DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Strategy for Popularization of the Roman Heritage in the Cross-Border Area Between Romania and Bulgaria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Strategy for Popularization of the Roman Heritage in the Cross-Border Area Between Romania and Bulgaria THIS DOCUMENT WAS ELABORATED AS PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF PROJECT 15.2.1.038 “ANCIENT ROMAN CULTURAL HERITAGE INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATION ENVIRONMENT FOR THE CROSS BORDER AREA BETWEEN BULGARIA AND ROMANIA” (ARCHIVE) AUTHORS: FOR THE LEAD BENEFICIARY UNIVERSITY OF RUSE “ANGEL KANCHEV” PLAMEN ZAHARIEV, GEORGI HRISTOV, MIHAIL ILIEV, NINA BENCHEVA, YOANA RUSEVA, DIYANA KINANEVA, JORDAN RAYCHEV, IVANKA TSVETKOVA, SVILEN BORISOV AND IVAN BELOEV JOINT STRATEGY FOR THE SECOND BENEFICIARY ROUSSE REGIONAL MUSEUM OF HISTORY FOR POPULARIZATION OF NIKOLAY NENOV, VARBIN VARBANOV, THE ROMAN NIKOLA RUSEV AND DEYAN DRAGOEV HERITAGE IN THE FOR THE THIRD BENEFICIARY CROSS-BORDER AREA MUSEUM OF NATIONAL HISTORY AND BETWEEN ROMANIA ARCHAEOLOGY CONSTANTA AND BULGARIA GABRIEL CUSTUREA, GABRIEL TALMATCHI, IRINA SODOLEANU AND ANDREEA ANDREI 2017 JOINT STRATEGY FOR POPULARIZATION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE IN THE CROSS-BORDER AREA BETWEEN ROMANIA AND BULGARIA RUSE, BULGARIA CONSTANTA, ROMANIA 2017 WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 1 This document has been prepared as All rights reserved. No part of this partial fulfilment of document may be reproduced, Project 15.2.1.038 distributed or transmitted in any form “ANCIENT ROMAN CULTURAL HERITAGE or by any means, including by INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATION photocopying, recording or other ENVIRONMENT FOR THE CROSS BORDER electronic or mechanical methods, AREA BETWEEN BULGARIA AND without the prior written permission of ROMANIA” (ARCHIVE) the publisher. Copyright © 2017 Project ARCHIVE All rights reserved. University of Ruse “Angel Kanchev”, Studentska str. 8, Ruse 7017, Bulgaria www.archiverobg.eu WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 2 CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 2. MISSION AND GOALS OF THIS STRATEGY .................................................................................. 13 CHAPTER 3. ANALYSIS OF THE SELECTED ANCIENT ROMAN SITES ............................................................... 17 SEXAGINTA PRISTA ................................................................................................................................... 19 IATRUS ....................................................................................................................................................... 21 CHERVEN ................................................................................................................................................... 23 ABRITTUS ................................................................................................................................................... 25 NOVAE ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 DUROSTORUM .......................................................................................................................................... 29 DIMUM ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 TRIMAMMIUM .......................................................................................................................................... 33 TOMIS ........................................................................................................................................................ 35 HISTRIA ...................................................................................................................................................... 37 CALLATIS .................................................................................................................................................... 39 CAPIDAVA .................................................................................................................................................. 41 TROPAEUM TRAIANI ................................................................................................................................. 43 ULMETUM ................................................................................................................................................. 45 SACIDAVA .................................................................................................................................................. 47 CARSIUM ................................................................................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER 4. METHODS FOR POPULARIZATION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE IN THE CROSS-BORDER AREA BETWEEN ROMANIA AND BULGARIA ............................................................................................................ 51 POPULARIZATION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE THROUGH MUSEUM EXHIBITIONS ................................ 53 PROMOTION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE THROUGH TOURISM AGENCIES AND SERVICES .................... 55 INVOLVEMENT OF NATIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE POPULARIZATION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE ............................................................................. 