Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd iudtmeauerneadcuei ob,i t uefr,anncnutn liquid. non-conducting a large form, its pure water gives its bonding in hydrogen be, this to bond, it together dia- covalent held can cause a a time and one to as this range another, matrix, structure temperature strong tetrahedral to liquid as similar similar not bonded a a Although carbon through has bonding. another tetrahedral water hydrogen to pure by each connected extremely is with however, 1. molecule hard; diamond Figure each so since a in mond is illustrated of macro-molecule bonding structure hydrogen this crystal to why the due imagine course of of thinks is one phenomenon If This expected. the surfac- be normally consider would briefly dialogue, that start 18 we rela- Before their react. and/or they molecules which surfactant tants with the chemical(s) on exclusively the focus with often tionship chemists surfactants, of discussion the In surfactants of aspects General 2 optimized. be period, can utility extended cost an the for understand studied can one been chemical have they nature, surfactants mature that in Because these reagents. encyclopedic and chemical be further green investigate can to as can have systems readers readers surfactant might that of that which review, reviews background complete ofmicelles and enough a give articles give to properties other than hopes and to Rather effectiveness references own. The numerous their literature. on with the explore examples in through found illustrated constantly be are will results new as task endless (i. micelles of review A Introduction 1 of areas major DOI: the all useful. in be reviewed to effects. found are Keywords: been environmental systems have their reagents micellar these including with where chemicals, chemistry chemistry green analytical analytical as green covers and of it properties achievements approach, The their replacing holistic solvents, in a chemical chemistry Taking analytical as chemistry. in factants surfactants greener of achieve uses to practical many solvents the organic to introduction an gives chapter This 1 spectroscopy in solvents organic of replacement a as surfactants chemistry analytical Green Pharr Y. Daniel GRUYTER DE hscneti free. is content This Berlin/Boston. GmbH, Gruyter de Walter 2017 © Pharr Y. Daniel Abstract: hmsr eatet M,Lxntn A240UA -al [email protected] E-mail: USA, 24450 VA Lexington, VMI, Department, Chemistry

/oe h eprtr ag twihwtri ntelqi tt smc rae n uhhge than higher much and broader much is state liquid the in is water which at range temperature the g/mole, 10.1515/psr-2017-0006 ’ ovn:wtr fwtrwr o oaudn,w ol avla t nqepoete.Atog only Although properties. unique its at marvel would we abundant, so not were water If water. solvent: ufcat,genceity ielrsolutions micellar chemistry, green surfactants, stecrepnigauthor. corresponding the is 1 ’

rprisaewl nw,adwt hi iepeduei nutytersft and safety their industry in use widespread their with and known, well are properties s .sratns eegns n op)a re hmclraet em ob nalmost an be to seems reagents chemical green as soaps) and detergents, surfactants, e. – h s of use the hsclSine eiw.21;20170006 2017; Reviews. Sciences Physical

oebcgon fsur- of background some 1 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd iei hrce.Mcle r yai nntr ihmvmn ftecutrin n ae nissurface its on water and counter-ions the of movement with nature in dimensions, dynamic small are of spec- Micelles shape character. Raman in in using ellipsoidal like studied spheres, extensively distorted been are has 1.5 Micelles formation excimer with core [8]. and the dependence measurements temperature of sound velocity and nature and [7] The observed. annihilation Fluorescence positron been probes, solubilized. having microviscosities fluorescence be troscopy, cP fluid, and can 30 hydrocarbon-like compounds to is micelle organic 10 the polar non-polar of of the core the of the where that counter-ions determined is of experiments density space polarization high center toward a The outward contains outside. face that that phase layer general groups Stern hydrophilic whose the the micelle, to (Gouy of the adjacent heads consists so- layer region of Stern aqueous The center water. The the a bulk [6]. in toward 2 the outward facing Figure positioned are in groups hydrocarbon shown head chain is hydrophilic structure three-dimensional long the dynamic hydrophobic as a the water CMC and In the number. lution at molecules aggregation occurs of the sphere number called or is The electrolytes. micelle ellipsoid critical like individual the act an termed surfactants is form what to ionic at value needed created this are Below which (CMC). micelles, concentration form micelle can surfactants the because occurs solubilization with mixed when however, ture, organic 10 of contain 100 amount only almost and that to type systems compared The water surfactants [5]. Urata in aqueous by using review surfactants reduced 2001 example, a tremendously For in is field. discussed waste replacing this is consider in Chemistry [2 done to Green been to reason systems now contribution new non-aqueous tial has a work and emulsifiers, added Much water), surfactants. has aqueous with aspect of in solvents friendly tension organic environmental used surface their been Chemistry, the lower substances have Green of (they nonpolar blockade. and advent agents separate the Allied dispersants, wetting majorchemical to and of as ability useful act agents, their to their also foaming to because due may due effort surfactants widespread war but water, so the reagents in been for aschemical has needed chemistry surfactants fats Surfactant Germany War, properties. considered of Great first the shortage during chemists a recently, expect: to originally an- More might due synthetic one detergents by than countries using an over30-billion-dollar varied developed are more started in been have and and detergents uses water Their surfactants hard that business. with estimate reports areas financial in Several molarity surfactants. replaced ionic the been of has [1]. lowering system but water, surfactant world-wide alkane in aqueous organic tant forms an the the to micelle clear push added a will is and when salt salt salt occurs a the soluble reaction if with a same form increase This micelles adding layer, where will phase. a aqueous water aqueous obtains cloudy of the one a nature of concentration, and dielectric out layer earth the organic alkaline because an phase the simplest with aqueous increases the in funnel one in soluble separatory can when more a MgCO charge is So, in if anionic surfactant group. an the to carbonate then with similar short, a group precipitate is functional as length salt seen alkane The be the octanol. If terms to alkane. compared an has ethanol and chemicals like salt additional water of thewater a these one: of in composition properties chemicals The the physical two state. on disordered more effect a direct into a state ordered an up breaking 1: Figure 2 ae,tems oua fslet,wl o islemlclsadcmlxsta r o-oa nna- in non-polar are that complexes and molecules dissolve not will solvents, of popular most the Water, surfac- used most the today still soap with times, Babylonian to back date may soap of version earliest The liquid, the of entropy the increases and matrix diamond-like this up breaks water to chemicals other Adding Pharr – h imn hp fpr water pure of shape diamond The 3.0

mrdu.A ihrsratn ocnrtosmc agrmcle a efre hc r rod are which formed be may micelles larger much concentrations surfactant higher At radius. nm – hpa obelyr eaae h yrpoi neiro h iel rmtebl aqueous bulk the from micelle the of interior hydrophobic the separates layer) double Chapman 3 CaCO ,

rai solvent. organic % surface ’ 3 yrgnbonding. hydrogen s active SrCO 3 age rBaCO or , t,(ufcat) isadges a ewse wy The away. washed be can grease and oils (surfactants), nts, – hmclmxue o xml,asa ufcati like is surfactant soap a example, For mixture. chemical 3 eeaddt ae.T hn fi nte way, another it of think To water. to added were − 2 o10 to − 4 –

surfactant M ] ihthe With 4]. EGRUYTER DE ’ poten- Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd irwtigtmsa ela oe rftpit.Teehv ensvrlrveso ohctoi andanionic supe- have bothcationic of and tolerant, reviews hard-water been several more have in- are There have points. CMC, values, Krafft [10 the lower surfactants CMC as at Gemini well smaller tension as exhibit surface times wetting They less when rior surfactants. and properties superior activity single-tailed of surface single-headed, number a creased other enjoy surfactants the Gemini to molecule. surfactant contrasted [9]. per softeners tails fabric two is as and and used groups esterquats es- also or through were betaine-esters molecule that as the surfactants to of cationic referred early center commonly the the is than to surfactant biodegradable linked on zwitterionic more is constructed of acid type are fatty This surfactants the linkages. where These ter cations alkylamphoacetates. ammonium and quaternary imidazolines be- of alkylamidopropyl from salts compared and derived costs betaine, are higher na- alkyl their hydroxysultaines, in Betaines of include found taine. because surfactants (often widely Zwitterionic phosphates as products. used sulfonates, not other as are to such surfactants a groups These others. of functional and of use carboxylates variety ture), the a how containing part studied. of negative fully example the been to not an compared have properties is they environmental and This its research of [9]. academic knowledge clear biodegradability in a used low only with its chemicals chosen be of can because chemical One ofthefirst industrial out mature phased was softener been fabric has derivatives. a andimidazoline which as use esterquats, widespread compounds, achieve soap. to quaternary and ordi-alkyl are sulfonates alkane which mono- secondary sulfates, detergents, esterified ether other than alkyl more and foam sulfates but alkyl water For hard sulfonates, phosphate. to alkylbenzene and susceptible are sulfosuccinate less dioctyl classes sulfonate, the sulfate, detergents possible: are laundry groups anionic other but hydroxide, 2: Figure their and surfactants common some of Eachof Examples 2. gemini. surfactants. Table and of in given classes zwitterionic are and anionic, characteristics examples cationic, polar many of nonionic, type has types: the Generally, groups surfactant solution. five these bulk of the one to micelle indicates the group from head molecules surfactant of exchange the with and GRUYTER DE ao oto fteehln xd hi na pnci tutr ntadhda eia tutr)adare and structure) helical dihedral a (not structure coil open [14]. have an themselves X-100) on in (Triton coiling chain of chains oxide in instead ethylene oxide hydrated typical ethylene the structures, of shorter helical portion with dihedral denotes major surfactants assume also a surfactants spectroscopy nonionic nonionic Raman the However, some The in molecules. core. the chains micellar lengthy of oxide the ethylene part of hydrophilic long nature the seen. the liquid-like were as that lines the act Raman indicate that additional reported peaks micelle spectroscopy Raman the Raman of These using surfactants region nonionic outer of the study in A micelle. coils polyoxyethyle- hydrated has forms oxides, that group type alkylamine head popular nated The alkanolamides, alkylpolyglycosides. and acid esters alkyl fatty sorbitan glycol polyoxyethylene ethers, alkylphenyl glycol polyethylene eiisratnsaedmrcsratnswt pcri ewe.Teemlclshv w hydrophilic two have molecules These between. in spacer a with surfactants dimeric are surfactants Gemini with surfactant (amphoteric) zwitterionic the of part positive the be also can salt ammonium quaternary The salts, ammonium quaternary of variety a dihydrochloride, octenidine are there surfactants, cationic For bysodium fat a of saponification the from group carboxylate a has normally soap surfactant, anionic an As hr r eea ye fnnoi ufcat:plehln lclaklehr rachlethoxylates, alcohol or ethers alkyl glycol polyethylene surfactants: nonionic of types several are There Micelle. – 13]. N,N -Dimethyl- N otdclcaea--mnu chloride, -octadecyloctadecan-1-aminium N -methylglucamides, Pharr 3 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd iels hti,terdge frgdt n oaiyi h oeado h ufc ein.Tefluorescence The regions. ratioofthe the surface the on [24].Specifically, of and regions environment core its solvent diverse the with in of changes polarity of pyrene nature and the structure rigidity fine on of spectra emission degree information their used worthwhile been is, provide have that environment investigations micelles, their These on micelles. based behavior study spectroscopic to altered show that molecules probe Several environment micelle the Probing 2.3 Quina with 1999 in again and [22] Pramauro two with published 1993 Hinze in points. (CPEs) Krafft exhibit extractions [23]. not point do cloud who on surfactants reviews nonionic excellent with occur can appear, phases two phase for both accountable [21]. surfactants, formation of forces micelle repulsion and phenomenon and separation attraction this surfactants, Apparently the nonionic between slope. positive balance of a subtle homologues exhibit the and For the reveals surfactants ion. different these however, counter for point seen; of slope is Krafft kind negative linearity same have the comparable continuous the and Sjöblom a between a with have relationship Gu surfactants relationships of linear These homologues a intensifies. [21]. afairly of is surfactants kinds solubility there ionic point and for that Krafft CMC micelles, found of the in and logarithm Above surfactants dispersed solution. Belowthis of be aqueous micelles. series can an form a surfactant reviewed in the even which surfactants of form, at crystalline amount willbe large in temperature remains the minimum which ananalyte, surfactant is of the value separation point effective Krafft the The for used later. be discussed can characteristics surfactant unique two These points cloud and Krafft The 2.2 [20]. intensity fluorescence of reduction a on in effects to resulting slight 20 tends have formation to of addition micelle apt prevents occurrence this are additives the solutions, Nonpolar Usually, micellar formation. CMC. micelle to prevent on the added even reliant may (e. is and are non-electrolytes urea CMC effects polar when the the increase For whereas media, alcohol, [18]. surfactant of added the concentration species increasing with the mixed of surfactants are nonionic nature for non-electrolytes true When the not is values. phenomenon This CMC [19]. salt their added and of concentration the on (CMC) log of dence [18]. spectrophotometrically seen is that sur- – form the or of itself characteristic with CMC a dimer normal et a with the or below Garcia far surfactant by concentrations aggregation the reported at the with as micelles) ion-pair altering factant a (mixed close thereby play micelle or micelle, also of ion-pair the may kind an of special factors form formation a other may the dye but in The CMC micelle. surfactant the the the at of with micelles interact may of dye formation The the dye role. fluorescent from microenvironment added the the anisotropy in in lifetime, change change aggrega- also fluorescence The size, but [17]. shape, measurements intensity characteristics: determine quenching fluorescence surfactant to only and other not used determine using being microviscosity to and Besides used number been [16]. tion also probes has as luminescence pyrene, CMC, or the salt, magnesium acid this result and anilinonaphthalenesulfonic CMC probe, fluorescent the a to as compared mechanism was transfer electron photo-induced the on established conditions by study recent more monoazacryptand a thanwould sitive In range [15]. a wider experiment at undergraduate an et occur Nakahara et in to luminescence Goodling by mayappear conditions. SDS, CMC dodecylsulfate, ambient sodium the in case because determine the to be difficult sur- CMC the the plotting make by can accomplished generally is analysis This factant foaming. and tech- tension, alsoscattering surface calorimetry, voltammetry, niques, potential/conductivity, electrode surfactant resonance, a magnetic nuclear determine fluorescence, to used been have methods Numerous CMC the of Determination 2.1 4 Hgop hr sa oiaino aiydsoitdgop n hnei h chromophore the in change a and groups dissociated easily of ionization an is there group, OH h lu on,tetmeaueweetemxuebcmscod steei hs eaainand separation phase a is there as cloudy becomes mixture the where temperature the point, cloud The depen- linear a has which CMC, the of lowering a exhibit solutions surfactant ionic to added Electrolytes Pharr ’ – ocnrto esstepyia rpryudrivsiain ihrtmeaue n pressure and temperatures Higher investigation. under property physical the versus concentration s SO 3

– l,teCCvle o ohnnoi n noi ufcat eeasse mlyn photosen- a employing assessed were surfactants anionic and nonionic both for values CMC the al., rmtseeto ihrwn nteaoai y.Tu,wt oeigo h K fany of pKa the of lowering a with Thus, dye. aromatic the on withdrawing electron promotes – aimcmlx t loecneitniyi ecpieyatrdbyenvironmental altered isperceptively intensity fluorescence Its complex. barium ’ rvosyrpre nteltrtr htue ,-ihnl135hxtin,o 8- or 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene, used that literature the in reported previously s

l 1]Teersacesfrhrpooeta h neato ftesurfactant the of interaction the that propose further researchers These [18] al. – 40

vv fogncc-ovns(tao n ctntie nwater in acetonitrile) and (ethanol co-solvents organic of (v/v) %

l aecaatrzdteCCadageainnme for number aggregation and CMC the characterized have al. ’ M nldn pcrsoy VVsbe IR, UV/Visible, spectroscopy, including CMC s

