DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysisby Census Wards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysisby Census Wards J7ournal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1993; 47: 109-115 Cancer in young people in the north of England, J Epidemiol Community Health: first published as 10.1136/jech.47.2.109 on 1 April 1993. Downloaded from 1968-85: analysis by census wards Alan W Craft, Louise Parker, Stan Openshaw, Martin Charlton, James Newell, Jill M Birch, Val Blair Abstract some villages, particularly Seascale, near to the Objective-To determine whether the seem- Sellafield nuclear installation, and that they could ing excess of childhood leukaemia and lym- find no biological explanation for this when known phoma identified in Seascale, Cumbria, UK, radiation exposures were taken into consideration. remains unusual when put into a wider The Black report made a number of recommen- context. dations for further study, the results ofwhich have Design-Analysis ofcancer incidence by geo- been published. These include a Seascale birth graphical area. cohort study,2 a Seascale school cohort study,3 Setting-The north ofEngland including the and a case-control study of leukaemia and lym- Northern and North Western Regional phoma in west Cumbria.4 The cohort studies have Health Authority regions and the Southport confirmed an increased risk of leukaemia in those and South Sefton districts of the Mersey children born in Seascale but not in those who Regional Health Authority. attended school in the district ofSeascale but were Subjects-Altogether 6686 cases ofmalignant born elsewhere. The case-control study of leukae- disease in people under 25 years old. mia and lymphoma has pointed to an increased Measurements and main results-Cases of risk for the children of workers employed at the cancer diagnosed before their 25th birthday nuclear installation at Sellafield who were exposed between January 1968 and December 1985 to relatively high doses of radiation. In addition identified from three regional cancer regis- recommendation 4 stated: tries were allocated to a census ward on the 'The Northern Children's Cancer Registry basis of'usual place ofresidence'. Population should be asked to analyse their data using 1961, data were derived from the 1971 and 1981 1971 and 1981 population census data where censuses, and the cancer incidence was cal- appropriate. Also stratification for age at diagnosis culated for each ward. Of the 6686 cases, and grouping by census ward at birth (as well as at there were 1035 cases ofacute lymphoblastic diagnosis) should be undertaken, to determine the leukaemia and 361 of non-Hodgkins lym- contribution these factors make to the incidence of phoma. Wards were ranked by cancer inci- leukaemia at Seascale.' dence and Poisson probability, using The data supplied to the Black enquiry from the different population bases. Seascale ward is Northern Children's Region Malignant Disease http://jech.bmj.com/ the most highly ranked ward for acute lym- Registry were those for 1968-82, using 1981 phoblastic leukaemia for the time periods census population data for children diagnosed 1968-85 or 1968-76. It is not the most highly before their 15th birthday. The purpose of ranked for non-Hodgkins lymphoma. How- recommendation 4 was to put the apparent excess Departments of Child ever, acute Health and Medical combining lymphoblastic leukae- of leukaemia in Seascale into a wider context and Statistics, University mia and non-Hodgkins lymphoma incidence in consultation with the Department of Health of Newcastle upon gives an even more extreme position for and Social Security it was decided to extend Tyne, The Medical Seascale. The most extreme on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. School, Framlington Poisson proba- further the recommendation to include data from Place, Newcastle upon bility for any of the analyses was that for the Manchester Children's Tumor Registry and to Tyne. NE2 4HH brain tumours in the electoral ward ofAshton obtain information for all young people diagnosed A W Craft St Michael, Tameside (p=0*000009). L Parker as having cancer before their 25th birthday. It was J Newell Conclusion-The incidence of acute lym- also agreed to include the Southport and South Centre for Urban and phoblastic leukaemia and non-Hodgkins Sefton districts ofthe Mersey health region so that Rural Development lymphoma in the Seascale ward remains high the whole of the Studies, University