57 UTILIZATION OF THE MASS MEDIA FOR THE POPULARIZATION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE ................ 59 WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 3 USE OF ONLINE PLATFORMS AND SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR POPULARIZATION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE .................................................................................................................................................. 61 PROMOTION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE THROUGH SCIENTIFIC EVENTS AND PUBLICATIONS ............. 63 PROMOTION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE THROUGH PUBLIC EVENTS AND FESTIVALS .......................... 65 IMPLEMENTATION OF MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR VISUALIZATION AND POPULARIZATION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE ......................................................................................... 67 EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES AS MEANS FOR POPULARIZATION OF THE ROMAN HERITAGE ................... 71 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................... 73 WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 4 PREFACE WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 5 WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 6 This document provides general Ruse “Angel Kanchev”, the Regional guidelines and recommendations for Museum of History in Ruse and the improvement of the popularization Museum of National History and mechanisms, which are currently used Archaeology in Constanta. All presented for the promotion and for the materials are copyright of the authors. advertisement of the roman heritage in This Strategy was produced as the cross-border area between Romania partial fulfilment of Project 15.2.1.038 and Bulgaria. “Ancient Roman Cultural Heritage The document is organized in Interactive Visualization Environment for several chapters. It starts with a short the Cross border area between Bulgaria introduction on the topic, followed by a and Romania” (ARCHIVE), co-financed by detailed presentation of sixteen ancient the European Union through the roman locations and a SWOT analysis for European Regional Development Fund each of them. In the next chapter, we under the INTERREG V-A Romania- present our general recommendations Bulgaria Programme. for improvement of the popularization The authors would like to thank activities and for promotion of the the Managing Authority and the Joint locations. These recommendations are Secretariat of the INTERREG V-A combined in several categories and are in Romania-Bulgaria programme, the alignment with the modern digital anonymous reviewers of the project technologies and the requirements of the proposal and all third parties, which new generation of visitors. were directly or indirectly involved in This document was elaborated by the work under the project. a joint team of archaeologists, museum We would like to present our workers, historians, university lecturers gratitude and to thank our families and and IT experts from the University of friends for their patience and support. WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 7 WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 9 WWW.INTERREGROBG.EU THE CONTENT OF THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTS THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 10 The developed strategy for measures should secure the long-term popularization of the ancient Roman competitiveness and sustainability of the heritage addresses
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Domitian's Dacian War Domitian'in Daçya Savaşi
    2020, Yıl 4, Sayı 13, 75 - 102 DOMITIAN’S DACIAN WAR DOMITIAN’IN DAÇYA SAVAŞI DOI: 10.33404/anasay.714329 Çalışma Türü: Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article1 Gökhan TEKİR* ABSTRACT Domitian, who was one of the most vilified Roman emperors, had suf- fered damnatio memoriae by the senate after his assassination in 96. Senator historians Tacitus and Cassius Dio ignored and criticized many of Domitian’s accomplishments, including the Dacian campaign. Despite initial setbacks in 86 and 87, Domitian managed to push the invading Dacians into the Dacian terri- tory and even approached to the Dacian capital in 88. However, the Saturninus revolt and instability in the Chatti and Pannonia in 89 prevented Domitian from concluding the campaign. The peace treaty stopped the Dacian incursions and made Dacia a dependent state. It is consistent with Domitian’s non-expansionist imperial policy. This peace treaty stabilized a hostile area and turned Dacia a client kingdom. After dealing with various threats, he strengthened the auxiliary forces in Dacia, stabilizing the Dacian frontier. Domitian’s these new endeavors opened the way of the area’s total subjugation by Trajan in 106. Keywords: Domitian, Roman Empire, Dacia, Decebalus, security 1- Makale Geliş Tarihi: 03. 04. 2020 Makale Kabül Tarihi: 15. 08. 2020 * Doktor, Email: [email protected] ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7442 75 DomItIan’s DacIan War ÖZ Domitian 96 yılında düzenlenen suikast sonucunda hakkında senato tarafından ‘hatırası lanetlenen’ ve hakkında en çok karalama yapılan Roma imparatorlarından birisidir. Senatör tarihçilerden olan Tacitus ve Cassius Dio, Domitian’ın bir çok başarısını görmezden gelmiş ve eleştirmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • O C a L a E L S a E