g., n achl) h M iiihswith diminishes CMC the -alcohols), ’ oo ol esll u othe to due solely be could color s ’ EGRUYTER DE structure s Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd neiri fetdb h ielrsz,cag,cutrin,saeadvsoiyrgrls fwhetherthe of regardless andviscosity shape ions, counter charge, size, micellar the by affected is interior No. {CAS ion 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonate the the of by deprotonation disturbed state 6358 not excited is with of quencher ions stabilization the a micellar (II) that and In of demonstrated exit copper [36]. study for probe and values the yield the micelle; SDS and of the both equations excitation in kinetic of molecules the guest of presence of of estimates methy- the rates the entry with effects in agreement quenching compounds in fluorescence were aromatic CTAB the in on of anthracene study nitromethane A or [35]. iodide proximity by mechanism lene overall reaction the pq the to facilitating the contributes interior because also the mechanism media static only micellar a hypothesized work that SDS shows Previous work in species. two this the but of mechanism, contact dynamic direct a a of evidence observed absorptions transfer donor 4,4 electron management. ground-state waste of to solution amount possible Inparticular a measured as and seen controlled tobequantified. being is as This address [34]. was themicelle 3-methylindole systems from surfactant with waste in animal by association caused odor theirfluorescence their the since permits of control fluorescence environment ontheir different had a Brij-35 in that effects attributes the sol- study preferentially to the used is were between pyrene 3-methylindole) alkylammonium that and difference of was noticeable with surface conclusion a increases the Their with studied. solubility at surfactant surfactants ubilized the the anionic that of the general and portion solu- in surfactants hydrophobic the that cationic the studied found of also and They length compounds micelle. chain aromatic the increasing eleven in some resides of probe phosphorescence trends the bility 0.01 that in time in monomer the processes a during timesof1 the exchanged, lose typically, for will, monitor micelle a andresidence a Conversely, as [33]. phosphorescence in solutions molecules using micellar the quantitatively micellar aqueous of measured deoxygenated different reentry were and different three micelle exit the the between as of difference surfactants out ionic the various and and study arenes to neutral small probe between equilibria a [31]. as microenvironment its used on anionic was systems: depending sodium 90-15-3} vary wavelengths of No. emission presence {CAS and the excitation 1-Naphthol in its changed as behavior number [25]. micellar aggregation micelle of the the that aggre- (0.1 of showed 91 nature the and chloride: the determine micelles elucidate SDS to of further used number was to investigated gation 70504-01-7} also No. was {CAS molecule 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene anonpolaren- probe Prodan, the In on group. the quenching whereby of aldehyde maximum, wavelength and the the n is the comes so thearomaticity trend increased this is400 is of same molecule: micro-environment explanation maximum the The fluorescence in [30]. the surfactants vironment cationic differences of two series the a from for potential surface electrostatic a the have to solvent reported increased the were with 10081 of shift naphthalene red plot et a and showed A Drummond Benzene that [25]. [29]. line micelle. studies a exhibited the NMR measure maximum wavelength of a on versus provide surface based stant to employed micelles the be in for also lo- environment can polarity and is hydrocarbon-like molecules acetophone molecule local These this (also core. of that the benzophenone degree than conclude molecule of rather can surface polar ben- one micellar like dependent, the the solvent molecules of on is neutral cated data of spectrum addition spectroscopic absorption the whose the upon ions) From pyridinium and 28]. ions itisinan counter [27, the alcohol of zyl concentration and indicating type ratioincrease the microenvironments changing III/I of hydrophobicity by the and determine micelle is seen to the in probe of coefficient effect a region partition as group this the used head and core, was the micelle Pyrene into [7]. the go environment will into organic which pyrene that pentanol between the on of somewhere push is addition distinctly pyrene The thereby increases by water. experienced ratio and environment alkane III/I the tocomparethem detected an that This that systems of shows than [25]. change smaller was ratio of micellar ratio methanol This the studies and although dodecane. SDS, in dodecylsulfate, hexane in probe sodium to like used water solvents from solvent been the organic altering has and peak water both the first with to peak fluorescence third GRUYTER DE ′ hs rb tde edpanyt h ietcnlso httemvmn fmlclsi h micellar the in molecules of movement the that conclusion direct the to plainly lead studies probe These the in enhancement dramatic a exhibited solution micellar SDS a Verhoeven, and Martens by study a In systems by CTABmicellar and SDS of studies quenching fluorescence the in used been also has Pyrene bprdnu ihoie pq dichloride, -bipyridinium – – 69 – π 39 – ee) sbogtblwta ften the of that below brought is level), * }bigsaiie ytectoi ufcatCA [37]. CTAB surfactant cationic the by stabilized being 6} – }t opl al fefcieitraildeeti osat nognzdmdaandtomeasure media in organized constants dielectric interfacial effective of table a compile to 7}

– al,15(0.2 105 NaCl), M D,cationic SDS,

l sd26dpey--246tihnl1prdnopeoie{Reichardt 2,6-diphenyl-4-(2,4,6-triphenyl-1-pyridinio)phenoxide used al. – n TBadnonionic and CTAB - 2+ ora fCeia Education Chemical of Journal β otllcsd iels[26]. micelles -octylglucoside acpo)we oprdt ooeeu ouin rCA.Techarge The CTAB. or solutions homogeneous to compared when (acceptor) ,

alad19(0.4 129 and NaCl M 2+ – cetrcmlxto ewe yee(oo)and (donor) pyrene between complexation acceptor shl nteaincsraeo h iel hl h yeei in is pyrene the while micelle the of surface anionic the on held is – ufcatmcle.Tredfeetidls(noe 1-methylindole (indole, indoles different Three micelles. surfactant

m(hsi u oa n an to due is (this nm – π ysletitrcinwt h xie tt 2] h effect The [25]. state excited the with interaction solvent by * – rtnX10 3] nasuyb lge et Almgren by study a In [32]. X-100R Triton

al,adsvrlohritrsigcharacteristics interesting other several and NaCl), M ril,akntc eosrto hw h effect the shows demonstration kinetics a article, – 0mcoeod,s oemnmr ilbe will monomers some so microseconds, 10 – π rniin.We h oaiyo the of polarity the When transition). * – 0 irscnswr reported were microseconds 100 π – π ee wihle ls to close lies (which level * ε oa absorptivity molar , ’ ’ ilcrccon- dielectric s y,CSNo. CAS dye, s N,N

l h kinetic the al. ′ -dimethyl- Pharr 5 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd ecigmnmraeajcn eas ftemcleaheiga nacmn fteplmrzto.Several polymerization. the andthe of enhancement the polymerization an procedure achieving thatcauses industrial micelle key the radical of a free because The polymerization, adjacent effect. are emulsion involved. proximity monomer for attractions a reacting charge producing used system the is micellar of catalyzed that a because be has reaction may one that reactions free-radical cationic some a the fact, by In is retarded C. example and or D, One quenched A B, but for for surfactant true locations are anionic possible options an three location by are same The There water. micelle. the in the Gouy or of or Layer, celle, core (Stern hydrophobic micelle the the inside in be partially initially: could B and A Both tem. much is {C} ions the of that yield found the therefore and [45]. triplets; solution system and methanol radicals SDS cation a an electrons, with in solvated larger photolysis of formation help the the may to to and compared et leads micelles SDS system Alkaitis Similarly, in micellar observed [44]. SDS readily systems mecha- in are micellar Such phenothiazine but of results. systems activity processes viscous catalytic recombination highly the ion in surface elucidate rapid observed micellar a only then the detected usually attraction, be if are charge Alternatively, well nisms may strong methods. which to photoconduction owing radicals, by ion-pair ion and long-lived the and absorption sep- stable ion-pair transient on catalyzed of by micellar formation depending both This success the dynamics process. in with the transfer protected results alters electron system be progression initial micellar aration can the that after ions directly shown radical micelles has exciplexes from state) The expulsion ground solutions. the normal in to dissociated compared is when that 4-nitro- state, with excited thiols of an in analysis fluorescence the in seen is acid;inthe times 10,000 of 5 N-n increase with1,4-naphthaquinone-2-sulfonic dramatic takes most reaction A itsreaction [20]. the CTAB micelles, ion using CTAB example Another of of cyanide [20]. SDS presence anionic analysis by fluorescence inhibited completely the was reaction is hydrolysis the while CTAB cationic of [42]. mixtures species concentration original CTAB the the making upon sulfonate of depending azonaphthol changes method also an the but of and shifts esters wavelength andvar- hexanoate absorption when counter-ions only of ofdiverse determined not reaction effects exhibited numbers hydrolysis the dye base-catalyzed aggregation the different concen- Reeves investigated on study atvarious the concentrations In acompanion explore ious surfactants help cationic to used. different were instigated two dyes was of different hexanoate (dyes presence study and aggregates the acetate This the of in [41]. hydrolysis dye of trations base-catalyzed sulfonate nature the azonaphthol and of an kinetics surfactant) of the the esters with studied asgreateffects Reeves not dimerizing but or [40]. like by SDS dyes with dye complexing sulfonphthalein cationic a the and retarded of CTAB, with of kinetics seen The the addition were surfactants. by micelle-forming accelerated of significantly was presence violet the crystal in solution alkaline reviewed[7]. in has been termined as surfactant differently ofeach to behave organic properties are expected an different the the of of of surfactants Because portions different kinetics reactants. end, the ionic the interactions andthe electrostatic with affect or system a also micellar solutes of may thehydrophobic at the charge ionic in core This occurring the dynamics surface. the the ina entail micellar that effects of polar These possible penetration For the reaction. andreactivity chemical by occur. also short desired repelled to a is or solubility absorbed or reaction It its be layer. penetration the may Stern affect deep solute for the that a orientation from factors exhibit proper may several distance the solute shorter of in nonpolar combination and The collisions a random solution. together are on reaction micellar closer based there kinetic longer are reagents faster no reagents is a organic the reaction facilitates some The as it micelle. solution, analyte, the inside anionic a reagent the in organic attracts the ion-exchange to micelle micellar volume pseudophase proximity asmall cationic its The in by the analyte. when ofreactants the example, and the proximity to reagents For the due [39]. micelles affected of between primarily use reaction are the a reactions the with that fluorocarbon, water proposes of a in model dissolved catalysis of be consist the to may compounds to organic it lead of but ability can aromatic) The tail. or double branched a (linear, even hydrocarbon or tail chained siloxane hydrophobic long The extractions. a and often photolysis most catalysis, is in used been have sur 6 hr r eea osberue o ecin otk namcla ytm o iperato fA+B + A of reaction simple a For system. micellar a in take to reactions for routes possible several are There existing complex, (a exciplexes of processes transfer electron of dynamics and state the on studies of series A solution aqueous an in constant rate higher threefold a pyronins cytotoxic of hydrolysis the for example, For de- were indicators sulfonphthalein of and dyes triphenylmethane of fading of rate the of study kinetic A → btl18nptaiieuigaCA ufcatsse [43]. system surfactant CTAC a using -butyl-1,8-naphthalimide Pharr ,oems oeie osdrtetasto tt n o titrcsi nauosmcla sys- micellar aqueous an in interacts it how and C state transition the consider sometimes must one D,

i sopsdt ecintm faot90 about of time reaction a to opposed as min – hpa ae rPlsd ae) h ufc ftemi- the of surface the Layer), Palisade or Layer Chapman

l xmnstemn ifrn pcrlprobe spectral different many the examines al.

l tde h ae htlssof photolysis laser the studied al.

i without min EGRUYTER DE “ ’ polar s traps → ” Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd hi uniaieaayi.Arcn ieauerve rvdsa xeln trigpitcnenn h occur- to the prior concerning separate just point starting them to excellent isolate beneficial an to provides be review and literature occasionally extraction recent may phase A de- It analysis. solid quantitative quantitative using method. their and simultaneously and qualitative surfactants samples sample, nonionic the and the Several of anionic for analysis. of validation pre-concentration proper methods and and analytical extraction termination, of various considered: be applicability must the factors influences also structure This vironment. biodegrade completely and rapidly to able be then conditions. will aerobic environment under aquatic in It biodegradability. ultimate surfactants tests for such that sources. assumed elements, screening carbon is specified other and certain any energy involving of surfactants, of as salts them classification use and arbitrary water and dioxide, compounds carbon these consume as and such end-products inorganic to surfactant. levels. broken-down the totally sur- three define for on biodegradation that of at properties results surface-active looked The be substances. organic can of factants breakdown microbial the means Biodegradation Biodegradation 3.1 [55]. conditions anaerobic and alcohol aerobic and both dodecylsulfate, under sodium biodegradable like Under readily [55]. sulfates, are conditions alcohol sulfates Fatty anaerobic ether biodegradable. under temperatures readily elevated Wastew- is at ions. soap processed calcium conditions, by is these precipitated and detergents rich primary and surfactant in soap is matter surfac- sludge include particulate anionic ater could and of matter than elimination Nonionic particulate sediment the anaerobic. is this and treatment tanks; soil wastewater or settling of on aerobic step sorption initial is greater established An much disposal [56]. have tants environ- their to the shown whether in been have upon fates surfactants and dependent cationic behaviors exceptionally various surface have is into Surfactants which released lands. effluent agricultural ment, the on through a disposal environment through sludge the expelled and treatment mainly into waters wastewater are disseminated surfactants of then the un- digesters and use, sludge biodegradability plant After rivers. treatment for the of sewage bottoms studied in They the found been and studied. layers have are soil been also conditions sub-surface has plants, and Anaerobic environment [9]. 56] the conditions [55, in anaerobic conditions surfactants der aerobic of under degradation degradable fromthese the risks readily from of data are fate environmental toxicity theconceivable The The agents. to evaluate [54]. sub- us chemical impact for organic useful environmental these indispensable and are of health studies field biodegradability public and for and laboratory consideration assessment important risk an environmental is of stances order evaluation the The that [53]. found vironment was [52]. It surfactants nonionic. nonionic and extensively > are cationic anionic data anionic, > toxicity nontoxic cationic surfactants: Aquatic are was of chloride. toxicity surfactants classes sodium of nonionic major to and us comparable three anionic LD50 the of Most 2- a for chemicals. having Those available and common and tetrachloride knowledge. used, time hazardous carbon widely the of one understand are benzene, at and state and of other determine to current and use research these and routine the data chemicals of the the of of nature on years in remember took viability reduction literature It ago laboratory. a updated the the enough in and at long ascertain naphthalamine solvent careers look to a our and of Sheet started try replacement Data who continually both Safety must by or- process their one However, replacing this including Surfactants used. in wastes. chemicals aspect hazardous of major of a amount generation be the eliminate can solvents or ganic reduce to wishes uses beneficial chemistry and Green Concerns they? are safe environmentally How 3 have involved there mechanisms [40], the systems and surfactant solutions in micellar violet of crystal the properties now with Since catalytic [51]. is reaction counterpart. the blue there non-aqueous into phenol also investigations its the numerous but preform chemistry, of out been one catalyst ways greener many does the use for in only of solvents the Not will report organic system on 50]. 1959 replace micellar 48, reviews to the 48, Several water that industry. 47, in expectation 19, in an surfactants [7, and of previously products use published consumer been the chemistry, have expect chemistry of analytical areas in many surfactants in of use to put [46]. been systems micellar water et in Fendler systems and catalytic of [7] development Thomas the by on discussed 2015 are systems interesting other GRUYTER DE h hmclsrcueo ufcat ly ao oei hpn hi feto h itcadaitcen- and abiotic the biotic on effect their shaping in role major a plays surfactants of structure chemical The the en- into way their find commonly surfactants industry, and home in use widespread their of Because have but right own their in studied been only not have micelles and surfactants of characteristics the of Each rmr biodegradation Primary liaebiodegradation Ultimate sweemcoraim as h osof loss the cause microorganisms where is

l 2]L oel rsnsarve in review a presents Sorella La [29] al. sahee hntesratn is surfactant the when achieved is ed eoi biodegradability aerobic Ready Pharr san is 7 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd htteewspeeec o h idgaaino h ograklcanLShmlg n xenlisomers external and homologs LAS chain alkyl longer the et of biodegradation Kruger showed the [55]. Results for alone concentrations. preference oxygen LAS dissolved was than increasing there longer with that improved times biodegradation three sed- of to rates river two the onto were ported adsorption that complex rates the biodegradations in giving results iments, unfortunately ofthe chloride by dialkyldimethylammonium charge and alkane. its charge ride nonpolar lose and surface entirely theoretically an would surfactant as group behave affect would sulfate can surfactant the the pH conditions and in pH protonated, low change being very A under material. example, interactions as solid For types of onto material. sorption the other more its sorption and changes of solution mechanism actually exact solution of anexperiment the The of [62]. study well one parameter the make humic interaction changing and for because materials options inorganic difficult the These and sediment. group a sulfate the in head on sulfonate material charge the the of from interactions interactions chemical electrostatic tail, and three organic group are the There from forming interactions. interactions electrostatic in hydrophobic nature with interactions: of chemicals their of fate ionic Besides types ways. The are of they chains. variety portion, branched a hydrophobic with from their chemical those from these micelles than at stud- toxic look well less to been and chemist allowed biodegradable laundry has has more fate popular surfactants much environmental most are their the chains Naturally year. linear of each The one produced ied. are pounds (LAS) of alkylbenzenesulfonates billions linear with detergents the surfactants, anionic the Among environment the in alkylbenzenesulfonates Linear 3.3 foaming enhanced exhibiting and strength/salinity ionic conditions, stability [59]. pH improved counter- and properties with synthetic temperature biodegradability their of better than range and effective wide toxicity more a lower over be having to as reported regarded phytoremediation. is are removal and Biosurfactants metals parts. heavy soil in onto biosurfactants 2 of adsorption (having use washing/desorption/extraction, carbon The activated soil CPEs, surfactants), ultrafiltration, using with by capacity metals ef- toxic adsorption of removal enhanced the et the and Shah for employed [59]. using extraction solution by both a accomplished to as impart be acting surfactants that can micelles fects the liq- pharmaceuticals on with of based solutes Sequestering is of agents. method permeability extraction stripping the selective The whichhas water. for membrane, for from liquid technology pollutants reported membrane emulsion these been is of uid removal method has the for extraction One surfactants attention Surfactant-enhanced ample acquired products. concern. care of personal different problem of major removal like a dyes becoming ionic effective [59]. remove is paper is to removal review it micelles this reverse because in of soils discussed use polluted also The was for pollutants. blue usedin technique methylene inorganic remediation and and a orange is normally organic methyl of as both purification used of the surfactants removal be in using the also as in another, can procedure one method flotation from This hydrophilic A ore. pollutantsispossible and 61]. hydrophobic copper of heavymetals separating [60, for Removal surfactants processing [59]. filter ore of the mineral of solution pores micellar the pesticides, than the as larger by is (such size pollutants their since micelles filtration Hydrophobic the in [59]. encapsulated ad- that are 100 Another chemistry hydrocarbons are technologies aromatic agents. PAHs) surfactant treatment decontamination and wastewater green water PCBs hydrocarbons, and and with petroleum soil soil environment as surfactant-based used the currently be clean the can emphasizes they surfactants, review for mirable role opposite an In Reclamation 3.2 with complex charged 58]. a forms which a chloride, in in- barium result titration, surfactants titrations of nonionic potentiometric type another by In analyzed changes. index be refractive and can method surfactants each of of disadvantages Epton classes and Several cluding advantages [57]. analysis, of references parameters numerous sewage basic with sediments, their wa- bottom with surface dust, waters, along sewage, ground indoor aerosols, and and deposits, ters, atmospheric street precipitation, the soil, including summarizes samples, includes liquid Theresearch and and sludge, techniques [57]. analytical samples the environmental different on in information surfactants of concentrations and rence 8 h omto fcmlxsbtenLSadctoi ufcat uha lytiehlmoimchlo- alkyltrimethylammonium as such surfactants cationic and LAS between complexes of formation The nation the in presence increasing an have products care personal and Pharmaceuticals Pharr ’ w-hs irto ehd[9.Teedon o irto a edtrie yturbidity by determined be can titration a for endpoint The [19]. method titration two-phase s ’ Hadincsrnt tpso osto loafc h eairo h ufcatin the surfactant of behavior the affect also too) ions of (types strength ionic and pH s “ pseudo-cationic ” oeue sdtcal yasratn-estv lcrd [19, electrode surfactant-sensitive a by detectable is molecule, – 00tmsmr oul nmcle hnbl ae.The water. bulk than micelles in soluble more times 1000

