An alternative transformation factor in the framework of the relativistic of light

D Rold´an1,∗ R Sempertegui,† F Rold´an‡ 1University of Cuenca

Abstract In the present study, we analyze in combination the principles of and the phenomenon of the aberration of light, deriving a system of equations that allows establishing the relationship between the angles commonly involved in this phenomenon. As a consequence, a transformation factor is obtained that generates two solutions, one of them with the same values as the Lorentz factor. This suggests that due to relativistic aberration, an apparent double image of celestial objects could be obtained. On the other hand, its functional form does not establish a limit to the speed of the reference frames with inertial movement.

Keywords: relativistic aberration, alternative Lorentz transformations, faster than light

1 Introduction tive studies with didactic interest [3], with this study falling into the latter category. The aberration of light is a phenomenon in as- The phenomenon of the aberration of light tronomy in which the location of celestial objects can be described as the angle difference between does not indicate their real position due to the a light beam in two different inertial reference relative speed of the observer and that of light. frames. Relativistic effects can be included in James Bradley proposed an explanation for this a study to enrich its analysis [4]. Thus, for ex- phenomenon as early as 1727, considering the ample, the aberration has been related to rel- movement of Earth in relation to the Sun [1, 2]. ativistic Doppler shifts and relativistic velocity In 1905, presented an analysis addition [5], light-time correction [6], simultane- of the aberration of light from the perspective ity [7], Kerr spacetime [8], light refraction [9], of the special , in the con- arXiv:2104.01492v2 [physics.pop-ph] 1 May 2021 gravitational lensing [10], etc. text of which this phenomenon has been investi- We carried out a combined study of the phe- gated through a series of practical and specula- nomenon of the relativistic aberration of light ∗[email protected] (RAL) and the principles of special relativity †[email protected] (SR), obtaining transforms comparable to the ‡[email protected] Lorentz transforms (LTs). As a consequence

1 of this combination, we obtain a transformation factor very similar to that of the Lorentz factor (LF); these factors largely coincide in terms of their results (calculations), but the new factor presents some additional significant characteris- tics. According to Dingel et al. [11], when dif- ferent relativistic effects are combined “it is well- known that richer and bizarre SR behaviors are produced.” In our case, we will just show some results of theoretical interest.

1.1 An analysis combining the princi- Figure 1: Location of a light pulse in relation to ples of special relativity and the two inertial frames. aberration of light 2 Methodology Figure 1 can represent two situations. The first involves (a) a pulse of light that starts from the We resort to a thought experiment that is com- origin of reference frame S with an angle α and mon in studies of SR. We assume two inertial ref- which after a time t is at location P. This same erence frames: S considered at rest and S’ with pulse from reference frame S’ has an angle α0. (b) inertial motion and velocity v. We can also interpret P as representing an emit- We assume that when the origin O’ of S’ co- ter focus that can be perceived from two inertial incides with the origin O of S at the instant frames S and S’, the first at rest and the second t0 = t = 0, a pulse of light is emitted from this in relative inertial motion. The first scenario is origin O with an angle α in the direction of point the typical one established to derive the LT, and P. After a time t > 0, S’ will have traveled a dis- the second is used to analyze the phenomenon tance vt from the perspective of S and vt0 from of the RAL. In this paper, we will undertake the the perspective of S’. This implies that for S’, exercise of analyzing the two issues together. the angle of the trajectory of the light pulse is 0 Since 1905, many methods of derivation of the α , which due to considerations of the relativis- LT have been investigated that have enriched our tic postulates cannot be derived geometrically understanding. We undertake a derivation based directly from Figure 1. on the two principles of SR, that is, the princi- To derive the transformation equations that ple of relativity and the constancy of the speed allow us to convert the measures of S into those of light—or more specifically the “inertial invari- of S’, the following equations are initially pro- ance of the speed of propagation of electromag- posed: netic radiation in vacuum” [12]—considering the special case described in Figure 1, which implic- 0 itly involves the phenomenon of RAL. x = γx + δt (1)

2 0 t0 = αx + βt (2) x = γx − γvt (7)