    l o c a l a E L S A e. V. n d & n e w s 42/43 s Grassland and Soils Grasland und Böden o Project-Report: • SONDAR INFORMATION N° 3 i Soil Strategy Network in the Danube Region l locallocal land land && soil soil news news 42/43 no.42/43 II/12 II/12 The Bulletin of the European Land and Soil Alliance (ELSA) e.V. c o n t e n t / i n h a l t e d i t o r i a l grassland and soils / 3–21 grasland und böden Zur Vielfalt von Grasland • Grassland and Soils – a global view Geschätzte Mitglieder und Freunde des Boden-Bündnisses • Grasses and Grassland: Biology – Grasland ist ein allgemein gehaltener Begriff für all jene Vegetationstypen, Utilization – Development in denen Gräser vorherrschen. Im Wesentlichen unterscheidet man zwischen • Grassland Soils – properties and functions natürlichen Vegetationstypen wie Steppen, Savannen, Trockenrasen, Moore • Salzwiesen, Dünen und Röhrichte – und solchen, die als Kulturgrasland (Grünland) vom Menschen mitgeprägt Pflanzengesellschaften am Extremstandort sind. Beim Kulturgrasland sind sehr unterschiedliche Agrarökosysteme zwischen Land und Meer entstanden, abhängig von der Bewirtschaftung durch Beweidung und/oder • LIFE Nature Project “Alkaline Fens in Bran- Mahd, von der Nutzungsintensität und Nährstoffzufuhr, vom Klima und den denburg” – Good news for fen restoration Bodenverhältnissen. Etwa ein Viertel der globalen Landfläche oder mehr als • Die CoEvolution von Gras und Grasern und zwei Drittel des landwirtschaftlich genutzten Bodens umfassen Grasland. ihre Bedeutung für die Potenziale nachhalti- Aus Sicht der Nutzung zählen zum Grasland insbesondere jene Flächen, – so- ger Land- und Weidewirtschaft genannte Grenzertragsböden –, welche aus natürlichen und wirtschaftlichen • Urban Grasslands: Between Nostalgia, Con- Gründen nicht anders genutzt werden können, zum Beispiel im Voralpen- trol of Nature, and Wildness und Alpengebiet.
    [Show full text]
  • M E M O R a N D
    UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT/ BULGARIA Final Report Bulgaria Municipal Energy Efficiency Project Project No. MAARD#D383005 Contract No. 183-C-00-03-00101-00 Prepared by: MWH Americas, Inc. 175 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604 and Electrotek Concepts, Inc. 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite 323 Arlington, VA 22201 May 31, 2004 Table of Contents General Information............................................................................................................ 1 MEEP Tasks........................................................................................................................ 1 Tasks Accomplishment....................................................................................................... 2 Task 1. Cooperation with all stakeholders involved in bankable project identification, development and financing............................................................................................. 2 Task 2. Enhanced business relationships with UBB and FIB......................................... 6 Task 4. Identification, development and financial deal structuring with UBB and FIB under the DCA Guarantees ............................................................................................. 8 Task 5. Project implementation and monitoring........................................................... 11 Task 6. Continue and enhance development of project financing with FIB and other lenders and investors....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Characteristics and Ecological Role of Protective Forest Belts in Silistra Municipality, Northeastern Bulgaria
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA 2019, Vol. 11, Issue 1 June 2019 pp. 191-204 Distribution, Characteristics and Ecological Role of Protective Forest Belts in Silistra Municipality, Northeastern Bulgaria Kiril V. Vassilev1*, Assen I. Assenov2, Nikolay I. Velev1, Borislav G. Grigorov2, Bilyana B. Borissova2 1 - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Department of Plant and Fungal Diversity and Resources, G. Bonchev str. 23, 1113, Sofia, BULGARIA; 2 - Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Faculty of Geology and Geography, Department “Landscape Ecology and Environmental Protection”, 15, Tzar Osvoboditel Blvd. 1504 Sofia, BULGARIA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. Protective forest belts are developed as a defense against dry winds and soil moisture loss and considered as natural capital nowadays. Silistra municipality’s protective forest belts were investigated about their distribution, floristic composition, vegetation structure and syntaxomony. During 2018 field season 32 relevés were collected following the Braun-Blanquet approach. Data about diversity of invasive and melliferous plants were collected also. Vegetation types were identified by numerical classification using hierarchical agglomerative clustering (PC-ORD). Descriptive statistics about the cover of tree, shrub and herb layers as well as cover of invasive and melliferous plants were graphically summarized in vertical box-and-whisker plots. The forest belts syntaxonomical diversity is represented by 2 associations (Cotino coggygriae-Quercetum cerris, Bromo sterilis-Robinietum) and Amorpha fruticosa-Morus alba plant community. Cotino coggygriae-Quercetum cerris has closed horizontal structure with dominants Quercus cerris and Cottinus coggygria in tree and shrub layers respectively. Bromo sterilis-Robinietum is characterized