DOCSLIB.ORG

Trophy Fish Program. Congratulation Goes out to the 35 Anglers That Entered 274 Fish in 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trophy Fish Program. Congratulation Goes out to the 35 Anglers That Entered 274 Fish in 2020 Trophy Fish Program 1968-2020 Stream & Lake Records Nevada DepartmentPepartMut.t oFof WildliFt,Wildlife Cover: 10 year old Braedon Matthews fly fishing for the first time with his grandpa at Hobart Reservoir. Introduction written by Patrick Sollberger, Fisheries Staff Specialist Trophy Fish Program compiled and edited by Shelby Lawry State of Nevada Steve Sisolak, Governor Department of Wildlife Tony Wasley, Director Fisheries Division Jon C. Sjberg, Chief of Fisheries Board of Wildlife Commissioners Tiffany East, Chair………………………………………………………………Reno Tom Barnes, Vice Chair…………………………………………………………Elko Tommy Caviglia…………………………………………………………Henderson Jon Almberg…………………………………………………………………..……Ely Shane Rogers……………………………………………………………….Las Vegas Kerstan Hubbs……………………………………………………………Henderson David McNinch…………………………………………………………………Reno Casey D. Kiel…………………………………………………………………Lovelock Ron Pierini…………………………………………………………...………...Minden Persons are free to use material in this report for educational or informational purposes. However, since most reports are part of continuing studies, persons intending to use this material in scientific publications should obtain prior permission from the Department of Wildlife. In all cases, tentative conclusions should be identified as such in quotation, and due credit would be appreciated. This program or publication receives funding through the Federal Aid in Sport Fish and/or Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and sex. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager Director U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, Virginia 22203 Reno, Nevada 89511-9939 Introduction ............................................................................................................................i Record Fish of Nevada ..........................................................................................................1 Recipients of “Largest Fish of the Year” Certificates for 2019 ........................................5 All Trophy Fish Entrants for 2019 ......................................................................................10 Summary of Nevada’s Lakes and Streams Record Fish, 1968-2019 .............................33 Number of Trophy Fish Entries by Water, 1968-2019 ....................................................93 Summary of all Entries, 1968-2019...................................................................................115 Summary of Nevada Native Fish Slam 2012 -2019........................................................119 Bill Hammons with his 1 lb. Tiger Trout caught in Spooner Lake and identified as a Water Record Only. 2020 NEVADA TROPHY FISH PROGRAM Welcome to the Nevada Department of Wildlife’s Trophy Fish Program that began in 1968. This booklet recognizes the talents, or luck, of anglers for catching notable-sized fish from many of the over 800 waterbodies found around the state. This program allows anglers to catch 30 different fish species, each having a designated minimum weight for entry. To help us out, please include on the entry form the “specific location” where your fish was caught. Most importantly, add the “mountain range” or other location-identifying characteristics for stream caught fish, because there are multiple streams in the state having the same name. Additionally, it is important to include a clear photograph for us to make a positive identification. Several species look very similar, so holding the fish broadside with the mouth closed for example can be critical. Multiple photos taken at different angles may also help. It is essential that if you believe you have caught a state record fish, you must have it weighed on a scale that is “certified” and have an NDOW employee witness it. Although 2020 was an unusual year, it still was great for enjoying the outdoors in solitude. Anglers took advantage of the wonderful fishing the state had to offer and