Avramov Sofia PT Financing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Financing by International Finance Institutions – the Sofia case Metodi AVRAMOV Public Transport Company - Sofia Leipzig, 18 April 2008 SOFIA Area – 1 194 sq.км. Population – 1 400 000 inhabitants Number of public transport lines – 120 Length of the public transport network – 1 441 km Number of public transport vehicles – 834 Public transport services (2007) – 63 mil vehicle km Number of passengers in 2007 – 470 mil. Sofia PT scheme SOFIA PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN FIGURES Public transport Network Number Rolling services for Transport operator length in km of lines stock 2007 (in ´000 vehicle km) 1. Bus transport 977,85 77 424 34 249 2. Electrical transport 253,77 26 278 17 756 tram 153,37 16 177 11 069 trolley-bus 100,40 10 101 6 687 3. Metro 9,90 1 6 869 4. Private bus operators 200,15 16 126 10 233 TOTAL 1 441,67 120 834 63 107 Modal split Number of passengers in 2007 (in ´000) – 470 047. Metro Trolleybuses Buses 5.9% 12.7% 53.4% Trams 28% Sofia PT Revenues /2007/ general budgetary resources from the state 11% general budgetary commercial revenues resources from the from passenger fares municipality supplementary (ticket sale) 32% commercial revenues 50% 7% Major PT projects in Sofia financed by Finance Institutions /2002 – 2008/ • Sofia Metro Extension Project – financed by Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) • Sofia Public Transport Project - financed by European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) 1. Sofia Metro Extension Project. In 2002 was signed a loan agreement between Sofia municipality and JBIC. The Project aims to construct a 2.1km segment from the 7th to 9th station of the metro line No.1 Line (total length: 19.2km, of which 9.9 km is already in service). The segment runs through the central part of the city, which requires construction work using the shield tunneling method. The proceeds of the loan are using for procurement of equipment and services for construction work (including ancillary facilities such as the tunnel, rails, station buildings and traffic signals) as well as engineering and management consulting services. Parameters of the Loan: Borrower: Sofia Municipality Beneficiary: Sofia metro company Amount - 12 894 million JPY Interest Rate (% per annum) - 2.2% Repayment period – 30 years Grace period – 10 years 2. Sofia Public Transport Project. In April 2002, the City of Sofia signed a loan agreement with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to finance the Sofia Public Transport Project. The proceeds of the loan are for: - Rolling stock renewal (buses); - Refurbishment of trams. Parameters of the Loan: Borrower: Sofia Municipality Beneficiary: Municipal bus and tram companies Amount - 29,5 million EUR Interest Rate (% per annum) – Eero LIBOR +3,5% (From year 2007 = Euro LIBOR + 1%) Repayment period – 10 years Grace period – 3 years In addition to the Project, Sofia municipality received a 2.45 million EUR grant from the Netherlands for a new ticketing system. The grant is administrated by EBRD. Project realisation - 4 international tenders under the EBRD Procurement policies and rules: • In 2003 – purchase of 50 new articulated buses - Euro 3. The vehicles are in operation. • In 2005 – purchase of 61 new low floor solo buses - Euro 3. The vehicles are in operation. • In 2006 – 2 stage tender for supply and installation of a public transport ticketing system (trams and trolley-buses). The system will be in operation in July 2008. • In 2006 – 2 stage tender for refurbishment of 18 trams - AC motors. First refurbished tram was accepted for operation on 03 April 2008. 50 articulated buses Mercedes Benz O 345 G 61 low floor solo buses BMC 220 SLF Modernisation of existing Bulgarian trams 95 % new components; 4 AC motors; middle low floor section (16 %) Sofia PT ticketing system - Central system - 466 trams and trolleybuses - 1830 card validators - 466 onboard control units - 21 ticket offices Credit rating Credit ratings strongly influence the cost of financing. • Sofia municipality generates a quarter of Bulgaria's gross domestic product and attracts almost 60 per cent of foreign direct investments in Bulgaria. The unemployment rate in Sofia is at 2.4 % , more than three times lower compared to the average for the country (9%). • In March 2008 Standard & Poor's credit rating agency upgraded the credit rating of Sofia municipality from stable to positive. The agency affirmed the city's rating at BB+. • Due to the credit rating upgrade, the Sofia Municipality will decrease interest payments on loans. Financing by International Finance Institution (EBRD) – the Sofia case SWOT analysis STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES 1.EBRD differs from a commercial bank. 1.EBRD differs from a commercial bank. Better loan conditions (interests, financial securities, etc.) 2.Profit oriented or political oriented deceisions. 2. Local legislation 3.Who is taking the final decision – EBRD or Sofia Municipal There are restrictions according the Bulgarian local legislation Council? for loans taken by the municipality. There should be an open 4. Covenants under the loan agreement /one time or each year/ tender for selection of a financing Bank. However, this restriction does not apply for IFI. 3. The municipality signed new Public Service Contracts with the transport operators as an obligation according to the Loan agreement. (penalties / bonuses) 4. Almost no financial risk for the both parties. 5. Transparent procedure under EBRD’s Procurement Policies and Rules. OPPORTUNITIES THREATS 1.Strategy for using the results: 1. Limitations for co-financing the ticketing system - Restoring the production of trams in Sofia. project by Sofia municipality under Bulgarian Public - Building a capacity for refurbishment of trams by Sofia tram Procurement Act. factory. (exceeding the available budget) - Participation of the Sofia tram factory in international tenders 2. Taken of certain obligations under the Loan/Grant for production of new or refurbishment of old tram vehicles. agreement (loans, PT institutional framework, etc.). 2. Improvement of institutional framework (local level) 3. Gaining experience for development of EU projects. 4. Simplified procedures for additional financing. THANK YOU! [email protected] Public Transport Company - Sofia.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Republic of Bulgaria Ex-Post Evaluation of Japanese ODA

