NC Water and Energy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapel Hill 2020 Comprehensive Plan
Chapel Hill 2020 Comprehensive Plan Draft: Last Revised: May 16, 2012 Cover art by Sarah Mitchell, winner of Chapel Hill 2020 Art Contest, grade 10-12 category. Table of Contents Credits Community Vision ..........................................................................................1 How to Use This Plan ....................................................................................3 PART 1: The Chapel Hill Story ....................................................................5 Chapter 1: Community Choices and Connections ............................9 Chapter 2: Outreach E!orts ................................................................13 PART 2: The Plan ..........................................................................................15 Chapter 3: Council Implementation and Policy Guidance ...........19 Chapter 4: Themes, Goals, and Actions ...........................................29 Section 1: Themes and Goals ........................................................ 31 Section 2: Themes, Goals, and Actions ..................................... 43 Chapter 5: Future Focus Discussion Areas ......................................75 Area 1: Downtown ............................................................................78 Area 2: North Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd/I-40 .......................80 Area 3: South Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd/ Homestead Road to Estes Drive ....................................82 Area 4: Highway 54 ........................................................................84 Area -
39668 Curs 50Th History.Indd
TTHEHE CCENTERENTER FFOROR UUrbanrban & RRegionalegional SStudiestudies THE FIRST YEARS 50 A history published in celebration of the 50th anniversary of The Center for Urban & Regional Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill TTHEHE CCENTERENTER FFOROR UUrbanrban & RegionalRegional StudiesStudies THE FIRST YEARS 50 The Center for Urban and Regional Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill conducts and supports research on urban and regional affairs—research that helps to build healthy, sustainable communities across the country and around the world. The Center’s Faculty Fellows—all leading scholars in their respective fi elds—participate in both multidisciplinary research and more narrowly focused projects to generate new knowledge about urban and regional processes, problems and solutions. By supporting this network of scholars and connecting them to government agencies and foundations that commission research, the Center plays a vital role in linking the University community to ongoing efforts to address contemporary social problems. Ordering Information This report can be downloaded free of charge from our website: http://www.unc.edu/depts/curs. For more information, call 919.843.9708 or email [email protected]. Copyright© 2008 by The Center for Urban and Regional Studies, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. All rights reserved. ISBN 0-9728693-9-7 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Special thanks to Debra Hill, Dorothy Keith, and Anne Patrone for their efforts to create this publication. The Center extends its thanks to the following individuals who gave interviews so that we could put together this history of the Center: Asta Crowe, Dave Godschalk, Ed Kaiser, Michael Stegman. -
The North Carolina Botanical Garden at 50
A Conservation Garden: The North Carolina Botanical Garden at 50 (1966-2016) Volume I Researched, compiled, and written by the North Carolina Botanical Garden Greenbriers February 2019 To the visionaries who came before us, the pragmatists who carried the vision forward, and the allies yet to come; and to past, present, and future seekers who find inspiration, encouragement, and solace at the North Carolina Botanical Garden. FOREWORD One would be hard pressed to walk into any botanical garden in the world and come across a compendium of historical information as complete as this one. What is even more amazing is that this compilation of the Garden’s 50-year history was authored by volunteers! Calling themselves the Greenbriers, this dedicated group of 12, under the able leadership of Joanne Lott, has spent countless hours researching, fact checking, and writing the definitive guide to the first 50 years of the North Carolina Botanical Garden. As you peruse Volume I from the Introduction to the Reference Timeline, perhaps even delve into the Volume II appendices, you will quickly come to the realization that this history goes much deeper than the last 50 years. Indeed, the story of the North Carolina Botanical Garden is the botanical legacy of the University of North Carolina, the nation’s oldest public university. Like the entangling Greenbrier vine, the two have been intertwined and inseparable since 1903 when the University’s first professor of botany, William Chambers Coker, established a teaching collection of trees and shrubs on campus which later became the Coker Arboretum. The Garden has many other branches that can trace their origin to the Coker legacy, including Battle Park, the UNC Herbarium, the Coker Pinetum, and The Rocks at the Coker/Burns estate. -
Commission on Smart Growth, Growth Management and Development: Findings and Recommendations
Commission on Smart Growth, Growth Management and Development: Findings and Recommendations Fall 2001 Co-Chairs SENATOR HOWARD N. LEE REPRESENTATIVE JOE HACKNEY 16 TH DISTRICT 24 TH DISTRICT Ex-Officio Members LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DENNIS WICKER SECRETARY BILL HOLMAN Department of Environment & Natural Resources Secretary Richard Carlisle Secretary David McCoy Department of Commerce Department of Transportation Members James A. Abbott Dr. David Godschalk Dr. John O’Neil Mortgage Bankers Association American Planners Association, American Lung Association North Carolina Chapter Mayor Lucy Allen Senator Beverly Eaves Perdue North Carolina League of Municipalities Pricey Taylor Harrison 3rd District Environmental Advocate Randy Billings Julian H. Philpott, Jr. Regional Organization Senator Fletcher Hartsell North Carolina Farm Bureau 22nd District Vicki Bowman Representative Drew Saunders Environmental Advocate Charles Hayes 54th District Regional