ABSTRACT
Modifications of the Small Molecule Maltol and Photoactivity when Coordinated to Transition Metals
Britain C. Bruner, Ph.D.
Advisor: Patrick J. Farmer, Ph.D.
The family of hetero-substituted maltol chelators, thiomaltol (Htma), dithiomaltol
(Httma), and 3-hydroxypyridine-4-thione (Hopto) have been used to generate complexes with Ru(II), Pt(II), Ti(IV), and P(III) that exhibit unique photochemical and photophysical properties. Photo-excitation into ligand-based absorption bands of
+ complexes [Ru(bpy)2(ttma)] and Zn(ttma)2 engendered electron transfer reactions. Both complexes exhibit long-lived triplet emissions in the near IR spectral region.
+ Photochemical experiments with [Ru(bpy)2(ttma)] formed alcohol and aldehyde products upon photolysis in presence of mild oxidants that do not oxidize in the dark,
3+ 2+ such as methyl viologen, [Ru(NH3)6] and [Co(NH3)5Cl] . A family of new Pt(II) bipyridyl complexes are reported using the maltol-derived ligands as electron-donors.
The [Pt(bpy)L]+ complexes display intense and long-lived luminescences due to Ligand- to-Ligand Charge Transfer (LLCT) states; these luminescences are quenched by electron acceptors such as methylviologen and O2. These compounds are also efficient at singlet 1 oxygen ( O2) generation and quenching. Likewise, a family of Ti(IV) complexes with
maltol-derived chelators has been synthesized to model the use in dye-sensitized solar
cell applications. Lastly, several novel six-coordinate phosphorous complexes with the chelators of the formula P(L)2X2 were synthesized, which also exhibit room temperature
emissions. These several families of photo-active complexes represent a useful palette of
dyes for photochemical applications. Modifications of the Small Molecule Maltol and Photoactivity when Coordinated to Transition Metals
by
Britain C. Bruner, B.A.
A Dissertation
Approved by the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Patrick J. Farmer, Ph.D., Chairperson
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Approved by the Dissertation Committee
Patrick J. Farmer, Ph.D., Chairperson
Kevin Klausmeyer, Ph.D.
Caleb D. Martin, Ph.D.
Kevin L. Shuford, Ph.D.
Zhenrong Zhang, Ph.D.
Accepted by the Graduate School August 2014
J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean
Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School. Copyright © 2014 by Britain C. Bruner
All rights reserved
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures ...... vi List of Schemes ...... x List of Tables ...... xi Acknowledgments...... xiii Chapter One ...... 1 References ...... 11
Chapter Two...... 16 Introduction ...... 16 Experimental ...... 18 Results ...... 25 Discussion ...... 38 Conclusions ...... 43 References ...... 44
Chapter Three...... 47 Introduction...... 47 Experimental ...... 49 Results ...... 57 Discussion ...... 72 Conclusions ...... 84 References ...... 86
Chapter Four ...... 89 Introduction ...... 89 Experimental ...... 92 Results ...... 95 Discussion ...... 104 Conclusions ...... 109 References ...... 111
Chapter Five ...... 113 Introduction ...... 113 Experimental ...... 114 Results ...... 118 Discussion ...... 131 Conclusion ...... 132 References ...... 134
Bibliography ...... 141
v LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 1H NMR stack plot of maltol, thiomaltol, dithiomaltol, Hopto, deferiprone .... 3
Figure 1.2 Room temperature UV-visible absorption spectra (normalized) of thiolated, maltol-derived ligands in CH3CN ...... 5
Figure 1.3 Solid state structures of trismaltolato Fe(III) and tristhiomaltolato Fe(III) ...... 7
Figure 2.1 Crystal structure of Httma ...... 26
Figure 2.2 Crystal structure of [Zn(ttma)] 2, 2-4 ...... 26
Figure 2.3 Cyclic voltammograms of 2-1, 2-4, and Httma ...... 29
+ Figure 2.4 Comparison of normalized UV-vis spectra of [Ru(bpy)2ttma] , Zn(ttma)2 and -1 -1 Ru(bpy)3 molar extinction coefficient (M cm ). Inset: of Httma over same range ...... 30
Figure 2.5 Normalized absorption and emission spectra for compound 2-4 in CH3CN. .. 31
Figure 2.6 Normalized absorption and emission spectra for 2-4 in CH3OH...... 31
Figure 2.7 ESI-MS spectrum of a sample generated by photoexcitation of an anaerobic + 2+ solution of [Ru(bpy)2(ttma)] and MV in CH3CN/CH3OH followed the + addition of 0.1 M NaOH. The species formed is [Ru(bpy)2(ttma-aldehyde)] (m/z = 584)...... 32
Figure 2.8 LCMS analysis of product solution after photolysis of 2-1 for in presence of Ru(NH3)6Cl3 ...... 34
+ Figure 2.9 Internal standard calibration curve for determining percent [Ru(bpy)2ttma] + and percent [Ru(bpy)2ttma-aldehyde] . Peak area ratio is equal to the ratio of + the sample to internal standard, [Ru(bpy)3] ...... 35
Figure 2.10 1H NMR spectra of complexes 2-1 – 2-4, free ligands Htma and Httma...... 35
Figure 2.11 MS analysis of soluble products obtained after photo-oxidations of 2-4 ...... 36
1 Figure 3.1 H NMR spectra (CD3CN) of 3-1 (top), 3-2 (middle) and 3-3 (bottom) ...... 58
Figure 3.2 Cyclic voltammograms of complexes 3-1, 3-2a and 3-3 ...... 60
Figure 3.3 Room temperature UV-vis absorption of 3-1 & emission...... 61
vi Figure 3.4 Room temperature UV-vis absorption of 3-2 & emission...... 61
Figure 3.5 Room temperature UV-vis absorption of 3-2b & emission ...... 61
Figure 3.6 Room temperature UV-vis absorption of 3-3 & emission...... 62
Figure 3.7 Room temperature excitation/emission spectra of 3-1 ...... 63
Figure 3.8 Room temperature lifetime of 3-1 & fit ...... 63
Figure 3.9. Low temperature (77K) excitation/emission spectra of 3-1 ...... 64
Figure 3.10 Low temperature (77K) lifetime of 3-1 & fit in DMM ...... 64
Figure 3.11 Room temperature excitation/emission spectra of 3-2a ...... 64
Figure 3.12 Room temperature lifetime of 3-2a & fit in DMM ...... 65
