Scottish Information Commissioner 2013/14 Annual Report Taking FOI Forward Contents, Facts and Figures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scottish Information Commissioner 2013/14 Annual Report Taking FOI Forward Contents, Facts and Figures Scottish Information Commissioner 2013/14 Annual Report Taking FOI forward Contents, facts and figures 2013/14 was a year of firsts… 62% 578 Rosemary Agnew 62% of our appeals were from We received 578 appeals Scottish Information Commissioner members of the public in 2013/14 Commissioner’s welcome Enforcing FOI: Our appeals Enforcing FOI: Our appeals See page 2 See page 4 See page 5 24% 75% 24% of our valid appeals were made We met our target and closed 75% 61We settled 61 cases without following a failure to respond of cases within 4 months the need for a formal decision Enforcing FOI: Our appeals Enforcing FOI: Our investigations Enforcing FOI: Our outcomes See page 6 See page 7 See page 10 % 20% 78% 67We found wholly or partially 20% of our decisions Awareness of FOI amongst in favour of requesters in 67% concerned requests for the Scottish public is at 78% of our decisions environmental information Enforcing FOI: Our outcomes Enforcing FOI: Other issues Regional Fact Files See page 11 See page 13 See page 14 Annual Report 2013/14 1 The costs that arise from FOI are outweighed by the 60,000+ % increase in transparency 100 and accountability to the 100% of attendees at our FOI citizen that result. Scottish public authorities reported workshops for the voluntary sector receiving over 60,000 FOI and EIR rated them as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon requests across the year Holyrood FOI Conference, December 2013 Strengthening FOI: Our events Strengthening FOI: Our events Strengthening FOI: Our research See page 16 See page 18 See page 20 900+ 2,008 Over 900 people subscribe to our 80+Over 80 service-users contacted We received our highest number weekly round-up of decisions us to share positive comments of enquiries to date, at 2,008 about our service Managing the organisation: Managing the organisation: Strengthening FOI: Our guidance Our approach Our enquiries See page 22 See page 25 See page 26 …so what can 100% £1.69m you expect in 2014/15? We responded to all of our Our total expenditure for information requests within the year was £1.69 million 20 working days Rosemary Agnew Scottish Information Commissioner Managing the organisation: Managing the organisation: Our information requests Our financial performance The last word See page 27 See page 28 See page 29 2 Annual Report 2013/14 Commissioner’s welcome It was also the end for some things, …enabling and supporting Scottish in particular our authority assessment public authorities to develop and maintain programme. From April 2014 we are high standards of FOI policy and developing a new approach to assessing practice… We want to add value, by authority FOI practice, which we believe helping authorities to help themselves. will deliver improvements in a more One of the ways we do this is through effective and value-for-money way. publishing a weekly round-up of the decisions we have taken and the key If all of this sounds a bit cryptic, let me learning points (positive and negative). give you more insight into what is to We do the reading for you, so that we come in the report. can all learn from each other. We also draw attention to significant decisions FOI is well-established in Scotland. But that have set precedents, and to very more than that, the principles underlying straightforward decisions that are simply it are important to us all; accountability, good examples. openness, transparency, customer service. Our challenge is to live those …positively influencing cultural change principles in the way we use and apply in Scottish public authorities’ approach FOI, ensuring that we both meet statutory to meeting their FOI duties… It is not 2013/14 was a year of “firsts”. For the requirements and, more importantly, enough for authorities to know what first time, Scotland has collected and add value to the way in which public their duties are. We think it is equally collated national statistics about FOI authorities and service users communicate important that they, and others, know requests. For the first time since 2009 and interact. In 2012/13 I laid my Strategic how effectively duties are being delivered. we saw a slight drop in appeals to the Plan before the Scottish Parliament. Since introducing the self-reporting by Commissioner. We received over 2,000 I set five strategic aims which focus on authorities of FOI data each quarter enquiries for the first time. We launched adding value to our FOI regime, so that (which we then publish through our the first of our Regional Roadshows. it contributes towards our collective aims web-site), we have seen many authorities It was the first full year of our Decisions of openness and service improvement. introduce internal reporting systems Round-up. We provided training to through