entered their catches into the Trophy Fish Program. Congratulation goes out to the 35 anglers that entered 274 fish in 2020. Of the total fish caught, 259 fish met the minimum weight, with 180 being Carp, 30 being Cutthroat Trout, and 21 being Rainbow Trout. The remaining fish were a mix of eight different species. The top angler was Brenden Burnham, entering 129 Carp (over 15 pounds) and 2 Channel Catfish (over 10 pounds). He caught the only state record for the year, a 35 pound 3 ounce Carp from Virginia Lake. Furthermore, he caught an unofficial state record Carp weighing 36 pounds 7 ounces from the same body of water. Steve Godsell came in at a distant second having entered 26 Carp and Louis Varela entering 13 Carp. These fish came from local ponds around the Reno area. Special mention should also go to Walter Ricci, catching 5 Carp out of Lake Mead ranging from 18 pounds to 22 pounds 10 ounces. Adam Garcia entered 23 Cutthroat Trout from Pyramid Lake all weighing over 10 pounds. His largest being a massive 20 pounds 8 ounces. Rick Gomez, fishing out of Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, entered an amazing 11 Rainbow Trout and 7 tiger trout, with the largest weighing 6 pounds 5 ounces and 6 pounds 2 ounces, respectively. Entries for establishing “water records only” need not meet the minimum species weight requirements and many are caught from water bodies having no previous entry. This year, 35 new water records were established, mostly for streams. Nevada Department of Wildlife manages fisheries in over 600 streams and rivers around the state, many having remarkable fisheries but receiving little angling use. Additionally, some of the over 200 lakes, reservoirs, and ponds continue to be without records, especially for some species. Like last year, Bill Hammons continued his efforts to increase his angling resume by adding another 10 fish that established new records or broke existing ones. Great Job! Finally, in 2020, congratulation goes to Michael John Matus, the 21st angler to earn a Nevada Native Fish Slam, which he began in 2017. The Native Fish Slam is a great way to explore the diverse, but infrequently visited streams that overshadow the state. As usual, the following pages describe current and historical trophy fish catches from Nevada’s waters. We hope the great success that anglers found last year will excite you to head out and enjoy the great fishing Nevada has to offer. Record Fish of Nevada 2020 Michael Huffman with his 19 lb. 1 This 4 lb. 3 oz. Smallmouth Bass was caugth oz. Carp caught in Lake Mead. in Topaz Lake by Andrew Schadegg.. Harold D. Barry with a 6 lb. 3 oz. Wiper caught in Lahontan Reservoir. Chris Daily caught this 8 lb. 2 oz. Rainbow Trout out of Bassett Lake. 1 2 RECORD FISH OF NEVADA NEVADA STATE RECORDS NEVADA DATE WORLD SPECIES WEIGHT LENGTH NAME OF WATER RECORD HOLDER CAUGHT RECORD Common Name Lbs. Oz. Inches Lake or Stream Angler Name All Tackle Bass, Largemouth 12 0 26 Lake Mead Michael R. Geary 3/8/1999 22 lbs 4 oz Bass, Smallmouth 8 11 21.5 Sheep Creek Reservoir Curtis Ockerman 5/31/2010 11 lbs 15 oz Bass, Spotted 4 6 19.75 Sparks Marina Dante Ray 4/19/2013 10 lbs 7 oz Bass, Striped 63 0 49 Lake Mohave Allan S. Cole 3/15/2001 69 lbs 9 oz Bass, White 4 0 19 Lahontan Reservoir Greg Ackerman 5/13/1984 6 lbs 13 oz Carp 35 3 38 Virginia Lake Brenden Burnham 3/8/2020 75 lbs 11 oz Catfish, Bullhead 6 11 21.5 Lida Junction Pond Wayne B. Logan 6/29/2004 7 lbs 7 oz Catfish, Channel 32 7 35.5 South Fork Reservoir Scott Barrett 6/27/2011 58 lbs 0 oz Catfish, White 17 4 31.75 Lahontan Reservoir Corey Ryan 6/26/2008 19 lbs 5 oz Catfish, White 17 4 33.2 Humboldt River Jose Mendoza 9/17/2005 19 lbs 5 oz Crappie, Black 3 5 16.5 Weber Reservoir Lake A. Pressey 4/21/2017 5 lbs 0 oz Crappie, White 3 1 16.1 Rye Patch Reservoir David Lorain 6/17/2006 5 lbs 3 oz Grayling, Arctic 0 15 13.75 Desert Creek George Delich 7/1/1978 5 lbs 15 oz Muskie, Tiger 17 10 39.75 Barth Pit Jason A. Edgar 5/2/2002 51 lbs 3 oz Perch, Sacramento 4 9 17 Pyramid Lake John Battcher 7/18/1971 3 lbs 3 oz Perch, Yellow 1 8 13.3 Dufurrena Ponds Warren Todd Goodale 5/23/1987 4 lbs 3 oz Perch, Yellow 