Arxiv:2104.01492V2 [Physics.Pop-Ph] 1 May 2021 Gravitational Lensing [10], Etc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
An alternative transformation factor in the framework of the relativistic aberration of light D Rold´an1,∗ R Sempertegui,† F Rold´an‡ 1University of Cuenca Abstract In the present study, we analyze in combination the principles of special relativity and the phenomenon of the aberration of light, deriving a system of equations that allows establishing the relationship between the angles commonly involved in this phenomenon. As a consequence, a transformation factor is obtained that generates two solutions, one of them with the same values as the Lorentz factor. This suggests that due to relativistic aberration, an apparent double image of celestial objects could be obtained. On the other hand, its functional form does not establish a limit to the speed of the reference frames with inertial movement. Keywords: relativistic aberration, alternative Lorentz transformations, faster than light 1 Introduction tive studies with didactic interest [3], with this study falling into the latter category. The aberration of light is a phenomenon in as- The phenomenon of the aberration of light tronomy in which the location of celestial objects can be described as the angle difference between does not indicate their real position due to the a light beam in two different inertial reference relative speed of the observer and that of light. frames. Relativistic effects can be included in James Bradley proposed an explanation for this a study to enrich its analysis [4]. Thus, for ex- phenomenon as early as 1727, considering the ample, the aberration has been related to rel- movement of Earth in relation to the Sun [1, 2]. ativistic Doppler shifts and relativistic velocity In 1905, Albert Einstein presented an analysis addition [5], light-time correction [6], simultane- of the aberration of light from the perspective ity [7], Kerr spacetime [8], light refraction [9], of the special theory of relativity, in the con- arXiv:2104.01492v2 [physics.pop-ph] 1 May 2021 gravitational lensing [10], etc. text of which this phenomenon has been investi- We carried out a combined study of the phe- gated through a series of practical and specula- nomenon of the relativistic aberration of light ∗[email protected] (RAL) and the principles of special relativity †[email protected] (SR), obtaining transforms comparable to the ‡[email protected] Lorentz transforms (LTs). As a consequence 1 of this combination, we obtain a transformation factor very similar to that of the Lorentz factor (LF); these factors largely coincide in terms of their results (calculations), but the new factor presents some additional significant characteris- tics. According to Dingel et al. [11], when dif- ferent relativistic effects are combined \it is well- known that richer and bizarre SR behaviors are produced." In our case, we will just show some results of theoretical interest. 1.1 An analysis combining the princi- Figure 1: Location of a light pulse in relation to ples of special relativity and the two inertial frames. aberration of light 2 Methodology Figure 1 can represent two situations. The first involves (a) a pulse of light that starts from the We resort to a thought experiment that is com- origin of reference frame S with an angle α and mon in studies of SR. We assume two inertial ref- which after a time t is at location P. This same erence frames: S considered at rest and S' with pulse from reference frame S' has an angle α0. (b) inertial motion and velocity v. We can also interpret P as representing an emit- We assume that when the origin O' of S' co- ter focus that can be perceived from two inertial incides with the origin O of S at the instant frames S and S', the first at rest and the second t0 = t = 0, a pulse of light is emitted from this in relative inertial motion. The first scenario is origin O with an angle α in the direction of point the typical one established to derive the LT, and P. After a time t > 0, S' will have traveled a dis- the second is used to analyze the phenomenon tance vt from the perspective of S and vt0 from of the RAL. In this paper, we will undertake the the perspective of S'. This implies that for S', exercise of analyzing the two issues together. the angle of the trajectory of the light pulse is 0 Since 1905, many methods of derivation of the α , which due to considerations of the relativis- LT have been investigated that have enriched our tic