stress in kidney proximal tubule cell lines, and the shorter, more readily translatable variant was shown to be regulated by Smad 1/5/8 pathway and bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) signaling. In this study, the factors that promote transcription of the longer alternate form were identified. NF-κB was shown to be important for expression of the long HuR mRNA, as was a newly identified region with potential for binding the Sp/KLF families of transcription factors.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICLES Fibroblast Growth Factors 1, 2, 17, and 19 Are The
    0031-3998/07/6103-0267 PEDIATRIC RESEARCH Vol. 61, No. 3, 2007 Copyright © 2007 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc. Printed in U.S.A. ARTICLES Fibroblast Growth Factors 1, 2, 17, and 19 Are the Predominant FGF Ligands Expressed in Human Fetal Growth Plate Cartilage PAVEL KREJCI, DEBORAH KRAKOW, PERTCHOUI B. MEKIKIAN, AND WILLIAM R. WILCOX Medical Genetics Institute [P.K., D.K., P.B.M., W.R.W.], Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology [D.K.] and Department of Pediatrics [W.R.W.], UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095 ABSTRACT: Fibroblast growth factors (FGF) regulate bone growth, (G380R) or TD (K650E) mutations (4–6). When expressed at but their expression in human cartilage is unclear. Here, we deter- physiologic levels, FGFR3-G380R required, like its wild-type mined the expression of entire FGF family in human fetal growth counterpart, ligand for activation (7). Similarly, in vitro cul- plate cartilage. Using reverse transcriptase PCR, the transcripts for tivated human TD chondrocytes as well as chondrocytes FGF1, 2, 5, 8–14, 16–19, and 21 were found. However, only FGF1, isolated from Fgfr3-K644M mice had an identical time course 2, 17, and 19 were detectable at the protein level. By immunohisto- of Fgfr3 activation compared with wild-type chondrocytes and chemistry, FGF17 and 19 were uniformly expressed within the showed no receptor activation in the absence of ligand (8,9). growth plate. In contrast, FGF1 was found only in proliferating and hypertrophic chondrocytes whereas FGF2 localized predominantly to Despite the importance of the FGF ligand for activation of the resting and proliferating cartilage.
    [Show full text]
  • TBX15/Mir-152/KIF2C Pathway Regulates Breast Cancer Doxorubicin Resistance Via Preventing PKM2 Ubiquitination
    TBX15/miR-152/KIF2C Pathway Regulates Breast Cancer Doxorubicin Resistance via Preventing PKM2 Ubiquitination Cheng-Fei Jiang Nanjing Medical University Yun-Xia Xie Zhengzhou University Ying-Chen Qian Nanjing Medical University Min Wang Nanjing Medical University Ling-Zhi Liu Thomas Jefferson University - Center City Campus: Thomas Jefferson University Yong-Qian Shu Nanjing Medical University Xiao-Ming Bai ( [email protected] ) Nanjing Medical University Bing-Hua Jiang Thomas Jefferson University Research Keywords: TBX15, miR-152, KIF2C, PKM2, Doxorubicin resistance, breast cancer Posted Date: December 28th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-130874/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/29 Abstract Background Chemoresistance is a critical risk problem for breast cancer treatment. However, mechanisms by which chemoresistance arises remains to be elucidated. The expression of T-box transcription factor 15 (TBX- 15) was found downregulated in some cancer tissues. However, role and mechanism of TBX15 in breast cancer chemoresistance is unknown. Here we aimed to identify the effects and mechanisms of TBX15 in doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer. Methods As measures of Drug sensitivity analysis, MTT and IC50 assays were used in DOX-resistant breast cancer cells. ECAR and OCR assays were used to analyze the glycolysis level, while Immunoblotting and Immunouorescence assays were used to analyze the autophagy levels in vitro. By using online prediction software, luciferase reporter assays, co-Immunoprecipitation, Western blotting analysis and experimental animals models, we further elucidated the mechanisms. Results We found TBX15 expression levels were decreased in Doxorubicin (DOX)-resistant breast cancer cells.
    [Show full text]
  • FGF14 Regulates Presynaptic Ca2+ Channels and Synaptic Transmission
    Cell Reports Article FGF14 Regulates Presynaptic Ca2+ Channels and Synaptic Transmission Haidun Yan,1,3 Juan L. Pablo,2,3 and Geoffrey S. Pitt1,2,3,* 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA 2Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA 3Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. SUMMARY data pinpointed FGF14 as the locus for spinocerebellar ataxia 27 (SCA27). Fibroblast growth factor homologous factors (FHFs) Focus on FHF regulation of neuronal excitability began when are not growth factors, but instead bind to voltage- Fgf14–/– mice showed ataxia (Wang et al., 2002), providing + gated Na channels (NaV) and regulate their function. a basis for exploring the implications of a linkage analysis that Mutations in FGF14, an FHF that is the locus for identified a F150S missense mutation in a ‘‘b’’ splice variant of F150S F145S spinocerebellar ataxia 27 (SCA27), are believed to FGF14 (FGF14b ; termed FGF14 in some studies that be pathogenic because of a dominant-negative used numbering based on the alternatively spliced FGF14a variant) as the etiology of the autosomal-dominant SCA27 in reduction of Na currents in cerebellar granule cells. V an extended Dutch family (van Swieten et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set
    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
    [Show full text]
  • Cd1b Tetramers Bind T Cell Receptors to Identify a Mycobacterial
    Published August 1, 2011 Brief Definitive Report CD1b tetramers bind T cell receptors to identify a mycobacterial glycolipid- reactive T cell repertoire in humans Anne G. Kasmar,1 Ildiko van Rhijn,1,2 Tan-Yun Cheng,1 Marie Turner,3 Chetan Seshadri,1 Andre Schiefner,4 Ravi C. Kalathur,4 John W. Annand,1 Annemieke de Jong,1 John Shires,5 Luis Leon,1 Michael Brenner,1 Ian A. Wilson,4 John D. Altman,5 and D. Branch Moody1 1Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 2Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, Netherlands 3Tuberculosis Treatment Unit, Lemuel Shattuck Hospital, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 4Department of Molecular Biology and Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037 Downloaded from 5Emory Vaccine Center, Atlanta, GA 30329 Microbial lipids activate T cells by binding directly to CD1 and T cell receptors (TCRs) or by indirect effects on antigen-presenting cells involving induction of lipid autoantigens, CD1 transcription, or cytokine release. To distinguish among direct and indirect mechanisms, we developed fluorescent human CD1b tetramers and measured T cell staining. CD1b tetramer staining of T cells requires glucose monomycolate (GMM) antigens, is specific for TCR jem.rupress.org structure, and is blocked by a recombinant clonotypic TCR comprised of TRAV17 and TRBV4-1, proving that CD1b–glycolipid complexes bind the TCR. GMM-loaded tetramers brightly stain a small subpopulation of blood-derived cells from humans infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, providing direct detection of a CD1b-reactive T cell reper- toire.
    [Show full text]