Statement of Community Involvement

Crewe Green Link Road South (CGLRS) – Unlocking Economic Growth May & June 2011 - October 2012

Compiled by Jeanette Bate, Communications Officer – Economic Development, Cheshire East Council, Tel:- 01270 375109 1

REPORT CONTENTS

Page 3 Forward

Page 4 Introduction

Page 4 All Change for Crewe Project

Page 6 Crewe Green Link Road South – Unlocking Economic Growth

Page 8 Pre-Planning Consultation – Crewe Green Link Road South & Results

Page 14 Feedback & Comments

Page 17 Parish Council Response – Weston

Page 18 South Cheshire Chamber of Commerce & Industry Response

Page 19 Other Responses

Page 19 Postcode Areas & Level of Support

Page 19 Relevant Feedback from other Consultations

Page 22 Conclusion

Page 23 Appendix A – Full Comments and Relevant Codes

Page 47 Appendix A – Email Responses

Page 55 Addendum to Statement of Community Consultation – October 2012

FORWARD

Planning permission (ref: 11/1982N) for Crewe Green Link Road South (CGLRS) was approved on 12th October 2011 and was subject to a number of planning conditions. Subsequently it was identified that certain additional elements for the scheme needed to be included and that the inclusion of these and some elements covered by the previous planning conditions would best be resolved in an updated planning application for the whole scheme. The alignment and scale of the road are substantially the same; the additional elements will include (but not limited to): an alternative railway underbridge option; new cycle / pedestrian access from A500 / Mill Lane; flood compensation area; ecological habitat mitigation area; soil storage areas; and site compounds.

The pre-application consultation exercise undertaken as part of the previous application, and covered by this main body of this document, was still considered valid. It was therefore concluded that it would be appropriate to undertake only a limited consultation / public information exercise as part of this revised application. The details of this exercise are included as an Addendum at the end of this document.

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose and scope of this report

Good consultation lies at the heart of what Cheshire East Council does in being able to deliver the high quality services that people want and expect.

Effective community consultation enables the council to better understand its clients and customers, encourages the more efficient use of public resources and enables evidence-based decision making.

Over time, consultation helps to measure the performance of the council in delivering quality public services and helping to improve the quality of life for our residents.

This report summarises the pre-application consultation that has taken place prior to the submission of a planning application for Cheshire East Council's Crewe Green Link Road Scheme (CGLRS).

This report sets out how the local community, businesses, elected representatives and staff were consulted about the scheme and highlights the feedback that was given.

The main focus of the consultation programme was an online questionnaire hosted on Cheshire East Council's website – www.cheshireeast.gov.uk; three drop in events; letters distributed to approximately 600 households and businesses in the area and email briefing to elected members.

It also includes a range of relevant consultation responses from relevant projects including the Local Transport Plan 3 (LTP3) and ‘All Change for Crewe' (ACFC) consultations.

This Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) does not cover the specialist consultation which will be undertaken as part of the usual publication and notification processes.

This SCI has been prepared by the Communications Officer – Economic Development at Cheshire East Council.

2 'ALL CHANGE FOR CREWE' PROJECT

2.1 Introduction

‘All Change for Crewe’ sets out ambitious plans for growth with the aim for Crewe to become a nationally significant economic centre by 2030 with a total population in excess of 100,000, a large highly skilled working age population, and with employment indicators that meet or exceed national levels.

The Crewe Green Link Road South (CGLRS) scheme is one of several priority projects to be delivered through ‘All Change for Crewe’ and is a crucial component in these transformational plans for future economic and housing growth.

CGLRS will unlock the strategic potential of two major employment sites at Basford and it will facilitate delivery of additional GVA in the region of £250 million per annum, through the creation of up to 12,500 jobs in high value employment over the next 20 years.

2.2 The ‘All Change for Crewe’ Strategy

'All Change for Crewe’ is the route map for charting the town’s development over the next two decades. The strategy intends that by 2030 Crewe will be:-

• A nationally significant economic centre with a total population in excess of 100,000 people (currently it has about 83,000). • One of the leading centres for advanced engineering and manufacturing centres in England. • Recognised as a sought after place in the South Cheshire Belt for people to live, work, put down roots, and develop their talents.

‘All Change for Crewe’ has five components, as set out below:-

These, and their component focus areas, are expanded in the table below:-

Strategy Key focus areas element Crewe’s Improve attainment levels in low-performing schools, and increase levels of skills/qualifications knowledge Align Further/Higher Education provision with the needs of knowledge-based and growth-orientated economy sectors in the local economy people and Support existing major employers in developing their in-house skills, and more generally help to businesses nurture new and innovative businesses. Crewe’s Develop the railway station as a high-quality and high-performing gateway into, and out of, the town. connectivity Introduce measures to reduce congestion on the strategic road network, to enable internal and linkages movement Establish stronger linkages to neighbouring city-regions and the economic opportunities they offer Ensure Crewe has a competitive Next Generation Broadband infrastructure. Crewe’s Develop a high-quality offer in the town centre, and ensure that local businesses’ needs for physical accommodation are met development Realise the successful development of the Strategic Regional Site at Basford opportunities Enable the co-ordinated release of development land for housing, to assist the town’s population growth. Crewe’s Tackle the physical challenges in the deprived areas abutting the town centre, and ensure more liveability, generally all communities are served by quality public transport links local Improve the opportunities for Crewe’s children and young people through a specific focus on transport and improving schools aspiration Address the challenge of Young People not in Education, Employment or Training (NEET).

Crewe’s Ensure inspirational and ambitious civic leadership across the public, private and image, voluntary/community sectors. perception Devote greater attention and energy to acquiring, developing and retaining premium leadership as a and priority for the area. leadership Develop a dedicated and energised marketing/inward investment campaign to transform out-dated perceptions of Crewe and its capabilities.

3 CREWE GREEN LINK ROAD SOUTH (CGLRS) – UNLOCKING ECONOMIC GROWTH

3.1 Introduction

Crewe Green Link Road South (CGLRS) is a crucial component in transformational regeneration plans for Crewe, delivering additional GVA in the region of £250 million per annum through the creation of up to 12,500 jobs in high value employment over the next 20 years.

Crewe Green Link Road South will unlock the strategic potential of two major employment sites at Basford, which are the key to realising these aspirational plans. This high quality boulevard will provide direct access to transformational employment generating opportunities through the creation of a high quality science- oriented business and innovation park, and stimulate significant levels of investment and economic growth for Crewe and the wider sub region.

Crewe Green Link Road South is the catalyst that will facilitate significant economic benefits, and it will do this through early public investment of around £20 million.

As well as representing excellent value for money, the scheme is ready for delivery now. Driven by a strong private sector-led partnership, and supported by a wide range of public and private sector partners, the scheme's resulting transformational economic benefits cannot be lost and the vision or a growth location that is an inspirational gateway to the North must be realised.

Cheshire East Council recognises that congestion is a major issue in Crewe due to the historic railway lanes. This makes travelling through Crewe a difficult and time consuming process.

3.2 Why is the Scheme Needed?

The first phase of the Crewe Green Link Road (CGLR) was completed in 2004 and has played an important role in facilitating employment growth. The Crewe Green Link Road South will provide direct links to Basford East, as well as improving journey times to the town centre and improvement access to other development sites in the south east of Crewe. It will also have major environmental benefits for the local community, improving air quality and reducing exposure to traffic noise.

The delivery of Crewe Green Link Road South will unlock the strategic potential of Basford and facilitate the delivery of Crewe’s vision for economic growth by 2030, which will see Basford East firmly established as one of the UK’s largest science- focused business parks. The Crewe Green Link Road South will provide an alternative bypass to the south east of Crewe making north-south movements easier and reducing town centre traffic congestion.

Improvements to the currently congested A534 Nantwich Road corridor (which is currently designated as an Air Quality Management Zone) will be particularly notable, improving travel times and reliability, improving road safety and reducing the impact of traffic on the local environment and the local community, improving air quality and reducing exposure to traffic noise and vibration.

3.3 Department for Transport Development Pool

Following successful lobbing with the Department for Transport (DfT), the scheme has been retained within the DfT Development Pool. The scheme was short-listed following a successful Expression of Interest submission in December 2010.

Development work on the scheme has continued and we are now in a position to submit a planning application. This will add weight to our final bid for Government funding which must be made in September 2011.

4 PRE-PLANNING CONSULTATION – CREWE GREEN LINK ROAD SOUTH (CGLRS)

4.1 Introduction

To give residents, businesses and politicians the opportunity to find out more about the scheme, ask any questions or raise any concerns they had, Cheshire East Council undertook a period of ‘pre-planning application’ consultation which ran from Monday 9th May and ended mid June 2011.

To take part in the consultation, interested parties were given the opportunity to complete an online questionnaire; send in comments by email or attend one of three drop in events held in the area.

A total of 355 respondents answered the questionnaire; 72 respondents gave further comments and feedback; individual emails were received from residents and businesses including a written response from Basford and Weston Parish Council and East Cheshire Chamber of Commerce & Industry. Feedback received at the drop in events was also very positive.

Throughout this report, the comments made have been clustered together to show common themes and we have responded to the queries raised as shown on pages 20 – 25. The full comments received are shown in Appendix A.

The questionnaire included five questions in total and respondents were asked to show their level of support for the scheme and make any additional comments they would like to make.

The consultation exercise included the following:- • An online questionnaire with further background information available including a Q & A, plans and further information on our website – www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/allchangeforcrewe • Two releases to the media in Crewe throughout the consultation period to raise awareness/generate interest. • A face to face briefing to Weston & Basford Parish Council on 12th May 2011. • Two public drop in events on 12th May 2011 and one public drop in event on 19th May 2011. • A letter to interested parties within the Weston area. • An email briefing to local members within Crewe and parish councils and; • Staff from Cheshire East Council were also given the opportunity to have their say.

