Fast Facts Tournament History Singles Doubles Match Schedule

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fast Facts Tournament History Singles Doubles Match Schedule The 2019 Nitto ATP Finals Media Guide 04 has been prepared to assist you in covering this year’s championship FAST with updated biographies and FACTS statistics. TOURNAMENT HISTORY Official Website 06 www.NittoATPFinals.com SINGLES Champions & Finalists 06 Titles, Match Win Leaders 07 Player History 12 Tournament Results 16 24 DOUBLES Champions & Finalists 24 CREDITS Titles, Match Win Leaders 25 Produced by Tournament Results 27 Greg Sharko Statistical Assistance Chris Giles Editorial Assistance Florian Gardetto 35 Artwork MATCH Cassie Jacobs Photography SCHEDULE Getty Images, Wonderhatch.co.uk 3 FAST FACTS Title: Nitto ATP Finals Dates: 10-17 November 2019 Location: The O2, London Format: Round robin format with 8 players/teams divided into two groups of four. The seeds will be determined based on the ATP Ranking as of Monday, Nov. 4. All singles matches shall be the best of three tie-break sets, including the final. All doubles matches shall be two sets (no ad) and a Match Tie-break. Draw: The top seed for singles will be placed in group Group Andre Agassi, for doubles in group Max Mirnyi. The second seed for singles will be placed in group Bjorn Borg, for doubles in group Jonas Bjorkman. Player/teams seeded 3 and 4, 5 and 6, 7 and 8, will then be drawn in pairs with the first drawn placed in for singles in group Andre Agassi, and for doubles in group Max Mirnyi. The round robin will determine the four players/teams for the semi-finals with the format thereafter being an elimination competition. The winner of each group (best overall record) will be placed in separate semi-final brackets; with the top player/team for singles in group Andre Agassi and for doubles in group Max Mirnyi playing the runner-up, for singles in group Bjorn Borg, for doubles in group Jonas Bjorkman, and vice-versa. If two or more players/teams are tied after the round robin matches, the ties will be broken by the Semi-final Qualifying Procedure (see next page). All singles matches will be the best of three tie-break sets. All doubles matches will be two sets (no ad) and match tie-break. Prize Money: US$ 9,000,000 Singles Doubles Team Alternates: US$ 116,000 US$ 40,000 Participation Fee: US$ 215,000 * US$ 103,000 * Round Robin Win: US$ 215,000 US$ 40,000 Semi-final Win: US$ 657,000 US$ 106,000 Final Win: US$ 1,354,000 US$ 204,000 Undefeated Winner: US$ 2,871,000 US$ 533,000 *Pro-rated on a per match basis: US$ 116,000=1 match; US$ 40,000=1 match; US$ 161,000=2 matches; US$ 76,000=2 matches; US$ 215,000=3 matches; US$ 103,000=3 matches Round Robin Win: 200 points ATP RANKINGS Semi-final Win: 400 points BREAKDOWN Final Win: 500 points Undefeated Winner: 1500 points Surface: Hard (Acrylic on Wood) Official Ball: DUNLOP/ATP Stadium Court Capacity: 17,800 2018 / Overall Attendance: 243,819 / 2,561,084 (10-year total) Trophy: Produced by Thomas Lyte Tournament Chairman: Chris Kermode Managing Director: Adam Hogg Supervisor: Carlos Sanches Referee: Gerry Armstrong Chair Umpires: Carlos Bernardes (BRA), Mohamed Lahyani (SWE), Renaud Lichtenstein (FRA), Ali Nili (USA) Review Official: Blaze Trifunovski Physiotherapists: Clay Sniteman, Alejandro Resnicoff PR: Nicola Arzani, Fabienne Benoit, Martin Dagahs, Nanette Duxin 4 FAST FACTS SEMIFINAL QUALIFYING PROCEDURE The final standings of each group shall be determined by the first of the following methods that apply: a) Greatest number of wins; b) Greatest number of matches played; Comment: 2-1 won-loss record beats a 2-0 won-loss record; a 1-2 record beats a 1-0 record. c) Head-to-head results if only two (2) players are tied, d) If three (3) players are tied, then: i) If three (3) players each have one (1) win, a player having played less than all three (3) matches is automatically eliminated and the player advancing to the single elimination competition is the winner of the match-up of the two (2) players tied with 1-2 records; or ii) Highest percentage of sets won; or iii) Highest percentage of games won; or iv) The player positions on the ATP Rankings as of the Monday after the last ATP World Tour tournament of the calendar year. v) If (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) produce one (1) superior player (first place), or one (1) inferior player (third place), and the two (2) remaining players are tied, the tie between those two (2) players shall be broken by head-to-head record. Comment 1: 1 player has 3 wins and the other 3 players have 1 win. Of the 3 players with 1 win, 1 player has only played in 2 matches while the other 2 players have played 3 matches. The player who has only played 2 matches is eliminated and then the 2 remaining players revert back to head-to-head results with the winner of their match advancing to the semi-finals. Comment 2: 1 player has 3 wins and the other 3 players have 1 win and they all have played 3 matches. The tie-break for % of sets won has 1 player with a better % than the other two. This player advances to the semi-final round. Comment 3: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, they are ordered by their % of sets won. This produces a 1, 2 & 3 order and the players finishing 1 and 2 move to the semi-final round and the player finishing 3 in % of sets won is eliminated. The player with the best % of sets won is the winner of the group. Comment 4: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, 1 player’s sets won-loss is 5-2 for 71.43%; the other 2 players both have a 4-3 record in sets for 57.14%. In this case there is 1 superior player (71.43%) and the remaining 2 players are tied; it now reverts to the head to head result of the 2 remaining players with the win- ning player advancing as group runner-up. Comment 5: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, 2 have set won-loss records of 5-3 (62.5%) while the other player is 4-3 (57.14%). In this case we have 1 inferior player (57.14%) and he is eliminated. The remaining two players both advance to the semi-finals with the winner of their head-to-head match advancing as the group winner. Comment 6: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, all have played 3 matches and all 3 have set won-loss records of 5-4 (55.56%). In this case we move to % of games won. The % of games won breaks down like this: 44-40 for 52.38%, 45-43 for 51.14% and 44-43 for 50.57%. This produces a 1, 2 and 3 order of the group and the number 1 player in % of games won is the group winner while the player finishing 2nd in % of games won advances to the semi- finals as the group runner-up. The player with the 3rd best % of games won is eliminated. In applying the tie-breaking procedures, a conduct default or retirement shall count as a straight-set win or loss. However, games won or lost in matches with the defaulting or retiring player shall not be counted in the application of subsection d) (iii) above. A player who retires during the round robin because of illness or injury may continue in the competition