DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Preservation, Parks, and Recreation Plan August 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Preservation, Parks, and Recreation Plan August 2017 Land Preservation, Parks, and Recreation Plan August 2017 LPPRP Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1 A. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN .......................................................................................................................1 B. PLANNING PROCESS SUMMARY .............................................................................................................1 C. KEY ISSUES SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................1 D. GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................................................................2 II. INTRODUCTION AND PLANNING CONTEXT ......................................................................... 3 A. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN .......................................................................................................................3 B. PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT.........................................................................................4 C. COUNTY CHARACTER AND EXISTING SYSTEM OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ..............................................................7 III. PARKS AND RECREATION ................................................................................................ 15 A. SECTION SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 15 B. EXISTING SYSTEM OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION AMENITIES ............................................................... 16 C. PARTICIPATION IN PARKS AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES ............................................................................. 28 D. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 33 E. GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 55 IV. NATURAL RESOURCE LAND CONSERVATION ................................................................... 59 A. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OF ST. MARY’S COUNTY CONSERVED NATURAL RESOURCE LANDS...................... 59 B. GOALS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE LAND CONSERVATION ............................................................................. 60 C. COUNTY CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCE LAND ............................................................................ 62 D. EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL RESOURCE LAND CONSERVATION PROGRAM .................................................. 79 E. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION .............................................. 85 V. AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION.............................................................................. 87 A. AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY AND FARMLAND PRESERVATION OVERVIEW ......................................................... 87 B. FARMLAND PRESERVATION GOALS ....................................................................................................... 90 C. CURRENT PROGRAM/POLICY IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................................................... 91 D. EVALUATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM/POLICY IMPLEMENTATION ........................... 102 E. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION ............................................ 109 APPENDIX A: STATEWIDE GOALS ....................................................................................... 111 APPENDIX B: ST. MARY’S COUNTY DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ............................................... 113 APPENDIX C: RECREATION TRENDS AND PARTICIPATION ESTIMATES ................................. 125 APPENDIX D: 2016 OPEN LINK SURVEY SUMMARY RESULTS ............................................... 153 APPENDIX E: 2016 RECREATION AND PARKS SITE INVENTORY ............................................ 161 APPENDIX F: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................. 167 APPENDIX G: PARK AND RECREATION MAPS ...................................................................... 171 Land Preservation, Parks, and Recreation Plan i LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Projected Population Growth 2000 to Figure 26: Educational Attainment of Young 2040 ................................................................... 8 Adults (ages 18 – 24) - County and State (2014) Figure 2: County Governing Structure for ....................................................................... 119 Recreation and Parks ....................................... 23 Figure 27: Educational Attainment and Median Figure 3: Program Enrollment: 2015/2016 Earnings of St. Mary’s County Residents Age 25+ Average ............................................................ 30 ....................................................................... 120 Figure 4: Top 6 Recreation Division Program Figure 28: Projected Growth of Households in Areas by Enrollment: 2015/2016 Average ....... 30 St. Mary’s County........................................... 121 Figure 5: Regular Season Sports League Game & Figure 29: 2014 Median Household Income Practices 2015 .................................................. 