1 8 13.5 Wildhorse Reservoir John A Shorter III 2/16/2019 4 lbs 3 oz Salmon, Kokanee 4 13 25.7 Lake Tahoe Dick Bournique 7/31/1973 9 lbs 10 oz Salmon, Silver 8 12 28.5 Lake Mead William Musso 5/9/1974 33 lbs 4 oz Salmon, Silver 8 12 30.3 Lake Mead Charles W. Caskey 10/25/1974 33 lbs 4 oz Sunfish, Bluegill 3 10 15.25 Colorado River Mike Tahash 9/14/2010 4 lbs 12 oz Sunfish, Green 1 13 12.75 Battle Mtn. H.S. Pond Keegan Quintana 6/23/2010 2 lbs 2 oz Sunfish, Pumpkinseed 0 15 10.13 Peavine Ponds Dante Ray 8/2/2009 1 lb 6 oz Sunfish, Redear 2 5 13.75 Colorado River Bill Condon 6/26/2004 5 lbs 12 oz Trout, Brook 5 10 22.8 Bull Run Reservoir Richard Baker 7/19/1980 14 lbs 8 oz Trout, Brown 27 5 33 Cave Lake Dennis Mangum 12/9/1984 42 lbs 1 oz Trout, Bull 4 6 22 Jarbidge River, WF Rex Shelburne 7/9/1985 32 lbs 0 oz Trout, Cutthroat 24 12 33.5 Pyramid Lake Tim Bayles 2/27/2005 41 lbs 0 oz * Trout, Golden 0 15 14.5 Hidden Lakes Don Capps 8/31/1969 11 lbs 0 oz Trout, Mackinaw 37 6 44 Lake Tahoe Robert Aronsen 6/21/1974 72 lbs 0 oz Trout, Rainbow 16 8 30.5 Ruby Lake NWR Mike Mott 2/10/2011 48 lbs 0 oz Trout, Rainbow x Cutthroat 24 10 36 Pyramid Lake Lloyd Lowery 4/3/1976 34 lbs 11 oz Trout, Tiger 15 9 28 Ruby Lake NWR Joe Elegante 3/20/2011 20 lbs 13 oz Walleye 15 4 33 Lahontan Reservoir Billy Foster 4/10/1998 25 lbs 0 oz Whitefish, Mountain 3 9 18.5 Truckee River Kirill Solovykh 9/11/2011 5 lbs 8 oz Wiper, White x Striped Bass 25 9 33 Lahontan Reservoir Adam Truran 6/6/2009 27 lbs 5 oz NOTE: These records are officially recognized by the Nevada Department of Wildlife as state records established from the year 1968, the first year of the Nevada Trophy Fish Program through December 2018.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tectonic Influences on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Walker Lane: an Incipient Transform Fault Along the Evolving Pacific – North American Plate Boundary
    Arizona Geological Society Digest 22 2008 Tectonic influences on the spatial and temporal evolution of the Walker Lane: An incipient transform fault along the evolving Pacific – North American plate boundary James E. Faulds and Christopher D. Henry Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA ABSTRACT Since ~30 Ma, western North America has been evolving from an Andean type mar- gin to a dextral transform boundary. Transform growth has been marked by retreat of magmatic arcs, gravitational collapse of orogenic highlands, and periodic inland steps of the San Andreas fault system. In the western Great Basin, a system of dextral faults, known as the Walker Lane (WL) in the north and eastern California shear zone (ECSZ) in the south, currently accommodates ~20% of the Pacific – North America dextral motion. In contrast to the continuous 1100-km-long San Andreas system, discontinuous dextral faults with relatively short lengths (<10-250 km) characterize the WL-ECSZ. Cumulative dextral displacement across the WL-ECSZ generally decreases northward from ≥60 km in southern and east-central California, to ~25 km in northwest Nevada, to negligible in northeast California. GPS geodetic strain rates average ~10 mm/yr across the WL-ECSZ in the western Great Basin but are much less in the eastern WL near Las Vegas (<2 mm/ yr) and along the northwest terminus in northeast California (~2.5 mm/yr). The spatial and temporal evolution of the WL-ECSZ is closely linked to major plate boundary events along the San Andreas fault system. For example, the early Miocene elimination of microplates along the southern California coast, southward steps in the Rivera triple junction at 19-16 Ma and 13 Ma, and an increase in relative plate motions ~12 Ma collectively induced the first major episode of deformation in the WL-ECSZ, which began ~13 Ma along the N60°W-trending Las Vegas Valley shear zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead National Recreation Area Lake Meadsummer 2013 National Recreation Area