of coastline from the Solway to the Newcastle upon Tyne. when put into a wider context. For other Mersey could be included. S Openshaw cancers there are wards with even more Seascale is an electoral ward and by analysing M Charlton extreme Poisson probability values. cancer incidence data Department of by electoral ward for the Epidemiology and whole of the Northern and North Western Social Oncology, J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 109-115 Regional Health Authorities plus the two Mersey University of health districts the relative Manchester. importance of the J M Birch apparent excess described in the Black report V Blair The seeming excess of cancer in young people on could be explored. the Cumbrian coast identified in 1983 by Correspondence to: Professor A Craft Yorkshire Television in a documentary entitled, Windscale: the nuclear laundry led the government Methods Accepted for publication to set up an independent inquiry under the CANCER August 1992 REGISTRATION DATA chairmanship of Sir Douglas Black. The report of Cases of cancer in young people diagnosed this advisory group' concluded that there did seem between January 1968 and December 1985 were to be an excess of leukaemia in young people in ascertained from existing cancer registries. The 110 Alatn W Craft, Louise Parker, Stan Openshaw, Martin Charlton, James Newell, Jill M Birch, Val Blair 0-14 year old children from the northern region all ages but is likely to be better for younger J Epidemiol Community Health: first published as 10.1136/jech.47.2.109 on 1 April 1993. Downloaded from were obtained from the Northern Region Child- people.7 All cases from 0-24 years for the two ren's Malignant Disease Registry which was estab- Mersey districts were ascertained from the Mersey lished in 19685 and for the north west region from Regional Cancer Registry. the Manchester Children's Tumour Registry, Patients included were all those with malignant established in 1953.6 Both registries have a high disease receiving their first treatment, or having level of case ascertainment, estimated at greater the diagnosis confirmed if no treatment given, than 98%, and there is extensive cross checking before their 25th birthday. Those with benign or with other data sources. All cases have central borderline intracranial or intraspinal neoplasms pathological review. The 15-24 year old cases were included but carcinoma in situ of the cervix from the northern and north western regions were was excluded. The National Health Service was obtained from the relevant regional cancer reorganised in 1974 and regional administrative registries. The registries contribute their data to borders changed. The geographical boundaries of the national cancer registration system. Ascer- this study were therefore taken as those areas tainment is thought to be in the region of 94% for common to the pre-1974 Newcastle and Man- Table I Number of cases by registry, agc group (y), and disease category, Age grouips (j) Age groiups (s) i.n New-castle i.n Alanichester r-egistry registry Diagniosis 0-14 15-24 0-14 15-24 Total Acute Ivmphoblastic leukaimia 359 81 459 136 1035 Acute myeloid leukemia 66 59 83 103 311 Chronic mycloid leukaemia 7 13 13 24 57 Other leukaemia 4 9 9 15 37 Northern Astrocytoma/glioma 156 108 192 122 578 Region Medulloblastoma 61 1:3 88 15 177 Ependymoma 30 14 48 16 108 Craniopharyngioma 19 17 19 12 67 Other brain 25 57 26 44 152 Osteosarcoma 40 40 44 61 185 North Ewing's sarcoma 22 26 27 34 109 Western Other bone 3 11 7 17 38 Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 76 73 95 117 361 Region Hodgkin's lymphoma 56 285 72 353 766 Wilms' tumour 71 94 14 179 Neuroblastoma 71 4 100 6 181 Ganglioneuroblastoma 5 1 2 8 Retinoblastoma 48 41 - 89 Rhabdomyosarcoma 54 11 57 20 142 Other soft tissue sarcoma 20 51 21 71 163 Hepatoblastoma 7 3 10 1 21 Germ cell tumours 31 111 63 198 403 South port 440 191 784 1519 Miscellaneous 104 and c 6686 South Sefton Total 1335 1427 1761 2163 Districts of Mersey Region Table II Poissoni probability rankinlg: all canicers, 1981 census populationi data chester Regional Hospital Boards and the present http://jech.bmj.com/ Niumiibers Statistics Northern and North Westem Regional Health /-, n D I' - *' 1 - 1, ;I; Ward niamiie c Hate Ir(osmlty) Authorities plus the Southport and South Sefton Aged 0- 24 v,, 1968-85: districts of the Mersey region (fig 1). The local Kendal Fell, South Lakeland, Cumbria 526 7 5 8 *0002610 in the Central