l lorve h aiu ehd htsratnscnbe can surfactants that methods various the review also al. ’ yrpoi neiradaermvdtruhultra- through removed are and interior hydrophobic ’ aewy.Their waterways. s – increased 4 EGRUYTER DE

l re- al. Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd aerpae utrayamnu opud ncmo sg [9]. esterquats reasons usage the common of in one compounds is ammonium this com- and quaternary ammonium conditions, replaced the anaerobic have improve quaternary under structure unlike biodegradable chemical ultimately Esterquats, also all the significantly. are in in surfactants pounds, biodegradation. surfactants bonds those of complete ester number of like accomplish a atoms biodegradability to of heterogeneous anaerobic biodegradation chain that anaerobic concluded food the They complex on classes. different detail a four of in in co-operation reported the found Jelen requires and those biodegradation Merrettig-Bruns Anaerobic like [9]. ab- microorganisms tanks, septic m are of of 10 bottom surfactants types than plants, Cationic deeper treatment water lakes microorganisms. sediment, and landfill by bottoms of metabolized bottom river the be at sludge can anionic the water onto in sorbed dissolved however. those conditions, Only aerobic of surfactants particles. under types biodegradable during these is alkylphenols It to to [71]. addition biodegradation owing anaerobic in work, of diethoxylates remediation course ethoxy- and field alkylphenol the monoethoxylates a for alkylphenol is appropriate undesirable X-100 Triton be into either [70]. not degrade act solution may can bulk these it from that surfactant, sorption found phenanthrene late and impede system to Edwardset sediment/aqueous or 69]. a heighten [68, in to phenanthrene unlikely metalmobility and is X-100 trace soil Triton on and surfactant land ionic embody crop effect can to significant them application a with surfactant have associated concentrations, to metals low the LAS[56]. the at However, of with risk. together environmental surfactants an of rates concentrations degradation on High farms. effect method, of no theapplication gation had that not, or showed ploughed, that been experiments had field soil by demonstrated the as whether soil and in accumulate not do and [67]. crops of 5] h ikassmn fti ls fsratnst ersra lnsadaiaswsdsrbdb Mieure by described was animals and plants microorganisms terrestrial to different surfactants of of capacities class metabolic this partial et of the assessment to risk due The bacteria [55]. of are ethoxylates consortium phenol a alkyl necessitates comparison, By tants 0 66]. of 65, values [55, with processes biodegradable aerobic less with plants treatment water some in oypeoi opud a on ntedgse ldeo h ws eaewsetetetpat with plants treatment sewage-waste Swiss of the distribution of The sludge [74]. digested 95 the growth in the es- found caused of an was nonylphenol of Soto compounds estrogenic nonylphenolic that presence nonylphenol Ana potential revealed the when about work in Investigative apprehensions 1991 only developed. containers, In multiply plastic activity generally in [74]. which behavior remainder same cells, the the cancer showed for breast trogen, that account detected ethoxylates School octylphenol Medical and Tufts natural market, 80 the about global cover disrupt ethoxylates the to Nonylphenol octylphenol. of subsequently APE and and nonylphenol studied estrogen are these consumed mimic to alkylphenols Prior to foremost [73]. capacity 3) its (Figure to hormones metabo- alleged of owing is Nonylphenol balance the disruptor [55]. to resilient endocrine more soil an looks derivative in be NP and the to but plants biodegradable, easily treatment be sewage polyoxyethylene to The appears in biodegradable. chain found readily not conditions is cos- aerobic metalworking. which (4-(2,4-dimethylheptan-3-yl)phenol), chemicals, and the nonylphenol recovery detergents, lite petroleum in as and down use textile break their have they pesticides, Besides APE, inpaints, also. Since ethoxylates, use uses phenol widespread industrial alkyl for find wa- desirable they the the PFOA less metics, clean and stop be to sulfonates to to used alkylbenzene industry considered be been linear can with recently osmosis surfactants: agreement reverse voluntarily popular or a two carbon activated earlier The with trillion had ter. treatment per which Water parts [72]. and 70 2006 PFOS with in the and production organic pollutant at PFOA advisories for health asa 2016 persistent established in which level Agency, Protection labeled Environmental EPA, surfactants US PFOA, the perfluorooctanesulfonate, is exception One environment the in Perfluorooctanesulfonate 3.4 the and layers soil sub-surface plants, treatment wastewater of digesters sludge rivers. of the bottoms in found are conditions [63].In rate 119 biodegradation ± anamplified caused 5170 dissolved oxygen have theinjected et in would McAvoy increase article, test review field a thatasupplementary continuous the results on his during concentration based suggests Kruger tests. field (i. GRUYTER DE

l h lodtrie htteeaestsatr agn fsft nteueo atwtrfrteirrigation the for wastewater of use the in safety of margins satisfactory are there that determined also who al. . -ad3pey) u htlbrtr eut eetot he ie rae hntoeeprecdin experienced those than greater times three to two were results laboratory that but 3-phenyl), and 2- e., oypeo n 5 and nonylphenol % opadohrsratnswl ec ihMg with react will surfactants other and Soap irri- wastewater and land crop to application sludge of result a as soils in found be can surfactants Anionic bacteria aerobic by metabolized promptly are LAS the land, on applied is plant treatment a from sludge Once teshv eotdsmlrrslswt saae eeso idgaain(97 biodegradation of levels escalated with results similar reported have Others

μ

μ /)wr n otoodr fmgiuegetrta hs eetdfrarbclydgse lde(152 sludge digested aerobically for detected those than greater magnitude of orders two to one were g/g) /) eosrtn htLSi erddmr xeiiul ne eoi odtos[4.Anaerobic [64]. conditions aerobic under expeditiously more degraded is LAS that demonstrating g/g),

hr-hi toyae,prilysneteei yrpoi auei nonylphe- in nature hydrophobic a is there since partially ethoxylates, short-chain %

l eotdta ocnrtoso A naarbclydgse lde(042± (10,462 sludge digested anaerobically in LAS of concentrations that reported al. – 20

aigbe ie 5] h opeesv idgaaino surfac- of biodegradation comprehensive The [55]. cited been having % 2+ n Ca and 2+ ofr ois hs edt dobwt solid with adsorb to tend These solids. form to ’ cone o bu 55 about for accounted s

l eotdo h itiuino non- of distribution the on reported al. – 99

)hvn enestablish been having %)

s nidsr.The industry. in use % Pharr

% 9 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd nmc esrqatte ntelaboratory. the in quantities lesser much in trefun eesdit h niomn per ohv a t ufcatla eue otheextentthat to [55]. reduced oforganisms 25varieties load over for had its surfactant exist margins safety have Superfluous Wastew- to slight. to bacteria. seem is of organisms processes variety appears aquatic a the treatment environment on via lethality Aerobic biodegradation into eliminated. ultimate released load and effluent primary surfactant prompt ater its for of conditions best quantity the substantial deliver a has plant a ment with [56]. substitution more and even groups, biodegradability alkyl the non-methyl lower of can number group the benzyl with reductions exhibit generally surfactants alkylbenzyldimethy- about >80 Investigations with as which biodegradable 95 [55]. released ultimately sludge, being matter sludge be sewage particulate to activated it in of in showed surface particulates chloride that lammonium the of shown to surface have adsorbed Having a positive studies the were Several surfactants for [78]. charged. attraction negatively strong unique properties principally increase their a also are of have can and surfactants humans because cationic or contaminants ecosystems, charge, environmental animals, to of other that protects toxic be lipidcoating diffusion to the known the are disrupt surfactants the surfactants These as [77]. chafing cells cause skin can surfactants to skin of exposure longed chlorides Dialkyldimethylammonium fungi, environmentally. LD and acceptable The troublesome low [56]. bacteria more very industry against have in is and agents surfactants nanoparticles, antiseptic gold cationic of and for synthesis softeners in situation used fabric wash, as mouth detergents, are laundry surfactants in cosmetics, cationic of uses major The environment the in surfactants Cationic 3.5 [56]. when improved CMC was their solubility above successful the were concentrations anticipated, studied as at trichlorobenzene, surfactants present and the was DDT all surfactant improved of not solubility the was but the soil conclusions, of major study organic a their the In of [76]. in one was biodegradation soils but polluted mineralization surfactant, in Biphenyl pounds either soil. by organic altered the 810 not Alfonic and was by mineral soil the mineral both the 10 in at in phenanthrene surfactants of Both biodegradation soil. mineral of a amount from phenanthrene of desorption of 1412 810 II Alfonic pollutants. of destruction microbial (<0.01 andpes- compounds aromatic hydrocarbons polyaromatic specifically et environment, Aronstein the ticides. into introduced being compounds organic surfactants of properties mem- surface-active specifically the of surfactants, function of a mechanism are [19]. which toxicity denaturation, the protein contemplates and disruption These one toxicity. brane reduce when usually will comprehensible groups oxide are ethylene trends increasing while toxicity, increase an generally is there 3: Figure nonylphenol that set has EPA The detergents. nonylphenols encourage laundry different to industrial 15 Initiative 6.6 in of Stewardship exceed products not Detergents use these should Safer resumes of concentration New or the out Significant starts used phase a manufacturer also voluntary recommended similar have a EPA a and They before the ethoxylates. These review 2014 EPA nonylphenol September [74]. an nonylphenol and On oblige EU. created to the sludge Rule in the Use regulations of in digestion resulted anaerobic have the results because partially and nol 10 narve ySotet Scott by review a In on other have would of micelles effects solubilization the how about concern some been also has There length chain alkyl increasing with structure: their upon contingent is surfactants nonionic of toxicity The Pharr – 6( iia ierachlehxlt oincsratn fsihl ogrlnt)icesdteextent the increased length) longer slightly of surfactant nonionic ethoxylate alcohol linear similar (a 56 tutr fannlhnl(et eieteetailhormone. estradiol the beside (left) nonylphenol a of Structure – 0 ufcat tlwcnetain a lo o h ieaiaino obdaoai com- aromatic sorbed of mineralization the for allow may concentrations low at Surfactants 60. 14 CO

l tde h feto o ocnrtoso ufcat nteboerdto ofsorbed biodegradation on the of surfactants concentrations of low effect the studied al. 2 5] ne eoi odtos h idgaaiiyo utrayamnu cationic ammonium quaternary of biodegradability the conditions, aerobic Under [55].

l h aaaalbesgetta a eaepsigtruhamdr at treat- waste modern a through passing sewage raw that suggest available data the al.

– )i ol eas ftepsil fetvns fsratnsfrsiuaigthe for stimulating of surfactants effectiveness possible the of because soil, in %) 50 ’ ,btaklezliehlmoimclrd a nL5 f0.35 of LD50 an has chloride alkylbenzyldimethylammonium but s,

μ / nfehwtrad1.7 and water fresh in g/L – 0( ierachlehxlt oincsratn)adNovel and surfactant) nonionic ethoxylate alcohol linear (a 60

μ / nslwtr[3 5.Te r tl used still are They 75]. [73, saltwater in g/L

ftecro-4lbldsurfactants labeled carbon-14 the of %

μ / fsi oiebyipoe the improved noticeably soil of g/g

ftecationic the of %

EGRUYTER DE /g Pro- g/kg. Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd pcrlpoete rmtebnr ope hti sal omdbtentemtladtelgns Rather ligands. the the with and happen metal to the the shown between was ligand formed separate usually different is a have that they forming complexes, complex than ternary binary call the Sometimes from character. properties its spectral changing complex determine metal indicator to the an used with in complex were changes shifts the absorp- the These UV in by and micelles. supported of surfactants dence shift presence some bathochromic the significant of a in CMC is complexes the there [84]. chelate method that metal analysis indicate for injection that wavelength flow reports a tion been in have solvents organic there other cases or many alcohol In isoamyl acetone, of use the eliminates 10 × 1.9 was ity nraigteslblt,wiei tesi a lob leigtepao h y n/ratal actively actually and/or dye the of pKa metal the pyrocatechol the altering using in be lanthanides agent also of chelating may number a it a were others as group in participating this while in solubility, Also the Al. increasing and 115 Y No. Sc, {CAS V, violet Ga, 139 Be, No. surfactants Ti, {CAS cationic F, zephiramine the including chloride, using tetradecyldimethylbenzylammonium dyes triphenylmethane and CTAC with CTAB, analyzed CPB, been have CPC, cations metal of number large A surfactants Cationic 4.2 [Co(SCN) familiar the forms [Co(H water complex pink with the mixture forms water acetone 625 in or at good which A alcohol thiocyanate electrolytes. with an of cobalt behavior in of the but reaction parallel the can is elec- that the this surfactants without of anionic molecules, example and organic of cationic that with to seen similar molecules, nature is oppositely-charged trostatic that behavior the a chromophore exhibit together the surfactants Nonionic brought by complex. experienced have or micro-environment forces [83]. the in solvent 1979 electrostatic altering by dramatically reported occur, the differences been interactions once to already hydrophobic had due (molar that that solvents sensitivity plausible methods in in the seems change increase of a It many 10-fold highlights with a Hinze reported often by review shift is early There An bathochromic polarity. chemistry. a analytical as, green well UV of as in type absorptivity), solvents this organic for success replace of to eas surfactants of use The UV 4.1 compounds [20]. as aromatic containers polycyclic effective other as of was or loss glass, solution the sample borosilicate inhibiting of the in in solution surfactant acetonitrile Brij-35 sample 40% for that utilized a shows be example alone can One ability storage. solubilization and This analysis. preservation in advantage major its indeed is and solvents 560 595 at 10 nickel of determination the 10 × 5.6 of visible absorption No. theUV CAS of {1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol, PAN chelo- with Most of metals with of complexation determination occur. through 85 the also ions also includes metal can must This of one that determination indicators. structure, the metric profile involve its reported spectral property within been available have the the that sites is in several methods solubilization changes are Although there and 50]. because kinetics, [47, micelles, consider for chemistry of analytical thought in often micelles most of reviews several are There chemistry analytical in Surfactants 4 [56]. re- substrate was growth because waters a occurs be coastal as degradation to in the used that found is surfactants signifying compound density, were cationic bacterio-plankton the but the in increase of conditions associated breakdown anaerobic an The with under ported [56]. persistent conditions et be Yang aerobic to by in judged summarized biodegradable were was environment although the surfactants in cationic surfactants of biodegradability The GRUYTER DE 4 – h ouiiainpoet fmcla ytm leitstene o rai rmxdaqueous mixed or organic for need the alleviates systems micellar of property solubilization The 85 vrterneo 11 of range the over mwt nasrtvt f65×10 × 6.5 of absorptivity an with nm –

m hswstebssfrtevsbedtcino oatuiga3 a using cobalt of detection visible the for basis the was This nm. }uigTio -0 stennoi ufcatfrtedtriaino oata 620 at cobalt of determination the for surfactant nonionic the as X-100 Triton using 8} – 4 iil spectroscopy Visible vrterneo 0 of range the over 4 vrterneo 0.4 of range the over – 41 – – – 1 p 8] loTMwsue ihTio -0 o h eemnto fnce at nickel of determination the for X-100 Triton with used was TAM Also [81]. ppm 110 }adactoi ufcatmda[9.I oecsstesratn nysest be to seems only surfactant the cases some In [49]. media surfactant cationic a and 3} iil n loecnesuishscue pclto htasratn oeuecan molecule a surfactant that speculation caused has studies fluorescence and Visible – π 0 p 8] ihTN -2tizllz)2npto,uigTio -0 for X-100 Triton using 1-(2-thiazolylazo)-2-naphthol, TAN, With [80]. ppm 100 lcrn fpyrene. of electrons

matra5mnrato iea Ho . iha bopiiyo . × 4.0 of absorptivity an with 9.2 of pH a at time reaction 5-min a after nm “ complexation – . p 7] o icuigTio -0 t555 at X-100 Triton using zinc For [79]. ppm 3.2 4 vrterneo 0.12 of range the over – y opeain nasuyb acek n aozthe Jarosz and Marczenko by study a In complexation. dye ” a cu ttesraeo h micelle the of surface the at occur may – iil pcrsoyhsbe n ftemjrar- major the of one been has spectroscopy Visible – ’ K aeas enwdl tde 4] Evi- [47]. studied widely been also have pKa s .0pmi olsmls[82]. samples soil in ppm 1.20

we-0nnoi ufcatthat surfactant nonionic Tween-80 % 4 ] 2 − ’ lecmlxta absorbs that complex blue dopino h surface the on adsorption

mwt nabsorptivity an with nm l at cdetr,and esters, acid fatty al.