if it is approved by the tournament Doctor. Comment: This prevents a scenario where a player knows he only needs to win 1 set to qualify for the semi-finals from retiring once he has won a set. Any player who is defaulted pursuant to the ATP Code during the round robin competition shall be defaulted from all other matches in the Championship and ATP default provisions shall apply, except for the following circumstances: a) The loss of physical condition; or b) Dress and Equipment. Any player who withdraws from any round robin match after the first round shall not be eligible for the single elimination competition. 5 TOURNAMENT HISTORY SINGLES CHAMPIONS & FINALISTS SEASON LOCATION CHAMPION (SEED) WL FINALIST (SEED) SCORE TIME 2018 London Alexander Zverev (5) 4-1 Novak Djokovic (1) 64 63 1:20 2017 London Grigor Dimitrov (6) 5-0 David Goffin (7) 75 46 63 2:30 2016 London Andy Murray (1) 5-0 Novak Djokovic (2) 63 64 1:43 2015 London Novak Djokovic (1) 4-1 Roger Federer (3) 63 64 1:21 2014 London Novak Djokovic (1) 4-0 Roger Federer (2) Walkover (Fed. back injury) N/A 2013 London Novak Djokovic (2) 5-0 Rafael Nadal (1) 63 64 1:36 2012 London Novak Djokovic (1) 5-0 Roger Federer (2) 76(6) 75 2:15 2011 London Roger Federer (4) 5-0 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (6) 63 67(6) 63 2:19 2010 London Roger Federer (2) 5-0 Rafael Nadal (1) 63 36 61 1:38 2009 London Nikolay Davydenko (7) #4-1 Juan Martin del Potro (5) 63 64 1:24 2008 Shanghai Novak Djokovic (3) 4-1 Nikolay Davydenko (5) 61 75 1:43 2007 Shanghai Roger Federer (1) #4-1 David Ferrer (6) 62 63 62 1:39 2006 Shanghai Roger Federer (1) 5-0 James Blake (8) 60 63 64 1:37 2005 Shanghai David Nalbandian (12) #4-1 Roger Federer (1) 67(4) 67(11) 62 61 76(3) 4:33 2004 Houston Roger Federer (1) 5-0 Lleyton Hewitt (3) 63 62 1:07 2003 Houston Roger Federer (3) 5-0 Andre Agassi (5) 63 60 64 1:36 2002 Shanghai Lleyton Hewitt (1) 4-1 Juan Carlos Ferrero (4) 75 75 26 26 64 3:51 2001 Sydney Lleyton Hewitt (2) 5-0 Sebastien Grosjean (7) 63 63 64 1:55 2000 Lisbon Gustavo Kuerten (2) #4-1 Andre Agassi (8) 64 64 64 2:06 1999 Hanover Pete Sampras (5) 4-1 Andre Agassi (1) 61 75 64 1:45 1998 Hanover Alex Corretja (6) 4-1 Carlos Moya (5) 36 36 75 63 75 4:01 1997 Hanover Pete Sampras (1) #4-1 Yevgeny Kafelnikov (6) 63 62 62 1:32 1996 Hanover Pete Sampras (1) 4-1 Boris Becker (6) 36 76(5) 76(4) 67(11) 64 4:00 1995 Frankfurt Boris Becker
Recommended publications
  • 2016 Ucla Men's Tennis
    2016 UCLA MEN’S TENNIS All-Time Letter Winners (1956-2015) Andre Ranadive ......................................2007 A F L Dave Reddie .......................................... 1962 Haythem Abid ........................2006-07-08-10 Buff Farrow ............................1986-87-88-89 Chris Lam ....................................2003-04-05 Martin Redlicki .......................................2015 Hassan Akmal ....................................... 1999 Mark Ferriera ....................................1985-86 Jimmy Landes ......................................... 1974 Dave Reed ..................................1963-64-65 Jim Allen ............................................1968-69 Zack Fleishman ..................................... 1999 John Larson .......................... 1992-93-94-95 Horace Reid ............................................ 1974 Jake Fleming ............................... 2009-10-11 Sebastien LeBlanc ...........................1993-94 Vince Allegre ............................... 1996-97-98 Travis Rettenmaier ...........................2000-01 Peter Fleming .........................................1976 Evan Lee ..................................... 2010-11-12 Elio Alvarez ................................. 1969-70-71 Sergio Rico ............................................. 1994 Allen Fox ...................................... 1959-60-61 Jong-Min Lee ....................................1999-00 Stanislav Arsonov ...................................2007 Mark Rifenbark .......................................1981