Bolton, Greater Manchester 4698 24 2 2 0003544 authority administrative counties included Prudhoe South, Tynedale, Northumberland 1374 11 3.5 0004430 study area were Greater Manchester, Tyne and John O'Gaunt, Lancaster, Lancashire 2347 15 2 8 *0004881 Lancashire, Beswick, Manchester, Greater Manchester 3492 19 2-4 *0006681 Wear, Cleveland, Cumbria, Durham, are on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Aged 0-14 sv, 1968-85: and Northumberland. The first three large 6 6-9 *0002804 Seascale, Copelaind, Cumbria 411 metropolitan urban areas with predominantly Easterside, Middlesbrough, Cleveland 1021 8 3.7 *0017235 No 6. Sedgefield, Durham 600 6 4.7 *0019432 heavy engineering and chemical industries while 4 7-1 *0026720 Kendall Fell, South Lakeland, Cumbria 267 the latter four are largely rural. All patients whose Prudhoe South, Tynedale, Northumberland 676 6 4 2 *0034776 'usual place of residence' at the time of diagnosis Aged 15-24 v, 1968-85: Central, Bolton, Greater Manchester 1914 15 2-6 *0009149 was within this area were included.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vote for Sedgefield in the People's Millions!
    Published by Sedgefield Development Partnership: Company No: 4312745 Charity No: 1100906 Insert logo in Sedgefield News current month’s colour Produced by volunteers for the villagers of Sedgefield, Bradbury & Mordon November 2005 Vote for Sedgefield in the People’s Millions! Congratulations to Sedgefield The idea is to encourage us to management of the woodland areas Community Association! make more use of the gardens by and some sensitive lighting would They have made it through to providing a safer and more be designed to reduce the the last six in the Tyne Tees pleasant environment. Winning the opportunities for the kind of anti- region for a People’s Millions grant would allow access for elderly social behaviour which can and grant, with their bid to and disabled visitors to be greatly often does take place there. revitalise the grounds and lake improved, with better footpaths So tune in to North East Tonight behind Ceddesfeld Hall. and seating. Importantly, careful (Tyne Tees) on Wednesday 2nd November between 6 - 6:30pm, to vote for the Sedgefield project in the People’s Millions contest. The winner could be awarded up to £50,000 from the Big Lottery Fund! Sedgefield is up against the much larger Wansbeck District Council’s project and they have many more prospective voters, so we need every-one to take the time to vote online or by telephone. Ask all your friends to vote too, and don’t leave it too late - the winners will be announced the next day on North East Tonight. Rainbows skip for Air Ambulance 2nd Sedgefield Rainbows recently presented a £150 cheque to the Great North Air Ambulance’s area co-ordinator, Sue Cave.
    [Show full text]
  • MAN/00EJ/RTB/2019/0011 Property : 4 Laburnum Road
    FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00EJ/RTB/2019/0011 Property : 4 Laburnum Road, West Cornforth, Ferryhill, County Durham DL17 9NJ Applicant : Colin Covey and Doreen Covey Respondent : Livin Housing Limited Type of Application : Determination of Right to Buy Housing Act 1985, Schedule 5, Paragraph 11, as amended by Housing Act 2004, Section 181 Tribunal Members : Mr I D Jefferson TD BA BSc FRICS Mrs K Usher Date of Determination : 11 October 2019 Date of Decision 18 October 2019 DECISION © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019 1 Decision: The Tribunal is satisfied that the Property is particularly suitable for occupation by elderly persons and that the Respondent is able to rely upon Schedule 5 paragraph 11 of the Housing Act 1985. The Applicant is therefore denied the right to buy. Application and Background 1. The Applicant is the tenant and occupier of the Property and gave notice to the Landlord of intention to exercise the right to buy. The papers are not before the Tribunal but the Tribunal assume that the Application was received. 2. The Landlord then served a Notice (form RTB 2) dated 11 July 2019 on the Applicant under Section 124 of the Act denying the right to buy on the grounds set out in paragraph 11 to Schedule 5 of the Act. 3. By an application dated 26 July 2019 the Applicant applied to the Tribunal for a determination as to whether the dwelling house is suitable for occupation by elderly persons. 4. The Application was copied to the Landlord. Representations and hearing 5. The Tribunal received written representations from both parties.
