DOCSLIB.ORG

Myspace 1 Myspace

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myspace 1 Myspace Myspace 1 Myspace Myspace Type Subsidiary Founded Santa Monica, California (2003) Headquarters Beverly Hills, California, U.S. Area served Worldwide Key people Tom Anderson (Co-Founder)/(ex-President) Chris DeWolfe (Co-Founder)/(ex-CEO) Owen Van Natta (ex-CEO) Mike Jones (Co-President) [1] Jason Hirschhorn (Co-President) [2] Revenue US$385 million (2009 est.) Owner News Corporation [3] Employees 1000 Slogan A Place for Friends [4] Website myspace.com IPv6 support No [5] Alexa rank 80 (May 2011) Type of site Social networking service Advertising Google, AdSense Registration Required [6] Users 34 million (March 2011) Available in 15 languages Launched August 2003 Current status Active Myspace,[7] stylized My_____[8] and previously MySpace, is a social networking website. Its headquarters are in Beverly Hills, California[9] where it shares an office building with its immediate owner, News Corp. Digital Media, owned by News Corporation. Myspace became the most popular social networking site in the United States in June 2006, a position that it held throughout 2007 until 2008.[10] In April 2008, according to comScore, Myspace was overtaken internationally by its main competitor, Facebook, based on monthly unique visitors.[11] [12] Myspace employs 1,000 employees, after laying off 30% of its workforce in June 2009;[3] the company does not disclose revenues or profits separately from News Corporation. Quantcast estimates MySpace's monthly U.S. unique visitors at 19.7 million as of May 2011.[13] Myspace 2 History After the 2002 launch of Friendster, several eUniverse employees with Friendster accounts saw its potential and decided to mimic the more popular features of the social networking website, in August 2003. Within 10 days, the first version of Myspace was ready for launch.[14] A complete infrastructure of finance, human resources, technical expertise, bandwidth, and server capacity was available for the site, right out of the gate, so the Myspace team was not distracted with typical start-up issues. The project was overseen by Brad Greenspan (eUniverse's Founder, Chairman, CEO), who managed Chris DeWolfe (MySpace's starting CEO), Josh Berman, Tom Anderson (MySpace's Fox Interactive Media headquarters, 407 North starting president), and a team of programmers and resources provided Maple Drive, Beverly Hills, California, where Myspace is also housed. by eUniverse. The very first Myspace users were eUniverse employees. The company held contests to see who could sign up the most users.[15] The company then used its resources to push Myspace to the masses. eUniverse used its 20 million users and e-mail subscribers to quickly breathe life into MySpace,[16] and move it to the head of the pack of social networking websites. A key architect was tech expert Toan Nguyen who helped stabilize the Myspace platform when Brad Greenspan asked him to join the team.[17] The origin of the MySpace.com domain was a site owned by YourZ.com, Inc.[18] It was intended to be a leading online data storage and sharing site up until 2002. By 2004, Myspace and MySpace.com, Original logo which existed as a brand associated with YourZ.com,[19] [20] had made the transition from a virtual storage site to a social networking site. This is the natural connection to Chris DeWolfe and a friend, who reminded him he had earlier bought the URL domain, MySpace.com, intending it to be used as a web hosting site,[21] since both worked at one time in the virtual data storage business, which itself was a casualty of the "dot bomb" era. Shortly after launching the site, team member Chris DeWolfe suggested that they start charging a fee for the basic Myspace service.[22] Brad Greenspan nixed the idea, believing that keeping Myspace free and open was necessary to make it a large and successful community.[23] Some employees of Myspace including DeWolfe and Berman were later able to purchase equity in the property before MySpace, and its parent company eUniverse (now renamed Intermix Media) was bought in July 2005 for US$580 million by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation (the parent company of Fox Broadcasting and other media enterprises).[14] [24] Of this amount, approximately US$327 million has been attributed to the value of Myspace according to the financial adviser fairness opinion.[25] Myspace 3 In January 2006, Fox announced plans to launch a UK version of Myspace in a bid to "tap into the UK music scene"[26] which they have since done. They also released a version in China[27] and have since launched similar versions in other countries. The 100 millionth account was created on August 9, 2006,[28] in the Netherlands.[29] The corporate history of Myspace as well as the status of Tom Anderson as a Myspace founder has been a matter of some public dispute. Oxfam America President Raymond C. Offenheiser, Wendi Deng, On November 1, 2007, Myspace and Bebo joined the and Rupert Murdoch with MySpace co-founders Anderson and DeWolfe at the 2006 Oxfam/MySpace Rock for Darfur event Google-led OpenSocial alliance, which already includes Friendster, Hi5, LinkedIn, Plaxo, Ning and SixApart. OpenSocial was to promote a common set of standards for software developers to write programs for social networks. Facebook however remained independent. Google had been unsuccessful in building its own social networking site (Orkut was succeeding in Brazil but struggling in the U.S.) and was using the alliance to present a counterweight to Facebook.[30] [31] [32] [33] By late 2007 into 2008, Myspace was considered the leading social networking site, and consistently beat out main competitor Facebook in traffic. At its peak, when News Corp attempted to merge it with Yahoo! in 2007, Myspace was valued at $12 billion.