DOCSLIB.ORG

An Empirical Test of Goal-Framing Theory Applied to Collective Performance: The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Empirical Test of Goal-Framing Theory Applied to Collective Performance: The An empirical test of Goal-framing theory applied to collective performance: the mediating role of social well-being and joint production motivation Master Thesis Student: Lina María Bernal Fuentes / Student No. 11710497 MSc. Business Administration, Strategy track University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics and Business Supervisor: Siri Boe-Lillegraven University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics and Business Date: 22th June 2018, Final paper Statement of Originality This document is written by the student Lina María Bernal Fuentes, who declares to take full responsibility for the contents of this document. I declare that the text and the work presented in this document are original and that no sources other than those mentioned in the text and its references have been used in creating it. The Faculty of Economics and Business is responsible solely for the supervision of completion of the work, not for the contents. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Literature review .................................................................................................................................. 7 Goal-framing theory ......................................................................................................................... 7 Three overarching frames: hedonic, gain and normative ............................................................... 9 Goal-framing theory application to pro-social, pro-environmental and collective behaviours .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Pro-social behaviours ................................................................................................................... 11 Pro-environmental behaviours ..................................................................................................... 11 Collective behaviours and organizational applications ............................................................... 13 Well-being ........................................................................................................................................ 16 General definition ......................................................................................................................... 16 The appearance of social well-being ............................................................................................ 17 The conceptual framework ............................................................................................................ 20 Hypotheses development .................................................................................................................... 22 Part 1. Normative frame, joint production motivation and performance. ................................ 22 Part 2. Normative frame, social well-being, joint production motivation, and collective performance..................................................................................................................................... 24 Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 27 Participants ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Materials and task ........................................................................................................................... 29 Operationalization of variables...................................................................................................... 30 Independent variable – normative frame ...................................................................................... 30 Manipulation check ....................................................................................................................... 32 Mediator 1 – social well-being ..................................................................................................... 33 Mediator 2 – goal commitment ..................................................................................................... 34 Dependent variable – Contribution to collective performance ..................................................... 37 Control variables .......................................................................................................................... 38 2 Experiment 1 – control condition .................................................................................................. 38 Experiment 2 – treatment condition.............................................................................................. 39 Pilot .................................................................................................................................................. 40 Data collection ................................................................................................................................. 41 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 42 Part 1. Normative frame, goal commitment and contribution to collective performance ....... 45 Part 2. Normative frame, social well-being, goal commitment and contribution to collective performance..................................................................................................................................... 47 Part 3. Observations ....................................................................................................................... 52 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................ 54 Theoretical implications ................................................................................................................. 54 Practical implications ..................................................................................................................... 57 Future research ............................................................................................................................... 58 Limitations of the study .................................................................................................................. 59 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 60 References ............................................................................................................................................ 61 3 Abstract This thesis tests the application of goal-framing theory in a collective setting and the mediating mechanisms of social well-being and joint production motivation. As proposed by Lindenberg and Foss (2011), first I test if there is a positive relationship between the normative frame and performance, and the mediating role of joint production motivation. Second, I propose using social well-being as a second mediating mechanism that appears from the normative frame and increases joint production motivation and performance. Through a between-subjects experiment (N= 84) implemented with students from the faculty of economics and business at the University of Amsterdam, I found that the normative frame did not lead to higher performance. However, the examination of the normative frame antecedents explains this unexpected result and provides empirical support for Lindenberg and Foss’s (2011) suggested steps to create collective production situations, which is consistent with goal-framing theory. Furthermore, social well-being proved to be a tool that can support or diminish motivation and performance, and its effect largely depends on managers’ ability to manipulate it. Keywords: goal-framing theory; normative frame; joint production motivation; social well- being; collective performance. 