T"* G Rrfr,N Gonrrrt'rn/ ISSN :1476-5314 April 2002 Issue No.1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
,/t"* g rrfr,n gonrrrt'rn/ ISSN :1476-5314 April 2002 Issue No.1 \\essdalen: Scicnce vs lhe Ufa case closed ? - Sdifrn -'Xfl['t n oz ha'n'& Milrne h fl'e WPAy ,&ho oc li,a fume :-- frennla Aryono** ; - g E il ol %/nk /"d alo 1illie,n ",4oh/aot ? %,il/z.r&a.// Q4aloiae;,-{ {' ;n ?orVr^ilt u/da,b 9/w A ea.t/o a/ a(.alagal ? ?aa h /wt e lia fumn; Ql/awnt. ,t l'u.o !18 tt/bi o /lau u./ ISSN : 1476 - 5314 Apri} 2002 Issue No.1 -&ry$ers€ nri!! ufD li;r3rrl ,i:ocbu'r The British UFO Research Association is a Company limited by Guarantee. The Registered office is at t Butora 1td.,70, High Street, WINGHAN.4, Kent, CT3 1BJ Ielephone i 01227 7229 16 E.mail : enquiries(abutora.orq.uk Web : hftpJ/www.bufora.oro.uk Ufocall : 09068 121886 ( Premium BT Rates apply ) Dir. Research E.mail:JohtandAnne@ pamnormalworldwide. Dir. Investieations Heather Dixon Tel :0191 236 8375 E.mail : [email protected] London Office BM Bufora, London, WCIN 3XX Editorial Enquiries NBJ Office, C/o Evolution, P.O. Box 633, Beaconsfield, HP9 2GL [email protected] This Jou.nal is Copyright Bufora Ltd., and views expressed are those ofthe author and not the company. lt is published by Bufora Ltd., and is free to members. lt is produced in digitaltormat and printed by: Parchment, Crescent Road, Cowley, Oxford, OX4 2PB Tel | 01865747547 E.mail ; Dioital(AParchmentuk.com Web : wwuPrintuk.com ,lltitty 2oo2 llrontn/n 6i/"lrb, ..1'c", ,'8t1r,,7r",,"tr/ .'/;.yre t ,rytlnq 2t,ttt '/' rutr/t {, r/i/t.,tr EDITORIAL I Pade l- t1 lEdltorlaL - la -cont".t"I Proj ect Hessdalen 11 WiIlenhalI Wat chers 13 Remote Ove rvie\t Hello Everyone, 15 Artifact or What ? 18 What' s Your Opinion ? Firstly, a big'Thank You'to Brian James for 2A Points from the pres s producing the BUFOM BULLETTN' during 23 A Twin pupils his tenure as Editor. The positions of update Chairman and Editor are each time- 2'7 Book Reviews consuming and challengjng on their own, and 28 U fo rum to have taken on both was a really tough task. 30 The Death of U fo logy Brian has also had to stand down as Chairman ahead of the AGM. This is for personal reasons but he remains a member of Bufora and we hope he will continue to help out behind the scenes. I am assuming the role I last filled between 1976 and 1981. I know there are members from that period who will recollect my'stint' and be aware of my own approach to our subject. For more rec€nt members I feel I can ,CnIg[nieqrql!\sdus$"' do no better than reproduce selected paragraphs from earlier editorials. Bear in mind, though, that whilst my personat proclivities remain unaltered, several This may varied refe€nces are considerably well involve such dated........................So.......... representatives of opinion as BUFOM, The Aetherius Sociely, The Ministry of Defence, Aunty Aggie, who's just From the Autumn 1973 issue....... seen a funny light wobbling about. An 'expert' who tells us 'saucers' can't exist because not "lt is ofren suggested, and on they're occasion I have aerodynamic and a schoolboy who thinks wondered myself,'ndeed whether it we're in jmminent might be that media items/articles featuring danger of a Martian invasionl UFOS are biased against the serious Research Associations: are poking fun or are Small wonder that in the midst 'out to get us', but is this really so? of this set-up we're a small voice crying in the wilderness, but, in my opinion, it is NOT a deliberate We must remember that we - not unnaturally have vested interest attempt to denigrate UFO research......the - a in the way a posl. programme is put out; the way in which too - letters aren t delivered: they arrive an late: who what responsible? article is written. To the producer or feature or is Affer considerable writer, BUFOM or any other Society is just thought my conclusion is - The Post Office! You'll lind percentage one tacet of the UFO scene. A TV producer the of mail to ufologists going astray needs lo obtain what he or she regards as 'a is near enough the balanced programme'. same as that sent to everyone elsel . li"r.tt),fn '/,.",t,n/ :/-n. / - :ry,nry tt !'