    [Show full text]
  • DELRAY BEACH ATP 250 CHAMPIONS (Thru 2020)
    (DELRAY BEACH ATP 250 CHAMPIONS (thru 2020 SINGLES DOUBLES ATP Tour Singles REILLY OPELKA (USA) d. Yosihito Nishioka (JPN) 7-5, 6-7(4), 6-2 2020 ATP Tour Doubles BOB & MIKE BRYAN (USA) d. Luke Bambridge (GBR) & Ben MCLachlan (JPN) 3-6, 7-5, 10-5 ATP Champions Tour TEAM EUROPE (Haas, Ferrer, Baghdatis) d. Team Americas (Blake, Levine, Spadea) 5-3 ATP Tour Singles RADU ALBOT (MDA) d. DANIEL EVANS (GBR) 3-6, 6-3, 7-6(7) 2019 ATP Tour Doubles BOB & MIKE BRYAN (USA) d. Ken & Neal Skupski (GBR) 7-6(5), 6-4 ATP Champions Tour TEAM WORLD (Haas, Henman, Levine) d. Team Americas (Ferreira, Gambill, Gonzalez) ATP Tour Singles FRANCES TIAFOE (USA) d. Peter Gojowczyk (GER) 6-1, 6-4 ATP Tour Doubles JACK SOCK (USA) & JACKSON WITHROW (USA) d. Nicholas Monroe (USA) & John-Patrick Smith (AUS) 4-6, 6-4, 10-8 2018 ATP Champions Tour TEAM INTERNATIONAL (Gonzalez, Rusedski, Levine) d. Team USA (McEnroe, Fish, Gambill) 6-2 ATP Tour Singles JACK SOCK (USA) d. Milos Raonic (CAN) w/o ATP Tour Doubles RAJEEV RAM (USA) & RAVEN KLAASEN (RSA) d. Treat Huey (PHI) & Max Mirnyi (BLR) 7-5, 7-5 2017 ATP Champions Tour TEAM USA (Blake, Fish, Spadea) d. Team International (Gonzalez, Grosjean, Pernfors) 6-3 ATP Tour Singles SAM QUERREY (USA) d. Rajeev Ram (USA) 6-4, 7-6(6) ATP Tour Doubles OLIVER MARACH (AUT) & FABRICE MARTIN (FRA) d. Bob & Mike Bryan (USA) 3-6, 7-6(7), 13-11 2016 ATP Champions Tour TEAM USA (Blake, Fish, Krickstein) d.
    [Show full text]
  • VICTOR ESTRELLA BURGOS (Dom) DATE of BIRTH: August 2, 1980 | BORN: Santiago, Dominican Republic | RESIDENCE: Santiago, Dominican Republic
    VICTOR ESTRELLA BURGOS (dOm) DATE OF BIRTH: August 2, 1980 | BORN: Santiago, Dominican Republic | RESIDENCE: Santiago, Dominican Republic Turned Pro: 2002 EmiRATES ATP RAnkinG HiSTORy (W-L) Height: 5’8” (1.73m) 2014: 78 (9-10) 2009: 263 (4-0) 2004: T1447 (3-1) Weight: 170lbs (77kg) 2013: 143 (2-1) 2008: 239 (2-2) 2003: T1047 (3-1) Career Win-Loss: 39-23 2012: 256 (6-0) 2007: 394 (3-0) 2002: T1049 (0-0) Plays: Right-handed 2011: 177 (2-1) 2006: 567 (2-2) 2001: N/R (2-0) Two-handed backhand 2010: 219 (0-3) 2005: N/R (1-2) Career Prize Money: $635,950 8 2014 HiGHLiGHTS Career Singles Titles/ Finalist: 0/0 Prize money: $346,518 Career Win-Loss vs. Top 10: 0-1 Matches won-lost: 9-10 (singles),4-5 (doubles) Challenger: 28-11 (singles), 4-7 (doubles) Highest Emirates ATP Ranking: 65 (October 6, 2014) Singles semi-finalist: Bogota Highest Emirates ATP Doubles Doubles semi-finals: Atlanta (w/Barrientos) Ranking: 145 (May 25, 2009) 2014 IN REVIEW • In 2008, qualified for 1st ATP tournament in Cincinnati (l. to • Became 1st player from Dominican Republic to finish a season Verdasco in 1R). Won 2 Futures titles in Dominican Republic in Top 100 Emirates ATP Rankings after climbing 65 places • In 2007, won 5 Futures events in U.S., Nicaragua and 3 on home during year soil in Dominican Republic • Reached maiden ATP World Tour SF in Bogota in July, defeating • In 2006, reached 3 Futures finals in 3-week stretch in the U.S., No.