31 Comparison .................................................... 121 Figure 6: Projected Growth of Households in St. Figure 30: Median Household Income 2010 to Mary’s County .................................................. 33 2014 ............................................................... 122 Figure 7: Survey Respondents’ Annual Visitation Figure 31: Distribution of Median Household at Chancellor’s Run Regional Park ................... 37 Income in St. Mary’s County (2014) .............. 122 Figure 8: Proposed Patuxent Waters Figure 32: Employment of County Residents Conservation Area............................................ 76 Ages 16+ (2014) ............................................. 123 Figure 9: Land Use on Farms 2012 ................... 87 Figure 33: Employment by Industry in St. Mary’s Figure 10: Farms by Acreage Size 1997, 2002, County (2014) ................................................ 123 2007 & 2012 ..................................................... 88 Figure 34: Employment by Occupation of St. Figure 11: Market Value of Production: 1997, Mary’s County Residents (2014) .................... 124 2002, 2007, & 2012 .......................................... 89 Figure 35: Estimated Household Participation in Figure 12: Land Preservation Goal ................... 90 Fitness Activities ............................................ 126 Figure 13: MALPF Easements by Year .............. 95 Figure 36: Estimated Household Participation in Figure 14: Land Preservation Spending ........... 98 Outdoor Recreation Activities ....................... 126 Figure 15: TDR Program Implementation ...... 100 Figure 37: Estimated Household Participation in Figure 16: 2011 Trends: Preservation vs. Loss of Team and Individual Sports ........................... 127 Land in Farms ................................................. 103 Figure 38: Household Participation in Leisure Figure 17: Residential Lots Created by Planning Activities ........................................................ 128 Area ................................................................ 105 Figure 39: Estimated Annual Spending per Figure 18: St. Mary’s County, Maryland Recreation Expenditure Category .................. 129 Population Growth Trend .............................. 114 Figure 40: Sports Participation Rates by Figure 19: Population Age Distribution: 2010 to Generation 2014 ............................................ 130 2025 ............................................................... 115 Figure 41: Millennials (red) Vs. Non-Millennials Figure 20: 2015 Estimated Population (grey) on Health and Fitness .......................... 133 Breakdown by Age Cohort ............................. 116 Figure 42: Changes in Sport Activity Figure 21: Population Age Distribution: 2010 to Participation 2013 to 2014 ............................ 137 2040 ............................................................... 116 Figure 43: Most Popular Outdoor Activities by Figure 22: St. Mary’s County Racial and Ethnic Rate of Participation ...................................... 140 Character 2010 and 2014 ............................... 117 Figure 44: Favorite Outdoor Activities by Figure 23: St. Mary’s County Population Racial Frequency of Participation among Youths and and Ethnic Character 2014 ............................. 117 Young Adults (Ages 6 to 24):.......................... 140 Figure 24: Racial/Ethnic Character Comparison Figure 45: Favorite Outdoor Activities by 2014 – County to State .................................. 118 Frequency of Participation among Adults (Age Figure 25: Educational Attainment of Adults 25+) ................................................................ 141 (ages 25+) – County and State (2014) ............ 119 St. Mary’s County, Maryland ii LIST OF MAPS Map 1: County Context ................................................................................................................................. 7 Map 2: 2017 Public Parks and Recreation Network in St. Mary’s County .................................................. 10 Map 3: 2017 Parks and Recreation Density ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CITY of HUBER HEIGHTS STATE of OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M
    Agenda Page 1 of 1 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – Council Chambers 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: 2. Approval of Minutes: A. March 22, 2018 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion 4. Adjournment: https://destinyhosted.com/print_all.cfm?seq=3604&reloaded=true&id=48237 3/29/2018 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – City Council Chambers Meeting Started at 6:00pm 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: Members present: Bryan Detty, Keith Hensley, Vicki Dix, Nancy Byrge, Vincent King & Richard Shaw Members NOT present: Toni Webb • Nina Deam was resigned from the Committee 2. Approval of Minutes: No Minutes to Approval 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion • Mr. King mentioned the “Meet Me at the Park” $20,000 Grant campaign. • Mr. Detty mentioned the Lowe’s communication. • Ms. Byrge discussed the March 29, 2018 email (Copy Enclosed) • Mr. Shaw discussed access to a Shared Drive for additional information. • Mr. King shared concerns regarding “Banning” smoking at the park as no park in Huber is currently banned. • Ms. Byrge suggested Benches inside and out of the park area. • Mr. Hensley and the committee discussed in length the optional sizes for the park. • Mr. Detty expressed interest in a limestone entrance area. • Mr. Hensley suggested the 100ft distance from the North line of the Neighbors and the School property line to the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Fun Facts About the National Wildlife Refuge System