by poor species composition and vegetation dominated by Robinia pseudoacacia and Fraxinus americana, whereas Amorpha fruticosa-Morus alba community has local distribution and represents a final stage of vegetation degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Romes Enemies: Germanics and Daciens No.1 Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    ROMES ENEMIES: GERMANICS AND DACIENS NO.1 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK P. Wilcox | 48 pages | 25 Nov 1982 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9780850454734 | English | New York, United Kingdom Romes Enemies: Germanics and Daciens No.1 PDF Book Aurelian established a new college of high priests, under the name Pontifices Dei Solis. We should believe it because later Hesychios wrote about tattooed men in those areas where among others lived also Dacians. Mommsen shows that Julius Caesar was prepared to attack the " Danubian wolves ", being obsessed by the idea of the destruction of the non-Roman religious centers, which represented major obstacles for the Roman colonization. More search options. They did not do only the usual colouring of the body because Plinios reported that those marks and scars can be inherited from father to son for few generations and still remain the same - the sign of Dacian origin. Military uniforms are shown in full colour artwork. Allers Illustrerede Konversations-Leksikon' Copenhagen says that the Morlaks are some of the best sailors in the Austrian navy. But Dichineus is Dicineus as referred by Iordanes, a great Dacian priest and king of the kings. Cesar Yudice rated it liked it Jan 25, This ritual was practiced in Thrace and, most probably, in Dacia. Crisp, tight pages. He lived there for about three or four years. IV of Th. A painted statue left representing a Dacian is found in Boboli. Herodot tells us about "Zalmoxis, who is called also Gebeleizis by some among them". Members Reviews Popularity Average rating Conversations 85 2 , 3. The commander of the Dacians was Diurpaneus , according to the Roman historian Tacitus, a "tarabostes" namely an aristocrat, according to local denomination and to whom the king Duras Durbaneus, would grant his throne soon after Tapae's victory.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Process: Program Data
    FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data Cover.indd 1 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PUBLICATIONS 1 Donor’s Brief 2 Initiator’s Guide 3 Coordinator’s Guide 4 Moderator’s Guide 5 Forum Program Data 6 Forum Films Publisher: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) 3003 Berne www.deza.ch Concept and coordination: Tulum Ltd. CH – 6987 Caslano www.tulum-consult.com The information in this brochure was provided by: Balkan Assist Association, Sofia Foundation for Local Government Reform, Sofia Agency for Socioeconomic Analyses, Sofia Industrieconsult, Sofia Business Center, Svishtov Znanie Association, Lovech NGO Club, Targovishte National Alliance for Volunteer Action, Plovdiv Regional Association of Municipalities “Trakya”, Stara Zagora Center for Sustainable Development of Teteven Municipality, Teteven Compilation and processing: Diana Andreeva and Irena Boneva Summary of the information: Maya Krasteva Introduction texts: Ginka Kapitanova, Iva Taralezhkova and Alex Melzer Layout: Mark Manion, Commusication Arts Orders: SDC Distribution Center Telephone: +41 31 322 44 12 Fax: +41 31 324 13 48 E-mail: [email protected] © SDC 2007 FP Program Data Cover.indd 2 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data.indd 1 11/20/07 8:00:27 AM CONTEnts PROGRAM OVERVIEW ...........................................7 THE SDC FORUM PROGRAM IN BULGARIA 2000–2007..................7 Summary Table 1 – Program Outcome and Volume ..................9 Summary Table 2 – Timetable
    [Show full text]
  • The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora
    THE REMAKING OF THE DACIAN IDENTITY IN ROMANIA AND THE ROMANIAN DIASPORA By Lucian Rosca A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Sociology Committee: ___________________________________________ Director ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Department Chairperson ___________________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: _____________________________________ Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University, Fairfax, VA The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at George Mason University By Lucian I. Rosca Bachelor of Arts George Mason University, 2015 Director: Patricia Masters, Professor Department of Sociology Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis coordinators: Professor Patricia Masters, Professor Dae Young Kim, Professor Lester Kurtz, and my wife Paula, who were of invaluable help. Fi- nally, thanks go out to the Fenwick Library for providing a clean, quiet, and well- equipped repository in which to work. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGEMENT PLAN for Sustainable Use of Cultural Heritage in the Region of Silistra, Bulgaria and Calarasi, Romania