Figure 3.13 Low temperature (77K) excitation/emission spectra of 3-2a ...... 65
Figure 3.14 Low temperature (77K) lifetime of 2 & fit in DMM ...... 65
Figure 3.15 Visible excitation/emission and near IR emission of 3-2b ...... 66
Figure 3.16 Room temperature excitation/emission spectra of 3-3 ...... 66
Figure 3.17 Room temperature lifetime of 3-3 & fit in DMM ...... 66
Figure 3.18 Low temperature (77K) excitation/emission spectra of 3-3 ...... 67
Figure 3.19 Low temperature (77K) lifetime of 3-3 & fit in DMM ...... 67
Figure 3.20 Quenching of 3-1, 3-2a, and 3-3 luminescence by methyl viologen ...... 69
Figure 3.21 Plot of Pt(II) concentration vs emission intensity ...... 70
Figure 3.22 Self Quenching of [Pt(t-butylbpy)ttma]+ and [Pt(bpy)ttma]+ ...... 70
Figure 3.23 Plots of singlet oxygen luminescence quenching constants (Kobs) vs. concentration of complexes 3-1 – 3-3 ...... 71
1 Figure 3.24 H NMR spectra (CD3CN) of 3-4 (bottom), 3-5 (middle) and 3-6 (top) ...... 80
Figure 3.25 Room temperature UV-vis absorption of 3-4 and emission ...... 81
Figure 3.26 Room temperature UV-vis absorption and emission of 3-5 ...... 81
Figure 3.27 Room temperature UV-vis absorption & emission of 3-6...... 82
vii Figure 3.28 Room temperature excitation, emission, and near IR emission spectra of 3-4 ...... 82
Figure 3.29 Room temperature excitation and emission spectra of 3-5 ...... 83
Figure 3.30. Near IR excitation and emission spectra of 3-5 ...... 83
Figure 3.31 Room temperature excitation, emission and near IR emission spectra of 3-6 ...... 83
Figure 4.1 X-ray structure of [Ti4(maltolato)8(µ-O4)]• 18 H2O ...... 91
Figure 4.2 X-ray crystal structure of 4-5 ...... 96
Figure 4.3 Normalized room temperature UV-vis absorption of 4-1 in CH3CN ...... 98
Figure 4.4 Normalized room temperature UV-vis absorption of 4-2 in CH3CN ...... 99
Figure 4.5 Normalized room temperature UV-vis absorption of 4-3 CH3CN ...... 99
Figure 4.6 Normalized room temperature UV-vis absorption of 4-4 and emission ca. 530 at 77 K in CH3CN ...... 99
Figure 4.7 Normalized room temperature UV-vis absorption of 4-5 and emission at 77K ca. 642 nm in CH3CN ...... 100
Figure 4.8 Overlay of voltammograms for 4-1 ...... 101
Figure 4.9 Overlay of voltammograms for 4-2 ...... 102
Figure 4.10 Overlay of voltammograms for 4-4 ...... 103
Figure 4.11 Overlay of voltammograms for 4-5 ...... 103
Figure 4.12 Characterization of anatase (top) and rutile (bottom) nanorods of TiO2 with different aspect ratios by TEM images (A,B) and XRD Patterns (C). Adapted from Lu et. al34 ...... 106
Figure 4.13 Processed TEM images of rutile (101) and (301) twins...... 107
Figure 4.14 Dyes adsorbed on TiO2 ...... 107
Figure 4.15 TEM images of ZnO nanorods with different aspect ratio (A, B) ...... 108
Figure 4.16 Left, comparison of absorbance of thiomaltol (Htma) and dithiomaltol (Httma) in solution and adsorbed onto ZnO rods; right, FTIR spectra of dithiomaltol in solution and adsorbed onto ZnO rods ...... 108
viii Figure 4.17 Schematic showing ensemble of dye-coated nanoparticles for use on DSSC anode ...... 109
Figure 5.1 X-ray structure (ORTEP) of of 5-1 ...... 120
Figure 5.2 Proton NMR Spectra of 5-1 in (CD3)2CO...... 124
Figure 5.3 Proton NMR spectra of 5-2a in D2O/CD3OD...... 124
Figure 5.4 Proton NMR spectra of 5-2b in CD3OD...... 125
Figure 5.5 Phosphorus NMR of 5-2b ...... 125
Figure 5.6 Proton NMR spectra of 5-3 in CD3OD, excess triethylamine suppressed .... 126
Figure 5.7 Phosphorus NMR of 5-3 in D2O ...... 126
Figure 5.8 Proton-proton correlated 2D spectra of 5-2a in CD3OD ...... 127
Figure 5.9 Proton-carbon correlated 2D spectra of 5-2a in D2O/ CD3OD ...... 127
Figure 5.10 Proton-proton correlated 2D spectra of 5-2b in CD3OD ...... 128
1 13 Figure 5.11 2D HSQC H, C NMR of 5-2b in D2O/ CD3OD ...... 128
Figure 5.12 Overlay of voltammograms for 5-2b ...... 129
Figure 5.13 Overlay of voltammograms for 5-3 ...... 129
Figure 5.14 UV-vis absorbance and emission spectra of 5-1 in MeOH ...... 130
Figure 5.15 UV-vis absorption spectra and emission spectra of 5-2a in MeOH ...... 131
Figure 5.16 UV-vis absorbance spectra of 5-2b and 5-3 ...... 131
ix LIST OF SCHEMES
Scheme 1.1 Structures of maltol via conjugation and deprotonation ...... 1
Scheme 1.2 Synthetic strategies for ligand variation ...... 2
Scheme 1.3 Ligands derived from maltol ...... 2
Scheme 1.4 Jablonski Diagram of T1-T2 inversion ...... 5
Scheme 1.5 Schematic of a dye sensitized solar cell78 ...... 9
Scheme 1.6 Diagram of general set-up used for measuring IPCE ...... 10
Scheme 2.1 Ru(II) and Zn(II) complexes investigated in this work ...... 17
Scheme 2.2 Oxidative quenchers used...... 18
Scheme 2.3 Thermodynamic cycle with excited state reduction and oxidation potentials of [Ru(bpy)2ttma][PF6] ...... 37
Scheme 2.4 Thermodynamic cycle with excited state reduction and oxidation potentials of Zn(ttma)2 ...... 38
Scheme 2.5 C-H activation through thiopyrillium intermediate ...... 39
+ Scheme 2.6 Oxidative quneching reaction of [Ru(bpy)2ttma] ...... 40
Scheme 3.1 General synthesis and structure of Pt(bpy)(electron-donor) complexes...... 48
Scheme 3.2 Mixed, O,S and O,O chelating ligands ...... 48
Scheme 3.3 Proposed thio-pyrillium intermediate in C-H activation mechanism...... 79
Scheme 4.1 Proposed anthocyanin-Ti(IV) complex ...... 90
Scheme 4.2 Titanium complexes and their assignments ...... 92
Scheme 5.1 General structure of a spirophosphorane ...... 113
Scheme 5.2 General structure of complexes described ...... 114
Scheme 5.3 Reaction schemes for 5-1 and 5-2a ...... 118
Scheme 5.4 General structure of complexes 5-1 – 5-3 with proposed hydrogen connectivity ...... 132
x LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Structural, electronic, and Fe(III) affinities of Fe(III) complexes of maltol, thiomaltol, deferiprone, and hopto ...... 8
