An Analysis of the Sources of Intepretation in the Commentaries of Al-Tabari, Al-Zamakhshari, Al-Razi, Al-Qurtubi, and Ibn Kathir
AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOURCES OF INTEPRETATION IN THE COMMENTARIES OF AL-TABARI, AL-ZAMAKHSHARI, AL-RAZI, AL-QURTUBI, AND IBN KATHIR Ismail Lala INTRODUCTION I propose, in this study, to scrutinise the sources of the tafsirs (sing. tafsir, pl. tafasir) of Abu Ja‘far Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (d. 310/923), Abu al-Qasim Mahmud ibn ‘Umar al-Zamakhshari (d. 538/1143-4), Fakhr al- Din Muhammad ibn ‘Umar al-Razi (d. 606/1209-10), Abu ‘Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Qurtubi (d. 671-1273), and ‘Imad al-Din Isma’il ibn ‘Umar ibn Kathir (d. 774/1373). All of these exegetes outline, in their respective introductions, whom they consider to be competent commentators of the Qur’an. Al-Tabari affirms the status of the Companions of the Prophet as being the foremost in the interpretation of the Qur’an. Many accounts are related about the profundity of their understanding of the divine text. He writes, Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn al-Husayn ibn Shaqiq al- Marwazi informed us, “I heard my father say, ‘al-Husayn ibn Waqid told us, ‘al-A‘mash told us on the authority of Shaqiq, on the authority of Ibn Mas‘ud, he said, ‘If someone among us memorised ten verses, they would not proceed beyond them (lam yujawizuhunna) until he knew their meaning, and acted upon them.’”1 Al-Tabari shortly names some leading sources. Ibn ‘Abbas and Ibn Mas‘ud, somewhat predictably, head the list, after which Mujahid, al- Dahhak, al-Sha‘bi, al-Suddi, and Qatada are mentioned. Their inferiority to Ibn ‘Abbas and Ibn Mas‘ud, however, is explicitly highlighted.2 It is evident from this roster that, according to al-Tabari, the first four generations’ interpretation of the Qur’an is the most correct and as such, they should be the ones an exgete turns to in his commentary.
[Show full text]