Drop in events were held:-

On Thursday 12th May 2011 - from 2.00pm–4.00pm at Wychwood Village Hall & from 4.30pm–6.30pm at Weston Church Hall & On Thursday 19th May 2011 - from 3.00pm–7.00pm at the Lyceum Square Cafe, Crewe.

The Media Relations Team issued two media releases regarding the consultation exercise resulting in coverage as follows:- 8

A pre-recorded radio interview with Councillor Jamie Macrae on BBC Radio Stoke; An article in the South Cheshire Advertiser on 19th May 2011 and; An article in the Crewe Chronicle on 18th May 2011.

4.2 The Results

To summarise, the key results identified from the pre-planning application consultation programme for Crewe Green Link Road South (CGLRS) were as follows:-

In response to the question, Crewe Green Link Road will provide the missing link in delivering a bypass for Crewe from the A534 Haslington Bypass to the Nantwich Bypass, do you support the need to provide an alternative route for cross Crewe traffic?, the results were as follows:-

Level of support for the need to provide an alternative route for cross Crewe traffic

The above results show that 54.4% (168 people) said no, 43.2% (133 people) who said yes and 2.3% (7 people) said not sure.

In response to the question, how strongly do you agree or disagree that removing traffic from town centre routes will improve the environment for pedestrians and cyclists and improve the reliability of public transport?, the results were as follows:-

Level of support for removing traffic from town centre routes to improve the environment for pedestrians and cyclists and improve the reliability of public transport

The above results show that 49.2% (126 people) said strongly agree or agree; 35.9% (92 people) said disagree or strongly disagree and 14.8% (38 people) said neither agree nor disagree.

In response to the question, are you in support of the pedestrian and cycle links that will be provided along the route of the Crewe Green Link Road, the results were as follows:-

Level of support for pedestrian and cycle links provided along the route of the Crewe Green Link Road

The above results show that 83.0% (215 people) said yes, 7.3% (19 people) said no and 9.7% (25 people) said not sure.

In response to the question, how strongly do you agree or disagree that Crewe Green Link Road will support the economy of the Crewe area by improving access for both existing and new businesses, the results were as follows:-

Level of support for Crewe Green Link Road South supporting the economy of the Crewe area by improving access for both existing and new businesses.

Level of support for CGLRS supporting the economy for new and existing businesses

Level of support that Crewe Green Link Road will support the economy of the Crewe area by improving access for both existing and new businesses

The above results show that 62.4% (206 people) said strongly disagree or disagree; 31.9% (105 people) said strongly agree or agree and 5.5% (18 people) said neither agree nor disagree.

In response to the question, do you agree or disagree in principle with the proposals for the Crewe Green Link Road, the results were as follows:-

Level of support for the proposals for the Crewe Green Link Road South

The above results show that 61.8% (204 people) said strongly disagree or disagree; 36.1% (119 people) said strongly agree or agree and 2.1% (7 people) said neither agree nor disagree.

5.3 Feedback & Comments

72 respondents submitted additional comments in relation to the questions which have been included within this report. The full comments are included in Appendix A but to show common themes, we have categorised the comments as follows:-

Table 1 – Comments - Roads

SUBJECT FREQUENCY COMMENT RESPONSE REFERENCE

Support for the X 16 R1, R2, R4, CGLRS Scheme R11, R20, R22, R26, R35, R36, R39, R45, R53, R58, R69, R75 & R80

Traffic – general X 3 R21, R31 & R37

Traffic – local roads X 8 R5, R6, R7, R34, R38, R47, R54 & R60

A500 Congestion X 21 R10, R23, R28, Plans have been approved to R29, R41, R43, undertake significant capacity R44, R46, R48, improvements to the A500 at R49, R50, R54, M6 J16 as part of the planning R56, R57, R59, approval for the Basford West R60, R67, R70, development site. A further R71, R72 & enhancement is being assessed R77 as part of work on the emerging Local Development Framework. This work will deliver an infrastructure plan to achieve the ‘All Change for Crewe’ project, a key component of which is ensuring better links to the M6 corridor.

Nantwich Road X 14 R8, R9, R12, The completion of the Crewe Congestion R16, R33, R40, Green Link Road will provide R51, R52, R61, some local and strategic traffic R64, R67, R68, movements an alternative route

R79 & R80 to roads in Crewe, in particular the Nantwich Road. This will help ease the traffic congestion in the short term.

Crewe Green X 6 R17, R19, R55, Enhancements to these Roundabout /Crewe R60, R62 & junctions are being assessed as Arms Hotel R81. part of work on the emerging Roundabout Local Development Framework. This work will include an infrastructure plan to deliver the growth targets set out in the ‘All Change for Crewe’ project, a key component of which is ensuring better road links on the key corridors in Crewe, including these two junctions. Further, plans to redevelop Crewe Station aim to improve the traffic management arrangements around the station such that the ‘knock on’ affects on the Crewe Arms junction are mostly removed.

Quality & Design X 1 R15

Economy, town X 2 R13 & R63 centre & greater Crewe

Crewe Gates X 1 R24 Scheme

Junction 16, M6 X 9 R27, R30, R42, Plans have been approved by R46, R49, R57, the Highways Agency to R65, R66 & undertake significant capacity R72 improvements to M6 J16 as part of the planning approval for the Basford West development site. The Highways Agency are being consulted on the assessment work for the emerging Local Development Framework. This work will 15

deliver an infrastructure plan to achieve the ‘All Change for Crewe’ project, a key component of which is ensuring better links to the M6 corridor.

X 2 R32 & R78

General X 1 R74

Table 2 – Comments - Basford

SUBJECT FREQUENCY COMMENT RESPONSE REFERENCE

Nature & type of X 3 B5, B6, B10 To support ‘All Change for development on Crewe’, the current planning Basford East policy affecting the site is under review as part of work on the emerging Local Development Framework. Any proposed land use changes will be consulted upon in due course.

Traffic generated by X 4 B1, B8, B11 & This will be considered when Basford East B12 producing the Infrastructure Plan for Crewe.

Environment X 1 B4

Investment from X 2 B4 & B13 The Basford East developers Basford East will be expected to invest a fair Developers contribution towards the overall delivery of the Infrastructure Plan.

Warehousing at X 5 B2, B3, B6, B8 To support ‘All Change for Basford East & B9 Crewe’, the current planning policy affecting the site is under review as part of work on the emerging Local Development Framework. Any proposed land use changes will be consulted upon in due course.

Table 3 – Comments – Cycling/Pedestrian Access

SUBJECT FREQUENCY COMMENT RESPONSE REFERENCE

Cycle X 9 C1, C2, C3, C4, Routes/Access C5, C6, C10, C11 & C12

Safety for Cyclists X 4 C1, C3, C7 & C10

Table 4 – Comments – General

SUBJECT FREQUENCY COMMENT RESPONSE REFERENCE

Economy/ X 1 G2 Businesses

Consultation X 9 G4, G5, G6, Process/ G7, G11, G12, Information G13, G17 & provided G19

Bus Services X 2 G8 & G16

Railway X 2 G3 & G9

Environment/Green X 3 G1, G10 & G18 Commuting

5.3 Parish Council Response The following response was received from Weston & Basford Parish Council.

Comments of Weston & Basford Parish Council Crewe Green Link Road Pre-planning application consultation

Weston & Basford Parish Council supports the principle of the proposed Crewe Green Link Road, subject to being totally reassured on the following points which relate to the wider development package for the Basford East Strategic Employment area of which this proposal forms the first part:

° * Future Land Use of Basford East: The whole of this site lies within the Parish and represents the largest and most important development proposal to affect our community for a generation. The Parish Council seeks to ensure that the type of development results in a high quality, prestigious gateway scheme not only for Crewe but the whole of the North West – we are conscious of the fact that this site forms a shop window for our area served directly from Junction 16 on the M6. ° We will strongly resist large scale warehouse development and wish to see a high tech, regional scenario which will retain the University talent that we have with the MMU in addition to bringing new skills and jobs into the area. We want the development to be labour intensive and not land extensive. ° * Improvements to Junction 16 on the M6 along with the dualling of the A500 from the top of Weston Road through to Junction 16: The whole of this stretch of road is already gridlocked on a daily basis at peak times. All of this severely restricts movement into and out of our parish and causes congestion within our indigenous road system. If this problem is not addressed before additional development takes place, life will become intolerable for our residents. ° * Traffic Management measures to protect our indigenous road network from additional and speeding traffic (including heavy vehicles) resulting both from the Crewe Green Link Road and the Basford East Development: We already suffer from a major rat running problem along our country lanes to and from Junction 16 on the M6 with traffic trying to circumnavigate the already congested primary road network. We have an active Speedwatch Group, are campaigning for 7.5 tonne weight restrictions along with effective traffic attenuation measures along Main Road Weston. We need to be convinced that your scheme incorporates such measures to protect our community. Weston & Basford does not form part of Crewe per say. It consists of a group of rural communities, the character of which must be maintained. ° Assurances on meaningful Parish Council consultation relating to the whole of the development package: As part of the Local Development Framework consultation we asked for our Parish Council to be consulted during the process, not after decisions had been made. We are not here to block proposals but to offer constructive comments – after all we are the people on the ground and we live here!

*We have just produced a Parish Plan for Weston & Basford. The first three bullet points highlighted form a part of the key actions within that Parish Plan. The number 1 issue raised by residents during our survey, which received a 41% response, related to traffic and highway issues.

Weston & Basford Parish Council, May 2011

5.4 South Cheshire Chamber of Commerce & Industry Response The following response was received from South Cheshire Chamber of Commerce & Industry.

