Jopp Peer-Book.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jopp Peer-Book.Pdf PEER PRODUCTION ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: SPECIAL FSCONS EDITION SOCIALLY USEFUL PRODUCTION THE CUNNING OF INSTRUMENTAL REASON AUTHORITY IN PEER PRODUCTION BECOMING MAKERS HACKLABS AND HACKERSPACES BOOK OF PEER PRODUCTION EditorS Johan SödErbErg & MaXigaS Special edition of Journal of Peer Production – peerproduction.net In collaboration with Free Society Conference and Nordic Summit – fscons.org INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 2 TECHNOLOGY NETWORKS FOR SOCIALLY USEFUL PRODUCTION ...................... 4 THE CUNNING OF INSTRUMENTAL REASON ................................................... 12 AUTHORITY IN PEER PRODUCTION ................................................................ 23 BECOMING MAKERS .................................................................................... 36 HACKLABS AND HACKERSPACES .................................................................. 46 Publisher: NSU Press Cofinancer: LETStudio Graphic design: Karin Sjöberg All the content in this book is in the public domain ISBN 978-87-87564-83-0 Distributor: Aarhus Universitetsförlag A/S Langelandsgade 177 80 Aarhus N Denmark 2014 Göteborg, Sverige INTRODUCTION TO BOOK OF PEER PRODUCTION Johan SödErbErg & MathiEu o'nEil The Book of Peer Production is an off-spring of the Journal of counter-offensive. Under the current circumstances, its ideas Peer Production, an open access, peer reviewed journal dedi- and tactics are a roadplan for continued failures. Second, it is cated to investigating the emergence of peer production as clarifying to compare leading critical intellectuals of the early a new mode of production. Characteristic of peer production 20th century with their contemporary counterparts. Rosa is that the output is orientated towards the further expan- Luxemburg, Trotski, Lenin, Lukàcs, Korsch and Gramsci com- sion of the commons; while the commons, recursively, is the bined incisive political analysis with the leadership of political chief resource in this mode of production. In fact, the com- organisations. There are still a handful of intellectuals closely mons and peer production are two names for describing the associated with far-left micro-parties; in present-day Europe same thing: a particular kind of labour relation. This labour we have the late Daniel Bensaïd in France and Alex Callinicos relation is predicated on voluntary participation and the self- in the United Kingdom; in Latin America, one may think of selection of tasks. Participants may be driven by a variety of Álvaro García Linera, vice-president of Bolivia since 2006, and motivations, for instance, self-fulfilment, peer recognition, of Subcomandante Marcos of the Mexican Zapatista Army of developing new skills, or something else again. We may call National Liberation (Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional such motivations intrinsic. The high degree of intrinsic moti- or EZLN). But the overwhelming majority of present-day intel- vation in commons-based peer production is proportionate lectuals with a critical bent (the writers of this introduction to a relatively low degree of extrinsic motivation. That is to included), are state employees in the service of the university say, monetary compensation for labour expenditure. This is system. From this observation Keucheyan concludes: testified in the willingness among participants to relinquish exclusive proprietary rights over the results of their labour in this does not mean that contemporary critical intellec- favour of public ownership licenses. Starting from this ideal tuals are not engaged, or that they are less radical than type, we set out to scrutinise the inconsistencies and contra- classical marxists. but, aside from their engagement, dictions of peer production, placing emphasis on its hybrid they are academics, which cannot fail to influence the co-existence with dominant forms of (wage) labour and prop- kind of theories they produce.2 erty relations. A key area of investigation are cases where the output of the community is appropriated by a private rights The claims about an ascendant mode of peer production holder. Commons-based peer production is thus turned into seems to point in the opposite direction. As a counterpoint to a model for exploiting free labour.1 We invite contributions the academisation of debates and politics, alternative forums from as many perspectives as possible in this discussion. The and meeting places flourish where practitioners and activists overriding goal is to conceptualise what peer production is reflect over their practice and its wider, societal implications. and could become, as a step towards building a more just and No-one personifies this stance better than Richard