[34] [35] Decline Since 2008, Myspace has been in a continuing loss of membership, and there are several suggestions for its decline. One claim is that Myspace failed to innovate and stuck to a "portal strategy" of building an audience around entertainment and music, whereas Facebook and Twitter continually launched new features to improve the social-networking experience.[36] [37] A former Myspace executive suggested that the US$900 million three year advertisement deal with Google, while being a short-term cash windfall, was a handicap in the long run. That deal required Myspace to place even more ads on its already heavily advertised space, which made the site more difficult to use and less flexibility. Myspace could not experiment with its own site without forfeiting revenue, while rival Facebook was rolling out a clean site design.[38] These have been cited as factors why users, who as teens were Myspace's strongest audience in 2006 and 2007,[39] have been migrating to Facebook; Facebook which started strong with the 18-to-24 group (mostly college students)[40] has been much more successful than Myspace at attracting older users.[41] [42] [43] On April 19, 2008, Facebook overtook Myspace in the Alexa rankings.[44] [45] The site ranking of Myspace as of March 2011 was 69,[5] as opposed to the number 2 position held by Facebook.[46] Former AOL executive Jonathan Miller, who joined News Corp in charge of the digital media business, was in the job for three weeks when he shuffled Myspace's executive team in early 2009. Myspace President Tom Anderson stepped down while Chris DeWolfe was replaced as Myspace CEO by former Facebook COO Owen Van Natta.[47] [48] News Corp. Chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch was said to be frustrated that Myspace never met expectations, as a distribution outlet for Fox studio content, and missing the US$1 billion mark in total revenues.[49] Myspace has attempted to redefine itself as a social entertainment website, with more of a focus on music, movies, celebrities and TV, instead of a social networking website. Myspace also developed a linkup with Facebook that would allow musicians and bands to manage their Facebook profiles. CEO Mike Jones was quoted as saying that Myspace now is a "complementary offer" to Facebook Inc., which is "not a rival anymore." [35] Myspace 4 In March 2011, market research figures released by comScore suggested that Myspace had lost 10 million users between January and February 2011, and that it had fallen from 95 million to 63 million unique users during the previous twelve months.[50] Myspace registered its sharpest audience declines in the month of February 2011, as traffic fell 44% from a year earlier to 37.7 million unique U.S. visitors. Advertisers have been reported as unwilling to commit to long term deals with the site.[51] At the start of 2011, there was media speculation that Myspace Corp. will be auctioned during the year, and in late February, News Corp officially put the site up for sale. If Myspace were to be sold, it is estimated to be worth $50–200 million.[52] Losses from last quarter of 2010 were $156 million, over double of the previous year.[53] Re-design Throughout 2007 and 2008, Myspace redesigned many of the features of its site in both layout and in function. One of the first functions to be redesigned was the user home page, with features such as status updates, applications, and subscriptions being added in order to compete with Facebook. In 2008, the Myspace homepage was redesigned. Myspace Music was redecorated in 2008 and 2009, making it more like an online music store similar to iTunes and Rhapsody, along with the ability to create playlists. The use of Playlist.com on Myspace was abolished after the new Myspace music was launched. Some of the classic features of Myspace music, such as the artist directory, were also abolished.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Myspace Scoops up Popular Facebook App Ilike 19 August 2009, by RYAN NAKASHIMA , AP Business Writer
    MySpace scoops up popular Facebook app iLike 19 August 2009, By RYAN NAKASHIMA , AP Business Writer For instance, iLike already has 10 million users on Facebook. It attaches itself to Apple Inc.'s iTunes music store with song recommendations, notifies fans of upcoming concerts and Twitter posts by their favorite artists and allows people to see what their friends are listening to. It began selling songs in the MP3 format on Friday. "We believe what iLike has created isn't limited to just music and should extend to all the areas important to MySpace users, such as entertainment, video, and games," he said. Homepage of MySpace displayed on a computer monitor. MySpace on Wednesday announced it is Facebook, which ranked iLike among its top eight buying online music discovery hotspot iLike and plans to applications and the third most popular in its expand the service to other forms of entertainment such entertainment segment, said it did not expect the as games and films. acquisition to affect its users. Van Natta said the iLike technology would complement its MySpace Music joint venture, a free (AP) -- Social networking hub MySpace said music streaming and discovery platform it launched Wednesday it is acquiring iLike, a popular music with major recording companies in September. The application on rival Facebook, in the first move by two services, however, will not be integrated right new management to expand after a series of away. drastic cuts and writedowns. He noted that MySpace Music was "doing The $20 million agreement to purchase iLike extremely well," with monthly visitors nearly tripled confirmed rumors that had circulated this week.