The objective is to obtain the values of the four coefficients (γ, δ, α, and β) of equations (1) and x0 = γ(x − vt) (8) (2) by identifying special “known” cases 1 con- cordant with the postulates of special relativity. By the first postulate, the relationship must Each special case is applied to these equations, be the same (same transformation factor from and subsequently, the values of the coefficients any of the reference frames). Therefore, are obtained for general use.

x = γ(x0 + vt0) (9) 3 Derivation of relativistic Special case 2: transformations We can obtain the second special case from the second postulate: c = c0. Special case 1: Generally, The origin O’ from S’ will always be at x0 = 0, while for S it will be at x = vt. r = ct (10)

x0 = 0 (3)

r0 = ct0 (11)

x = vt (4) It should be noted in Figure 1 that the path r > r0, therefore ct > ct0. And since c is a con- 0 Replacing (3) and (4) in (1): stant, it geometrically suggests that t > t . Its components on the X-axis are

0 = γvt + δt (5) x = cosα ct (12) from where

x0 = cosα0 ct0 (13) δ = −γv (6) We isolate from (12) and (13) the time vari- Replacing in (1) ables

1Expression used in http://web.mst.edu/ x ~hale/courses/physics_357_457/notes/Lecture. t = (14) 3.Relativity.Lorentz.Invariance/Lecture3.pdf cosα c

3 0 0 x 1 t = 0 (15) γL = r (21) cosα c  v2  1 − 2 We substitute, respectively, in (8) and (9) c

vx v 3.1 Relationship between angles of x0 = γ(x − ) = γx(1 − ) (16) cosα c cosα c aberration A limitation of the ARF (19) is that we do not vx0 v yet have a formula for the transformation be- x = γ(x0 + ) = γx0(1 + ) (17) 0 cosα0 c cosα0 c tween the angles α and α . This relationship can be established with the following analysis: We multiply these equations: According to Figure 1, in which

 v   v  x0x = γ2xx0 1 − 1 + (18) y cosα c cosα0 c tanα = (22) x0 And we obtain since there is no relative motion in the direc- tion of the Y-axis, then 1 γR = q (19) 1 − v  + v  cosα c cosα0 c y = y0 = sinα0 ct0 (23) We include the subscript R (γ ) to this rela- R According to (9), tivistic transformation factor (19) derived from aberration concepts to differentiate it from the Lorentz factor (LF) that we refer to with γ . 0 0 L x = γR(x + vt ) (24) Since this transformation factor includes the aberration angles α and α0, we call it the alterna- Substituting (13) in (24), tive relativistic factor (ARF), which differs from the LF traditionally present in the literature. 0 0 0 Based on the assumptions of this derivation, x = γR(cosα ct + vt ) (25) the ARF can be applied to any aberration angles Substituting (23) and (25) in (22), α and α0, whereas LF corresponds only to the special case where α = α0 = 0◦, which implies that cosα = cosα0 = 1 and thus obtains the LF sinα0 ct0 tanα = 0 0 0 (26) (γL) usually used in studies on RAL [9, 5]: γR(cosα ct + vt )

1 0 γL = q (20) sinα v  v  tanα = 0 (27) 1 − ◦ + ◦ 0 vt cos0 c cos0 c γR(cosα + ct0 )

4 sinα0 tanα = 0 v (28) γR(cosα + c )

This equation is remarkably similar to the usual functional form in the relativistic litera- ture, with the difference that the LF is replaced by the new ARF γR. If we combine (19) with (28), we get

tanα tanα0 p v = p v (29) 1 − cosα c 1 + cosα0 c Figure 2: Possible trajectories of the light pulse according to the quadrants of the reference For comparative purposes, what has been frames hitherto analyzed is summarized in Table 1.