Table 2.1 Crystallographic data of Httma, 2-3, and 2-4 ...... 26
Table 2.2 Structural data of complex 2-1 ...... 27
Table 2.3 Structural data of complex 2-4 ...... 28
Table 2.4 Electrochemical data. All potentials adjusted vs. NHE in CH3CN, 0.1 M TBAPF6 ...... 29
Table 2.5 Photochemical Data ...... 30
Table 2.6 Photolysis yields, % yielda (isolatedb) ...... 33
Table 2.7 Aromaticity comparison ...... 40
Table 2.8 Potential vs. photolysis yields ...... 42
Table 2.9 Calculated absorption energies and excited state reduction and oxidation potentials vs. NHE ...... 43
Table 3.1 Redox potentials of compounds 3-1 - 3-3 ...... 59
Table 3.2 Electronic absorption maxima of complexes 3-1 - 3-3 ...... 62
Table 3.3 Excitation and emission peak wavelengths, lifetimes (τ) at 298 K and 77 K, and quantum yield (φF) for complexes 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 ...... 67
Table 3.4 Stern-Volmer constants (Ksv) calculated for quenching of complex 3-1 – 3-3 luminescence by [MV]2+ ...... 68
Table 3.5 Optimal concentrations of compounds 3-1 – 3-3 (µmol/L) for maximum emission ...... 70
1 Table 3.6 Quantum yields for O2 generation () and rate constants for quenching (kT) by compounds 3-1 – 3-3 ...... 72
Table 3.7. Summary of photochemical data for complexes 4-6 ...... 84
Table 4.1 Summary of parameters for data collection and structure refinement of 4-5 ... 96
xi Table 4.2 Selected Chemical shifts in Ti(IV) complexes with average aromaticity ...... 97
Table 4.3 Absorption bands’ absorptivities and assignments for 4-1 – 4-5 ...... 98
Table 4.4 Low temperature 77 K excitation & emission peak wavelengths (nm) in anhydrous CH3CN ...... 100
Table 4.5 Redox potentials vs. NHE corrected with ferrocene vs. NHE ...... 104
Table 5.1 Crystallographic data for 5-1 ...... 120
Table 5.2 Bond lengths in 5-1 ...... 122
Table 5.3 Bond angles in 5-1 ...... 122
Table 5.4 Ligand vinylic proton1H NMR chemical shifts (ppm)...... 123
xii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank Dr. Farmer. His knowledge and support throughout my
graduate career has been invaluable. While administrative duties have kept him busy over
the years, his heart, mind, office door and were always open to his students.
To my committee, I am appreciative for your patience, support, and availability.
Dr. Klausmeyer, for his strong will to examine each and every crystal, no matter the
quality. Dr. Martin, for his insight and neighborly support through the writing process.
Dr. Shuford, for arming me with tools to better understand computation chemistry. Dr.
Zhang, for her support and availability to step in and keep my defense on track.
I would also like to thank the Department of Chemistry at Baylor University.
Nancy Kallus, Adonna Cook, Virginia Hynek, and Barbara Rauls, whom in their busy schedules take the daily obstacles each graduate student faces and makes it effortless and uncomplicated.
I would also like to thank the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research fund for the generous financial support. Without the funds available to purchase equipment and chemicals or to support myself, I would never have made it by this time to the point I am at now in my academic career.
I must also thank my colleagues in the Farmer Research Group, without whom, things would have been much darker in the lab. My roommates and friends, for the timely laughs and distractions to keep me well adjusted. My family, for feeding my soul and body to keep me moving towards my goals. My wife’s family, for the joys and strengths of a growing family. My wife and one true love, for putting up with playing second fiddle
xiii to chemistry, supporting me through long nights and weekends spent training for the
Ironman Triathlon, for being there at the finish line then, and now. Without her my heart would be empty and my work would be fallow.
Lastly, I would like to give acknowledgment and thanks to those that have lead me down my path. Mrs. Marshall, my high school chemistry teacher who inspired me to think deeply and ask not just why, but how. Dr. Smucker, my undergraduate research advisor who showed me how to work in a lab setting and allowed me learn from my own mistakes and successes.
Every day these people gave me their support in the means they were best suited.
xiv CHAPTER ONE
An Introduction and Background on the Chemistry of 3-Hydroxy-2-Methyl-4H-Pyrone and Its Use Towards a Photochemical Device
Introduction
Chemistry and Structure
Maltol, an FDA approved food additive. Maltol (3-hydroxy-2-methy-4H-pyran-
4-one, Scheme 1.1) is the oxidized product of the disaccharide maltose. It is a naturally
occurring organic compound that is readily found in pine needles, the bark of larch trees,
and roasted malt.1,2 Maltol is approved for flavor enhancement in the United States by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A semi-volatile organic compound, maltol imparts odors of cotton candy and caramel to the foods in which it is added. Maltol-
Fe(III) complexes have also been extensively studied due to their stabilities and solubility.3–19
OH O O O- OH OH O- O- +H -H
Protonation Deprotonation O O O O (Hydroxy-pyrillium) (Maltol) (Oxo-pyrillium) Scheme 1.1 Structures of maltol via conjugation and deprotonation
The structure of maltol is based on the organic compound 4H-pyrone (-pyrone)
with the formula C6H6O3. The nature of the conjugation in the pyrone’s ring and the -
1 hydroxy ketone allow for easy delocalization of the π-electrons, forming the tautomers
and resonance structures shown in Scheme 1.1. The stable bond arrangement for each
20 structure prevent the accurate determination of the bond arrangements when in solution.