    National Park Service Park Newspaper U.S. Department of the Interior Lake Mead National Recreation Area Lake MeadSummer 2013 National Recreation Area Borrow a Lifejacket insure the proper size. The loaner lifejackets including education, warnings and citations. The point of the rule isn't to ticket boaters, but to Drowning is the number one cause of fatalities at must be returned before dusk to allow ensure that the most polluting engines are kept Lake Mead National Recreation Area. This loss rangers to inspect and properly store them. off the lake. As time passes, the number of non- of life can be prevented by wearing a lifejacket. Please remember to never leave children compliant PWCs will decline through attrition. unattended. Drowning is preventable if you put on a lifejacket. Wear One for Life! PWCs that meet the standards through the use of direct-injection two-stroke or New Personal Watercraft four-stroke engines are not subject to this prohibition and are still allowed on the lakes. Regulation in Effect Engines that meet the regulations should have an In an effort to safeguard the waters within Lake emission control information label that clearly Mead National Recreation Area, personal water- states that they conform to clean emissions stan- craft (PWC) must now meet 2006 Environmental dards. Boats are not impacted by this regulation. Protection Agency emission standards in order to operate within the park. This includes the waters of A list of frequently asked questions and PWC Lake Mead, Lake Mohave and the Colorado River. models that meet the emissions standards can be This year there are new Lifejacket Loaner found online at: Stations at Boulder Beach and Cottonwood “Lake Mead supplies drinking water for millions www.nps.gov/lake/parkmgmt/twostroke.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Third, Incline, and Rosewood Creek Section 206 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Project
    EN V I RON M EN T A L CON SU L T A N T S GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT REPORT THIRD, INCLINE, AND ROSEWOOD CREEK SECTION 206 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District Sacramento, CA Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. Sacramento, CA January 2002 Geomorphic Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary............................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................1-1 2.0 Objectives ...............................................................................................2-1 3.0 Setting.....................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Watershed Areas and Topography...............................................3-1 3.2 Geology and Soils ........................................................................3-5 3.3 Land-Use Overview......................................................................3-8 3.3.1 Modern Land Use ..............................................................3-8 3.3.2 Historic Land Use ..............................................................3-9 3.3.3 Native American Use .........................................................3-9 3.3.4 Transportation....................................................................3-9 3.3.5 Logging............................................................................3-10 3.3.6 Grazing ............................................................................3-12
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas Wash and Lake Mead
    Publications (WR) Water Resources 1996 Synthetic organic compounds: Las Vegas Wash and Lake Mead National Water Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA): Nevada Basin and Range Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/water_pubs Part of the Biogeochemistry Commons, Desert Ecology Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Repository Citation National Water Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA): Nevada Basin and Range (1996). Synthetic organic compounds: Las Vegas Wash and Lake Mead. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/water_pubs/79 This Technical Report is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Technical Report in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Technical Report has been accepted for inclusion in Publications (WR) by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION and industrial compounds), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's), phthalales, and phenols were detected at one or both The Nevada Basin and Range (NVBR) study unit of the of these sites. Many of these compounds are persistent in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Tahoe Geographic Response Plan