/trrrtul f li/hn Let us slop imagining and complaining of 'UFO Believef tag immediately suggests not being singled out for 'anti-Us' treatment by just a'belief in UFOs, but also recognition THEM, whoever THEM may be and instead they are extra-terrestrial vehicles, which does exert our energies into channels that will not necessarily follow. Certainly I admit I show the authorities and media we are a would LIKE this to be so, but we must always body to be consulted and respected in the .emember that if the answer to the UFO field of Ufology. enigma were known and accepted there would be no need for us to research anylvayl From July/August 1 976...... Hypotheses abound and, to give just one example, neither should we neglect "One of BUFORA'S aims is to encourage and implications raised by the not-inconsiderable promote unbiased scientific research into number of cases evincing psychic effects of UFO phenomena. Few will quibble at this - associations. Do YOU believe in UFOs? certainly I have no such quibble myself. But - a point made on one of the 'INTO THE Back to the presenl. As we all know, UNKNOWN' TV programmes some months researchers generally - and that includes ME, ago sticks in my mind. lt was said it is rare for will tell you that the vast majority of UFOS those with apparent psychic or telepathic reporled - between 90% and 97% according abilities to be able to produce these or their lo the researcher, ARE explainable. However, results under controlled scientiflc conditions, that still leaves one heck of a lot of and the suggestion was put forward that such 'unexplainables', and many display phenomena may not be susceptible to characteristics of solid craft - whether scientific investigation, or perhaps even the spacecrafl or otheMise! so far as contacts, scientific method itself - Could this also be abductions, time lapses etc. are concerned, the case with UFOs?...and, if scientific let me jusl say I have at least a dozen friends method be abandoned, how then to proceed? here and in the USA who lay claim to at least ONE such experience and I have no reason Stemming from the Latin scire - to know or to believe they're fabricating. discern, the word 'scientist' literally means 'one who seeks to know'. lts origins give no Perhaps the only thing I do NOT believe in - indication of how to pursue this - we have despite a current nod of approval from the formulated our own methods. lf - and it's a O.E.D. is - splitting infinitives. One big 'lF such methods do NoT apply in certain exception, though --' To boldly go where cases, including UFOS, then what method of no-one has gone before'! enquiry should replace them? Any suggestions? ln a 'Farewell' message after editing 30 Journal issues I wrote in the first ever From Jan/Feb 1979...... BUFORA BULLETIN of September 1981........ Are you a UFO 'Believer'. Well, are you? Do you? These questions a.e frequently put to "......Maybe at a future date when problems me when lecturing or being interviewed, and of time and finance are resolved I may once my answer is 'No'. But before anyone, not to again have the pleasure - for despite the time put too fine a point on it, demands my guts for involved it has been a pleasure - ot again garters, let me elaborate.'No', lsay,'l'm not editing the BUFORA Journal in a format a UFO Believer - using the word in that similar to the one it has hitherto maintained sense implies an act of faith and I don't take since its inception in '1964....' them on faith. Rather I consider there is sufficient evidence to show UFOS DO exist. Well, twenty years on that'future date'has lndeed, such evidence in only ONE case is arrived. I've taken the liberty of changing enough not to have to bring Faith into it! The 'Bulletin'back to'Journal', but with a'NEW . lir ,'/)ry'in,/trri ttrr/ ../.t.yu,t .'/f inq 2t,tt2t/hun {; r/irt?,n addition.'Bu,letin' was, I know, generally regarded as being somewhat ephemeral and UFOS AIIO THE PSI INTEN,FACE understaling, but no-one came up with a satisfactory substitute other than 'Jou.nal,. So By Manfred Cassirer, Stephen Gamble, - the. l h r .'/)rf, to,//t,u i rlr / it shal be. Elsie Oakensen and John One last point. Since I last held the editorial ln this publication, four contributors - all of rerns. ll.e productton side of lhings has whom have diffe.ent backgrounds and altered dramalically and twould tike to say a viewpoints into the subject - have assembled personal 'Ihank You'to Bob Digby for the current ideas on the possible amounl of assistance he has given, and is still interaction/crossover between UFO reports giving in this area. and PSI experiences. NORI\,1AN OLIVER Manfred Cassirer presents a research paper - UFOS and the -o0o- PSI lnterface - in which examines the main lheories revolving around the subjects. ew Publication ! Stephen Gamble (who has carried out many roles for BUFORA) compares UFO and psychic Entities.