Stallman. sustainable future. His ideals of autonomy, creativity, sharing, and cooperation have been advanced through the creation of GNU software, In keeping with the topic of the journal and the book, we the General Public Licence (or “copyleft”) and the Free seek to position ourselves in-between the grassroots initia- Software Foundation. Those achievements have been cou- tives and discussions taking place on the Internet, driven by pled with an independent production of ideas, manifestos, practitioners and activists of various kinds, and the theory forecasts and strategic plans. Recall the promise for the future and critiques coming out of academia. We are thus obliged that concludes the GNU Manifesto: to say some words about the match, and mismatch, be- tween the concept of peer production and the academic in the long run, making programs free is a step toward the world. This leads on to a much larger and thorny question: post-scarcity world, where nobody will have to work very the state of the contemporary intellectual landscape. This hard just to make a living. People will be free to devote has been brilliantly mapped by a French sociologist, Razmig themselves to activities that are fun, such as program- Keucheyan, in his book Hémisphère gauche. Une cartographie ming, after spending the necessary ten hours a week des nouvelles pensées critiques. Leaning on Perry Anderson's on required tasks such as legislation, family counseling, diagnosis, Keucheyan makes two key points: first, it must be robot repair and asteroid prospecting. there will be no recognised that the New Left was defeated by the neo-liberal need to be able to make a living from programming.3 2 Keucheyan, R. (2010) Hémisphère gauche. Une cartographie des nouvelles 1 For a more on peer production, see: Vasilis Kostakis and Michel Bauwens pensées critiques. Paris: La Découverte. (2014) Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. London: Palgrave. On the risk of exploitation of free labour, see: (ed.) Trebor 3 Stallman, R. (1985) The GNU Manifesto. Available: http://www.gnu.org/gnu/ Scholz (2012) The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge. manifesto.html/ 2 Trained social scientists are bound to react with a wry smile proponents of the Peer-to-Peer Foundation share many of the when reading the references to asteroids and robots. Most same concerns and analysis without being as closely tied to likely, they will proceed to formulate a critique of the logocen- the Marxist tradition. The initiative to start the Journal of Peer tric, techno-deterministic, Western and/or patriarchal hacker Production came out of discussions at the Fourth Oekonux culture.4 We invite such critiques as part of our collective conference in Manchester in 2009; our ambition was to create undertaking to reflect over peer production. Having said that, a forum that accommodates these different perspectives. a critique is not complete unless the critic includes himself/ herself in his/her analysis. As we saw, the position of the critic It is fitting that the book has been produced in connection with largely overlaps with that of the professional academic. One the Free Society Conference and Nordic Summit (FSCONS). bias of this profession is a generalised anxiety not to be per- Since its beginning in 2007, FSCONS has been a rallying point ceived as naive, against which the critical stance serves as an for everyone interested in bottom-up technology develop- antidote. What is problematic here is that this attitude accords ment and its wider, societal implications. Equally fitting is it to so well with the ironic, post-ideological hegemonic order of have the book published on Nordic Summer University Press, the day. In contrast, the convictions expressed by Richard a forum for independent thinking and self-organisation for Stallman and like-minded people have been rewarded with more than 60 years. The same aspiration is expressed by the striking successes on the ground. The creation of peer produc- authors of this volume. In the opening chapter, Adrian Smith tion projects such as Project Gutenberg, Wikipedia and the documents the story about The Lucas Plan. When workers in many offshoots of GNU/Linux are some cases in point. Those the U.K. arms industry faced layoffs in 1970s, they proposed accomplishments stand out all the more as the traditional left to take over the factory and repurpose it for 'socially useful is struggling to come up with an adequate response to the production.' In the next chapter, Johan Söderberg investigates mounting crisis of the capitalist system. Post-1989, the space an open source 3D printing project that set out to
Recommended publications
  • Impact of the Maker Movement