    1 Republic of Bulgaria Ex-Post Evaluation of Japanese ODA

    Republic of Bulgaria Ex-Post Evaluation of Japanese ODA Loan Project Sofia Metro Extension Project External Evaluator: Masami Tomita, Sanshu Engineering Consultant 0. Summary This project aimed at streamlining the city's transportation system by constructing tunnels and stations from the seventh to the ninth station, as part of Phase 2 (from the seventh to the sixteenth station of metro Line 1) of the Metro Line Construction Plan that existed at the time of project appraisal (covering approximately 19 km in total extension, from the first to the sixteenth station of metro Line 1) in Sofia, the capital of Bulgaria. Relevance of this project is high, as the project is consistent with priority areas of Bulgaria’s development plans and Japan’s ODA policy, and moreover development needs for the project are high. The actual figure of daily passenger ridership at two years after project completion is approximately 80% of the figure estimated during the Mid-Term Review, and other indicators such as the number of running trains, operation interval, annual operational revenue and net profit of Metropolitan Company, which is responsible for operation and maintenance (O&M) of metro, showed an improvement to a large extent, compared with those at the time of appraisal. According to the result of beneficiary survey, travelling time became shortened since beneficiaries started using metro Line 1 and traffic congestions on roads along Line 1 and air/traffic noise pollutions were reduced after project completion. Thus, effectiveness and impact of the project are high. Efficiency of the project is fair, as actual project period largely exceeded planned period, while actual project cost was within the planned cost.
  • Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan of Sofia Municipality Historical Urban Core Central Urban Area Inner City Peripheral City Surrounding Area

    Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan of Sofia Municipality Historical Urban Core Central Urban Area Inner City Peripheral City Surrounding Area