A solvent’s effects on the bond lengths can be observed by the change in ring current and the amount of deshielding at the vinylic protons in 1H NMR experiments.21
Hydroxy-pyrillium Maltol OH O OH Aqueous HCl OH (pH 1)
O O
Nu- Polar aprotic or Reflux ≥72 hours Non-polar solvent X = N-R P2S5 or Lawesson's Reagent, O S Polar protic or OH OH non-polar solvent P2S5, X X X = N-Me, deferiprone O, thiomaltol S, dithiomaltol Scheme 1.2 Synthetic strategies for ligand variation
Ligands derived from maltol. Small organic molecules can be derived from
maltol by functional group transformations both on and in the ring. In-ring heteroatom
substitutions are possible when a strong nucleophile is reacted with maltol in acid or base
solutions.22–25 Substitution at the carbonyl O-atom is observed with thionating or
selenating reagents.22,26–30 Scheme 1.2 outlines the methods available in literature for
variations on the maltol motif as demonstrated in studies on maltol-derived ligands.
2 S S O S O S OH OH OH OH OH OH
O S N N N N Ph Ph (Htma) (Httma) (Deferiprone) (Hopto) (Hppp) (Htppp)
Scheme 1.3 Ligands derived from maltol
The earliest synthesized derivatives of maltol, thiomaltol and 3-hydroxy-1,2-
dimethylpyridin-4(1H)-one (deferiprone, Scheme 1.3) are obtained from simple, low
yield reactions. Deferiprone is generated in dilute hydrochloric acid via the addition of
methylamine to maltol.23 Alternative primary amines and other pnictogens are also viable
options.24,31 Thiomaltol and the thiolated deferiprone analogue, Hopto, can be obtained
using any non-polar or polar-aprotic solvent while refluxing in the presence of a
thiolating reagent, such as red phosphorous and sulfur, phosphorous pentasulfide, or
Lawesson’s Reagent.21,22,27–30,32
Ring substitution of the O-atom occurs sequentially to the carbonyl substitution
when experiments are performed with more than two molar equivalents of Lawesson’s
Reagent, producing dithiomaltol.30 Analogous chalcogens may allow for different carbonyl O-atom substitutions.32 Thiomaltol and dithiomaltol are noticeably different
from maltol in both color and odor; S-substitution shifts the characteristic maltol
absorptions to lower energies, with dithiomaltol having the lowest energy absorption.
Chemical shift and heteroaromaticity. The differences in 1H NMR chemical
shifts ( = ppm) of the vinylic protons on maltol, thiomaltol, and dithiomaltol (Figure
2 1.1) are shown as the chemical shifts of similar pyrones and thiopyrones have also been
indexed and reported.33–35
Heteroaromaticity is the degree of delocalization within a heterocycle.33–36 The
most frequently used method for comparing heteroaromaticity has been the Harmonic
Oscillator Model of Aromaticity (HOMA) index which is determined by subtracting the bond length elongations (BLE) and alterations (BLA) from the value one, Eq. 1.1.33–36
Thus the index assigns non-aromatics as equal to zero (= 0) and aromatics equal to one (=
1).33 Over the last decade, the Nuclear Independent Chemical Shift index (NICS) has
been the alternative to the HOMA index, with over 300 citations.37 This computational
method is based on values of magnetic shielding by the ring center.35,38,39 Alternatively,
the general or overall displacement of the average chemical shift can be used for a
comparison of ligands heteroaromaticity as shown in Eq. 1.2, where n corresponds to
the number of chemical shifts observed in the aromatic region.40
Figure 1.1 1H NMR stack plot of maltol (a), thiomaltol (b), dithiomaltol (c), Hopto (d), deferiprone (e)30
3 HOMA 1 BLE BLA 1.1
1 1.2 ⋯
The heteroaromaticity of pyrones and thiopyrones have been studied and predicted by DFT calculations.21,34,36,40 It is suggested that the cationic free ligand is the most aromatic while the anionic is the least aromatic. In their natural form, thiobenzenes are more aromatic. This is due to a combination of an increased ring size and change in electronegativity which give higher conjugation.40,41
Htma Hopto Httma Normalized Intensity Intensity Normalized 200 300 400 500 600 Wavelength (nm)
Figure 1.2 Room temperature UV-visible absorption spectra (normalized) of thiolated, maltol-derived ligands in CH3CN
Unique photochemistry of thiopyrones due to thiocarbonyl. The thiopyrones and their polyaromatic analogues, thioflavones, have unique photophysical and photochemical behaviors.42–48 Figure 1.2 shows how the visible absorption spectra of the
4 free thiolated ligands thiomaltol, dithiomaltol, and hopto vary with the simple transformations in structure. Polar or acidic solvents can affect the room temperature emissions implying multiple states, excited state lifetimes, and quantum yields of each electronic transition.49
Specifically, previous phosphorescence studies of aromatic thiones in solution at room temperature show that in some cases an excited state with the orbital configuration
43,44 of a T2 (π,π*) can be populated from a S0→S1, due to a T1–T2 energy inversion. The
Jablonski diagrams in Scheme 1.4 illustrate the orbital inversion of the T1-T2 excited states. The interpretation of this behavior suggests that the former T2 (π,π*) excited state is now directly populated by inner system crossing (ISC) over the former T1 (n,π*) state.
Characteristic emissions can be further enhanced when coordinated to transition metals with paired electrons.46 Understanding the manipulation of the triplet states (e.g., from n,
π* to π,π*) suggests applications in photosensitive materials for green pesticides, fluorimetric analysis of ion concentrations, imaging of bio-membrane structures, and
OLEDs.47–51
S2 * S2 * T2(π,π ) T2(n,π )
S1 IC S1 IC IC * IC * T (n,π ) T1(π,π ) ISC 1 ISC NR/Q NR/Q Solvent F F P P Energy → Energy
Energy →Energy NR/Q NR/Q
S0 S0
Scheme 1.4 Jablonski Diagram of T1-T2 inversion
5 Chelation and Coordination
Transition metal complexes. Transition metal and main group complexes with
maltol, thiomaltol, and other pyridone derivatives have been studied for the applications in medicine, metal transport/chelation drugs, treatment for Alzheimer’s, diabetes, anticancer applications, and tissue imaging.6,8–13,15,17–19,24,28,52–62 These metal complexes
are typically characterized by solid-state crystallography, and spectrochemical
characterizations. The results show a variety of behaviors that can be optimized for
specific roles, as previously cited.