    A quarterly newsletter for Volunteers and Friends of the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center and Patuxent Research Refuge FRIENDS OF PATUXENT Vol. 30 • No. 2 www.friendsofpatuxent.org April-May-June 2019 Some Fun Facts About the Friends Co-sponsor Open House for National Wildlife Refuge System Research Community By Brad Knudsen, Refuge Manager at Bee Lab ot off the press from the U S Fish and Wildlife Service’s By Rich Dolesh, Chair, Headquarters in Falls Church, Friends of Patuxent H th Virginia, and just in time for the 116 birthday of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) on March 14, 2019, every refuge has received copies of a beautiful new publication entitled “Ex- perience the National Wildlife Refuge System.” It is in an easy to read format, brimming with facts and gorgeous pho- tos of what the NWRS is all about. Let Trumpeter Swan me share some of what I find to be the most interesting information. the entire NWRS with a specific pur- pose of supporting wildlife research; atuxent’s whooping cranes may First, of course, it emphasizes – “The thus, it is the birthplace and current be gone, but with the return of mission of the NWRS is to administer home of the USGS’ Patuxent Wildlife Pthe Bee Conservation Lab to a national network of lands and waters Research Center. the USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research for the conservation, management, Center, an entirely new opportunity for and where appropriate, restoration of The publication goes on to enumer- collaborative field research on bees the fish, wildlife and plant resources ate that the NWRS consists of 95 and pollinator/plant relationships is and their habitats within the United million land acres, 740 million sub- opening up at Patuxent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Osprey: ___ Email Me a Link to Download the Pdf, ___ Email Me a Notice It Is Available on the Website
    SEPTEMBER 2017 VOLUME 52, ISSUE 1 TheNewsletter of the SouthernOsprey Maryland Audubon Society President’s Perch Audubon Adventures Hopefully everyone had an adventurous summer. While our society has few summer events, we did have two that were noteworthy to share. On June 23 we had 20 attendees for our Osprey banding trip at Patuxent River Park, Jug Bay. Our leader, Greg Kearns, did his usual fabulous job, adding extra excitement at the end when the engine on the boat died! A park employee came to the rescue, adding only 30 minutes to the tour. The weather was the best you could wish for, and much fun was had by all. Unfortunately, it appears we are having another Atlantic Puffin year of nest failures; this makes two in a row. I am glad that SMAS was able to Photo by Tiffany Farrell have so many attend this trip; financial support is vital so researchers like Greg can continue to study the population and productivity of our SMAS signature bird. Our second summer event came from our newly formed Youth Outreach In This Issue Committee, chaired by Lee Vines. On Saturday, July 15 we had a dozen excited birders, ranging in age from 2 to 18, plus moms and a few adult birders who knew Calvert Cliffs State Park a good thing when they saw it. The folks at Ladybugs Alive! Sunflower Maze Field Trip at historic Bachelor’s Hope Farm in Chaptico invited SMAS to hold the event. Lee gave a fantastic explanation of the life cycle of the Monarch butterfly (see Cat Wars aerial picture of the sunflower maze in the shape of the Monarch caterpillar), then we enjoyed a bird walk around the farm led by SMAS board member Tiffany Magical Moments at Hog Island Farrell.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Funding
    2016 Bond Bill Funding During the 2016 legislative session, the Maryland General Assembly evaluated 155 bond bill requests that totaled nearly $32.5 million. The Senate and the House each funded $7.5 million in legislative projects; individual bond bills were not acted upon by the legislature. Instead, the General Assembly amended the State Capital Budget Bill (SB 191) to specifically list the projects selected for funding. The chart below indicates the status of those bond bills funded in 2016. The "Total" column on the right indicates the total amount of funding approved for each project. House Bill Senate Bill Amount House Senate Number House Sponsor Number Senate Sponsor Project Title County Requested Initiatives Initiatives Other Total Funding 432 Clippinger 790 Ferguson Baltimore Museum of Industry Statewide 500,000 200,000 200,000 1597 Oaks 1098 Klausmeier Girl Scouts of Central Maryland Urban Program Statewide 250,000 250,000 250,000 and STEM Center 1203 C. Wilson 972 Peters Patriot Point Statewide 500,000 250,000 250,000 500,000 1635 Clippinger 563 Ferguson Port Discovery Children's Museum Statewide 500,000 200,000 300,000 500,000 478 McCray 316 McFadden Ulman Cancer Fund Home for Young Adult Statewide 200,000 200,000 200,000 Cancer Patients and Caregivers 1539 Allegany County 1045 Edwards Friends Aware Facility Allegany 150,000 75,000 75,000 Delegation 1538 Allegany County 1044 Edwards Frostburg Museum Relocation Project Allegany 150,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 Delegation 987 Allegany County 900 Edwards Lefty Grove Statue Allegany