    [Show full text]
  • Topline Questionnaire
    12 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Topline questionnaire January 2021 Core Trends Survey Topline Abt Associates for Pew Research Center Sample: n=1,502 U.S. adults ages 18 and older nationwide, including 1,202 cellphone interviews Interviewing dates: January 25, 2021 – February 8, 2021 Margin of error: ± 2.9 percentage points for results based on Total [n=1,502] NOTE: ALL NUMBERS ARE PERCENTAGES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ROWS/COLUMNS MAY NOT TOTAL 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. PERCENTAGES LESS THAN 0.5% ARE REPLACED BY AN ASTERISK (*). IF NO ONE ANSWERED THE QUESTION, THE CELL CONTAINS ZERO (0). A DOUBLE HYPHEN (--) INDICATES THAT THE RESPONSE OPTION WAS NOT PRESENT IN THAT SURVEY. OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS SURVEY HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY RELEASED OR HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE. SNSINT2 Do you ever use social media sites like Facebook, Twitter or Instagram? CURRENT 72 Yes 28 No 0 (VOL.) Don’t know 0 (VOL.) Refused www.pewresearch.org 13 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Trend based on internet users3 [N=1,413] (VOL.) DON’T YES NO KNOW (VOL.) REFUSED Current 77 23 0 0 February 2019 78 22 0 0 January 2018 77 23 * 0 November 2016 77 23 * * May 2016 74 26 0 * November 2015 74 26 * * July 2015 76 23 * 0 September 2013 74 26 * 0 May 2013 72 28 0 * December 2012 67 33 * * August 2012 69 31 0 * February 2012 66 34 * 0 August 2011 64 35 * 0 May 2011 65 35 * 0 January 2011 61 39 0 0 December 2010 62 38 * 0 November 2010 61 39 * * September 2010 62 38 * 0 May 2010 61 39 0 0 January 2010 57 43 * 0 December 2009 56 44 0 * September 2009 47 52 * * April 2009 46 54 * * December 2008 35 65 * 0 November
    [Show full text]
  • Twitter, Myspace and Facebook Demystified - by Ted Janusz
    Twitter, MySpace and Facebook Demystified - by Ted Janusz Q: I hear people talking about Web sites like Twitter, MySpace and Facebook. What are they? And, even more importantly, should I be using them to promote oral implantology? First, you are not alone. A recent survey showed that 70 percent of American adults did not know enough about Twitter to even have an opinion. Tools like Twitter, Facebook and MySpace are components of something else you may have heard people talking about: Web 2.0 , a popular term for Internet applications in which the users are actively engaged in creating and distributing Web content. Web 1.0 probably consisted of the Web sites you saw back in the late 90s, which were nothing more than fancy electronic brochures. Web 1.5 would have been something like Amazon or eBay, sites on which one could buy, sell and leave reviews. What Web 3.0 will look like is anybody's guess! Let's look specifically at the three applications that you mentioned. Tweet, Tweet Twitter - "Twitter is like text messaging, only you can also do it from the Web," says Dan Tynan, the author of the Tynan on Technology blog. "Instead of sending a message to just one person, you can send it to thousands of people at once. You can choose to follow anyone's update (called "tweets") simply by clicking the Follow button on their profile, or vice-versa. The only rule is that each tweet can be no longer than 140 characters." Former CEO of Twitter Jack Dorsey once accepted an award for Twitter by saying, "We'd like to thank you in 140 characters or less.
