DOCSLIB.ORG

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT Number 16 April, 1995 Huron River Assessment E. M. Hay-Chmielewski Paul W. Seelbach Gary E. Whelan Douglas B. Jester Jr. Big Lake (1,018 ft) Huron River Watershed Elevation Distance Distance Lake Erie (572 ft) STATE OF MICHIGAN DNR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report No. 16 April, 1995 HURON RIVER ASSESSMENT E. M. Hay-Chmielewski Paul W. Seelbach Gary E. Whelan Douglas B. Jester Jr. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources, (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and for access to Michigan’s natural resources. State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, disability, age, marital status, height and weight. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, please write the MDNR Equal Opportunity Office, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909, or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, 1200 6th Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226, or the Office of Human Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. 20204. For more information about this publication or the American Disabilities Act (ADA), contact, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. COVER: A three dimensional drawing of the area containing the Huron River watershed. It shows how the water flows from the headwaters down the landscape, gathering the contributions from the tributaries, to Lake Erie. The figure is an adaptation of a drawing provided by the Huron River Watershed Council, Ann Arbor. The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them. Albert Einstein 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Figures....................................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary............................................................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 13 RIVER ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................................... 16 Geography.............................................................................................................................. 16 History 16 Biological Communities ........................................................................................................ 18 Original Fish Communities...................................................................................... 18 Factors Affecting Fish Communities....................................................................... 20 Present Fish Communities ....................................................................................... 22 Aquatic Invertebrates (except mussels)................................................................... 23 Mussels 23 Amphibians and Reptiles ......................................................................................... 24 Mammals .................................................................................................................. 25 Birds 25 Other Natural Features of Concern.......................................................................... 25 Pest Species .............................................................................................................. 25 Geology and Hydrology ........................................................................................................ 26 Geology .................................................................................................................... 26 Climate 27 Annual stream flows................................................................................................. 27 Seasonal flow stability ............................................................................................. 28 Daily flow stability................................................................................................... 29 Channel Morphology ............................................................................................................. 30 Channel gradient....................................................................................................... 30 Channel cross sections ............................................................................................. 32 Soils and Land Use Patterns .................................................................................................. 36 Special Jurisdictions............................................................................................................... 38 Navigability .............................................................................................................. 38 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission................................................................. 38 County Drain Commissioners.................................................................................. 39 Natural River Designations..................................................................................... 39 State and Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority Parklands .................................. 40 Recreational Use .................................................................................................................... 40 Dams and Barriers.................................................................................................................. 42 Water Quality......................................................................................................................... 46 Fishery Management.............................................................................................................. 