Q1 – Yes Q2 – Strongly agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Strongly agree Q5 – Strongly agree

Other Emails/Responses Received

In addition to open comments received from the questionnaire, we also received 14 responses from individuals and businesses as shown in Appendix A.

5.5 Postcode Areas & Level of Support

Despite requesting details of respondent's postcodes, insufficient numbers responded in order for us to reliably determine an area based response.

Only 141 respondents supplied the first three digits of their postcode.

From the drop in events and feedback received, as would be expected, a heavier negative response was received locally (Weston) than in the wider Crewe area.

6 Relevant feedback from other Consultations

Within this section of the report, we have set out, the results from other relevant consultations.

LTP Consultation Level of Support

In preparation for Cheshire East Council’s Local Transport Plan 3, a public consultation was undertaken.

The Crewe Green Link Road Scheme (CGLRS) was highlighted within the Business Growth chapter in LTP3 as an individual case study. The study detailed how vital the project is to unlock the full potential of the Basford East strategic development site.

The LTP public consultation indicated individuals’ agreement (59%) of 221 respondents with the High Level Priorities selected which included ‘create conditions for Business Growth; of which CGLRS is a fundamental component. A further (49%) of 171 respondents were in full agreement with the proposed priorities within the Business Growth chapter too, showing further support for the Crewe Green Link Road South Scheme (CGLRS).

All Change for Crewe Public Consultation

Last November, we consulted residents and interested parties in Crewe to give them the opportunity to have their say over the Council’s ambitious plans to regenerate Crewe over the next two decades.

(57%) of 221 respondents said that better connections to the motorway were a high priority for them by scoring it between 7 and 10 in terms of importance.

In terms of improvements to the town centre, better traffic management and improved cycle access were high on the agenda from the comments received.

Transport Baseline Data Report 2010

As highlighted in the Transport Baseline Data Report in 2010, we asked people what should be done to shape Cheshire East’s future.

Respondents said they were concerned about traffic congestion; the poor state of some roads and the cycle paths.

LTP Workshop – 28th June 2010

On 28th June 2010, we held a workshop with members and officers to discuss challenges and initiatives.

In terms of creating conditions for business growth, respondents highlighted the following priorities:-

Reduce the level of delay on our transport networks by targeting congestion ‘hotspots’. Tackling congestion by increasing road capacity with road widening schemes and bypasses. Maintain and improve the condition of our highways. Improve road safety for young adults Improve facilities for cycling so that it is attractive to cycle for shorter journeys.

LAP Consultation

In 2010, we held a public consultation with members of the Cheshire East Local Area Partnerships (LAPs) to look at challenges in a number of areas including creating conditions for business growth and unlocking the potential of our towns. 20% of members were from Crewe and the following priorities were highlighted:-

Ensure that there are good transport links to employment sites (68%/39). Improve the conditions of our highways (53%/30). Reduce the level of delay on our transport network by targeting congestion hotspots (40%/23). Improve links into towns to provide access to important services from nearby villages and rural areas (67%/38). Improve road safety for young people (18%/10). Improve facilities for walking and cycling (79%/46).

National Highways & Transport Public Satisfaction Survey 2010

The results of the survey show that only 39.19 out of 100 in Cheshire East were satisfied with traffic levels and congestion and; 55.15 out of 100 in Cheshire East were satisfied with road safety locally and; 47.48 out of 100 in Cheshire East were satisfied with cycle routes and facilities.

Communities of Cheshire Survey 2008

The Communities of Cheshire Survey 2008 (known nationally as the Places Survey) Provides information on people’s perceptions of their local area and the local services they receive. The survey collects information on 18 national indicators for local government.

Key results were as follows:-

44.1% of respondents thought that the level of traffic congestion most needed improving. 33.7% of respondents in the North West overall thought that the level of traffic congestion most needed improving. 71% of respondents from Cheshire East felt that road congestion in their local town had got worse of the past five years. Higher proportions in 2008, than in 2006, felt that congestion was a problem most of the time or frequently in town centres and on local roads. 40% believed that compared to five years ago, Cheshire roads were less safe. Of these, a fifth stated this was due to more traffic.

NHT Survey 2009

In 2009, over half of English Highway Authorities (76 in total) took part in a public satisfaction survey organised by the National Highways & Transport Network (NHT) and was carried out by IPSOS Mori. The purpose of the survey was to collect public perspectives and satisfaction levels with highways and transportation services in local authority areas.

In Cheshire East, the survey was distributed by post to 4,500 randomly selected households with a 21.4% return rate.

In Cheshire East, the key results were as follows:-

72.15 rated it as important but only 30.74 were satisfied – a - 41.41 gap. 69.9 rated safer roads as important but only 54.58 were satisfied – a - 15.32 gap. 53.63 rated cycle routes and facilities as important but only 48.76 were satisfied – a - 4.87 gap.

Parish Plans

A review of Cheshire East parish plans was also undertaken, taking note of the parish’s priorities, the issue of road safety and speed was by far the most mentioned in the plans and a high priority.

The topic of traffic volume and HGV flows was also mentioned in 17 out of 27 of the plans, each time as a high priority.

7 CONCLUSION

From the outset, the purpose of this consultation has been to engage with local Residents, businesses and politicians in a pro-active, systematic and transparent manner. Full contact details were provided if residents needed further information and had specific concerns. Staff from Cheshire East Council were also available at a series of drop in events held in the area. This facilitated a meaningful dialogue with local interested parties

Appendix A Full Comments & Relevant Codes

Full Comments - Road

Code Comment Response

R1 Excellent scheme and is needed as soon as possible for the community of Crewe. R2 Crewe needs this development and investment. R3 Evidence from previous road-building schemes tells us that they generate additional traffic - which is the LAST thing Crewe needs. The pressure on Weston Road / Nantwich Road etc will be minimised for, ooh, five minutes before the additional volumes put the problem back to where it was before the new road was built. R4 Positive progress towards a better Crewe - new Railway station, new link road. Private sector will do the rest. R5 The economic centre of Crewe is to the east and well served by roads at present. Such a road would only benefit traffic from Nantwich and Middlewich. R6 Road congestion is not bad compared with other towns - Middlewich has the worst congestion in the borough - it takes 30 minutes to get 1 mile during rush hour. R7 That as part of the works the highway agency "Dual the section from Mearmore Moss to the M6 junction” if not the bottle neck will get worse.

R8 This road will provide the alternative route for Nantwich Rd traffic going in a westerly or Northerly route, so should give relief to Crewe, Wistaston & Willaston.

R9 This road will provide the alternative route for Nantwich Rd traffic going in a westerly or Northerly route, so should give relief to Crewe, Wistaston & Willaston. R10 Until the existing link road (A500) to Junction16 of the M6 motorway is improved, any talk of a new "link" road is pointless and its construction will only make the A500 traffic congestion much worse. R11 Should have been done when other roads improved. R12 The prime purpose must be to carry traffic emanating from and to the M6 via Haslington By Pass heading to/from Holyhead and North Wales it may do little to speed up traffic on Nantwich Road due to the ill- conceived speed tables coupled with an enormity of non interlinked Traffic Signals on a 20mph stretch.

R13 It will do nothing to help reduce traffic in the Town Centre as suggested which is heading for grid lock when the new Tesco Extra opens next February or for the Queues of Traffic trying to gain access to the Retail Park. R14 The likelihood here is that you will build a road which adds nothing except road capacity. It would be possible to make a really high quality route for cycling and walking as well as for vehicles. A route that would allow views of the surrounding area and give some context to the place. As it stands it is just another road, probably hidden by trees and embankments, apologising for its very existence.

R15 This needs much more thought and to be of much better quality design if it is to benefit Crewe. R16 Nantwich Road is a nightmare and traffic needs to be taken away from it. R17 If the link proceeds to build, there is an urgent need to improve the Crewe Green roundabout and its signals. The design was flawed when built, due, I suspect, by Cheshire CC engineers not correctly assessing the traffic flows, and not taking local views into account. Redesign for the lanes and signals on the Sydney Road and Hungerford Road approach and exits is essential. There needs to be a separate lane for the above road traffic exit onto the Haslington Bypass and thus free up the other two lanes for traffic to Haslington, and the Link Road. Also a left filter onto Hungerford Road.

R19 Even if the Link Road is built, there will still be a need for redesign at the Crewe Arms Hotel roundabout, possible removing some or all of the signals. The current arrangements are deeply flawed and will never, ever, work properly. R20 Great need for this road to be sorted ASAP. R21 THE EXTENSION OF THE BY PASS WILL TAKE TRAFFIC AWAY FROM SLAUGHTER HILL AND OLD PARK ROAD, NEITHER OF WHICH WERE DESIGNED TO COPE WITH THE VOLUME AND SIZE OF VEHICLES THAT USE THESE ROADS ON A DAILY BASIS. R22 Long overdue.

R23 I am concerned about the effect on the A500 up to the M6. What plans are there in place for dualing this?

R24 Crewe Green Link road should take preference over Crewe Gates Scheme. R26 The Crewe green link road is vital for the future of Crewe. R27 The single carriageway to J16 is the real problem and this scheme will make that WORSE. R28 Crewe is a Victorian town with Victorian access routes, significantly having to cross the railways at several points in and around the town. Until the question of access to the town itself is addressed, the construction of the CGLR to relieve town traffic is myth of gross proportions. Indeed, the A500 was pushed as the all-singing-all-dancing answer to traffic on Nantwich Road.