which they reflect on FOI culture and leisure trusts, the first bodies All of my office’s activity focusses on performance such as response times. to be designated by an order made by contributing directly to our aims; both for The good news from the statistics Scottish Ministers under section 5 of the my organisation, and more importantly is that less than 1% of requests result FOI Act. And as if all of that were not for open and transparent access to in an appeal to me. enough, here at the Commissioner’s information in Scotland. We don’t just office we carried out ourfirst want FOI to be good, we want FOI to comprehensive review of the way we move forward and develop as public investigate applications and were among authorities and requesters develop. the first Scottish public authorities to So what have we been doing towards have our Records Management Plan our strategic aims? You will have to approved by the Keeper of the Records read the whole report to get a full picture of Scotland. but here are a few tasters… Annual Report 2013/14 3 22 The Commissioner is supported by a team of 22, (FTE* 20), as at 31 March 2014. * FTE: Full time equivalent …encouraging effective and responsible …influencing and supporting the …being recognised as an organisation of use of FOI rights… This year saw the development of Scottish information law accessible experts, that is run efficiently, launch of regional roadshows. We visit and policy… We supported the order governed effectively and leads by an area and offer seminars, workshops made by Ministers under section 5 of example… In January 2014 our Records and meetings to a range of stakeholders. the FOI Act to make cultural and leisure Management Plan (a requirement under These include sessions for requesters bodies delivering services on behalf of the Public Records Scotland Act) was and the local media which focus on how local authorities subject to FOI. This order approved and is being used by the to use FOI effectively. followed the amendments made to FOI Keeper as an example of good practice. by the 2013 Amendment Act, about which we published a detailed briefing. Rosemary Agnew Scottish Information Commissioner Terms used: FOI Freedom of information The FOI Act The Freedom of EIRs The Environmental Information Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (Scotland) Regulations 2004 4 Annual Report 2013/14 Enforcing FOI: Our appeals Anyone who is unhappy with the way a request for information has been handled by a Scottish public authority can appeal to the Commissioner. Total appeals by legislation In 2013/14 we received 578 appeals. Appeals made to FOI Act EIRs Although this was a slight fall (2.7%) on us under the EIRs 33 the previous year, appeal numbers remain 413 high. The good news is that the reduction appears to be attributable to a slight drop 2009/10 380 in appeals about failures by authorities % 37 to respond within timescales. 12 2013/14 424 We saw the sixth consecutive rise in 2010/11 387 appeals made to us under the EIRs, 48 with 12% of our appeals across the year relating to requests for environmental 10 % 523 2012/13 information. 2011/12 475 60 594 9% 2012/13 534 2011/12 67 578 2013/14 511 Who appeals? Appeals by type of requester 2013/14 As always, by far the largest proportion of our appeals came from members 3% Commercial / private enterprise 3% Voluntary / campaign organisation of the public. These accounted for 62% Elected representative 1% Community council of new appeals in 2013/14 (represented as 3% (MP, MEP, MSP, Councillor) ‘Public and other’ in the chart to the right). 1% Solicitor Solicitor The number of appeals received from 5% (on behalf of client) journalists increased this year, with these now accounting for 14% of our total appeals, compared with 12% last 8% Prisoner year. Many of these appeals were made 62% Public following a failure by a public authority and other1 to respond within the 20 working day timescale. We explore this further on 14% Media page 12. 1 ‘Public and other’ represents all individual members of the public with no identified affiliation to an organisation or group. Appeals by sector The largest proportion of our appeals 2% 1% 1% 1% were about requests made to local government, which includes all of 1% 1% 2% 1% Scotland’s 32 local councils and local licensing boards and assessors. 2% 3% 5% 5% The Scottish Government and its 9% agencies continued to account for 9% a significant proportion of appeals, 43% 41% with one quarter of our new appeals 7% about central government. 11% 30% 25% 2012/13 2013/14 Local government Non-ministerial office holders Scottish Government and its agencies Bodies not covered by the FOI Act2 Other public authority Educational institutions The NHS Scottish Parliament Police Publicly-owned companies Subject of appeals The subject matter of our appeals Administration of the authority 21% was as diverse as ever, reflecting the Safety and crime 7% enormous range of issues about which Environment 6% people exercise their FOI rights.