    [Show full text]
  • 7206 Thf London Gazette, 11 September, 19J 4
    7206 THF LONDON GAZETTE, 11 SEPTEMBER, 19J 4. SECOND SCHEDULE. ESSEX. Municipal Boroughs.—Chelmsford: Colches- PROHIBITED AREAS. ter : Harwich: Maldon: Southend-on-Sea. Urban Districts.—Brentwood: Brightlingeea:. The following areas are prohibited areas in Burnham-on-Crouch: Clacton: Frinton-on- England: — Sea: Grays Thurrock: Leigh-on-Sea: Shoe- CHESHIRE. bury ness : Tilbury: Walton-on-the-Naze. County Boroughs.—Birkenhead: Chester: Witham: Wivenhoe. Wallasey. Rural Districts.—Billericay: Braintree—(Civ: Urban Districts.—Bromborough : Ellesmere Parishes of—Feering, Great Coggeshall Port and Whitby: Higher Bebington: Kelvedon, Little C'oggeshall, MarkshalU Hoole: Hoylake and West Kirby: Lower Rivenhall, Fairsted, Faulkbourne, Hatfield. Bebington: Neston and Parkgate: Runcorn. Peverel, and Terling only) : Chelmsford: Rural Districts.—Chester (Civil Parishes of— Lexden: Maldon : Orsett: Rochf ord: Tend." Bache, Backford, Blacom-cum-Crabwall, ring. Bridge Trafford, Capenhurst, Caughall, GLOUCESTERSHIRE . Chorlton by Backford, Croughton, Dunham- County Borough.—Bristol. on-the-Hill, Elton, Great Saughall, Haps- Urban Districts.—C'oleford : Kingswood. ford, Hoole Village, Ince, Lea by Backford, Rural Districts.—Chipping Sodbury: Lyd- Little Saughall, Little Stanney, Mickle bury: Thornbury: Warmley: West Dean. Trafford, Mollington, Moston, Newton-by- Chester, Picto^i, Shotwick, Shotwick Park, HAMPSHIRE. Stoke, Thornton-le-Moors, Upton-by- County Boroughs.—Bournemouth: Ports- Chester, Wervin, Wimbolds Trafford, and mouth : Southampton. Woodbank only): Runcorn (Civil Parishes Municipal Boroughs.—Christchurch : Lyming- of—Acton Grange, Antrobus, Appleton, ton: Romsey. Bartington, Crowley, Daresbury, Dutton, Urban Districts.—Eastleigh and Bishopstoke . Grappenhall, Great Budworth, Hatton, Fareham: Gosport and Alverstoke. Higher Whitley, Keckwick, Latchford Havant: Itchen: Warblington. Without, Lower Whitley, Moore, Newton- Rural Districts.—Christchurch : Fareham by-Daresbury, Preston-on-the-Hill, Seven Havant: Ljonington: New Forest: Romsey.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 No. 170 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2005 No. 170 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The County of Lancashire (Electoral Changes) Order 2005 Made - - - - 1st February 2005 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) recommendations dated October 2004 on its review of the county of Lancashire: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give effect, with modifications, to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the County of Lancashire (Electoral Changes) Order 2005. (2) This Order shall come into force – (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005. Interpretation 2. In this Order – (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41). The Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham
    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England April 2004 Contents Introduction 3 Summary of Key Findings 5 Methodology 7 Definitions of Social Grade and Area 11 Topline Findings (Marked-up Questionnaire) 13 Introduction This summary report presents the key findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England in the Derwentside District Council area, County Durham. The aim of the research was to establish residents’ views about alternative patterns of unitary local government. Background to the Research In May 2003, the Government announced that a referendum would take place in autumn 2004 in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions on whether there should be elected regional assemblies. The Government indicated that, where a regional assembly is set up, the current two-tier structure of local government - district, borough or city councils (called in this report ‘districts’) and county councils - should be replaced by a single tier of ‘unitary’ local authorities. In June 2003, the Government directed The Boundary Committee for England (‘the Committee’) to undertake an independent review of local government in two-tier areas in the three regions, with a view to recommending possible unitary structures to be put before affected local people in a referendum at a later date. MORI was commissioned by COI Communications, on behalf of the Committee, to help it gauge local opinion. The research was in two stages. First, in summer 2003, MORI researched local residents’ views about local government and how they identify with their local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Reddish Baths, Library & Community Centre Approved Planning Brief