    [Show full text]
  • FEATURED MEN's MATCHES – in Order of Play by Court
    2015 US OPEN Flushing Meadows, New York, USA | August 31 – September 13, 2015 Draw Size: S-128, D-64 | $42.3 million | Hard www.usopen.org DAY FIVE NOTES | Friday, September 4, 2015 FEATURED MEN’S MATCHES – In Order of Play by Court Arthur Ashe Stadium: (1) Novak Djokovic (SRB) vs. (25) Andreas Seppi (ITA) Djokovic Leads 10-0 (8) Rafael Nadal (ESP) vs (32) Fabio Fognini (ITA) Nadal Leads 5-2 Louis Armstrong Stadium: (9) Marin Cilic (CRO) vs. Mikhail Kukushkin (KAZ) Tied 1-1 (7) David Ferrer (ESP) vs. (27) Jeremy Chardy (FRA) Ferrer Leads 7-1 Grandstand: (19) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (FRA) vs. Sergiy Stakhovsky (UKR) Tsonga Leads 4-0 (10) Milos Raonic (CAN) vs. (18) Feliciano Lopez (ESP) Tied 3-3 Court 17: (26) Tommy Robredo (ESP) vs. Benoit Paire (FRA) Paire Leads 2-1 (14) David Goffin (BEL) vs. (23) Roberto Bautista Agut (ESP) Bautista Agut Leads 1-0 DAY FIVE HIGHLIGHTS The third round of the US Open begins on Friday with three players in action who have yet to be broken during the tournament: No. 1 Novak Djokovic (24 service games), No. 10 seed Milos Raonic (36 games) and No. 19 seed Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (26 games). Also on the schedule are two-time champion Rafael Nadal, two-time semi- finalist David Ferrer and ‘13 quarter-finalist Tommy Robredo, who are three of six Spaniards in the third round. On Ashe, Djokovic takes a near-perfect record against Italian opponents (30-1) into his 3R match with No. 25 seed Andreas Seppi. The 2011 US Open champion is 10-0 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Guide Template
    MOST CHAMPIONSHIP TITLES T O Following are the records for championships achieved in all of the five major events constituting U R I N the U.S. championships since 1881. (Active players are in bold.) N F A O M E MOST TOTAL TITLES, ALL EVENTS N T MEN Name No. Years (first to last title) 1. Bill Tilden 16 1913-29 F G A 2. Richard Sears 13 1881-87 R C O I L T3. Bob Bryan 8 2003-12 U I T N T3. John McEnroe 8 1979-89 Y D & T3. Neale Fraser 8 1957-60 S T3. Billy Talbert 8 1942-48 T3. George M. Lott Jr. 8 1928-34 T8. Jack Kramer 7 1940-47 T8. Vincent Richards 7 1918-26 T8. Bill Larned 7 1901-11 A E C V T T8. Holcombe Ward 7 1899-1906 E I N V T I T S I OPEN ERA E & T1. Bob Bryan 8 2003-12 S T1. John McEnroe 8 1979-89 T3. Todd Woodbridge 6 1990-2003 T3. Jimmy Connors 6 1974-83 T5. Roger Federer 5 2004-08 T5. Max Mirnyi 5 1998-2013 H I T5. Pete Sampras 5 1990-2002 S T T5. Marty Riessen 5 1969-80 O R Y C H A P M A P S I T O N S R S E T C A O T I R S D T I S C S & R P E L C A O Y R E D R Bill Tilden John McEnroe S * All Open Era records include only titles won in 1968 and beyond 169 WOMEN Name No.