Recommended publications
  • Japan and the UK
    Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper University of Oxford Freedom of Information Legislation and Application: Japan and the UK By Satoshi Kusakabe Michaelmas Term 2016/Hilary and Trinity Terms 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 1 1. Introduction 2 2. Literature review 2.1 Existing research on FOI and journalism in Japan and the UK 5 3. Media analysis 3.1 How often have journalists used FOI in Japan and the UK? 8 4. Case studies in Japan 4.1 Overview of the FOI legislation 12 4.2 Misuse of public expenses by Tokyo Governors 13 4.3 Misuse of disaster reconstruction money 15 4.4 Government letters to the US military 17 5. Case studies in the UK 5.1 Overview of the FOI legislation 19 5.2 MPs’ expenses scandal 23 5.3 Prince Charles’s letters 25 5.4 The Government’s Failed attempt to water down FOI 27 5.5 National security vs. FOI 28 5.6 A powerful tool for local journalists 30 6. Challenges of FOI for journalism 6.1 Lazy journalism? 32 6.2 Less recording and the “chilling effect” 34 6.3 Delay and redaction 36 7. Conclusions and recommendations 38 Bibliography 40 Appendix 42 Acknowledgements The nine months I spent in Oxford must be one of the most exciting and fulfilling periods in my career. This precious experience has definitely paved a new way for me to develop my career as a journalist. I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to the following: The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism for giving me the opportunity to conduct this research, and my supervisor Chris Westcott for giving me a lot of kind advice and intellectual insights; also James Painter, David Levy and all the staff for providing great academic and administrative support.
    [Show full text]
  • (Scotland) Act 2002
    Extension of Coverage of Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 UNISON Scotland’s response to the Scottish Government Consultation on Further Extension of Coverage of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 to More Organisations September 2015 INTRODUCTION UNISON is Scotland’s largest trade union representing around 155,000 members working in the public sector. UNISON Scotland welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Scottish Government Consultation on Further Extension of Coverage of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FoISA) to More Organisations. GENERAL COMMENTS UNISON Scotland is very disappointed about Scottish Government action on extending FoISA. There has been far too long spent on discussing and consulting about extending the legislation and far too little listening to important voices, including the Scottish Information Commissioner Rosemary Agnew and her predecessor Kevin Dunion, calling for a wide range of further bodies to be included. It is our longstanding view that the public should be able to access information about the public services they use and about public and political decisions that affect them, whatever type of body holds the information or provides the service. This does not happen in Scotland and the current proposal goes nowhere far enough, given the extent to which information rights have been lost because of the number of public services delivered by private companies and other bodies not covered by FOISA. As Mr Dunion said in 2007, information rights should “follow the money” when public services are privatised and outsourced1. He reiterated this in a strong plea to safeguard and strengthen rights in his Special Report, laid before the Scottish Parliament, in January 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Sport Committee
    Health and Sport Committee Tuesday 19 November 2019 Session 5 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.parliament.scot or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Tuesday 19 November 2019 CONTENTS Col. SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION............................................................................................................................... 1 Public Services Reform (The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) (Healthcare Whistleblowing) Order 2020 [Draft] ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Public Services Reform (The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) (Healthcare Whistleblowing) Order 2020: Statement of Principles [Draft] .............................................................................................. 1 HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT (HEALTH HAZARDS) ............................................................................................. 15 PRIMARY CARE INQUIRY................................................................................................................................... 29 HEALTH AND SPORT COMMITTEE 27th Meeting 2019, Session 5 CONVENER *Lewis Macdonald (North East Scotland) (Lab) DEPUTY CONVENER *Emma Harper (South Scotland) (SNP) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *George Adam (Paisley) (SNP) *Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) *Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD) *David Stewart (Highlands
    [Show full text]
  • FOI 10 Years On: Are the Right Organisations Covered? Contents
    Scottish Information Commissioner FOI 10 years on: Are the right organisations covered? Contents Commissioner’s introduction 2 Key findings 4 Why it is important the ‘right’ organisations are covered 5 How do organisations become subject to FOI? 7 What are the Commissioner’s concerns about Section 5 designation? 8 Loss of rights and duties 8 Extension of the FOI Act 8 Other concerns about who is covered 9 What does the public think about… 10 …FOI generally? 10 …extending FOI? 10 Why has Section 5 not been used more? 13 Approach to identification of organisations 13 Political will 13 Failure to consider loss of rights 14 Public function 14 Fear of what designation means in practice 14 Is there a better approach to Section 5 designation? 16 A rights based approach 16 Functions of a public nature 16 A factor based approach 16 Conclusions and recommendations 19 Appendix 1: Understanding FOI law 20 Who is responsible for making organisations subject to FOI law? 20 How do organisations become covered by the FOI Act? 20 How do organisations become covered by the EIRs? 22 Appendix 2: Results of survey of culture and leisure trusts 23 Appendix 3: A brief history of use of Section 5 designation powers 24 FOI 10 years on 1 10 YEARS FOI 94% The right to ask for information The right to request and receive of the public think FOI is important came into force 1 January 2005 information held by Scottish public to hold public authorities to account authorities What does the public think Commissioner’s introduction Key findings about FOI generally? See page 2 See page 4 See page 10 15,000 81% Section 5 Order designating new tenants in social housing have lost of the public think bodies building authorities1 in 10 years of FOI enforceable FOI rights to information and maintaining schools and from their landlord hospitals should be subject to FOI What are the Commissioner’s What are the Commissioner’s concerns about Section 5 concerns about Section 5 What does the public think designation? designation? about extending FOI? See page 8 See page 8 See page 10 When do organisations..