4 Introduction Organizations’ ability to pursue goals is one of the most important factors determining high performance. This pursuit is a composite of individual-level goals and collective goals that coexist within organizations and should remain aligned to guarantee success (Gottschalg & Zollo, 2007). Problems arise when people prioritize their individual goals over the firm’s interests. In this matter, goal-framing theory (Lindenberg & Frey, 1993; Lindenberg, 2000; Lindenberg, 2001; Lindenberg & Steg, 2007; Lindenberg, 2008) states that managers can trigger or design frames (environments) within organizations that increase awareness about collective production and drive people’s motivation towards organizational goals achievement. Goal-framing theory states that the normative frame, which focuses on safeguard collective benefits through goals like ‘behaving in the right way’, ‘doing the right thing’, and ‘contributing to collective benefits’ (Lindenberg, 2008), is the most adequate frame to guarantee value creation (Foss & Lindenberg, 2013). This is because it prompts the appearance of pro-social behaviours, interest alignment, and, especially, joint production motivation (Foss & Lindenberg, 2013; 2011). However, its stability can be easily threatened
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scaling up the Multiple-Goal Pursuit Model a Diss
    Dynamic Goal Choice when Environment Demands Exceed Individual’s Capacity: Scaling up the Multiple-Goal Pursuit Model A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Xiaofei Li August 2017 © 2017 Xiaofei Li. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Dynamic Goal Choice when Environment Demands Exceed Individual’s Capacity: Scaling up the Multiple-Goal Pursuit Model by XIAOFEI LI has been approved for the Department of Psychology and the College of Arts and Sciences by Jeffrey B. Vancouver Professor of Psychology Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract LI, XIAOFEI, Ph.D., August 2017, Psychology Dynamic Goal Choice when Environment Demands Exceed Individual’s Capacity: Scaling up the Multiple-Goal Pursuit Model Director of Dissertation: Jeffrey B. Vancouver Navigating the complexities of life where one must managing multiple goals, where one’s status vis-a-vie those goals are constantly changing, and where limited resources undermines the ability to pursue all of one’s goals simultaneously, creates a thorny problem for individuals as well as psychologists trying to understand how individuals manage this process. Recently researchers have started to use computational modeling to better understand the dynamic processes involved in multiple-goal pursuit. However most models and research are limited in a way that (a) they have assumed that people use a normative decision strategy, and (b) focused on the pursuit of two goals. Whereas in real life people often need to juggle more than two goals, decision-making literatures suggested that people may not always adopt the normative strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy, Goal-Setting and Achievement Motivation Among Final Year Students at a Selected University in the Western
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF -EFFICACY, GOAL-SETTING AND ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION AMONG FINAL YEAR STUDENTS AT A SELECTED UNIVERSITY IN THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE BY SAMANTHA DAVIDS STUDENT NUMBER: 2944779 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS COMMERCII In the DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY At the UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE November 2015 Supervisor: Dr. Bright Mahembe Prof Elza Thompson The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-EFFICACY, GOAL-SETTING AND ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION AMONG FINAL YEAR STUDENTS AT A SELECTED UNIVERSITY IN THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE Samantha Davids KEYWORDS: Motivation Student Motivation Intrinsic Motivation Extrinsic Motivation Content theories Process theories Achievement Motivation Goal-setting Self-efficacy Sources of Self efficacy ii ABSTRACT The relationship between self-efficacy, goal-setting and achievement motivation among students in their final year at a selected university in the Western Cape Province S. A. Davids Master of Commerce thesis, Department of Industrial Psychology, University of the Western Cape. The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between self-efficacy, goal-setting and achievement motivation among students in their final year at a selected university in the Western Cape Province. The sample consisted of 128 final year students who were asked to complete a questionnaire. The questionnaires comprise a section on the biographical information of the participants as well as sections containing the, Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, Achievement Motivation Scale and a Goal Setting Questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Goal Setting Workbook
    Workbook for Goal-setting and Evidence-based Strategies for Success Complete Workbook by Caroline Adams Miller, MAPP Author of Creating Your Best Life: The Ultimate Life List Guide Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5 Theme One: Flourishing ................................................................................................. 6 Why Does Flourishing Matter? ................................................................................... 6 Success Flows from Happiness ................................................................................ 6 The Positivity Ratio .................................................................................................. 7 From the Source: Martin Seligman on Flourishing ................................................... 8 Jolts of Joy ................................................................................................................... 9 Happiness Boosters Worksheet ..............................................................................11 Introducing Character Strengths .............................................................................. 12 Exploring Your Own Character Strengths ............................................................. 13 Looking Back: Me at My Best ................................................................................ 14 Find Your Person-Activity Fit ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Goal Setting for Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Performance in Elementary Mathematics