    [Show full text]
  • Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya the Zell Entrepreneurship Program at IDC
    Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya The Zell Entrepreneurship Program at IDC IDC (www.idc.ac.il) is the first private institution of higher education in Israel. Modeled on distinguished small colleges in the United States, IDC Herzliya is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in education and research. Its mission is to promote a culture where personal achievement goes hand in hand with social responsibility. The Zell Entrepreneurship Program at IDC (www.idc.ac.il/Zell) is open to outstanding students who have the ambition and ability to launch an en- trepreneurial venture. The program – established through a generous contribution from world-renowned entrepreneur Sam Zell of Chicago – is taught in English and aims to pro- vide a practical platform from which participants can launch businesses over the course of an academic year. VOLUME 35, NUMBER 3 POSTED WITH PERMISSION. COPYRIGHT © 2012 LEADERS MAGAZINE, INC. LEADERS 37 Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya Educating the Future Leadership of Israel Professor Uriel Reichman PROFESSOR URIEL REICHMAN WAS A DEAN OF But the students came and enrollment The university’s facility and staff ascribe to the Law School at Tel Aviv University (TAU) in steadily grew. IDC was a refreshing change from the belief that the contribution their students 1994 when he announced his plans to create the the alternative highly subsidized, established in- will make after getting the right education will Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya in Israel. stitutions. IDC quickly distinguished itself as a continue to support the values and advance- His vision was to establish a unique, world-class university that put its students at the heart of its ment of Israel as well.
    [Show full text]
  • LOEX of the West 2006 Program Descriptions
    Information Literacy for a Lifetime June 8 – 10, 2006 (Fairmont Orchid, Hawaii) 2006 LOEX-of-the-West, Program Descriptions Schedule At-a-Glance Thursday, June 8th 7:00 AM – Pre-Conference Continental Breakfast 8:00 AM 8:00 AM– Effective Teaching Techniques Making IL Relevant: Noon for One Shot Instruction Sessions Using Emerging Technologies in the Classroom 7:00 PM– Opening Reception 8:00 PM 8:00 PM– Big Island Talk Story (Hawaiiana Program) 9:00 PM Schedule At-a-Glance Friday, June 9th 6:00 AM– Continental Breakfast 7:00 AM 7:00 AM– Opening General Session - Creating Spaces for Alternative Ways of Knowing & Testing 8:00 AM Information Literacy and Global Citizenship: Making Podcasts and Promoting Lifelong A Checklist of Footholds and the Connection Screencasts: Opening Learning within the 8:15 AM– Information Foundations: Setting Between Lifelong Academic Library Constraints of the 9:00 AM Competencies for Freshmen on the Road Learning and Instruction to Global One-Shot: The Social College Students to Lifelong Learning Information Literacy Learners Sciences Perspective in the Global Studies Classroom Puffins, Popcorn, and Multimedia Library Retreat and Advance: Googlization of Parker Posey: Using Teaming Up: Faculty, Instruction for Multi- Extracting IL Information and User Interactive Librarians and 9:15 AM– Literate Net-Gens: Outcomes from Upper Preferences: Technology to Teach Technologists 10:00 AM Podcasts & Cable Level Curricula (or a Implications for Information Literacy Creating an Integrated Commercials at Prelude to Injecting
    [Show full text]
  • Jam City, Inc. and DPCM Capital, Inc. Mutually Agree to Terminate Business Combination Agreement
    July 23, 2021 Jam City, Inc. and DPCM Capital, Inc. Mutually Agree to Terminate Business Combination Agreement MIAMI & LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- DPCM Capital, Inc. (“DPCM Capital”) (NYSE: XPOA), a publicly traded special purpose acquisition company, and Jam City, Inc. (“Jam City”), a leading mobile entertainment company behind some of the world’s highest grossing and most enduring mobile games, today announced that both companies have mutually agreed to terminate the previously announced business combination agreement, effective immediately. In light of current market conditions, DPCM Capital and Jam City believe that terminating the business combination agreement is the best path forward for the parties and their respective stockholders. DPCM Capital intends to continue to pursue a business combination and is proceeding to evaluate alternative business combinations. About DPCM Capital, Inc. DPCM Capital, Inc. is a special purpose acquisition company led by Chairman and CEO Emil Michael, formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses. UBS Securities LLC acted as sole book-running manager for DPCM Capital’s initial public offering. Its common stock, units, and warrants began trading on the NYSE on October 23, 2020 under the ticker symbols XPOA, XPOA.U and XPOA WS, respectively. www.dpcmcapital.com. About Jam City Jam City is an award-winning mobile entertainment company providing unique and deeply engaging games that appeal to a broad, global audience. Led by CEO Chris DeWolfe, former MySpace co-founder and CEO, and COO Josh Yguado, former 20th Century Fox executive, Jam City is the creative powerhouse behind some of the highest-grossing and most enduring mobile games.