m h absorptiv- The nm. ’ hre ae as layer charged s Pharr – organic 2 – O) 08 6 – ] 11 2+ 2} Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd oercdtriaino i(I osbsdo h ecinbtennce and (15 nickel SDS between of reaction use the sodium system aqueous using on solubilization 23873 (VI) based No. the Mo ions {CAS and as diphenylethenyl]hydroxylamine) (II) (III) nitroso-1,2- used Ru Ni also (II), of was at Pd determination SDS (II), SDS system. tometric Cu with SDS (II), 2540 alloys Ni an No.: steel (II), in {CAS Co and isoamylxanthate [101] of aluminum zinc determination in and spectrophotometric zirconium [100] the silver for of and determination [99] the 4.6 spectrophoto- for pH A used [47]. was surfactants chromophore red anionic same a used of 14337 have formation No. on that {CAS analyzed based 2-(3,5-dibromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol few being was but indicators) uranium(VI) (chelometric for system agents determination surfactant complexing metric nonionic ion and metal of cationic reports in of hundreds been have There surfactants Anionic 4.4 copper [49]. the system of surfactant absorbance N-[(4-nitronaphthalen-1-yl)diazenyl]-4- X-100 Triton the of a 2B, suppression in anion the by that Cadion cyanide by determine complexes silver to Cadion, com- and used also of was metal Cadion2B [97]. analog of system 1141 naphthalene determination 6708 No. No. {CAS The phenyldiazenylaniline the {CAS [96]. with 85 resorcinol cadmium used 5392 No. 4-(2-pyridylazo) No. {CAS been PAR, {Cas nitrobenzenediazoaminobenzene- 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-phenylazophenyl)triazene, has PAN, like Cadion, like X-100 reagents mophore solvents Triton organic soluble surfactant use aqueous normally nonionic that of plexes use The surfactants Nonionic 4.3 The data. observed and the micelle behind the force of driving SO surface the be being cationic to solution the isattributed reported the was on in sensitivity located anion Thisphenomenon anion of physically the the order being of of anexperiment. where product properties reported the exchange ion cases or results the place been analytical have taking the reaction There affects the 90]. used to [89, had surfactant method and cationic extraction, extraction the organic reported of an coupling earlier require the the not by vana- than did determined including: larger CTAB was cations in which of analysis out variety nitrite carried a for if reaction determine The to 88]. of used 87, dyes reaction [49, green uranyl Alizarin and indium the dium, were 130 studied No. were {CAS that S dyes Red Alizarin between acteristics CPC system. or binary CTAB the analysis, of zephiramine, than method surfactants absorptivities spectrophotometric a molar the for suitable greater [85]. of not however exhibited as presence reported that were metal Violet the Pyrocatechol the in with Complexes with Violet, complex Pyrocatechol Cyanine tertiary Eriochrome or a with formed S cation aluminum Azurol of complexes Chrome ternary R, of formation the for conditions experimental 12 6636 No. CAS {3,3-dimethyl-2-phenylindole, eemnto faoai leye,aie,adoie ihUV with oximes with and amines, aldehydes, aromatic of determination 25 from time cyanide reaction of the decreased reaction The determinations. spectroscopy 5,5 the visible with enhance in to ion this increase using an of examples cause early several will are surfactant therefore anionic and an dissociation expected acid as the and enhance compounds, generally organic pKa. systems of micellar pKa Cationic the [91]. decrease molecule probe the for pKa to studying elrrato aayi 9] eetyteueo TBadAiai re eedsrbdi h nlssof analysis [95]. the solutions in alkaline described in recorded were absorbance green in mi- Alizarin decrease for the and by CTAB projected drops, of as eye in use enhancements, used rate the bromide, relative Recently benzalkonium larger [94]. exhibited catalysis reactants reaction acid cellar CTAB amino after hydrophilic peptides more and The acids amino of determination xcl o h ufcatitrcswstesbeto otmoaysuyi 06o h idn char- binding the on 2016 in study contemporary a of subject the was interacts surfactant the how Exactly aincsratnsaekonfo aayi tde ofcltt ulohlcsbttto ecin.There reactions. substitution nucleophilic facilitate to studies catalysis from known are surfactants Cationic p ntohnlaeaei h rsneo TB[3.I 99Cneset Conners 1979 In [93]. CTAB of presence the in acetate -nitrophenyl Pharr p ′ dtibs2ntoezi cd odslc h orsodn bobn ho no,uigCTAB using anion, thiol absorbing corresponding the displace to acid) -dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic ntonln ih8hdoyunlie{A o 826 No. {CAS 8-hydroxyquinaldine with -nitroaniline ’ nSS TBadwtr twssonta TBofrdamr yrpoi environment hydrophobic amore offered CTAB that shown was it water, and CTAB SDS, in s

naeoe a sdt nlz h loieincnetaini ote andsea in bottled concentration ion fluoride the analyze to used was acetone) in % – 36 p

aoezn nTio -0 o h ulwvlnt eemnto of determination wavelength dual the for X-100 Triton in -azobenzene i o1 to min – }a egn 12.Gad eotdteitreec-respectropho- interference-free the reported Ghaedi [102]. reagent a as 5} – 61 – 4 }wsue o h eemnto fsle naTio -0 micellar X-100 Triton a in silver of determination the for used was 8} 2 – − – 3 Cl < 32

i 9] ielrctlsso ulohlcratoswsue for used was reactions nucleophilic of catalysis Micellar [92]. min – }wsue nasuyb aplet Sarpal by study a in used was 4} – − 22 Br < – }adctoi ufcat 8] nte eisorganic series Another [86]. surfactants cationic and 3} − ‐ aaye ecinwt 1 with reaction catalyzed ≤ NO – 81 3 − – }i D ielri 07[0] h non- The [103]. 2007 in micellar SDS a in 6} 4] hn3,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-3H-indol When [49]. – – iil pcrsoyb aayi acylation catalytic by spectroscopy Visible 81 – 53 – ε – }t rdc h upeaoiedye azoxine purple the produce to 3} iltcmlxfo h ecinwith reaction the from complex violet – .2×10 × 4.72 = }i D ielrsse 9] The [98]. system micellar SDS a in 2}

l eotdtespectrophotometric the reported al. α ‐ bny ixm ( dioxime -benzyl 4

fluoro l safursec probe fluorescence a as al. –

/o.c hc s22 is which cm L/mol. 67 – 59 – }wsue with used was 6} – ‐ }[9.Techro- The [49]. 9} 2,4 ‐ dinitrobenzene. – EGRUYTER DE 85 N – -[( }and 8} E )-2-

% p - Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd ..Tepeec fannoi ufcatas ie rae tblt ihtesse en tbefra least at for stable being system the 420 with at stability occurs greater of maximum gives pH excitation also a The surfactant at hours. nonionic 9-fold, 3 a about of enhanced was presence polyoxyethylene) The of 3.3. chains hydrophilic two by bordered oxypropylene PF and SDSsurfactants X-100 Triton or Brij-35 the nonionic in [114]. fluorescence increased exhibited mercaptoethanol 14933 No. {CAS acid 1-sulfonic dodecyl(trimethyl)azanium or CTAC 20- 112 of to presence No. the 8- {CAS in chloride when the methodforthe enhanced investigated was glycine they dansyl of paper upon thespectrofluorimetric intensity Roth separate rescence by a acids systems In amino micellar [113]. of surfactant determination compared of different ethanol. were figures to systems effects andanalytical compared four enhancement limits, when all fold X-100 Triton pyrene lower detection and for SDS yields, merit CTAC, quantum of of lifetimes, systems fluorescence micellar parameters, in spectral times The 16 to 3 and wavelength from excitation hancement the in 630 shift from wavelength red noted emission a the was in there shift where blue CTAB a and flu- surfactants nonionic the of of ligand variety the expense a between the competition at the occurring discussed that phosphorescence thatthis et and showed Dominguez they enhanced [111]. being surfactant, orescence of thecationic crossing electrostatic some inter-systems For were to structure. wasob- the presence there rigid due in enhancement when more was greater a but quenching in CMC that fluorescence resulting the exhibited complex observed at the that They and systems complex and surfactant Ta. the the Nb solubilize between Al, occurred surfactant that of the interactions did only not cations media when micellar the metal served in solubilization with the for fluorescence derivatives) The had anthracene micelle. constants and another quenching dyes, in reduced azo be is derivatives, 8-hydroxyquinoline to which San seems analyte bound media the 1987 impurities micellar with quenching In in contact the [20]. lifetimes in of enhanced come for solubilization cannot accountable the they factor also ofthe that primary but so orinteraction surfactant, micelle micelle, separate the the a encapsulation of the inside increased inside solubility, ion-pair of dueto part an deactivation just that collisional with not indicate from state re- species reports is excited their fluorescence Some the [110]. collated of surfactants They systems protection the micelles. inmicellar and of the that observed and and complex enhancement complex the fluorescence the of when electrostatic structure for the concurrently isdetected with act sults enhancements can fluorescence interactions maximum isobserved. hydrophobic of idea enhancement and over-all fluorescence and the micelles establishedcan with the when CMCis of concluded surface They the only in accommodated that be complex andconcluded ternary X-100 the Triton surfactant nonionic with fluorescence bium 68412 No. CAS ether, nonylphenyl (40) oxyethylene 4386 selected No. of {CAS determination species. toward (3) organic of analytes, more vita- determination organic is drugs, lanthanide-sensitized of scope (1) micellar-enhanced determination the (4) applications: (2) and and of substances, species (876) tables inorganic organic references several other of includes and number reference any dyes This greater include mins, [20]. a not studies has did and but these applications material et analytical of same Hinze many the by study, enhancement of review catalysis fluorescence some The or of covers analyte. characterization reports the many probe of serveasagood chemistry, been analysis physical had quantitative a would and there of Although part [17]. structure andtheuseof covered as ofmicellar topics attributes the changes inmicroviscosities andother to from CMC 1992cov- point, introduction Krafft like review todetermine media Wandruszka The inmicellar reagents 108]. fluorescence [107, occur that media changes specific in micellar the ers fluorescence of reviews several are There spectroscopy Fluorescence 4.5 phenylfluo- 504 NaN with at and germanium system KCN of as 975 determination No. such spectrophotometric {CAS wastes (2,6,7-trihydroxy-9-phenylxanthen-3-one) toxic The rone, produce [105]. not pollution does environmental complex [104]. and cause reagents 534 oxidative ternary at avoids analysis No.3952-78-1} methods hemoglobin {CAS other for blue method spectrophotometric fluorine new (III)/Alizarin A fluoride/lanthanum the using water GRUYTER DE – td ftefursec fteP-oi ytmi h rsneof2 inthepresence system the Pb-morin of fluorescence the of study A its en- and fluorescence pyrene the of intensity the at looked Hinze and Singh of 1982 in work early The lumogallion using aluminum of determination the in enhancement six-fold a reported Ishibashi 1972 In 0( ooae hc sannoi rbokcplmr opsdo eta yrpoi hi fpoly- of chain hydrophobic central a of composed copolymers triblock nonionic a is which poloxamer (a 20

mwsrpre yDgret Dagar by reported was nm – 25 – ee et Medel – }a h hltn gn obndwt h oincsratn GPLC 9 {poly- 890 CO IGEPAL surfactant nonionic the with combined agent chelating the as 8} – 00 –

}adtezitroi surfactant zwitterionic the and 5} l netgtdadrvee eea lse fmtlceaigaet (flavonols, agents chelating metal of classes several reviewed and investigated al.

– l lofcsdo h niobium the on focused also al. 08 – }mcla ytm.Smlry h yiedrvtv of derivative lysine the Similarly, systems. micellar 5} ’ ehdadtedny hoiepoeue hyfudta h fluo- the that found They procedure. chloride dansyl the and method s

l [106] al.

mwt loecneocrigat495 occurring fluorescence with nm mi ae o600 to water in nm ’ n h ea complex metal the and s – 54 – 4 } 19.San [109].

l nte2008 the in al. – N 17 -dodecyl- – – lumogallion }a rc ocnrtosi D surfactant SDS a in concentrations trace at 7}

muigSSwsrpre,wihunlike which reported, was SDS using nm

mi rtnX10[112]. X-100 Triton in nm – ee et Medel N,N

nylpdao nltclChemistry Analytical of Encyclopedia h oincsratn Genapol surfactant nonionic the % ’ neato ihtemcle for micelles the with interaction s -dimethylammonium-3-propane- –

ataesse na18 paper 1989 a in system tartrate l tde h uoalo nio- lumogallion the studied al.

madtedetection the and nm o -phthaladehyde-2- Pharr 3 htcan that 13 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd aino ibu ihboooma h ev tmsuc fe xgnrmvlwsrpre yKalyana- by reported was removal oxygen after source atom heavy the determi- et as the sundaram for bromoform CTAB with using deriva- phosphorescence its niobium temperature of of room some nation the and micellar 8-hydroxyquinollne for SDS of reagents investigation a complexing The in potential [128]. RTP as atom by tives heavy pineapple the phos- in as determined sensitized thallium RTP, was using agriculture, with system in investigated and,thesub- used (2-(4-thiazoly)-1H- were widely atom [127]. Thiabendazole fungicide drugs heavy analyte a and cyclodextrens illicit a benzimidazole), the media and has micellar licit using that around fluorescence of micelle and concentration series phorescence the the heavy-atom A the about [48]. Because volume intensifies phosphorescence determination [126]. smaller effectively derivatives sequent the far this its in a counter-ion, and yields in carbazole its quantum of species as the later interacting increase and the to [125], concentrates toxic) hydrocarbons micelle is polyaromatic (which of number thallium a or silver of either of cations atom [20]. review his in et Hinze by summarized were removal oxygen of of methods formicelle out Other systems and [123]. in surfactant oxy- in rescence freely of scavenger moves an oxygen atm micelle oxygen as dissolved 1 of Nevertheless, below sulfite quenching 7. sodium pressures the in micelle At 1 in experimentally. a about results found is in which oxygen is concentration micelles, with which oxygen micelles condition higher of a a ratio expect phase, the would gen aqueous one the and in solvents, than organic of core in was than micelle water CTAB have in a early solubility which from Some molecule seconds. states this to triplet of nanoseconds [36]. the time from millisecond due system exit one micellar delay the of order a that time the of indicated the probes anthracene of is study triplet because quenching to phosphorescence on investigations possible of used of was possibilities limits feature This numerous detection unique lifetimes. the low long and The the necessary reaction. despite been the previously limited of had been that has temperatures cryogenic analysis the phosphorescence of use The spectroscopy Phosphorescence 4.6 the as to referred be can This [117]. 1,10- fold containing byXuet 1078 solution to been reviewed X-100-ethanol 61 has aTriton and from in ranging effect pivaloytrifluoroacetone factors cofluorescence by with increased chelated were La, phenanthroline, or Gd flu- Lu, Y, of Eu sensitization of of f the intensities another for Fluorescence of ligands sensitive. organic presence more with The complexed com- [20]. ions of organic analysis actinide orescence and quantification lanthanide immunoassays, utilized including has applications, pounds analytical Various [116]. ether tri- dodecyl of presence (v/v) and absence 20:80 the a in tives in achieved that than better times 20 [20]. No.85 about system {CAS sensitivity solvent PAN, increased ethanol-aqueous 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol, system with micellar ofGa(III) SDS anionic analysis the fluorescence the For be [20]. would of 8-hydroxy-7-iodoquinoline-5-sulfonic surfac- CTAB form anionic complexes molecular an Fluorescent excitable 547 than No. effect. the rather {CAS quenching surfactant is acid nonionic a that or The produce anion cationic ppb. might An a 0.2 which analysis. with of tant the intheenhancement enhancement limit for highest detection factor best the a major a have is be to and that can expected 3.8 surfactant pH of of The pH type a [49]. the significantly at and reduced reported also was was system ions interfering surfactant of similar number a of presence the 0.06 in be to reported was limit 14 CTABwitha S in Red andAlizarin EDTA Zr(IV), complex 3.4 detected of ternary was limit invariousfoods fluorescence 34 acid, detection to the of EDTA,ethylenediaminetetraacetic up with analysis of The accomplished [121]. anoticeable factor was had ofemission a examined by the intensity tetracyclines on different enhancement the effect and between variances studied, structural were Small Tetracyclines tetracyclines. surfactants [120]. some X-100 for used Triton surfactant and the and CPC benzodiazepine Both the Eu both with 1.2 of complexes analyzed the range luminescence nature in when form the psychoactive 2.6 analysis on of of fluorimetric class depending factor their (a increase, for a benzodiazepines factors 6.5 by on enhancement conducted enhanced micellar was provided was study surfactants suppressant similar using A appetite drugs) [119]. an SDS as surfactant anionic used the been in has and metabolite a as

l 14 oeo h al eot fro eprtr hshrsec RP tlzdSSwt heavy with SDS utilized (RTP) phosphorescence temperature room of reports early the of Some [124] al. iel-tblzdro eprtr hshrsec M-T)wsfrtrpre by Kalyanasundaram reported first was (MS-RTP) phosphorescence temperature room Micelle-stabilized a much lower has It in phosphorescence. difficulty major a been has state triplet the of quenching Oxygen with several complexes andsamarium europium ofterbium, intensities fluorescence The epooe 3(-hnlrpn2yaiopoaeirl,CSN.1372-}poue amphetamine produces 16397-28-7} No. CAS {3-(1-phenylpropan-2-ylamino)propanenitrile, Fenproporex Pharr

l n18 19.Te ocue hteetottcadhdohbcfre cigsimultaneously acting forces hydrophobic and electrostatic that concluded They [129]. 1987 in al. – 91

gm [122]. ng/mL – }wt l g n nctosi aincsratn ytm xiie nacmnsin enhancements exhibited systems surfactant cationic in cations Zn and Mg, Al, with 1}

gmL µg − 1 n 3+ 15.A1-odices ntedtriaino lmnmwt morin with aluminum of determination the in increase 10-fold A [115]. otlhshn xd TP)i ielrslto fnona-oxyethylene of solution micellar in (TOPO) oxide -octylphosphine n twsetbihdta h msinwsehne ysurfactants. by enhanced was emission the that established was it and 3+ Sm , – – lc lmn a as h loecnet eoeeven become to fluorescence the cause can element block on xie tts[] Sanz [7]. states excited bound 3+