    [Show full text]
  • SCOREBOARD Venus Has Been Delayed Again, Until Late September, While ' »1 • W a T 'R David Wheatoa Excelsior, Minn., Def
    20—MANCHESTER HERALD. Tuesday, August 28, 1990 Calhoun first college coach to have own trading card WEDNESDAY in the set and chose Calhoun. He got By DAVID A. PHILLIPS a first-round selection of the New his intention to be placed in the Lionel Simmons and Bo Kimble of basketball card. Printed on high in touch with the Husky coach’s Jersey Nets, also is included. Waterbury Republican NBA draft he is no longer governed Loyola Marymount. grade stock, the card has a has a LOCAL NEWS INSIDE agent in Hartford and after Calhoun “Vk^en dealers and collectors in by the NCAA. Besides ^ top draft possibilities. glossy front with a color action checked out Star Pics, he gave the New England saw our checklist of “Really, he’s in limbo,” said Star Pics will include cards for photo of each player — or in WATERBURY (AP) — Just go-ahead to allow them to use his players, we had hundreds of calls Rylko. “They have no money, so David Robinson, Pervis Ellison and Calhoun’s case, coach — bordered when you thought you’d seen Jim picture and namesake. because of Jim Calhoun and Tate what we did is track down every by a number of basketballs. Instead ■ Coventry Lake limits sought. ilanrl|f0lpr Danny Ferry, each of which will Calhoun’s face on everything im­ George.” player and agent we wanted to print bear a “Flashback!” stripe in the of a myriad of statistics so small that aginable, think again. “He’s represented by Peter Rois- Star Pics also had to go through a cards of and got an authorization upper right comer.
    [Show full text]
  • Game, Set, Watched: Governance, Social Control and Surveillance in Professional Tennis
    GAME, SET, WATCHED: GOVERNANCE, SOCIAL CONTROL AND SURVEILLANCE IN PROFESSIONAL TENNIS By Marie-Pier Guay A thesis submitted to the Department of Sociology in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada November, 2013 Copyright © Marie-Pier Guay, 2013 Abstract Contrary to many major sporting leagues such as the NHL, NFL, NBA, and MLB, or the Olympic Games as a whole, the professional tennis industry has not been individually scrutinized in terms of governance, social control, and surveillance practices. This thesis presents an in-depth account of the major governing bodies of the professional tennis circuit with the aim of examining how they govern, control, constrain, and practice surveillance on tennis athletes and their bodies. Foucault’s major theoretical concepts of disciplinary power, governmentality, and bio-power are found relevant today and can be enhanced by Rose’s ethico-politics model and Haggerty and Ericson’s surveillant assemblage. However, it is also shown how Foucault, Rose, and Haggerty and Ericson’s different accounts of “modes of governing” perpetuate sociological predicaments of professional tennis players within late capitalism. These modes of surveillance are founded on a meritocracy based on the ATP and WTA rankings systems. A player’s ranking affects how he or she is governed, surveilled, controlled, and even punished. Despite ostensibly promoting tennis athletes’ health protection and wellbeing, the systems of surveillance, governance, and control rely on a biased and capitalistically-driven meritocracy that actually jeopardizes athletes’ health and contributes to social class divisions, socio- economic inequalities, gender discrimination, and media pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry News
    IndustryNews Industry News Information to help you run your business TENNIS FORUM 2019 NYC EDUCATION USPTA World Conference Heads to Las Vegas Sept. 22-26 12th Annual TIA Tennis Forum Set for Aug. 26 in New York The 12th Annual TIA Tennis Forum will be held on Monday, Aug. 26, on the Ballroom Level of the Grand Hyatt New York City, from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. The TIA Tennis Forum will present the latest news about the state of the tennis industry, including participation, market- place trends, grassroots initiatives, updates from TIA, ITF and USTA leadership, and more. Also joining this