Ons on Purdue's Diagrid
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Research Computing
PURDUE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH COMPUTING COMMUNITY CLUSTER PROGRAM Fall 2013 COMMUNITY CLUSTERS AT PURDUE UNIVERSITY ABOUT THE COMMUNITY CLUSTERS Information Technology at Purdue (ITaP) operates a significant shared cluster computing infrastructure developed over several years through focused acquisitions using funds from grants, faculty startup packages, and institutional sources. These “community clusters” are now at the foundation of Purdue’s research cyberinfrastructure. We strongly encourage any Purdue faculty or staff with computational needs to join this growing community and enjoy the enormous benefits this shared infrastructure provides: PEACE OF MIND LOW OVERHEAD COST EFFECTIVE FLEXIBLE Peace of Mind ITaP system administrators take care of security patches, software installation, operating system upgrades, and hardware repair so faculty and graduate students can concentrate on research. Research support staff are available to support your research by providing consulting and software support. Low Overhead The ITaP data center provides infrastructure such as racks, floor space, cooling, and power; networking and storage are more of the value that you get from the Community Cluster Program for free. In addition, the clusters are built with a lifespan of five (5) years, and ITaP provides free support the entire time. Cost Effective ITaP works with vendors to obtain the best price for computing resources by pooling funds from different disciplines to leverage greater group purchasing power and provide more computing capability for the money than would be possible with individual purchases. Through the Community Cluster Program, Purdue affiliates have invested several million dollars in computational and storage resources since 2006 with great success in both the research accomplished and the money saved on equipment purchases. -
Infrastructure for Data
Preston Smith Manager of Research Computing Support 9/16/2014 COMMUNITY RESEARCH DATA DEPOT: CLUSTER FACULTY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR MEETING DATA 2014-2015 TODAY’S AGENDA RESEARCH COMPUTING • Welcome (Donna Cumberland, Executive Director, Research Computing) • Introduction (Dr. Gerry McCartney, System CIO) • Research Data Depot (Preston Smith, Manager of Research Computing Support) • 2014-2015 Computation Plans (Michael Shuey, HPC Technical Architect) RESEARCH COMPUTING COMPUTATION STRENGTH Since Steele in 2008, Research Computing has deployed many world-class offerings in computation SIX COMMUNITY CLUSTERS STEELE COATES ROSSMANN 7,216 cores 8,032 cores 11,088 cores Installed May 2008 Installed July 2009 Installed Sept. 2010 ReHred Nov. 2013 24 departments 17 departments 61 faculty 37 faculty ReHred Sep. 2014 HANSEN CARTER CONTE 9,120 cores 10,368 cores 9,280 Xeon cores (69,600 Xeon Phi cores) Installed Sept. 2011 Installed April 2012 26 departments Installed August 2013 13 departments 60 faculty 20 departments 26 faculty #175 on June 2013 Top 500 51 faculty (as of Aug. 2014) #39 on June 2014 Top 500 June 2013 Top 500 WHAT IS AVAILABLE DATA STORAGE TODAY FOR HPC • Research computing has historically provided some storage for research data for HPC users: • Archive (Fortress) • Actively running jobs (Cluster Scratch - Lustre) • Home directories … And Purdue researchers have PURR to package, publish, and describe research data. SCRATCH HPC DATA Scratch needs are climbing Avg GB used (top 50 users) 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 Avg GB used (top 50 -
Better Than Removing Your Appendix with a Spork: Developing Faculty Research Partnerships
BETTER THAN REMOVING YOUR APPENDIX WITH A SPORK: DEVELOPING FACULTY RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS Dr. Gerry McCartney Vice President for Information Technology and System CIO Olga Oesterle England Professor of Information Technology OUR MISSION Implement novel business models for the acquisition of computational infrastructure to support research 2007: BEFORE CLUSTER PROGRAM • Faculty purchase computers in a variety of platforms from multiple vendors • Research computers housed in closets, offices, labs and other spaces • Grad students support computers rather than focus on research • Inefficient utility usage • Wasted idle time cycles • Redundant infrastructures for scattered sites 2008: STEELE A New, Collaborative Model • ITaP negotiates “bulk” research computer purchase • Existing central IT budget funds investment • Researchers buy nodes as needed/access other, idle nodes as available • Infrastructure/support provided centrally at no cost to researchers • Money-back guarantee “I’d rather remove my appendix with a spork than let you people run my research computers.” 2008: STEELE Results • 12 early adopters increase to over 60 faculty • 1,294 nodes purchased in 4 rounds o $600 savings per node (40%) o Collective institutional savings more than $750K • Ranking: 104 in Top 500; 3 in Big Ten • No one acted on money-back guarantee “ITaP completely took care of the purchasing, the negotiation with vendors, the installation. They completely maintain the cluster so my graduate students can be doing what they, and I, want them to be doing, which is research.” — Ashlie Martini associate professor of mechanical engineering, University of California Merced “In a time when you really need it, you can get what you paid for and possibly more, when available. -