The contrary evidence is there to see: fuel-strapped employers (especially HGVs) are not going to add 11 miles to their journeys to use the A500 rather than the far shorter A534 (Nantwich Road). As it is, there are convoys of HGVs using the road throughout the night. R29 It was never intended as a "bypass" and was only to provide a north and south access to the major routes beyond: A534 and A500. R30 Whilst I agree with the need for the road to open up the land at Basford, I feel that there must be a major widening of the Barthomley link to the M6 at Jnc 16. Without it this section of road will be even more congested by the projected increase in traffic as a result of the Basford development. R31 I believe that this will be crucial to developing Crewe and opening up new business opportunities as well as easing traffic congestion within the town. R32 I am concerned that the road will add noise pollution and remove some of the wildlife habitats en-route. 26

R33 University way. Traffic still continues to prefer the use of Nantwich road. R34 There is the potential that the new road will not alleviate the traffic in the same way as I would like to see a radical review of all traffic routes in Crewe town centre, including the potential for the introduction of a one- way system. R35 I hope it happens!!!

R36 A much needed project, I hope it is successful. Having built all bar the last section of the Crewe by-pass it seems logical to finish it. However, in general we know that building more road capacity encourages more traffic. Thus it is really time to start thinking about how to depress the amount of traffic on the roads. R37 I noticed the comments in support of the scheme "... improving travel times and reliability, improving road safety and reducing the impact of traffic on the local environment and the local community..." Major road projects never achieve this in the medium to long term s can be seen by the extensive road building around Nantwich and Crewe. Congestion has not been reduced as expected and the benefits to road safety will be outweighed by more driving. R38 My main hope is that any decisions taken will have the effect of reducing the volume of traffic traversing Whites Lane, Weston - which is a 'rat-run', and is an accident waiting to happen. R39 I believe that this will be crucial to developing Crewe and opening up new business opportunities as well as easing traffic congestion within the town.

R40 There is the potential that the new road will not alleviate the traffic in the same way as University way. Traffic still continues to prefer the use of Nantwich road. R41 There will be more traffic round the local villages. R42 Has consideration been given to upgrading the single carriageway stretch up to J16? I agree with the need for the road to take traffic away from Nantwich Road (A534). Can you also make sure that all the H G V'S use it instead or Sydney road, Remer Street, and the Middlewich road. They all use it as a short cut to the motorway links. R43 Crewe needs to sort its internal road system out as well as the outer one, when large firms move into the area they attract smaller firms but the current town centre road system is grid locked and a laugh .If I had the chance to invest in a small business within the town centre the answer would be a resounding NO. Traffic management has been introduced onto many roads and roundabouts but when these fail traffic seems to move more freely. R44 Please look at the whole of the town when you are making decisions. R45 This scheme is long overdue, Crewe could be a great place to live and work if this scheme and many other schemes were carried out, it’s because there are critics of improving the area and certain Cheshire east councillors that have stopped Crewe and Nantwich moving with the times. This scheme should and must be started A.S.A.P. if we do not want the area to fall further into decline.

R46 This scheme is desperately needed along with a dual carriage way to the M6. Why wasn't it done in the first place, once you start a job finishes it. The sooner the better. Improving the A500 around the M6. You could end up with another road improvement scheme which is private

funding lead and awaits completion for years like the Basford West Scheme. Cheshire East has no control over the proposals in the end.

R47 It doesn't matter what routes you provide if cars can't get into the town centre. It is easier for me to get to Asda at Woolstanton than the one in Crewe Town Centre etc etc R48 Whilst the new road might open opportunities for development in the area marked Basford East, surely that would then bring even more traffic, my point being that every morning and evening the single carriageway section of the A500 is usually solid in one or both directions; more traffic (through new enterprises) will only add to that. The industrial units to be built adjacent to the A500 should be restricted in height, of a colour to blend into the landscape and have mature trees planted all to reduce the visual impact when passing by on the A500. R49 Hopefully this new road will help the push to dual the rest of the A500 link road to the M6 at Jn.16. R50 More importantly we need the single lane access to m6 improved on the a500. That should be done first to make it a dual carriageway to improve outflow. Otherwise the queue is just shifted not solved. Try being there around busy times!

R51 Looking at the plan I am not sure it is going to relieve the congestion on Nantwich road. Also can the designers of the roundabouts please keep them simple? The roundabouts by Crewe station and that one by the Haslington by-pass were clearly designed by someone who doesn't drive, and I see near misses on a daily basis. Please keep them easy and simple. R52 I agree that measures need to be taken to reduce congestion in the Nantwich Road area, but fail to see how this new road will accomplish this, I have studied the maps and as far as I can see this new road will just get the traffic to the congestion site more quickly. R53 I am not against the new road just don’t think it will help. R54 As a resident of Wistaston, if I need to drive to anywhere east of the station I nearly always use the lanes through Shavington, Basford and Weston because of congestion along Nantwich Road and at the Crewe Arms roundabout. I strongly suspect many other people do as well. If this road is built, I will use the A500 and this road instead, thereby reducing the traffic using the lanes. But for drivers to be encouraged to use the new road, once it opens I'd suggest Nantwich Road should be declassified from an A-road to either unclassified or a B-road. The road should also lead to the success of Basford East & West. If it isn't built, the Basford sites will be perceived as being isolated from Crewe, which could limit how much benefit Crewe gains from these developments.

R55 This scheme will only serve to increase the congestion at Crewe Green roundabout. This roundabout is badly designed with too many traffic lights which are badly phased, this is causing traffic to use Haslington as a rat run exiting the village via Slaughter Hill. Before this roundabout was changed & lights installed there were very little problems with congestion. The roundabout needs to be re-thought if your scheme goes ahead. I suggest your planners visit the area at rush hours in the morning & evening to witness the problem, which can only get worse. R56 Re less traffic in the town centre - why are Tesco being allowed to build a Tesco Extra in the town if there is less traffic wanted? The existing link road has done nothing to ease congestion in Crewe. R57 This scheme will be in vein if the single carriageway of the A500 up to Junction 16 of the M6 is not widened and an underpass constructed. R58 We need this road as soon as possible, traffic in Weston is a nightmare at certain times of the day. R59 You cannot get the lorries to use the A500 now many prefer to take the short cut along Nantwich Rd which is a lot shorter than going via the A500. R60 You already have half the link Road from Crewe Green to the Pub. All you have to do is widen part of Weston Road to the Roundabout by Crewe Hall. There's no need to build another bridge. Although the A500 leading to the M6 needs widening and quickly. However, none of this will improve the Town Centre nor relieve any traffic from the Town Centre. You would do better by improving the Town Centre urgently.

R61 The sooner it’s built the better it will relieve the traffic on Nantwich road and improve the air quality for people who live nearby. R62 The roundabout joining the Crewe green link road to Weston road will become a bottleneck at peak traffic times. This will back-up traffic even more (which already is a problem leaving Crewe along Weston road at 5pm weekdays). It will also result in more traffic backed-up on entry to Crewe from the Crewe hall direction at 9am weekdays for a similar reason. What plans are in place to alleviate this, I see nothing in the plans for this?

However, I do not think this scheme will have a significant impact on the through-traffic problems along Crewe Road - I would question your assumptions on this. R63 There is also a great risk that this becomes just a way to by-pass Crewe and further damage the economy of the town centre rather than bringing in more people. It will be a means for people to access the motorway and Sainsburys and the station and other strategic locations by private vehicle without ever having to know where the centre of Crewe is. R64 The paper outlining Pre-planning application consultation-Crewe Green Link Road South makes much of possible improvements to the Nantwich Road corridor-reducing traffic noise and vibration, also improving traffic times. This new link road will just move such problems from 1 road to another.

R65 It will also make the Weston Gate roundabout much busier with commercial vehicles joining it. The route from Newcastle to Crewe via Betley and from the M6 into Crewe passing Crewe Hall is already extremely busy at peak times of the day where the road from Weston joins the main road. More vehicles joining the Weston Gate roundabout will only make matters worse. Even 6 years ago when I was working it could take as long as 20 mins to get from Cemetery Rd to the roundabout by the station which is probably only 2 miles. R66 Money should probably be better spent elsewhere improving the A500 around the M6. You could end up with another road improvement scheme which is private funding lead and awaits completion for years like the Basford West Scheme. Cheshire East has no control over the proposals in the end. R67 It is most vital to have this link or Nantwich Road will always be congested. Why construct the A500 Bypass and not link Crewe? Let’s have it sooner not later.

R68 My main concern is the slow moving traffic on Nantwich Road, Crewe.

R69 The new link road can only be good for the town.

R70 Not mentioned in the documentation on the website is what changes in signage further afield might be made as part of the scheme. For example, in order to reduce the west-to-east traffic along the A534 Nantwich Road from the Wrexham, Whitchurch and Chester direction, would signage from the A51 bypass around Nantwich suggest using the A500 and the proposed link road to get to the railway station, business parks and industrial parks – perhaps “Crewe (East)” and leave the A534 signage for local destinations Wistaston, Willaston, perhaps “Crewe (West)”? R71 In order to reduce traffic (mistakenly) using Main Road in Weston, plus Newcastle Road through Hough and Shavington, will the old A500 signage (still left over since the dual- carriageway opened several years ago) on the Newcastle Road and its approaches (e.g. on the A531 near Wychwood Park) be removed and/or revised. R72 In order to reduce traffic on Old Park Road and part of Weston Road by Crewe Hall, would traffic approaching from the M6 J16 on the single- carriageway part of the A500 be directed to Crewe along the dual- carriageway section of the A500 to turn right onto the southern end of the CGLRS scheme and, vice-versa, to leave Crewe for the motorway using the CGLRS, then turn left along the dual-carriageway section of the A500? R73 Until the approaches and exits of the roundabout in the middle of the proposed link are needed, could the road markings painted so that traffic passes over it north-south without the need to give way, thus reducing unnecessary bunching of traffic for the time being?