cosα + v cos α0 = c (30) 1 v γ = = 1.0483 1 + c cosα L r  0.32c2  1 − c2 It should be noted that in the literature, it is common to find equation (30) used to estab- According to (28), lish the relationship between the indicated angles [13, 3]. This equation provides the same calcu- lations as the CSE combined; however, we use sin40◦ tanα = = 0.57519 the equations in Table 1 because this allows us ◦ 0.3c 1.0483(cos40 + c ) to analyze the results of the two transformation factors. If we calculate the previous variables using the As can be seen, in the CSE the transforma- PSE (equations (19) and (28)) resorting to nu- tion factor corresponds to the LF and does not merical analysis, we obtain the same previous ◦ depend on the angles involved in the RAL, while values. That is, α = 29.90717 and γR = γL = in the PSE it does. However, as we will discuss 1.0483. below, this does not necessarily lead to different In general, once the calculations have been results—at least not always. made, the two systems of equations provide the Thus, for example, if we consider a velocity same results; this suggests that (21) can be de- v = 0.3c and an angle α0 = 40◦ in S’, these rived by combining (19) and (28); however, the data must correspond to an angle α < α0 by PSE presents some novelties. observation of Figure 1. The first novelty is that the PSE has two real According to (21), solutions for the transformation factor γR in all

5 Table 1: Current (CSE) and proposed system of equations (PSE) for relativistic aberration. System of equations: Current (CSE) Proposed (PSE) sinα0 sinα0 Angle relationships tanα =  v  tanα =  v  γ cosα0 + γ cosα0 + L c R c 1 1 Transformation factors γL = s γR = r  v2   v   v  1 − 1 − + 0 c2 cosα c cosα c cases. The first solution always matches the val- value of the cosine. It should be noted that the 0 ues obtained by the CSE (γR = γL). The sec- above values coincide when v = −cosα c and ond solution has a behavior that depends on v = cosα c, respectively. the quadrant in which point P is located, as On the other hand, when P is in the first quad- can be seen in Figure 2. Thus, in the exam- rant of S and the second of S’ (P2), the PSE ple cited above, in which the velocity v = 0.3c presents two solutions. As in the previous case, and an angle α0 = 40◦ in S’, the first solution the first also matches the CSE results. Thus, ◦ 0 ◦ was α = 29.90717 and γR = 1.0483, coinciding for example, when v = 0.3c and α = 100 , it with the CSE; however, it also corresponds to corresponds to α = 82.3399◦ and a transforma- ◦ the values α = 220 and γR = 0.718586. As can tion factor γR = γL = 1.04828, but it also corre- be seen, this angle implies that the trajectories sponds to a second solution, α = 80◦ and a trans- are parallel in opposite directions. formation factor ARF γR = 1.37432. In this In general, when the light pulse is in the first case, when it comes to P2 the second solution 0 quadrant of S and S’ (P1 in Figure 2) or when corresponds to supplementary angles (α + α = ◦ it is in the second quadrant of S and S’ (P3), 180 ). Again, speculatively, these results sug- the second solution corresponds to a parallel tra- gest that as an effect of relativistic aberration jectory in the opposite direction. Speculating a celestial object may have an apparent double on the physical interpretation, these results may location. suggest that as an effect of relativistic aberra- tion, an object in the cosmos can be perceived 3.2 The time transformation in two apparent positions at the same time, one For the case of the RAL, we previously obtained of them fully coinciding with the traditional pre- the ARF in such a way that we can substitute dictions of the SR. (19) in (9): The PSE is indeterminate when the light pulse travels along the Y-axis or the Y’-axis—that is, (x0 + vt0) when the angle α = 90◦ or when α0 = 90◦—since x = (31) p(1 − v )(1 + v ) the radicand of the root of the denominator cosα c cosα0 c of the factor becomes infinite due to the zero Substituting (12) and (13) in (31),

6 cosα0 ct0 + vt0 cosα ct = p v v (32) (1 − cosα c )(1 + cosα0 c )

cosα0 0 vt0 cosα t + cosα c t = p v v (33) (1 − cosα c )(1 + cosα0 c ) Substituting (15) in the second term of the numerator, this can also be expressed by

cosα0 0 1 vx0 cosα t + cosα cosα0 c2 t = p v v (34) (1 − cosα c )(1 + cosα0 c ) Figure 3: Location of a light pulse with trajec- tories with similar angles (v = 1/2 cosα ct) From the perspective of this derivation equa- tion (34), like (19), can be applied to any aber- ration angles α and α0. We can obtain equa- must exist a location of P where α = α2, which tion (36), the transformation of the time of the implies that α0 = 180◦ − α. This isosceles tri- usual TLs, when we consider only the special angle actually corresponds to two right triangles case where α = α0 = 0◦, which implies that (PMO and PMO’), each relative to each frame cosα = cosα0 = 1. of reference; however, it allows us to conduct a joint analysis.