[email protected] Erik Gough - [email protected] Outline
CMS Tier-2 at Purdue University Nov 15, 2012 Fengping Hu - [email protected] Erik Gough - [email protected] Outline ● Overview ● Computing Resources ● Community clusters ● Setup, challenges and future work ● Storage Resouces ● HDFS ● Lessons Learned Resources Overview ● Computing ● 1 dedicated clusters, 4 community clusters ● ~10k dedicated batch slots ● Opportunistic slots ● Storage ● Coexists with dedicated CMS cluster ● 2.4 PB Raw disk Purdue is one of the big cms t2 sites Community Cluster Program at Purdue ● Shared cluster computing infrastructure ● Foundation of Purdue's research infrastructure ● Peace of Mind ● Low Overhead ● Cost Effectives ● CMS bought into 4 clusters in 5 years ● CMS benefits from community clusters it didn't buy (coates, recycled clusters) ● Other VOs have opportunistic access 4 clusters in 5 years – steele ● Installed on May 5, 2008 ● Ranked 104th on the November 2008 top500 super computer sites list ● 8 core Dell PowerEdge 1950 – 7261/536 cores – 60Teraflops ● Moved to an HP POD, a self-contained, modular, shipping container- style unit in 2010 ● retiring 4 clusters in 5 years – Rossmann ● Went in production on Sep 1, 2010 ● Ranked 126 on the November 2010 TOP500 ● Dual 12-core AMD Opteron 6172 processors – 11040/4416 cores ● 10-gigabit Ethernet interconnects 4 clusters in 5 years – Hansen ● Went in production on September 15, 2011 ● Would rank 198th on the November 2011 top500 ● four 12-core AMD Opteron 6176 processors – 9648/1200 cores ● 10 Gigabit Ethernet interconnects 4 clusters in 5 years – Carter ● Launched -
Partnerships Purdue Ecopartnership Launches China Visiting Scholars
OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT FOR RESEARCH » Summer 2013, Vol. 4 Issue 4 Around 80 visiting scholars and Purdue faculty attended a reception at Discovery Park in February to kick off the Purdue-China Visiting Scholars Network. The network is designed to help faculty maintain successful partnerships with their Chinese colleagues on promising collaborations involving sustainability. Photography by Vincent Walter Partnerships Welcome Many ideas grow better when transplanted Purdue Ecopartnership Launches China into another mind than the one where they Visiting Scholars Network to Grow Global sprang up. —Oliver Wendell Holmes The spectacular complexity of today’s chal- Research Collaborations lenges — renewable energy sources, human The growing number of pins on Prof. Tim Filley’s large map of China tell health, sustainable technologies — require a story: Nearly 200 Chinese professors, graduate students and professionals partnerships both across the planet and down have ventured from their hometowns to Purdue this year, sharing their ideas, the hall. In this issue, we report on some of technologies, skills, culture and a thirst for discovery. Purdue’s promising collaborations, from a visiting scholars program bridging Chinese Filley hopes that someday, an equal number of Purdue faculty members and and U.S. interests in sustainability, to an graduate students will be traveling across the globe to advance their research inter-college partnership that has yielded a and learning careers in China while promoting sustainability in both countries. significant finding in understanding colorectal “Looking at this map, it is fascinating to see all the places from within China cancer, to the myriad collaborations between that are represented here at Purdue,” says Filley, a professor of earth, atmo- information technology professionals and spheric and planetary sciences and director of the U.S.-China Ecopartnership researchers that make high-level computa- tions possible. -
2012 Brochure
COALITION FOR ACADEMIC SCIENTIFIC COMPUTATION 1 Acknowledgments “Science is now increasingly computational, CASC Communications Committee data intensive, and collaborative because digital Chair: Kathryn L. Kelley technologies provide new ways for scientists to both Senior Director of Outreach Ohio Supercomputer Center create scientific information, and to communicate, Columbus, OH replicate, and reuse scientific knowledge and data.” Members: Changing the Conduct of Science in the Information Age: Jon Bashor Summary Report of Workshop Held on November 12, 2010. Computing Sciences National Science Foundation. June 28, 2011 Communications Manager Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA Melyssa Fratkin Industrial Programs Director Texas Advanced Computing Center The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX ABOUT THE COVER IMAGES: STIRRED TANK REACTORS are commonly Karen Green used in the pharmaceutical, bioprocessing and Director, Communications chemical industries to mix chemicals and create and Outreach products such as drugs, fertilizers and plastics. Renaissance Computing Institute The product yield depends on how well the University of North Carolina reagents are mixed, so understanding the fluid at Chapel Hill dynamics in the tank is critical for controlling thorough mixing. Such understanding can be gained via numerical Chapel Hill, NC simulation of the flow — a prime example of the value of scientific supercomputing for commercial industry. In the visualization on the front cover, depicting a view looking down into a tank from the top, reagents are being mixed Sue Fratkin using an impeller with blades pitched at a 45-degree angle, rotating at a prescribed speed, and located at about CASC Washington Liaison one third from the bottom of the tank. -