R74 Further is the scheme to be designed by the council or will assistance be required, as was utilised on the recently completed Alderley Edge bypass. If so have these consultants been appointed. Further as part of the scheme are there any proposals to amend / review the timings of the signalised roundabout junction at the end of the Haslington Bypass / University Way that already has significant queuing problems? R75 This scheme is long overdue, Crewe could be a great place to live and work if this scheme and many other schemes were carried out, it’s because there are critics of improving the area and certain Cheshire east councillors that have stopped Crewe and Nantwich moving with the times. This scheme should and must be started A.S.A.P. if we do not want to see the area fall further into decline.

There are many other improvements that need to be made if Crewe and Nantwich are going to come into the 21st century which I could tell you if you were interested in the views of just 1 resident of Crewe. R76 We object to the construction of this road if the intention is to add traffic capacity to the highway network. The A-road network is already complete in this area along the A500 and the A5020. Congestion on these roads should be tackled by other means; experience demonstrates that building more capacity is not sustainable in the longer term.

R77 We would not object to the road however if there was a complementary proposal to remove the short section of the A5020 between its junction with the A500 and Weston Road from the strategic road network, and to downgrade Weston Road east of the Crewe Green link road at Crewe Hall to a minor road. The downgrading could only be achieved by physical measures and traffic restrictions, which should be funded as part of the major road scheme. This will be another very expensive section of road. R78 Any new road should be assessed knowing that transport has to play its part in carbon reduction. R79 We do not believe construction of the new road will lead to lasting improvements on the Nantwich Road/Crewe Road access, the A534, as so many journeys are very local. We suggest the way to influence traffic levels on this road is by much more concerted effort in promoting walking, cycling and improvements to local public transport. Whilst the Council's bid to the Local Sustainable Transport Fund is welcome, the Crewe component of this will be small scale compared with the resources and time which will have to be committed to the new road. R80 It is most vital to have this link or Nantwich Road will always be congested. Why construct the A500 Bypass and not link Crewe? Let’s have it sooner not later.

R81 Urgent attention is needed on Nantwich Road, Station Area. We are finding customers are avoiding this area because of gridlock.

Full Comments – Basford

Code Comment Response

B1 I think the problem will be more acute once offices start opening in the new Basford areas, contributing to further commuting traffic. B2 Warehousing today does not provide work for a lot of people - at the most one or two with robotic equipment. B3 The Crewe Green Link Road will encourage the development of monster-sized warehouses which will confirm Crewe's status as a nationally-important SINK TOWN providing nothing but unskilled jobs. If that is what you want - go ahead. B4 Please do not agree any land deals which would jeopardise any existing green gap areas. I can't see the investment being any use without investment from the new landowners/companies planning to use this industrial site. B5 Need to provide for business and institutional usage. B6 The questions are very slewed towards trying to make out that this is about the environment but really it is about opening up Basford West for development. If it is just for warehousing it will provide few jobs and they will be low paid and unskilled.

B8 The fact is that the CGLR was only ever sponsored as the means of providing routes on and off Basford East for warehouse traffic.

B9 The Basford East Basford West Action Group (BEBWAG) fought long and hard to have both Basford East and Basford West, if they had to be "developed" at all, used for more sustainable development: offices; science parks; educational environments; etc. The twenty-year- plus concept that warehouse developments would be large and sustainable employers has long-since been killed off by innovations in automation and robotics: massive warehouses can be controlled and run by very small teams of people. To promote the advantages of the Crewe Green Link Road as the means to provide potentially 12,500 jobs is irresponsible and extreme. Warehousing will not achieve anything even close to those numbers; office and science parks may do better, but only up to half the number quoted. However, Cheshire East, under pressure from big-money foreign developers, has already given way to a warehouse proposal on Basford West; this development is subject to a Section-106 agreement, whereby this building cannot be occupied until the local road infrastructure is in place: the Basford West spine road; the CGLR; AND, an east-bound only link to the M6 at Junction 16. When the CGLR was first proposed, American developer ProLogis were keen to put a warehouse on the site near to the Weston Road entrance. They had an unusually long (10 years) grant of outline planning permission which expired in March 2009. In the meantime, ProLogis built two warehouses on Weston Road: one on the site of the former Midland Rollmakers and one on the site of the former Dairy Crest depot.

The former was taken up by Tesco Express, but the latter remains empty after two years, victim of the recession, but possibly also victim of a change in perception and haulage practices. Suffice to say, any further move to develop on Basford East will require a new planning application from ProLogis, assuming that they have not been put off by being “bitten” by their failure to rent or sell their massive warehouse on Weston Road. B10 In promoting the construction of this road, the Council should be “up front” about it and admit that it is pursuing old policies to open up Basford East to would-be developers of all descriptions. Tacking on “the potential to create 12,500 jobs” is again wishful thinking and has been disproved over and over. B11 The main purpose of this road in my opinion is to serve the new Basford East and West developments bringing more traffic to the Weston area. This in turn usually means more housing development at some time in the future-another nail in the coffin for the small, quiet village of Weston. B12 If the Basford West development takes place, then there MUST also be a much improved carriageway from Shavington to Crewe. The current B Road cannot take any more traffic - that WILL come even with the proposed link road. B13 The funding for the new scheme should be borne by the proposed development that is to benefit most from the proposals, namely Basford East. Yes, the scheme will benefit the other businesses in the Crewe Green area but I don't think it will have a massive impact on the town centre traffic as it is not a by-pass to the town as that already exists and it will not take through traffic away either.

Full Comments – Cycling/Pedestrian Access

Code Comment Response

C1 It is unclear from the plans whether there will be access for pedestrians and cycles from Mill Lane Weston (north of it’s the bridge over the A500) down to CGLRS and its associated cycleway and footway. It is vital to ensure this will be the case to facilitate cyclists and pedestrians from the southeast of the town allowing them to bypass the section of the A5020 between Weston Gate and the junction with Main Road, Weston. This section of road is extremely busy and narrow and is a present deterrent to cycling into Crewe from this SE quadrant. C2 Re cycle routes - generally ignored by cyclists using the existing link road.

C3 At the northern end of the new road I would like to see the access and exit points of the cycle lane give access directly from and to the roundabout, as well as onto the combined cycle/footway from Weston Road and to Savoy Road. Inexperienced cyclists may prefer the presumed safety of a separate cycle lane circumnavigating the roundabout, but experienced cyclists will always want to cycle around the roundabout together with road traffic, as that gives them priority over traffic entering the roundabout and is much quicker.

If you do not provide dropped kerbs that allow cyclists to access the cycle track directly from the roundabout roadway, then experienced cyclists will simply ignore the cycle track and ride along the hard shoulder or the main carriageway instead. The same applies at the other two roundabouts.

C4 I'm very pleased to see that full provision is being made for pedestrian and cyclist use of the new link road on both carriageways, and that it will be a dual carriageway, seemingly with a hard shoulder. I only wish all new dual carriageways could be built to this specification.

C5 Pedestrian and cycle routes are of limited cost benefit in a region and country where it rains all the time - measure the success of the routes alongside the Alderley Edge bypass before investing in such routes elsewhere. C6 If through traffic is removed from Crewe it makes sense to re align the road network to give priority to pedestrians, cyclists and buses, relegating other traffic to a second class position. For example always making traffic lights gives buses in their bus lanes and cycles priority over other vehicles at junctions. C7 It's difficult to support the 'pedestrian and cycle links' referred to in Q3 without examining the details. There are cycle tracks on the Crewe Green Link Road, north section, between the Crewe Green Roundabout and Crewe Hall and they are quite bad. Too little attention is given to the finer details of the cycle track crossing side roads and secondary entrances. I don't expect better for the south section. 41

C10 I'd also query the addition of a cycle link on the proposed new stretch, I could see how access would be granted from the North - but what about from the South (i.e. the A500 itself)? There is currently nothing on the A500 to encourage cycling at the moment; this would seem to be a disjointed part of the plan. C11 It is not clear how the cycleways linking up the existing schemes on University Way and Weston Road onto the Crewe Green Link Road will benefit cyclists. The regional cycle route 70 lies on Whites Lane, just yards south of the scheme and there appears to be no provision for easy access. C12 I mentioned this on the questionnaire. I wrote that provision for cycle access between regional cycle route 70 at Whites Lane and the south end of the link seemed to be lacking. I would say it is not clear from the plans what the provision is. The CGLRS would certainly be a more cycle-friendly solution than the current access to the end of University Way along Weston Road (past Crewe Hall).

Full Comments – General

Code Comment Response

G1 Have any thoughts been put into reducing commuting traffic in other ways such as speaking to businesses to reduce commuting such as encouraging or even mandating working from home at least 1 day per week for example? G2 Re new businesses - there are already many empty units along Weston Road waiting for tenants, there is empty land along the existing link road waiting for tenets, where are the new businesses for them?

G3 I'm very pleased to see that provision is being made for the second railway track which was removed some years ago when the line was singled. I'm sure it will need to be re-doubled in the future. G4 The decision has already been made and this survey and the thoughts and views of the local population count for nothing. G5 What is the point of this "consultation"? The proposal is already committed in the saved Replacement Local Plan 2011. The only issue is when or if the money will ever be made available to pay for it. G6 This survey is very loaded and as such is likely to be very unreliable in providing a view from local people. You are asking for confirmation of your ideas but without supplying all of the information. G7 The drawn information is poorly presented and will therefore be very difficult for non-professionals to understand properly. G8 It is assumed that the Bus Services removed when Nantwich Road Bridge was reconstructed but never returned i.e. Shavington/Crewe Railway Stn/ Crewe Bus Station No.6 will return. The service from the Railway Stn to Town is abysmal with waits of up to 20-30min not uncommon in particular 5pm. G9 It is assumed that the new Railway Bridge will be two track in order to cater for increase in rail traffic should a HS2 Interchange/Parkway Station be built at Radway Green. G10 An imminent loss of habitat. Why the need to develop more business opportunities? West will be swallowed up in to Crewe.