    [Show full text]
  • Unistar Nuclear Services, LLC
    ER: Section 2.5 Socioeconomics 2.5 SOCIOECONOMICS This section describes the socioeconomic characteristics of the areas that could potentially be impacted by the construction and operation of Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP) Unit 3 on the CCNPP site. This section contains four subsections: 1) Demography, 2) Community Characteristics, 3) Historic Properties, and 4) Environmental Justice. These sections include a discussion about the socioeconomic characteristics of the 50 mi (80 km) comparative geographic area and the two-county region of influence (ROI)) that includes Calvert County and St. Mary’s County, which are the primary areas of concern for the socioeconomic impact assessment. In addition, socioeconomic characteristics are also described for the 10 mi (16 km) emergency planning zone and the 2 mi (3.2 km low population zone (LPZ), which are consistent with NUREG-1555 (NRC, 1999). The 50 mi (80 km) comparative geographic area was established by using the CCNPP site as the center point and drawing a 50 mi (80 km) radius circle around the CCNPP site. This comparative geographic area is consistent with NUREG-1555 (NRC, 1999), as a basis for conducting the socioeconomic analyses and evaluating the potential radiological and accident impacts. The region of influence (ROI) for the socioeconomic analyses include Calvert County and St. Mary’s County, Maryland. The borders of these counties extend less than 30 mi (48 km) from the CCNPP site. These adjacent counties are located in the southern part of Maryland on a peninsula bounded by the Chesapeake Bay and the Patuxent River. Potential socioeconomic impacts, if any, arising from the proposed plant are likely to be confined to these two counties because a majority of the existing workforce for CCNPP Units 1 and 2 reside in these counties and it is assumed that the potential in-migrating construction and operational workforces for CCNPP Unit 3 are most likely to reside in this same two-county ROI.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland & Virginia Premier Pads
    MARYLAND & VIRGINIA PREMIER PADS Francis Scott Key Mall • Security Mall • White Marsh Mall • Dulles Town Center PATRICK MILLER JOE MEKULSKI [email protected] [email protected] 443-632-2042 443-632-1343 Mountaindale Smallwood Lawndale Dover Phoenix Myersville Englars Mill JacksonvilleSweet Air Boonsboro 165 194 UV27 UV Mousetown UV UV75 UV31 ¨¦§83 UV45 £¤40 Harmony Keedysville Dennings Bird Hill Oregon Ridge Park Cockeysville Glade Town Libertytown Walkersville j Appletown Gambrill State Park Weldon Unionville Glyndon 146 Antietam National Battlefield j £¤15 Morgan Run Natural Environment Area Cockeysville UV j j Reisterstown Greentop Manor Sharpsburg Clover Hill UV26 Franklinville South Mountain State Park Broadview AcresMt Pleasant Timber Grove Hampton Loch Raven Reservoir Rocky Springs Winfield Louisville Locust Grovej Middletown Fort Detrick j Delight Mays Chapel Rohrersville College Estates Liberty Reservoir Shepherdstown McKaig Dorsey Crossroads j Sunnybrook Hills UV25 Hampton 147 UV17 Braddock HeightsGrove Hill Soldiers Delight UV Frederick Owings Mills ¨¦§83 j Woodville Picketts Corner j Moler Crossroads Oak Acres Eldersburg Towson Piney Run Park Garrison Carney BurkittsvilleBroad Run 180 FRANCIS SCOTT KEY MALL Gillis Falls Resrv Site j Flohrville Ridgley Park Perry Hall UV Dorceytown Carney Grove New Market j Day WHITE MARSH MALL White Marsh Hernwood Heights Hillendale Dargan Mt Airy 32 Parkville Ballenger Creek Bartholow UV Pikesville Uvilla Briarcrest Heights Wellwood Nottingham Jefferson Monocacy National Battlefield Parrsville
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Arundel County Department of Recreation and Parks [email protected] 410-507-6862
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Colleen Joseph Chief Marketing and Events/PIO Anne Arundel County Department of Recreation and Parks [email protected] 410-507-6862 Anne Arundel County Department of Recreation and Parks Places Donation Trailers at Four Regional Parks Annapolis, MD (April 14, 2020) The Anne Arundel County Department of Recreation and Parks in cooperation with the Anne Arundel County Food Bank, Office of Emergency Management and Right Away Storage will have donation trailers in place starting Wednesday, April 15th, to encourage park visitors to donate non-perishable food items. The food bank has been experiencing a 200% increase in the numbers of residents who rely on the food pantries located throughout the county. Donating is considered an essential reason to leave your home. The trailers will be located at the four regional parks listed below. ● Quiet Waters Park - 600 Quiet Waters Park Rd, Annapolis ● Kinder Farm Park - 1001 Kinder Farm Park Rd, Millersvlle ● Downs Park - 8311 John Downs Loop, Pasadena ● Fort Smallwood Park - 9500 Fort Smallwood Rd,Pasadena “Bringing a food item in lieu of park fees is a great way to enjoy the park while helping out residents in need,” said County Executive Pittman. “Donations to the food bank are down, and this additional assistance from the Rec & Parks team, Office of Emergency Management, and Right Away Storage comes at an especially critical time. I thank everyone for stepping up and doing whatever is necessary to help.” Donation trailers will be available during normal park hours (7:00 a.m. to dusk). They will be placed as close to the park gatehouse as possible for easy access to residents dropping off donation items.