Report from the Symposium by David Bollier
Report from a Symposium on Innovative Ways That Universities Do Research By David Bollier University of Southern California, Office of Research The Norman Lear Center, USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 Introduction 7 A Quick Overview of Problems and Solutions 11 II. Innovative Research Communities 21 III. Digital Scholarship 28 IV. Networked Research in Big Science 37 V. New Methods for Evaluating Scholars and Their Research 45 Conclusion 47 Appendix A: A List of Participants 48 Appendix B: Top Suggestions From Across the Disciplines www.learcenter.org 2 • THE NORMAN LEAR CENTER CREATIVITY & COLLABORATION IN THE ACADEMY • ABOUT CREATIVITY & COLLABORATION IN THE ACADEMY Technology has enabled university research to become more rapid, more dynamic and more collaborative, but at the same time it has challenged – even upended – some academic traditions and practices. • As information is retrieved, distributed and shared more easily, quickly and cheaply than ever before, how will peer-review evolve and keep pace with innovation? • What is the role of departments and disciplines within research that increasingly requires networking and mobilizing multiple fields and institutions? • As teamwork has become a hallmark of innovation, how should the appointment and promotion process be modernized to reward and motivate collaborative achievements? • How do we balance technology’s ability to surmount distance, with the benefits of serendipitous personal encounters that occur on a bricks and mortar campus? This conference – held December 3, 2010 with participants from across USC and beyond – spotlighted novel ways that research communities use technology and innovative practices to foster creativity and collaboration; it showcased some of the research products emerging from those communities; and addressed the tensions between traditional academic culture and cutting-edge methods to expand knowledge and benefit society. -
Better Than Removing Your Appendix with a Spork: Developing Faculty Research Partnerships
BETTER THAN REMOVING YOUR APPENDIX WITH A SPORK: DEVELOPING FACULTY RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS Dr. Gerry McCartney Vice President for Information Technology and System CIO Olga Oesterle England Professor of Information Technology PURDUE’S IT MISSION Implement novel business models for the acquisition of computational infrastructure to support research 2007 at PURDUE: BEFORE CLUSTER PROGRAM • Faculty purchase computers in a variety of platforms from multiple vendors • Research computers housed in closets, offices, labs and other spaces • Grad students support computers rather than focus on research • Inefficient utility usage • Wasted idle time cycles • Redundant infrastructures for scattered sites 2008: STEELE A New, Collaborative Model • IT negotiates “bulk” research computer purchase • Existing central IT budget funds investment • Researchers buy nodes as needed/access other, idle nodes as available • Infrastructure/support provided centrally at no cost to researchers • Money-back guarantee “I’d rather remove my appendix with a spork than let you people run my research computers.” 2008: STEELE Results • 12 early adopters increase to over 60 faculty • 1,294 nodes purchased in 4 rounds o $600 savings per node (40%) o Collective institutional savings more than $750K • Ranking: 104 in Top 500; 3 in Big Ten • No one acted on money-back guarantee “IT completely took care of the purchasing, the negotiation with vendors, the installation. They completely maintain the cluster so my graduate students can be doing what they, and I, want them to be doing, which is research.” — Ashlie Martini associate professor of mechanical engineering, University of California Merced “In a time when you really need it, you can get what you paid for and possibly more, when available. -
Smithsonian American Art Museum (SAAM)
SMITHSONIAN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY 2015-2016 Office of Fellowships and Internships Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC The Smithsonian Opportunities for Research and Study Guide Can be Found Online at http://www.smithsonianofi.com/sors-introduction/ Table of Contents Anacostia Community Museum (ACM)................................................................................................................................... 2 Archives of American Art (AAA) .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center (APAC) ............................................................................................................... 6 Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage (CFCH) .................................................................................................................... 7 Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum (CHNDM) ............................................................................................................ 11 Freer Gallery of Art/Arthur M. Sackler Gallery (FSGA) ......................................................................................................... 15 The Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden (HMSG) ...................................................................................................... 20 Museum Conservation Institute (MCI) ................................................................................................................................