    Impact of the maker movement Developed by Deloitte Center for the Edge and Maker Media from the Maker Impact Summit Dec. 2013 I AM A MAKER with my own two hands I forge the future from my imagining my work, my sweat with these tools i can build worlds here i put wire and foam transistor and plastic rubber metal and wood together to make something new what does it do where will this take us new places new worlds all from my workshop Malcolm S. Hoover, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS A Future of Potential 4 Overview 7 Letters from Conveners 10 How to Read This Document 14 How might the Maker Movement have an impact on… 15 • Manufacturing 16 • Education 19 • Government and Public Policy 22 • Citizen Science 25 • Retail 28 What Happens Next? 30 Participants 32 Other Images from the Summit 38 A FUTURE OF POTENTIAL We are on the cusp of an opportunity to more fully We are in a correction of sorts. Driven by the goal of scale tap into our creative potential, driven by significant efficiencies and low costs, the supply chain has been technological innovation that is democratizing the means stretched to the far extremes, like a bungee cord, and now of production and enabling connections between resources it’s starting to come back as the underlying economics and markets. Realizing this opportunity will require change. Where will we end up? We’ve learned in the last re-thinking and redesigning all of our major institutions, 15 years that experimentation is the key to innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Verksamhetsberättelse 2008
    ANNUAL REPORT 2008 Photo: Johan Schiff, CC-BY-SA-3.0 Photo: Fluff, CC-BY-SA-3.0 Photo: David Castor, Public domain Introduction Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, is one of the world's ten most visited websites. The site is run by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit foundation, which also operates several other free sites. Wikimedia Sverige is a local chapter of Wikimedia Foundation. The objective of the Wikimedia Sverige, a non-profit organization, is to make knowledge freely available to all people, especially by supporting the Wikimedia Foundation projects. Wikimedia Sverige was founded on October 20, 2007 so 2008 is the first complete year of operation of the association. During the year, the number of members doubled and the assets have increased by a factor of twenty. The board has during the year participated in four major events, held 12 lectures for different groups, participated in 21 local meetups and have had 19 Board meetings and an annual meeting. During the year we have also developed marketing materials, created a book on birds from material from Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, and provided support for Lennart Guldbrandssons popular book "This is how Wikipedia works". Internationally, the board participated in several events and developed personal contacts with other local chapters of the Wikimedia Foundation. In a short time we have been recognized as an active and effective organization. We feel a very positive feedback from various groups in the Swedish society and can with pleasure notice that Wikipedia has become increasingly more reliable and accepted for use in schools and by media.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Wonderful World of Wort
    05_230626 ch01.qxp 2/22/08 12:14 AM Page 11 Chapter 1 Welcome to the Wonderful World of Wort In This Chapter ᮣ Why brew at home? ᮣ Do I have what it takes? ne vexing question for the homebrewer wannabe is “why go through the Otrouble of brewing beer at home when I can just buy it at the local store?” Well, for starters, brewing beer at home is no trouble if you enjoy what you’re doing, and with the help of this book, you can certainly enjoy homebrewing. Secondly, homebrewed beer can be every bit as good as — if not better than — a lot of commercial beer, with more flavor and character than most. In fact, avoiding mass-market beer was the original inspiration for homebrewing. Thirdly, homebrewing is a hobby that pays many dividends, from having your own house brand of beer to hanging colorful award ribbons on your wall to earning the undying admiration of your beer-drinking buddies. (Warning: Admiration can be addictive.) In this chapter, I give you an overview of the topics covered in detail in the rest of the book as well as a bit of the history of homebrewing and its recent surge in popularity. COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Homebrewers Abound! Becoming a homebrewer means you’re in good company. According to the American Homebrewers Association (AHA) in Boulder, Colorado, an estimated 1 million homebrewers are brewing in the United States. That’s a lot of brewers. And the hobby continues to expand every year. Recent estimates indicate that over 1,000 homebrew supply retailers and several hundred homebrewing clubs have popped up in response to homebrewing’s growing popularity.