    [Show full text]
  • Patuxent Research Refuge Established in 1936 by Executive Order of President Franklin D
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Patuxent Research Refuge Established in 1936 by executive order of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Patuxent Research Refuge is the nation’s only National Wildlife Refuge established to support wildlife research. With land surrounding the Patuxent and Little Patuxent Rivers between Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD, the Refuge has grown from the original 2,670 acres to its present size of 12,750 acres and encompasses land formerly managed by the Departments of Agriculture and Defense. Throughout decades of change, Patuxent’s mission of conserving and protecting the nation’s wildlife and habitat through research and wildlife management techniques has remained virtually unchanged. Introduction Patuxent Research Refuge supports a wide diversity of wildlife in forest, meadow, and wetland habitats. The land is managed to maintain biological diversity for the protection and benefit of native and migratory species. During the fall and spring migrations, many waterfowl species stop to rest and feed. Over 200 species of birds occur on the refuge. A nesting pair of bald eagles has used the North Tract of the Refuge since 1989. Increasing forest fragmentation in the area due to urban development has damaged many populations of neotropical migratory birds. The refuge is one of the largest forested areas in the mid-Atlantic region and provides critical breeding habitat and an important nesting area for these species. Patuxent Research Refuge is divided into three areas: 1) North Tract, which offers hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, trails, and many interpretive programs 2) Central Tract, where the offices and study sites of the many research biologists are located, and 3) South Tract, where the National Wildlife Visitor Center and its trails are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Destination Southern Maryland
    Discover a place where there are still places to discover... A destination for a natural experience... St. Ignatius Church, Cemetery Battle Creek Cypress Swamp Sanctuary Calvert Marine Museum One of the oldest counties in Maryland and located Indian Head Rail Trail Calvert County, embraced by the Chesapeake Bay and Thomas Manor House and the Patuxent River, entices the visitor with 2880 Grays Road, Prince Frederick, MD 20678 14200 Solomons Island Road, Solomons, MD 20688 in the heart of the Baltimore-Washington-Richmond www.charlescountyparks.com • 301-932-3470 410-535-5327 • www.calvertparks.org 410-326-2042 • www.calvertmarinemuseum.com A 13-mile paved rail trail that connects the Town of 8855 Chapel Point Road, Port Tobacco, MD, 20677 a chance to discover and explore at the relaxed corridor, Charles County’s scenic natural charm can This 100-acre ecological In the only museum on the Indian Head with the White Plains 301-934-8245 • www.chapelpoint.org be seen in beautiful water trails, secluded parks, pace of a nautical lifestyle. Experience uncommon sanctuary features bald cypress, East Coast that is home to two area of Charles County. This former Founded in 1641 and located on events. Enjoy unspoiled natural areas. Embark on a nature trail on an elevated lighthouses, visitors can explore and unspoiled areas along the new Indian Head railroad corridor is now a regional a 120-foot bluff overlooking the unsurpassed outings for families or groups. boardwalk and a nature center Calvert’s rich maritime history Rail Trail that provide perfect opportunities for bird- favorite for runners, cyclists and confluence of the Potomac and Port Take time to hunt for 15 million-year-old with live animals and exhibits.