G11 Why have you not published in full the results for the 'AllchangeforCrewe' public engagement Programme carried out in 2010 on your website? How can we make an informed decision on this proposal without having seen the full results from that survey?

How can you make decisions for the future of Crewe based on cherry picked statistics from a survey you have not fully published?

For Example "Good support (over 50% of respondents) for creating new job opportunities at Basford and improving transport links to the motorway;" - How much over 50%? 51, 52? - This does not show you have strong support for this scheme particularly as you have not published everyone’s comments in full despite stating so on your website since January. (See below link). G12 This Survey contains loaded questions that are absurd and below the standard of a proper survey. G13 Why are we asked if we Support the need to provide an alternative route in Q1 but only in Q6 asked if we agree in principle to the proposals? You have clearly stated in your letter to residents "We would like to find out how strongly you support the scheme" - Why are we not asked directly if we support this scheme. Is it because you are afraid you will score below 50% for such a question. Particularly when you are claiming in a previous survey you got over 50% and therefore have strong support!! G14 Disagree with the push to increase rapidly the population of Crewe.

G15 Strongly agree to with all speed developing Crewe into a larger successful business centre, expanding the town centre and growing the population. Improving the road network vastly but also with giving the same importance and finance to developing proper direct cycle ways (not on pavements) and direct pedestrian routes. It would be great if university students &staff would park on their own campus and not down side and main streets.

It can’t be good for property prices especially walking in the area with pyjamas on and groups drinking in front gardens. Who asked the residents of Crewe if we wanted a "uni"? G16 My "Disagree" answer for Q2 is in reference to the issue of public transport. Any improvement will depend on the good will of the bus companies and I don't have any confidence in them having any good will. G17 I am emailing my discontent with the above consultation.

I have only been made aware today by a neighbour of the consultation - despite it directly affecting my property. Apparently our property was included in a photo in the Sentinel on 13th May.

Are our views of no importance? How can such a large scheme with potentially such a large impact go ahead without even a letter to us? Surely this would be a matter of courtesy and is completely alien to the hoops we had to jump through when applying for planning permission for our own home.

I would be grateful if you could contact me and let me know how this has happened and the process and timescales moving forward.

We would also like to see the plans for ourselves (we had no notification of the public consultation) and how these will affect our property and its rural outlook. G18 There needs to be careful consideration and protection for wildlife and fauna in the proposed area. Careful surveys need to be done to ensure there is minimum distraction and disturbance for the above. G19 I am currently reviewing the proposals for the Crewe Green Link Road South on the Cheshire East Website.

I would in considering the proposals published in this consultation like to attend a drop in event.

Having looked at the website I was disappointed to learn that I have missed the event on the 12th May. However, having now read the letter to residents I see there is an event on the 19th. Why have you missed this event off your website? (I also note in the letter it states "We look forward to receiving your completed questionnaires, comments or to seeing you at one of our events on the 12th or 16th May 2011") Was there an event on the 16th somewhere that you have similarly failed to advertise?

Also, please can you explain why you have not published in full the results & comments from last year’s allchangeforcrewe survey despite stating on the website you will do so shortly since December! (Please see link below)

http://www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/busin ess/economic_development_services /crewe_vision/all_change_for_crewe/ public_engagement_programme.asp x G20 Further to the recent press articles regarding the submission of a planning application for the above scheme, being a local resident and a highway engineer I am particularly interested in the project. Specifically can you tell me please what is the current envisaged programme for the scheme, particularly in terms of land purchase, detailed design and construction? G21 There needs to be careful consideration and protection for wildlife and fauna in the proposed area. Careful surveys need to be done to ensure there is minimum distraction and disturbance for the above.

Email responses from residents

Ms Kate Boundy

To Jeanette Bate

I am emailing my discontent with the above consultation.

I have only been made aware today by a neighbour of the consultation - despite it directly affecting my property. Apparently our property was included in a photo in the Sentinel on 13th May.

I would be grateful if you could contact me and let me know how this has happened and the process and timescales moving forward.

We would also like to see the plans for ourselves (we had no notification of the public consultation) and how these will affect our property and its rural outlook.

Yours faithfully, Kate Boundy

Mr Alan Jenney

Jeanette,

I have completed the online questionnaire relating to the Crewe Green Link Road South consultation, but have some other feedback and questions to ask.

I may not be able to come along to the drop-in event that I believe will be at the Lyceum Square Café on Thursday, so I have written them here. I believe this to be a positive development.

Feedback ONE – cycle links I mentioned this on the questionnaire. I wrote that provision for cycle access between regional cycle route 70 at Whites Lane and the south end of the link seemed to be lacking. I would say it is not clear from the plans what the provision is. The CGLRS would certainly be a more cycle-friendly solution than the current access to the end of University Way along Weston Road (past Crewe Hall).

Feedback TWO – signage Not mentioned in the documentation on the website is what changes in signage further afield might be made as part of the scheme. For example, (a) in order to reduce the west-to-east traffic along the A534 Nantwich Road from the Wrexham, Whitchurch and Chester direction, would signage from the A51 bypass around Nantwich suggest using the A500 and the proposed link road to get to the railway station, business parks and industrial parks – perhaps “Crewe (East)” and leave the A534 signage for local destinations Wistaston, Willaston, perhaps “Crewe (West)”? (b) in order to reduce traffic on Old Park Road and part of Weston Road by Crewe Hall, would traffic approaching from the M6 J16 on the single-carriageway part of the A500 be directed to Crewe along the dual-carriageway section of the A500 to turn right onto the southern end of the CGLRS scheme and, vice-versa, to leave Crewe for the motorway using the CGLRS, then turn left along the dual-carriageway section of the A500? (c) in order to reduce traffic (mistakenly) using Main Road in Weston, plus Newcastle Road through Hough and Shavington, will the old A500 signage (still left over since the dual-carriageway opened several years ago) on the Newcastle Road and its approaches (e.g. on the A531 near Wychwood Park) be removed and/or revised?

Feedback THREE – road markings Until the approaches and exits of the roundabout in the middle of the proposed link are needed, could the road markings painted so that traffic passes over it north- south without the need to give way, thus reducing unnecessary bunching of traffic for the time being?

Let me know. Alan Jenney, CEng, MIET.

Dr C Hopkins

Hi Jeanette,

Q1 – Yes Q2 – Strongly agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Strongly agree Q5 – Strongly agree

I hope this helps with your enquiry. Dr. C. Hopkins

Nicholas Hackett

Jeanette

I am currently reviewing the proposals for the Crewe Green Link Road South on the Cheshire East Website.

I would in considering the proposals published in this consultation like to attend a drop in event.

I would have thought the full publication of the previous survey and consultation (Public Engagement Programme) particularly resident’s comments would be vital in helping to inform opinions for this new proposal particularly as you have strongly linked the two. http://www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/business/economic_development_services/crewe_v ision/all_change_for_crewe/public_engagement_programme.aspx

Kind regards, Nicholas Hackett, Resident

Peter Davenport

Further to the recent press articles regarding the submission of a planning application for the above scheme, being a local resident and a highway engineer I am particularly interested in the project. Specifically can you tell me please what is the current envisaged programme for the scheme, particularly in terms of land purchase, detailed design and construction?

Further is the scheme to be designed by the council or will assistance be required, as was utilised on the recently completed Alderley Edge bypass. If so have these consultants been appointed. Further as part of the scheme are there any proposals to amend / review the timings of the signalised roundabout junction at the end of the Haslington Bypass / University Way that already has significant queuing problems?

I thank you in anticipation of your response. Peter Davenport

Richard Froud

15th May 2011

This scheme is long overdue, Crewe could be a great place to live and work if this scheme and many other schemes were carried out, it’s because there are critics of improving the area and certain Cheshire east councillors that have stopped Crewe and Nantwich moving with the times. This scheme should and must be started A.S.A.P. if we do not want to see the area fall further into decline.

Stuart Hood

Hello,

I live on Wychwood Village and understand that I have missed the exhibition and pre-consultation about the above scheme.

How widely was the consultation communicated? I have not received a letter or seen a poster on the notice boards that I regularly view.

Please ensure that the full application consultation is more widely communicated?

Finally has the Campaign to Protect Rural England (of which I'm a member) been consulted?

Regards, Stuart Hood

Email responses from businesses

Peter Foster, North West Regional Director, Sustrans

Jeanette

We would like to make the following comments regarding the proposal to construct 1km of new road between Weston Road, A5020, and the Shavington by-pass, the A500.

1 - We object to the construction of this road if the intention is to add traffic capacity to the highway network. The A-road network is already complete in this area along the A500 and the A5020. Congestion on these roads should be tackled by other means; experience demonstrates that building more capacity is not sustainable in the longer term.

2 - We would not object to the road however if there was a complementary proposal to remove the short section of the A5020 between its junction with the A500 and Weston Road from the strategic road network, and to downgrade Weston Road east of the Crewe Green link road at Crewe Hall to a minor road. The downgrading could only be achieved by physical measures and traffic restrictions, which should be funded as part of the major road scheme.

3 - This will be another very expensive section of road.

4 - Any new road should be assessed knowing that transport has to play its part in carbon reduction.

5 - We do not believe construction of the new road will lead to lasting improvements on the Nantwich Road/Crewe Road access, the A534, as so many journeys are very local. We suggest the way to influence traffic levels on this road is by much more concerted effort in promoting walking, cycling and improvements to local public transport. Whilst the Council's bid to the Local Sustainable Transport Fund is welcome, the Crewe component of this will be small scale compared with the resources and time which will have to be committed to the new road.