l [118] al. Dy , 3+ n Tb and 3+ – ntepeec fasrlso cations of surplus a of presence the in tblzdro eprtr phospho- temperature room stabilized – ee et Medel β

l ecieusing describe al. dktn deriva- -diketone EGRUYTER DE – 85 – 8} – Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd iwo ntuetto n nltclmtoooyicuigteueo ielrssesfroln sample online re- for a systems incorporates micellar Silva of by use review [146]. the detection The including and [145]. techniques methodology et pharmaceuticals concentration analytical Sepaniak of and by analysis instrumentation advan- 2012 the of in numerous in view [141], Its and 1997 pharmaceutical, compounds. [144] in including inorganic Khaledi speciation field by and element varied reviewed in organic were reported was usages both negative flow been and for the electroosmotic has tages MEKC biochemistry from the of used carried and use was was environmental, The CTAB SDS clinical, [140]. surfactant The direction cationic separation. opposite the the 19-minute When in electrode. the positive for the 400,000 to to electrode 210,000 between was technique count this allowing SDS using phenols et Terabe chromatography electrokinetic Micellar 4.9 analysis. of method HPLC chemistry green a should of therefore development and the reagents, in of cost use lower antiarrhythmics, considerable and anticonvulsants, solvents of toxic including: be less of urine Micellar production and [139]. the bronchodilators in serum and results in chromatography analgesics inhibitors, drugs reuptake by several serotonin review selective of A antidepressants, analysis HPLC. tricyclic in the solvent for secondary of the surfactant used a of being Esteve elution and gradient theconcentration [138], mimics acolumnat40 1989 separation in Changing a Hinze using [50]. during and efficiency phase mobile with the problems separation in earlier of the chromatographic some overcome helps characteristics and the separation like on solvents, organic other UV effects of an great amounts using small documented of added been Addition The already enhanced [48]. the [50]. has detector also acetophenone that but anionic characteristics systems and separation the surfactant phenol the from only of of not went detection separation is one HPLC form the with when could have in reversed systems it CTAB micellar was was surfactant that it order advantage if cationic elution and that the The not, factor to or [137]. Another ionic SDS molecule was them. surfactant surfactant solute with the a if reacted with system analyte ion-pair micellar the the werean of if times selectivity retention and the The surfactant to 136]. contribute the [135, could HPLC of in aro- concentration use forpolynuclear analysis their the for TLC with upon followed phase was dependent mobile This in the [134]. pesticides and of surfactants [133] use matics the reported first Armstrong 1979 In Chromatography 4.8 this survey. of section analysis injection using flow FAAS the by in determination later later to discussed [49]. steps their used oils preconcentration for lubricating other been cations in some metal has iron and sequester and CPEs method to preparations successfully This antifungal used solvents. in been zinc organic have oils, Surfactants of lubricating and use gasoline the in avoid lead determine and samples water-immiscible effects solubilize ofeasily to [132]. plasma the phenomena: in time observed residence plasmaspectrophotometer.of earlier increased DC and forseveralmetals argon pinch studied acombination thermal ionization, electrode by Penning wasalso three on increased SDS elements, explained effect ionized with was their and effect Bi) enhancement As, Enhancement SDS Sb, Te, [131]. The Sn, the signal Si, surfactants Ge, in nonionic In, Ga, and effect anionic Cu, cationic (Cr, The no while FAAS. or value in depression absorption agents FAAS a small enhancement there the However, cause of as in systems. surfactants number enhancements for aqueous greater exhibited literature a to SDS the has compared surfactant in that increased reported aerosol usually results an mixed are produce been signals have solvents corresponding organic engine. the chamber the of spray characteristics to and wear the procedure the droplets common in determine a to that oil is known engine it in is rings metals and It of ofanalysis bearings analysis replacement the methods for needs solvents engine organic andemission of an FAAS, use if spectroscopy, decide To absorption studied. atomic less flame been has in solvents organic of use The spectroscopy Atomic 4.7 [130]. scavenger an oxygen as sulfite sodium with and CTAB of presence complex the acid in gallium(III)-7-iodo-8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic {Ferron} et a Liu Similarly, determine phosphorescence. to temperature phosphorescence room temperature micelle-stabilized secure to essential seem GRUYTER DE oecnitn plctoshv enrpre hntesratnshv enue o mliyn agents emulsifying for used been have surfactants the when reported been have applications consistent More

l is eotdteueo ielrssesi 94i h lcrkntcsprto of14different separation intheelectrokinetic 1984 in systems ofmicellar use the reported first al. – oeoet Romero

l na21 eiwatceloe tmcla iudchromatography liquid micellar at looked article review 2016 a in al. ’ ape oicuewtrislbeseis h hoeia plate theoretical The species. insoluble water include to samples s n poao,hv enrpre ohave to reported been have -propanol, – iil rfursec HPLC fluorescence or Visible

l 12,i oiooy[143], toxicology in [142], al.

l sdroom used al. Pharr

°C, 15 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd hndtrie yavreyo nltclmtosicuigfursec,vsbeadfaeaoi absorp- atomic flame and were ions visible metal fluorescence, Extracted including [157]. methods subject analytical the of on it extrac- variety review lower traditional a a iodide to by written and compared which determined has urea chemistry surfactants while and then greener other work point and or this cloud volumes pioneered salts the smaller Watanabe increases of requires tions. sulfate addition ions of [23]. metal the addition the product of by The Extraction of changed [152]. [22]. be bottom CMC analysis can the the final happens on alter before CPE also others desired may a and be layer now which may top has layer at analyte the rich temperature the on surfactant The where appear viscous same surfactants the the Some of layer. centrifuging Adjustment layer. micellar or the the in gravity surfactants by into zwitterionic completed concentrated or be layer been lower can the separation surfactants) in zwitterionic The surfactants layer. raisethe of nonionic instance dissolved upper with has the occurs species in lowered separation the (or phase After analyzed point then value. be cloud and CMC make the to its above and solution than bath temperature light to a begreater surfactant of in Add temperature scattering will steps. a concentration easy final cause several its surfactants requires such of process making occurs The number temperature cloudy. large point appear cloud the solution This where the phases. range two temperature into narrow zwit- separation some a a and over nonionic and several turbidity of solutions a aqueous develop temperature, surfactants in changes terionic [155]. Upon analysis 156]. of 23, [22, area CPE this as preconcentration known to and guides comprehensive separation are extraction 2002 and in [154] Stalikas pre- by 2004 and analysis in water. extraction metal Ferrera on in in Reviews by surfactants [153]. samples 2005 of environmental in determination Paleologos reviewed in Hinze and the pollutants but [83] them for 1979 of used in discussion a these soluble been bypass of shall is also we some solvents that organic has then use or and procedures method xylene, these ion-pair This of chloroform, the many [152]. Because form tetrachloride, be to surfactant carbon may used nonionic (in been surfactants a also extracted cationic have in and ions so species Other agents [49]. these analyzed chelating of with and other determination dichloroethane) ion-pairs spectrophotometric with close the complexes form by separation anionic followed to the form achieve then used to is metals liquids this Some organic Often species. in solutions. soluble the aqueous are from that ions ion-pairs metal close of form to used been have Surfactants Extractions 4.11 [151] the byvoltammetry cyclic including [150] films characterized reviewed hexacyanoferrate are and nickel oxide of titanium CTAB and reported oxides first they derivatized work their generated hexacyanoferrates, being metal ion ferrocinium electrochemicallywith the the of of case solubilization the [49]. the in 102-54-5} for discussed No. allows as {Cas nitrobenzene it transfer ferrocene of electron because studies from the with used allow and been [49] to also media titrant has micellar generated cationic media in micellar radical wasattributed The anion behavior the [149]. this for of and reactions solubility fluorenone reduction and increased of phthalonitrile the course reactions for to the case reversible in the evince formed was radicals can Such anion compounds. systems organic stabilize micellar some can Micelles of solvents. solubility normal in increased seen the not studies no voltammetry was in 2,2 cyclic there tetrathiofulvane, shift In analytes a of some [49]. cause analysis for may but the micelle shift for negative the and a of has change microenvironment potential half-wave the the indicators Generally, analyte. acid/base potential. the in reaction and is surfactant the pKa the electrode the the to on of depending alteration results process 3006 of the diffusion variety Like No. a the produce intermediates, {CAS Experiments presence. reaction sulfosuccinate their the by sodium and altered surfactants in dihexyl of anthraquinone MA, ability of solubilization Aerosol determination the polarographic surfactant the the report to using media Proske water micelle 1952 electrodes of In both power [48]. Hg (by analyte solubilization electroactive transfer and an the electron of Pt of used duetochanges potential half-wave rate on electrode apparent the the hemimicelles and and arrangement, inhibition), ofthe or double-layer and bilayers the surface acceleration alter adsorbed loweringof can of surfactant on the the adsorbed Specific evidence The show [147]. [148]. including discussed of the surfactant behavior, media Results onelectrode organized potential. these and reorganizing in have historical of surfactants a c 16 natraiegenetato ehdue h lu on ftesratn teft fetteseparation, the effect to itself surfactant the of point cloud the uses method extraction green alternative An et Vittal by 2006 from survey literature recent more a In Pharr ′ bs13dtilldn) nCA hr a oiieshift positive a was there CTAB in -bis(1,3-dithiolylidene),

al. which includes the modification of electrodes modification the includes which al. ocnrto forganic of concentration – 15 – }[4] Besides [146]. 3} EGRUYTER DE Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd al 1: Table analogous of monolayers charged in indicator lipoid-pH the by measured density. potentials charge the to shift comparable 100, but different for CTAB. The electrical potentials for SDS micelles ( for SDS potentials their The electrical In [160]. shifts CTAB. pKa for apparent different the but theindicator for 100, responsible that were polarity concluded of to neutral, they change findings pKa a substituents the and/or chain with potential paraffinic made electrical long were the of comparisons and means micelles by cationic incorporated and theory were anionic, electrostatic that simple dye, the aminocoumarin support an et reported and constants Fernandez (nonionic) dielectric [159]. 5.20 and low phenomenon (anionic), the apparent this 6.63 the and (cationic), for but 3.67 data water to the in surfactant 4.95 of of of type Examination pKa the [50]. a with has changes tooccur red system reported methyl micellar later example a For also in were 159]. 1. pKa [49, onacid Table pKavalues well as in the apparent systems of surfactants in micelle given nonionic shifts are in effect significant substitutions The the [39]. greener solvent solvent CTAB on usea as of reported such to surfactants examples Hartley 1934 Some the opportunity as used. early normally one As solvents in offers environment This non-aqueous micellar indicator. a the in color titrated or than be potentiometric can that a compounds media organic either non-aqueous solubilize using a to water in surfactant titrated the be to of have ability would normally the that use that investigations numerous been have There Titrations 4.12 in the surfactant- attained factors extracted enhancement 95 were to fluorescence thiabendazole The and 1.2 samples. were napropamide soil phase pesticides rich and the water 9043-30-5} from No. analyzed {CAS and 80 X Genapol surfactant PCB andHinzehas fungicides, (pesticides, Quina (3) Compounds by and Environmental PAH Analytes, and Biomaterials/Clinical review Organic of of A CPE Preconcentration [158]. involves Recent and/or (2) CPE Extraction Parameters, involving of Bordier Extraction work Some publications fora the (1) of tables: quantity useful incidences following several is several vast proteins of membrane The efficient [23]. more purification samples and the environmental methods and been extraction organic have traditional producesfewer detection of This method than ionization variety expensive prior flame less preconcentration compounds. or is important capture and and ofenvironmentally electron preparation wastes an thequantification sample and for a chromatography as used gas effectively technique or HPLC CPE by the analysis Using to others. and spectroscopy tion GRUYTER DE n t eiaie sn we-0 TB P n D.Drc irtosi TBhdgo orltoswith correlations [164]. good acids weak had CTAB the in for titrations counterparts Direct titrations SDS. non-aqueous and the CPC CTAB, Tween-80, using derivatives its made and was study A {( [163]. acid titrimetry iopanoic to de- acid-base by compared the for systems results et detection micellar Gerakis sluggish endpoint cationic gave by potentiometric in electrodes and barbiturates the visual some that both of indicator, using termination red reported phenol Staroscik [162]. HCl, indicators with visual SDS in amines and tor, ye fcmonsttae nmcla ytm 4]Nnauossletrpae ymcla ytm[161] system micellar by replaced solvent Non-aqueous amines chain Long [49] systems micellar in titrated compounds of Types Halophenols bases weak soluble Sparingly acids weak soluble Sparingly Sulfonamides acids Benzoic acids Fatty By combining CPE with fluorescence analysis one can achieve low detection limits. Using thenonionic limits. lowdetection canachieve one analysis fluorescence with CPE combining By newo bevdfrtettaino abxlcaisi TBwt aH hnlhhli indica- phenolphthalein NaOH, with CTAB in acids carboxylic of titration the for observed Underwood ’

eeraie [20]. realized were % hnl n tes n ueosapiain nteratce[23]. article their in applications numerous and others) and phenols s oprsno ovnsue nnnauosttain n ielrsystems. micellar and titrations non-aqueous in used solvents of Comparison

l sn ircmue-otoldttain fpamcuia opud:aprn naproxen, aspirin, compounds: pharmaceutical of titrations microcomputer-controlled using al. RS --(-mn-,,-ridpey)ehlbtni cd A o 68-}adbnocacid benzoic and 96-83-3} No. CAS acid, )-2-[(3-Amino-2,4,6-triiodophenyl)methyl]butanoic – . o hs w etcds eeto iisls hn0.2 than less limits Detection pesticides. two these for 2.0

l sdtodfeetfursetp niaos a hydroxycoumarin pHindicators, fluorescent different two used al. ’ hscllcto n eairwr iia nSSadTio X- Triton and SDS in similar were behavior and location physical s yiie M,ehln imn,adothers and diamine, ethylene DMF, Pyridine, DMF methanol/benzene, Acetone, DMF methanol/benzene, Acetone, DMF CS DMF methanol/benzene, Acetone, ctcai,doae ctntieadothers and acetonitrile dioxane, acid, Acetic 2 ctntie methanol acetonitrile, , – aeidctr tdigsm cationic some studying indicators base – ’ 134 fauossltost eemn if determine to solutions aqueous of s

V n TB(+148 CTAB and mV)

μ / n eoeyrtso equal of rates recovery and g/L

V aea have mV) Pharr 17 ’ s, Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd eemnto yFA yteadto fHl h nacmn atr eebten1. n 03 and 20.3, and 15.1 between were factors enhancement The mini HCl. wool of glass addition or with the cotton chelated by a were FAAS onto ions by concentrated metal subsequently determination The were system. and FIA X-114 a ton in 1147 preconcentration No. CPE CAS after {1-[2-(2-thiazolyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthalenol, TAN, FAAS by cadmium and lead h raitdpoutocre a eandi lwcl ildwt D,otdcliae iiagelcoated silica ODS,octadecylsilane, 0.5 with 0.14 of filled 8 fluorescence. limit cell with induced detection flow photochemical a a had and in SDS system retained with was spectroscopy occurred phase product solid irradiated inten- a The of using fluorescence limit waters and detection environmental products a in 74223-64 with reaction No. CAS magnitude the ester, samples.Both of methyl solubilize tap water acid orders yl)amino]-oxomethyl]sulfamoyl}benzoic spiked to two in over levels calibration CMC linear 0.33 their exhibited oftheherbicides FIA which at utilized enhancement, used residues sity species were herbicide UV irradiated CTAC phenylurea the and the of SDS of analysis detection The fluorescence investigations. and FIA for approaches principle 5 as documented was calibration 0.7 linear of and limit achieved, was 125 of factor 148 enrichment No. CAS (diethylcarbamothioyl)sulfanide, {sodium diethyldithiocarbamate 18 with method witha20 similar a an 1.0 using with after elution was analyzed range calibration were spectrometry linear chromium absorption adsorbed The total atomic is and ligand injection organic flow (III) by the chromium por- followed and fashion external phase this the 134 the No. In becomes to {CAS now surface. 8-hydroxyquinoline character tail alumina hydrophobic hydrophobic treated a the the giving and onto particles alumina, alumina solid the the of to tion attraction charge for10 by by analysis bonded mixing 15 an is HCl for before for ligand basis organic with 2 the the to with been pH has step the surfactant- preconcentration a fine-tuning and on separation immobilized agent a et complexation as Ahmadi a acts of column use The alumina analyte. coated an of preconcentration and extractions 1.5 of 10 limit detection 1.0 a of range with agent complexation metal {3-Methylamino- {2,6,7-trihydroxy-9-( B, salicyl-fluorone azure using of solution thereduction on of copper effect 647 catalytic 531 the No. CAS using chloride, created 7-dimethyl-aminophenothiazin-5-ium was (II) copper of 15 a of need 510 the without 13311 Other No. formed reactions. CAS was for rescorcinol, catalyst {4-(2-pyridylazo) PAR, a using and 20 (II) solvent nickel of 612 a times at as waiting spectroscopy act and to visible baths systems by heating micellar had measured of peroxide was benzoyl use catalyst for the inacne a methods of as example (IV) peroxide typical of benzoyl cerium another including is analysis system injection surfactant already existing flow SDS the The a employs [169]. using which analysis flour resin, the and a for using cream Brij-35 preconcentration, in in-line reaction with lumogallion analysis [165 injection inthe literature flow by ter reviews beenperiodic have automa- for there used been determinations, has andchromophore analytical ap- method solvent different the The low many through throughput. of passing of the parameters, sample tion before high coil and stream reagents, easy reaction variation a of a into conservation FIA include in injected concentrations, com- of mixed is of analysis are sample benefits method they a The and This detector. it chromophore propriate In the methods. [165]. includes detection andHansen that numerous solvent with of by Ruzicka chromatography of reported speed the first bines was FIA, Analysis, Injection Flow analysis injection Flow 4.13 18 – – – h eycee s fCEhsas enculdwt I 19.Slaet Silva [179]. FIA with coupled been also has CPE of use clever very The the as fluorescence and chemiluminescence used has pesticides and herbicides pollutants, An FAAS. of by analysis analyzed The and column alumina coated SDS the on immobilized agent complexation the as 5} accomplish will that developed been have 500 methods at analysis FIA spectrophotometric in FIA reported a is for surfactants SDS of and use acid interesting sulfuric very in A agent complexing the as 6} 630 at method spectrophotometric FIA a by analyzed was seawater in Zinc and (II) cobalt of analysis FIA the in micelles of abilities catalytic the illustrated X-100 Triton surfactant The in seawa- ofaluminum determination fluorometric on measures and Resing by one the is paper typical A m ih50 amounts with nanogram nm, of determination the for method spectrophotometric FIA kinetic Catalytic [171]. nm 175 – 0.92 Pharr