    [Show full text]
  • The Researching and Teaching Communication Series
    THE RESEARCHING AND TEACHING COMMUNICATION SERIES THE RESEARCHING AND TEACHING COMMUNICATION SERIES MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES AND DEMOCRACY IN AN ENLARGED EUROPE THE INTELLECTUAL WORK OF THE 2007 EUROPEAN MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION DOCTORAL SUMMER SCHOOL Edited by Nico Carpentier Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt Kaarle Nordenstreng Maren Hartmann Peeter Vihalemm Bart Cammaerts Hannu Nieminen The Intensive Programme in Media and Communication: Enlarging Europe – Enlarging Participation is supported by the Socrates Erasmus IP project (contract number: 69935-IC-1-2004-EE-ERASMUS-IPUC-6), the European Communication Research and Education Association (www.ecrea.eu), the University of Tartu – the Department of Journalism and Communication (www.jrnl.ut.ee) and a consortium of 19 universities. ISSN 1736–3918 (print) ISBN 978–9949–11–744–4 (print) ISSN 1736–4752 (PDF) ISBN 978–9949–11–745–1 (PDF) Copyright: Authors 2007 Tartu University Press www.tyk.ee Table of contents INTRODUCTION Introduction: Participation and learning. The intellectual work of the 2007 European media and communication doctoral summer school in Tartu......................................................................................................... 11 Nico Carpentier PART ONE SECTION ONE: TECHNOLOGY, DEMOCRACY AND POLICY Communication and technology: beyond determinism?...................... 27 Denis McQuail Public service broadcasting in a multimedia environment .................. 41 Jo Bardoel Towards the democratic regulation of European media and communication ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Web 2.0 Technologies
    Introduction to Web 2.0 Joshua Stern, Ph.D. Introduction to Web 2.0 Technologies What is Web 2.0? Æ A simple explanation of Web 2.0 (3 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc&feature=related Æ A complex explanation of Web 2.0 (5 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w&feature=related Æ An interesting, fast-paced video about Web.2.0 (4:30 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g Web 2.0 is a term that describes the changing trends in the use of World Wide Web technology and Web design that aim to enhance creativity, secure information sharing, increase collaboration, and improve the functionality of the Web as we know it (Web 1.0). These have led to the development and evolution of Web-based communities and hosted services, such as social-networking sites (i.e. Facebook, MySpace), video sharing sites (i.e. YouTube), wikis, blogs, etc. Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, it does not refer to any actual change in technical specifications, but rather to changes in the ways software developers and end- users utilize the Web. Web 2.0 is a catch-all term used to describe a variety of developments on the Web and a perceived shift in the way it is used. This shift can be characterized as the evolution of Web use from passive consumption of content to more active participation, creation and sharing. Web 2.0 Websites allow users to do more than just retrieve information.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Networking Service
    Social networking service A social networking service is an online service, platform, or site that focuses on building and reflecting of social networks or social relations among people, e.g., who share interests and/or activities. A social network service essentially consists of a representation of each user (often a profile), his/her social links, and a variety of additional services. Most social network services are web based and provide means for users to interact over the internet, such as e-mail and instant messaging. Online community services are sometimes considered as a social network service, though in a broader sense, social network service usually means an individual-centered service whereas online community services are group-centered. Social networking sites allow users to share ideas, activities, events, and interests within their individual networks. The main types of social networking services are those which contain category places (such as former school year or classmates), means to connect with friends (usually with self-description pages) and a recommendation system linked to trust. Popular methods now combine many of these, with Facebook and Twitter widely used worldwide, Nexopia (mostly in Canada); Bebo, VKontakte, Hi5, Hyves (mostly in The Netherlands), Draugiem.lv (mostly in Latvia), StudiVZ (mostly in Germany), iWiW (mostly in Hungary), Tuenti (mostly in Spain), Nasza-Klasa (mostly in Poland), Decayenne, Tagged, XING, Badoo and Skyrock in parts of Europe; Orkut and Hi5 in South America and Central America; and Friendster, Mixi, Multiply, Orkut, Wretch, renren and Cyworld in Asia and the Pacific Islands and Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Orkut in India.