48 Citizen Involvement............................................................................................................... 50 3 MANAGEMENT OPTIONS.............................................................................................................. 52 Biological Communities ........................................................................................................ 52 Geology and Hydrology ....................................................................................................... 53 Channel Morphology ............................................................................................................ 54 Soils and Land Use Patterns .................................................................................................. 55 Special Jurisdictions............................................................................................................... 55 Recreational Use ................................................................................................................... 56 Dams and Barriers.................................................................................................................. 57 Water Quality......................................................................................................................... 57 Fishery Management.............................................................................................................. 58 Citizen Involvement............................................................................................................... 59 PUBLIC COMMENT AND RESPONSE.......................................................................................... 60 GLOSSARY ........................................................................................................................................ 64 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................... 67 4 List of Tables Table 1. Huron River gradient (ft/mi) from the headwaters to the mouth of the river (Fisheries Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, unpublished data). Table 2. Archaeological sites in the Huron River watershed, listed by township. Table 3. List of common and scientific names of species referred to in text. Table 4. Non-indigenous fish species in the Huron River (Fisheries Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, unpublished data). Table 5. Fish stocking in the Huron River watershed, 1981-1991 (Fisheries Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources). Table 6. List of fishes in the Huron River watershed. Table 7. Increases (++) or decreases (d) in range between 1938 and 1977 of vegetation-dependent species (those fish that require vegetation at some point in their life history) on the mainstem of the Huron River and three major tributaries. Table 8. Increases (++) or decreases (d) in range between 1938 and 1977 of gravel-dependent species (those fish that require gravel at some point in their life history) on the mainstem of the Huron River and three major tributaries. Table 9. Increases (++) or decreases (d) in range between 1938 and 1977 of silt-dependent species (those fish that require silt at some point in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Huron River History Book
    THE HURON RIVER Robert Wittersheim Over 15,000 years ago, the Huron River was born as a small stream draining the late Pleistocene landscape. Its original destination was Lake Maumee at present day Ypsilanti where a large delta was formed. As centuries passed, ceding lake levels allowed the Huron to meander over new land eventually settling into its present valley. Its 125 mile journey today begins at Big Lake near Pontiac and ends in Lake Erie. The Huron’s watershed, which includes 367 miles of tributaries, drains over 900 square miles of land. The total drop in elevation from source to mouth is nearly 300 feet. The Huron’s upper third is clear and fast, even supporting a modest trout fishery. The middle third passes through and around many lakes in Livingston and Washtenaw Counties. Eight dams impede much of the Huron’s lower third as it flows through populous areas it helped create. Over 47 miles of this river winds through publicly owned lands, a legacy from visionaries long since passed. White Lake White Lake Mary Johnson The Great Lakes which surround Michigan and the thousands of smaller lakes, hundreds of rivers, streams and ponds were formed as the glacier ice that covered the land nearly 14,000 years ago was melting. The waters filled the depressions in the earth. The glaciers deposited rock, gravel and soil that had been gathered in their movement. This activity sculpted the land creating our landscape. In section 28 of Springfield Township, Oakland County, a body of water names Big Lake by the area pioneers is the source of the Huron River.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Michigan Family Fish Consumption Guide Important Facts to Know If You Eat Michigan Fish