    [Show full text]
  • Make Your Best…
    | MAKE YOUR BEST | HOMEBREWING MAKE IT Grantham Make English Mild If ever you buy specialty malts specifically for Your Best… a batch, let it be for this one. Fresh crystal and Going beyond the simple question of “what” and instead chocolate malts really make it sing, and at exploring the “why” will help you understand how to such a light ABV, you’ll be able to enjoy all of design and brew better beers. By Josh Weikert that flavor by the dimpled mug full. English Mild ALL-GRAIN Batch size: 5 gallons (19 liters) Brewhouse efficiency: 72% Like chefs who demonstrate their skills by cooking an egg, many OG: 1.040 brewers consider mild to be a real test. It should be light but malt- FG: 1.010 forward, impactful but not overbearing, rich but not heavy, and low IBUs: 15 enough in ABV to drink by the pint. ABV: 3.9% Style: I once heard someone describe mild as being “like a bitter, but dark.” Wrong. Although the two styles share a country of origin, En- MALT/GRAIN BILL glish mild and bitter are not that similar. Dark mild is a light beer, but 6 lb (2.7 kg) Maris Otter not in color or flavor. It should be easy to drink and low in alcohol. Go 8 oz (227 g) amber malt easy on bitterness, using just enough to balance the malt flavors, which 8 oz (227 g) brown malt should do most of the work for you. The style allows for a wide range of 8 oz (227 g) chocolate rye malt malt expressions; the key is selecting malts that reinforce and comple- ment each other, adding complexity without making the beer too bulky.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Valley Homebrewers Association • April 2012TAP • Vol
    Ohio Valley Homebrewers Association www.ovha.net • April 2012TAP • Vol. 16, No. 4 2012 “Off” Flavors In Beer Upcoming Events Their Causes & How To Avoid Them APRIL This year the club is shifting focus away from our normal “beer style of the month” and Wed, Apr 25, 7 pm: will instead concentrate on working out the bugs of your brewing process. Meeting, Germania Part of this project will involve learning to identify a defect in your beer and the causes Mannerchor, Topic: and corrections to fix it. In order to accomplish this we’ve ordered the SIEBEL Institute Brewing Software Choices of Technology Sensory Training Kit. by Art Cox; Beer Off- Flavor: Butyric This kit works like the one we had a few years ago—for those that remember it. You take a fairly neutral beer and you spike it with a flavoring vial from the kit. The flavorings MAY simulate the off-flavor you are trying to replicate. You keep a second glass of clean beer Sat, May 5: AHA’s Big as your control to help compare and contrast. Science at work! Brew Day at SWIRCA during BBQ Fest. (Don Heisler) Butyric acid Sat, May 19: Upland TASTES/SMELLS LIKE: Vomit. UpCup Homebrew Comp and AHA Rally @ POSSIBLE CAUSES: Likely to have arisen from an excessively long mash at relatively low tem- Bloomington peratures allowing Clostridium bacteria to grow in the mash. Wed, May 30, 7 pm: HOW TO AVOID: Double check your mash thermometer for accuracy and recalibrate if Meeting; Germania needed. Use proper mashing technique. Avoid distractions (spouse, etc.) while brewing.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Society in Crisis and in Motion: Building the Material Bases for an Alternative Society from the Bottom up Georgia Bekridaki and Antonios Broumas
    Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 9 (1): 230 – 255 (2017) Bekridaki and Broumas, Greek society in crisis Greek society in crisis and in motion: building the material bases for an alternative society from the bottom up Georgia Bekridaki and Antonios Broumas Abstract In the last six years, Greece has been hit by a vicious circle of relentless neoliberal restructuring programs. During the years of the crisis, throughout the country urban and rural communities of struggle have been formed, which tend to employ instituent practices and to acquire constitutive characteristics, in order to collectively address unmet social needs / desires and ensure their collective survival. In this context, socially reproductive commons in germ form have emerged with social and solidarity economy initiatives in their peripheries, alternative forms of life in common have been shaped and societies have been set in motion with the potential to establish the material foundations of their collective autonomy. Within this huge gap of social (re)production, the constituent power of social movements emerges in germ form as a resurgent force with the potential to address these needs and desires and, correspondingly, shape life in common. In the neoliberal era, it is this potential of a constituent counter - power that has the capacity to constitute the contending power to the dominant force of the capital - state complex. Keywords: Greece, social movements, mutual aid, commons, social and solidarity economy, constituent power. Introduction Greece is at the forefront of a social war raging throughout the south and, gradually spreading towards the north of Europe. On the one side, capital loots wealth and accumulates social power from vulnerable populations directly by dispossession of small property, public wealth and the commons and less by the traditional means of extracting value through exploitation (Harvey 2014: 65).