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS SANDYS, Derivatively on Behalf of ) ZYNGA INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9512-CB ) MARK J. PINCUS, REGINALD D. DAVIS, ) CADIR B. LEE, JOHN SCHAPPERT, DAVID M. ) WEHNER, MARK VRANESH, WILLIAM ) GORDON, REID HOFFMAN, JEFFREY ) KATZENBERG, STANLEY J. MERESMAN, ) SUNIL PAUL and OWEN VAN NATTA, ) ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) ZYNGA INC., a Delaware Corporation, ) ) Nominal Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: November 17, 2015 Date Decided: February 29, 2016 Norman M. Monhait and P. Bradford deLeeuw, ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT & GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Jeffrey S. Abraham and Philip T. Taylor, ABRAHAM, FRUCHTER & TWERSKY, LLP, New York, New York; Attorneys for Plaintiff. Elena C. Norman, Nicholas J. Rohrer and Paul J. Loughman, YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Jordan Eth, Anna Erickson White and Kevin A. Calia, MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, San Francisco, California; Attorneys for Defendants Mark J. Pincus, Reginald D. Davis, Cadir B. Lee, John Schappert, David M. Wehner, Mark Vranesh, Owen Van Natta, and Nominal Defendant Zynga Inc. Bradley D. Sorrels and Jessica A. Montellese, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C., Wilmington, Delaware; Steven M. Schatz, Nina Locker and Benjamin M. Crosson, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C., Palo Alto, California; Attorneys for Defendants William Gordon, Reid Hoffman, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Stanley J. Meresman and Sunil Paul. BOUCHARD, C. A stockholder of Zynga Inc. brings this derivative suit to recover damages the company allegedly suffered because the Zynga board approved exceptions to lockup agreements and other trading restrictions that allowed certain directors and officers to sell some of their Zynga shares in an April 2012 secondary offering.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors of Zynga Inc
    REPORT OF THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ZYNGA INC. February 27, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF THE STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTIONS ........... 5 A. The Three Derivative Lawsuits ................................................................ 7 B. The Nominal Defendant .........................................................................11 C. The Defendants ......................................................................................12 D. The Allegations ......................................................................................15 1. Allegations that Defendants Breached the Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty ....................................................................................17 a) Allegations Relating to Knowledge of Material, Adverse Information .........................................................19 b) Allegations Relating to Director Conflicts........................25 2. Allegations that Defendants Breached the Fiduciary Duty of Care .........................................................................................26 E. Timeline of the Derivative Lawsuits .....................................................28 FORMATION OF THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE .............. 31 A. The Members of the SLC .......................................................................34 B. Compensation ........................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Photo Release -- Zynga Appoints John Doerr to Board of Directors
    April 5, 2013 Photo Release -- Zynga Appoints John Doerr to Board of Directors SAN FRANCISCO, April 5, 2013 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Zynga Inc. (Nasdaq:ZNGA), the world's leading social game developer, announced today that John Doerr, General Partner of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, joined the company's board of directors. A photo accompanying this release is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/prs/?pkgid=17973. "John has been a supporter of Zynga since our early days, and truly understands our core values and mission," said Mark Pincus, CEO and Founder, Zynga. "John has worked with some of the most well-known companies in the world at every stage imaginable and his experience helping teams innovate at scale will be a tremendous asset for our leadership team. I'm personally looking forward to working closer with John, a true pioneer in the consumer internet space, and welcoming him to the board as a trusted advisor through this pivotal, transition year. John inspired us all to pursue creating internet treasures. He is a true missionary and will deepen and strengthen our DNA." "In just five years Zynga has connected hundreds of millions of people to their friends for fun. What's exciting is this is still day zero — just the beginning -- of social gaming's potential," said John Doerr, General Partner, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. "With its deep talent and multi-platform technology, and millions of happy customers, Zynga will engage more of us wherever we play — whether on the web, phones or tablets. I'm excited about working with Mark and the Zynga team in its next chapters of growth." John Doerr, general partner at Doerr joined KPCB in 1980, and has backed some of the world's most successful Kleiner Perkins Caufield & companies, including Google Inc.
    [Show full text]