Organization Fred Bryant Ed Scott At-large Sam Hunter North Carolina Citizens for Business At-large and Industry Mike Carpenter North Carolina Home Builders Association Betty Huskins Roger Sheats North Carolina Travel and Tourism North Carolina Rural Center Brad Davis American Society of Landscape Architects, Commissioner Barry Jacobs Becky Smothers North Carolina Chapter North Carolina Association of North Carolina League of Municipalities County Commissioners Jeffrey T. Davis Allen St. Clair American Institute of Architects, Todd Mansfield North Carolina Association of Realtors North Carolina Chapter Developer John Tallmadge Representative Andy Dedmon Mayor John Marshall Environmental Advocate 48th District Regional Organization Dr. Wes Wallace Commissioner Mary Ann Enloe Mayor Pat McCrory Medical Advocate North Carolina Association of North Carolina League of Municipalities County Commissioners Senator Allen Wellons Representative Marian McLawhorn 11th District Commissioner J. Owen Etheridge 9th District North Carolina Association of Commissioner Darrel Williams County Commissioners Mayor Fred H. -
Real People – Real Stories
Real People – Real Stories Afton, NC (Warren County) Published: September 2006 © 2006 – Exchange Project at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Published September 2006 Permission is hereby granted for reproduction of this material, in whole or in part, for educational or scientific purposes except those involving commercial sale, provided that (a) full citation of the source is given, and (b) notification is given in writing to: The Exchange Project Department of Health Behavior and Health Education The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Campus Box # 7506 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7506 Fax: (919) 966-7955 Email: [email protected] http://www.ExchangeProject.unc.edu 1 Significance of Case After the illegal disposal of PCBs1 along North Carolina highways in 1978, state officials selected the predominately Black community of Afton for a landfill despite the site’s incompatibility with EPA guidelines. Community residents fought the initial placement of the landfill, often placing themselves in harm’s way by physically blocking trucks. Over twenty years after the landfill was constructed, persistent activism by community residents caused the state to complete on-site decontamination of the PCB-contaminated soil. Warren County is widely recognized as the birthplace of the environmental justice movement. Community History State officials, including Governor Jim Hunt, selected Warren County as the disposal site for PCB-contaminated soil in June 1979. According to the 1980 U.S. Census, the population of Warren County was estimated to be 16,232 and 60% Black (the state-wide percentage is 22%) (General Accounting Office, 1983). State officials denied that the racial makeup of Warren County influenced the decision to place the landfill in Afton. -
The North Carolina Environmental Education Plan: April 1995
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 399 129 SE 056 774 AUTHOR DuBay, Dennis, Ed. TITLE The North Carolina Environmental Education Plan: April 1995. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh. PUB DATE Apr 95 NOTE 57p. AVAILABLE FROMNorth Carolina Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Office of Environmental Education, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611-7687. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MFOI/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; Curriculum Design; *Educational Objectives; *Educational Planning; Educational Resources; Elementary Secondary Education; *Environmental Education; Evaluation; Higher Education; Partnerships in Education; Professional Development; *State Programs; Teacher Education IDENTIFIERS North Carolina ABSTRACT The North Carolina Environmental Education Plan evolved from the ideas and suggestions of hundreds of peopleacross North Carolina with over 1,300 individuals, businesses, organizations, and government agencies participating in theprocess. The first section of this document, Principles and Concepts of Environmental Education, outlines the principles and definition of environmental education, states the overall goals, and sets the stage for the presentation of the statewide plan'z objectives and implementation strategies. The second section, Objectives of Environmental Education, includes the following topics: in-service professional development, pre-service teacher education, higher education, clearinghouse, curriculum correlation, model -
Reimagining Community, Economics and the Region in Central North Carolina
“IN EACH OTHER WE TRUST”: REIMAGINING COMMUNITY, ECONOMICS AND THE REGION IN CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA Jonathan David Lepofsky A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Geography. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Dr. John Pickles Dr. Altha Cravey Dr. Lawrence Grossberg Dr. James Leloudis Dr. Wendy Wolford ABSTRACT In Each Other We Trust: Reimagining Community, Economics, and the Region in Central North Carolina (Under the direction of Dr. John Pickles) This dissertation examines the creation and circulation of a complementary currency, the PLENTY, within four contiguous counties in central North Carolina. Using a participatory research action model, this dissertation argues that the production of community through the PLENTY’s monetary space and alternative economic function creates an opportunity for residents within this region to rearticulate their relationship to people and places within and outside of the region. This alternative regional form is different than the dominant conception of the region as “the Triangle,” which is based around the global connections that meet up in Research Triangle Park and which have concretized over the past 50 years. The dissertation stresses the ambivalence with which this alternative regional form is realized either in idea or in practice due to the discursive limits PLENTY users put on the geography of community. While the PLENTY provides the possibility to practice a spatial ethics in which one’s sense of responsivess and care follow the complex lines of connection fostered by a diversely global sense of place, this potential remains latent when conventional relations between community, economics and place are not deconstructed.