year’s event will be Andrew LaFiosca of Nielsen Sports, who will share player and consumer insights, and Tom Cove, executive director of the Sports & Fitness Industry Association, with insights on sports and fi tness trends. A new feature at this year’s forum is the “Discovery Challenge,” an online competi- tion designed to showcase innovation and solutions around a problem facing the ten- nis industry—in this case, the “retention of tennis players.” The challenge will be moder- he USPTA is heading to The USPTA's 2019 ated by Carlos Salum, president of Salum World Conference Las Vegas for its 2019 heads to Vegas for the International Resources. He will be joined by World Conference, from fi rst time since 2006. Lena Belogolova, a behavioral science expert Sept. 22-26, at the and former manager at Facebook. The Westgate Las Vegas Discovery Challenge is designed to be an Resort and Casino. Hundreds of tennis professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROGER FEDERER STORY Quest for Perfection
    THE ROGER FEDERER STORY Quest For Perfection RENÉ STAUFFER THE ROGER FEDERER STORY Quest For Perfection RENÉ STAUFFER New Chapter Press Cover and interior design: Emily Brackett, Visible Logic Originally published in Germany under the title “Das Tennis-Genie” by Pendo Verlag. © Pendo Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Munich and Zurich, 2006 Published across the world in English by New Chapter Press, www.newchapterpressonline.com ISBN 094-2257-391 978-094-2257-397 Printed in the United States of America Contents From The Author . v Prologue: Encounter with a 15-year-old...................ix Introduction: No One Expected Him....................xiv PART I From Kempton Park to Basel . .3 A Boy Discovers Tennis . .8 Homesickness in Ecublens ............................14 The Best of All Juniors . .21 A Newcomer Climbs to the Top ........................30 New Coach, New Ways . 35 Olympic Experiences . 40 No Pain, No Gain . 44 Uproar at the Davis Cup . .49 The Man Who Beat Sampras . 53 The Taxi Driver of Biel . 57 Visit to the Top Ten . .60 Drama in South Africa...............................65 Red Dawn in China .................................70 The Grand Slam Block ...............................74 A Magic Sunday ....................................79 A Cow for the Victor . 86 Reaching for the Stars . .91 Duels in Texas . .95 An Abrupt End ....................................100 The Glittering Crowning . 104 No. 1 . .109 Samson’s Return . 116 New York, New York . .122 Setting Records Around the World.....................125 The Other Australian ...............................130 A True Champion..................................137 Fresh Tracks on Clay . .142 Three Men at the Champions Dinner . 146 An Evening in Flushing Meadows . .150 The Savior of Shanghai..............................155 Chasing Ghosts . .160 A Rivalry Is Born .
    [Show full text]
  • Doubles Final (Seed)
    2016 ATP TOURNAMENT & GRAND SLAM FINALS START DAY TOURNAMENT SINGLES FINAL (SEED) DOUBLES FINAL (SEED) 4-Jan Brisbane International presented by Suncorp (H) Brisbane $404780 4 Milos Raonic d. 2 Roger Federer 6-4 6-4 2 Kontinen-Peers d. WC Duckworth-Guccione 7-6 (4) 6-1 4-Jan Aircel Chennai Open (H) Chennai $425535 1 Stan Wawrinka d. 8 Borna Coric 6-3 7-5 3 Marach-F Martin d. Krajicek-Paire 6-3 7-5 4-Jan Qatar ExxonMobil Open (H) Doha $1189605 1 Novak Djokovic d. 1 Rafael Nadal 6-1 6-2 3 Lopez-Lopez d. 4 Petzschner-Peya 6-4 6-3 11-Jan ASB Classic (H) Auckland $463520 8 Roberto Bautista Agut d. Jack Sock 6-1 1-0 RET Pavic-Venus d. 4 Butorac-Lipsky 7-5 6-4 11-Jan Apia International Sydney (H) Sydney $404780 3 Viktor Troicki d. 4 Grigor Dimitrov 2-6 6-1 7-6 (7) J Murray-Soares d. 4 Bopanna-Mergea 6-3 7-6 (6) 18-Jan Australian Open (H) Melbourne A$19703000 1 Novak Djokovic d. 2 Andy Murray 6-1 7-5 7-6 (3) 7 J Murray-Soares d. Nestor-Stepanek 2-6 6-4 7-5 1-Feb Open Sud de France (IH) Montpellier €463520 1 Richard Gasquet d. 3 Paul-Henri Mathieu 7-5 6-4 2 Pavic-Venus d. WC Zverev-Zverev 7-5 7-6 (4) 1-Feb Ecuador Open Quito (C) Quito $463520 5 Victor Estrella Burgos d. 2 Thomaz Bellucci 4-6 7-6 (5) 6-2 Carreño Busta-Duran d.