    Planning Brief Reddish Library/Community Centre/Swimming Baths/Mortuary Reddish Stockport March 2009 Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Planning Brief Reddish Library/Community Centre/Swimming Baths/Mortuary 1.0 OBJECTIVE 1.1 The purpose of this brief is to provide planning guidance to developers to guide the regeneration/development of this important site close to Reddish District Centre. This brief is prepared by the Regeneration Economic Development and Tourism Section, Environment and Economy Directorate in consultation with the Development Control Section, Planning Policy Section, and N.P.S. Property Consultants who are the Council’s Estates and Asset Management Advisors. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Location and Context (Plan1) This is a prominent site located on Gorton Road, 0.5 Km from Houldsworth Square and 1km from North Reddish Local Centre, and comprises 3 buildings plus an outbuilding with separate uses. The site is bounded by: to the north: by Spencer Street to the east: by unnamed passageway between Spencer Street and Melbourne Street to the south: by Melbourne Street to the west: by Gorton Road. 2.2 Opportunities This prominent group of civic buildings has significant townscape value: their public frontage to Gorton Road represents a local landmark and contributes positively to the quality and appearance of this part of Reddish, an area of predominantly residential housing that developed in the mid-late 19th century to serve local industries. 2 The group has a fine and imposing frontage, largely unaltered from its original design and external appearance. Whilst the interiors to the fire station, library and baths have all been altered to varying degrees, they still maintain a strong sense of their original character, form and function.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Stockport
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Stockport Report to The Electoral Commission September 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 355 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 45 Appendices A Final recommendations for Stockport: Detailed mapping 47 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 49 C First draft of the electoral change Order for Stockport 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Keswick Drive 10Nov Daytime Force Side UPVC Door Removing Centre Panel
    14 Nov 2012 Produced by Vol Jenny Mole Bury East: Burglaries: Keswick Drive 10Nov Daytime Force Side UPVC Door Removing Centre Panel. Untidy Search Stealing Cash & Jewellery Before Exit As Entry. Gigg Lane7Nov Daytime Break Window In Rear Door Using Key Inside To Unlock Door. Untidy Search Of All Rooms Closing Blinds. Pull Down Loft Hatch & Enter Storage Area, Searching All Before Leaving Premises. Burglary Other: Bolton St 14Nov Early Hours Climb Wooden Fence & Smash Rear Ground Floor Window With Slate. Disturbed By Police Officers Before Entry & Arrested At Scene. Goldfinch Drive 11Nov Overnight Use Rock To Smash D/Glazed Kitchen Window To Rear Of Council Premises. Tidy Search Of All Rooms Moving Upstairs Wooden Door Frame To Kitchen Before Exit As Entry. Inglewood Close 10Nov Overnight Enter Garage Through Insecure Side Door Stealing Quad Bike From Within. Inglewood Close 10Nov Overnight Enter Unlocked Changing Rooms At Sports Club Taking Unattended Wallet. Theft from Motor Vehicles: Wash Lane 13Nov Early Hours Scale Wall To Side From Adjacent Alley Entering Rear Garden. Smash N/side Window Of Parked Secure Vehicle Taking Satnav. Wash Lane 10Nov Overnight Locked Secured Vehicle Has Rear Spoiler & Bumper Trim Removed. Deal Street 10Nov Afternoon Smash Offside Driver Window Of Unattended Secured Vehicle Removing Phone. Britain Street 9Nov Evening Smash Rear Offside Window Of Vehicle Secure Parked Reaching In To Steal Property. Raven Street 9-10Nov Search Inside Of Insecure Vehicle Including Glovebox/backseat And Boot Taking No Items. Rochdale Old Road 7-8Nov Remove Both Nearside & Offside Indicator Light Boxes From Secure Vehicle. Theft of Motor Vehicles: Radcliffe Road 8Nov Evening Enter Insecure Changing Rooms Removing Property From Jacket.