    International Journal of Instruction October 2020 ● Vol.13, No.4 e-ISSN: 1308-1470 ● www.e-iji.net p-ISSN: 1694-609X pp. 1-16 Received: 21/08/2019 Revision: 15/03/2020 Accepted: 01/04/2020 OnlineFirst:02/07/2020 Effect of Goal Setting for Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Performance in Elementary Mathematics Jacklyne D. Sides University of North Georgia, USA, [email protected] Joshua A. Cuevas Assoc. Prof., University of North Georgia, USA, [email protected] Goal setting is utilized by adults regularly to foster success. It has also been shown to benefit academic achievement. This 8-week study sought to determine the effects of goal setting on motivation, self-efficacy, and math achievement in elementary students. The quasi-experimental study included 70 students in 3rd and 4th grade math classes. Students in the experimental group were involved in setting an achievement goal for fluency of multiplication facts. The students monitored their progress through a weekly graphing and reflection activity. The results indicated that elementary students involved in setting goals showed an increase in their mathematical performance of multiplication facts. However, based on the results from this study, goal setting did not have an impact on motivation or self- efficacy. These results support the concept of goal setting theory in the academic setting, suggesting that it may be beneficial for teachers to include goal setting in their day-to-day instructional practices, though further research on its effect on affective traits is warranted. Keywords: goal setting, motivation, self-efficacy, elementary, mathematics, goal setting theory INTRODUCTION There is ongoing research to determine the best methods for how to assist students in achieving academic success.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.How Setting Goals Enhances Learners' Self-Efficacy Beliefs In
    HOW ISSN: 0120-5927 [email protected] Asociación Colombiana de Profesores de Inglés Colombia Ballesteros Muñoz, Liliana; Tutistar Jojoa, Silvana How Setting Goals Enhances Learners’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Listening Comprehension HOW, vol. 21, núm. 1, abril-septiembre, 2014, pp. 42-61 Asociación Colombiana de Profesores de Inglés Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=499450631004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative How Setting Goals Enhances Learners’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Listening Comprehension Cómo el diseño de metas promueve las creencias de auto-eficacia en la comprensión auditiva* Liliana Ballesteros Muñoz [email protected] IED Ciudadela Educativa de Bosa, Colombia Silvana Tutistar Jojoa [email protected] IED Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Colombia This article outlines a study that explores the relationship between SMART goal setting (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-based) and learning English in Colombia concerning a foreign language learners’ self-efficacy beliefs in listening. The participants were seventh and ninth grade students of two schools in Bogotá, Colombia. The results revealed that self-efficacy was highly positive when related to goal setting as students were able to set SMART goals to improve their listening comprehension and learners showed improvement in self-efficacy beliefs and felt more motivated while completing listening tasks related to songs. Furthermore this study shows that goal setting training can be incorporated successfully into the English as a foreign language classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Rationality, Semi-Modularity and Goal-Framing: What Is It All About?
    Analyse & Kritik 30/2008 ( c Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart) p. 669–687 Siegwart Lindenberg Social Rationality, Semi-Modularity and Goal-Framing: What Is It All About? “Our ability to selectively engage and disengage our moral standards [... ] helps explain how people can be barbarically cruel in one moment and compassionate the next.” Albert Bandura Abstract: Human beings are not general problem solvers. Their mental architecture is modular and the microfoundations for the social sciences have to take that into conside- ration. Modularity means that there are hardwired and softwired functionally specific subroutines, such as face recognition and habits that make the individual particularly sensitive to a narrow range of information from both inside and outside. Goals are the most important creators of modules that contain both hard- and softwired submodules. Goals determine what we attend to, what information we are sensitive to, what infor- mation we neglect, what chunks of knowledge and what concepts are being activated at a given moment, what we like and dislike, what criteria for goal achievement are being applied, etc. Overarching goals govern large classes of submodules, and therefore the social sciences have to deal especially with these overarching goals. Three such overarching goals are identified: hedonic, gain, and normative goals. At every given moment one of them is focal (a goal-frame) and self-regulation is the process by which humans balance the dominance of goal-frames. In turn, self-regulation (here seen as the heart of ‘social rationality’), depends much on social circumstances that are open to sociological investigation. 0. Introduction Rational choice theory (RCT) has achieved much in the social sciences but has for some time now been in need of a major overhaul.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation a 35-Year Odyssey
    Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation A 35-Year Odyssey Edwin A. Locke University of Maryland Gary P. Latham University of Toronto The authors summarize 35 years of empirical research on largely ignored, however, except for a citation in Ryan’s goal-setting theory. They describe the core findings of the classic text with Smith on industrial psychology (Ryan & theory, the mechanisms by which goals operate, modera- Smith, 1954). tors of goal effects, the relation of goals and satisfaction, Goal-setting theory was formulated inductively and the role of goals as mediators of incentives. The largely on the basis of our empirical research conducted external validity and practical significance of goal-setting over nearly four decades. It is based on Ryan’s (1970) theory are explained, and new directions in goal-setting premise that conscious goals affect action. A goal is the research are discussed. The relationships of goal setting to object or aim of an action, for example, to attain a specific other theories are described as are the theory’s limitations. standard of proficiency, usually within a specified time limit. As industrial–organizational psychologists, our pri- mary interest has been to predict, explain, and influence performance on organizational or work-related tasks. Thus, n the 1950s and 1960s, the study of motivation in we focused on the relationship between conscious perfor- North American psychology was not considered a re- mance goals and level of task performance rather than on Ispectable pursuit. The field was dominated by behav- discrete intentions to take specific actions (e.g., to apply to iorists, and “motivation” was argued by them to lie outside graduate school, to get a medical examination).