    Lake Tahoe Geographic Response Plan El Dorado and Placer Counties, California and Douglas and Washoe Counties, and Carson City, Nevada September 2007 Prepared by: Lake Tahoe Response Plan Area Committee (LTRPAC) Lake Tahoe Geographic Response Plan September 2007 If this is an Emergency… …Involving a release or threatened release of hazardous materials, petroleum products, or other contaminants impacting public health and/or the environment Most important – Protect yourself and others! Then: 1) Turn to the Immediate Action Guide (Yellow Tab) for initial steps taken in a hazardous material, petroleum product, or other contaminant emergency. First On-Scene (Fire, Law, EMS, Public, etc.) will notify local Dispatch (via 911 or radio) A complete list of Dispatch Centers can be found beginning on page R-2 of this plan Dispatch will make the following Mandatory Notifications California State Warning Center (OES) (800) 852-7550 or (916) 845-8911 Nevada Division of Emergency Management (775) 687-0300 or (775) 687-0400 National Response Center (800) 424-8802 Dispatch will also consider notifying the following Affected or Adjacent Agencies: County Environmental Health Local OES - County Emergency Management Truckee River Water Master (775) 742-9289 Local Drinking Water Agencies 2) After the Mandatory Notifications are made, use Notification (Red Tab) to implement the notification procedures described in the Immediate Action Guide. 3) Use the Lake Tahoe Basin Maps (Green Tab) to pinpoint the location and surrounding geography of the incident site. 4) Use the Lake and River Response Strategies (Blue Tab) to develop a mitigation plan. 5) Review the Supporting Documentation (White Tabs) for additional information needed during the response.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Water Resource Plan | May 2018 Final
    AMERICAN RIVER BASIN Storm Water Resource Plan | May 2018 Final Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board using funds from Proposition 1. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the foregoing, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. American River Basin Storm Water Resource Plan – Final Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Intent and Content ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 2 2.0 WATERSHED IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................................... 3 2.1 Watershed Boundaries (IRWMP Section 2.1) ..................................................................... 3 2.2 Internal Boundaries (IRWMP Sections 2.2, 2.8, & 2.9) ...................................................... 5 2.3 Water and Environmental Resources (IRWMP Sections 2.6.2, 2.6.3, & 2.8) ................. 11 2.4 Natural Watershed Processes (IRWMP Sections 2.6.1, 2.6.2, & 2.6.3) ........................... 13 2.5 Watershed Issues and Priorities (IRWMP Sections 2.6.2, 2.7 to 2.9, & Apdx. B) .........
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead National Recreation Area Cycle 5 Report
    5RDG,QYHQWRU\DQG&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQW Lake Mead National Recreation Area LAKE Cycle 5 Report Prepared By: Federal Highway Administration Road Inventory Program (RIP) Data Collected: 05/2012 Report Date: 01/2013 Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada and Arizona ^_ ^_ Salt Lake City ^_ Carson City Cheyenne Denver^_ ! Colorado Springs Las Vegas ! !Long Beach ! ! Anaheim ! Lake MeadAlbuquerque^_ Santa Ana National Recreation! Area !San Diego Phoenix ^_! Mesa Tucson ! El Paso ! DCV = Data Collection Vehicle TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 1 2. PARK ROUTE INVENTORY 5RXWH,'V6XEFRPSRQHQWV &KDQJHV5HSRUW $V$SSOLFDEOH 2 – 1 3. PARK SUMMARY INFORMATION 3DYHG5RXWH0LOHVDQG3HUFHQWDJHVE\)XQFWLRQDO&ODVVDQG3&5 3 – 1 '&95RDG&RQGLWLRQ6XPPDU\ 3 – 3 4. PARK ROUTE LOCATION MAPS 5RXWH/RFDWLRQ.H\0DS 4 – 1 5RXWH/RFDWLRQ$UHD0DS 4 – 2 5RXWH&RQGLWLRQ.H\0DS±3&50LOHE\0LOH 4 – 12 5RXWH&RQGLWLRQ$UHD0DS±3&50LOHE\0LOH 4 – 13 5. PAVED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS &563DJHV 5 – 1 6. MANUALLY RATED PAVED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS 0553DJHV 6 – 1 7. PARKING AREA CONDITION RATING SHEETS 3DYHG3DUNLQJ$UHD3DJHV 7 – 1 8. ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES SUMMARIES '&95RXWH0DLQWHQDQFH)HDWXUHV6XPPDU\ 8 – 1 6WUXFWXUH/LVW 8 – 3 9. ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOGS 5RXWH0DLQWHQDQFH)HDWXUHV5RDG/RJV 9 – 1 10. APPENDIX ([SODQDWLRQRI&KDQJHVWRWKH5,3,QGH[(TXDWLRQVDQG'HWHUPLQDWLRQRI3&5 10 – 1 ([SODQDWLRQRIWKH([FHOOHQW*RRG)DLUDQG3RRU&RQGLWLRQ'HVFULSWLRQV 10 – 2 'HVFULSWLRQRI5DWLQJ6\VWHP 10 – 3 6XUIDFH'LVWUHVVHV 10 – 5 ,QGH[)RUPXODV 10 – 12 'DWD&ROOHFWLRQ9HKLFOH6XEV\VWHPV 10 – 16 *HRGDWDEDVH±%DFNJURXQGDQG0HWDGDWD 10 – 19 *ORVVDU\RI7HUPVDQG$EEUHYLDWLRQV 10 – 20 Section 1 Introduction Lake Mead National Recreation Area INTRODUCTION The Federal Highway Administration, (FHWA), in the mid 1970s, was charged with the task of identifying surface condition deficiencies and corrective priorities on National Park Service (NPS) roads and parkways.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub
    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving the Grand Canyon Watershed a Proposal for National Monument Designation
    Conserving the Grand Canyon Watershed A Proposal for National Monument Designation r! Photo: Marti&v& w, Kaibab Plateau, north rim of tlx Grand Canyon, Arizona 02010 GCWC WIL L1N COUNCIL W1DERNESS cnCtotr- Conserving the Grand Canyon Watershed A Proposal for National Monument Designation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A 12,000-year Human Record A Unique Landscape The proposed Monument holds lands of great signifi- Ranging from the arid Sonoran and Great Basin Des- cance to the Kaibab Paiute tribe, as well as Hopi, Zuni, erts to lush, boreal Rocky Mountain forests, the proposed Hualapi, Havasupai, and Navajo tribes, and was home Grand Canyon Watershed National Monument is an eco- to the Clovis, Basketmaker, and Puebloan peoples. More logical wonder. The proposed Monument embraces one than three thousand ancient Native American archaeo- of the most spectacular American landscapes— the Grand logical sites have been documented in the region, repre- Canyon— and encompasses a wild, rugged array of tower- senting just a fraction of the human history of the area. ing cliffs, deeply incised tributary canyons, grasslands, Ranging from settlements or habitations, to temporary and numerous springs that flow into the Colorado River camps, granaries and caches, and rock art, some of the in Grand Canyon. Unique geologic formations contribute sites date from as far back as the Paleo- Indian period— substantially to the proposed Monument' s spectacular 11, 000 BCE. biological diversity, with escarpments and canyons dating Kanab Creek falls within the traditional territory of back millions ofyears. At least twenty-two sensitive species call " Certain [ lanad] of theforest redereee dhoula the landscape home, including the endangered California condor and also be made predereed for the wigforest the rare northern goshawk.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Indicator Species of the Kaibab National Forest: an Evaluation of Population and Habitat Trends Version 3.0 2010
    Management Indicator Species of the Kaibab National Forest: an evaluation of population and habitat trends Version 3.0 2010 Isolated aspen stand. Photo by Heather McRae. Pygmy nuthatch. Photo by the Smithsonian Inst. Pumpkin Fire, Kaibab National Forest Mule deer. Photo by Bill Noble Red-naped sapsucker. Photo by the Smithsonian Inst. Northern Goshawk © Tom Munson Tree encroachment, Kaibab National Forest Prepared by: Valerie Stein Foster¹, Bill Noble², Kristin Bratland¹, and Roger Joos³ ¹Wildlife Biologist, Kaibab National Forest Supervisor’s Office ²Forest Biologist, Kaibab National Forest, Supervisor’s Office ³Wildlife Biologist, Kaibab National Forest, Williams Ranger District Table of Contents 1. MANAGEMENT INDICATOR SPECIES ................