The most extensive studies in literature examine maltol and deferiprone as iron-
specific-chelator pharmaceuticals. These drugs offer a potent means to correct the levels
of iron in the blood.3–6,8,9,12–15,17–19,27,29 Thiomaltol, and Hopto have been shown
comparable affinities for Fe(III) in aqueous solutions as to the O,O ligands (maltol and
deferiprone). The alpha-hydroxy ketone present in maltol and deferiprone chelate Fe(III)
similarly as catechols do but with greater Fe-O bond lengths variance, ca. ±0.04 Å and distortion in the twist angle at the octahedral Fe(III) center.27,29,8,18,63 These structural variances from catechols are attributed to the methyl group and ring oxygen.29 Structural
differences between the O,O complexes (maltol and deferiprone) and the O,S complexes
(thiomaltol and hopto) show larger chelate bite angles, longer Fe-S bond lengths than the
corresponding Fe-O bond length, and less trigonal twist.8,12,27,29 These studies imply a strong trans influence from the O,S ligands due to these structural assignments. Structures of tris-maltolato Fe(III) and tris-thiomaltolato Fe(III) shown in Figure 1.3.
6
a) b)
Figure 1.3 Solid state structures of trismaltolato Fe(III)8 (a) and tristhiomaltolato Fe(III)27 (b)
The Fe(III) complexes of maltol, thiomaltol, deferiprone, and hopto have unique
visible absorptions with maxima ranging from 410-615 nm.18,27,29,63 Lower energy
absorptions as in the Fe(III) complexes are not seen in the free O,O ligands. The
absorptions ca. 350 nm observed in both O,S give the free ligands a characteristic yellow
color. When Fe(III) is coordinated the observed changes in absorption bands depend on
the ligand’s substitution pattern. The higher energy absorptions are typically ligand-
centered and observed to increase in intensity and split while the lower energy
absorptions are mostly weaker in intensity charge-transfers (LMCT, MLCT, d-d
transitions) red-shifted from the free ligands.
From previous studies, deferiprone shows the greatest value for affinity towards
Fe(III). Deferiprone was only recently approved by the FDA for the use of iron-overload
treatment in the United States under the drug name Ferriprox®.64 Maltol has been used to solubilizes Al(III) for studies examining neurodegenerative disorders related to
Alzhiemers.52 Compared to maltol and deferiprone, thiomaltol shows comparably strong
7 affinities but is still bested by the O,O ligands due to the disfavored Fe(III) or Al(III) hard-soft-acid-base interactions imparted by the new thione.18,27,65,66
Table 1.1 Structural, electronic, and Fe(III) affinities of Fe(III) complexes of maltol, thiomaltol, deferiprone, and hopto
Maltol Deferiprone Thiomaltol Hopto Bite Angle (deg.) 80.5 av. 80.8 av. 81.5 av. 80.9 av. Fe-O Bond Length (Å) 1.987 av. 1.998 av. 1.979 av. 2.007 av. Fe-O/S Bond Length (Å) 2.065 av. 2.046 av. 2.499 av. 2.471 av. Octahedral Twist (deg.) 50.4 44.9 48.2 43.6 UV-vis (λmax) 468 460 615 550 pFe 16.9 14.1 20.2 15.6
Dye Sensitized Solar Cells
Sensitization of photosensitive semiconductors. One possible use for these maltol-based compounds (Scheme 1.3) may be in DSSCs as photoreductants adsorbed onto titania (TiO2) particles at the anode surface. The low cost, photo activity, and stability have made titania popular in use of light-to-energy applications such as those studied by Michael Grätzel et al.67–77 on dye-sensitized solar cells, (DSSCs). This photovoltaic device is essentially an electrochemical cell with modified anodes and cathodes bridged by a hole-transport material (HTM), which is often a solution of an oxidizable electrolyte such as an iodide/triiodide mixture, Scheme 1.5.78 The anode is a transparent indium-doped tin oxide layer (ITO) on glass with a porous coating of titania
(TiO2) on which a photoreductant dye is adsorbed. Often the cathode is a Pt surface or an
ITO plate, modified with carbon or soot to facilitate triiodide reduction. Excitation of the photoreductant dye leads to generation of an excited state with the proper energetics from which electrons are injected to the conduction band of TiO2, and are ultimately
8 transferred to the anodic ITO plate, k1 in Scheme 1.5. The oxidized dye is then reduced by iodide at the anode/HTM interface, k2, and the hole filled by reduction of triiodide at the HTM/cathode interface, k3. Thus, a photoreduction is initiated at the dye/TiO2 surface
(or alternative metal oxide nanoparticles crucial to facilitating charge separation), and the hole is carried back to the cathode surface by the HTM. The overall potential realized by such a system depends on the conduction band energy of the injected electron and the reduction potential of the hole-transporter.
Scheme 1.5 Schematic of a dye sensitized solar cell78
Grätzel’s collection of works have focused on understanding the electron transfer mechanisms that govern incident photon conversion efficiency (IPCE) and the properties of the materials used to favor efficient electron transport.67,71,72 The DSSC outlined in
Scheme 1.5 draws the favored route for the electron cascade, not shown are the
9 disfavored back electron transfers that work against the current. Measuring the IPCE with instrumentation outlined in Scheme 1.6 have lead identified devices comparable in efficiency to modern commercial silicon-type photovoltaics.76
Plot Monochromatic Light Source Analog/Digital Converter
+- Lock-In V R Amplifier
DSSC
Scheme 1.6 Diagram of general set-up used for measuring IPCE
Maltol-derived ligands have chelating α-hydroxy ketone functionalities analogous to that of anthocyanin, a red dye found in berries with unusually high efficiency for
DSSCs.67 The basis of using maltol-based ligands as sensitizers for DSSCs applications is presented in the following chapters by examining and comparing the photochemical and photophysical behaviors of their complexes with transition metals. The results in each set of experiments with the late transition metals, Ru(II) and Pt(II), exhibit unique photochemistry and photophysical behaviors. Initial results with Ti(IV) show late transition metals are not needed for photochemical reactivity, thus suggesting applications in DSSCs.