    INTRODUCTION 1 I NTRODUCTION The Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan 2019 – 2035 for Sofia Municipality has been elaborated under the project “Modernized trams for the City of Sofia” co-financed by Switzerland in the framework of the Swiss Contribution to the enlarged European Union and was adopted by the Sofia Municipal Council with Decision No.379 at Session No.78 dated 27th June 2019. http://swiss-contribution.bg/ 2 INTRODUCTION Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Spatial structure and demographic development of Sofia .............................................................. 15 1. Spatial structure .................................................................................................................. 15 2. Population ........................................................................................................................... 17 Analysis of the current situation ..................................................................................................... 19 Specialized survey .................................................................................................................. 20 1. Pedestrian traffic ................................................................................................................. 25 2. Bicycle traffic...................................................................................................................... 31 3. Public transport
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    DR. ELITZA STANOEVA European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Villa Salviati, Via Bolognese 156 50139 Florence, Italy [email protected] RESEARCH INTERESTS History of socialism in Central and Eastern Europe; Cold War history; Urban studies State bureaucracy and institutions under socialism; Command economy of socialism; East-West trade and economic cooperation in the Cold War; Socialist trade and consumption; Cold War tourism Urbanization change in Central and Eastern Europe in socialism and post-socialism; Monuments and visual propaganda of socialism; Socialist celebrations; Post-socialist politics of memory DEGREES PhD in History (magna cum laude) Technical University, Berlin (July 2013) dissertation: Sofia: The Socialist City in Its Monumental Vision and Practice advisor: Prof. Dorothee Brantz; readers: Prof. Heinz Reif and Prof. Ivaylo Ditchev MA in Central European History Central European University, Budapest (June 2004) thesis: The Building of a Nation-State Capital: Unity, Division and Interaction in Urban Space – Sofia (1879-1934) advisor: Prof. Judit Bodnar; readers: Prof. Peter Johanek and Prof. Hanna Schissler MA in Philosophy Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” (Feb 2003) thesis: Physiognomy of Culture: From Speculative Philosophy of History to Modern History of Culture [in Bulgarian] advisor: Prof. Raicho Pozharliev; reader: Prof. Dimitar Denkov ACADEMIC POSITIONS Jan 2017 - Dec 2018 Research Associate, European University Institute (Florence), Department of History and Civilization Feb
  • '14 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, Niš

    '14 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, Niš

    The XVI Conference RAILCON ‘14 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, Niš, Serbia (GPS: 43°19'49.7"N+21°53'42.6"E) RAILCON ‘14 RAILCON ‘14 The Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Niš, Serbia wishes you a Program Committee pleasant welcome to the Prof. Dušan Stamenković, Presid., Fac.of Mech.Eng. Niš, SRB INTERNATIONAL XVI SCIENTIFIC-EXPERT Prof. Boban Anđelković, Fac.of Mech.Eng. Niš, SRB CONFERENCE ON RAILWAYS - RAILCON '14. Prof. Dobrinka Atmadžova, VTU T. Kableškov Sofia, BG Prof. Branislav Bošković, Fac. of Traffic Eng. Belgrade, SRB The Conference on Railways continues the tradition and this year Prof. Dragan Đurđanović, Uni Texas, USA it is its sixteenth anniversary. Its mission is to bring together Prof. Miroslav Đurđanović, Fac.of Mech.Eng. Niš, SRB scientists and experts from the region, to observe the ongoing Prof. Ratko Đuričić, Fac. of Traffic Eng. Doboj, R. Srpska changes in developed railways and suggest directions for further Prof. Eberhard Hohnecker, KIT Karlsruhe, GER railway development in Serbia and the region. Prof. Daniel Kalinčak, Uni Žilina, SK According to this year’s Conference Program there are 74 papers Prof. Dragutin Kostić, Fac. of Traffic Eng. Belgrade, SRB written by 153 authors from Railway, University and Industry, Prof. Stjepan Lakušić, Faculty of Civil Eng. Zagreb, HR from 10 countries, dealing with actual topics from fields of Prof. Vojkan Lučanin, Fac.of Mech.Eng. Belgrade, SRB rolling stock, traffic, infrastructure, maintenance, informatics, Prof. Dragomir Mandić, Fac. of Traffic Eng. Belgrade, SRB economics, strategy, policy and other aspects related to Railway. Prof. Dragan Marinković, TU Berlin, GER Prof.
  • Ex-Post Project Evaluation 2013: Package Ii-6 (Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania)