MSSbtenrn.Tesz fteijcinvlm f1000 of volume injection the of size The runs. between SDS mM

gL[178]. µg/L

gL[7] h rala ebcd esluo-ehl {2-{[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2- metsulfuron-methyl, herbicide broadleaf The [177]. mg/L

gL[176]. µg/L l,wihivle ounpeaainb digSSjs eo t M o1.5 to CMC its below just SDS adding by preparation column involves which al., – 12.0 –

1600 gLadadtcinlmto 0.027 of limit detection a and µg/L

gLa h airto ag n 9.2 and range calibration the as µg/L N,N,N,N

i. itrdadaddt h oun h no edgopofthe surfactant group head anion The thecolumn. to added and filtered min., -tetramethyl- – 31 – 100 –

i o ae ah eeto a ihavsbesetohtmtrat spectrophotometer visible a with was Detection bath. water hot min gL h oi hs lto a iha30 a with was elution phase solid The µg/L. }a h moiie rai egn naSScae lmn column alumina SDS-coated a on reagent organic immobilized the as 6}

gLaddtcinlmtws0.16 was limit detection and µg/L p peyeeimn,Wurster -phenylenediamine,

o gLepoig15dpeyticraoe{A o 60 No. {CAS 1,5-diphenylthiocarbazone employing µg/L hdoyhnl--looe A o 3569 No. CAS -hydroxyphenyl)-3-fluorone,

i.Tesml a ahdwt ae hnmixed then water with washed was sample The min.

gL[7] eddtriainwsrpre nthe in reported was determination Lead [173]. µg/L

gLa h eeto ii [172]. limit detection the as µg/L – 55 – – 56 }b ufd naCA ufcatsse at system CTAB surfactant a in sulfide by 5} – – 52 } hc irtdt h ielso Tri- of micelles the to migrated which 4}, – } nwihteclrdmtlcomplex metal colored the which in 9}, –

Lrgltdteaayia ag of range analytical the regulated µL 40 ’

gL[7] ivrwsdetermined was Silver [175]. ng/L egn CSN.670-} and 637-01-4}, No. {CAS reagent s

i [170]. min – } ufnlra a analyzed was sulfonylurea, a 6},

mi TBbrxbuffered borax CTAB a in nm l eusee n analyzed and sequestered al. –

column and flushed off for flushed and column tao ouini HCl. in solution ethanol % –

methanol % 100

gLwt detection a with µg/L

fauia then alumina, of g – ae solvent water – 82 EGRUYTER DE

m[174]. nm – }a the as 2} – 168].

nm – – Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd ehd fe e n xiigrsac ssfrtoesm hmcl ihwihw ahourhands, wewash 2: 2). Table (Table which laboratory with chemistry 1970s. Otheranalytical the the outside chemicals and same since inside those day every for active use uses we have been that research however,some and explored, andclothes exciting being are spectroscopy new and UV-Visible chemistry offer of analytical methods as, fluorescence Allaspects written was of research. such it after fields right field date active micelles of very at out look still be comprehensive would this A and catalyticfor encyclopedia purposes. separate environmental or a and require solubilization, cost would for chemistry the analytical to on Seeing in go solvents organic chemistry. to based of system replacement analytical methods solvent the a new and green micelles enhancement, into achieve make both of insight to opportunity give The utilized systems. also surfactant be of can properties works can some system elucidate they and micellar how surfactants a of of how uses understanding practical many our the to in introduction background an give to attempted has chapter This Conclusions 5 [184]. (III) diperiodatoargentate with analyte the of used aCTABsurfactant reaction fluids the and and biological system preparations in pharmaceutical gemifloxacin of detection nescence L- of determination KMnO the Luminol in [182]. recently lu- 521-31-3} chemical used No. the was CAS and {5-amino-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione, CPE luminol using of preconcentration oxidation iron combines and minescent that brought down gold, silver, samples were of environmental the determination limits ultrasensitive in an on nanoparticles in Thedetection oxide bis(2,4,6- levels based concentration and femtomolar [181]. was and oxidation forbenzo[ghi]perylene picomolar the method peroxide to 41.3 The hydrogen and benzo[k]fluoranthene acetonitrile. of sodium for pure reaction 38.5 using 1165 using by the No. achieved depressed from {CAS temperature was resulted trichlorophenyl)oxalate point Elution that cloud phase. product its mobile chemiluminescence had the that phase in mini- filled CPE sulfate cotton X-114 A Triton system. detection collected chemiluminescence column peroxoxalate the using benzo[a]pyrene of mination 4.5 were limits detection GRUYTER DE rj35 Brij (577-11-7) Aerosol-OT Aerosol-22 No.) (CAS Surfactant hoie(6004-24-6) chloride CPC (140-72-7) bromide CPB 96 Brij Tween-80 Tween-20 (79728-63-5) chloride trimethylammonium CTAC (9036-06-0) bromide trimethylammonium CTAB rtnX-114 Triton X-100 Triton (151-21-3) sulfate SDS Cetylpyridinium , Cetylpyridinium , oimdodecyl Sodium , 4 Cetyl , Cetyl , ufcatpoete 2 ,4,15 186]. 185, 48, 4, [2, properties Surfactant (9002-92-0) (9009-91-0) htatda nacmn atr o h hmlmnsec eeto 13.TeFAadchemilumi- and FIA The [183]. detection chemiluminescence the for factors enhancement as acted that (9005-65-6) (93906-96-8) (3401-73-8) AOT , 98-38 537 650 (9081-83-8) (9036-19-5)

μ / o bad0.75 and Pb for g/L 1225 444.56 653 Aggregation g/mole GMM 358.01 402.47 709 1310 1228 320.0 364.5 288.38 – 91 – } h nihetfcosrcutda 02frbenzo[a]pyrene, for 40.2 as recounted factors enrichment The 9}. hrxn npamcuia rprtosaogwt TBand CTAB with along preparations pharmaceutical in thyroxine 40 number 18-55 58 84 170 140

μ / o d[8] iia ytmhdbe sdfrtedeter- the for used been had system similar A [180]. Cd for g/L . [9] 3.2 [8] 0.70 0.09 Formula mMolar CMC .0[11] 0.90 [1] 0.94 .2[6] 0.12 .5 [5] 0.059 .1 [5] 0.012 [3] 1.3 [3] 0.92 .3[12] 0.23 [11] 8.2 C C C HO(CH C C (OC C [(C (C C C C C 20 26 12 21 21 58 18 8 8 12 16 H H 16 H H H H H H H H H 2 17 17 H H 37 43 25 38 38 114 37 25 33 C C 33 O NO O(CH NBr NCl -C SO 4 )N(CH O 6 6 ) 2 )N(CH H H 20 7 CH 6 26 NaS 4 H OH 16 4 4 Na . . O(CH (OC H H 9 Na 2 2 O O) 2 2 CH O O 3 5 4 3 ) 2 - 10 S 3 ) H 3 Br 2 2 C Cl O) CH 4 18 ) 10 23 H OH 2 H 35 O) Pharr 7.5 H 19 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd 3]MresF,VrovnJ.Charge JW. Verhoeven FM, Martens [35] steady the on micelles of effect Chem The JW. Am Petrich J K, solutions. Das micellar KD, ionic Ashby in [34] arenes neutral of solubilization of aspects static and Dynamic JK. Thomas F, Grieser M, Almgren [33] Excited K. Bhattacharyya and SK, SDS Pal of D, systems Mandal micelle [32] mixed and single of analysis Fluorescence EH. Thompson JA, Whiles PJ, Waller SW, Suljak and KK, properties Karukstis solvent interfacial [31] the both of determination the for probe spectroscopic single A TW. Healy F, Grieser CJ, the Drummond of investigation [30] spectroscopic resonance magnetic proton and Absorption L. Patterson PS, Shih GA, Infante EJ, Fendler JH, Fendler [29] Al M, Novo permeability L, the Piñeiro affecting [28] factors systems micellar ionic aqueous in quenching fluorescence pyrene of Dynamics JK. Thomas M, Grätzel fluorescence pyrene [27] by microenvironments in hydrophobicity the of Estimation S. Mitaku T, Hayakawa M, Nomura S, Ishido H, radiation Itoh on [26] charge and structure of Effect JK. applica- Thomas their [25] and fluorescence monomer pyrene in intensities band vibronic on effects Environmental JK. Thomas K, Kalyanasundaram [24] Surfactant WL. Hinze FH, Quina [23] surfactant of review critical A E. relationships. Pramauro empirical WL, some Hinze micellization: [22] and point cloud point, Krafft the to relation its and 2008;9:16-110. structure Chem Surfactant Anal J. Encycl Sjöblom assemblies. T, organized Gu in [21] Fluorescence Sect WL. Rep Hinze Annu A, applications. Balouch their N, and Memon Surfactants [20] 2 DG. Marangoni EN, Stasiuk LL, Schramm [19] Sanz MD, 1992;23(3):187 Garcia Chem. [18] Anal Rev Crit solutions. micellar pho- of by Luminescence concentration RV. Wandruszka micelle [17] critical the of determination the for method fluorescence New M. Akashi Y, Nakatsuji T, Kida Y, sul- Nakahara dodecyl [16] sodium of characterization luminescent laboratory: student modern The BW. Williams L, Lefkowitz K, laser Johnson A K, form Goodling micellar [15] in and state solid the in 2014;35(12):1774 Technol. surfactants Sci of Dispersion state J conformational overview. The an JK. surfactant: Thomas gemini K, of Kalyanasundaram aspects [14] cmc and Sci. micellization Interface Unique Colloid R. J Tyagi V, solution. Singh aqueous [13] in behavior association the on group spacer the of effect surfactants: (gemini) Dimeric R. Zana [12] self of class new a surfactants: Gemini CA. Littau FM, 1998;1(4):547 Menger Deterg. [11] Surfactants J surfactants. Gemini DJ. Tracy 2009;2(1):181 MJ, Materials. Rosen surfactants. [10] detergent of biodegradation Anaerobic E. Jelen U, Merrettig-Bruns [9] excimer Intramolecular M. Goldenberg C, Behrens J, Emert 82(26):2805 [8] 1978; Chem. Phys J structures. Radiation amphiphile JK. other Thomas and [7] micelles of structure and Dynamics GE. Aniansson [6] toward lipids and surfactants of contribution the on perspective A N. Takaishi K, Urata 1983. [5] Hall, 1984. and Press, Chapman Academic NY: FL: York, Orlando, New Surfactants. biology. TF. Tadros and [4] pharmacy chemistry, their 1978. systems Sons, Surfactants AT. & Florence Wiley D, John Atwood NY: [3] York, New phenomena. interfacial and Surfactants MJ. Rosen [2] 1 probe fluorescent hydrophobic the with micelles ionic of Interaction SU. Dalsager HN, Singh KS, Birdi [1] References 978 isbn (2017), Gruyter De Processes. Chemical 2. Green Benvenuto, in: available also is article This Acknowledgment 20 J model. kinetic systems micellar aqueous in solubilized molecules hydrophobic of decay Luminescence JK. Thomas M, PP, Gratzel Infelta [36] 1981;85(13):1773 3 1979;101(2):279 Soc. 1996;100(26):11125 Chem. Phys J DTAB. 1986;81:95 Soc. Chem Discuss Faraday membranes. lipid model of potential surface electrostatic 1975;97(1):89 Soc. Chem Am J solutions. micellar aqueous in benzophenone and acetophenone of environment 1973;95(21):6885 Soc. Chem Am J micelles. of N measurements: 1977;99(7):2039 Soc. Chem Am J systems. micellar of studies in tion 1999;38(11):4150 Res. Chem 1993;24(2):133 Chem. Anal Rev Crit 1992;64(1):39 Surf. Colloids 2005;21(15):6688 Langmuir. derivatives. monoazacryptand tosensitive 1994;71(1):A8. Educ. Chem J properties. solution micellar fate 1976;80(13):1462 Chem. Phys J study. scattering 2002;248(2):203 2001;4(2):191 Deterg. Surfactants J tential. 1979;83(21):2733 Chem. Phys J hsCe.1974;78(2):190 Chem. Phys 39(11),1906 2000, Edition International Chemie Angewandte surfactants. Gemini JS. Keiper and FM, Menger – ehlnoei qeu ei.Aa hm 1997;69(10):1925 Chem. Anal media. aqueous in methylindole Pharr – – – 1777. ee .Dye A. Medel 220. – β – – – 291. – nue ecin nognzdasmle.Ce e.1980;80(4):283 Rev. Chem assemblies. organized in reactions induced cyguoiemcle.JPy hm 1996;100(21):9047 Chem. Phys J micelles. octylglucoside ofiW loecneeiso fprn nsratn ouin.AvClodItraeSi 2015;215:1 Sci. Interface Colloid Adv solutions. surfactant in pyrene of emission Fluorescence W. Soufi – – – 195. 46. 4168. – – 2737. – ufcatitrcin:arve.Tlna 1986;33(3):255 Talanta. review. a interactions: surfactant eitdcodpitetatos nevrnetlybng lentv eaainapoc.IdEng Ind approach. separation alternative benign environmentally an extractions: point cloud mediated – – 177. rnfrcmlxto nmcla ouin.Wtrpntaiiyo iels hsChem. Phys J micelles. of penetrability Water solutions. micellar in complexation transfer – 11132. – – 200. – tt rtntase f1 of transfer proton state 6889. – 1473. – – eitdpaesprtos(cloud separations phase mediated nue ecin nmcla ytm.AcCe e.1977;10(4):133 Res. Chem Acc systems. micellar in reactions induced – omn rbso qeu iels mCe o.1979;101(3):771 Soc. Chem Am J micelles. aqueous of probes forming – sebigmlcls mCe o.1993;115(22):10083 Soc. Chem Am J molecules. assembling – – 1930. tt n time and state – 2044. – – ahhli iels hsCe .1998;102(48):9710 A. Chem Phys J micelles. in naphthol 6695. – 554. – 9053. – eovdfursec fidl,1 indole, of fluorescence resolved “ re Chemistry Green – – 215. 264. – on xrcin) hoyadapplications. and theory extractions): point – 299. “ C ” – 106. Py hm.2003;99:3 Chem). (Phys – – anilino 206. ” rsn ttsadftr po- future and states present : – 20. – – 8 95. – naphthalenesulfonate. – – 88. 2808 ehlnoe and methylindole, – – xie Raman excited 3 – – – 09 and 10090 48. 11 – – EGRUYTER DE 138. 2. – – 9714. 044487 – 772. – 1792. – Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd 7]EPA nonylphenol [72] nonylphenol, sulphonates, alkylbenzene linear of behavior and Occurrence W. Giger A, Marcomini S, Tech- Capri PH, Sci Environ Brunner system. [71] sediment/aqueous a in phenanthrene and surfactant nonionic of Distribution RG. Luthy Z, Adeel DA, Edwards [70] Hernández [69] Hernández [68] 1990;21:251 Chemosphere. sulphonate. benzene alkyl linear of assessment safety Terrestrial E. Matthijs MS, Holt J, JP, Waters Mieure [67] sludge of composting and drying treatment, sewage during sulfonate) alkylbenzene (linear LAS of Elimination C. Rico D, Prats BF, Ruiz [66] nonylphenol nonylphenol, alkylbenzenesulphonates, linear of behaviour and Occurrence 1993;12:977 W. Chem. Giger Toxicol A, Environ environment. Marcomini S, the Capri in PH, sulfonate Brunner alkylbenzene [65] linear of Fate RA. Rapaport WS, Eckhoff DC, McAvoy [64] in alkylbenzenesulfonate linear surfactant the of Biodegradation JA. Field RL, Smith LB, Barber TE, Sawyer KM, Radakovich CJ, Krueger Technol. [63] Sci Environ materials. sediment on alkylbenzenesulfonates linear of Sorption Res. BJ. Agric Brownawell W, J Zhang surfactants. H, by Chen enhanced EDTA JC, with Westall [62] soils in metals heavy of efficiency Washing H. Chen M, Ma J, Yuan H, Zhan Y, Jiang [61] S Moon SO, Kim [60] et DF, Shams GS, Khan MN, Nadagouda A, Munir Chem. S, Cosmet Shahzad Soc A, J Shah electrode. [59] surfactant a using surfactants cationic or anionic of analysis Quantitative DC. Toro I, Mai HH, Oei [58] 2006;32(3):417 Int. Environ environment. the in Namie products Z, Polkowska degradation E, their Olkowska and [57] surfactants of 2000;1508(1 effects Acta. and Biophys behavior Biochim Fate, environment. GG. the Ying in [56] surfactants of biodegradation The MN. Jones MJ, Scott [55] 2000 Press, University Cambridge UK: . Cambridge, May12 industry. 12. petroleum May the 2006 in Sons, applications & and Wiley fundamentals John Surfactants: NJ: Hoboken, LL. applications. Schramm and [54] fundamentals suspensions: and 1983;2:105 foams Chem. Emulsions, Toxicol Environ LL. surfactants. Schramm cationic [53] for assessment 1975. Press, safety Academic Aquatic V. York: Wee New M, systems. Lewis micromolecular [52] and micellar in 1990;21(4):257 Catalysis Chem. EJ. Fendler Anal JH, Rev Fendler Crit chemistry. [51] analytical in 1985;169:1 Micelles Acta. JG. Chim Dorsey Anal GL, assemblies. McLntire molecular [50] organized of applications Analytical E. Pramauro E, Pelizzetti [49] 52nd Sect. Proc. Surfactants. Cline Chem. [48] Solution chemistry. analytical in systems micellar 2015;17(2):644 and surfactant Chem. Green of media. Use editors. micellar KL, in Mittal catalysis WL.. in advances Hinze Recent [47] A. Scarso G, Strukul from G, transfer Sorella electron La solution [46] micellar aqueous and alcoholic in phenothiazine of photoionization Laser M. Grätzel G, Beck SA, Alkaitis [45] non the Katusin of [44] catalysis micellar and step limiting P. Rate Filho Berci H, Chaimovich CTAB IM, with Cuccovia micelles MJ, mixed Politi in ER, Triboni ester [43] dye anionic an of kinetics hydrolysis 1975;97(21):6019 Soc. the Chem on counterions Am competing J study. and kinetic reacting surfactants of cationic Effect and RL. Reeves dyes [42] anionic from micelles triphenyl- mixed of of fading Nature alkaline RL. the Reeves of [41] studies rate Reaction I. micelles on or in occurring reactions Organic E. Grunwald EFJ, Duynstw [40] long of effect The GS. Hartly [39] self of properties physicochemical excited The of CJ. rate Drummond the F, Grieser on [38] micelles and solvent of effect The CJ. Marzzacco [37] GRUYTER DE 7]Sae ,Giys ,JfesnB atelE etrJ.Nnlhnli h niomn:aciia eiwo curne ae oiiyand toxicity fate, occurrence, on review critical a environment: the in Nonylphenol JN. Lester E, Cartmell B, Jefferson B, Guieysse A, Soares [73] cessed:July2016. https://www.epa.gov/ground at: Available 003 mono 1994;28:1550 nol. 2010;39(4):1298 Qual. Environ J pH. and ratio, soil/solution concentration, surfactant of effects factant: 2011;159(3):809 Pollut. Environ 262. and sludge water, waste in 1989. contaminants Science, Organic Applied editors. Elsevier G, London: Angeletti sediment. I, Temmerman D, Quaghebeur In: processes. amending soil and mono 3961. sewage 1999;33(18):3110 119 2006;25 259 2001;125 2016;116(10):6042 1991;42(5):309 2011;111(9):5667 . Mar23 23. Mar 1979;79 Symp., Sci. Surf. Colloid 1975;97(20):5723 Soc. Chem Am J acceptors. ion metal to states triplet 1978;100(6):1679 Soc. Chem Am 2003;16(6):311 J Chem. complexes. Org Phys J naphthalimide. 8 1, butyl n N nitro 4 in thiols by substitution nucleophilic 1975;97(21):6025 Soc. Chem Am J bromide]. [hexadecyltrimethylammonium 1959;81(17):4540 Soc. Chem Am J salts. detergent of presence the in indicators sulfonphthalein and dyes methane 1934;30:444 1988;20:5580 Chem. Phys J techniques. probe spectroscopic ramn nwseaes nio n.2008;34(7):1033 Int. Environ wastewaters. in treatment – athe FA&PO rnigWtrHat dioisU niomna rtcinAec a.Jl 06 P 800 EPA 2016. July May. Agency Protection Environmental US Advisories Health Water Drinking PFOS & PFOA factsheet – – – oeL,HbraJ,Dre G h micelle The JG. Dorsey JG, Habarta LJ, Love n oypeo itoyae nswg n eaesug ramn.WtrRs 1988;22(12):1465 Res. Water treatment. sludge sewage and sewage in diethoxylates nonylphenol and – n oypeo itoyae nswg n eaesug ramn.WtrRs 1988;22:101 Res. Water treatment. sludge sewage and sewage in diethoxylates nonylphenol and – otmntdgonwtr oprsno ouneprmnsadfil rcrtss nio c eho.1998;32(24):3954 Technol. Sci Environ tests. tracer field and experiments column of comparison a groundwater: contaminated ae ,Wn ,Toa K h feto ielrpaeo h tt n yaiso oeectdsaecag transfer charge state excited some of dynamics and state the on phase micellar of effect The JK. Thomas M, Wong B, Razem – – − – − oin D,Pñ ,Mnoac D ees fmtl rmmetal from metals of Release MD. Mingorance A, Peña MDC, Soriano oin D,DgyeF mlesE ehnsso nacdmblsto ftaemtl yaincsratnsi soil. in surfactants anionic by metals trace of mobilisation enhanced of Mechanisms E. Smolders F, Degryse MDC, Soriano 450. 123. – 272. 316. – – – 5700. – 3118. ,KmK.Rmvlo ev easfo ol sn nacdeetoiei olpoesn.WtrArSi Pollut. Soil Air Water processing. soil electrokinetic enhanced using soils from metals heavy of Removal KW. Kim H, – 1560. 6074. – hi at nidctr:tevalence the indicators: on salts chain – – 816. 2 1. 127 ś i .Aayiso ufcat nteevrnet rbesadcalne.Ce Rev. Chem challenges. and problems environment: the in surfactants of Analytics J. nik – 1686. – water – nltclceityitrae nlCe.18;61)1132A 1984;56(11) Chem. Anal J interface. chemistry analytical – – and 1049. – – drinking 5593. – sebe ufcatageae sdtrie ysm molecular some by determined as aggregates surfactant assembled – yeo niaosadtepoenerr rn aaa Soc. Faraday Trans error. protein the and indicators of type