10 REFERENCES
(1) Peratoner, A.; Tamburello, A. Berichte Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 3407–3409.
(2) Kihara, K. Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi 1940, 43, 132.
(3) Kidani, Y. Nagoya-Shiritsu Daigaku Yakugakubu Kenkyu Nenpo 1971, 16.
(4) Jungnickel, H. E.; Klinger, W. Pharmazie 1963, 18, 128–130.
(5) Stefanovic, A.; Havel, J.; Sommer, L. Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun. 1968, 33, 4198–4214.
(6) Scarrow, R. C.; Riley, P. E.; Abu-Dari, K.; White, D. L.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 954–967.
(7) Kontoghiorghes, J. G. Arzneimittelforschung. 1987, 37, 1099–1102.
(8) Ahmet, M. T.; Frampton, C. S.; Silver, J. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1988, 1159– 1163.
(9) Dobbin, P. S.; Hider, R. C.; Hall, A. D.; Taylor, P. D.; Sarpong, P.; Porter, J. B.; Xiao, G.; van der Helm, D. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2448–2458.
(10) Kohl, B.; Beller, K.-D.; Kley, H.-P.; Krueger, U.; Hanauer, G. Highly organ- specific magnetic resonance contrast agents for diagnosis - contain ((1H-)- pyridone-3-olato)- iron (III) or manganese II complex. DE4320308 (A1), December 23, 1993.
(11) Melchior, M.; Rettig, S. J.; Liboiron, B. D.; Thompson, K. H.; Yuen, V. G.; McNeill, J. H.; Orvig, C. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 4686–4690.
(12) Kruck, T. P. A.; Burrow, T. E. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002, 88, 19–24.
(13) Kalinowski, D. S.; Richardson, D. R. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57, 547–583.
(14) Schlindwein, W.; Waltham, E.; Burgess, J.; Binsted, N.; Nunes, A.; Leite, A.; Rangel, M. Dalton Trans. 2006, 1313–1321.
(15) Harrington, J. M.; Chittamuru, S.; Dhungana, S.; Jacobs, H. K.; Gopalan, A. S.; Crumbliss, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 8208–8221.
(16) Shishido, K.; Yoshida, M.; Takai, H.; Mitsuhashi, C. HETEROCYCLES 2010, 82, 881.
11 (17) Sooriyaarachchi, M.; Gailer, J. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 7466–7473.
(18) Chaves, S.; Canário, S.; Carrasco, M. P.; Mira, L.; Santos, M. A. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2012, 114, 38–46.
(19) Burrows, A. D.; Jurcic, M.; Keenan, L. L.; Lane, R. A.; Mahon, M. F.; Warren, M. R.; Nowell, H.; Paradowski, M.; Spencer, J. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 11260– 11262.
(20) Cavalieri, L. F. Chem. Rev. 1947, 41, 525–584.
(21) Nguyen, T. K. P.; Nguyen, K. P. P.; Kamounah, F. S.; Zhang, W.; Hansen, P. E. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2009, 47, 1043–1054.
(22) Blazevic, K.; Jakopcic, K.; Hahn, V. Bull. Sci. Sect. Sci. Nat. Tech. Medicales 1969, 14, 1.
(23) Harris, R. L. N. Aust. J. Chem. 1976, 29, 1329–1334.
(24) Zhang, Z.; Rettig, S. J.; Orvig, C. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 509–515.
(25) Scott, L. E.; Page, B. D. G.; Patrick, B. O.; Orvig, C. Dalton Trans. 2008, 6364.
(26) Gaudemar, F. Compt Rend 1956, 242, 2471–2473.
(27) Lewis, J. A.; Puerta, D. T.; Cohen, S. M. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 7455–7459.
(28) Monga, V.; Patrick, B. O.; Orvig, C. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 2666–2677.
(29) Lewis, J. A.; Tran, B. L.; Puerta, D. T.; Rumberger, E. M.; Hendrickson, D. N.; Cohen, S. M. Dalton Trans. 2005, 2588.
(30) Brayton, D.; Jacobsen, F. E.; Cohen, S. M.; Farmer, P. J. Chem. Commun. 2006, 206.
(31) Maerkl, G.; Kallmuenzer, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5245–5248.
(32) Tejchman, W.; Zborowski, K.; Lasocha, W.; Proniewicz, L. HETEROCYCLES 2008, 75, 1931–1942.
(33) Kruszewski, J.; Krygowski, T. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 3839–3842.
(34) Pozharskii, A. F. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1985, 21, 717–749.
(35) Schleyer, P. von R. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1115–1118.
(36) Zborowski, K.; Grybos, R.; Proniewicz, L. M. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 18, 250– 254.
12 (37) American Chemical Society. Scifinder https://scifinder.cas.org/scifinder/defaultPage.
(38) Schleyer, P. von R.; Maerker, C.; Dransfeld, A.; Jiao, H.; Hommes, N. J. R. van E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6317–6318.
(39) Patchkovskii, S.; Thiel, W. Mol. Model. Annu. 2000, 6, 67–75.
(40) Jonás, J.; Derbyshire, W.; Gutowsky, H. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 1–5.
(41) Hortmann, A. G.; Harris, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 2471–2481.
(42) Turro, N. J.; Ramamurthy, V.; Cherry, W.; Farneth, W. Chem. Rev. 1978, 78, 125– 145.
(43) Szymanski, M.; Steer, R. P.; Maciejewski, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, 135, 243– 248.
(44) Maciejewski, A.; Szymanski, M.; Steer, R. P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 143, 559– 564.
(45) Morrison, H.; Lu, Y.; Carlson, D. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5421–5432.
(46) Borges, M.; Romão, A.; Matos, O.; Marzano, C.; Caffieri, S.; Becker, R. S.; Maçanita, A. L. Photochem. Photobiol. 2002, 75, 97–106.
(47) Valente, J. V.; Buntine, M. A.; Lincoln, S. F.; David Ward, A. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2007, 360, 3380–3386.
(48) Evans, R. C.; Douglas, P.; Winscom, C. J. J. Fluoresc. 2009, 19, 169–177.
(49) Smith, G. J.; Thomsen, S. J.; Markham, K. R.; Andary, C.; Cardon, D. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2000, 136, 87–91.