    [Show full text]
  • Bury but Better Report
    Bury Town Centre: Vision and development strategy Report by: URBED with King Sturge, TPP and JRUD Bury but better Town Centre Vision and Development Strategy - Consultation Draft - A report for... Bury Metropolitan Borough Council by... URBED with King Sturge, TPP and JRUD March 2003 110. 111. Bury but better Town Centre Vision and Development Strategy - Consultation Draft - A report for... Contents Bury Metropolitan Borough Council Page by... Part 1 Context URBED with King Sturge, TPP 1 Introduction 1 and JRUD 2 A renaissance vision 3 3 The study approach 5 March 2003 4 Bury in the past 7 5 Bury today 11 Part 2 Urban Design Analysis 15 6 The structure of the town 17 7 The public realm of the town centre 19 8 Townscape assessment 27 Part 3 Economic Analysis 35 9 Market assessment 37 URBED 10 Town centre health check 49 10 Little Lever Street MANCHESTER Part 4 Transport Analysis 57 M1 1HR 11 Access to the town centre 59 t. 0161 200 5500 Part 5 Vision and strategy 67 [email protected] 12 Towards a vision - SWOT analysis 69 13 Towards a vision - Bury but better 75 14 Development Strategy 79 15 Towards a masterplan - process and principles 87 16 Towards a masterplan - quarters 94 TPP 17 Next Steps 105 Report by: URBED with King Sturge, TPP and JRUD Introduction 1. Bury but better ment interests to the benefit of the town. This study will, therefore, be useful in negotiations with these developers - indeed discussions with This report was commissioned by Bury Council the developers have been ongoing throughout to develop a vision and strategy for the town the study period.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Federation of Women's Institutes
    LIST OF LANCASHIRE WIs 2021 Venue & Meeting date shown – please contact LFWI for contact details Membership number, formation year and month shown in brackets ACCRINGTON & DISTRICT (65) (2012) (Nov.) 2nd Wed., 7.30 p.m., Enfield Cricket Club, Dill Hall Lane, Accrington, BB5 4DQ, ANSDELL & FAIRHAVEN (83) (2005) (Oct.) 2nd Tues, 7.30 p.m. Fairhaven United Reformed Church, 22A Clifton Drive, Lytham St. Annes, FY8 1AX, www.ansdellwi.weebly.com APPLEY BRIDGE (59) (1950) (Oct.) 2nd Weds., 7.30 p.m., Appley Bridge Village Hall, Appley Lane North, Appley Bridge, WN6 9AQ www.facebook.com/appleybridgewi ARKHOLME & DISTRICT (24) (1952) (Nov.) 2nd Mon., 7.30 p.m. Arkholme Village Hall, Kirkby Lonsdale Road, Arkholme, Carnforth, LA6 1AT ASHTON ON RIBBLE (60) (1989) (Oct.) 2nd Tues., 1.30 p.m., St. Andrew’s Church Hall, Tulketh Road, Preston, PR2 1ES ASPULL & HAIGH (47) (1955) (Nov.) 2nd Mon., 7.30 p.m., St. Elizabeth's Parish Hall, Bolton Road, Aspull, Wigan, WN2 1PR ATHERTON (46) (1992) (Nov.) 2nd Thurs., 7.30 p.m., St. Richard’s Parish Centre, Jubilee Hall, Mayfield Street, Atherton, M46 0AQ AUGHTON (48) (1925) (Nov.) 3rd Tues., 7.30 p.m., ‘The Hut’, 42 Town Green Lane, Aughton, L39 6SF AUGHTON MOSS (19) (1955) (Nov.) 1st Thurs., 2.00 p.m., Christ Church Ministry Centre, Liverpool Road, Aughton BALDERSTONE & DISTRICT (42) (1919) (Nov.) 2nd Tues., 7.30 p.m., Mellor Brook Community Centre, 7 Whalley Road, Mellor Brook, BB2 7PR BANKS (51) (1952) (Nov.) 1st Thurs., 7.30 p.m., Meols Court Lounge, Schwartzman Drive, Banks, Southport, PR9 8BG BARE & DISTRICT (67) (2006) (Sept.) 3rd Thurs., 7.30 p.m., St.