– l ielsa oladwtrdcnaiainaet.Ce Rev. Chem agents. decontamination water and soil as Micelles al. – – water/drinking 5729. tt ertnto.JCe dc 1996;73(3):254. Educ. Chem J deprotonation. state – 6029. – mne oltetdwt ufsciaaesur- sulfosuccinamate a with treated soil amended – water – – 278. health – – advisories 108. – – 1305. 113. – 317. – – 683. 1472. – – 2):235 – – 29. ‐ – 1148A. pfoa lsia ir group nitro classical 4542. – – 225. and – Pharr fs Ac- pfos. – – F 6024. – – 16 431. – – – 987. 21 – Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd 16 hrunBrsD aa .Ipoeet otesetohtmti eemnto fgraimwt hnllooe Analyst. phenylfluorone. with germanium of determination spectrophotometric the to Improvements D. Dagar Biochem. D, Clin ThorburnáBurns (SLS). [106] sulfate lauryl sodium using by determination hemoglobin for method New J. Maeda T, Takenaka I, Oshiro [105] Leon [104] using ion (II) Ni of amounts trace of determination spectrophotometric sensitized and Selective M. and Ghaedi ruthenium copper, [103] palladium, nickel cobalt, of determination Spectrophotometric AL. Rao W, Faubel BS, Lark KN, Kaul AK, Malik [102] 2 with zinc of determination Spectrophotometric SS. Wu T, Zhe [101] 2 with silver of determination Spectrophotometric SS. Wu CL, Qu SC, Hung [100] 2 with zirconium of traces of determination spectrophotometric Sensitive TZ. Zhou DY, CP, Qi Zhang [99] 2 with (VI) uranium of determination Spectrophotometric SS. Wu CL, Qu SC, Hung [98] Fu [97] Dual H. Ohmori Sur- H, Watanabe J [96] green. Alizarin with samples pharmaceutical in bromide benzalkonium of determination Spectrophotometric W. Ma H, Wu Y, Liu after [95] peptides and acids amino of determination spectrophotometric reaction: analytical an of catalysis MP. Micellar Wong KA, organic Connors in [94] addition and substitution nucleophilic in catalysis micellar of Use K. Martinek AK, Yatsimirskii NT, Yatsimirskaya IV, cyanide Berezin of [93] determination spectrophotometry the improve to medium micellar aqueous an of Use DW. Armstrong W, Hinze S, Spurlin [92] proton and probing Fluorescence G. 8 Durocher with M, water Belletete RS, in Sarpal nitrite [91] of determination spectrophotometric The VK. Gupta J, Nair [90] p with nitrite of determination Spectrophotometric AL. FP, Underwood Tsao [89] [88] alky- and S, Red Alizarin dye, anionic [87] an between interactions binding the of appraisal quantitative A RK. Mahajan A, Kamal R, Sharma surfactants. [86] cationic and reagents triphenylmethane some with aluminium of complexes ternary of Formation M. Jarosz Chem Z, Undergraduate Marczenko J [85] system. solvent surfactant a using analysis injection flow by cobalt(II) of Determination DY. Pharr 1990;48:79 SG, Surf. Ostlund Colloids [84] surfactants. on based techniques separation chiral Novel FH. Quina Y, Suzuki ZS, Fu RW, Williams WL, Hinze [83] 2 with nickel of determination Spectrophotometric H. Ishii H, Watanabe [82] 1 with nickel of determination spectrophotometric the in agents masking of Selection J. Miura H, Watanabe [81] 1 with zinc of determination Spectrophotometric Y. Sakai H, Watanabe [80] 1 with cobalt of of determination region Spectrophotometric shield H. Watanabe precambrian [79] the in watersheds into courses golf from substances toxic of Transport CD. Metcalfe PJ, Dillon TL, Metcalfe [78] Ullmann editor. Gerhartz, W. In: sorbed Surfactants. of K. biodegradation Kosswig and [77] desorption the on concentrations low at surfactants of Effect M. Alexander YM, Calvillo BN, Aronstein Mar [76] considerations. detection and strategies monitoring distribution environments: marine in Alkylphenols E. 316A Gomez 1997;31(7) H, Technol. Fenet Sci A, Environ debate. David transatlantic [75] trigger surfactant on bans European R. Renner [74] 22 Spectrosc. Anal Prog applications. analytical and effects micellar microemulsions: and micelles in fluorescence Molecular J. Georges [107] Š 1980;105(1246):75 1982;15(2):83 1985;178:331 Acta. Chim Anal system. blue fluorine (III)/Alizarin fluoride/lanthanum the to sulphate dodecyl sodium of addition 2007;66(2):295 Spectrosc. Biomol Mol A Acta Spectrochim media. tant 2001;25(1):99 Chem. J Turkish surfactants. of presence in isoamylxanthate sodium using molybdenum 1982;29(2):85 Talanta. surfactant. anionic of presence the 2013;16(2):265 Deterg. factants 1979;68(11):1470 Sci. Pharm J dinitrobenzene. 4 2, fluoro 1 with reaction catalyzed bromide cetrimonium 1986;287(3):643 SSSR. Nauk Akad Dokl analysis. 5 5, with ion 3 1982;136:129 Acta. Chim Anal solution. bromide trimethylammonium 2016;12(6):1736 Matter. Soft study. electrochemical and spectroscopic micellization, detailed a surfactants: loxypyridinium 1982;107(1281):1431 Analyst. 2003;2(1):33 Res. 94. 1977;26(2):86 Kagaku. Bunseki 1976;25(10):667 Kagaku. Bunseki surfactant. nonionic and naphthol 1974;23(4):396 2008;27:811 Chem. Toxicol Environ Canada. Ontario, 1994:747 mbH, lagsgesellschaft 1991;25:1728 Technol. Sci Environ soil. in compounds aromatic 2009;58(7):953 Bull. Pollut 1990;13(1):27 1984;31(8):624 Talanta. surfactant. anionic of 5 1982;29(7):629 Talanta. surfactant. anionic of presence the in diethylaminophenol 1985;50(3):611 Commun. Chem Czechoslov Collect surfactants. cationoid 1985;39(1):91 Pap. Chem cation. cetylpyridinium of presence 302. Š – – mkJ o T Ru NT, Son J, imek mkJ o T Ru NT, Son J, imek – dimethyl ityaiohnli h rsneo oimluy upae aat.1982;29(12):1119 Talanta. sulphate. lauryl sodium of presence the in diethylaminophenol hn ,Fn .Setohtmti eemnto fsle ihcdo Badtio X triton and 2B cadion with silver of determination Spectrophotometric Y. Fang W, Sheng Pharr – ozlzM,Santos ME, Gonzalez – ′– – – 2 45. ihoi (2 Dithiobis – 88. – phenyl 0 hm bt.17,8,32939b. 81, 1974, Abstr. Chem. 402 – – 38. 79. ž ž i i č č aE pcrpooer td fterato ewe yso h lzrngensre n aaae nthe in vanadates and series green Alizarin the of dyes between reaction the of study Spectrophotometry E. ka – aE pcrpooercsuyo h ecino lzrngensre yswt rnlin ntepeec of presence the in ions uranyl with dyes series green Alizarin of reaction the of study Spectrophotometric E. ka 3H – – – irbnocAi) nlLt.1977;10(12):997 Lett. Anal Acid). Nitrobenzoic 960. – noe hsCe.1993;97(19):5007 Chem. Phys J indole. – 1438. egd J Polo MJ, Delgado – – – aeeghsetohtmti eemnto fcdimwt ain aat.1979;26(10):959 Talanta. cadion. with cadmium of determination spectrophotometric wavelength – 1Ce.Asr 97 7 126574e. 87, 1977, Abstr. Chem. 91 269. 1.. 816. – 626. – – izL.A mrvdmto o h pcrpooercdtriaino loieby fluoride of determination spectrophotometric the for method improved An LM. Diez 647. – 818. ’ nylpdao nutilceityVl 2.Wihi,Gray C Ver- VCH Germany: Weinheim, A25. Vol. chemistry industrial of encyclopedia s – 88. – 101. – 1731. – – 3 5 (3, – (2 5013. – – – 7 hm bt.17,8,126585j. 87, 1977, Abstr. Chem. 670 – pyridylazo) – rnfreulbimratosi ae,SS n TBuig3, using CTAB and SDS, water, in reactions equilibrium transfer – dibromo – 134. 301. – – (2 – 1008. 620. (2 – pyridylazo) – – – thiazolylazo) iraiiead2 and nitroaniline 3 5 (3, – 2 – – – – – 2 – dibromo unlnl nlCi ca 1979;111:311 Acta. Chim Anal quinolinol. pyridylazo) 631. – 3 5 (3, ahhladsratns aat.1974;21(4):295 Talanta. surfactants. and naphthol – – 2 dibromo – – – ahhladsratn.BneiKagaku. Bunseki surfactant. and naphthol 5 – 1121. – 2 – iehlmnpeo n rtnX Triton and dimethylaminophenol – 0.Tlna 1983;30(3):190 Talanta. 100. – – pyridylazo) 5 methyl – – ityaiohnli h presence the in diethylaminophenol 2 – – (6 pyridylazo) – – 105. – – – bromo 8 320A. 1471. – – – unlnli hexadecyl in quinolinol 5 α (2 – – diethyl – ezldoiei surfac- in dioxime benzyl – thiazolylazo) 2 – – 5 – benzothiazolylazo) – mnpeo in aminophenol – – – EGRUYTER DE 192. 1749. 314. – 2 – – – 335. – 961. 100. – – – – Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd 19 Esteve Chromatogr.[139] Liq J chromatography. liquid micellar in perspectives New FH. Quina WL, Hinze 1985;14(2):213 RL, Methods. Williams Purif MF, Sep Borgerding review. [138] theoretical and practical separations: in Micelles DW. Armstrong Chem. [137] Anal chromatography. liquid in phases mobile micellar with eluted solutes of behavior Partitioning F. hydrocarbons Nome DW, aromatic Armstrong polynuclear [136] and phenols of separation for phase mobile micellar aqueous an of Use SJ. Henry DW, Armstrong [135] micellar with nucleosides and decachlorobiphenyl, pesticides, of separation chromatographic layer Thin Lett. RQ. Anal Terrill DW, acids. Armstrong amino [134] and compounds aromatic polynuclear of separation TLC the in micelles of Use M. McNeely DW, Armstrong [133] P- of analysis plasma DC the on surfactants of effects Enhancement DY. Pharr Busi- A, & Hickman Science [132] Springer NY: York, New chemistry. membrane-mimetic of applications the in Advances TF. Yen RD, Gilbert JH, Fendler [131] Sanz ME, García MR, Campa la de YM, Liu [130] Sanz [129] Micellar AF. Gutiérrez RE, Fernández CC, Blanco AS, Carretero [128] Room R. Weinberger J, Noroski ML, Grayeski LC, Love [127] Micelle LC. Love M, Skrilec [126] micelle of Analysis JG. Habarta M, Skrilec LC, Love [125] solu- micellar aqueous in hydrocarbons aromatic of phosphorescence temperature Room JK. Thomas F, Grieser K, Kalyanasundaram [124] Sanz ME, Garcia Diaz [123] acid ethylenediaminetetraacetic of determination the for method spectrofluorimetric Sensitive MR. Ceba FA, Barrero AM, europium Campaña the [122] enhance to 1989;114(1):77 solutions Analyst. micellar fluorescence. of benzodiazepine Study of RD. enhancement Jee Micellar [121] FR. Soriano M, fenpro- Cirugeda of Guardia determination la fluorimetric De the [120] of sensitisation the on surfactants anionic of Influence L. Braco M, Guardia la de MV, Galdú [119] Co TN. Lövgren IA, Hemmilä YY, Xu [118] Co IA. Hemmilä YY, Xu [117] tri and thenoyltrifluoroacetone with europium of formation Complex T. Taketatsu [116] lead the of fluorescence the of Study FJ. Lopez R, Marin F, Hernandez J, Medina [115] 1 of determination fluorimetric enhanced Micellar WL. Hinze HN, Singh [114] Lett. Anal pyrene. of determination the to application methods: spectrofluorometric enhanced Micellar WL. me- Hinze micellar H, in Singh elements [113] metallic of determination fluorometric the on observations Some M.. Cirugeda Guardia la de JC, Dominguez [112] Sanz [111] Lett. Anal surfactant. Sanz of [110] use the by aluminum of determination fluorometric the of enhancement Sensitivity K. Kina N, Ishibashi [109] 1984;3(8):193 Chem. Anal Trends Trac fluorimetry. analytical enhanced Micellar NG. Harvey Y, Baba HN, Singh WL, Hinze [108] GRUYTER DE 10 eaeS tuaK ciaaK sciaA noT lcrkntcsprtoswt ielrsltosadopen and solutions micellar with separations Electrokinetic T. Ando A, Tsuchiya K, Ichikawa K, Otsuka S, Terabe [140] eu n rn ymcla iudcrmtgah sn ietijcin nlCi ca 2016;926:1 Acta. Chim Anal injection. direct using chromatography liquid micellar by urine and serum 1989;12(8):1367 1981;53(11):1662 1980;3(5):657 Chromatogr. Liq J HPLC. via 1979;51(13):2160 Chem. Anal solutions. 1979;12(12):1285 2012;11(2):54 Res. Chem ate 79 6. Dec 2012 Media, ness 1991;103(1 Acta. 7 with gallium of reaction cellar 1987;59(5):774 Chem. Anal determination. niobium to application its Fresenius samples. pineapple canned in thiabendazole fungicide 1985;170:3 Acta. Chim Anal media. organized by enhanced drugs illicit and licit 1981;85(14):2047 Chem. 1980;52(4):754 1977;51(3):501 Lett. Phys Chem tions. 1996;329(3):319 Acta. Chim 1986;58(7):1436 Anal Chem. medium. micellar a in S Red Alizarin and ions zirconium with foods in salts its and 1987;112(7):1047 Analyst. porex. 1069. 1981;10(8):1057 Lett. Chem surfactant. ionic 1986;111(2):235 Analyst. o 1982;15(A3):221 1989;39(1):50 Journal. Microchemical dia. 1987;112(4):493 Analyst. niobium the on influence nature ligand auxiliary and surfactant micelles: 1972;5(9):637 an spectroscopy: 149 chemiluminescence 1, analytical 1990, in luminescence assemblies multidimensional Organized H. in Advances Hoshino overview. and S, Igarashi TK, Smith N, Srinivasan WL, Hinze nlCe.1984;56(1):111 Chem. Anal 1992;256(1):9 Acta. Chim Anal dysprosium. and samarium terbium, europium, of tion – phthalaldehyde – – – ee ,d aCmaR,Aos I ea hlt loecneehneeti ielrmda ehnsso ufcataction. surfactant of mechanisms media: micellar in enhancement fluorescence chelate Metal JI. Alonso RF, Campa la de A, Medel ee ,FradzPrzM,D aGadaCrgd ,DmnuzJ.Mtlceaefursec nacmn ynonionic by enhancement fluorescence chelate Metal JC. Dominguez M, Cirugeda Guardia la De MM, Perez Fernandez A, Medel ee ,Mrie acaP,Da acaM.Micelle ME. Garcia Diaz PL, Garcia Martinez A, Medel – oeoJ Albiol J, Romero – 641. – – – – – 759. – 1406. 