    [Show full text]
  • Public Procurement in Scotland the Case for Scrutiny, Accountability and Transparency
    Public Procurement in Scotland The case for scrutiny, accountability and transparency Margaret Cuthbert May 2017 COMMON WEAL is a think-and-do tank that advocates policies that put All of Us First. For more information on Common Weal Policy visit allofusfirst.org/policy or email [email protected] Visit allofusfirst.org to get your copy of the Common Weal Book of Ideas 2016/21: 101 big ideas for the next term of the Scottish Parliament. Available to order or as an e-book. Author Margaret Cuthbert is an economist and statistician. She lectured in econometrics at Glasgow, Strathclyde and Heriot Watt Universities. She worked as a consultant in economcs at the OECD and was a member of the World Bank/OECD expert group on Purchasing Power Parities. She set up her own consultancy business and ran it for many years. Her work, along with Jim Cuthbert’s, can be read at jamcuthbert.co.uk Contents Introduction page 1 Background page 2 Issue 1: Why are our public representatives signing up to deals where we, the public, cannot question the terms of the deal? page 2 Issue 2: Given Freedom of Information, why do we rarely receive helpful answers to requests for information? page 3 Issue 3: Why is there an ever-growing role for Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs) in capital and revenue spending in Scotland? page 4 Issue 4: Why are we not measuring the effect on local business and employment in public procurement? page 7 Issue 5: Why is there no Whole of Government Accounts for Scotland? page 7 Issue 6: Why have we not made the Scottish Government and
    [Show full text]
  • Press Update – 12 December 2012 “Feck Off to Fish
    Press Update – 12 December 2012 “Feck Off to Fish Farms”/“GM Salmon May Sink”/“ISA Allegations”/“Seal-Shooting Salmon Farmers”/“Opposition Mounts” – online here Please find enclosed a press update (articles in full online here) including: “Smoked Farm Salmon Boycott Launched” (Wild Fish, 12 December) Listen online to Ireland's RTE radio on the call for a boycott of Irish farmed salmon - via "Row Over Salmon Farm in Galway" “Petition on salmon farming gets 11,000 signatures” (Radio New Zealand, 12 December) “Down our throats: Fed-up with salmon feedlots” (Rabble, 11 December) “FishyLeaks: Lice-Infested Irish Salmon!” (Green Around the Gills, 11 December) “Teen takes salmon farm petition to Beehive” (Fairfax NZ News, 11 December) “Nova Scotia APES Smell Something Fishy in Open Pen Approval Process” (Halifax Media Co-op, 11 December) “Fishers concerned with pesticide use” (The Coaster, 11 December) “Fish farm statement ‘waffle’ ” (The Press & Journal, 11 December) “Ban anglers from catching salmon in spring, urge fish farm experts” (The Scotsman, 11 December) “Both sides in salmon row must work together” (The Herald, 11 December) “Scottish wild salmon given protected status” (The Herald, 11 December) “Salmon take centre stage in southern river study” (ABC News, 11 December) “Mainstream Canada First two-star BAP Certified Salmon Farm in BC” (The Fish Site, 11 December) “Galway protest planned” (Fish News EU, 10 December) “Ireland Says ‘Feck Off’ to Super-Size Salmon Farm in Galway Bay” (Green Around the Gills, 10 December) “County mayor calls for suspension of licensing process for Inis Oirr fish farm” (Galway Bay FM, 10 December) “Groups To Protest Marine Minister's Office Over Galway Bay Salmon Farm” (Afloat, 10 December) “Opposition mounts to super-sized fish farm in Galway Bay” (The Irish Times, 10 December) “Eastern Shore residents march on Legislature” (South Coast Today, 10 December) “N.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    Meeting of the Parliament Wednesday 21 June 2017 Session 5 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.parliament.scot or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Wednesday 21 June 2017 CONTENTS Col. MOTOR NEURONE DISEASE GLOBAL AWARENESS DAY ...................................................................................... 1 Motion debated—[Christina McKelvie]. Christina McKelvie (Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse) (SNP) ................................................................. 1 Kezia Dugdale (Lothian) (Lab) ...................................................................................................................... 4 Clare Haughey (Rutherglen) (SNP) .............................................................................................................. 6 Donald Cameron (Highlands and Islands) (Con) ......................................................................................... 7 Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) ..................................................................................................... 9 Brian Whittle (South Scotland) (Con) ......................................................................................................... 11 The Minister for Mental Health (Maureen Watt) ......................................................................................... 13 BUSINESS MOTION ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012) (1.9MB Pdf
    Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 1: 1st Parliamentary Year, Session 4 (11 May 2011 – 10 May 2012) SPJ 4.1 Foreword The Journal is the central, long-term, authoritative record of what the Parliament has done. The Minutes of Proceedings, which are produced for each meeting of the Parliament, do that in an immediate way, while the Journal presents essentially the same material but has the benefit of hindsight to allow any errors and infelicities of presentation to be corrected. Unlike the Official Report, which primarily records what is said, the Minutes of Proceedings, and in the longer term the Journal, provide the authoritative record of what was done. The Journal is required under Rule 16.3 of Standing Orders and contains, in addition to the Minutes of Proceedings themselves, notice of any Bill introduced*, notice of any instrument or draft instrument or any other document laid before the Parliament; notice of any report of a committee, and any other matter that the Parliament, on a motion of the Parliamentary Bureau, considers should be included. (* The requirement to include notice of Bills introduced was only added to Rule 16.3 in January 2003. However, such notices have in practice been recorded in the Annex to the Minutes of Proceedings from the outset.) Note: (DT), which appears throughout the Journal, signifies a decision taken at Decision Time. Chamber Office Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 1: 1st Parliamentary Year, Session 4 (11 May 2011 – 10 May 2012) Contents Page Journal ………………………………………………………………………………1 Annex A Bills Introduced …………………………………………………………..………248 Annex B Subordinate Legislation— 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The William Wallace Letters
    BR ADSHEET ISSUE 18 SEPTEMBER 2012 e-magazine of the SCOTTISH COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES WELCOME TO THE ISSUE (number 18) Over the month of August, Edinburgh’s world famous arts festival attracts enough visitors to safely double or even triple the city’s population. As any festival-goer or local resident will attest, you’re as likely to spot a famous actor or pass a worryingly amateur flame thrower as you are to hear a traditional piper. There are an overwhelming variety of performances and spectacles to take in. Opening at the height of the festival, it’s wonderful to see that Special Delivery: The Wil- liam Wallace Letters exhibition at the Scottish Parliament offered a chance for visitors and natives alike to view the only two surviving documents linked to William Wallace. These tremendously impor- tant records are on display until 25 September 2012. We urge one and all to go and see them while you have the chance. Though we cannot offer the theatrical or sonorific, we bring the exciting news of funding for a Na- tional Sound Archive for Scotland. We’re also delighted to introduce the newly appointed archi- vist for Inverclyde Council, Neil Dickson. This month’s issue also brings an introduction to Rose- mary Agnew, the Scottish Information Commissioner, with an exploration of common ground shared with the Scottish Council on Archives. We’re now inviting archives in Scotland to share their thoughts on education provision within their services by completing our Education and Archives survey. Your input will help to ensure that the work of the Scottish Council on Archives Education Working Group is relevant to your needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 20 September 2012 Session 4 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Thursday 20 September 2012 CONTENTS Col. SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT QUESTION TIME ................................................................................................... 11693 GENERAL QUESTIONS ................................................................................................................................ 11693 Binge Drinking ...................................................................................................................................... 11693 Proposed Procurement Reform Bill (Sustainability) ............................................................................. 11694 Immigration (Families) .......................................................................................................................... 11695 Business Start-ups (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) .............................................................................. 11696 Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (Meetings) ................................................................................ 11697 Drug Misuse .......................................................................................................................................... 11698 Atos Work Capability Assessments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]