Peter Foster North West Regional Director Sustrans, St Paul's Centre, Hightown, Crewe, CW1 3BY Tel: 01270 211030 Fax: 01270 250683

Roy Senior, Branch Manager, City Electrical Factors Ltd

Q1 – Yes Q2 – Strongly agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Strongly agree Q5 – Strongly agree

Shaun Lyons, Operations Support Manager, Gallagher Limited Q1 – Yes Q2 – Strongly agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Strongly agree Q5 – Strongly agree

Alan Dalton, Chapel House Cars Q1 – Yes Q2 – Strongly agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Strongly agree Q5 – Agree Comments - There needs to be careful consideration and protection for wildlife and fauna in the proposed area. Careful surveys need to be done to ensure there is minimum distraction and disturbance for the above.

Weston Cricket Club Members Q1 – Yes Q2 – Strongly agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Agree Q5 – Strongly Agree Comments – It is most vital to have this link or Nantwich Road will always be congested. Why construct the A500 Bypass and not link Crewe? Let’s have it sooner not later.

Crewe Van Centre Q1 – Yes Q2 – Agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Agree Q5 – Strongly Agree

Mrs C M Butler-Meadows, Crewe Carpets Q1 – Yes Q2 – Strongly Agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Strongly Agree Q5 – Strongly Agree

Alec Ross Carpets Q1 – Yes Q2 – Strongly agree Q3 – Yes Q4 – Strongly Agree Q5 – Strongly Agree Comments – Urgent attention is needed on Nantwich Road, Station Area. We are finding customers are avoiding this area because of gridlock.

Addendum to Statement of Community Involvement – Crewe Green Link Road South, October 2012

The following pages contain:

• Addendum to Statement of Community Consultation to accompany revised planning application for Crewe Green Link Road South.

Addendum to Statement of Community Involvement

Crewe Green Link Road South (CGLRS) – Unlocking Economic Growth October 2012

Prepared by Nick Lingard, Assistant Project Sponsor - Highways & Transportation, Cheshire East Highways October 2012

CONTENTS

Introduction 1

Responses / Comments 1

Conclusion 2

Appendix

AA – Letter and Briefing Note

AB – Consultee Response

AC – Cheshire East Council Reply to Response

PRE-REVISED PLANNING APPLICATION CONSULTATION 2012 – CREWE GREEN LINK ROAD SOUTH (CGLRS)

Introduction

The previous permission (ref: 11/1982N) granted on 12 October 2011 was subject to a number of planning conditions, and it was subsequently identified that certain additional elements for the scheme needed to be approved by the Local Planning Authority and that the inclusion of these, and some elements covered by the previous planning conditions would best be resolved in an updated planning application for the whole scheme.

Due to the alignment and scale of the road being substantially the same Cheshire East Council concluded that a limited ‘pre revised planning application’ consultation / public information exercise should be undertaken to supplement the extensive consultation process undertaken for the previously approved scheme. This exercise was intended to inform local politicians, ward members and the parish council members of the key changes to the scheme.

The exercise comprised the following:

• a letter and general arrangement plan of the scheme was sent out to local parish councils and members for the wards of Crewe East and Haslington on 21st August 2012; and,

• a detailed briefing note sent to Weston Parish Council on 3rd October 2012.

Copies of the letter and mailing list, and the briefing notes are included within Appendix AA to this addendum.

Responses / Comments

No responses or comments have been received following the letter to local parish councillors and members for the wards of Cheshire East and Haslington.

The letter to Weston and Basford Parish Council was followed up with a briefing note to give additional details of the key changes to the scheme. Weston and Basford Parish Council responded expressing concern regarding the inclusion in the revised planning application of a borrow pit on land to the south of the A500. The basis of their concern is the potential impact on the local roads of the borrow pit operation. A copy of this response is included in Appendix AB for reference.

Cheshire East Council provided a further summary response on 10th October 2012 (refer Appendix AB). Suitable amendments have also been made to the planning design and access statement to make it clear that should the borrow pit be required then its operation should be suitably conditioned through planning to ensure that due consideration is given to these concerns and mitigating operational impacts before the borrow pit operation could be commenced.

Weston and Basford Parish Council also noted that a presentation to the Parish members would be welcomed – this is currently being arranged. This was specifically requested so that members could get a comprehensive picture of the proposed developments and to avoid any ambiguity between the highway and development aspects.

Weston and Basford Parish Council concluded by stating that other than the aforementioned concerns regarding borrow pit location and operation they have no major concerns with the proposed scheme.

As a result of the concern raised by Weston and Basford Parish Council regarding the details of borrow pit operation Cheshire East Council is currently preparing a note to provide typical details of how the borrow pit might operate, should it be required.

Conclusions

The objective of this consultation / public information exercise has been to provide local politicians, parish councils and ward members with a summary of the key changes to the scheme proposals which make up the revised planning application. Full contact details were provided if any consultee required further information or had specific concerns.

The exercise has been effective in eliciting a response from Weston and Basford Parish Council highlighting their concerns over the proposed location and operation of the borrow pit.

An informal presentation is being arranged with Basford and Weston Parish Council such that the Parish receives a complete picture of all proposals and to avoid any ambiguity between the highway and any potential development aspects.

No further consultation activities are proposed preceding the submission of the revised planning application.

2 APPENDIX AA – LETTER AND BRIEFING NOTE

The following pages contain:

• Letter to Local Parish Councils and Ward Members

• Mailing list for letter

• Weston and Basford Parish Council Briefing Note

Dear X

CREWE GREEN LINK ROAD SOUTH (CGLRS) – UPDATED PLANNING APPLICATION

Planning permission (ref: 11/1982N) for CGLRS was approved on 12th October 2011 and was subject to a number of planning conditions. Subsequently it was identified that certain additional elements for the scheme needed to be included and that the inclusion of these, and some elements covered by the previous planning conditions would best be wrapped up in an updated planning application for the whole scheme. The alignment and scale of the road are substantially the same; the additional elements will include:

• Alternative railway underbridge option (single span carrying Crewe to Stoke railway line over the carriageway); • New cycle/pedestrian access to scheme from A500 / Mill Lane; • the proposed construction site compounds; • potential locations for a borrow pit(s); • soil storage areas, possibly in the form of noise protection bunds; • flood compensation area(s); • topsoil mounds to be used in the landscaping scheme; and • newt habitat mitigation area.

It is anticipated the updated planning application will be submitted in early October 2012 and the application is proposed to be determined by December 2012. Construction works are programmed to commence in early 2014 with a scheme opening in autumn 2015.

I enclose a copy of the latest layout drawing (Ref: B1772401/P/100/004), which highlights the various elements listed above.

In addition, it has come to our attention that the masterplanners for the Basford East site intend to hold a series of exhibitions following the Local Plan Town Strategy in autumn 2012. We will take that opportunity to have a display for the new Crewe Green Link Road at these events.

Finally, I can confirm that we propose to hold a member briefing for the scheme in September 2012 to provide members with a further update. I will be in contact shortly to confirm dates.

Should you require further information or wish to discuss the scheme please do not hesitate to contact me or Nick Lingard ([email protected]).

Yours Sincerely

Paul Griffiths

Principal Transport Officer Cheshire East Borough Council e-mail: [email protected]

/w9í 9 Dw99b [Lb Y wh !5 {h Ü ÇI !a 9b 5a 9b Ç{ /h b {Ü [Ç!ÇLh b [L{Ç h wD!b L{!ÇLh b /h b Ç!/Ç I / t ! /" / W b / I / /í [!

# /$% $ D$$ t ! /" W { { w / /í ![t

& {' (") (D$!* t ! /" / # a a { 5 & I / /í ' v D

+ I! t ! /" W ! * #+ ,-,.

, í $! .!. t ! /" 5& h 0 [1 5 & / / /í ' Ç!

/ í ) $) 1$! . I! /- W I 3 / [ í { - / /í '' 3wí

/- 5& a 0 ! / w {& / / /í 5í

2 í ) $) 1$! . /$% $ 9! /- a a 3 { !& / / /í ' 3b I

3 /- 5& b t { b - / /í .D

4 /- / Ç 0 a - { / / /í ' 35[

Page 1 of 2

Lingard, Nick

From: LINGARD, Nick [[email protected]] Sent: 03 October 2012 16:59 To: Lingard, Nick Subject: FW: Crewe Green Llink Road (South) - Revised Planning Application Briefing Note Attachments: CGLRS Weston Parish briefing note_031012 v0.pdf; B1772401_P_100_004 Rev1.pdf

From: LINGARD, Nick Sent: 03 October 2012 16:56 To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: GRIFFITHS, Paul Subject: Crewe Green Llink Road (South) - Revised Planning Application Briefing Note

Good afternoon John,

Re: Crewe Green Link Road (South) - Revised Planning Application

As requested by Paul Griffiths of Cheshire East Council, please find attached for your information a briefing note regarding the proposed updated planning application submission for the above scheme, together with a general arrangement plan.

It is proposed to submit the revised application on 24 October 2012 and Cheshire East Council would like to capture any pre-application comments Weston Parish Council may have prior to submission.

If you have any comments or queries regarding the above then please do not hesitate to contact me or Paul Griffiths.

Kind regards

Nick Lingard

Nick Lingard Cheshire East Highways mobile: 07980 690815 telephone: 01270 686352 e-mail: [email protected]

************************************************************************ Confidentiality: This email and its contents and any attachments are intended only for the above named. As the email may contain confidential or legally privileged information, if you are not the above named person or responsible for delivery to the above named, or suspect that you are not an intended recipient please delete or destroy the email and any attachments immediately.