    2008 MICHIGAN FAMILY FISH CONSUMPTION GUIDE Important facts to know if you eat Michigan fish MDCH Division of Environmental Health• 1-800-648-6942 Visit us on the web at www.michigan.gov/mdch-toxic, click on Michigan Fish Advisory TABLE OF CONTENTS HEALTH BENEFITS AND 1 Health Benefits & RISKS OF EATING FISH Risks 2 Get the Benefits HEALTH BENEFITS OF EatING FISH & Avoid the Risks ish are a great low-fat source of protein, vitamins and miner- 3 5 Simple Tips als. The omega-3 oils found in fish are important for the healthy Fbrain development of babies during pregnancy, breast-fed babies Cooking & and children. Eating fish can also reduce the risk of heart disease in 4 adults. The American Heart Association recommends that adults eat Cleaning Fish fish two times a week. 5 Mercury Advisory Health Risks of Eating Fish 6 How to use the Guide MDCH advises women of childbearing age Many chemicals end up in lakes, rivers, and children under oceans and in some of the fish we eat. 15 years old to be extra Eating polluted fish won't make you sick careful before eating right away. But the chemicals found in fish certain types of fish in can build up in your body and make you Michigan. very sick later on. Some of these Contact the Michigan Department of chemicals can harm your immune system, Community Health reproductive system, brain functions, or increase your risk of cancer. 1-800-648-6942 Children and babies that get too much of these chemicals may develop or www.michigan.gov/mdch-toxic, physical, mental or behavioral problems that they would not have had then click on Michigan Fish Advisory otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Huron River Report – Fall 2017
    Huron River Report Published quarterly by the Huron River Watershed Council FALL 2017 feature story Fishing the Home Waters Huron River becomes a destination for anglers The naturally nutrient-rich waters establishment of bait and guide shops of the Huron River and some of its in the watershed (see list, page 5). tributaries offer great habitat for a Here is the angler’s report. wide variety of fish. The prize fish found in these home waters attract The upper Huron anglers from diverse backgrounds, The upper headwaters of the Huron using an array of fishing styles. contain lakes with a variety of sizes Annually, the Huron River attracts and depths, producing a diversity 250,000 visitor-days for fishing, of fish populations. Larger lakes according to a study by Grand Valley like Kent and Pontiac have public State University (see article, page 10). access points that anglers can use So what are all these anglers looking to test the fishing waters. Many of for and how are they doing it? The the smaller lakes are private and answer depends on who you ask and accessible only by those owning where you are on the river system. lakefront property. Typically, anglers HRWC staff talk with many excited in the headwaters region approach anglers about their observations, by boat, floating or anchoring off These big smallmouth beauties can be successes, failures, and ideas shoals, underwater ridges or natural found at many locations along the river. about improving the game fishery. credit: Schultz Outfitters This interest encourages the continued on page 4 Planning Ahead Local governments and residents are key to the health of the Huron The Huron River is currently the supplies the Huron with clear, cool, spaces to the watershed’s health, it is cleanest river in Southeast Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Edison Power Plant Historic District
    Final Report of the Historic District Study Committee for the City of Ypsilanti, Washtenaw County, Michigan This Report has been prepared by the Historic District Study Committee appointed by the City Council, City of Ypsilanti, Michigan, on July 15, 2008, to study and report on the feasibility of providing legal protection to the Edison Power Plant, Dam, and Peninsular Paper Company Sign by creating the three-resource Edison Power Plant Historic District Submitted to Ypsilanti City Council December 15, 2009 Contents Charge of the Study Committee .............................................................................. 1 Composition of the Study Committee ..................................................................... 1 Verbal boundary description (legal property description) .................................. 2 Visual boundary description (maps) ...................................................................... 2 Washtenaw County GIS aerial view of Peninsular Park, location of Edison Power Plant, showing power plant, dam, parking area, park pavilion, & dock City of Ypsilanti zoning map showing Peninsular Park City of Ypsilanti Image/Sketch for Parcel: 11-11-05-100-013 Sanborn Insurance map, 1916 Sanborn Insurance map, 1927 Proposed Boundary Description, Justification, & Context Photos ...................... 8 Criteria for Evaluating Resources .......................................................................... 11 Michigan’s Local Historic Districts Act, 1970 PA 169 U.S. Secretary of the Interior National Register
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Township of Ypsilanti Parks & Recreation Master Plan
    Charter Township of Ypsilanti Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2014 - 2018 Prepared for the Ypsilanti Charter Township Park Commission Charter Township of Ypsilanti Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2014 - 2018 Ypsilanti Charter Township Park Commission Recommended for adoption on February 3, 2014 Lonnie Scott, Chair Keith Jason, Vice Chair Jasmine Mackey, Secretary Richard Roe, Treasurer Gail Boyd‐Palmer, Commissioner Evan Hayes, Commissioner Jimmie Maggard, Commissioner Monica Ross‐Williams, Commissioner Debbie Swanson, Commissioner Art Serafinski, CPRP, Recreation Director Ypsilanti Township Board of Trustees Adopted on February 4, 2014 Brenda Stumbo, Supervisor Karen Lovejoy Roe, Clerk Larry Doe, Treasurer Jean Hall Currie, Trustee Stan Eldridge, Trustee Mike Martin, Trustee Scott Martin, Trustee With assistance from: Spicer Group, Saginaw, MI Robert R. Eggers, AICP 119812SG2012 Table of Contents Ypsilanti Township Parks & Recreation Master Plan Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Community Description ....................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Structure ..................................................................................................... 9 Recreation Inventory ......................................................................................................... 15 Community Input..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Regular Meetings of the Washtenaw County Statutory Drainage Board