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Beer Issue Summer
    VOL.3 JUNE 2011 — ISSUE6 Summer beer issue Also inside: LOUDFEST 4 recap—8-Bit Burgers Checks Out Stover Bros.—Brazos County Metal News—Concert Calendar—A Veritable Cornucopia of Book/Movie/CD Reviews 979 Represent 2 Why LOUDFEST Is So Awesome Every year after LOUDFEST I am reminded why so many bands love to come and rock out in downtown Bryan for all of youse. It is because so many of you show up and go absolutely apeshit over these incredible young bands. Bands that play LOUDFEST can‘t wait to come back over here because they have heard for many years how useless it is to book shows in College Station. They had no idea about downtown Bryan. Rola at Revolution Café & Bar and Eric at The Stafford have filled a rather large void. Down- town Bryan picks up that slack. So many of the older people who came out to their first LOUDFEST last month 979Represent is a local magazine had no idea that any live local music goes on around here, let alone ANYTHING at all in downtown Bryan. for the discerning dirtbag. They assumed it was Northgate or nothing. So many bands have heard the horror stories from other bands about getting dicked over on money, parking and promotion by the few Northgate clubs that still book bands that they see Aggieland as a market to avoid. LOUDFEST is helping to change that attitude. Editorial bored LOUDFEST is booked every year out of a sense of brotherhood. We book bands we like and want to see.
    [Show full text]
  • Review/Of/The/Research/ Literature
    Working/Paper/Series// SWPS/2014)08/ May,%2014% Community)based/digital/fabrica5on/ workshops:/A/review/of/the/research/ literature// Sabine/Hielscher// and/Adrian/Smith/ SPRU.Working.Paper.Series/ The/SPRU/Working/Paper/Series/aims/to/accelerate/the/public/availability/of/the/research/undertaken/ by/ SPRU)associated/ people/ of/ all/ categories,/ and/ excep5onally,/ other/ research/ that/ is/ of/ considerable/interest/within/SPRU./It/presents/research/results/that/in/whole/or/part/are/suitable/for/ submission/to/a/refereed/journal,/to/a/sponsor,/to/a/major/conference/or/to/the/editor/of/a/book./Our/ inten5on/is/to/provide/access/to/early/copies/of/SPRU/research./ Editors( Contact( Tommaso&Ciarli& [email protected]/ Daniele&Rotolo& [email protected]/ Associate(Editors& Area& Florian&Kern& Energy& [email protected]/ Paul&Nightingale&& Science,&&&Technology&Policy& [email protected]/ Matias&Ramirez& Development& [email protected]/ Joe&Tidd&&& Technology&Innovation&Management& [email protected]/ Carlos&Sato& [email protected]/ Maria&Savona&&& Economics&of&Technological&Change& [email protected]/ Mariana&Mazzucato& [email protected]/ Andrew&Stirling& Transitions& [email protected]/ Caitriona&McLeish& Civil&military&interface&& [email protected]/ Administrator( Jenny&Lieu& [email protected]/ Disclaimer/ The/works/available/here/are/the/responsibility/of/the/individual/author(s)/and/do/not/necessarily/ represent/the/views/of/other/SPRU/researchers./As/maLers/of/policy/and/prac5ce,/SPRU/does/not/
    [Show full text]
  • Hackerspaces
    d WP4 | CASE STUDY Report: Hackerspaces Theme [ssh.2013.3.2-1][Social Innovation- Empowering People, changing societies] Project Full Title: “Transformative Social Innovation Theory project” Grant Agreement n. 613169 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613169 Suggested citation: Sabine Hielscher, Adrian Smith, Mariano Fressoli (2015) WP4 Case Study Report: Hackerspaces, Report For the TRANSIT FP7 Project, SPRU, University oF Sussex, Brighton. Acknowledgements: We wish to thank everyone in the Hackerspace scene who helped us with our research, whether through interviews, welcoming us to Hackerspaces and events, or putting us in touch with others. We also thank our colleagues in the TRANSIT project, at SPRU, at UNQ and Fundación Cenit For their help and encouragement with the research. Finally, we thank the European Commission and their FP7 research programme For Funding the TRANSIT project. Date: 14 January 2015 Authors: Sabine Hielscher, Adrian Smith, Mariano Fressoli Contact person: Adrian Smith Table of contents 1 Introduction to Hackerspaces 2 Methodology 2.1 Researcher relations to the case 2.2 Methods 3 Analysis of transnational network(ing) 3.1 Transnational networking: Hackerspaces 3.2 Aspects of ‘innovation’ and ‘change’ of the transnational network(ing) 3.3 Aspects of empowerment and disempowerment of the transnational network(ing) 3.4 Other issues about the transnational networking 4 Local initiative
    [Show full text]
  • Open Design Platforms for Open Source Product
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, ICED15 27-30 JULY 2015, POLITECNICO DI MILANO, ITALY OPEN DESIGN PLATFORMS FOR OPEN SOURCE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: CURRENT STATE AND REQUIREMENTS Bonvoisin, Jérémy (1); Boujut, Jean-François (2) 1: Technische Universität Berlin, Germany; 2: University Grenoble Alpes, France Abstract The spread of ICT and cheap low-size production tools like 3D-printers led to the development of open design, i.e. community-based and open source development of physical products. This innovative organization of product development offers a great opportunity for continuous improvement of products as well as formidable a potential for product innovation and incubation of new businesses. However, because of a limited availability of supporting methods and tools, open design projects are still unable to compete with today’s standards of industrial product design. The present article aims at providing a state of the art of existing online tools for open source product development and discusses their limitation regarding the challenges raised by what is identified as an emerging design paradigm. This is performed through the definition of an analysis grid through which existing tools have been scanned as well as a case study. It claims for further empirical research in order to describe the phenomenon from a design science perspective, to define appropriate categories and develop new specific online product data management tools. Keywords: Open Source Design, Information management, Design methodology Contact: Dr. Jérémy Bonvoisin TU Berlin Institute for Machine-tools and Factory Planning - Department Industrial Information Technology Germany [email protected] Please cite this paper as: Surnames, Initials: Title of paper.