    Ex-Post Project Evaluation 2013: Package Ii-6 (Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania)

    EX-POST PROJECT EVALUATION 2013: PACKAGE II-6 (TURKEY, BULGARIA, ROMANIA) JULY 2014 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY SANSHU ENGINEERING CONSULTANT EV JR 14-33 Preface Ex-post evaluation of ODA projects has been in place since 1975 and since then the coverage of evaluation has expanded. Japan’s ODA charter revised in 2003 shows Japan’s commitment to ODA evaluation, clearly stating under the section “Enhancement of Evaluation” that in order to measure, analyze and objectively evaluate the outcome of ODA, third-party evaluations conducted by experts will be enhanced. This volume shows the results of the ex-post evaluation of ODA Loan projects that were mainly completed in fiscal year 2011, and Technical Cooperation projects and Grant Aid projects, most of which project cost exceeds 1 billion JPY, that were mainly completed in fiscal year 2010. The ex-post evaluation was entrusted to external evaluators to ensure objective analysis of the projects’ effects and to draw lessons and recommendations to be utilized in similar projects. The lessons and recommendations drawn from these evaluations will be shared with JICA’s stakeholders in order to improve the quality of ODA projects. Lastly, deep appreciation is given to those who have cooperated and supported the creation of this volume of evaluations. July 2014 Toshitsugu Uesawa Vice President Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Disclaimer This volume of evaluations, the English translation of the original Japanese version, shows the result of objective ex-post evaluations made by external evaluators. The views and recommendations herein do not necessarily reflect the official views and opinions of JICA.
  • Master Plan of Sofia Municipality

    Master Plan of Sofia Municipality

    MASTER PLAN OF SOFIA MUNICIPALITY APPROVED BY SOFIA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, DECISION N:697 PROTOCOL 51/19.11.2009 AND THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, DECISION N:960/12.2009 SOFIA MUNICIPALITY ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING DIRECTORATE MUNICIPAL ENTERPRISE SYNTHESIS REPORT “SOFPROECT - MASTER PLAN” SOFIA, 2009 SOFIA MUNICIPALITY ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING DIRECTORATE MUNICIPAL ENTERPRISE “SOFPROECT - MASTER PLAN” MASTER PLAN OF SOFIA MUNICIPALITY SYNTHESIS REPORT CHIEF MASTER PLAN COORDINATOR LYUDMIL MIHAYLOVICH DIRECTOR “SOFPROECT - MASTER PLAN” ENG. PETAR TERZIEV CHIEF ARCHITECT OF SOFIA ARCH. PETAR DIKOV SOFIA, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background information 4.4.1. Spatial planning structure 1.0.1. Introductory notes 4.4.2. The system of centres 1.2. Historical overview of the spatial development 4.4.3. Territorial organization of the Tertiary sector 1.3. Geographical location 4.5. Green system 1.4. Natural conditions and resources 4.5.1. General stipulations 2. Analysis of the current state and development trends of the economy of Sofia Municipality 4.5.2. Analysis of the amendments by elements of the Green system 2.1. Economic development factors 4.5.3. Comparative analysis and conclusions from the balance of the territory 2.2. General characteristics of the territorial economic complex 4.6. System “Recreation” 2.3. Primary sector 4.6.1. Prerequisites for analyses and assessments related to amendments in the 2.3.1. Agriculture System “Recreation” of the Master Plan of Sofia Municipality 2.3.2. Forestry 4.6.2. Changes and trends in the functional system “Recreation” 2.4. Secondary sector 4.6.3.