Security and Viruses: This note confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. We cannot accept any responsibility for any damage or loss caused by software viruses.

Monitoring: The Council undertakes monitoring of both incoming and outgoing emails. You should therefore be aware that if you send an email to a person within the Council it may be subject to any monitoring deemed necessary by the organisation from time to time. The views of the author may not necessarily reflect those

25/10/2012 Page 2 of 2

of the Council.

Access as a public body: The Council may be required to disclose this email (or any response to it) under the Freedom of Information Act, 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in the Act.

Legal documents: The Council does not accept service of legal documents by email. ************************************************************************

25/10/2012 CREWE GREEN LINK ROAD SOUTH (CGLRS) – UPDATED PLANNING APPLICATION BRIEFING NOTE

Planning permission (ref: 11/1982N) for CGLRS was approved on 12th October 2011 and was subject to a number of planning conditions. Subsequently it was identified that certain additional elements for the scheme needed to be approved by the Local Planning Authority and that the inclusion of these, and some elements covered by the previous planning conditions would best be resolved in an updated planning application for the whole scheme. The alignment and scale of the road are substantially the same; the additional elements will include:

• Alternative railway underbridge option (single span carrying Crewe to Stoke railway line over the carriageway) – the previous application included a twin span option with a central pier. This amendment was a result of value engineering to reduce the overall scheme cost, but has other benefits for constructability, visibility and maintenance;

• New cycle / pedestrian access to scheme from A500 / Mill Lane;

• The proposed construction site compounds – following review it was concluded that insufficient allowance had been made within the previous application for construction site compounds, therefore additional areas have been identified to provide for the expected requirement;

• Potential location for a borrow pit – the revised application includes provision for a borrow pit on land to the south of the A500. However, the results of ground investigations on the main site suggest that this may not be needed. The provision is being included on the application so that it is available should the Contractor consider it necessary. In this event the impact on local roads and routes would be carefully considered and managed to minimise the impact on local residents and road users;

• Soil storage bund areas - the scheme is likely to create surplus soil during its construction. It is proposed that some of this could be used alongside the road to discourage access to the neighbouring fields until they are developed as part of the Basford East development. Further bunding is proposed alongside the main Crewe – London railway line to the west. It is proposed that this will be used as part of the Basford East development e.g. for noise attenuation and landscaping purposes;

• Flood compensation area – this area is required to compensate for the loss of flood plain due to construction of the road;

• Great Crested Newt (GCN) habitat mitigation area – two areas are to be designated as habitat for GCN to compensate for the loss of habitat due to road construction. One area will be located on the main site to the west of the proposed road alignment; and the second area is to be located to the south of the A500. Separate planning applications for these habitat areas were submitted on 3 October 2012. The fast-tracking of this element of the scheme is so that (subject to securing planning permission) work can start on these areas this winter in order for the habitat to be established by autumn 2013 when GCN relocation is due to take place, and in advance of the main construction works; and,

• Temporary Topsoil storage area – This is to safeguard and temporarily store topsoil during the construction;

• Modification improvement to the A5020 Weston Road westbound roundabout approach – it is proposed to widen the carriageway locally to the roundabout to give a dedicated short left turn lane to improve traffic flow down the new Crewe Green Link Road South.

The attached layout drawing (Ref: B1772401/P/100/004) highlights the road scheme and the various elements listed above.

It is anticipated the updated planning application will be submitted in late October 2012 and Cheshire East Council (CEC) would like to capture any pre-application comments prior to submission.

It is hoped that the application will be determined in January 2013. Advance environmental mitigation works are proposed to be undertaken during 2013, with the main construction works programmed to commence in early 2014, with a scheme opening in summer / autumn 2015.

In addition, it has come to our attention that the masterplanners for the Basford East site intend to hold a series of exhibitions following the Local Plan Town Strategy in autumn 2012. CEC will take that opportunity to display the new Crewe Green Link Road at these events.

Should you require further information, or wish to discuss the scheme please do not hesitate to contact Paul Griffiths ([email protected]) or Nick Lingard ([email protected]).

APPENDIX AB – CONSULTEE RESPONSE

The following pages contain:

• Response to Briefing Note from Weston and Basford Parish Council

5 Lingard, Nick

Subject: FW: Crewe Green Link Road South - updated pre application briefing note Importance: High

From: John Cornell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 04 October 2012 13:19 To: GRIFFITHS, Paul Cc: John Densem; HAMMOND, John (Councillor); David Owen Subject: Crewe Green Link Road South - updated pre application briefing note

Hi Paul

I've tried to contact you unsuccessfully this morning, hence this email.

Thanks for sending briefing note and plan through to John Densem.

Having studied your documentation we're very concerned about the proposed 'borrow pit' adjacent to our new allotments on the south side of the A500. The only access point to this area would be along the narrow and tortuous Whites Lane or single track Mill Lane, both of which are totally inadequate to take the volumes of heavy traffic likely to be involved, even for a temporary period.

Should a formal application be submitted with this shown as per your plan then my Council would almost certainly be lodging a strong objection and would be prepared to argue this before your committee. Can we please have an urgent word to discuss this matter with a view to investigating an alternative site prior to any formal submission.

My Council will also want a total reassurance regarding the cut and fill required for the Newt habitat mitigation area south of the A500. Again if this were to be substantial, how are the lorries going to get to and from the site? We don't want to be put in the position of having to object to this as well!

John Densem, I know has spoken to you about your request to address our Parish Council next Thursday. We consider this to be totally inappropriate at this stage, since in our judgement any presentation on this should be coupled with Basford East, to ensure a comprehensive picture is given to our members. and to avoid any ambiguity between the planning and highway aspects. Adrian Spawforth and his team addressed a closed session of the Parish Council in July and are coming back to update the Parish Council on 20th November, immediately prior to the full public consultation exercise. We would request that you form a part of that session. Provided we can sort out this borrow pit issue and Newt habitat, then I don't envisage a major problem.

I'm personally away on holiday from the middle of next week until the end of October. Given that I'm Chair of the Parish Council Planning Committee and probably the only member that has a real handle on this one we need to sort it out before I go - ie over the next two or three days.

Thanking you in anticipation for your help.

Regards

John.

PS My phone no. is . ************************************************************************ Confidentiality: This email and its contents and any attachments are intended only for the above named. As the email may contain confidential or legally privileged information, if you are not the above named person or responsible for delivery to the above named, or suspect that you are not an intended recipient please delete or destroy the email and any attachments immediately.

Security and Viruses: This note confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. We cannot accept any responsibility for any damage or loss caused by

25/10/2012 software viruses.

Legal documents: The Council does not accept service of legal documents by email. ************************************************************************

25/10/2012

APPENDIX AC – CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL REPLY TO RESPONSE

The following pages contain:

• Cheshire East Council Reply to Response from Weston and Basford Parish Council

7 Lingard, Nick

Subject: FW: Crewe Green Link Road South - updated pre application briefing note

From: GRIFFITHS, Paul Sent: 10 October 2012 10:24 To: John Cornell Cc: John Densem; HAMMOND, John (Councillor); David Owen; DRAKE, Andrew; LINGARD, Nick Subject: RE: Crewe Green Link Road South - updated pre application briefing note

Hi John,

Further to this and following on from our phone call last week and a conversation with Cllr Hammond yesterday I can give the following update:

1. The borrow pit is only a reserve option should not enough suitable material be won on the main site. Our geotechnical investigations suggest that enough adequate material can be won but a fall back position will ensure the level of cost risk is reduced.

2. The site of the borrow pit is on land controlled by the Co_op group. The developer will have to contribute to the costs of the link road in any case through any future S106 agreement. Potentially this arrangement could offer a partial 'in kind' contribution

3. It will be necessary, if we are to include this fall back option in the tender documentation, to secure this land via a compulsory purchase order. This will be a stronger case with the land in question as we are already working up CPO plans for the Co-op and an inspector will be able to see the clear link and benefits to each party.

4. We fully understand the concern about the potential Heavy goods vehicles that a borrow pit operation could generate. We are investigating access options over the existing bridge to Crotia Mill farm. This will be dependent on a structural assessment of the bridge.

5. I have already confirmed that I am available if required to come and discuss this issue in more detail at your closed session on the 20th November - where I hope to be able to confirm access arrangements ,etc for your consideration.

Hope that helps and see you soon.

Paul

Paul Griffiths Principal Transportation Officer Strategic Highways and Transportation

Tel No 01270 686353 Fax No 01270 537352

Email [email protected] Web address www.cheshireeast.gov.uk

From: John Cornell [[email protected]] Sent: 04 October 2012 13:18 To: GRIFFITHS, Paul Cc: John Densem; HAMMOND, John (Councillor); David Owen Subject: Crewe Green Link Road South - updated pre application briefing note

Hi Paul

I've tried to contact you unsuccessfully this morning, hence this email.

Thanks for sending briefing note and plan through to John Densem.

25/10/2012 Having studied your documentation we're very concerned about the proposed 'borrow pit' adjacent to our new allotments on the south side of the A500. The only access point to this area would be along the narrow and tortuous Whites Lane or single track Mill Lane, both of which are totally inadequate to take the volumes of heavy traffic likely to be involved, even for a temporary period.

Thanking you in anticipation for your help.

Regards

John.

PS My phone no. is ************************************************************************ Confidentiality: This email and its contents and any attachments are intended only for the above named. As the email may contain confidential or legally privileged information, if you are not the above named person or responsible for delivery to the above named, or suspect that you are not an intended recipient please delete or destroy the email and any attachments immediately.

Legal documents: The Council does not accept service of legal documents by email. ************************************************************************

25/10/2012