◦ 0 According to the previous assumptions, ( cos0 t0 + 1 vx ) t = cos0◦ cos0◦cos0◦ c2 (35) p(1 − v )(1 + v ) cos0◦ c cos0◦ c cosα = −cosα0 (37)

0 From (33), (t0 + vx ) t = c2 (36) q 2 (1 − v ) 0 cosα0 v c2 t ( cosα + cosα c ) t = p v v (38) (1 − cosα c )(1 + cosα0 c ) 3.3 The case of relativistic aberration of light when α = 180◦ − α0. Substituting (37) in (38):

Analyzing Figure 3, it is observed that between 0 v t (−1 + cosα c ) P and the origins of S and S’ a triangle is formed t = v (39) |1 − cosα c | in which the angles α and α2 depend on the lo- cation of P. If P is closer to the Y’-axis, then According to Figure 3, v > cosα c (P is be- α > α2; if it is closer to the Y-axis, then α < α2. tween the two Y-axes), so the value of the numer- Therefore, it is feasible to assume that there ator parentheses of (39) will be positive. Thus,

7 singularity at v/c = 1”. These additional char- acteristics, in agreement with the RAL, deter- t = t0 (40) mine that the PSE shows a relative anisotropic behavior of the ARF, partially coinciding with This result can be explained if we look at Fig- the results of Jin and Lazar [16]. ure 3 and remember the usual idea of the light- clock that uses “the distance traveled by a pulse of light and the known to mark out 4 Conclusions intervals of time” [14]. The common example assumes that α0 = 90◦, which implies that the In this paper, we have analyzed whether the greater distance of the path (hypotenuse) of the Lorentz factor (LF) used in special relativity light pulse corresponds to S. However, any exam- should be applied when it comes to the phe- ple should be equally valid, and in our case when nomenon of the relativistic aberration of light, the two angles are equal the conclusion is that concluding that in this case, the alternative rel- the two paths are also equal (r = r0). Therefore, ativistic factor (ARF) that we derived here in it is intuited that the equality of (40) is admis- principle provides the same results as the LF; sible (clock-rate), although only for the case of nevertheless, it mathematically allows for second the aberration of light and when α0 = 180◦ − α. solutions depending on the quadrant in which Obviously, this theoretical result should be sup- the emitter focus is located. A particularly im- ported with empirical evidence. portant novelty is that the derived ARF allows the reference frames involved to move at speeds 3.4 Faster than the speed of light v > c greater than that of light. This study is developed in the context of the An important novelty of the ARF, unlike the LF, relativistic aberration phenomenon, and the sys- is that it allows relative speeds v greater than tem of equations derived includes the angles of those of light, although it is not new that in the the light trajectories as variables. Obviously, it literature we find some studies that in the con- can be assumed that there are other cases of in- text of SR, general relativity, or quantum physics ertial motion that do not involve pulses of light; allow us to infer speeds faster than that of light however, typical relativistic studies cannot dis- [15, 16], particularly concerning the case of neu- pense with this assumption since it is the only trinos that may be tachyons [17, 18]. way to mathematize the second postulate of spe- Thus, for example, according to ARF if the cial relativity: the constancy of the speed of speed of the frame S’ is v = 1.2c and the an- light. In this sense, we can ask ourselves if it gle α0 = 100◦, an angle α = 80◦ corresponds to is feasible for these equations to be extrapolated it—that is, they are supplementary angles—and to a more general context. In any case, it must in this case, γR = 0.16919. In this sense, it is be remembered that a large portion of the empir- possible to speculate a little more about the pos- ical evidence that supports the predictions of the sibility of hypothetical tachyons [19]. It should Lorentz transformations does not contradict the also be noted that coinciding with Ehrlich, the proposed system of equations since the two sys- values of the ARF “are not symmetric about the tems coincide in their mathematical estimates.