postulates cannot be derived geometrically understanding. We undertake a derivation based directly from Figure 1. on the two principles of SR, that is, the princi- To derive the transformation equations that ple of relativity and the constancy of the speed allow us to convert the measures of S into those of light|or more specifically the \inertial invari- of S', the following equations are initially pro- ance of the speed of propagation of electromag- posed: netic radiation in vacuum" [12]|considering the special case described in Figure 1, which implic- 0 itly involves the phenomenon of RAL. x = γx + δt (1) 2 0 t0 = αx + βt (2) x = γx − γvt (7) The objective is to obtain the values of the four coefficients (γ; δ; α, and β) of equations (1) and x0 = γ(x − vt) (8) (2) by identifying special \known" cases 1 con- cordant with the postulates of special relativity. By the first postulate, the relationship must Each special case is applied to these equations, be the same (same transformation factor from and subsequently, the values of the coefficients any of the reference frames). Therefore, are obtained for general use. x = γ(x0 + vt0) (9) 3 Derivation of relativistic Special case 2: transformations We can obtain the second special case from the second postulate: c = c0. Special case 1: Generally, The origin O' from S' will always be at x0 = 0, while for S it will be at x = vt. r = ct (10) x0 = 0 (3) r0 = ct0 (11) x = vt (4) It should be noted in Figure 1 that the path r > r0, therefore ct > ct0. And since c is a con- 0 Replacing (3) and (4) in (1): stant, it geometrically suggests that t > t . Its components on the X-axis are 0 = γvt + δt (5) x = cosα ct (12) from where x0 = cosα0 ct0 (13) δ = −γv (6) We isolate from (12) and (13) the time vari- Replacing in (1) ables 1Expression used in http://web.mst.edu/ x ~hale/courses/physics_357_457/notes/Lecture. t = (14) 3.Relativity.Lorentz.Invariance/Lecture3.pdf cosα c 3 0 0 x 1 t = 0 (15) γL = r (21) cosα c v2 1 − 2 We substitute, respectively, in (8) and (9) c vx v 3.1 Relationship between angles of x0 = γ(x − ) = γx(1 − ) (16) cosα c cosα c aberration A limitation of the ARF (19) is that we do not vx0 v yet have a formula for the transformation be- x = γ(x0 + ) = γx0(1 + ) (17) 0 cosα0 c cosα0 c tween the angles α and α . This relationship can be established with the following analysis: We multiply these equations: According to Figure 1, in which v v x0x = γ2xx0 1 − 1 + (18) y cosα c cosα0 c tanα = (22) x0 And we obtain since there is no relative motion in the direc- tion of the Y-axis, then 1 γR = q (19) 1 − v + v cosα c cosα0 c y = y0 = sinα0 ct0 (23) We include the subscript R (γ ) to this rela- R According to (9), tivistic transformation factor (19) derived from aberration concepts to differentiate it from the Lorentz factor (LF) that we refer to with γ . 0 0 L x = γR(x + vt ) (24) Since this transformation factor includes the aberration angles α and α0, we call it the alterna- Substituting (13) in (24), tive relativistic factor (ARF), which differs from the LF traditionally present in the literature. 0 0 0 Based on the assumptions of this derivation, x = γR(cosα ct + vt ) (25) the ARF can be applied to any aberration angles Substituting (23) and (25) in (22), α and α0, whereas LF corresponds only to the special case where α = α0 = 0◦, which implies that cosα = cosα0 = 1 and thus obtains the LF sinα0 ct0 tanα = 0 0 0 (26) (γL) usually used in studies on RAL [9, 5]: γR(cosα ct + vt ) 1 0 γL = q (20) sinα v v tanα = 0 (27) 1 − ◦ + ◦ 0 vt cos0 c cos0 c γR(cosα + ct0 ) 4 sinα0 tanα = 0 v (28) γR(cosα + c ) This equation is remarkably similar to the usual functional form in the relativistic litera- ture, with the difference that the LF is replaced by the new ARF γR. If we combine (19) with (28), we get tanα tanα0 p v = p v (29) 1 − cosα c 1 + cosα0 c Figure 2: Possible trajectories of the light pulse according to the quadrants of the reference For comparative purposes, what has been frames hitherto analyzed is summarized in Table 1. cosα + v cos α0 = c (30) 1 v γ = = 1:0483 1 + c cosα L r 0:32c2 1 − c2 It should be noted that in the literature, it is common to find equation (30) used to estab- According to (28), lish the relationship between the indicated angles [13, 3]. This equation provides the same calcu- lations as the CSE combined; however, we use sin40◦ tanα = = 0:57519 the equations in Table 1 because this allows us ◦ 0:3c 1:0483(cos40 + c ) to analyze the results of the two transformation factors.