    [Show full text]
  • See Over I T D O S O H D S a T E G G O E E
    Bolton.qxp_Bolton417000 08/07/2019 11:53 Page 1 417000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 6 5 4 2 1 9 3 O 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 O E 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Charter's Moss Plantation 3 R N F A I E L S L T D W O Edgworth A N H E S S Turton K Y B A Whittles W A Heights W A N Wayoh W H K Reservoir O R D O A A D E M G R H EE A N R S B A O R U M R S LA R . Top o' th' Meadow O A Plantation D B U R Y R STONES BANK ROAD O A D S 416000 416000 Hawkshaw Wood B D L EGERTON ROA A C K B Hall Shore U R N Cheetham Turton R Close LO O H Bottoms NG A I W D G OR H TH S RO T AD R T E E E E T R T S Chapeltown R Delph Dimple E L Reservoir A V K E R N A P A E T L L C P I W A IM R D C T H S O R X S K I E G D R D W A I E B S D E H U H R N Bra Y U d R sha R R E O w Y R I B A ro R U L D D O A S ok B C A N L D S E .
    [Show full text]
  • Heatons & Reddish Area Committee
    HEATONS & REDDISH AREA COMMITTEE Meeting: 9 November 2020 At: 6.00 pm PRESENT Councillor Roy Driver (Chair) in the chair; Councillor Dena Ryness (Vice-Chair); Councillors Kate Butler, Dean Fitzpatrick, Colin Foster, Yvonne Guariento, Tom McGee, Janet Mobbs, David Sedgwick, John Taylor, Jude Wells and David Wilson. 1. MINUTES The Minutes (copies of which had been circulated) of the meeting held o 30 September 2020 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillors and officers were invited to declare any interests they had in any of the items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations of interest were made. 3. URGENT DECISIONS No urgent decisions were reported. 4. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT (i) Chair's Announcements The Chair informed the Committee that an additional item had been included on the agenda, Item 11 – The Clean Air Plan. (ii) Public Question Time Members of the public were invited to put questions to the Chair of the Area Committee on any matters within the powers and duties of the Area Committee, subject to the exclusions set out in the Code of Practice. Two public questions were submitted in relation to road problems in Reddish Vale. Reddish Vale area road problems In response, it was stated that a member of the Area Committee had already informed the questioner of the date of the December Highways meeting where the issue will be raised. A formal response would be shared with the questioner and the Committee. Highways Agency adopting the road Heatons & Reddish Area Committee - 9 November 2020 In response, the Area Committee agreed to clarify whether the Highways Agency intended to adopt the road and noted that the issue had been raised with the appropriate body directly.
    [Show full text]