    HARRY SHEEHAN EVAN N. PRATT, P.E. Chief Deputy Water Resources Commissioner WATER RESOURCES COMMISSIONER SCOTT MILLER, P.E. Deputy Water Resources Commissioner 705 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 8645 Telephone 734.222.6860 Ann Arbor, MI 48107-8645 Fax 734.222.6803 email: [email protected] Office Open Monday – Friday www.washtenaw.org/drains 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE WASHTENAW COUNTY STATUTORY DRAINAGE BOARD Notice is hereby given that the Statutory Drainage Board for the Various Chapter Twenty Drains Drainage Districts (listed below) will meet on the following dates at 4:30 P.M. Michigan time, unless otherwise indicated, at 705 N. Zeeb Rd*, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Notice is given pursuant to Act 267, Public Acts of Michigan 1976. Further information may be obtained at the Office of the Washtenaw County Water Resources Commissioner. The County of Washtenaw will provide necessary reasonable auxiliary aids and services, such as signers for the hearing impaired and audiotapes of printed materials being considered at the meeting, to individuals with special needs upon 7 days’ notice to the County of Washtenaw. Individuals requiring auxiliary aids or services should contact the County of Washtenaw by writing or calling the following: Human Resources, 220 North Main Street, P.O. Box 8645, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48107, (734) 222-6800 Ext. 0 or TDD # (734) 994-1733. DATE OF NOTICE: April 15, 2021 *Due to COVID 19 restrictions and the local emergency resolution passed by the Washtenaw County Board of ______________________________________ Commissioners, meetings will be held remotely via Zoom Evan Pratt, Chair while the county local emergency remains in effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Millers Creek Watershed Manangment Plan Part 2
    5. EXISTING CONDITIONS This section is a general overview of conditions of Millers Creek and its watershed. Descriptions of individual reaches (sections of the stream) are also summarized in this chapter. Detailed descriptions of individual reaches within the creek, along with detailed site maps and photographs can be found in Appendix D. All the mapping data, in ArcMap format, can be found in Appendix E. A map of the reaches is shown in Figure 5.1. Each reach is referred to by the sampling station name at the downstream end of that reach. For example, the Plymouth reach ends at the Plymouth sampling station and includes all channel upstream of this sampling station. The Baxter reach begins at the Plymouth sampling station and ends at the Baxter sampling station. In some areas, the reaches are broken up into sub-reaches due to the heterogeneity of conditions within that reach. 5.1 General conditions Climate In Ann Arbor on average, 32-35 inches of total annual precipitation falls during roughly 120 days of the year (UM weather station data, See Appendix F). Over half the days with precipitation, the total precipitation amounts to 0.1 inches or less. On any given year, 90% of all daily precipitation events result in a 24-hour total depth of 0.66 inches or less. It is also highly probable in any given year that there are only 3 or 5 events with a 24-hour total of an inch or more of precipitation. During January, typically the coldest month of the year, temperatures average between 16 and 30 degrees Fahrenheit (°F).
    [Show full text]
  • Peninsular Paper Dam: Dam Removal Assessment and Feasibility Report Huron River, Washtenaw County, Michigan
    Silver Brook Watershed Riparian Buffer Restoration Report Great Swamp Watershed Association July 2018 PENINSULAR PAPER DAM: DAM REMOVAL ASSESSMENT AND FEASIBILITY REPORT HURON RIVER, WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN SEPTEMBER 2018 PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: HURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL PRINCETON HYDRO 1100 NORTH MAIN, SUITE 210 931 MAIN STREET, SUITE 2 ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 SOUTH GLASTONBURY, CT 06073 734-769-5123 860-652-8911 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Three Critical Issues ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Firm Overview .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Site Description .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Review of Existing Files and Historical Documents ......................................................................................................... 3 Field Investigation, Survey, and Observations ................................................................................................................ 4 Vibracoring and Sediment Sampling ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Huron River and Impoundment Management Plan