    [Show full text]
  • EARLY HISTORY of PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER (Circa 1948) by Dr
    1 EARLY HISTORY OF PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER (circa 1948) by Dr. L. B. Morley A REPORT ON THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PATUXENT RESEARCH REFUGE Introduction In the short span of twelve years the Patuxent Research Refuge has become an important institution in the program of wildlife restoration. It is a monument to those who have helped make it possible because they believed that research was a basic necessity. The Refuge was developed during the critical years of the depression and continued to progress through the turmoil of World War II. History was accelerated and little opportunity was given for the recording of events. Permanency has come to the Patuxent Refuge and with it organization and unfaltering progress toward the designed destiny. The period of confusion is past and the early construction scars have heeled. The function of the Refuge will remain an existing accomplishment, but the original incidents and events concerned with its founding and development already have become legendary. It is appropriate that the facts be recorded and that the history of the first national Wildlife Experiment Station be complete. Purpose The riotous squandering of our most valuable and priceless heritage, our natural resources, is appalling when we compare the duration of our national history with that of civilization. Many are cognizant of the recreational and economic importance of wildlife, and with the endless problems concerned with maintaining or restoring it, but too few, having no selfish or partisan interests, can or will contribute what is demanded. The new conception of wildlife requirements recognized the need for research as a prerequisite of building and administering an intelligent and practical program.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Paddle-In Campsites on the Chesapeake Bay
    A Guide to Paddle-in Campsites on the Chesapeake Bay By Ralph Heimlich Kayak touring involves a group loading their boats with all the camping gear and supplies needed for a several-day paddle. Ideally, launches and camping spots for kayak touring are spaced about a day’s paddle apart, say 10-12 miles for the average paddler. Another requirement is that the launch spot should be reasonably secure so that you have some assurance of finding an operable vehicle when you arrive back from the trip trying to drive home. This is a catalog of 57 formal paddle-in sites I know of on the Chesapeake Bay and tributaries. Contact me if I’ve missed any that you know about. There are numerous other “unofficial” (commando) sites that people have used. These are not suitable for groups or organized group trips. Patuxent River—The many sites along the Patuxent Water Trail are shown on the Patuxent Water Trail site (http://patuxentwatertrail.org/, and on the printed Patuxent River Water Trail Guide and GPS-ready Map by Dave Linthicum available at http://paxriverkeeper.org/product/patuxent-watertrail-navigation- map-non-waterproof-edition/. Paddle-in sites are listed by river mile (measured from the mouth of the Patuxent) and from upstream to downstream. Generally, these sites have a picnic table, fire ring, porta- potty and no water (exceptions noted). Reservations should be made well ahead of your planned trip since the process can be time consuming. Iron Pot Landing (River mile 44A (45 on the map))—This site is located just below the Billingsley Point manor house on Western Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2018 Newsletter Volunteer
    Friends of Kinder Farm Park Newsletter – Summer 2018 Page 1 Summer 2018 Newsletter Inside This Issue Page 1 – Volunteer Award Banquet Page 7 – Anne Arundel Bird Club Happenings… Page 2 – Volunteer for the Fall Harvest Festival Page 9 – Visit the Woodland Garden Page 3 – We Don’t Want No Naked Scarecrows Page 10 – Blue Bird Monitors Needed Page 3 – Temporarily Under New Supervision Page 11 – A New/Old Tractor Page 3 – Farm Education Livestock News Page 13 – Pieced Together Page 4 – Tips from the Chartwell Garden Club Page 14 – Fall Harvest Festival Page 5 – The Genesis of the Friends of Kinder Page 15 – Life in the Park Photo Competition Farm Park Page 16 – FoKFP 12 Month Calendar Page 6 – Summer at the Apprentice Garden Page 18 – Business and Organization Support Online viewing feature: You can control-click on the title in the index and go directly to the article. Volunteer Award Banquet present this would be the last time we By Mike Lowman, Friends of Kinder Farm Park Board Member would see Paul, This year’s who passed away a Volunteer Banquet few weeks later. took place on a Hosts Bill Offutt beautiful Friday and Carrie Fielder evening on the 1st presented the following awards: of June at the River Birch Pavilion. Special Friends Award: This annual event The FoKFP Farm Education Livestock Groups is given to thank volunteers for their continued This group of families that care for our permanent support of the Kinder Farm Park. This year, to breeding livestock here at the park and help assure everyone’s delight, Mission Barbeque catered the that our 4H have access to affordable animals for food.
    [Show full text]