    [Show full text]
  • Adriano Panatta: He Has Been the Most Beloved Italian Champion in Our History
    Most relevant sports and famous athletes in our countries. Roles of popular sports idols in society 1 C R I.I.S. “CARLO ROSSELLI” GENOVA THE MOST FAMOUS AND WINNING ITALIAN ATHLETES Fencing Waterpolo Tennis Skiing Football Swimming 2 FENCING Fencing is an Olympic discipline. Sword: It is a fair fight between two athletes. There are three types of blades: sword, Foil: foil and saber. If you want to win, you have to hit some parts of the enemy's body. Saber: 3 FENCING Valentina Vezzali is the greatest fencer of all time. Elisa Di Francisca: she won the gold medal at the 2012 London Olympics in both the individual and the team competition and the silver at Rio 2016. 4 FENCING Bebe Vio: she is a young world champion and a paralympic champion. But she is also a presenter, an actress and a motivator for everyone. Italian fencing has a history full of medals and has a tradition envied around the world 5 TENNIS Fabio Fognini: he's currently the Italian player who occupies the highest position in the ATP ranking (22). In his career he has won 9 titles including single and double. Andrea Seppi is an Italian player who is in 59th position of the ATP ranking. 6 TENNIS Adriano Panatta: he has been the most beloved Italian champion in our history. With his successes and his personality he contributed to trasform this sport, during the 70s from sport for few to sport of mass, played by millions of apprentices. Nicola Pietrangeli: he didn’t just win several matches but he also led the Italian national team.
    [Show full text]
  • Vocabulary (Sports) Federer Storms to French Open Win
    OGU 2 (June 9, 2009) Ajarn Major Dr.Ra-shane Meesri ([email protected]) Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University Vocabulary (Sports) Federer storms to French Open win Roger Federer gloriously completed a career Grand Slam on Sunday by capturing a first French Open title, and a record‐equalling 14th major, with a 6‐ 1, 7‐6 (7/1), 6‐4 win over Robin Soderling. Roger Federer in action against Sweden's Robin Soderling during their French Open final at Roland Garros Stadium in Paris. The 27‐year‐old world number two finally won a Roland Garros crown at the 11th attempt and in his fourth successive final having come up heartbreakingly short in the last three showdowns against Spanish nemesis Rafael Nadal. His victory, ironically over the Swedish 23rd seed who shocked four‐time Nadal in the last 16, took him level with great friend Pete Sampras as the holder of 14 Grand Slam titles. He also moved into a select group made up only of Fred Perry, Don Budge, Rod Laver, Roy Emerson and Andre Agassi as men who have won all four of the Grand Slam events. "It was probably my greatest victory, I was under big pressure. I did it and it's phenomenal," said Federer who broke down in tears after being presented with the trophy by Agassi, the 1999 champion, and while the Swiss national anthem was played. OGU 2 (June 9, 2009) Ajarn Major Dr.Ra-shane Meesri ([email protected]) Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University "It was great to be on the podium as a winner for a change.
    [Show full text]