    Huron River and Impoundment Management Plan Our vision for the future of the Huron River in Ann Arbor can be summarized as: A healthy Huron River ecosystem that provides a diverse set of ecosystem services. We envision a swimmable, fishable and boatable river, including both free-flowing and impounded segments, which is celebrated as Ann Arbor’s most important natural feature and contributes to the vibrancy of life in the city. The river and its publicly-owned shoreline and riparian areas create a blue and green corridor across the city that contains restored natural areas and adequate, well-sited public trails and access. Ample drinking water, effective wastewater removal and a full range of high quality passive and active recreation and education opportunities are provided to the citizens of Ann Arbor. Ongoing public engagement in the river’s management leads to greater stewardship and reduced conflict among users. Our approach to management creates a model that other communities upstream and downstream emulate. Executive Summary The Huron River and Impoundment Management Plan Committee is pleased to provide the following draft plan, report, and recommendations to the Environmental Commission and City Council for their review and approval. The committee has met for the past two years to better understand the sometimes-complex interrelationships among the Huron river ecology, community recreation preferences, the effect of dams on river processes, and the economic implications of different recommendations. The Committee heard presentations from key user groups (e.g., anglers, paddlers and rowers, among others) and regulatory agencies (e.g., MDEQ Dam Safety, MDNR Fisheries). The committee included representatives from key user groups and community organizations including river residents, rowers, paddlers, anglers, the University of Michigan, Detroit Edison, the Environmental Commission, Park Advisory Commission, Planning Commission, and the Huron River Watershed Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Spots for Catfish in the Detroit Area
    Best Spots for Catfish in the Detroit Area 75 Waterford STONY CREEK 6 IMPOUNDMENT PONTIAC 1 LAKE 53 Pontiac Rochester 59 96 24 1 96 696 23 5 10 75 5 NEWBURGH 39 LAKE 94 96 Plymouth 14 DETROIT 275 153 er iv GEDDES R 4 it LAKE 12 o r t Ann Arbor e D Ypsilanti 12 94 94 75 FORD 3 BELLEVILLE LAKE Belleville 2 LAKE 23 Note: Map not to scale For a free copy of the Michigan Family Fish Consumption Guide, call the Michigan Department of Community Health at: 1-800-648-6942 or visit: www.michigan.gov/fishandgameadvisory These lakes in southeast Michigan have been stocked with channel catfish The catfish in these lakes are a healthier choice than the catfish in the Detroit River. Check the Michigan Family Fish Consumption Guide for advice on eating catfish from these lakes. 1. PONTIAC LAKE, OAKLAND COUNTY 4. GEDDES LAKE, WASHTENAW COUNTY Access: Pontiac Lake State Recreation Area, Williams Lake Rd., Access: City of Ann Arbor boat launch off Geddes Rd. west of north of M-59, four miles west of Pontiac. Boat launch and fishing US-23. Shore fishing in Gallup Park off Fuller Rd. west of Huron piers in Recreation Area. State park sticker required. Parkway and along paved path on south side of lake. Additional Information: Excellent catfish population with 2007 Additional Information: DNR 2008 survey showed good numbers survey showing many fish in the 18-24 inch size range. Good of catfish averaging 22 inches with many in the 20-25 inch range.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Fishing Guide
    2021 Michigan Fishing Guide Rules apply from April 1, 2021 - March 31, 2022 Get the digital guide at Michigan.gov/DNRDigests MICHIGAN FISHING LICENSE INFORMATION & REQUIREMENTS License Items & Fees Purchase your fshing license (and more) online at Michigan.gov/DNRLicenses. Item Type Fee DNR Sportcard $1 All -Species Fishing Licenses Resident Annual $26* Nonresident Annual $76* Senior Annual (Residents 65 or older or Residents who are legally blind – see p. 6) $11* Daily Fish (Resident or Nonresident) $10/day Angler can buy from 1 to 6 consecutive days Voluntary Youth (16 and under) $2* Combo Hunt/Fish Licenses (Base, Annual Fishing, 2 Deer) Hunt/Fish Resident $76* Hunt/Fish Senior Resident $43* Hunt/Fish Nonresident $266* Lost Licenses Lost your license? See the gray box below for instructions on getting a replacement. Fishing license fees are waived for Michigan residents who are veterans with 100% disability or active-duty military (see p. 6). All fshing licenses are good for all species allowed for harvest as indicated in this Fishing Guide. A $1 surcharge is included in the combo hunt and fsh licenses, resident annual, nonresident annual, and senior annual fshing licenses, as noted with the asterisk (*). Revenue generated from these funds will be used to educate the public on the benefts of hunting, fshing and trapping in Michigan, and the impact of these activities on the conservation, preservation and management of the state’s natural resources in accordance with statute. Learn more at Michigan.gov/DNR. Who needs a Michigan fshing license? Any adult actively assisting a minor must have A license is required when targeting fsh, a fshing license.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Management, and Status of Walleye, Sauger, and Yellow Perch in Michigan
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A S STATE OF MICHIGAN P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR41 January 2007 Ecology, Management, and Status of Walleye, Sauger, and Yellow Perch in Michigan James C. Schneider, Richard P. O’Neal and Richard D. Clark, Jr. Walleye Sander vitreus Sauger Sander canadensis Yellow Perch Perca flavescens www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 41 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 41 January 2007 Ecology, Management, and Status of Walleye, Sauger, and Yellow Perch in Michigan James C. Schneider, Richard P. O’Neal, and Richard D. Clark, Jr. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act).
    [Show full text]