    [Show full text]
  • Automaticity in Goal Pursuit
    AUTOMATICITYPROCESSES CHAPTER 34 C€ Automaticity in Goal Pursuit PETERM. GOLL\TITZER IOHN A. BARGH -fh. incersectionof competenceand moti- scious attention is divided and in short sup- I vation involves the ability to attain one's plv. goals, to accomplishwhat one sets out to Two main forms of unconsciousgoal pur- do. Both modern and classictheory and re- suit have been featured in our research:one search on goal pursuit have focused mainly (automaticmotivations) a long-term,chronic on the conscious and deliberate ways that form that develops out of extended experi- people strive toward desired end states.In ence; the other (implementation intentions) this chapter,we focus on the role played by a temporary and strategic form by which automaticor unconsciousmotivations in the one sets up intended actions in advance, so competent pursuit of one's important goals. that they later unfold in an automatic fash- How can such unconsciousgoal pursuit add ion. Before describing these two lines of re- to a person's competenciesin a given do- search,we begin with some historical back- main? \ü/eshow that unconsciouslypursued ground on the concept of uRconscious goals are especially effective in keeping a motivation as it has come and gone within "on person task" and moving in thought psychology over the past century. and action toward the desired goal, even when the consciousmind is distracted or fo- cusedelsewhere. Automatic or unconscious HISTORY OF THE UNCONSCIOUS motivations respond immediately and effort- MOTIVATION CONCEPT lessly to environmental conditions (triggers) that promote or support the goal in ques- The unconscioushas had a long and bumpy tion, such as in recognizing and acting upon ride through the history of psychology.Few, opportunities that otherwise might have if any,other psychologicalconcepts have in- been missed.And the efficient nature of un- stigated this much contention and polariza- consciousmotivation makes it an especially tion of opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Development Plan
    Personal Development Plan This e-book is published by Mind Tools Ltd. Copyright © Mind Tools Ltd, 2007-2014. All rights reserved. Version 2.0. This e-book is protected by international copyright law. You may only use it if you have downloaded it directly from MindTools.com, or if you have been provided with it under a corporate license. If you have received this from any other source please contact [email protected]. “Mind Tools” is a registered trademark (US 4,566,696, EU 012473377) of Mind Tools Ltd. Cover image © iStockphoto/xxmmxx. Contents 1. Why a Personal Development Plan? 1 2. Understanding Yourself 2 3. Defining Your Career Objectives 11 4. Creating Your Personal Development Plan 16 Personal Development Plan Worksheet 21 Action Plan 22 Personal Development Plan | Mind Tools iii Personal Development Plan Workbook Introduced by Mind Tools CEO James Manktelow ou have probably come to Mind Tools because you care about your career and you’re prepared to work at building a happy, satisfying and successful life. YPart of this involves thinking about what “satisfaction” means to you: after all, each of us gets fulfillment and happiness from different things. That’s why you need to think about this for yourself, rather than following someone else’s pre-prepared plan. Another part of this involves making sure that you have the skills needed to take advantage of opportunities when they arise (as they will, if you work hard and think about what you’re doing). That’s why it’s important to take a systematic approach to developing your skills, so they’re ready when you need them.