    MANAGEMENT PLAN for sustainable use of cultural heritage in the region of Silistra, Bulgaria and Calarasi, Romania The document is elaborated within project “EasyGuide – interactive mobile application for promoting the historical and cultural heritage in the region of Calarasi and Silistra”, e-MS code: ROBG-29, financed by the EU through the Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programe Municipality of Silistra, Bulgaria Lower Danube Museum Calarasi, Romania Lead partner Project partner Silistra, Bulgaria March 2019 www.interregrobg.eu Project “EasyGuide – interactive mobile application for promoting the historical and cultural heritage in the region of Calarasi and Silistra”, e-MS code: ROBG-29 The content of this material does not necessarily represents the official position of the European Union. 1 Table of contents I. Analysis of the project implementation .................................................................................... 3 1. General information for the project .................................................................................. 3 2. Project results.......................................................................................................................... 5 3. Effects of the project activities on the targeted groups ............................................. 10 3. Suggestions for future joint activities and policy measures ......................................... 10 II. Touristic objects in EasyGuide .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Energy 1/73 Fifth
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT ON BULGARIA’S PROGRESS IN THE PROMOTION AND USE OF ENERGY FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES Drafted in accordance with Article 22(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources on the basis of the model for Member State progress reports set out in Directive 2009/28/EC December 2019 1/73 REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS USED ..................................................................................................................................4 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT ............................................................................................................................5 1. Shares (sectoral and overall) and actual consumption of energy from renewable sources in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018) (Article 22(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ........................................................................6 2. Measures taken in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018) and/or planned at national level to promote the growth of energy from renewable sources, taking into account the indicative trajectory for achieving the national RES targets as outlined in your National Renewable Energy Action Plan. (Article 22(1)(a) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.a Please describe the support schemes and other measures currently in place that are applied to promote energy from renewable sources and report on any developments in the measures used with respect to those set out in your National Renewable Energy Action Plan (Article 22(1)(b) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ..................... 18 2.b Please describe the measures in ensuring the transmission and distribution of electricity produced from renewable energy sources and in improving the regulatory framework for bearing and sharing of costs related to grid connections and grid reinforcements (for accepting greater loads).
    [Show full text]
  • Harttimo 1.Pdf
    Beyond the River, under the Eye of Rome Ethnographic Landscapes, Imperial Frontiers, and the Shaping of a Danubian Borderland by Timothy Campbell Hart A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in the University of Michigan 2017 Doctoral Committee: Professor David S. Potter, Co-Chair Professor Emeritus Raymond H. Van Dam, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Ian David Fielding Professor Christopher John Ratté © Timothy Campbell Hart [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8640-131X For my family ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Developing and writing a dissertation can, at times, seem like a solo battle, but in my case, at least, this was far from the truth. I could not have completed this project without the advice and support of many individuals, most crucially, my dissertation co-chairs David S. Potter, and Raymond Van Dam. Ray saw some glimmer of potential in me and worked to foster it from the moment I arrived at Michigan. I am truly thankful for his support throughout the years and constant advice on both academic and institutional matters. In particular, our conversations about demographics and the movement of people in the ancient world were crucial to the genesis of this project. Throughout the writing process, Ray’s firm encouragement towards clarity of argument and style, while not always what I wanted to hear, have done much to make this a stronger dissertation. David Potter has provided me with a lofty academic model towards which to strive. I admire the breadth and depth of his scholarship; working and teaching with him have shown me much worth emulating.
    [Show full text]
  • Dio Chrysostom (707) Dowden, Ken
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Portal Dio Chrysostom (707) Dowden, Ken License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Dowden, K 2015, Dio Chrysostom (707). in I Worthington (ed.), Brills New Jacoby. Brill's New Jacoby, Brill. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Published in Brill's New Jacoby. Final version of record available online: http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/brill-s-new-jacoby General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]