(50) Tran, B. L.; Cohen, S. M. Chem. Commun. 2006, 203.
(51) Roshal, A. D.; Grigorovich, A. V.; Doroshenko, A. O.; Pivovarenko, V. G.; Demchenko, A. P. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 1999, 127, 89–100.
(52) Finnegan, M. M.; Rettig, S. J.; Orvig, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5033–5035.
(53) Orvig, C.; Caravan, P.; Gelmini, L.; Glover, N.; Herring, F. G.; Li, H.; McNeill, J. H.; Rettig, S. J.; Setyawati, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12759–12770.
(54) Sun, Y.; James, B. R.; Rettig, S. J.; Orvig, C. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 1667–1673.
(55) Monga, V.; Thompson, K. H.; Yuen, V. G.; Sharma, V.; Patrick, B. O.; McNeill, J. H.; Orvig, C. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 2678–2688.
13 (56) Thompson, K. H.; Lichter, J.; LeBel, C.; Scaife, M. C.; McNeill, J. H.; Orvig, C. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2009, 103, 554–558.
(57) Islam, M. N.; Kumbhar, A. A.; Kumbhar, A. S.; Zeller, M.; Butcher, R. J.; Dusane, M. B.; Joshi, B. N. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 8237–8246.
(58) Arisawa, M.; Torisawa, Y.; Kawahara, M.; Yamanaka, M.; Nishida, A.; Nakagawa, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4327–4329.
(59) Scott, L. E.; Page, B. D. G.; Patrick, B. O.; Orvig, C. Dalton Trans. 2008, 6364.
(60) Kiss, T.; Jakusch, T.; Hollender, D.; Enyedy, É. A.; Horváth, L. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2009, 103, 527–535.
(61) Cecconi, F.; Ghilardi, C. A.; Ienco, A.; Mariani, P.; Mealli, C.; Midollini, S.; Orlandini, A.; Vacca, A. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 4006–4017.
(62) Lewis, J. A.; Cohen, S. M. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 6534–6536.
(63) Šebestík, J.; Šafařík, M.; Bouř, P. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 4473–4481.
(64) Press Announcements - FDA approves Ferriprox to treat patients with excess iron in the body http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm275814.ht m (accessed Feb 14, 2014).
(65) Lewis, J. A.; Mongan, J.; McCammon, J. A.; Cohen, S. M. ChemMedChem 2006, 1, 694–697.
(66) Enyedy, É. A.; Dömötör, O.; Varga, E.; Kiss, T.; Trondl, R.; Hartinger, C. G.; Keppler, B. K. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2012, 117, 189–197.
(67) Cherepy, N. J.; Smestad, G. P.; Grätzel, M.; Zhang, J. Z. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 9342–9351.
(68) O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740.
(69) Kay, A.; Graetzel, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 6272–6277.
(70) Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Kay, A.; Rodicio, I.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Mueller, E.; Liska, P.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Graetzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6382–6390.
(71) Huber, R.; Spörlein, S.; Moser, J. E.; Grätzel, M.; Wachtveitl, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 8995–9003.
(72) Wang, P.; Klein, C.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Grätzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 808–809.
14 (73) De Angelis, F.; Fantacci, S.; Selloni, A.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Grätzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14156–14157.
(74) Zhang, Z.; Chen, P.; Murakami, T. N.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Grätzel, M. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 341–346.
(75) Grätzel, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1788–1798.
(76) Yella, A.; Lee, H.-W.; Tsao, H. N.; Yi, C.; Chandiran, A. K.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Diau, E. W.-G.; Yeh, C.-Y.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Grätzel, M. Science 2011, 334, 629–634.
(77) Smestad, G.; Bignozzi, C.; Argazzi, R. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1994, 32, 259–272.
(78) Robertson, N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2338–2345.
15 CHAPTER TWO
Ligand-based Photooxidations of Dithiomaltolato Complexes of Ru(II) and Zn(II): Photolytic CH Activation and Evidence of Singlet Oxygen Generation and Quenching
Portions of this chapter published as: Bruner, B.; Walker, M. B.; Ghimire, M. M.; Zhang, D.; Selke, M.; Klausmeyer, K.; Omary, M.; Farmer, P. J. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 11548- 11556.
Introduction
Dye Research and Development
Much effort has gone into the development of new photochemical dyes, which induce electron transfer reactions upon exposure to light for uses in dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC) and other photochemical applications.1 Most commonly used are
luminescent compounds based on the well-known families of Ru(diimine)x and porphyrin-based species that form long-lived triplet states (3ES) and undergo facile
2 2+ electron-transfer reactions. In particular, the [Ru(diimine)2L] family of complexes has
been extensively studied due to photochemical redox reactivity involving electron
transfer reactions from long-lived luminescent states.3–9
Anthocyanin, a red dye found in many berries, was shown to have an unusually
good efficiency as a DSSC dye when chelated to the surface of titania.10 Chemically
similar hydroxy-pyrone chelates such as maltol have been studied for use as diagnostic
tools,11 anticancer drugs,12,13 and metal transport.14–16 Thiomaltol, discovered in 1969,17 in which the pyronal ketone is replaced with a thione, has been used for similar applications.18,19 A ring substituted derivative, 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4H-thiopyran-4-
thione, dithiomaltol or Httma, was first reported by Brayton and displayed unusual
16 aromaticity characterized by a downfield shift in the vinylic proton peaks in the 1H NMR
spectrum.20
Recently, the Farmer group reported that the bis-bipyridyl Ru(II) complex of
dithiomaltol, [Ru(bpy)2(ttma)][PF6], 2-1, undergoes C-H activation at a pendant alkyl
+ position upon electrochemical or bulk oxidation, yielding [Ru(bpy)2(ttma-alcohol)] , 2-2,
+ 21 and [Ru(bpy)2(ttma-aldehyde)] , 2-3, as products (Figure 2.1). This chapter examines
the photo-initiation of similar oxidative reactivity for compound 1 and the homoleptic
Zn(ttma)2 complex, 2-4 (Figure 2.1), using flash quench methodology employing electron acceptors 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridinium ([MV]+2), pentamminechlorocobalt(III)
chloride (Co(NH3)5Cl3), hexaammineruthenium(III) chloride (Ru(NH3)6Cl3), and 2,3-
dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ), Scheme 2.2.22
+
N R N O S O S S Ru+2 Zn+2 S N S O S N Complex -R 2-4 2-1 -CH3 2-2 -CH2OH 2-3 -CHO
Scheme 2.1 Ru(II) and Zn(II) complexes investigated in this work
17 Cl Cl NH3 3 NH3 3 NH3 NH3 +3 +3 H3N Ru NH3 H3N Co Cl
H3N H3N H3N H3N
Cl2 O N N N Cl
Br2 Cl N N N O
Scheme 2.2 Oxidative quenchers used
Experimental
Materials and Methods
Reagents. The dithiomaltol ligand, [Ru(bpy)2(ttma)][PF6], Zn(ttma)2 and 4,4’-
dimethyl-1,1’-trimethylene-2,2’dipyridinium dibromide, [DTDP][Br2], were prepared
16,23 +2 according to published procedures. Electron acceptors, [MV] , Co(NH3)5Cl3,
Ru(NH3)6Cl3, DDQ and all other chemicals used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Air-sensitive manipulations were carried out using Schlenk techniques or in an anaerobic dry glovebox.