    [Show full text]
  • Goal Setting in Sport and Exercise: Results, Methodo- Logical Issues and Future Directions for Research1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE 2 -weinberg 02/04/03 16:29 Página 115 provided by Diposit Digital de Documents de la UAB GOAL SETTING IN SPORT AND EXERCISE: RESULTS, METHODO- LOGICAL ISSUES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH1 Robert S. Weinberg* RESUMEN: El propósito de este artículo es proporcionar una visión general respecto a la investigación en el campo del establecimiento de objetivos y el rendimiento en situaciones deportivas y de ejercicio físico. La mayor parte de las primeras investigaciones en este campo pertenecían al área de la organización y la industria, y únicamente en los últimos diez años los investigadores se han centrado en las situaciones deportivas y en el ejercicio físico. Se han dado a menudo hallazgos controvertidos, debidos en parte al empleo de métodos demasiado directos y en parte a que los dos marcos (organización/industria y deporte) difieren bastante. Estas diferencias se dan respecto a las características de la tarea, el tipo de situación, las dificultades del objetivo, los objetivos personales y la aparición de fijaciones espontáneas de objetivos. Estas variables se consideran como mediadores potenciales de la relación entre las distintos fijaciones de objetivos. Recientemente, Weinberg y cols. han entrevistado atletas universitarios respecto a sus prácticas de establecimiento de objetivos, y han observado que una investigación de tipo más cualitativo nos permitiría 1 Portions of this article are based on an article by from: Weinberg, R. S. (1994). Goal setting and performance in sport and exercise settings: A synthesis and critique. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, 26, 469-477.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Concordance Leads to Goal Progress Through Subjective Ease, Not
    Running head: EFFORTLESS GOAL PURSUIT 3 Some goals just feel easier: Self-concordance leads to goal progress through subjective ease, not effort Kaitlyn M. Werner1 Marina Milyavskaya Carleton University Emily Foxen-Craft University of Maryland, Baltimore Country Richard Koestner McGill University 1Corresponding Author: Kaitlyn M. Werner, MSc. is a PhD candidate in the Social, Personality, and Health program in the Department of Psychology at Carleton University. Her research examines the antecedents and underlying mechanisms that facilitate successful goal pursuit over time. Email: [email protected], address: Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Loeb 550, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1S 5B6. Werner, K. M., Milyavskaya, M., Foxen-Craft, E., & Koestner, R. (2016). Some goals just feel easier: Self-concordance leads to goal progress through subjective ease, not effort. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 237-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.002 EFFORTLESS GOAL PURSUIT 2 Abstract The objective of the present study was to examine whether subjective ease of goal pursuit would mediate the relation between an individual’s motivation for pursuing a goal and their subsequent goal progress. Toward the beginning of a university semester, participants (n=176) identified three goals they planned to pursue throughout the semester and reported their motivation for pursuing each of them. Participants then indicated, at two monthly follow-ups, how easy and natural it felt to pursue these goals and how much effort they were putting into attaining them. At the end of the semester, participants reported on their goal progress. Within-person analyses indicated that self-concordant goals were perceived as being easier to pursue relative to an individual’s other goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Goal Setting for Small Business
    U.S. Small Business Administration MP-6 PLANNING AND GOAL SETTING FOR SMALL BUSINESS Management and Planning Series ______________________________________________________________________________ While we consider the contents of this publication to be of general merit, its sponsorship by the U.S. Small Business Administration does not necessarily constitute an endorsement of the views and opinions of the authors or the products and services of the companies with which they are affiliated. All of SBA's programs and services are extended to the public on a nondiscriminatory basis. ______________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES 1 PREPARING FOR THE MBO PROGRAM Understanding the Requirements of an MBO Program 1 Defining Your Business 2 Setting Goals 2 Devising a Work Plan 2 Reporting Progress 3 Evaluating Performance 4 INSTALLING THE MBO PROGRAM 6 THREATS TO AN MBO PROGRAM 6 SUMMARY 6 APPENDIX: INFORMATION RESOURCES 7 ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Many authorities on business management identify the five major functions of management as ! Planning. ! Organizing. ! Directing. ! Controlling. ! Coordinating. The planning and controlling functions of management often receive less attention from the small business owner-manager than they should. One way to more effectively fulfill these two functions is through effective goal setting. The success of a business will depend on its long-range goals for sales, profits, competitive position, development of personnel and industrial relations. To accomplish these goals, the company will need to identify intermediate goals that it can work toward each year. ______________________________________________________________________________ MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES Traditionally, people have worked according to descriptions that list the activities or functions of the job. The management by objectives (MBO) approach, on the other hand, stresses results.
    [Show full text]