    [Show full text]
  • A Topological Space for Design, Participation and Production. Tracking Spaces of Transformation
    The Journal of Peer Production New perspectives on the implications of peer production for social change Journal of Peer Production Issue 13: OPEN http://peerproduction.net — ISSN 2213-5316 A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE FOR DESIGN, PARTICIPATION AND PRODUCTION. TRACKING SPACES OF TRANSFORMATION Sandra Álvaro Sánchez ‘Space of transformation’ is a concept borrowed from Serres’ communication theory and here redefined after the evolution of the post-digital milieu and the materialistic critique of the same. Hackerspaces, fablabs, medialabs and other shared machines shops are defined here as spaces of transformation, places for the encounter between humans and non-humans, where disciplines are bridged together, hitherto severed, giving place to collective practices related to education, production and society. Shared machine shops are sited locally but also connected globally. Online, they share innovative forms of production, education and collective organization, giving place to a complex ecosystem. This article presents an analysis of the topology of this ecosystem conducted by means of tracking and visualizing the online interactions between the hackerspaces listed at the platform Hackerspaces.org. The application of network analysis is aimed to answer the research questions: First, how shared machine shops are locally and globally connected? Second, what links hackerspaces among them and these with new social issues? The concept of shared machine shops as spaces of transformation and the study of their mutual relations allows for an understanding of the transformative capacity of these spaces and how they are producing a new space for social innovation through its mutual interchange of information. Keywords: hackerspaces, network analysis, design, social innovation, space of transformation development of new organizational forms related to By Sandra Álvaro Sánchez peer-production, and the prototyping of new material products, linked to entrepreneurship and Download as PDF innovation, as well as, of new educational projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Printing at the Florida Public Library
    Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 1 • What is 3D “printing” • A bit of HISTORY • Types of 3D printing technology • Really Interesting 3D printing Applications! • Bringing it Home Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 2 • “A process for making a physical object from a three-dimensional digital model, typically by laying down successive thin layers of a material”. • 3D Printing is also referred to as- “ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING” Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 3 A “Three-Dimensional Digital Model” (Paper ‘n Pencil holder designed by students in recent FPL class) Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 4 Finished product printed with the library’s 3D printer Student Product Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 5 • Invented in 1983, 3D printing is not all that new • Chuck Hull, recognized as the “inventor” of 3D printing, filed for a patent August 8, 1986 • Hull coined the phrase “Stereo Lithography” for the technology used in his 3D printer when applying for the patent (granted March 11, 1986) • Let’s watch a brief CNN interview with Chuck Hull Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 6 • The year 2005 is a notable point in the history of 3D printing. This marks the start of the RepRap Project by Dr. Adrian Bowyer at Bath University in England • RepRap is short for replicating rapid prototyper. RepRaps are 3D printers with the additional ability to produce most of the parts necessary to assemble another identical printer. Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 7 “Darwin” The First RepRap Printer Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 8 • With the history lesson covered, let’s look at 3D Printing in the 21st century • What Technology is used to print 3D? • How do you actually make a 3D printed object? Prepared by-Robert Persing April 2017 9 Concrete Type Technologies Materials Thermoplastics (e.g.
    [Show full text]