243. 2):53 1666. 1291. – 2 – – – – ecpotao eiaie faioais nls.1982;107(1278):1073 Analyst. acids. amino of derivatives mercaptoethanol 64. – ee .Fcl hmcldoyeaino ielrsltosfrro eprtr hshrsec.Anal phosphorescence. temperature room for solutions micellar of deoxygenation chemical Facile A. Medel – – 1440. – loecneehneetsse ae npvlytilooctn n tru o h iutnosdetec- simultaneous the for yttrium and pivaloyltrifluoroacetone on based system enhancement fluorescence 237. 2050. – 497. – hv ,Peris J, Chiva – 113. – – 4.Dc . Dec6 94.. tblzdroom stabilized 8adpr I 11(4),102 II: part and 58 – – 1050. iodo – – loecneefc ntime in effect fluorescence 505. – – hydroxyquinoline – 2163. iet .Arve ndvlpeto nltclmtost eemn oioal rg in drugs monitorable determine to methods analytical of development on review A J. Vicente – – 662. 58. – – ee .Micelle A. Medel – 08. 1058 eprtr hshrsec hrceitc fcraoeadrltddrvtvs Phys J derivatives. related and carbazole of characteristics phosphorescence temperature – – tblzdro eprtr hshrsec nslto.Aa Chem. Anal solution. in phosphorescence temperature room stabilized 0;n atII 03 12(2),28 2013, III: part 106;and – eprtr hshrsec,sniie hshrsec n loecneof fluorescence and phosphorescence sensitized phosphorescence, temperature – 5 – – ufncai n t plcto otemtldtriain Microchimica determination. metal the to application its and acid sulfonic – – tblzdroom stabilized tblzdlqi room liquid stabilized – estzdlmnsec fttaylns nls.1995;120(12):2867 Analyst. tetracyclines. of luminescence sensitized tblzdroom stabilized – ’ eovdfluoroimmunoassays resolved nlCe.1998;360(5):605 Chem. Anal J – 206. – 778. – – NN uoalo ope.Aa hm 1986;58(11):2161 Chem. Anal complex. lumogallion – – – eprtr iudpopoier fmtlceae and chelates metal of phosphorimetry liquid temperature dimethylaminonaphthalene – – 12. oi ytmi h rsneo oincsurfactants. nonionic of presence the in system morin eprtr hshrmti eemnto fthe of determination phosphorimetric temperature – – n 32. – – – eprtr hshrmtyfrmtl:temi- the metals: for phosphorimetry temperature 16. cypopieoiei ielrslto fnon- of solution micellar in oxide octylphosphine lc lmns(ntreprs.JUndergradu- J parts). three (in elements block – – – 608. 1080. eiw nls.1992;117(7):1061 Analyst. review. A – 6. – – 304. 5 – upoy hoieand chloride sulphonyl – uua capillaries. tubular – 325. – 82. – 9 ,and 199 Pharr – 2166. – 2872. – 23 Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd 16 afri ,SaaiA,Ghr .Taeercmn n eemnto fsle yimblzdDT irclm n lwinjec- flow and microcolumn DDTC immobilized by silver of determination and enrichment Trace M. Gohari AH, Shabani S, Dadfarnia [176] micro- 8-hydroxyquinoline an by chromium of speciation and preconcentration On-line M. Taei S, Dadfarnia AM, Shabani SH, Ahmadi [175] 5- 1, using lead of determination spectrophotometric injection Flow method. S. spectrophotometric Liawruangrath FIA A, reverse Chisvert W, using Ruengsitagoon seawater [174] in zinc trace of Determination W. Zhang R, Jiang X, Xia Y, Zou X, Zhang in F, analysis Long injection [173] flow by copper of determination spectrophotometric Kinetic N. Saghir MR, Nezhad Hormozi M, and Mirzaee AF, 4-(2-pyridylazo)-resorcinol, Safavi PAR, [172] using analysis injection flow by cobalt and nickel of analysis The MJ. Tutor KD, Sienerth DY, Pharr [171] and (TMPDA) N-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine N, N, N, using peroxide benzoyl of analysis injection Flow JA. Tomsyck DY, Pharr [170] in with analysis injection flow by seawater in Al of determination Fluorometric CI. Measures auto- JA, to Resing emphasis [169] with analysis injection flow in solvents as assemblies 2011;44(13):2287 surfactant Lett. organized Anal of analysis. P. Utilization Tzanavaras injection D flow N, in Memon surfactants [168] of use the of review A DY. Pharr [167] 2008;27(5):390 Chem. Anal R Trends [166] Trac analysis. flow-injection of Retro-review EH. Hansen J, Ruzicka [165] acid Micellar CE. Efstathiou MA, Koupparis AM, Gerakis [164] 1979. Staro Sons, [163] & Wiley John NY: York, Acid New AL. groups. Underwood functional [162] via analysis organic Quantitative JG. Hanna 1977;81(18):1755 S, Chem. Siggia Phys [161] J micelles. in polarity and potential electrical of probes as 1982;140(1):89 indicators Acta. pH P. Chim Lipoid Fromherz Anal MS, systems. Fernandez micellar [160] aqueous in acids of Dissociation X Triton AL. Underwood in proteins [159] membrane integral of separation Phase C. Bordier [158] Micelle H. Watanabe T, Kamidate 2011;162(1):59 H, Tani Sci. Interface [157] Colloid Adv systems. surfactant in behaviour Clouding BK. Mishra S, Patel S, Dash SK, P, Padhan Mukherjee [156] Micelle CD. Stalikas [155] Rodr CM, CP, Santana Sanz ZS, Ferrera [154] Micelle MI. Karayannis DL, Giokas EK, Paleologos Microchimica analysis. [153] metal for systems detection instrumental to extraction point cloud Coupling LD. Martinez ES, surface Cerutti hexacyanoferrate MF, Silva nickel [152] with electrodes of modification the on surfactant cationic a of GP. Influence Inter- Rao Colloid H, Adv Gomathi electrodes. R, of Vittal modification [151] the in and electrochemistry in surfactants of role Beneficial KJ. Kim H, Gomathi R, ex- Vittal spectroscopic [150] and electrochemical 2 systems ordered in Electrochemistry HN. Blount RL, Casselberry DM, Chiappardi GL, McIntire [149] water of polarography for technique New GE. Proske [148] 18, 1993, chemistry. Electroanalytical fluids. microheterogeneous related and microemulsions micelles, in Electrochemistry JF. Rusling [147] as- practical on focusing innovations instrumental and methodological of review a chromatography: electrokinetic Micellar M. Silva Media, [146] Business & Science PA:Springer Philadelphia, and York New electrophoresis. capillary by pharmaceuticals of Analysis KD. Altria Rev.[145] Chem applications. and development of years twenty electrophoresis: capillary using analysis speciation Element AR. Timerbaev Chro- [144] Biomed analysis. toxicological in techniques electrophoresis capillary of 159 application 2. The Dec H. 2012 Milnerowicz Press, K, CA:Academic Witt Diego, San E, practice. Sieradzka and [143] theory electrophoresis: Capillary JC. Colburn PD, Grossman [142] high in media separation as Micelles MG. Khaledi [141] 24 for method fluorescence induced photochemically enhanced micellar line on new A JJ. Aaron MD, Seye E, Leverend S, Guigand Irace [177] inaoi bopinsetoer.Tlna 2004;64(3):682 Talanta. spectrometry. absorption atomic tion 2007;31(2):191 Chem. J Turkish spectrometry. absorption atomic 199. injection flow and alumina surfactant-coated on immobilized column 2010;81(1):709 Talanta. micellar. aqueous in diphenylthiocarbazone 2006;16(6):44 Gongcheng. Yu Kexue Pige 2005;38(1):13 Lett. Spectrosc medium. micellar cationic 2004;3(2):57 Res. Chem Und J X-100. Triton 2009;42(5):821 Lett. Anal surfactants. 1994;66(22):4105 Chem. 2014;10(3):338 Chem. Anal Curr analytes. organic of derivatization mated 1993;11(1):33 Anal. Biomed 1987;329(4):472 1761. 79. 31;23(7):469 Aug 2004 Chem. Anal Trends Trac samples. environmental in 2005;24(5):426 2006;155(3 Acta. 2000;45(13):2083 Acta. Electrochimica films. 2006;119(1):55 Sci. face 1982;86(14):2632 Chem. Phys J micelles. nonionic and cationic, anionic, and nitrobenzene between interactions the of amination 1 2013;34(1):141 Electrophoresis. pects. . Apr17 17. Apr 2013 2012;113(1):778 2014;28(11):1507 matogr. 1997;780(1):3 A. Chromatogr J perspective. and overview sis: eemnto fpeyue ebcd eiusi ae.Lmnsec.2005;20(3):138 Luminescence. water. in residues herbicide phenylurea of determination 2002;21(5):343 – 0 n adA,Dce ,eios lcraayia hmsr eiso dacsvl 8 oaRtn L R rs 94. 1994 Press CRC FL: Raton, Boca 18. vol. advances of series a chemistry Electroanalytical editors. M, Decker AJ, Bard In: 80. ůž Pharr i č ś aJ h eodcmn ffo-neto nlss nlCi ca 1992;261(1):3 Acta. Chim Anal analysis. flow-injection of coming second The J. ka i ,Msiwc ,MlciF Acid F. Malecki E, Maskiewicz R, cik – – – – 355. 812. – 436. 474. 4):349 – – eitdetato sato o eaainadpeocnrto nmtlaayi.Ta rnsAa Chem. Anal Trends Trac analysis. metal in preconcentration and separation for tool a as extraction mediated – aettain nauosmcla ytm.Aa hmAt.1977;93:267 Acta. Chim Anal systems. micellar aqueous in titrations base – 68. – – 364. 4111. 1513. – 41. – – 158. 832. ı uzJ.Teueo ielrssesi h xrcinadpre and extraction the in systems micellar of use The JJ. guez – – 46. – – eitdetato.JCrmtg .1997;780(1):229 A. Chromatogr J extraction. mediated 63. aettain fbriuae nauosmcla ei.Fresenius media. micellar aqueous in barbiturates of titrations Base – 2093. – – eitdsprto n cloud and separation mediated efrac iudcrmtgah n high and chromatography liquid performance – – noul opud.Aa hm 1952;24(11):1834 Chem. Anal compounds. insoluble 22. – aeptnimti irtoso ekaii n/rislbedus Pharm J drugs. insoluble and/or acidic weak of titrations potentiometric base – 40. – 687. – 713. – 1 ouin ilCe.1981;256(4):1604 Chem. Biol J solution. 114 – – 348. 7 Aug31. 479 – on xrcin rcTed nlChem. Anal Trends Trac extraction. point – – 10. 142. – 273. – – 2311. – 241. – efrac ailr electrophore- capillary performance 97. – ocnrto fogncpollutants organic of concentration – 393. – iepeocnrto.Anal preconcentration. line – 1836. ’ nlChem. Anal Z – 1607. – 8. e2. Dec2 187.. EGRUYTER DE – 2640. – – – Automatically generated rough PDF by ProofCheck from River Valley Technologies Ltd 16 atS,Mui P eemnto fciia iel ocnrto CC fnnoi ufcat ydnracpo neato with interaction donor-acceptor by surfactants nonionic of (CMC) concentration micelle critical of SP. Determination Moulik SK, Hait [186] approach. kinetic using surfactants non-ionic of concentration micelle critical of Determination S. Ledakowicz J, Mayer J, Perkowski [185] acid sulphuric (III) diperiodatoargentate on based Gemifloxacin of determination Chemiluminescence W. Xiong WH, Zhao F, Zhao [184] chemiluminescence with analysis injection flow by preparations pharmaceutical in l-thyroxine of Determination Y. Liu H, Wang precon- J, mediated Cao micelle [183] by nanoparticles oxide iron and gold, silver, of determination Ultratrace AG. Vlessidis DL, Giokas GZ, extraction Tsogas cloud-point [182] flow-injection on-line and extraction cloud-point traditional of Comparison JM. Lin K, Hayakawa C, Lu and GQ, extraction Song point [181] cloud using cadmium and lead of preconcentration injection flow P. Simultaneous Roldan Santos dos EL, Silva [180] Carabias-Mart [179] the for fluorescence photochemically-induced with implemented device optosensing Flow-through D. Am ML, Córdova de JL, Flores [178] GRUYTER DE oieadcreaino M ihhdohl-iohl aac n te aaeeso h ufcat.JSr e.2001;4(3):303 Det. Surf J surfactants. the of parameters other and balance hydrophile-lipophile with CMC of correlation and lodine 1995;101:103 A. Surfaces Colloids 2013;28(2):108 Luminescence. medium. micellar a in reaction 2015;140:162 luminol the of enhancement the on based detection 2014;86(7):3484 Chem. Anal detection. chemiluminescence injection flow with coupled back-extraction centration/selective 2006;384(4):1007 Chem. Bioanal Anal marker. a as benzo[a]pyrene using method chemiluminescence a with 2009;161(1):142 Mater. Hazard J spectrometry. absorption atomic by determination 2009;11(5):1080 Monit. Environ J waters. environmental in methyl metsulfuron of screening simple and rapid xrcinadpeocnrto fognccmonspirt hoaorpyadcplayeetohrss hoaorA. Chromatogr J electrophoresis. capillary and chromatography 2000;902(1):251 to prior compounds organic of preconcentration and extraction – 165. ı e ,Rodr R, nez – 265. ı uzGnaoE oeoCreoB ée-aó L Garc JL, Pérez-Pavón B, Moreno-Cordero E, guez-Gonzalo – 106. – KMnO 4 – ecini ielrmdu.SetohmAt o imlSpectrosc. Biomol Mol A Acta Spectrochim medium. micellar a in reaction 113. – 147. ı -it ,Lepd F ufcatcodpoint cloud Surfactant EF. Laespada C, a-Pinto – – 1012. 1085. Pharr – 3492. – 309. 25