Physical measurements. Electronic absorption spectra were recorded by Perkin
Elmer Lambda 900 or a Hewlett Packard 8453 Diode Array spectrophotometers.
Emission and excitation spectra were recorded on a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrometer. All photochemical reactions were performed in anaerobic quartz fluorescence cells or sealed jacketed beakers.
18 X-Ray diffraction. Crystallographic data was collected on crystals with
dimensions 0.31 x 0.18 x 0.08 mm for 2-1, 0.28 x 0.17 x 0.14 mm for 2, 0.28 x 0.17 x
0.14 mm for 2-4, and 0.31 x 0.18 x 0.08 mm for Httma. Data was collected at 110 K on a
Bruker X8 Apex using Mo-K radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). All structures were solved by
direct methods after correction of the data using SADABS.24–26 All the data were
processed using the Bruker AXS SHELXTL software, version 6.10.27
Electrochemistry. Redox potentials were measured by cyclic voltammetry under anaerobic conditions using a CHI-760B potentiostat in dry-degassed CH3CN with 0.1 M
tetrabutylammonioum hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) as the supporting electrolyte. The
cells consisted of a glassy-carbon working electrode (3.0 mm dia.), an AgCl coated Ag
reference wire, and a coiled Pt wire auxiliary electrode. Measured potentials were
corrected using a ferrocene standard, with the Fc/Fc+ couple set to 642 mV NHE.
Photolysis. Large-scale photolysis experiments were carried out using an Oriel
Apex Quartz Tungsten Halogen Source with a 150 W Xe Arc Lamp and filter
accessories. Samples were stirred under N2 at 5˚C for 3 hr. Smaller scale photolysis were
performed anaerobically in a 3 mL anaerobic quartz fluorescence cells for 45 min
followed by a bench top workup.
Quantification by mass spectrometry. All mass spectra were collected on an
Accela Bundle Liquid Chromatograph (LC) coupled to a Thermo Electron Linear Trap
Quadropole Orbitrap Discovery mass spectrometer (Orbitrap) using positive electrospray
ionization (+ESI) or by Direct Infusion (DI) with +ESI. Data was collected and processed
19 using Xcalibur v.2.0.7 software. Standards for LC separation were used to calibrate
reaction yields for compounds 2-1 and 2-3. Separated products were collected by column-chromatography inside a glove box for isolated yields. Samples were collected
and stored under inert atmosphere, removed from the glovebox, dried in vacuo, and
returned to the glovebox to record mass and prepare samples for 1H NMR spectroscopy.
+ + [Ru(bpy)2ttma] and [Ru(bpy)2(ttma-aldehyde] were quantified from photolysis
reactions by separation on a 15 cm × 2.1 mm (5 μm, 300 Å) ZORBAX extend-C18
column (Agilent Technologies). A binary mobile phase gradient containing 0.1 %
(vol/vol) formic acid in water (A) and CH3CN (B). The elution conditions are expressed
as percentages A/B: 0-2 min, 97/3; 2-15 min, 97/3-2/98; 15-18 min, 2/98; 18-24, 2/98-
97/3; flow rate: 350 µL/min, temperature: 24˚C. Autosampler operations were set to a
10.0 µL injection volume at 24˚C. A switch valve was used between the Accela Bundle
LC and the Orbitrap and programmed as follows: 0-2 min position A (waste), 2-20 min
Position B (collect), 20-24 min position A. Full-scan accurate mass spectra (m/z range
50–1000) of eluting compounds were obtained at high resolution (30,000 FWHM) on the
Orbitrap mass analyzer. Tris(2,2’-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) chloride [Ru(bpy)3][Cl]2 was
used as an internal standard for calibration.
Standard solutions of 0.0, 0.1, 1, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 and 30 ppm were prepared for
the analysis of reaction percent yield (% yield) by external calibration with an internal
standard Ru(bpy)3 of 5 ppm for added internal calibration. External calibration curves
+ were plotted with the concentrations of known [Ru(bpy)2ttma] and [Ru(bpy)2ttma- aldehyde]+ against the corresponding peak area. Internal calibration curves were plotted with the known concentrations of analyte against the analyte/internal standard peak area
20 + ratio. Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicates of [Ru(bpy)2ttma] and [Ru(bpy)2ttma- aldehyde]+ were added to the reactions to verify instrument response and sample
integrity. Peak areas were integrated using the Xcalibur Qualbrowser Software.
Calibration curves and statistics were performed with Mircosoft Excel for Mac 2011.
Photophysical and photochemical studies. Near IR emissions were measured in
acetonitrile (CH3CN) with a Photon Technology International (PTI) QuantaMaster Model
QM-4 scanning spectrofluorometer equipped with a 75-watt xenon flash lamp, emission
and excitation monochromators, excitation correction unit, and a near-infrared (NIR)
PMT from Hamamatsu. Lifetimes were collected using a pulsed Xenon source with a
pulse repetition rate of 300 pulse/sec and a PTI-supplied Gated Voltage-Controlled
Integrator to interface to the NIR PMT.
Excited-state oxidation and reduction potentials were determined by the observed
E00 for singlet spin states, and approximated for the triplet spin states based on the
observed emission wavelength. Thermodynamic cycles were then drawn with the excited
state reduction and oxidation potentials calculated from the equations 2.1 and 2.2.