8 An important characteristic of the proposed J of Physics Education 5 1, 51-58 (2014). systems of equations (PSE) is that it does not [2] J H Sweeney, Einstein’s dreams, The Re- prevent the possibility of speeds greater than view of Metaphysics 17 4, 811-834 (2014). that of light, offering speculative opportunities for the hypothetical tachyons that are addressed [3] K Van Acoleyen , J Van Doorsselaere, Cap- in the literature, as Schwartz [17, 18] does to tain Einstein: A VR experience of relativ- eventually explain dark energy and dark matter ity, American Journal of Physics, 88 10, pp. using low energy neutrinos as tachyons. 801-813, (2020) Finally, the fact that as a consequence of the relativistic aberration the PSE establishes two [4] J P Zhu, B Zhang , Y P Yang, Relativistic solutions can be interpreted as the possibility of Astronomy. II. In-flight Solution of Motion observing two images of the same celestial body, and Test of Special Relativity Light Aberra- a phenomenon that occurs with certain quasars tion, The Astrophysical Journal, 877 1, 1-8, due to the gravitational lens, to mention just (2019). one example. [5] P Saari , I Besieris, Relativistic aberration and null Doppler shift within the framework of superluminal and subluminal nondiffract- Author Contributions: Conceptualization, ing waves, Journal of Physics Communica- D.R.; methodology, D.R.; software, F.R.; valida- tions, 4, 1-10, (2020) tion, R.S.; formal analysis, D.R. and R.S.; inves- tigation, D.R. and F.R.; writing—original draft [6] R R Karimi , D Mortari, Interplanetary preparation, D.R.; writing—review and editing, Autonomous Navigation, Journal of Guid- R.S. and F.R.; supervision, F.R. All authors ance, Control, and Dynamics, 38 6, 1151- have read and agreed to the published version 56, (2015) of the manuscript. [7] A Gjurchinovski, Relativistic aberration of Funding: This research received no external light as a corollary of the relativity of simul- funding. taneity, European Journal of Physics, 27 4, Data Availability Statement: Not appli- 703-708, (2006) cable. Acknowledgements: The authors thank Es- [8] H Arakida, General Relativistic Aberration teban Samaniego for his comments and recom- Equation and Measurable Angle of Light mendations. Ray in Kerr Spacetime, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics D, 2021. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. [9] A Gjurchinovski, Aberration of light in a uniformly moving optical medium, Amer- ican Journal of Physics, 72 7, 934-940, References (2004) [1] T Shivalingaswamy, P. Rashm, I am the [10] M Sereno, Aberration in gravitational lens- Speed of Light c, You ’see’ .....!, European ing, Physical Review D, 78 8, 1-9, (2008)

9 [11] B Dingel, A Buenaventura, A Chua, N Li- batique , K Murakawa, Relativistic aber- ration of light mimicked by microring res- onator based optical All-Pass Filter (APF), Optik, 183 82-91, (2019) [12] W N Mathews, Seven formulations of the kinematics of special relativity, American Journal of Physics, 88 269-278, (2020) [13] A Jarabo, B Masia, A Velten, C Barsi, R Raskar , D Gutierrez, Relativistic Effects for Time-Resolved Light Transport, Computer Graphics Forum, 34 8, 1-12, (2015) [14] W B Stannard, A new model of special relativity and the relationship between the time warps of general and special relativity, Physics Education, 53, 1-9, (2018) [15] J M Hill , B J Cox, Einstein’s special rela- tivity beyond the speed of light, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 468, 4174–4192, (2012) [16] C Jin, M Lazar, A note on Lorentz-like transformations and superluminal motion, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Me- chanics, 95 7, 690-694, (2015) [17] C Schwartz, Tachyon dynamics for neu- trinos?, International Journal of Modern Physics A, 33 10, 1-23, (2018) [18] C Schwartz, An approach for modeling tachyons with gravitation, International Journal of Modern Physics A, 34 19, 1-18, (2019) [19] R Ehrlich, Faster-than-light speeds, tachyons, and the possibility of tachy- onic neutrinos, American Journal of Physics, 71, 1109-1114, (2003)

10