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4 Regulatory Background ...................................................................................................... 8 Management Indicator Species Population Estimates ...................................................... 10 SPECIES ACCOUNTS ................................................................................................ 18 Aquatic Macroinvertebrates ...................................................................................... 18 Cinnamon Teal .......................................................................................................... 21 Northern Goshawk ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow, Sediment Transport, and Nutrient Transport at Incline Village, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 1970-73
    Streamflow, Sediment Transport, and Nutrient Transport at Incline Village, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 1970-73 United States Geological Survey G/nnv Water-Supply Paper 2313 , Incline \ ..J"" Prepared in cooperation with the Nevada Division t INI )EVtLOPI D ^Rl A of Water Resources and Washoe County \ '' -^ \^ **\* I 1 / DFVHOPEU j ^/ ;AR£.V /f:V; 1 c LAKE TAHOE Coyer: Incline Village study area, Lake Tahoe, Nevada. Approximate drainage basin boundaries indicated by dashed, dotted lines. Solid triangles are principaj data collection sites; solid squares are supplemen­ tary data collection sites. Streamflow, Sediment Transport, and Nutrient Transport at Incline Village, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 1970-73 By PATRICK A. GLANCY Prepared in cooperation with the Nevada Division of Water Resources and Washoe County U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2313 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Glancy, Patrick A. Streamflow, sediment transport, and nutrient transport at Incline Village, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 1970-73. U.S. Geological Survey ; Water-supply paper 2313 Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.13:2313 1. Stream measurements Nevada Incline Village Region. 2. Sediment transport Nevada Incline Village Region. 3. Detritus Nevada Incline Village Region. I. Nevada. Division
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Survey: Scientists Find Variety of Species, Page 3
    Award winning! Bat survey: Scientists find variety of species, page 3 Winter 2014 Bi-state compact to preserve Tahoe STEPS TOWARD REVITALIZATION turns 45 years old Staff Report Redevelopment projects expected to aid environment, economy The partnership between California and Nevada that created the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency By Devin Middlebrook (TRPA) turned 45 years old in Tahoe Regional Planning Agency December 2014 and is approaching a half-century of progress in the protection and restoration of Lake Lake Tahoe’s communities have struggled Tahoe and its treasured environment. for decades from environmental, economic, and President Richard Nixon signed social pressures. The advent of Native American the bi-state compact to create the gaming throughout Northern California drove TRPA on Thursday, Dec. 18, 1969. massive casino job losses, which were compounded Nixon’s signature in the Oval Office followed the compact’s ratification by the recent recession. To many, a visible clue by Congress, approval by both was the number of run-down or vacant buildings states’ legislatures, and signatures of around the Lake. Many of these buildings were former governors Ronald Reagan in constructed in the 1960s, prior to the Tahoe Regional California and Paul Laxalt in Nevada. Planning Agency being established, during a period U.S. Sen. Alan Bible (D-Nev.) of rampant growth with a lack of development introduced legislation to approve the bi-state compact in Congress. Bible regulations. Fifty years later, as the recession took called Nixon’s signature of the bill hold, the Region looked tired and in disrepair. “the best news possible for those Times are changing.
    [Show full text]